DOCSLIB.ORG

Consolidated Technical Report Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consolidated Technical Report Draft WORK IN PROGRESS December 2011 Consolidated Technical Report Draft December 2011 Consolidated Technical Report Draft This report has been prepared by Femern A/S on the basis of conceptual designs from Rambøll, Arup & TEC and COWI A/S & Obermeyer. Prepared: CIV, NEM Checked: KSA, JGI, ABJ Approved: SLY, HCH Page 2/164 Femern A/S Vester Søgade 10 Tel +45 33 41 63 00 www.femern.com DK-1601 Copenhagen V Fax +45 33 41 63 01 CVR 28 98 65 64 Table of contents 1. THE IMMERSED TUNNEL .......................................................................... 10 Major features ................................................................................................................10 Alignment .......................................................................................................................12 Description of Permanent Works ..................................................................................12 Tunnel elements ........................................................................................................................... 12 Tunnel trench ............................................................................................................................... 14 Technical installations in the tunnel ............................................................................................. 16 Reclamation areas ....................................................................................................................... 19 Fehmarn portal building and ramp area ....................................................................................... 23 Works on land, Fehmarn .............................................................................................................. 28 Drainage systems on Fehmarn .................................................................................................... 30 Portal building and ramp area on Lolland .................................................................................... 30 Works on land, Lolland ................................................................................................................. 36 Drainage system on Lolland ......................................................................................................... 38 Operation and Maintenance ..........................................................................................39 Lolland portal building .................................................................................................................. 39 Fehmarn portal building ............................................................................................................... 39 Lolland toll station ......................................................................................................................... 39 Customs areas on both Fehmarn and Lolland ............................................................................. 40 Construction works .......................................................................................................40 Resource requirements ................................................................................................................ 40 Construction of temporary work harbours .................................................................................... 41 Immersed tunnel construction ...................................................................................................... 46 Construction of portal buildings and ramps .................................................................................. 53 Construction workforce................................................................................................................. 57 Construction schedule .................................................................................................................. 58 Decommissioning and removal ....................................................................................58 The environmental impact .............................................................................................59 2. THE CABLE STAYED BRIDGE .................................................................. 63 Major features ................................................................................................................63 Page 3/164 WORK IN PROGRESS Consolidated Technical Report Alignment .......................................................................................................................64 Description of permanent works ..................................................................................68 Main bridge ................................................................................................................................... 68 Approach bridges ......................................................................................................................... 77 Foundations .................................................................................................................................. 79 Technical installations .................................................................................................................. 82 Land works – Fehmarn................................................................................................................. 89 Land works – Lolland ................................................................................................................... 93 Operation and maintenance facilities ........................................................................................... 94 Construction works .......................................................................................................96 Resource requirements ................................................................................................................ 96 Production sites and temporary work harbour ............................................................................. 96 Production and load out of caissons and pier shafts ................................................................... 99 Support for the construction of the land works on Lolland ......................................................... 102 Summary of the main quantities for temporary structures ......................................................... 102 Production site at Odense/Lindø ................................................................................................ 102 Production and load out of approach bridge girders .................................................................. 105 Production of the pylon caissons for the main bridge ................................................................ 107 Production of superstructure for the main bridge ....................................................................... 109 Marine works for the bridge ........................................................................................................ 112 Construction of the main bridge substructure ............................................................................ 113 Construction of main bridge superstructure ............................................................................... 116 Construction of approach bridge substructure ........................................................................... 117 Construction of approach bridge superstructure ........................................................................ 120 Construction of land works ......................................................................................................... 121 Construction workforce............................................................................................................... 123 Construction schedule ................................................................................................................ 124 Decommissioning and removal .................................................................................. 124 The environmental footprint ....................................................................................... 125 3. THE SUSPENSION BRIDGE .................................................................... 129 Major features .............................................................................................................. 129 The main bridge ......................................................................................................................... 130 Construction Works ..................................................................................................... 135 Construction of main bridge substructure .................................................................................. 135 Page 4/164 Consolidated Technical Report WORK IN PROGRESS Approach bridges ....................................................................................................................... 140 Construction of main bridge superstructure ............................................................................... 140 Construction workforce............................................................................................................... 141 Construction schedule ................................................................................................................ 141 Decommissioning and removal .................................................................................. 142 The environmental footprint ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning for the German Rail Access Route to the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link
    Planning for the German rail access route to the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link (Lubeck - Fehmarn section) 2014-DE-TM-0224-S Scandinavian-Mediterranean Multi-Annual Call Funding Objective 1 Member State(s) involved: Germany C:\Temp\fichemaps\20150630AfterCorrs\2014-DE-TM-022 (Coordinating) Applicant: Bundesministerium fur Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur Implementation schedule: Image found and displayed. Start date: January 2014 End date: December 2020 Requested funding: Total eligible costs: €83 347 500 Requested funding: €41 673 750 Requested EU support: 50.00% Back in 2007 Denmark and Germany agreed to build a fixed link to replace the Recommended funding: ferry route linking their countries and reduce the crossing of the strait of one hour and provide more crossing capacity between their countries. The Action is located Recommended total eligible on the Scandinavian - Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, is a pre-identified €68 447 500 costs: project and is part of a Global Project which aims at connecting central Europe to Recommended funding: €34 223 750 the Nordic countries. While Denmark is responsible to build a combined road and rail tunnel, Germany is going to build the associated rail access route on the Recommended EU support: 50.00% German side. The proposed study is about compiling the final design and approval planning documents which will secure planning consent for the section of double- track electrified line between Lübeck and Puttgarden and will provide the basis for the call to tender for building and construction works. Evaluation Remarks The proposed Action in its reduced scope is extremely relevant and very mature. The bilateral agreement on the construction of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link and its associated access routes was formalised in a treaty signed in September 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives for Upgrading the Nykøbing Falster - Puttgarden Railway Line
    ALTERNATIVES FOR UPGRADING THE NYKØBING FALSTER - PUTTGARDEN RAILWAY LINE JOANNA PAULINA LAZEWSKA, S150897 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet MASTER THESIS AUGUST 2017 ALTERNATIVES FOR UPGRADING THE NYKØBING FALSTER - PUTTGARDEN RAILWAY LINE MAIN REPORT AUTHOR JOANNA PAULINA LAZEWSKA, S150897 MASTER THESIS 30 ETCS POINTS SUPERVISORS STEVEN HARROD, DTU MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING HENRIK SYLVAN, DTU MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING RUSSEL DA SILVA, ATKINS Alternatives for upgrading the Nykøbing F — Puttgarden railway line Joanna Paulina Lazewska, s150897, August 14th 2017 Preface This project constitutes the Master’s Thesis of Joanna Lazewska, s150897. The project is conducted at the Department of Management Engineering of the Technical University of Denmark in the spring semester 2017. The project accounts for 30 ECTS points. The official supervisors for the project have been Head of Center of DTU Management Engineering Henrik Sylvan, Senior Adviser at Atkins Russel da Silva, and Associate Professor at DTU Steven Harrod. I would like to extend my gratitude to Russel da Silva for providing skillful guidance through the completion of project. Furthermore, I would like to thank Henrik Silvan and Steven Harrod for, in addition to guidance, also providing the project with their broad knowledge about economic and operational aspects of railway. In addition, I would like to thank every one who has contributed with material, consultations and guidance in the completion of this project, especially Rail Net Denmark that provided materials and plans, as well as guidance at the technical aspects of the project. A special thank is given to Atkins, which has provided office facilities, computer software, and railway specialists’ help throughout the project. It would not be possible to realize project without their help.
    [Show full text]
  • 555 the Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude
    The Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits Alex G. Oude Elferink* Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, Utrecht University, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The regime of passage through these straits has been the subject of extensiveregulation, raising the question how different applicable instruments interact. Apart from applicable bilateral and multilateral treaties, it is necessaryto take into account the practice of Denmark and Swedenand other interested states, and regulatory activities within the framework of the IMO. The Case ConcerningPassage Through the Great Belt before the ICJ provides insights into the views of Denmark and Finland. The article concludesthat an 1857treaty excludesthe applicabilityof Part III of the LOS Convention to the straits, and that there are a number of difficultiesin assessingthe contents of the regimeof the straits. At the same time, these uncertaintiesdo not seem to have been a complicatingfactor for the adoption of measuresto regulate shipping traffic. Introduction The Danish Straits are the main connection between the Baltic Sea and the world oceans. The straits are of vital importance for the maritime communication of the Baltic states and squarely fall within the legal category of straits used for international navigation For a number of these states the Baltic Sea is the only outlet to the oceans (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland). Although * An earlier version of this article was presented at the international conference, The Passage of Ships Through Straits, sponsored by the Defense Analyses Institute, Athens, 23 October 1999. The author wishes to thank the speakers and participants at that conference for the stimulating discussions, which assisted in preparing the final version of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Küste, Heft 74, 2008
    Die Küste, 74 ICCE (2008), 379-389 379 The Ports of Schleswig-Holstein Hubs of maritime economy between North and Baltic Sea and Continental Europe By GESAMTVERBAND SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEINISCHER HÄFEN C o n t e n t s 1. Introduction . 379 2. Selected Ports as Examples for the Current Situation and Development . 380 2.1 Lübeck – Germany’s largest Baltic Port . 380 2.2 Port Operating Company Brunsbüttel/Harbour Group Brunsbüttel and Glückstadt . 382 2.3 Rendsburg District Harbour . 383 2.4 Flensburg . 384 2.5 Seaport Kiel – Logistics Hub and Germany’s most important Cruise Terminal . 385 2.6 Puttgarden . 387 3. References . 389 1. I n t r o d u c t i o n The range of Schleswig-Holstein ports is manifold: High performance installations for handling large numbers of passengers, bulk and mixed cargo, as well as of Ro-Ro freight are available in the major sea ports. A consolidated network of regular ferry and freight lines provide continuous service to the Northern European States, as well as to Russia and the Baltic States. Destination and source areas of the products handled in these ports extend from the German industrial centres far into mid-, western- and southern European Sates. Nu- merous regionally important harbours open the waterways for Schleswig-Holstein’s trades and industry, afford unobstructed traffic to the islands and create an essential basis for local fisheries. Schleswig-Holstein’s ports along the Lower Elbe between Hamburg and the North Sea are partly located on junctions of the Elbe and the Kiel Canal. Due to their location, the ports of Brunsbüttel, Glückstadt and Wedel, are ideal partners for Metropolitan Hamburg in managing its streams of goods and traffic by water, rail and road.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero-Emission Ferry Concept for Scandlines
    Zero-Emission Ferry Concept for Scandlines Fridtjof Rohde, Björn Pape FutureShip, Hamburg/Germany Claus Nikolajsen Scandlines, Rodby/Denmark Abstract FutureShip has designed a zero-emission ferry for Scandlines’ Vogelfluglinie (linking Puttgarden (Germany) and Rødby (Denmark), which could be deployed by 2017. The propulsion is based on liquid hydrogen converted by fuel cells for the electric propulsion. The hydrogen could be obtained near the ports using excess electricity from wind. Excess on-board electricity is stored in batteries for peak demand. Total energy needs are reduced by optimized hull lines, propeller shape, ship weight and procedures in port. 1. Introduction The “Vogelfluglinie” denotes the connection of the 19 km transport corridor between Puttgarden (Germany) and Rødby (Denmark), Fig.1. This corridor has been served for many years by Scandlines ferries, which transport cars and trains. Four ferries serve two port terminals with specifically tailored infrastructure, Fig.2. The double- end ferries do not have to turn around in port, which contributes to the very short time in port. Combined with operating speed between 15 and 21 kn, departures can be offered every 30 minutes. After decades of unchal- lenged operation, two developments appeared on the horizon which changed the business situation for Scandli- nes fundamentally: 1. New international regulations would curb permissible thresholds for emissions from ships in the Baltic Sea: Starting from 2015, only fuels with less than 0.1% sulphur, i.e. a 90% reduction compared to present opera- tion, will be permissible for Baltic Sea shipping. Starting from 2016, Tier III of MARPOL’s nitrogen oxides (NOx) regulations will become effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 08-2021
    Denmark Travel Guide A Picture of Frederiksborg Castle in Hellerod, Denmark Denmark is situated in northern Europe and it remains surrounded by the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, and Germany. Most of the landmass of this country is occupied by the Jutland peninsula and the remaining 500 islands cover the rest of the country. Denmark, one of the smallest Scandinavian countries, sprinkles a distinct charm with vivacious cities and quiet rustic villages. The most fascinating attraction in Denmark is the capital Copenhagen, which is one of the most vibrant cities in the world. Intriguing sightseeing attractions of Denmark include Tivoli Gardens, Copenhagen, Aarhus, Odense, Sonderborg, Aalborg, Ribe, Vejle, Randers, Skagen, Fredrikshavn, Billund, and Silkeborg. Apart from these major tourist destinations, the whole country of Denmark is stuffed with various attractions like parks, gardens, squares, and fountains entertain the tourists who assemble here from different corners of the world. Getting In Generally, people visit Denmark by air, but one can also prefer the sea or land route. Denmark is served by two major and several minor airports. The airport is connected by train to Copenhagen Central Station, and further to Malmo and the other towns in Sweden. Buses and taxis are also available from here for tourists. Sterling, SAS Scandinavian, and others connect Copenhagen with many cities in Europe and beyond. Easy Jet serves Copenhagen from London and Berlin. British Airways offers regional services to Oslo, Gothenburg, and Stockholm. Sterling and others connect the region with several cities in Europe. If you wish to reach Denmark by train, you must know that there are five direct trains per day from Hamburg to Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fehmarnbelt Tunnel: Regional Development Perspectives 3
    The Fehmarnbelt Tunnel: Regional Development Perspectives 3 PETER LUNDHUS AND CHRISTIAN WICHMANN MATTHIESSEN THE FEHMARNBELT TUNNEL: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ABSTRACT One link was within Denmark; the other two Following these new strategies, the Trans- were between nations. One link connects European Transport Network was adopted The Fehmarnbelt Link between Denmark and heavy economic centres, one joins more thinly and implemented nationally in different ways. Germany, for which in September 2008 a populated regions and the last one links Some countries have been focussing on high- bilateral government treaty was signed, is the peripheral areas. Two of them (the Great Belt speed railway infrastructures, others have last of the three links uniting transportation Link – linking the Danish islands of Zealand improved airports and seaways, and in networks in Northern Europe. The three links and Funen and the Øresund Link between Denmark the three fixed links totalling a (the Great Belt and the Øresund Link being Denmark and Sweden) have been constructed €13 billion investment have been given high the other two) are impressive mega structures and are fully operational. The third – the priority in the national transport action plans. (bridges/ tunnels) spanning international Fehmarnbelt Link between Denmark and The revision of the guidelines and the new waterways. They concentrate traffic flows Germany – was decided in 2008 on a bilateral EU initiatives regarding “Green Corridors” and create strong transport corridors and government level. The three links are intends to substantially affect funding are the basis of new regional development impressive mega structures (bridges/ tunnels) programmes of the TEN-T towards fostering regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fixed Fehmarnbelt Crossing Perceptions in Germany 2014 - 2017
    Björn P. Jacobsen (Editor) The Fixed Fehmarnbelt Crossing Perceptions in Germany 2014 - 2017 The Fixed Fehmarnbelt Crossing: Perceptions in Germany 2014 - 2017 Björn P. Jacobsen Editor The Fixed Fehmarnbelt Crossing Perceptions in Germany 2014 - 2017 Stralsund University of Applied Sciences 2 B.P. Jacobsen (Ed.) Editor Björn P. Jacobsen School of Business Studies Stralsund University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Germany [email protected] © Hochschule Stralsund, 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaption, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now know or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. 3 The Fixed Fehmarnbelt Crossing: Perceptions in Germany 2014 - 2017 Contents 1 The Fixed Fehmarnbelt Crossing: Perceptions in Germany 2014 - 2017 .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • More Maritime Safety for the Baltic Sea
    More Maritime Safety for the Baltic Sea WWF Baltic Team 2003 Anita Mäkinen Jochen Lamp Åsa Andersson “WWF´s demand: More Maritime Safety for the Baltic Sea – Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) status with additional proctective measures needed Summary The scenario of a severe oil accident in the Baltic Sea is omnipresent. In case of a serious oiltanker accident all coasts of the Baltic Sea would be threatened, economic activities possibly spoiled for years and its precious nature even irreversibly damaged. The Baltic Sea is a unique and extremely sensitive ecosystem. Large number of islands, routes that are difficult to navigate, slow water exchange and long annual periods of icecover render this sea especially sensitive. At the same time the Baltic Sea has some of the most dense maritime traffic in the world. During the recent decades the traffic in the Baltic area has not only increased, but the nature of the traffic has also changed rapidly. One important change is the the increase of oil transportation due to new oil terminals in Russia. But not only the number of tankers has increased but also their size has grown. The risk of an oil accident in the Gulf of Finland will increase fourfold with the increase in oil transport in the Gulf of Finland from the 22 million tons annually in 1995 to 90 million tons in 2005. At the same time, the cruises between Helsinki and Tallinn have increased tremendously, and this route is crossing the main routes of vessels transporting hazardous substances. WWF and its Baltic partners see that the whole Baltic Sea needs the official status of a “Particularly Sensitive Sea Area” (PSSA) to tackle the environmental effects and threats associated with increasing maritime traffic, especially oil shipping, in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Mariners
    THE FEHMARNBELT TUNNEL INFORMATION TO MARINERS About the Construction of the Fehmarnbelt Tunnel About the project With a length of 18 km, the Fehmarnbelt Tunnel will be the longest immersed tunnel in the world. It will connect Denmark and Germany and consequently Scandinavia to Central Europe. The Fehmarnbelt Tunnel will significantly improve the mobility of businesses, offer greater opportunities for leisure travellers, cross-border shoppers and all other travellers on both sides of the Fehmarnbelt. The journey through the tunnel will take 10 minutes by car and 7 minutes by train. The fixed link will close a gap in the railway network between Scandinavia and Central Europe. It will boost rail travel and the share of rail freight transport will grow. First a tunnel trench will be dredged to place the tunnel elements. The construction of the tunnel elements will take place at a large factory in Rødbyhavn and the nearby work habour. The materials for casting the tunnel elements are shipped to the factory with the finished tunnel elements floated out to sea for installation in the Fehmarnbelt. 2 Construction activities The offshore construction activities for establish ment of the Fehmarnbelt fixed link as an immersed tunnel will commence in July 2021 and continue until 2027. The offshore construction works will take place along the future tunnel alignment connecting Denmark (Rødby) and Germany (Puttgarden). Once construction of the immersed tunnel is completed, the water depth will be as today and navigational conditions in Fehmarnbelt will return to normal. RØDBYHAVN TUNNEL ALIGNMENT PUTTGARDEN 3 RØDBYHAVN RECLAMATION AREA WORK HABOUR LOLLAND WORK AREAS ACCESS CHANNEL The work areas move as the work progress NOMINAL WORK AREA HOLDING AREA Stationary area but only present during the last part of the construction period (est.
    [Show full text]
  • Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link Hydrographic Services (Fehy)
    FEHMARNBELT HYDROGRAPHY Final Report FEHMARNBELT FIXED LINK HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICES (FEHY) Marine Water – Impact Assessment Hydrography of the Fehmarnbelt Area E1TR0058 - Volume II Prepared for: Femern A/S By: DHI/IOW Consortium in association with LICengineering, Bolding & Burchard and Risø DTU FEHMARNBELT HYDROGRAPHY Responsible editor: FEHY consortium / co DHI Agern Allé 5 DK-2970 Hørsholm Denmark FEHY Project Director: Ian Sehested Hansen, DHI www.dhigroup.com Please cite as: FEHY (2013). Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link EIA. Marine Water. Hydrography of the Fehmarnbel Area - Impact Assessment. Report No. E1TR0058 - Volume II Report: 107 pages May 2013 ISBN 978-87-92416-31-5 Maps: Unless otherwise stated: DDO Orthofoto: DDO®, copyright COWI Geodatastyrelsen (formerly Kort- og Matrikelstyrelsen), Kort10 and 25 Matrikelkort GEUS (De Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland) HELCOM (Helsinki Commission – Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission) Landesamt für Vermessung und Geoinformation Schleswig-Holstein (formerly Landes- vermessungsamt Schleswig-Holstein) GeoBasis-DE/LVermGeo SH Model software geographic plots: Also data from Farvandsvæsenet and Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie Photos: Photos taken by consortium members unless otherwise stated © Femern A/S 2013 All rights reserved. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS DHI: DHI - Water Environment Health BB: Bolding & Burchard IOW: Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde MIKE 3: Commercial 3D numerical modelling tool by DHI GETM: “General Estuarine Transport Model”, applied by Bolding & Burchard MOM: “Modular Ocean Model” code version 3.1 (MOM 3.1), used by IOW Note to the reader: In this report the time for start of construction is artificially set to 1 October 2014 for the tunnel and 1 January 2015 for the bridge alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Report
    Cost–benefit analysis of The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Report The Danish Ministry of Transport Cost–benefit analysis of The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Contents 1 Summary 3 2 Overview 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Results 5 2.3 Report structure 7 3 Assumptions and traffic 8 3.1 Availability and assumptions 8 3.2 Scenarios 8 3.3 Road transport 9 3.4 Rail transport 11 4 The State 13 4.1 Construction costs, EU grants and operations and reinvestments 13 4.2 Revenue, fixed links 15 4.3 Operating costs for trains 15 4.4 Taxes and tax corrections 16 5 Users 18 5.1 Benefits for road traffic 18 5.2 Benefits for rail traffic 19 6 Other impacts 21 6.1 External costs (environment, climate, noise and accidents) 21 6.2 Labour supply impact 21 6.3 Correction to revenues from ferries 22 7 Sensitivity analyses and non-valued impacts 23 8 References 25 Authors Contact Date Thomas Odgaard, Director and Partner Incentive 5 January 2015 Kristian Kolstrup, Manager and Partner Holte Stationsvej 14, 1. DK-2840 Holte, Denmark T: (+45) 61 333 500 E: [email protected] W: incentive.dk 2 Cost–benefit analysis of The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link 1 Summary The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link is one of the largest standalone construction projects currently underway in Denmark. In the same way as the Great Belt Fixed Link and the Øresund Bridge significantly reduced travelling time and brought two regions and countries closer together, a Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link would bring Denmark and Scandinavia closer to Germany and the rest of Europe.
    [Show full text]