Project Expansion Eoloeléctrico Honduras 2000”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Expansion Eoloeléctrico Honduras 2000” ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT “PROJECT EXPANSION EOLOELÉCTRICO HONDURAS 2000” Tegucigalpa, M.D.C. Honduras, C.A. September 2008 DAC Project Expansion Eoloeléctrico Honduras 2000 AMBITEC, S.A. INDEX I. General Information. ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Project Name. ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Economic Activity. ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Location. ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Total Investment. .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5. Attorney In Fact. ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6. Legal Representative.................................................................................................................................... 7 II. Biophysical Description of the Project Area. ........................................................................................................ 8 2.1. Geographical Conditions. ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1. Geology................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2. Land Use............................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.3. Topography. .......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.4. Orography. ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2. Surface and Groundwater Hydrography ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1. Surface Hydrography .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2. Groundwater Hydrography. ................................................................................................................. 10 2.3. Climatological Conditions. .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1. Wind Velocity ...................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.2. Wind Studies in the New Locations .................................................................................................... 12 2.4. Flora and Fauna. ........................................................................................................................................ 14 2.4.1. Flora .................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.2. Fauna .................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.5. Environmentally Important Areas. .............................................................................................................. 15 III. Socioeconomic Situation. .................................................................................................................................. 17 3.1. Means of Communication in the Area. ....................................................................................................... 19 3.2. Nearest Towns. .......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3. Economic Activities in the Area. ................................................................................................................. 20 3.4. Community Structures ................................................................................................................................ 20 3.5. Water Supply Source of Nearby Populations. ............................................................................................ 20 3.6. Project Socialization. .................................................................................................................................. 20 IV. Description of Project Activities to Carry Out in Each Phase. ........................................................................... 22 4.1. Construction. .............................................................................................................................................. 22 4.2. Operation. ................................................................................................................................................... 25 V. Human Resources. ............................................................................................................................................ 32 5.1. Number of Employees. ............................................................................................................................... 32 5.2. Distribution by Area .................................................................................................................................... 32 5.3. Work Schedule ........................................................................................................................................... 33 5.4. Benefits Offered.......................................................................................................................................... 33 VI. Basic Services. ................................................................................................................................................. 34 6.1. Water Supply and Consumption. ................................................................................................................ 34 6.2. Garbage Collection. .................................................................................................................................... 34 6.3. Telephone Access. ..................................................................................................................................... 34 6.4. Stormwater and Sanitation System ............................................................................................................ 34 6.5. Roadway System........................................................................................................................................ 34 6.6. Energy Type ............................................................................................................................................... 34 ii Property of Energía Eólica de Honduras and Mesoamerica Energy DAC Project Expansion Eoloeléctrico Honduras 2000 AMBITEC, S.A. VII. Contingencies. ................................................................................................................................................. 35 7.1. Contingency Plan and Risk Management. ................................................................................................. 35 7.1.1. Construction Phase ............................................................................................................................. 35 7.1.1.1. Safety in Construction and Assembly Works ............................................................................. 35 7.1.2. Operation Phase. ................................................................................................................................ 50 7.1.2.1. Contingency Plan against Pasture or Brush Fires ..................................................................... 51 7.1.2.2. Preventive Maintenance Plan to avoid Tower Blade or Mechanical Equipment Throws. .......... 52 7.1.2.3. Contingency Plan against Hurricane Force Winds. .................................................................... 52 7.1.2.4. Restricted Access Warning Signs in Proximity to Wind Turbine Towers. .................................. 53 7.1.2.5. Airplane or Bird Collisions. ......................................................................................................... 53 7.1.2.6. Electromagnetic Interference Contingency Plan. ....................................................................... 53 7.2. Occupational Safety. .................................................................................................................................. 54 VIII. Environmental Indicators. ............................................................................................................................... 57 8.1. Positive Impacts (General Description). ..................................................................................................... 57 8.2. Aspects that affect Human Perception or Behavior. ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sabana Grande Ojojona Curarén Alubarén La Libertad
    I l'Jf.. v 1 Zonas: Sabana Grande Ojojona Curarén Alubarén Reitoca San Miguelito La Libertad ZAMORANO UNIDAD EMPRESARIAL DE SERVICIOS AGRICOLAS ... Marzo 8, 1999 Servicio Holandés de Cooperación al Desarrollo Tegucigalpa. Att. Sr.Lex Hoefsloot Estimado Sr. Hoefsloot: Adjunto un original y una copia del informe final del Estudio de Posibilidades de Miniproyectos de Riego que bajo convenio suscrito entre Zamorano y SNV hemos realizado para Uds. Como era sabido, el corto tiempo dedicado a cubrir una área tan grande no nos permitió obtener en algunas ocasiones información suficiente en especial para aquellos proyectos considerados grandes dentro de la cobertura del proyecto, no obstante creemos que la información generada por el equipo conformado por Zamorano, SNV e INFOP es bastante detallada y en la gran mayoría de los casos servirá para tomar un curso de acción. Hemos identificado algunos proyectos que en el caso de resolver ciertas dificultades particulares bien podrían estudiarse posteriormente. Agradecemos la confianza depositada en nosotros y esperamos que sea el inicio de una relación de cooperación creciente entre nuestras instituciones para beneficio mutuo y de Honduras. Quedamos a sus completas ordenes para cualquier aclaración necesaria, de Ud, Con Toda Consideración y Respeto, ~an~-/ Gerente UESA ce: Dr.Mario Contreras Director Ejecutivo Zamorano UESA Marzo 1999 ESTUDIO DE POSIBILIDADES DE MINIPROYECTOS DE RIEGO ZONAS: SABANAGRANDE-OJOJONA, CURAREN-ALUBAREN-REITOCA Y SAN MIGUELITO Y LA LffiERTAD l.O ANTECEDENTES. Con ocasión del fenómeno MITCH ocurrido a fmes de octubre del año recién pasado causando fuertes laños a la infraestructura nacional, el Servicio Holandés de Cooperación al Desarrollo a través de su epresentante el Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Insufficient Water Supply in an Urban Area  Case Study: Tegucigalpa, Honduras
    INSUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLY IN AN URBAN AREA CASE STUDY: TEGUCIGALPA, HONDURAS Zairis Aida Coello Midence Balthasar December 2011 TRITA-LWR LIC 2958 ISSN 1650-8629 ISRN KTH/LWR/LIC 2058-SE ISBN 978-91-7501-211-7 Zairis Coello Midence Balthasar TRITA LWR LIC 2058 © Zairis Coello Midence Balthasar 2011 Licentiate Thesis Water Management Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM, Sweden Reference to this publication should be written as: Coello Balthasar, Z (2011) Insufficient water supply in an urban area – case study: Tegucigalpa, Honduras TRITA LWR LIC 2058. ii Insufficient water supply in an urban area – case study: Tegucigalpa, Honduras ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was financed by the Department of Research Cooperation of the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA/SAREC) within the collaboration program between the Universidad Autónoma de Honduras (UNAH). I would like to thank my supervisors Jan Erik Gustafsson, Patricia Phumpiu and Gladis Rojas for providing me with the support to carry out my research and for helping me get started in the scientific world. I wish to extend my profound gratitude to Berit Balfors and Stella Lowder whose support, advice and guidance were essential for the finalization of this research. I wish to express my gratitude for the support provided by UNAH, especially Lelany Pineda; Mónico Oyuela; Saul Jimenez and also to Patricia Hernandez for providing me with working facilities during my visits to Honduras. This research would not have been possible without the support of the submanager of SANAA, Ricardo Velasquez and everyone who contributed during the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultores Financieros Internacionales, SA
    Consultores Financieros Internacionales, S.A. Avenida República del Uruguay, No. 2302, Colonia Tepeyac Tegucigalpa, M.D.C., Honduras. Tel.: (504) 232-1039 Telefax: (504) 239-3107. E-mail: [email protected] DIAGNÓSTICO INSTITUCIONAL Y FINANCIERO MUNICIPIO DE GUAIMACA, DEPARTAMENTO DE FRANCISCO MORAZÁN Documento presentado a la Secretaría de Gobernación y Justicia, mediante Contrato de Servicios de Consultoría No. FC-0009, para la Elaboración de Diagnóstico y Formulación de Planes de Asistencia Técnica Municipal (PATMUNI´s) Programa de Reducción de la Pobreza y Desarrollo Local Fase II Préstamo BID No. 1478/SF-HO Tegucigalpa, M.D.C., 14 de Septiembre de 2005 Honduras, C.A. DIAGNÓSTICO INSTITUCIONAL Y FINANCIERO, MUNICIPIO DE GUAIMACA, FRANCISCO MORAZÁN COFINSA Diagnóstico Institucional y Financiero Municipalidad de Guaimaca, Departamento de Francisco Morazán I. Presentación 3 II. Metodología 4 1. Desarrollo Institucional para un Buen Gobierno 5 1.1 Análisis del Municipio 5 1.1.1 Aspectos Históricos 5 1.1.2 Aspectos Físicos y Geográficos 6 1.1.3 Aspectos Institucionales 9 1.1.4 Aspectos Demográficos 12 1.1.5 Aspectos Económicos 15 1.1.6 Aspectos Sociales 15 1.1.7 Aspectos de Infraestructura 18 1.2 Análisis de los Aspectos Administrativos 18 1.2.1 Estructura Organizativa 19 Organigrama de la Municipalidad 21 1.2.2 Funcionamiento de los Procesos Administrativos y Financieros 22 1.2.3 Control interno, Reglamentos, Normas y Procedimientos 23 1.2.4 Instrumentos de Administración 23 1.2.5 Análisis Técnico del Sistema de Generación de Ingresos
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Pinus Patula, I? Tecunum R Oocarpa, R Caribaea Var
    Classification of Pinus patula, I? tecunum R oocarpa, R caribaea var. hondurensis, and Related nomic Entities A.E. Squillace and Jesse I? Perry, Jr. Abstract Stem xylem terpenes of 75 pine populations were studied to others including Styles ( 19'76 and 1985), Styles and deterrnirre relationships among taxonomic entities. Typical Hughes (19831, Locklzart (1985, 1990b), Dvorak and Pir~xspatalc populations octurrirlg in areas north and west of Raymond (19911, and Perry (1991). In particular, Oaxaca, Mexico, had very high proportions of Q-phellandrene and low proportions of other constituents. Terpene tshere is disagreement about (I) the taxonomic status compositions of populations of variety longipedz~ncltlatain of P, oocarpa var. ochoferenae and P. patula var. northern Oaxaca were similar to that of the typical variety, longipeduncudata, (2) the extent of the range of P. while those of populations in southern Oaxaca resembled that tecunvmanzz (Styles and McCarter 1988), and (3) the of P. tecanunaanii. Typical P. lecunumanii from populations extent of variation within entities. in Chiapas (Mexico), Guatemala, and southwestern Honduras contained high proportions of a-pinene, carene, limonene, and il-phellaadrene. Popda?inns in southern Mexico, Guatemala, Here we analyze data on te-rpenes obtained from Honduras, Nicaragua, and Belize that contaixied very high populations of the species in an attempt to shed light proportions of a-pinene and low proportions of other on various problems of identification and taxonomy. constituents were judged to be typical P. oocarpa. Other Data previously reported by others and our own populations in Guatemala, Honduras, and Xicaragua tended to resemble both P. oocarpa and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Francisco Morazán
    BetterNDPBA solutions. Guatemala Final Report: Authors Fewer disasters. Safer world. Francisco Morazán Honduras National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment1 Department Profile NDPBA Honduras Report: Department Profile Department: Francisco Morazán Department Capital: Tegucigalpa Area: 8,619 km2 Francisco Morazán is located in central Honduras. The department capital of Tegucigalpa is also the national capital and home to the central government. Tegucigalpa is Honduras' largest and most populous city as well as the nation's political and administrative center. 1,601,291 47.0% 8.7% 77.1 yrs 87.4% Population Population in Illiterate Adult Average Life Household Access (2017) Poverty Population Expectancy to Piped Water Municipality Population Alubarén 5,576 Cedros 26,003 Curarén 20,924 Distrito Central 1,225,043 El Porvenir 23,655 Guaimaca 29,923 La Venta 6,421 Lepaterique 21,767 Maraita 6,927 Marale 9,199 Ojojona 11,017 Orica 14,604 Reitoca 10,761 Sabanagrande 21,781 San Antonio de Oriente 15,598 San Buenaventura 3,029 San Ignacio 9,119 San Juan de Flores 16,857 Santa Ana 16,889 Santa Lucía 14,065 Talanga 36,733 Tatumbla 8,018 Valle de Angeles 18,476 Vallecillo 8,542 Multi-Hazard Risk Rank: Lack of Resilience Rank: Low (11 of 18) Very Low (17 of 18) RVA Component Scores Table 1. Department scores and ranks (compared across departments) for each index. Multi-Hazard Multi-Hazard Risk Lack of Resilience Vulnerability Coping Capacity Exposure Low Very Low Very High Very Low Very High Score Rank (of 18) Score Rank (of 18) Score Rank (of 18) Score Rank (of 18) Score Rank (of 18) 0.458 11 0.314 17 0.747 2 0.298 16 0.670 3 2 NDPBA Honduras Report: Department Profile Multi-Hazard Exposure (MHE) Multi-Hazard Exposure1 Rank: 2 of 18 Departments (Score: 0.747) Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Informacion Catastral Departamento De Francisco
    INFORMACION CATASTRAL DEPARTAMENTO DE FRANCISCO MORAZAN MES : ABRIL MAYO 2018 DATOS DE FECHA DE EXTENSIÓN N° UBICACIÓN DEL INMUEBLE NOMBRE DEL INMUEBLE CLAVE CATASTRAL LUGAR DE INSCRIPCIÓN INSCRIPCION ASIENTO TOMO INSCRIPCIÓN (ÁREA) INSTRUMENTO 1 La Cienega, Santa Lucia, Francisco Escuela Jose Cecilio del Valle M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 18/10/2006 C. Dominio 1 M 3227009 Morazan Pleno 2 Amarateca, Francisco Morazan C.E.B. Divina Providencia M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 24/01/2007 Escritura 1 M 338982 Publica N° 47 ING. JOEL ORLANDO LOPEZ SOSA 30 DE MAYO DEL AÑO 2018 DIRECTOR GENERAL EN FUNCIONES DE LA DIGECEBI FECHA DE ACTUALIZACION 3 Francisco Morazan Instituto Oficial Santiago de M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 06/06/2007 C. Dominio 1 M 336991 Lepaterique Pleno 4 Aldea los Portillos, Sabana Grande C.E.B. Marco Aurelio Soto M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 05/03/2004 C. Dominio 90 4222 Pleno 5 Aldea Horno, San Buena Ventura J.N. Alegrias del Horno M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 11/10/2003 C. Dominio 84 4064 Pleno 6 Col. Altos de los Laureles, A.M.D.C. Escuela Antonio R. Reina M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 28/10/1997 Escritura 40 2744 Publica N° 150 7 Comayaguela,M.D.C Almacenes de libros de M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 13/09/1956 Escritura 142 93 Honduras Publica N° 129 8 Aldea Casco Urbano,Maraita, Francisco J.N. Abelino Andino M.D.C. Francisco Morazan 31/10/2003 C. Dominio 13 4142 Morazan Pleno 9 quebrada, Maraita,F.M. Escuela Arnulfo Salgado M.D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • T~~1N -- X :3 N DD
    E849 A t~~1N -- x :3 n Public Disclosure Authorized D D oyectoBosques y Productividad Rural Public Disclosure Authorized ANÁLISIS AMBIENTAL Noviembre 2003 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized CONTENIDO Página I. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO ............................................................. 2 II. ANTECEDENTES .............................................................. 8 III. OBJETIVO DEL PBPR .................... 13 IV. DESCRIPCION DEL PROYECTO .............................................................. 13 V. COMPONENTES DEL PROYECTO .............................................................. 14 VI. IMPACTOS POSITIVOS DE LAS ACTIVIDADES REALIZADAS ............................................. 19 VII. DESCRIPCION BIOFISICA DEL AREA DE INFLUENCIA .......................................................... 21 VIII. EVALUACION AMBIENTAL ................................................................ 31 IX. MARCO PARA LA EJECUCIÓN DE UN PLAN DE MANEJO AMBIENTAL ............ ............... 35 X. MONITOREO Y EVALUACION .............................................................. 52 XI. ANEXOS .............................................................. 56 PROYECTO DE BOSQUES Y PRODUCTIVIDAD RURAL (PBPR) ANÁLISIS AMBIENTAL 1. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO El Proyecto de Bosques y Productividad Rural (PBPR), está catalogado como "Categoría Ambiental B" dentro de los parámetros del Banco Mundial ya que sus impactos ambientales adversos, tanto en la población humana como en áreas criticas desde el punto de vista ambiental
    [Show full text]
  • Geography and Vegetation Change 29
    Copyright by Jerry Owen Bass, Jr. 2003 The Dissertation Committee for Jerry Owen Bass, Jr. certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: MORE TREES IN THE TROPICS: REPEAT PHOTOGRAPHY AND LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN HONDURAS, 1957-2001 Committee: _________________________________ William E. Doolittle, Supervisor _________________________________ Terry G. Jordan _________________________________ Gregory W. Knapp _________________________________ Steven D. Hoelscher _________________________________ William V. Davidson MORE TREES IN THE TROPICS: REPEAT PHOTOGRAPHY AND LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN HONDURAS, 1957-2001 Jerry Owen Bass, Jr., B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2003 Dedication I dedicate this work to Robert C. West and Terry G. Jordan, two great geographers, and to all the wonderful Hondurans from whom I learned. Acknowledgements I have shared several bottles of Flor de Caña with a small group of geographers who have all played a role in my academic development. The group – Scott Brady, Craig Revels, Taylor Mack, Ricky Samson, and Bill Davidson – shares a love for Honduras, fieldwork, and interesting geography, discussions of which helped in the development of this study. I look forward to a career of collaboration and to more fun and interesting conversations and trips with these people. Bill Davidson introduced me to geography. He and his wife, Sharon, have been good friends to me since. I am ever grateful. Here at UT, many have helped me as I stepped through the Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovery of the Honduran Emerald Amazilia Luciae in Western Honduras
    Bird Conservation International (2010) 20:255–262. ª BirdLife International, 2010 doi:10.1017/S0959270910000389 Rediscovery of the Honduran Emerald Amazilia luciae in western Honduras: insights on the distribution, ecology, and conservation of a ’Critically Endangered’ hummingbird DAVID L. ANDERSON, PAUL HOUSE, ROBERT E. HYMAN, RICARDO STEINER, H. ROSS HAWKINS, SHERRY THORN, MANUEL J. REY, MARIO R. ESPINAL and LEONEL E. MARINEROS Summary The Honduran Emerald Amazilia luciae is endemic to dry forests of Honduras and currently recognised as ‘Critically Endangered.’ Here we present the first modern assessment of its distribution, ecology, and conservation, based partly on our rediscovery of the species in western Honduras and on our observations in three Honduran departments. We found that dry forests inhabited by the emerald differed in structure and species composition between eastern and western Honduras, where we observed emeralds in open-canopied deciduous thorn forests and closed-canopied semi-deciduous woodlands, respectively. We interpret these differences in light of the geological and anthropogenic origins of dry forests in Honduras, and discuss the implications of such origins for the conservation of dry forests. Although our findings expand the known distribution and population size of the species, its status as ‘Critically Endangered’ is warranted due to its restricted distribution in dry forest fragments and increasing human pressures on this habitat. Resumen El Esmeralda Honduren˜ o Amazilia luciae es una especie ende´mica del bosque seco en Honduras que actualmente es considerada Criticamente Amenazada. Presentamos la primera evaluacio´n moderna de su distribucio´n, ecologı´a, y estado de conservacio´n, con base en nuestro reciente redescubrimiento de la especie en el oeste de Honduras y en nuestras observaciones en tres departamentos honduren˜ os.
    [Show full text]
  • Xvii Censo De Población Y Vi De Vivienda 2013
    REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS SECRETARÍA DE ESTADO EN EL DESPACHO PRESIDENCIAL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA XVII CENSO DE POBLACIÓN Y VI DE VIVIENDA 2013 TOMO 123 Municipio de Orica 08-14 Departamento de Francisco Morazán Características Generales de la Población y las Viviendas. D.R. © Instituto Nacional de Estadística Lomas de Guijarro, Edificio Plaza Guijarros, Contiguo al Ministerio Público Tegucigalpa M.D.C. Apdo. Postal: 15031 Sitio Web: www.ine-hn.org Correo electrónico: [email protected] República de Honduras XVII Censo de Población y VI de Vivienda 2013 Tomo 123 Municipio de Orica 08-14, Departamento de Francisco Morazán. Características Generales de la Población y las Viviendas. Impreso en Honduras, C.A. REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS Juan Orlando Hernández Alvarado Presidente de la República CONSEJO DIRECTIVO DEL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Reinaldo Sánchez Rivera Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de la Presidencia Alden Rivera Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Desarrollo Económico Edna Yolani Batres Secretaria de Estado en el Despacho de Salud Marlon Escoto Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Educación Jacobo Paz Bodden Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Agricultura y Ganadería Carlos Alberto Madero Erazo Secretario de Estado en los Despachos de Trabajo y Seguridad Social Julieta Castellanos Rectora de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras Ramón Espinoza Secretario Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología y Director Ejecutivo Instituto Nacional de Estadística. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA DIRECCIÓN EJECUTIVA Ramón
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle, Broadleaf Forests and the Agricultural Modernization Law of Honduras
    ISSN 0854-9818 OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 7 (E) Mar 1996 Cattle, Broadleaf Forests and the Agricultural Modernization Law of Honduras The Case of Olancho William D. Sunderlin and Juan A. Rodríguez CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH office address: Jalan Gunung Batu 5 Bogor 16001 Indonesia mailing address : P.O. Box 6596, JKPWB Jakarta 10065 Indonesia tel.: +62 (251) 34-3652 fax: + 62(251) 32-6433 email: [email protected] The CGIAR System The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) is an infor- mal association of 41 public and private sector donors that supports a network of six- teen international agricultural research institutes, CIFOR being the newest of these. The Group was established in 1971. The CGIAR Centers are part of a global agri- cultural research system which endeavour to apply international scientific capacity to solution of the problems of the world’s disadvantaged people. CIFOR CIFOR was established under the CGIAR system in response to global concerns about the social, environmental and economic consequences of loss and degradation of forests. It operates through a series of highly decentralised partnerships with key institutions and/or individuals throughout the developing and industrialised worlds. The nature and duration of these partnerships are determined by the specific research problems being addressed. This research agenda is under constant review and is sub- ject to change as the partners recognise new opportunities and problems. Contents Acknowledgements Preface Summary 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Xvii Censo De Población Y Vi De Vivienda 2013
    REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS SECRETARÍA DE ESTADO EN EL DESPACHO PRESIDENCIAL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA XVII CENSO DE POBLACIÓN Y VI DE VIVIENDA 2013 TOMO 137 Municipio de Vallecillo 08-28 Departamento de Francisco Morazán Características Generales de la Población y las Viviendas. D.R. © Instituto Nacional de Estadística Lomas de Guijarro, Edificio Plaza Guijarros, Contiguo al Ministerio Público Tegucigalpa M.D.C. Apdo. Postal: 15031 Sitio Web: www.ine-hn.org Correo electrónico: [email protected] República de Honduras XVII Censo de Población y VI de Vivienda 2013 Tomo 137 Municipio de Vallecillo 08-28, Departamento de Francisco Morazán. Características Generales de la Población y las Viviendas. Impreso en Honduras, C.A. REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS Juan Orlando Hernández Alvarado Presidente de la República CONSEJO DIRECTIVO DEL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Reinaldo Sánchez Rivera Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de la Presidencia Alden Rivera Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Desarrollo Económico Edna Yolani Batres Secretaria de Estado en el Despacho de Salud Marlon Escoto Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Educación Jacobo Paz Bodden Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Agricultura y Ganadería Carlos Alberto Madero Erazo Secretario de Estado en los Despachos de Trabajo y Seguridad Social Julieta Castellanos Rectora de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras Ramón Espinoza Secretario Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología y Director Ejecutivo Instituto Nacional de Estadística. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA DIRECCIÓN EJECUTIVA
    [Show full text]