DOCSLIB.ORG

Tarnava Mare 2015 Biodiversity Survey Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tarnava Mare 2015 Biodiversity Survey Summary Report Tarnava Mare 2015 Biodiversity Survey Summary Report Report editor: Dr Bruce Carlisle – Geography & Environment, Northumbria University. Science team: Stephen Brennan, Silvia Cojocaru, Chloe Dalglish, Paul Leafe, Chris Ledbury, Olivia Norfolk, James O’Neill, Huma Pearce, Helen Rawlinson, Warwick Wainwright. Assisted by: Georgina Scott, Serban Tudor, Marcela Mann, Dragos Luntraru, Alin-Marius Nicula, Mihaela Hojbota, Andrei Nicoara, Bogdan Ciortan. With thanks to all the staff at Fundatia ADEPT, Cristi Malos – Babes-Bolyai University, all the dissertation students and volunteers. Contents 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Farmer interviews ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Land cover ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Grassland plants ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.4 Grassland butterflies ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Birds ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Small mammals ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.7 Large mammals ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.8 Bats ................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.0 Vital statistics .................................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Farm survey ..................................................................................................................................... 15 5.0 Grassland plants .............................................................................................................................. 20 6.0 Grassland butterflies ....................................................................................................................... 27 7.0 Birds ................................................................................................................................................. 33 8.0 Small mammals ............................................................................................................................... 44 9.0 Large Mammals ............................................................................................................................... 45 9.1 Camera Trap Survey .................................................................................................................... 45 9.2 Observation of large mammal signs ............................................................................................ 47 Page 1 1.0 Introduction This report summarises the data gathered by Operation Wallacea’s Transylvania project during the summer of 2015. This was the third year of the project, based on an annual survey in the Tarnava Mare Natura 2000 site to assess the effectiveness of maintaining the traditional agricultural practices in protecting this outstanding landscape and its species. The Operation Wallacea surveys provide annual data on a range of biodiversity and farming criteria. These data can then be used by Fundatia ADEPT, a Romania-based NGO, to help guide their farming and conservation initiatives. The report gives a snapshot of the 2015 situation in terms of agriculture and biodiversity. Data from 2013 and 2014 are shown for comparison where appropriate. Changes in the data over a period of several years can be used to reveal how the biodiversity of Tarnava Mare is changing, for example in response to changing agricultural practices. Caution must be used when comparing differences between 2015, 2014 and 2013, as there are a variety of factors which can cause the numbers to be different, including slight changes to the methodology (see section 2), differences in the dates of the surveys, differences in climate and weather and natural population fluctuations. While it is still too early in the project to confidently investigate change over time, the data from the first three years can start to be used to investigate spatial variation. For example, biodiversity and land cover of the surveyed villages can be compared to investigate the influence of land cover (as a function of land use) on the composition and abundance of species. Section 2 “Methods” outlines the fieldwork methods used. Section 3 “Vital Statistics” presents a few key indicator figures, to give a very brief overview of the data and to compare the surveyed villages. Sections 4 to 9 give a more detailed summary of the data gathered by each survey team. KEY MESSAGES There are many substantial increases and decreases in a wide variety of taxa, as well as taxa that have not changed. Much of this will be natural fluctuation or “noise” in the data. Some changes could be early warning signs of important changes to biodiversity and need to be followed closely in coming years. These include: Signs of a general trend of declining indicator plant abundance Declining butterfly diversity at Nou Sasesc A decrease in red-backed shrike abundance at all villages 8 grassland specialist bird species declining in numbers but 9 increasing Small mammal population crash Page 2 2.0 Methods Some adjustments to methodologies were made in response to the experience gained during the first year of the project. See the 2014 summary report for further detail of these adjustments. Consequently 2013 data is not always directly comparable to data from subsequent years. The methods used in 2014 remained the same in 2015 to a great extent. However, the order in which the villages were surveyed changed slightly with Apold and Malancrav being switched around for logistical reasons. The weather conditions vary from year to year. The start of the 2015 fieldwork season was cool and wet, particularly while surveying at Richis and Nou Sasesc. This had an impact on the number of surveys that could be undertaken, and will also have had an influence on vegetation phenology and the abundance and activity of wildlife. Fieldwork was undertaken over an 8 week period from 18 June to 12 August 2015, in eight villages within the Tarnava Mare Natura 2000 site. In total, 48 days fieldwork were undertaken, with 6 days per village. Table 2.1 lists the villages and the respective dates for 2013, 2014 and 2015. Much of the survey work was carried out along “the transects” which are 3 linear routes per village. Each route was selected with the aim of traversing land covers and land uses that are representative of the village’s surroundings. The routes are constrained by accessibility. The “central transect” is approximately 4km long and runs along the valley floor, upstream and downstream of the village. This transect runs through the village, usually alongside a road, near to the stream, and through more intensely farmed land. “West” and “east” transects are approximately 6km long and each takes a roughly semi-circular route from the valley floor up the valley sides, usually into less intensely farmed land, meadow grassland, pasture and woodland. There are no significant differences between the 2013, 2014 and 2015 transects. There are seven main survey teams covering farmer interviews, grassland plants and land cover mapping, grassland butterflies, birds, small mammals, large mammals and bats. Further details of the methods of each team, and any notable alteration of methods, are given in the following sections. Table 2.1. Survey schedules. Village 2013 Survey Dates Days 2014 Survey Dates Days 2015 Survey (N days) difference (N days) difference Dates (N days) Richis 20 to 22 July (3) -31 19 to 24 June (6) -1 18 to 23 June (6) Nou Sasesc 16 to 18 July (3) -20 26 to 30 June (5) -1 25 to 30 June (6) Mesendorf 2 to 4 July (3) +1 3 to 8 July (6) -1 2 to 7 July (6) and 3 to 5 August (3) -31 Viscri 6 to 8 July (3) +4 10 to 14 July (5) -1 9 to 14 July (6) and 30 July to 1 August (3) -20 Crit 27 to 30 June (4) +20 17 to 22 July (6) -1 16 to 21 July (6) and 25 to 28 July (4) -8 Daia --- No full survey --- 24 to 28 July (5) -1 23 to 28 July (6) Apold --- No full survey --- 7 to 11 August (5) -8 30 July to 4 August (6) Malancrav 11 to 14 July (4) +20 31 July to 5 August +7 6 to 11 August (6) (6) TOTAL 27 June to 5 August (30) +8 19 June to -1 18 June to 12 August (48) 11 August (48) Page 3 2.1 Farmer interviews The farmer interviews involved asking a fixed set of questions covering topics such as farm characteristics (size, age etc.), crops grown, livestock, hay cutting dates and so on. The number of farmers interviewed varied amongst the villages, depending on the presence and effectiveness of a local person to make contacts, the willingness of farmers to participate, and how busy the farmers were. There was no strategy to selecting farmers – the participants
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inter-Parasitic Interactions in Myrmica Ants: Ectoparasitic Fungus Affecting the Success of Socially Parasitic Caterpillars
    Inter-Parasitic Interactions in Myrmica Ants: Ectoparasitic Fungus Affecting the Success of Socially Parasitic Caterpillars András Tartally ( [email protected] ) University of Debrecen Norbert Szabó University of Debrecen Anna Ágnes Somogyi University of Debrecen Ferenc Báthori University of Debrecen Danny Haelewaters Ghent University András Mucsi Bezerédi str. 10, Cibakháza Ágnes Fürjes-Mikó University of Sopron-Forest Research Institute David R. Nash University of Copenhagen Research Article Keywords: Complex interactions, Maculinea, Myrmica scabrinodis, Parasitology, Phengaris alcon, Rickia wasmannii Posted Date: July 20th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-712976/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/25 Abstract Exploitation of organisms by multiple parasite species is common in nature, but interactions among parasites have rarely been studied. Myrmica ants are rich in parasites. Among others, the ectoparasitic Rickia wasmannii fungus and the socially parasitic caterpillars of myrmecophilous Phengaris butteries often infect the same Myrmica colonies. In this study, we examined the effects of R. wasmannii on the adoption, long-term development, and survival of P. alcon. In laboratory conditions, caterpillars introduced into nests of Myrmica scabrinodis uninfected with R. wasmannii survived signicantly longer compared to caterpillars introduced into infected nests. In the eld, joint infection was less common than expected if both parasites exploited M. scabrinodis colonies independently. Pre-pupal caterpillars of P. alcon were somewhat larger in nests infected with R. wasmannii than those found in uninfected nests. Based on these results it seems that R. wasmannii infection of M. scabrinodis affects the survival and development of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear and Non-Linear Effects of Goldenrod Invasions on Native Pollinator and Plant Populations
    Biol Invasions (2019) 21:947–960 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1874-1 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) ORIGINAL PAPER Linear and non-linear effects of goldenrod invasions on native pollinator and plant populations Dawid Moron´ . Piotr Sko´rka . Magdalena Lenda . Joanna Kajzer-Bonk . Łukasz Mielczarek . Elzbieta_ Rozej-Pabijan_ . Marta Wantuch Received: 28 August 2017 / Accepted: 7 November 2018 / Published online: 19 November 2018 Ó The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The increased introduction of non-native and native plants. The species richness of native plants species to habitats is a characteristic of globalisation. decreased linearly with goldenrod cover, whereas the The impact of invading species on communities may abundance and species richness of bees and butterflies be either linearly or non-linearly related to the decreased non-linearly with increasing goldenrod invaders’ abundance in a habitat. However, non-linear cover. However, no statistically significant changes relationships with a threshold point at which the across goldenrod cover were noted for the abundance community can no longer tolerate the invasive species and species richness of hover flies. Because of the non- without loss of ecosystem functions remains poorly linear response, goldenrod had no visible impact on studied. We selected 31 wet meadow sites that bees and butterflies until it reached cover in a habitat encompassed the entire coverage spectrum of invasive of about 50% and 30–40%, respectively. Moreover, goldenrods, and surveyed the abundance and diversity changes driven by goldenrod in the plant and of pollinating insects (bees, butterflies and hover flies) D. Moron´ (&) Ł. Mielczarek Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Department of Forests and Nature, Krako´w Municipal Academy of Sciences, Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Krako´w, Greenspace Authority, Reymonta 20, 30-059 Krako´w, Poland Poland e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Garden Butterflies of the Upper Thames Region Summer Very Top Tip
    Identifying the Garden Butterflies of the Upper Thames Region Summer Very Top Tip Identifying butterflies very often depends on details at the wing edges (including the margins), but this is less helpful with some summer species. Note the basic ground colour to get a clue to the family and then look at wing edges and eye spots for further identification. The butterfly’s size and actions, plus location and time of year are all helpful . Butterflies that deliberately chase others (and large flies etc.) are usually male. Butterflies spending a long time flying around and investigating an individual plant are probably female. Peacock Red Admiral & Painted Lady The wing tips of PL separate it from Fritillaries Red Admiral & Painted Lady Comma Painted Lady Small Tortoiseshell Speckled Wood Chequered margins andSpeckled large blotches of yellowy creamWood on chocolate background. Often seen basking in patches of sun in areas of dappled sunlight. Rarely visits flowers. Comma Small Tort Wavy outline Blue-ish margin Peacock Speckled Wood Usually less contrasty than the rest with various eyespots and With a straighter border between Blue-ish margin prominent veins Brimstone and Clouded Yellow B has pointy wing tips CY has a white centre to brown spot on hind wing Black tips on upper visible in flight. Small White m and Large White f Very small amounts of dark scales on leading edge of forewing of Small W rarely turn around tip, but Large has large L of black scales that extend half way down the wing Female Brimstone and Green-veined White Brimstone fem looks white in flight but slightly greenish-yellow when settled.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Indicators for UK Butterflies
    Ecological Indicators 76 (2017) 184–193 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Indicators jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind Original Article Urban indicators for UK butterflies a,b,∗ a c b Emily B. Dennis , Byron J.T. Morgan , David B. Roy , Tom M. Brereton a School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK b Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, UK c Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, UK a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Most people live in urban environments and there is a need to produce abundance indices to assist Received 26 October 2016 policy and management of urban greenspaces and gardens. While regional indices are produced, with Received in revised form the exception of birds, studies of the differences between urban and rural areas are rare. We explore 19 December 2016 these differences for UK butterflies, with the intention to describe changes that are relevant to people Accepted 10 January 2017 living in urban areas, in order to better connect people with nature in support of conservation, provide a Available online 3 February 2017 measure relevant to human well-being, and assess the biodiversity status of the urban environment. Transects walked under the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme are classified as urban or rural, using Keywords: Abundance a classification for urban morphological zones. We use models from the Generalised Abundance Index Biodiversity family to produce urban and rural indices of relative abundance for UK butterfly species.
    [Show full text]
  • Land-Use Changes, Farm Management and the Decline of Butterflies Associated with Semi-Natural Grasslands in Southern Sweden
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal Nature Conservation Land-use6: 31–48 (2013) changes, farm management and the decline of butterflies.... 31 doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.6.5205 APPLIED ECOLOGY http://www.pensoft.net/natureconservation Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation Land-use changes, farm management and the decline of butterflies associated with semi-natural grasslands in southern Sweden Sven G. Nilsson1, Markus Franzén1,2, Lars B. Pettersson1,3 1 Biodiversity Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden 2 UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser- Straße 4, D-06120 Halle, Germany 3 Swedish Butterfly Monitoring Scheme, Lund University, Ecology Buil- ding, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden Corresponding author: Lars B. Pettersson ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Penev | Received 26 March 2013 | Accepted 30 October 2013 | Published 18 November 2013 Citation: Nilsson SG, Franzén M, Pettersson LB (2013) Land-use changes, farm management and the decline of butterflies associated with semi-natural grasslands in southern Sweden. Nature Conservation 18: 31–48. doi: 10.3897/ natureconservation.6.5205 Abstract Currently, we are experiencing biodiversity loss on different spatial scales. One of the best studied taxo- nomic groups in decline is the butterflies. Here, we review evidence for such declines using five systematic studies from southern Sweden that compare old butterfly surveys with the current situation. Additionally, we provide data on butterfly and burnet moth extinctions in the region’s counties. In some local areas, half of the butterfly fauna has been lost during the last 60–100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Moths
    The group of members at Holtspur who had just been clearing scrub, refreshing the information boards, clearing the footpath of obstructions, removing seedling shrubs from the ‘wrong place’ and planted them into the central hedge and the windbreak on Lower Field, clearing dogwood from Triangle Bank, making a small scallop into the top hedge, checking wobbly posts and making repairs to the fencing. Nick Bowles Planting disease resistant elms in the Planting disease resistant elms in Lye Valley, Oxon - in the rain! Bottom Wood, Bucks. Peter Cuss Peter Cuss I will be pleased to see the spring (which seems very slow to arrive this year) for a variety of reasons. One, is to relax after the large number of work parties. I haven’t kept a list of the number of the tasks we attended in previous winters but this year we advertised and we had members working at 46 conservation tasks. As a group of people that love butterflies and moths (and therefore cherish the places in which they live) we can take pride and feel relief, that our expertise has positively influenced the management of those places. Our volunteers have acted to halt, and hopefully reverse, the decline in numbers and their efforts have been magnificent. Our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/Butterflies.Berkshire.Buckinghamshire.Oxfordshire/)bears witness to the large numbers of members involved. Furthermore, I haven’t included events such as Elm tree planting (by small groups of members), the nurturing of seedlings by many members, the preparation of display board information for our reserve and a number of other largely individual acts which took place during the same winter season.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Microsatellite Loci and Optimization of a Multiplex Assay
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Development of microsatellite loci and optimization of a multiplex assay for Latibulus argiolus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), the specialized parasitoid of paper wasps Agata Kostro‑Ambroziak1*, Anna Siekiera2, Magdalena Czajkowska3, Jan J. Pomorski2 & Hanna Panagiotopoulou2 Microsatellite loci are commonly used markers in population genetic studies. In this study, we present 40 novel and polymorphic microsatellite loci elaborated for the ichneumonid parasitoid Latibulus argiolus (Rossi, 1790). Reaction condition optimisation procedures allowed 14 of these loci to be co-amplifed in two PCRs and loaded in two multiplex panels onto a genetic analyser. The assay was tested on 197 individuals of L. argiolus originating from ten natural populations obtained from the host nests of paper wasps. The validated loci were polymorphic with high allele numbers ranging from eight to 27 (average 17.6 alleles per locus). Both observed and expected heterozygosity values were high, ranging between 0.75 and 0.92 for HO (mean 0.83) and from 0.70 to 0.90 for HE (mean 0.85). The optimized assay showed low genotyping error rate and negligible null allele frequency. The designed multiplex panels could be successfully applied in relatedness analyses and genetic variability studies of L. argiolus populations, which would be particularly interesting considering the coevolutionary context of this species with its social host. Te ichneumonid wasp Latibulus argiolus (Rossi, 1790) of the subfamily Cryptinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumo- nidae) is a specialized ectoparasitoid of social paper wasps (Polistes Latreille, 1802) with respect to its larvae and pupae1,2. Because parasitoids use only one host for their full larval development3, they are under strong natural selection that in turn leads to optimal exploitation of the host 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies & Flowers of the Kackars
    Butterflies and Botany of the Kackars in Turkey Greenwings holiday report 14-22 July 2018 Led by Martin Warren, Yiannis Christofides and Yasemin Konuralp White-bordered Grayling © Alan Woodward Greenwings Wildlife Holidays Tel: 01473 254658 Web: www.greenwings.co.uk Email: [email protected] ©Greenwings 2018 Introduction This was the second year of a tour to see the wonderful array of butterflies and plants in the Kaçkar mountains of north-east Turkey. These rugged mountains rise steeply from Turkey’s Black Sea coast and are an extension of the Caucasus mountains which are considered by the World Wide Fund for Nature to be a global biodiversity hotspot. The Kaçkars are thought to be the richest area for butterflies in this range, a hotspot in a hotspot with over 160 resident species. The valley of the River Çoruh lies at the heart of the Kaçkar and the centre of the trip explored its upper reaches at altitudes of 1,300—2,300m. The area consists of steep-sided valleys with dry Mediterranean vegetation, typically with dense woodland and trees in the valley bottoms interspersed with small hay-meadows. In the upper reaches these merge into alpine meadows with wet flushes and few trees. The highest mountain in the range is Kaçkar Dağı with an elevation of 3,937 metres The tour was centred around the two charming little villages of Barhal and Olgunlar, the latter being at the fur- thest end of the valley that you can reach by car. The area is very remote and only accessed by a narrow road that winds its way up the valley providing extraordinary views that change with every turn.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Butterfliesoflondona
    About the London Natural History Society The London Natural History Society traces its history back to 1858. The Society is made up of a number of active sections that provide a wide range of talks, organised nature walks, coach trips and other activities. This range of events makes the LNHS one of the most active natural history societies in the world. Whether it is purely for recreation, or to develop field skills for a career in conservation, the LNHS offers a wide range of indoor and outdoor activities. Beginners are welcome at every event and gain access to the knowledge of some very skilled naturalists. LNHS LEARNING On top of its varied public engagement, the LNHS also provides a raft of publications free to members. The London Naturalist is its annual journal with scientific papers as well as lighter material such as book reviews. The annual London Bird Report published since 1937 sets a benchmark for publications of this genre. Furthermore, there is a quarterly Newsletter that carries many trip reports and useful announcements. The LNHS maintains its annual membership subscription at a modest level, representing fantastic value for money. Butterflies Distribution and Use of this PDF This PDF may be freely distributed in print or electronic form and can be freely uploaded to private or commercial websites provided it is kept in its entirety without any changes. The text and images should of London not be used separately without permission from the copyright holders. LNHS Learning materials, with the inner pages in a poster format for young audiences, are designed to be printed off and used on a class room wall or a child’s bedroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathlands a Lost World?
    Heathlands A Lost World? Mattias Lindholm Institutionen för biologi och miljövetenskap Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten Akademisk avhandling för filosofie doktorsexamen i naturvetenskap med inriktning biologi, som med tillstånd från Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten kommer att offentligt försvaras fredag den 24 maj 2019, kl. 10.00 i Hörsalen, Botanhuset, Institutionen för biologi och miljövetenskap, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22B, Göteborg. Fakultetsopponent är Docent Erik Öckinger, Institutionen för ekologi, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala. Heathlands – A Lost World? Mattias Lindholm Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Box 461 SE405 30 Göteborg Sweden E-mail: [email protected] © Mattias Lindholm 2019 Cover: Heathland. Illustration by Per Axell ISBN 978-91-7833-446-9 (Printed) ISBN 978-91-7833-447-6 (PDF) http://hdl.handle.net/2077/59796 Printed by BrandFactory Group AB 2019 Till Valle och Arvid Figure 1. Arnica montana. Illustration by Kerstin Hagstrand-Velicu. Lindholm M. (2019) Heathlands – A Lost World? Mattias Lindholm, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE405 30 Göteborg, Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Keywords Heathland, Calluna, Conservation, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Lycosidae, Management, Restoration, Conservation strategy Abstract Heathland is a familiar landscape type in southwest Sweden. It is open with few trees, and the vegetation is dominated by dwarf-shrubs growing on nutrient-poor soils. Dry heaths with Heather Calluna vulgaris and wet heaths with Bell Heather Erica tetralix are common vegetation communities in the heathland, and they often form mosaics. The heathland landscape is highly threatened, with large substantial areal losses of 95% in Sweden since the 1800s. Heathland supports around 200 red-listed species, including plants, insects, birds and reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Term Review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 in Relation to Target 3A – Agriculture
    Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid- term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture Final Report 19th June 2017 Funded by European Commission, DG Environment In collaboration with 2 Disclaimer: The arguments expressed in this report are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinion of any other party. The report as a whole should be cited as follows: Siriwardena, G. and Tucker, G. (eds) (2017) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. The following individual chapters should be cited as follows: Chapter 2: Siriwardena, G and Pringle, H (2017) Development of a methodology for the assessment of potential agriculture-related drivers on the status of habitats and species. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 25-48. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 3: Pringle, H, Koeble, R, Paracchini M L, Rega, C, Henderson, I, Noble, D, Gamero, A, Vorisek, P, Škorpilová, J, Schmucki, R, Siriwardena, G, Allen, B, and Tucker, G (2017) Review of data sources and preparation of a metadatabase. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 49-60.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee
    Public Document Pack NONSUCH PARK JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Monday 21 November 2016 at 10.00 am Nonsuch Mansion House The members listed below are summoned to attend the Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee meeting, on the day and at the time and place stated, to consider the business set out in this agenda. Committee Members Councillor Mary Burstow, London Borough of Sutton (Chairman) Councillor Richard Broadbent, London Borough of Sutton Councillor Alex Clarke, Epsom & Ewell Borough Council Councillor Graham Dudley, Epsom & Ewell Borough Council Councillor David Hicks, London Borough of Sutton Councillor Mike Teasdale, Epsom & Ewell Borough Council Yours sincerely Clerk to the Committee For further information, please contact Sandra Dessent - 01372 732121 or [email protected] Frances Rutter, Solicitor Clerk to the Committee AGENDA 1. ADJOURNMENT FOR PUBLIC SPEAKING (IF REQUIRED) Prior to commencement of the meeting a period of 15 minutes will be put aside to allow members of the public who have pre-registered to do so, the opportunity to ask questions. For further details, contact Sandra Dessent, Democratic Services Officer, on 01372 732000. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Members are asked to declare the existence and nature of any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests in respect of any item of business to be considered at the meeting. 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING (Pages 5 - 10) The Committee is asked to confirm as a true record the Minutes of the Meeting of the Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee held on 27 June 2016. 4. RESTORATION OF THE ROUND POND (Pages 11 - 16) This report seeks the approval of the Committee, on behalf of the Lower Mole Project/Future Woodlands, for a phased approach to the restoration of the Round Pond.
    [Show full text]