DOCSLIB.ORG

View Arran Ferry Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Arran Ferry Report Arran & Campbeltown Mainland Ferry Terminal – Appraisal of Options Final Report – Redacted Version Operator and Financial Material Commercially Confidential On behalf of Transport Scotland Project Ref: 39975 | Rev: SC | Date: March 2017 Office Address: 3rd Floor, Exchange Place 3, 3 Semple Street, Edinburgh EH3 8BL T: +44 (0)131 297 7010 E: [email protected] Final Report Arran & Campbeltown Mainland Ferry Terminal – Appraisal of Options Document Control Sheet Project Name: Arran & Campbeltown Mainland Ferry Terminal – Appraisal of Options Project Ref: 39975 Report Title: Final Report – Redacted Version Date: 16 March 2017 Name Position Signature Date Stephen Associate – Prepared by: 31/01/2017 Canning Transport Planner Director, Transport Reviewed by: Scott Leitham 09/03/2017 Planning Director, Transport Approved by: Paul McCartney 09/03/2017 Economics For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Updated of the Interim Report Interim - 09/02/17 based on TS comments to SC SL PMcC V2.0 produce final report Update of Version 2.0 to take Interim - account of further TS comments, 16/02/17 SC SL PMcC V3.0 haulier consultation & TS Rail Team comments Final report including cost model Final V1.0 28/02/17 SC SL PMcC and simulations. Final report including cost model Final V2.0 09/03/17 SC SL PMcC and simulations. Final report including edited Final V2.1 10/03/17 SC SL PMcC proposal sections. Final V2.2 16/03/17 Final report SC SL PMcC This report has been prepared by Peter Brett Associates LLP (‘PBA’) on behalf of its client to whom this report is addressed (‘Client’) in connection with the project described in this report and takes into account the Client's particular instructions and requirements. This report was prepared in accordance with the professional services appointment under which PBA was appointed by its Client. This report is not intended for and should not be relied on by any third party (i.e. parties other than the Client). PBA accepts no duty or responsibility (including in negligence) to any party other than the Client and disclaims all liability of any nature whatsoever to any such party in respect of this report. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2017 ii Final Report Arran & Campbeltown Mainland Ferry Terminal – Appraisal of Options Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 7 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Study Remit ................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Current Carryings ........................................................................................................ 13 2 Ardrossan & Troon – Ferry Operations .................................................................................. 15 2.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Current & Future Vessels ............................................................................................ 15 2.3 Distances, Sailing Times and Fares ............................................................................ 16 2.4 Tides ............................................................................................................................ 23 2.5 Berthing ....................................................................................................................... 24 2.6 Limitations, Conditions & Sea State ............................................................................ 26 3 Summary of Proposals ............................................................................................................. 28 3.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 28 3.2 Ardrossan – Peel Ports ............................................................................................... 28 3.3 Troon – Associated British Ports ................................................................................. 32 4 Reliability ................................................................................................................................... 37 4.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Simulations .................................................................................................................. 37 4.3 Operator Data .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4 P&O Ferries Data ........................................................................................................ 42 4.5 Views of Master Mariners ............................................................................................ 44 4.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 50 5 Onward Transport Connectivity .............................................................................................. 51 5.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 51 5.2 Physical Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 51 5.3 Public Transport Connectivity ...................................................................................... 52 5.4 Road Connections ....................................................................................................... 57 5.5 Carryings Analysis ....................................................................................................... 58 5.6 Accessibility Analysis................................................................................................... 60 5.7 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 72 6 Socio-Economic Issues ............................................................................................................ 73 6.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 73 6.2 Census Travel-to-Work ............................................................................................... 73 6.3 Direct Employment Impacts ........................................................................................ 75 6.4 Local Authority Services .............................................................................................. 76 6.5 Evidence on Local Spend ............................................................................................ 76 6.6 Impact on the Haulage Industry .................................................................................. 77 iii Final Report Arran & Campbeltown Mainland Ferry Terminal – Appraisal of Options 6.7 Future of Ardrossan Harbour Branch Line .................................................................. 78 7 Assessment against STAG Criteria ......................................................................................... 80 7.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 80 7.2 Environment ................................................................................................................ 80 7.3 Safety .......................................................................................................................... 81 7.4 Economy ...................................................................................................................... 82 7.5 Integration .................................................................................................................... 85 7.6 Accessibility & Social Inclusion ................................................................................... 85 7.7 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................................... 86 7.8 Operational Feasibility ................................................................................................. 86 7.9 Public Acceptability...................................................................................................... 86 8 Cost to Government .................................................................................................................. 88 8.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 88 8.2 Cost Model .................................................................................................................. 88 8.3 Summary of Results .................................................................................................... 91 9 Risk & Uncertainty .................................................................................................................... 93 9.1 Overview .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Questions Re: Ardrossan Upgrade 1. Why Has There
    Questions re: Ardrossan upgrade 1. Why has there been no community engagement carried out as promised? The work of the steering group undertaken since the public engagement events in October 2018 have focused on the design of the marine works which included technical elements; whereby during this period direct engagement with the Arran community has been undertaken through the Arran Ferry Committee representative. The feedback from the initial public engagement events has informed the progress made to date. Ensuring the views of the community are heard and understood is an important part of the project and there are various stages of the project at which we will engage with the community. The Ardrossan project is currently in the planning and design phase with the Steering Group members developing the marine and landside infrastructure design. Public information events are currently being arranged for January 2020 in Ardrossan and Brodick. These will provide an update on the landside infrastructure planning and design phase. North Ayrshire Council and Peel Ports Group have recently appointed a Lead Consultant Team which includes a Master planner and Architect for the landside design works. More details will follow on specific dates and times of the events. CalMac and Transport Scotland will be meeting with the AFC in the New Year to discuss service continuity and more engagement with the Ardrossan and Brodick communities will follow. 2. How much will this cost and who is paying what? The project at its current stage of development is estimated to cost between £35-£40million. The final cost of the project will not be known until the tender and procurement process has been undertaken and a contractor appointed.
    [Show full text]
  • Clyde River Steamer Club Founded 1932
    Clyde River Steamer Club Founded 1932 Nominated Excursion aboard MV Hebrides to Arran th Saturday 12 January 2013 For the New Year excursion in 2013, the Clyde River Steamer Club has again decided to organise a trip to the Isle of Arran. Caledonian MacBrayne have confirmed that during the annual overhaul period of MV CALEDONIAN ISLES , it is the intention that MV HEBRIDES will be deployed on the Ardrossan-Brodick service. This will be the first time MV HEBRIDES has served on the Arran run and her first spell of service on the Clyde. The attractive price of £25.00 per adult (£10.00 per child – under 18) includes: - Return ferry travel to and from Brodick on MV HEBRIDES. - A photographic opportunity in Brodick on the outward journey. - A private coach tour round the north of Arran passing through the villages of Corrie, Sannox, Lochranza, Catacol and Pirnmill to Blackwaterfoot. - A two course meal (menu below) with tea or coffee at the Kinloch Hotel, Blackwaterfoot. - Free time in Brodick prior to catching the return sailing to Ardrossan at 1640. Advance tickets are available at the above reduced rate by post from the Cruising Coordinator at the address below. As places are limited book early to avoid disappointment. Bookings received after Friday 4 January will be subject to a higher rate. Please note that lunch options must be selected from the options below at the time of booking. ********** Alternatively book ONLINE at www.crsc.org.uk ********** Itinerary: Ardrossan dep 0945 Brodick arrive 1040 Brodick dep (coach) 1115 via North Arran to Blackwaterfoot ******** Lunch at Kinloch Hotel between 1230 and 1430 ******** Blackwaterfoot dep (coach) 1430 via ‘The String’ road to Brodick Brodick dep 1640 Ardrossan arrive 1735 The final itinerary of the day may be subject to alteration, dependant on weather and other circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nice Place for Abitof a Giggle
    A nice place for a bit of a giggle FROM THE EDITOR here's a special place in In any event, I thoroughly enjoyed my heart for Scotland, so my 36 hours in Scotland. The weather you'll understand my envy was mild, the scenery gorgeous, the when freelance photo­ dialects lovely and the people were grapher Chuck Fox delightfully warm. announcedT he would be vacationing When I completed my interviews, a there in August and would be happy secretary volunteered to drive me to to shoot a MEASURE assignment. the Edinburgh airport for the flight to Ironically, the story (page 15) dealt Paris. Her manager had been traveling with Caledonian MacBrayne, a ferry for the past 10 days, and the airport service that uses HP equipment for a trip would give her the chance to variety of tasks. Scotland. Ferries. It make sure that his company car was was kismet. Let me explain. in good working order. On the cover: People Four years ago, my wife, Kate, I slid into the passenger seat, look­ throughout England have and I planned to attend her family ing dapper in my Corporate navy blue known Boddingtons for its distinctive yellow and black reunion in Ireland. It was a once-in-a­ suit. She reached down to release the umbrellas, coasters and lifetime gathering of about 90 Flynns emergency brake and, instead, tripped beer cans for years. Today, from Western Ireland, Manchester, the car's fire extinguisher. the Boddington Group pubs and leisure hotels, like the England, and descendants scattered A cloud ofwhite smoke engulfed one at The Moorings, are a throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Vessel Replacement and Deployment Plan
    Subject: Vessel Replacement and Deployment Plan Document: Annual Report 2015 Publication Date: December 2016 1 CONTENTS Section Page 1 CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 3 PROGRESS UPDATE SINCE THE 2014 ANNUAL REPORT .................................................................. 5 4 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 6 5 ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................................................................ 6 6 PRIORITIES ....................................................................................................................................... 7 7 APPROACH ...................................................................................................................................... 7 7.1 The Ferries Plan ....................................................................................................................... 7 7.2 Independent Forecasts ........................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Capacity/Demand Model ........................................................................................................ 8 7.4 Impact of Changing
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Re: Ardrossan Upgrade 1. Why Has There
    Questions re: Ardrossan upgrade 1. Why has there been no community engagement carried out as promised? Ensuring the views of the community are heard and understood is an important part of the project and there are various stages of the project at which we will engage with the community. The Ardrossan project is currently in the planning and design phase with the Steering Group members developing the marine and landside infrastructure design. The work of the steering group undertaken since the public engagement events in October 2018 has focused on the design of the marine and landside works which included technical elements; whereby during this period direct engagement with the Arran community has been undertaken through the Arran Ferry Committee representative. The feedback from the initial public engagement events has informed the progress made to date. Due to Coronavirus the Public information events that were expected to take place earlier this year were postponed and will be re-scheduled. The Transport Scotland and North Ayrshire websites will continue to be updated. North Ayrshire Council are currently developing a Landside Infrastructure public consultation and details of this will be published shortly. CalMac and Transport Scotland met with members of the AFC, Stagecoach, SPT and other members of the community in January and February to discuss service continuity and service requirements during the construction works. Further engagement with the Ardrossan and Brodick communities will follow during 2020 subject to further restrictions and guidance relating to COVID-19. 2. How much will this cost and who is paying what? The project at its current stage of development is estimated to cost between £35-£40million.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Economy & Connectivity Committee
    Rural Economy & Connectivity Committee Inquiry into construction and procurement of ferry vessels in Scotland Evidence submission from Mull & Iona Ferry Committee. This paper focusses on questions surrounding the design of 801/802 and prevailing ferry norms in the CalMac fleet. 12/01/20 Page 1 of 16 BACKGROUND Hulls 801 and 802 are not planned to serve routes to Mull or Iona, but their introduction was intended to have a profound positive effect on our main service between Oban and Craignure. Hull 802 was originally due to be deployed in 2018 to Uig, which would release the MV Hebrides to move to Mull. Oban – Craignure is currently served by two vessels in summer – the MV Isle of Mull (31 years old, 70 car capacity), and the MV Coruisk (16 years old, 40 car capacity). Prior to the introduction of RET in 2015, the MV Isle of Mull operated the service on her own. Since RET however, summer vehicle carryings have increased by 31% and the Coruisk was added to the summer service to add capacity. Even with two vessels there is still inadequate vehicle capacity, and a vessel larger than the Coruisk is urgently needed. DIRECT IMMEDIATE EFFECT ON MULL AND IONA. The Oban – Craignure Route is the most congested in the entire CalMac network, as shown by the table to the left. The route most in need of additional capacity is therefore Oban-Craignure, and of all the islands, it is Mull and Iona that will be damaged most as a result of the late delivery of hulls 801 and 802.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrides Ferry Stakeholder Group
    HEBRIDES FERRY STAKEHOLDER GROUP (Barra, the Uists, Lewis and Harris) Minute of Meeting held at the Dark Island Hotel, Balivanich, on 6 June 2019 at 11.00am IN ATTENDANCE COMHAIRLE NAN EILAN SIAR Cllr Uisdean Robertson (Chairman) Cllr Kenny Macleod (Vice-Chairman) Cllr Iain A MacNeil Cllr Iain M Macleod Cllr John Mackay Cllr Donald Manford (Skype) Mr Iain Buchanan Mr Derek Mackay (teleconference) Mrs Yvonne Maciver (teleconference) TRANSPORT SCOTLAND Mr Brian Gordon Mr Alan McCabe CALEDONIAN MACBRAYNE LTD (CALMAC) Mr David Gibson Mr Robert Morrison Ms Demi Wylie Mr Robbie Drummond Mr Finlay Macrae Mr Andrew McNair CALMAC COMMUNITY BOARD Mr Angus Campbell CALEDONIAN MARITIME ASSETS LTD. (CMAL) Mr Kevin Hobbs HITRANS Mr Neil MacRae HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS ENTERPRISE (HIE) Joanna Peteranna OUTER HEBRIDES COMMERCE GROUP Ms Gail Robertson OUTER HEBRIDES TOURISM Mr Alan Graham AECOM Mr Neil Halket FSB David Richardson (Skype) APOLOGIES DR Macleod (FSB) Mr Kevin Peach (Ullapool Harbour Trust) Mr David Summers (The Highland Council) Mr Ker Corbett (CPT) Mr Rob Mackinnon (Outer Hebrides Tourism) Mr Iain Mackinnon (CnES) Cllr Iain Cockburn (The Highland Council) Cllr Paul Finnegan (CnES) 1 Minute of Meeting held on The Minute of Meeting of 13 December 2018 was approved. 13 December 2019 2 Matters Arising Under item 5 (Regional VRDP Update) from the minute of 13 December 2018. The Chairman put forward the questions. Question 1-3 for Calmac and question 4 to Transport Scotland: (1) There was clearly some presumption that MV Isle of Arran will be removed
    [Show full text]
  • Ferries and Marine Infrastructure Capability Statement OUR SERVICES CLIENT TESTIMONIAL
    Ferries and Marine Infrastructure Capability Statement OUR SERVICES CLIENT TESTIMONIAL Our business is focused on supporting the public sector, commercial ferry operators and port authorities in the planning, operation and delivery of ferry services and associated infrastructure – key skills include: ‣ appraisal and business case development; ‣ demand and revenue forecasting; ‣ data analytics, including coding and dashboard production; ‣ operator cost analysis; ‣ customer and stakeholder engagement; ‣ ferries policy development; and Stantec is an excellent consultant working ‣ research, particularly in support of demonstrating value for money from public sector investment. to high levels of competence and also to high levels of integrity. They are adaptable to circumstances and will change plans In order to complement our offering, we work with a small team of “and tasks if circumstances require it, often trusted suppliers with which we have developed long-term relationships. without impacts on project costs overall. Supplementary skills available within our supply-chain include: ‣ marine civil engineering, including infrastructure design, consenting, Stantec is committed to achieving the procurement and site supervision; client’s aims even when that requires ‣ ferry operations; constructive challenging of views. If there is one outstanding feature of ‣ harbour operations and management; Stantec, it is their capacity to reach a deep ‣ brokerage and vessel procurement advice; and understanding of the context in which they ‣ marine freight and logistics. are working and therefore their research, analysis and conclusions can be relied upon to fit well with requirements.” Michael Craigie Executive Manager – Transport Planning Shetland Islands Council Our team and a small selection of our relevant experience is presented in this capability statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Ferries for Mull?
    November 2020 Mull & Iona Ferry Committee Catamarans - Future Ferries for Mull? The MV Isle of Mull is now more than 32 years old, and is one of the oldest ferries in the CalMac fleet. There are no plans in the immediate future to replace her, and we are all becoming more aware of the shortcomings of the service provided by this outdated vessel. We want to get users involved in the search for a new ferry that could update and transform our service by addressing the key problems: We can’t travel when we want to in the summer. As island residents, we all know how difficult it can be in the summer to get a car booking on the sailing of our choice. What you might not have been aware of is that our main service is the most congested in the entire CalMac network. Simply put, there are not enough car spaces, relative to the number of cars that want to travel. Our ferries are too expensive to run. “So what?” you might think, fares are protected by the Road Equivalent Tariff, and the government pays CalMac a subsidy to make up the difference. Well, first of all the annual subsidy that CalMac receive is now running at £140 million per year (that’s just for running costs, it doesn’t include the cost of building new piers and ferries). To put that into perspective, that’s more than the combined education budgets of both Argyll and Bute and Western Isles councils – so we are spending more on subsidising the ferry operator than we are on educating our kids.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Re: Ardrossan Upgrade 1. Why Has There
    Questions re: Ardrossan upgrade 1. Why has there been no community engagement carried out as promised? Ensuring the views of the community are heard and understood is an important part of the project and there are various stages of the project at which we will engage with the community. The Ardrossan project is currently in the planning and design phase with the Steering Group members developing the marine and landside infrastructure design. The work of the steering group undertaken since the public engagement events in October 2018 has focused on the design of the marine and landside works which included technical elements; whereby during this period direct engagement with the Arran community has been undertaken through the Arran Ferry Committee representative. The feedback from the initial public engagement events has informed the progress made to date. Due to Coronavirus the Public information events that were expected to take place earlier this year were postponed and will be re-scheduled. The Transport Scotland and North Ayrshire websites will continue to be updated. North Ayrshire Council are currently developing a Landside Infrastructure public consultation and details of this will be published shortly. CalMac and Transport Scotland met with members of the AFC, Stagecoach, SPT and other members of the community in January and February to discuss service continuity and service requirements during the construction works. Further engagement with the Ardrossan and Brodick communities will follow during 2020 subject to further restrictions and guidance relating to COVID-19. 2. How much will this cost and who is paying what? The project at its current stage of development is estimated to cost between £35-£40million.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Engagement Unit Subject: FW: Woken up to Another Three Cancellations This Morning All Due to Calmac - How Much More Can We All Take?
    From: Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure and Connectivity Sent: 22 September 2018 11:02:25 To: Public Engagement Unit Subject: FW: Woken up to another three cancellations this morning all due to Calmac - how much more can we all take? For MACCS- fast track please Private Office to Michael Matheson MSP Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure and Connectivity Tel: ________________________________ From: "Matheson M (Michael), MSP" <[email protected]> Sent: 22 Sep 2018 10:41 To: "Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure and Connectivity" <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Woken up to another three cancellations this morning all due to Calmac - how much more can we all take? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Russell MW (Michael), MSP" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected] t>> Date: 22 September 2018 at 10:23:45 BST To: "Wheelhouse P (Paul), MSP" <[email protected]<mailto:Paul.Wheelhouse.msp@parliament. scot>>, "Matheson M (Michael), MSP" <[email protected]<mailto:Michael.Matheson.msp@parliame nt.scot>> Subject: FW: Woken up to another three cancellations this morning all due to Calmac - how much more can we all take? From: > Powered by [mage removed by sender. freetobook] ********************************************************************* * The Scottish Parliament: Making a positive difference to the lives of the people of Scotland Pàrlamaid na h-Alba: A’ toirt deagh bhuaidh air beatha sluagh na h-Alba www.parliament.scot<http://www.parliament.scot> : facebook.com/scottishparliament<http://facebook.com/scottishparliament> : twitter.com/scotparl<http://twitter.com/ScotParl> The information in this email may be confidential.
    [Show full text]
  • Minute of Argyll Ferry Users Group (FUG) (Oban, Colonsay, Iona, Lismore, Coll, Tiree, Barra, South Uist, Islay, Kintyre, Jura, Gigha)
    Minute of Argyll Ferry Users Group (FUG) (Oban, Colonsay, Iona, Lismore, Coll, Tiree, Barra, South Uist, Islay, Kintyre, Jura, Gigha) Held at The Glen Hotel, Soroba, Oban 10:00 on Tuesday 17 November 2015 IN ATTENDANCE HITRANS Neil MacRae Julie Cromarty ARGYLL & BUTE COUNCIL Cllr Alistair MacDougall Cllr Iain Angus MacDonald Stewart Clark COMHAIRLE NAN EILEAN SIAR Cllr Donald Manford Cllr Ronnie MacKinnon ARGYLL & ISLES TOURISM CO-OP Neil Goldsmith FEDERATION OF SMALL BUSINESS Allan Parker ISLAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL Jim Porteous William MacFarlane ROAD ASSOCIATION HAULAGE Catriona Maclennan Stewart Maclennan SCOTTISH CITYLINK Jim Jackson CALEDONIAN MACBRAYNE Eric Smith Robert Morrison David Cannon TRANSPORT SCOTLAND (FERRIES DIVISION) Paul Linhart-MacAskill Presentation Transport Scotland Procurement Callum Grigor Robert Spratt Bid Team Cynthia Spencer – CalMac Robbie Drummond – CalMac Finlay Macrae – CalMac APOLOGIES Cllr Robin Currie – Argyll & Bute Council Moya Ingram – Argyll & Bute Council Robert G MacIntyre – Argyll & Bute Council Sue Gledhill – HIE Iain Mackinnon – CnES David Adams McGilp – Visit Scotland Des Bradley – ScotRail Welcome & Introductions ITEM 1 1000 - 1100 Operational FUG Meeting a) Vessel Replacement and Deployment Plan Paul Linhart-MacAskill of TS provided a summary of the VRDP which was enclosed within the papers. Jim Porteous sought clarification on vessel to be deployed on Kennacraig route beyond 2019. PLM confirmed this information would be finalised in the 2015 update of the report. Neil Goldsmith raised concerns over number of cancellations and ability for MV Isle of Mull to cope over the winter period. Cllr Donald Manford commended TS for the forward planning approach of the VDRP and Scottish Ferries Plan. He also raised concern for the ability of the Oban terminal and facilities to cope with the additional services from Summer 2016.
    [Show full text]