DOCSLIB.ORG

FORT Howard, Maryland History and Artifacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FORT Howard, Maryland History and Artifacts Fort Howard History 1896 - 1940 • If you have old pictures, written documents or family history stories about Fort Howard and the soldiers who served there, the Friends of Fort Howard Park would love to see and record them. Please contact us at [email protected]. Developed by the Dundalk – Patapsco Neck Historical Society & Museum and Edgemere - Sparrows Point Recreation Council Fort Howard was built at North Point, where the Patapsco River flows into the Chesapeake Bay. North Point was historically important long before the fort was constructed.. NORTH POINT Old North Point Road was once an Indian trail leading down the “backbone of Patapsco Neck.” Captain John Smith In 1608, during his epic exploration of the Chesapeake Bay, Captain John Smith and his crew are thought to have entered Old Road Bay, just west of North Point. “They adorn themselves with copper beads and paintings. The women have their legs, hands, chests, and faces cunningly tattooed with beasts, and serpents wrought into their flesh with black dots. In each ear they have 3 great holes whereat they hang chains, bracelets or copper. Some of the men wear in those holes a small green and yellow snake, near half a yard in length which crawling and lapping itself about his neck oftentimes would kiss his lips. Others wear a dead rat tied by the tail, the whole skin of a hawk stuffed with the wings abroad or the hand of their enemy dried.” Captain John Smith describing the natives he met during his exploration of the Chesapeake in 1608. Colonial Ships Anchored At North Point In 1683 an Act was passed establishing “North Point” as a terminus for ships moving goods to or from eastern Baltimore County . An Important Route for Goods and People By 1730, Captain Robert North had set up a freight and passenger transport system from Kent Island, across the bay, to the tip of North Point. From there, connecting stage coaches and wagons traveled into Baltimore via Old North Point Road, Trappe Road, and Old Philadelphia Road. THE WAR OF 1812 In 1814, North Point was the landing site for a British invasion force of 4500 who intended to attack and burn Baltimore. A delaying action by American army units took place about 4 miles west of where the British came ashore. That action is called The Battle of North Point. NOTE: THE BRITISH DID NOT ATTACK FORT HOWARD IN 1814 The British landing and the Battle of North Point took place 85 years before Fort Howard was built. FORT HOWARD In 1899, Fort Howard was built at North Point as a coast artillery installation designed to protect Baltimore from assault by enemy naval vessels. Why Did We Need Installations like Fort Howard To Protect Us? Spanish Battleship Pelayo French Battleship Marceau German Battleship Nassau By 1885, Naval guns and steam propulsion had advanced to the point where American coastal cities were vulnerable to attack by vessels like these Battleships. Something had to be done to protect our seaports. The United States Responds To The Threat In 1885, US President Grover Cleveland appointed a panel known as the Board of Fortifications. It was headed by Secretary of War William Endicott. The findings of the board painted a grim picture of existing defenses in its 1886 report and recommended a massive $127 million construction program of breech-loading cannons, mortars, and mines for 29 locations on the US coast-line. William Endicott Fort Howard and other coast artillery fortifications built between 1886 and 1910 are often referred to as Endicott Period. General William P. Craighill After the Civil War war, General Craighill superintended construction of defenses at Baltimore Harbor including upgrades of Forts Carroll and McHenry. He headed the Engineer Office in Baltimore from 1870 to 1895, shepherding the Endicott recommendations through Congress and overseeing river and harbor work in Maryland including the purchases of land at North Point (Fort Howard) and Hawkins Point (Fort Armistead). A portion of the shipping channel from the Chesapeake Bay into Baltimore is named for Gen. Craighill. The Endicott Plan Four Forts To Protect Baltimore The Artillery District of Baltimore included Fort Carroll, Fort Armistead, Fort Smallwood, and Fort Howard The Land For Fort Howard 1896 - The government purchased the property at North Point from the railroad and local farmers. They set about constructing a 150 acre coast artillery installation designed to protect Baltimore from attack by sea. 1899 The Pier and Narrow Gauge Railroad A 900 foot pier was built that allowed construction materials to be transported to the fort on barges and ships. The materials were then loaded on a narrow gauge railroad that ran the length of the pier and into the battery construction sites. 1899-1902 The Gun Emplacements Are Constructed A view of the mortar pits being built A Period Newspaper Illustration The headline says “ The Defenses of the Harbor of Baltimore” The caption reads: “A glance at the work the government is doing on the fortifications at North Point” John Eager Howard After an illustrious In 1901, Fort military career, Col. Howard was Howard went on to named in honor represent Maryland of Col. John in the U.S. Senate Eager Howard. and serve as governor. Col. Howard commanded the Howard County, and rd 3 Maryland Howard Street in Regiment during Baltimore are also the Revolutionary War. named for him. 1901- The Troops Arrive The 21st Company in formation at Fort Howard (circa 1910) In 1901, Fort Howard was garrisoned by four companies of the Coast Artillery Corps. The 21st, 40th, 103rd manned the gun batteries and the 140th maintained the harbor mines and searchlights. Each company included 104 enlisted men and officers. The Guns And Mines Are Installed 1899 - 1907 Battery Nicholson Battery Harris Batteries Clagett & Lazear Battery Key Battery Stricker Harbor Mines Battery Harris Battery Harris was a reinforced concrete rapid fire 5-inch gun battery with two guns mounted on balanced pillar carriages. The carriages were sent to Fort Howard in 1900. These guns were purposed to engage smaller faster craft that could venture out of the shipping channel into shallow water. The battery was deactivated and the guns removed in 1917 for shipment to the war in France. Battery Nicholson Battery Nicholson was a reinforced concrete 6-inch gun battery with two guns mounted on disappearing carriages. These guns had a range of seven miles and were purposed to engage large vessels in the shipping channel. The battery was active for twenty years and then was used for training for several more years. The guns and carriages were removed and shipped to Aberdeen Ordnance Depot in 1927. Batteries Clagett & Lazear Batteries Clagett and Lazear were reinforced concrete 3-inch gun batteries mounted on masking parapet mounts. These smaller rapid fire guns were positioned for protecting harbor minefields from enemy minesweeping vessels. The gun mounts were sent to Fort Howard in 1904. The batteries consisted of two emplacements separated by a main battery structure with a separate magazine for each gun. The batteries were deactivated and the guns removed in 1920. Battery Stricker Battery Stricker was a reinforced concrete 12-inch gun battery with two guns mounted on disappearing gun carriages. The guns fired 1000 lb. projectiles up to eight miles. The guns were purposed to engage capital ships in the shipping channel. The battery was deactivated in 1918 and in 1920 the site was modified to house a range finding station and plotting room for the other batteries. Battery Key Battery Key was a reinforced concrete 12-inch mortar battery with eight mortars mounted on carriages. They were sent to Fort Howard in 1899 and arranged in two mortar pits of four mortars each. The two pits were separated by the main battery structure which housed a power plant and the munitions storage areas. The mortars fired 1000 lb. projectiles at a high angle. The arcing path traveled by these projectiles brought them down on the target at a steep angle. This “plunging fire” was intended to pierce the deck of a ship where the armor was the lightest. The battery was deactivated and the guns shipped to Aberdeen Ordinance Depot in 1927. Gunnery Practice “The gunners who manned these batteries were among the best coastal artillerymen in the world. In 1908 they were credited with setting a world’s record by hitting a moving target over 5,000 yards away, nine out of ten times. The shell that missed was defective.” (From a period newspaper) “To See These Monsters”… “Manning Battery Stricker and charged with firing the 12 inch disappearing rifles, the guns are well handled in drill and practice by the Fortieth Company. To see these monsters load, “go into battery” and fire is well worth going miles to see, for the calm and deliberate way in which the rifle shoots into position, pointing over the parapet, seems to sight like a thing of life, then fires and withdraws back under cover, is impressive in the extreme.” • (From a period newspaper) “13 tons alone” “The 12 inch mortars are odd and unique. Looking like an ink bottle and weighing 13 tons alone without the carriage or mount, their businesslike noses are poked into the air, ready to hurl in majestic flight their 1,046 pound projectile before it landed on the distant objective. Battery Key, named after Francis Scott Key, is composed solely of mortars...” (From a period newspaper) Broken Windows, Stampeding Mules The concussions from firing the 12 inch rifles and the 12 inch mortars would break windows, dislodge water pipes and send scores of mules and horses stampeding through the fort.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf
    American Battlefield Trust Volume 5 BROADSIDE A Journal of the Wars for Independence for Students Fort McHenry and the Birth of an Anthem Of all the battles in American history none is more With a war being fought on the periphery of the Unit- connected with popular culture than the battle of Fort ed States the British, under the influence of Admiral McHenry fought during the War of 1812. The British George Cockburn, decided to bring the war more di- attack on Fort McHenry and the rectly to America by attacking the large garrison flag that could be Chesapeake Region. The British seen through the early morning Navy, with Marines and elements mist, inspired Washington, DC of their army wreaked havoc along lawyer Francis Scott Key to pen the Chesapeake burning numer- what in 1931 would be adopted ous town and settlements. Howev- by Congress as our National An- er, Cockburn had two prizes in them, the Star-Spangled Ban- mind – Washington, DC and Bal- ner. The anthem is played be- timore, Maryland. Retribution for fore countless sports events the burning of York was never far from high school through the from his mind and what a blow he ranks of professional games. thought, would it be to American The story of the creation of the morale if he could torch the still Star-Spangled Banner is as developing American capital. Af- compelling as the story of the ter pushing aside a motley assort- attack on Baltimore. ment of American defenders of the approach to Washington, DC In 1812, a reluctant President at the battle of Bladensburg, Mar- James Madison asked Congress yland, Cockburn and his forces for a Declaration of War against entered the city and put the torch Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide
    S u sq u eh a n n a 1 Westminster R 40 r e iv v e i r 272 R 15 anal & Delaware C 70 ke Chesapea cy a Northeast River c o Elk River n 140 Havre de Chesapeake o 97 Grace City 49 M 26 40 Susquehanna 213 32 Flats 301 13 795 95 1 r e Liberty Reservoir v i R Frederick h 26 s 9 u B 695 Elk River G 70 u 340 n Sa p ssaf 695 rass 83 o Riv w er r e d 40 e v i r R R Baltimore i 13 95 v e r y M c i 213 a dd c le o B R n 70 ac iv o k e R r M 270 iv e 301 r P o to m ac 15 ster Che River 95 P 32 a R t i v a 9 e r p Chestertown 695 s 13 co R 20 1 i 213 300 1 ve r 100 97 Rock Hall 8 Leesburg 97 177 213 Dover 2 301 r ive r R e 32 iv M R 7 a r k got n hy te Ri s a v t 95 er e 295 h r p 189 S e o e C v 313 h ve i r C n R R e iv o er h 13 ka 267 495 uc 113 T Whitehall Bay Bay Bridge 50 495 Greensboro 193 495 Queen Milford Anne 7 14 50 Selby 404 Harrington Bay 1 14 Denton 66 4 113 y P 258 a a B t u rn 404 x te 66 Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfilm Publication M617, Returns from U.S
    Publication Number: M-617 Publication Title: Returns from U.S. Military Posts, 1800-1916 Date Published: 1968 RETURNS FROM U.S. MILITARY POSTS, 1800-1916 On the 1550 rolls of this microfilm publication, M617, are reproduced returns from U.S. military posts from the early 1800's to 1916, with a few returns extending through 1917. Most of the returns are part of Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General's Office; the remainder is part of Record Group 393, Records of United States Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920, and Record Group 395, Records of United States Army Overseas Operations and Commands, 1898-1942. The commanding officer of every post, as well ad commanders of all other bodies of troops such as department, division, brigade, regiment, or detachment, was required by Army Regulations to submit a return (a type of personnel report) to The Adjutant General at specified intervals, usually monthly, on forms provided by that office. Several additions and modifications were made in the form over the years, but basically it was designed to show the units that were stationed at a particular post and their strength, the names and duties of the officers, the number of officers present and absent, a listing of official communications received, and a record of events. In the early 19th century the form used for the post return usually was the same as the one used for regimental or organizational returns. Printed forms were issued by the Adjutant General’s Office, but more commonly used were manuscript forms patterned after the printed forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • CDSG Newsletter - Winter 2021 Page 2
    CDSGThe Newsletter The Coast Defense Study Group, Inc. — Winter 2021 * * * * * CDSG Meeting and Tour Calendar Membership Minute Please advise Terry McGovern of any additions Quentin Schillare or changes at [email protected] As we move into the second month of 2021 the membership 2021 CDSG Special Tour of the Coast Defense Study Group has grown a bit. We now have August 21 - 29 and August 25 - September 3, 2021 403 individual members and 19 organizational members for a Sweden total of 422. This total includes 18 new members, including two Terry McGovern, [email protected] who have rejoined after a short break. It is unknown what impact the coronavirus has had on membership. Membership depends 2021 CDSG Conference on several variables. Some members join and renew to have access October 12 - 17, 2021 to our quarterly publications, others sign up to be eligible for a Charleston/Savannah conference or special tour, and still others with an interest in the Gary Alexander, [email protected] history of seacoast fortifications find us on the Internet or from a friend. Regardless, membership supports all CDSG activities. 2022 CDSG Conference Things are quiet now, but they will pick up in October with the March 30 - April 3, 2022 Charleston/Savannah conference followed six months later in late New Orleans March 2022 with our visit to New Orleans. Quentin Schillare, [email protected] * * * * * 2021 Nominations Committee for the 2023 CDSG Special Tour CDSG Board September Northern Poland Terry McGovern – Corporate Secretary Terry McGovern, [email protected] The CDSG Nominations Committee, Danny Malone, Tom Other Meetings and Tours Batha, and Alex Hall, are seeking board candidates for the full Board to consider by May 1, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the War of 1812 Sources
    Source Guide to the War of 1812 Table of Contents I. Military Journals, Letters and Personal Accounts 2 Service Records 5 Maritime 6 Histories 10 II. Civilian Personal and Family Papers 12 Political Affairs 14 Business Papers 15 Histories 16 III. Other Broadsides 17 Maps 18 Newspapers 18 Periodicals 19 Photos and Illustrations 19 Genealogy 21 Histories of the War of 1812 23 Maryland in the War of 1812 25 This document serves as a guide to the Maryland Center for History and Culture’s library items and archival collections related to the War of 1812. It includes manuscript collections (MS), vertical files (VF), published works, maps, prints, and photographs that may support research on the military, political, civilian, social, and economic dimensions of the war, including the United States’ relations with France and Great Britain in the decade preceding the conflict. The bulk of the manuscript material relates to military operations in the Chesapeake Bay region, Maryland politics, Baltimore- based privateers, and the impact of economic sanctions and the British blockade of the Bay (1813-1814) on Maryland merchants. Many manuscript collections, however, may support research on other theaters of the war and include correspondence between Marylanders and military and political leaders from other regions. Although this inventory includes the most significant manuscript collections and published works related to the War of 1812, it is not comprehensive. Library and archival staff are continually identifying relevant sources in MCHC’s holdings and acquiring new sources that will be added to this inventory. Accordingly, researchers should use this guide as a starting point in their research and a supplement to thorough searches in MCHC’s online library catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Mdl Ilem "7 .Nd
    .. ) ''· I United States Department of the Interior B-8 National Park Service Nadonal Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1\il ..... ii .. - ill ~-. .......w.a ........... ol clip.llily far llldMUI ....- • diArico. Soc ils1rcdaal • Quidtliia .. Conpetinr Noliaml l!gi!w fl!:!!!! (NKloml llllPeer lllllal• 16). ~ mdl ilem "7 .nD,. •a• ill• ....,..... "'- er bJ _.. .. .....-i WarDllca. ltu ilom ** • llppl7 • dlt ,....,,, 111i1s ....,_..... - "NIA" far ... awlicoblc." Far f\aUca, ICylca, _..., ud - ol 1ipi"'-e, - cllllJ die c:MepW ud ........... liled im llliJ ........... Far ..idibanll ... - CGllinatlclli ..... (J'Gr9 IG«Xla). ,.,,. Ill --.. l. Name ol Property historic name Fort McHenry other names I sate number Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine Street & number Locust Point, at east end of Port Avenue l ] not tor pubiicabon Cify, town Bal hmore Lil VIClDltY state Matyaana coae 2 4 county Baltimore (City) coae 510 bp cooe 21230 Ownership or Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property [ ) private [ 1 build.ing(s) Contributing• Noncontributing [ ) public-local [ J) district 004 006 buildings [ 1 public-State [ 1 site 001 ooo sites [ J) public-Federal [ 1 structure 031 006 structures [ J object 006 003 objects 042 015 Total Name of related multiple property listing: N/A Number or contributing resources previomly listed In the National Register 001 * Please note that the contributing resources generally correspond to Fort McHenry' s List of Classified Structures (LCS ) . In some instances, single LCS entries encompass multiple resources (e.g . the water battery guns and emplacements (LCS no. 81221) consist of 11 cannons and 24 gun emplacements, but are counted as one contributing .f.t~~ Agmcy Catilicatioa ere y ce DO of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering propenies in cbe National Register of Hisloric Places and meeu d:le procedural and professional requirements let forth in 36 CPR Put 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Enforcement & Compliance Report
    Maryland Department of the Environment ANNUAL ENFORCEMENT & COMPLIANCE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 Larry Hogan Boyd K. Rutherford Ben Grumbles Horacio Tablada Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary Deputy Secretary TABLE OF CONTENTS Section One – REPORT BASIS AND SUMMARY INFORMATION 3 Statutory Authority and Scope 4 Organization of the Report 4 MDE Executive Summary 5 MDE Performance Measures – Executive Summary 6 Enforcement Workforce 6 Section 1-301(d) Penalty Summary 7 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2004 8 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2005 – 2010 9 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2011 – 2017 10 MDE Enforcement Actions Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2017 11 MDE Penalties Historical Annual Summary Chart FY 1998 - 2017 11 MDE’s Enforcement and Compliance Process and Services to Permittees 12 and Businesses The Enforcement and Compliance Process 12 Enforcement Process Flow Chart 13 Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) 14 Contacts or Consultations with Businesses 15 Compliance Assistance 15 Consultations with Businesses 15 Section Two - ADMINISTRATION DETAILS 17 Measuring Enforcement and Compliance 18 Performance Measures Table Overview and Definitions 19 Enforcement and Compliance Performance Measures Table Format 23 Air and Radiation Administration (ARA) 25 ARA Executive Summary 26 ARA Performance Measures 27 Ambient Air Quality Control 28 Air Quality Complaints 34 Asbestos 38 Radiation Machines 42 Radioactive Materials Licensing and Compliance 46 Land
    [Show full text]
  • Real Stories Baltimore County History
    REAL STORIES FROM BALTIMORE COUNTY HISTORY Data Obtained hvJ the Teachers and Children of Baltimore County (Maryland) Schools IDustrated with drawings by 7th and 8th Grade Pupils Revised and Adapted by ISOBEL DAVIDSON, Supercisor of Primary Grades, Baltimore County School.s. ---0--- BALTIMORE WARWICK & YORK, INC. 1917. Copyrighted, 1917, by· WARWICK & YORK, INc. REAL STORIES FROM BALTIMORE COUNTY HISTORY CONTENTS Page A FOREWORD ················~···························~---························ . 1 I. ONCE UPON A TIME IN OUR., ~OMMUNITY 1. Neighborhood Changes ....... .-........................................ 5 2. Our Country Long ~,g-0................................................ 9 3. Indians of Marylat'lct: Susquehannoughs and Al- gonqu1ns ......................................... .. ......................... 10 4. Con1ing of the First White 1'Ian-Captain John Smith in the Chesapeake . .: ........................ ~............. 13 5. How Maryland Was Named ........................................ 16 II. ONCE UPON A TIME IN BALTIMORE COUNTY 1. The Changing Boundary Line...................................... 19 2. The Early Pioneers...................................................... 20 3. Colonial Times .............................................................. 22 4. County Seats: Old Baltimore, Foster's Neck, Joppa, Baltimore Town, Towson ........................................ 37 III. ONCE UPON A TIME IN BALTIMORE TowN ........................ 46 IV. ONcE UPON A TIME IN OuR TowN AND V1c1NITY 1. Green Spring. Valley-1743.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscape Report for Fort Mchenry National Monument and Historic Shrine
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE SITE HISTORY, EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT MCHENRY FORT M C H ENRY N ATIONAL M ONUMENT AND HISTORIC S HRINE Prepared by: Mark Davison, Historical Landscape Architect, Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation Eliot Foulds, Historical Landscape Architect, Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation August 2004 CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE The Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation promotes the preservation of significant landscapes through research, planning, stewardship, and education. The Center accomplishes its mission in collaboration with a network of partners including national parks, universities, government agencies and private nonprofit organizations. Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation 99 Warren Street Brookline, Massachusetts 02445 617.566.1689 www.nps.gov/frla/oclp.htm Publication Credits: Information in this report may be copied and used with the condition that credit be given to the authors, and the Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation. This report has been prepared for in-house use, and will not be made available for sale. Photographs and graphics may not be reproduced for re-use without the permission of the owners or repositories noted in the captions. Cover Photo: Fort McHenry and Patapsco River, looking east, by the authors, July 2003. NPS / FOMC - D62 August. 2004 ii CONTENTS LIST OF
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office
    U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Historic Light Station Information MARYLAND BALTIMORE LIGHT Location: South entrance to Baltimore Channel, Chesapeake Bay, off the mouth of the Magothy River Date Built: Commissioned 1908 Type of Structure: Caisson with octagonal brick dwelling / light tower Height: 52 feet above mean high water Characteristics: Flashing white with one red sector Foghorn: Yes (initially bell, replaced with a horn by 1923) Builder: William H. Flaherty / U. S. Fidelity and Guarantee Co. Appropriation: $120,000 + Range: white – 7 miles, red – 5 miles Status: Standing and Active Historical Information: This is one of the last lighthouses built on the Chesapeake Bay. The fact that it was built at all is a testimony to the importance of Baltimore as a commercial port. The original appropriation request to Congress for a light at this location was made in 1890 and $60,000 was approved four years later. However, bottom tests of proposed sites showed a 55 foot layer of semi-fluid mud before a sand bottom was hit. This extreme engineering challenge made construction of a light within the proposed cost impossible. An additional $60,000 was requested and finally appropriated in 1902. Even then, the project had to be re-bid because no contractor came forth within the allotted budget. Finally, the contract was awarded to William H. Flaherty (who had built the Solomon’s Lump and Smith Point lights). The materials were gathered and partially assembled at Lazaretto Point Depot, then towed to the site and lowered to the bottom in September 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the US Army Corps of Engineers
    History of the US Army Corps of Engineers Course No: B07-002 Credit: 7 PDH Robert Steelhammer, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: A History Headquarters U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Office of History Alexandria, Virginia 2008 This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of ISBN 978-0-16-079585-5 is for U.S. Government Printing Office Official Editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. It is prohibited to use the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers seal, as it appears on the cover, on any republication of this material without the express, written permission of the Office of History, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any person using official seals and logos in a manner inconsistent with the Federal Regulations Act is subject to penalty. Foreword his illustrated history of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers provides an overview of many of the missions that engineers have performed in support of the U.S. Army and the Nation since the early days of the T American Revolution. A permanent institution since 1802, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has effect- ively and proudly responded to changing defense requirements and has played an integral part in the development of the Nation.
    [Show full text]