DOCSLIB.ORG

Term Review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 in Relation to Target 3A – Agriculture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Term Review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 in Relation to Target 3A – Agriculture Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid- term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture Final Report 19th June 2017 Funded by European Commission, DG Environment In collaboration with 2 Disclaimer: The arguments expressed in this report are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinion of any other party. The report as a whole should be cited as follows: Siriwardena, G. and Tucker, G. (eds) (2017) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. The following individual chapters should be cited as follows: Chapter 2: Siriwardena, G and Pringle, H (2017) Development of a methodology for the assessment of potential agriculture-related drivers on the status of habitats and species. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 25-48. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 3: Pringle, H, Koeble, R, Paracchini M L, Rega, C, Henderson, I, Noble, D, Gamero, A, Vorisek, P, Škorpilová, J, Schmucki, R, Siriwardena, G, Allen, B, and Tucker, G (2017) Review of data sources and preparation of a metadatabase. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 49-60. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 4: Pringle, H, Siriwardena, G, Noble, D, Paracchini, M L, Koeble, R, Vorisek, P, Gamero, A, and Tucker, G, (2017) Integrated analysis of potential agricultural drivers of bird and butterfly population trends in the EU. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 61.87. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 5: Siriwardena, G and Pringle, H, Tucker, G, Koeble, R, Paracchini, M L, and Rega, C (2017) Case study 1: Factors affecting the condition of agriculture-associated species and habitats within Natura 2000 sites. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 88-101. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 6: Gamero, A, Skorpilova, J, Vorisek, P, Siriwardena, G and Tucker, G (2017) Case study 2: Effects of Natura 2000 site designation and management plans on farmland bird abundance trends. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 102-111. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 7: Siriwardena, G, Pringle, H, Koeble, R and Paracchini, M L (2017) Case study 3: large-scale and long-term bird distributions in Britain and Ireland in relation to lowland agricultural land-use. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 112-126. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 8: Pringle, H and Siriwardena, G (2017) Case study 4: UK agri-environment schemes and non-avian biodiversity. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to 3 target 3A – Agriculture, pp 127-146. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 9: Klenke, R, Frey, B, and Zarzycka, A (2017) Case study 5: The effects of increased rape and maize cropping on agricultural biodiversity. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 147-183. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Chapter 10: Gamero, A and Šálek, M (2017) Case study 6: Effects of habitat heterogeneity on biodiversity in intensive arable farms. In G Siriwardena & G Tucker (eds) Service contract to support follow-up actions to the mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 in relation to target 3A – Agriculture, pp 184-197. Report to the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Acknowledgements We thank Rayka Hauser of DG Environment and the members of the Steering Committee from the European Commission, EEA and JRC for their helpful guidance throughout this study. We are also grateful to Maria Luisa Paracchini and Renate Koeble of the JRC for their considerable help with identification, collation and processing of data for this study. Much of the biodiversity data used this study is based on species atlases, surveys and monitoring studies that have been mostly carried out by volunteer naturalists across Europe in collaboration with conservation and scientific originations (e.g. Pan European Common Bird Monitoring Survey coordinators). We are therefore indebted to all of them for their dedication and work. The specific datasets used in the integrated assessment and each case study are referred to in their respective chapters. Institute for European Environmental Policy London Office 11 Belgrave Road IEEP Offices, Floor 3 London, SW1V 1RB Tel: +44 (0) 20 7799 2244 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7799 2600 Brussels Office Quai au Foin, 55 Hooikaai 55 B- 1000 Brussels Tel: +32 (0) 2738 7482 Fax: +32 (0) 2732 4004 The Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) is an independent not-for- profit institute. IEEP undertakes work for external sponsors in a range of policy areas as well as engaging in our own research programmes. For further information about IEEP, see our website at www.ieep.eu or contact any staff member. 4 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................9 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 20 1.1 The context of this study ................................................................................................. 20 1.2 The aims, objectives and scope of this study .................................................................. 22 1.3 The structure of this report ............................................................................................. 23 2 Development of a methodology for the assessment of potential agriculture- related drivers on the status of habitats and species ....................................................... 25 2.1 Overview of this chapter .................................................................................................. 25 2.2 Forms of data ................................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Defining analytical questions ........................................................................................... 27 2.4 Analytical concept ............................................................................................................ 28 2.5 Decision tree .................................................................................................................... 33 3 Review of data sources and preparation of a metadatabase..................................... 49 3.1 Introduction and approach .............................................................................................. 49 3.2 Database structure........................................................................................................... 50 4 Integrated analysis of potential agricultural drivers of bird and butterfly population trends in the EU ............................................................................................ 61 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 61 4.2 Methodology and data sources ....................................................................................... 64 4.3 Results .............................................................................................................................. 73 4.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 81 4.5 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 87 5 Case study 1: Factors affecting the condition of agriculture-associated species and habitats within Natura 2000 sites ............................................................................. 88 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study of the Characteristics of the Appearances of Lepidoptera Larvae and Foodplants at Mt
    JOURNAL OF Research Paper ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT http://www.jecoenv.org J. Ecol. Environ. 36(4): 245-254, 2013 A Study of the Characteristics of the Appearances of Lepidoptera Larvae and Foodplants at Mt. Gyeryong National Park in Korea Yong-Gu Han, Sang-Ho Nam, Youngjin Kim, Min-Joo Choi and Youngho Cho* Department of Biology, College of Natural Science, Daejeon University, Daejeon 300-716, Korea Abstract This research was conducted over a time span of three years, from 2009 to 2011. Twenty-one surveys in total, seven times per year, were done between April and June of each year on major trees on trails around Donghaksa and Gapsa in Mt. Gyeryong National Park in order to identify foodplants of the Lepidoptera larvae and their characteristic appearances. During the survey of Lepidoptera larvae in trees along trails around Donghaksa and Gapsa, 377 individuals and 21 spe- cies in 8 families were identified. The 21 species wereAlcis angulifera, Cosmia affinis, Libythea celtis, Adoxophyes orana, Amphipyra monolitha, Acrodontis fumosa, Xylena formosa, Ptycholoma lecheana circumclusana, Choristoneura adum- bratana, Archips capsigeranus, Pandemis cinnamomeana, Rhopobota latipennis, Apochima juglansiaria, Cifuna locuples, Lymantria dispar, Eilema deplana, Rhodinia fugax, Acronicta rumicis, Amphipyra erebina, Favonius saphirinus, and Dra- vira ulupi. Twenty-one Lepidoptera insect species were identified in 21 species of trees, including Zelkova serrata. Among them, A. angulifera, C. affinis, and L. celtis were found to have the widest range of foodplants. Additionally, it was found that many species of Lepidoptera insects can utilize more species as foodplants according to the chemical substances in the plants and environments in addition to the foodplants noted in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Révision Taxinomique Et Nomenclaturale Des Rhopalocera Et Des Zygaenidae De France Métropolitaine
    Direction de la Recherche, de l’Expertise et de la Valorisation Direction Déléguée au Développement Durable, à la Conservation de la Nature et à l’Expertise Service du Patrimoine Naturel Dupont P, Luquet G. Chr., Demerges D., Drouet E. Révision taxinomique et nomenclaturale des Rhopalocera et des Zygaenidae de France métropolitaine. Conséquences sur l’acquisition et la gestion des données d’inventaire. Rapport SPN 2013 - 19 (Septembre 2013) Dupont (Pascal), Demerges (David), Drouet (Eric) et Luquet (Gérard Chr.). 2013. Révision systématique, taxinomique et nomenclaturale des Rhopalocera et des Zygaenidae de France métropolitaine. Conséquences sur l’acquisition et la gestion des données d’inventaire. Rapport MMNHN-SPN 2013 - 19, 201 p. Résumé : Les études de phylogénie moléculaire sur les Lépidoptères Rhopalocères et Zygènes sont de plus en plus nombreuses ces dernières années modifiant la systématique et la taxinomie de ces deux groupes. Une mise à jour complète est réalisée dans ce travail. Un cadre décisionnel a été élaboré pour les niveaux spécifiques et infra-spécifique avec une approche intégrative de la taxinomie. Ce cadre intégre notamment un aspect biogéographique en tenant compte des zones-refuges potentielles pour les espèces au cours du dernier maximum glaciaire. Cette démarche permet d’avoir une approche homogène pour le classement des taxa aux niveaux spécifiques et infra-spécifiques. Les conséquences pour l’acquisition des données dans le cadre d’un inventaire national sont développées. Summary : Studies on molecular phylogenies of Butterflies and Burnets have been increasingly frequent in the recent years, changing the systematics and taxonomy of these two groups. A full update has been performed in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? – a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Martin Wiemers* and Konrad Fiedler Address: Department of Population Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Email: Martin Wiemers* - [email protected]; Konrad Fiedler - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 7 March 2007 Received: 1 December 2006 Accepted: 7 March 2007 Frontiers in Zoology 2007, 4:8 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-8 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/8 © 2007 Wiemers and Fiedler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: DNA barcoding, i.e. the use of a 648 bp section of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I, has recently been promoted as useful for the rapid identification and discovery of species. Its success is dependent either on the strength of the claim that interspecific variation exceeds intraspecific variation by one order of magnitude, thus establishing a "barcoding gap", or on the reciprocal monophyly of species. Results: We present an analysis of intra- and interspecific variation in the butterfly family Lycaenidae which includes a well-sampled clade (genus Agrodiaetus) with a peculiar characteristic: most of its members are karyologically differentiated from each other which facilitates the recognition of species as reproductively isolated units even in allopatric populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Bugs: Warehouse Beetle
    Insects Limited, Inc. Pat Kelley, BCE Bad Bugs: Warehouse Beetle complaining customer. That is the nature of the Warehouse beetle. Let’s take a close look at this common stored product insect: The Warehouse beetle prefers feeding on animal protein. This could be anything from road kill to dog food to powdered cheese and milk. The beetle will feed on plant material but a dead insect or mouse would be its preferred food source. You will often find Warehouse beetles (Trogoderma spp.) feeding on dead insects. It is important to empty these lights on a regular basis. The larva (see figure) of the Warehouse beetle is approximately 1/4-inch-long Larval color varies from yellowish/white to dark brown as the larvae mature. Warehouse beetle larvae have two different tones of hairs on the posterior end. These guard hairs protect them against attack from the rear. The Warehouse beetle has about 1,706 hastisetae hairs If there is an insect that is truly a voracious feeder and about 2,196 spicisetae hairs according to a and a potential health hazard to humans and publication by George Okumura. Since a larva sheds young animals, the Warehouse beetle falls into that its hairs during each molt, the damage of this pest category because of the long list of foods that it insect comes from the 1000’s of these pointed hairs attacks. Next to the dreaded quarantine pest, that escape and enter a finished food product as an the Khapra beetle, it is the most serious stored insect fragment. These insect fragments then can be product insect pest with respect to health.
    [Show full text]
  • Schaus' Swallowtail
    Bring this image to life: Schaus’ Swallowtail see reverse side for details Heraclides aristodemus ponceanus Florida Museum 3D Butterfly Cards Inspiring people to care about life on earth The critically endangered Schaus’ Swallowtail (Heraclides aristodemus ponceanus) is a large, iconic butterfly found in South Florida. Historically, the butterfly inhabited dense upland forests called tropical hardwood hammocks from the greater Miami area south through the Florida Keys. Habitat loss and fragmentation over the past century have led to severe population declines and range reductions. Today, Schaus’ Swallowtail is restricted to only a few remaining sites in the northern Florida Keys, making it one of the rarest butterflies in the U.S. and our only federally listed swallowtail. Although small numbers occur on Key Largo, the main population resides on islands in Biscayne National Park. Because recent surveys indicate extremely small numbers of butterflies throughout its range, the risk of extinction is thought to be very high. Collaborative conservation and recovery efforts are underway for the Schaus’ Swallowtail. They include regular population monitoring, captive breeding, organism reintroduction and habitat restoration. • Download the Libraries of Life app from the iTunes or Android store and install on your device. • Launch the app and select the Florida Museum icon. • Hold your mobile device camera about 6 inches away from card image. • View specimen and click buttons to view content. Cover photo by: Jaret Daniels The Florida Museum of Natural History is a leading authority in biodiversity and cultural heritage, using its expertise to advance knowledge and solve real world problems. The Florida Museum inspires people to value the biological richness and cultural heritage of our diverse world and make a positive difference in its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Anatomy [Online]
    02 July 2015 (original version 01 January 2014) © Peter Eeles Citation: Eeles, P. (2015). Butterfly Anatomy [Online]. Available from http://www.dispar.org/reference.php?id=6 [Accessed July 2, 2015]. Butterfly Anatomy Peter Eeles This paper contains a condensed summary on the anatomy of the imago (adult), ovum (egg), larva (caterpillar) and pupa (chrysalis). Many of the features discussed on this page are referred to from the taxonomy section of the UK Butterflies website since they are used in butterfly classification. Imago The body of the adult butterfly is comprised of 3 segments - head, thorax and abdomen. The eyes, antennae, proboscis and palpi are all positioned on the head. The legs and wings are attached to the thorax. The reproductive organs and spiracles are part of the abdomen. All of these features are discussed in detail below and the illustrations below provide an overview of the majority of these features. Chequered Skipper (Carterocephalus palaemon) Photo © Pete Eeles Eyes The head contains a pair of compound eyes, each made up of a large number of photoreceptor units known as ommatidia. Each ommatidium includes a lens (the front of which makes up a single facet at the surface of the eye), light-sensitive visual cells and also cells that separate the ommatidium from its neighbours. The image below shows a closeup of the head of a Pyralid moth, clearly showing the facets on the surface of the eye. A butterfly is able to build up a complete picture of its surroundings by synthesising an image from the individual inputs provided by each ommatidium.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Butterflies of Savur District (Mardin Province, Southeastern Turkey)
    Sakarya University Journal of Science, 22 (6), 1907-1916, 2018. SAKARYA UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE e-ISSN: 2147-835X http://www.saujs.sakarya.edu.tr Received 09-02-2018 Doi Accepted 10.16984/saufenbilder.392685 24-10-2018 On the Butterflies of Savur District (Mardin Province, Southeastern Turkey) Erdem Seven*1 Cihan Yıldız2 Abstract In this study, butterfly species collected from Savur district of Mardin Province in 2016 and 2017, are presented. A total of 35 species are given in the Papilionidae (2), Pieridae (11), Satyridae (8), Argynnidae (4), Lycaenidae (5) and Hesperiidae (5) families from the research area that has not been studied previously on the butterflies. Original reference, synonyms, examined materials and distributions of each species are added. However, 6 species: Euchloe ausonia (Hübner, [1804]), Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pieridae), Melitaea phoebe (Goeze, 1779) (Argynnidae), Plebejus zephyrinus (Christoph, 1884) (Lycaenidae), Carcharodus lavatherae (Esper, [1783]) and Eogenes alcides Herrich-Schäffer, [1852] (Hesperiidae) are the first record for Mardin Province. Keywords: Fauna, Butterfly, Savur, Mardin Kemal and Koçak [3] were presented first 1. INTRODUCTION exhaustive study on the synonymic list of 81 butterfies species in 2006 and afterwards, Kemal et al., [4] were listed totally 274 Lepidopteran In Turkey, 5577 Lepidoptera species are known species from Mardin Province. Furthermore, the and, among them 412 species belong to the last current list of 83 butterfly species were given Rhopalocera (Butterfly) group [1]. When by Koçak and Kemal [5] again, in their paper on compared to other nearby areas in Turkey, it is Mardin's Lepidoptera species. Also, Kocak and seen that studies on the Lepidoptera fauna of Kemal was published a revised synonymous and Mardin Province is not adequate and distributional list of butterfly and moth species comprehensive researches have not been showing distribution in Turkey in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Portugal: Birds, Alpine Flora & Prehistoric
    Wild Portugal: Birds, Alpine Flora & Prehistoric Art Naturetrek Tour Report 22 – 29 July 2015 View from the Serra Da Estrela View from Castelo Rodrigo Report compiled by Philip Thompson Images by Tom Mabbett Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Wild Portugal: Birds, Alpine Flora & Prehistoric Art Tour Report Tour Participants: Philip Thompson and Laura Benito (leaders) with 10 Naturetrek clients Day 1 Wednesday 22nd July The group arrived on time into Porto Airport, and soon our vehicles were loaded and we were on the road, heading for our first hotel in Castelo Rodrigo. Few birds were seen in the early stages of the journey as we sped along the good motorways. Once we had turned off onto minor roads for the final leg of the journey we began to see a few raptors and shrikes. We stopped at a suitable pull in for a light lunch and to acclimatise to the hot dry conditions. Moving on, we were soon climbing towards the hilltop town of Castelo Rodrigo with its ruined castle on the summit. Our hotel was located within the old town just below the castle, where we were soon allocated rooms for our stay. Day 2 Thursday 23rd July Today we headed north to explore the Douro valley. En route we stopped at a roadside viewpoint which was opposite some cliffs where a small colony of Griffon Vultures breed. A couple of birds were seen below us settled on the grassy slopes, and there were a few ‘flyby’ individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Wallacea Science Report 2019, Târnava Mare, Transylvania
    Operation Wallacea Science Report 2019, Târnava Mare, Transylvania Angofa, near Sighișoara. JJB. This report has been compiled by Dr Joseph J. Bailey (Senior Scientist for Operation Wallacea and Lecturer in Biogeography at York St John University, UK) on behalf of all contributing scientists and the support team. The project is the result of the close collaboration between Operation Wallacea and Fundația ADEPT, with thanks also to York St John University. Published 31st March 2020 (version 1). CONTENTS 1 THE 2019 TEAM ............................................ 1 4.14 Small mammals ................................. 15 2 ABBREVIATIONS & DEFINITIONS .......... 2 4.15 Large mammals: Camera trap ..... 15 3 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ......... 3 4.16 Large mammals: Signs .................... 15 3.1 The landscape....................................... 3 5 RESULTS ........................................................ 17 3.2 Aims and scope .................................... 3 5.1 Highlights ............................................. 17 3.3 Caveats .................................................... 4 5.2 Farmer interviews ............................ 18 3.4 Wider context for 2019 .................... 4 5.3 Grassland plants ................................ 22 3.5 What is Operation Wallacea? ......... 5 5.3.1 Species trends (village) ........ 22 3.6 Research projects and planning ... 5 5.3.2 Biodiversity trends (plots) .. 25 3.6.1 In progress ................................... 6 5.4 Grassland butterflies ....................... 27 3.6.2
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Different Mowing Regimes on Butterflies and Diurnal Moths on Road Verges A
    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 29.2 (2006) 133 Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges A. Valtonen, K. Saarinen & J. Jantunen Valtonen, A., Saarinen, K. & Jantunen, J., 2006. Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 29.2: 133–148. Abstract Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges.— In northern and central Europe road verges offer alternative habitats for declining plant and invertebrate species of semi– natural grasslands. The quality of road verges as habitats depends on several factors, of which the mowing regime is one of the easiest to modify. In this study we compared the Lepidoptera communities on road verges that underwent three different mowing regimes regarding the timing and intensity of mowing; mowing in mid–summer, mowing in late summer, and partial mowing (a narrow strip next to the road). A total of 12,174 individuals and 107 species of Lepidoptera were recorded. The mid–summer mown verges had lower species richness and abundance of butterflies and lower species richness and diversity of diurnal moths compared to the late summer and partially mown verges. By delaying the annual mowing until late summer or promoting mosaic–like mowing regimes, such as partial mowing, the quality of road verges as habitats for butterflies and diurnal moths can be improved. Key words: Mowing management, Road verge, Butterfly, Diurnal moth, Alternative habitat, Mowing intensity. Resumen Efecto de los distintos regímenes de siega de los márgenes de las carreteras sobre las polillas diurnas y las mariposas.— En Europa central y septentrional los márgenes de las carreteras constituyen hábitats alternativos para especies de invertebrados y plantas de los prados semi–naturales cuyas poblaciones se están reduciendo.
    [Show full text]
  • Com Diferenciar Les Espècies De Carcharodus
    Identificació 19 Com diferenciar les espècies de Carcharodus Cynthia Entre els hespèrids destaquen els del gènere Carcharodus, molt homogeni i fàcil de separar d’altres gèneres propers. C. alceae, que és l’espècie més comuna, es troba estesa per tot Catalunya i és l’única que viu també a les illes Balears. Aquesta espècie, però, pot conviure amb altres tres, molt més rares i localitzades, que són C. flocciferus, C. boeticus i C. lavatherae. alceae és la més generalista i, a Catalunya, es pot ta, Althaea officinalis, Abutilon teophrasti i Lavatera sp.1. Les considerar ubiqüista (fins ara ha aparegut en el altres tres fan servir labiades. C. flocciferus sembla preferir 77% de les estacions del CBMS). Prefereix els Stachys officinalis2, encara que al Montseny possiblement hàbitats degradats (zones ruderals i fins i tot urba- també utilitza S. recta i Ballota nigra1; C. boeticus es desen- C. 1 1 nes, com Barcelona ciutat ), on proliferen les malves. C. floc- volupa sobre Marrubium vulgare i Ballota nigra . C. lava- ciferus (8% dels itineraris) viu en zones de muntanya, més therae sobre Stachys recta, Sideritis hirsuta i S. scordioides3, freqüentment al nord del país. C. boeticus (12% dels itine- però no existeixen observacions directes a Catalunya. Les raris) i C. lavatherae (21% dels itineraris) ocupen hàbitats larves construeixen refugis lligant una o més fulles amb seda. molt més secs. La primera és més freqüent a la Catalunya Aquests abrics són utilitzats també per les larves hibernants central i meridional, però també assoleix el litoral al nord i per pupar. C. alceae i C.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effect of Browsing on Brown Hairstreak
    107528 Piotr Szota (BSc Ecology & Conservation) Candidate number: 107528 Supervisor: Dr. Alan Stewart Investigating the effect of browsing and differing hedgerow parameters on Brown hairstreak Thecla betulae egg numbers across East and West Sussex 22nd January 2015 1 107528 Abstract British Lepidoptera, especially those with more specialized habitat requirements show evidence of decline greater than other taxonomic groups, with agricultural intensification and mechanisation being the main identified cause behind the Brown hairstreak’s decline. An adult survey was conducted in July/August 2014, yielding 5 observations of imagines at a well-known population hotspot, Knepp Castle Estate. Due to their elusiveness, focus was shifted to more representative egg searches carried out in winter 200m of >50% blackthorn hedgerow on several sites in East and West Sussex was systematically searched in 10m sections, yielding 31 ova. Different hedge parameters which were hypothesized to influence egg distribution were recorded, with studies by Merckx & Berwaerts (2010) and Fartmann & Timmermann (2006) as rough guides Statistical analyses found no links between varying hedge parameters and the number of eggs recorded, although due to the small size of the dataset which may not be representative of the whole region this cannot be deemed conclusive. Introduction 2 107528 It is a sad paradox that insects, the most diverse and species rich group of living organisms (Gaston, 1993) which comprises the vast bulk of terrestrial biodiversity and provides humans with vital ecosystem services, is largely overlooked if not outright scorned by the general population (Pyle et al, 1981). Vast amounts of professional entomology research focus on pest species of agricultural crops (ibid).
    [Show full text]