(Laccaria Bicolor) As Model Organism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Laccaria Bicolor) As Model Organism 7UHKDORVHLQWKHELFRORXUHGGHFHLYHU /DFFDULDELFRORU 'LVVHUWDWLRQ ]XU(UODQJXQJGHV*UDGHVHLQHV 'RNWRUVGHU1DWXUZLVVHQVFKDIWHQ 'UUHUQDW LP)DFKEHUHLFK %LRORJLH&KHPLH YRUJHOHJWYRQ 6HEDVWLDQ:LWWXOVN\ %UHPHQ$SULO “Many of life's failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.” Thomas Alva Edison (1847 - 1931) Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Uwe Nehls 2. Prof. Dr. Barbara Reinhold-Hurek Tag des öffentlichen Kolloquiums: 24.05.2013 Table of contents Page 1 Table of contents Table of contents.............................................................................1 I Zusammenfassung.................................................................6 II Summary.................................................................................9 1 Introduction ............................................................................. 11 1.1 Bicoloured deceiver (Laccaria bicolor) as model organism ............................... 11 1.1.1 Lifecycle of Basidiomycota ................................................................................................ 13 1.1.1.1 The tetrapolar mating system of Laccaria ......................................................... 15 1.1.2 Laccaria bicolor - an ectomycorrhiza forming model fungus ............................................. 17 1.1.3 Carbohydrate acquisition in ectomycorrhizal fungi ............................................................ 18 1.2 Carbohydrates in fungi ...................................................................................... 19 1.2.1 Sugar phosphorylation....................................................................................................... 19 1.2.2 Glycogen and trehalose in fungi ........................................................................................ 20 1.2.2.1 Glycogen metabolism ........................................................................................ 21 1.2.2.2 Trehalose metabolism ....................................................................................... 22 1.2.2.2.1 Trehalose biosynthesis by the TPS-complex ............................................... 22 1.2.2.2.2 Trehalose metabolism by trehalose phosphorylase ..................................... 24 1.2.2.2.3 Degradation of trehalose by trehalases ........................................................ 24 1.2.3 Carbohydrates as fungal storage compounds .................................................................. 25 1.2.3.1 Trehalose as carbon store in ectomycorrhizal symbiosis ................................. 26 1.2.4 Function of trehalose in fungi in response to abiotic stress .............................................. 26 1.2.5 Regulation of fungal carbohydrate metabolism ................................................................. 27 1.3 RNA interference as a tool to manipulate gene expression in Laccaria ............ 29 1.4 Aim of the thesis ................................................................................................ 30 2 Materials and Methods ........................................................... 32 2.1 Bioinformatics .................................................................................................... 32 2.1.1 Programs and databases .................................................................................................. 32 2.1.2 Online sources ................................................................................................................... 32 2.1.3 Identification of genes involved in trehalose metabolism .................................................. 33 Table of contents Page 2 2.2 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................. 34 2.3 Organisms and plasmids ................................................................................... 34 2.3.1 Organisms ......................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.2 Plasmids .......................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.2.1 E. coli cloning vectors ....................................................................................... 34 2.3.2.2 The fungal transformation vector pBGgHg ....................................................... 35 2.4 Culture of organisms ......................................................................................... 36 2.4.1 Bacteria .......................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.2 Laccaria bicolor ................................................................................................................. 37 2.5 Molecular biological methods ............................................................................ 37 2.5.1 Isolation of nucleic acids.................................................................................................... 37 2.5.1.1 Isolation of total RNA ........................................................................................ 37 2.5.1.2 Isolation of genomic DNA .................................................................................. 38 2.5.2 Amplification of DNA fragments by PCR ........................................................................... 39 2.5.3 Gel-electrophoresis of nucleic acids .................................................................................. 39 2.5.3.1 RNA ................................................................................................................... 39 2.5.3.2 DNA ................................................................................................................... 40 2.5.3.3 Visualisation of DNA/RNA ................................................................................. 40 2.5.4 Cloning of DNA fragments ................................................................................................. 40 2.5.4.1 DNA digestion ................................................................................................... 40 2.5.4.2 Isolation of DNA fragments from agarose gels ................................................. 40 2.5.4.3 Ligation of DNA fragments into plasmids .......................................................... 41 2.5.4.4 Plasmid preparation from Escherichia coli ........................................................ 41 2.5.4.5 Sequencing of DNA ........................................................................................... 42 2.5.4.6 PCR amplification of genes of interest .............................................................. 42 2.5.4.7 PCR amplification of genomic DNA fragments and introduction of novel restriction enzyme digestion sites ............................................................................................... 43 2.5.5 Quantification of gene expression ..................................................................................... 44 2.5.5.1 Isolation of total RNA ........................................................................................ 44 2.5.5.2 cDNA synthesis ................................................................................................. 45 2.5.5.3 Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) ........................................................................... 45 2.5.5.3.1 Primer selection for qPCR ............................................................................ 45 2.5.5.3.2 Quantification of gene expression using 18S rRNA as external standard.... 46 2.5.6 Transformation of Escherichia coli .................................................................................... 47 2.5.6.1 Generation of transformation competent E. coli ................................................ 47 2.5.6.2 Transformation of competent E. coli ................................................................. 47 2.5.7 Transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens ................................................................. 48 Table of contents Page 3 2.5.7.1 Generation of transformation competent A. tumefaciens ................................. 48 2.5.7.2 Transformation of competent A. tumefaciens ................................................... 48 2.5.8 Transformation of Laccaria bicolor .................................................................................... 48 2.5.9 Fungal growth assays ........................................................................................................ 51 2.5.10 Formation of dikaryotic mycelia from monokaryotic Laccaria strains ............... 52 2.5.10.1 Microscopic analysis of fused fungal strains ..................................................... 53 3 Results ..................................................................................... 54 3.1 Selection of genes for RNAi suppression .......................................................... 54 3.2 Identification of potential MSN-like factors ........................................................ 58 3.3 Growth behaviour of Laccaria bicolor wild type mycelia .................................... 60 3.4 Construction of fungal transformation vectors ................................................... 65 3.4.1 Isolation of genomic DNA from Laccaria bicolor ............................................................... 65 3.4.1.1 Genomic DNA fragments as template for construction of inverted repeats ...... 65 3.4.2 Integration of inverted
Recommended publications
  • The Bacteria Associated with Laccaria Laccata Ectomycorrhizas Or Sporocarps: Effect on Symbiosis Establishment on Douglas Fir*
    Symbiosis, 9 (1990) 267-273 267 Balaban Publishers, Philadelphia/Rehovot The Bacteria Associated with Laccaria Laccata Ectomycorrhizas or Sporocarps: Effect on Symbiosis Establishment on Douglas Fir* J. GARBA YE, R. DUPONNOIS and J.L. WAHL IN RA, Centre de recherches [orestieres de Nancy, Champenoux, F 54280 Seichamps Abstract A range of bacteria isolated form mycorrhizas and sporocarps of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata were tested for their effect on ectomycorrhizal development of this fungus on Douglas fir seedlings, both in containers in the glasshouse and in a bare-root nursery. Some of them reduced infection, but some others were very stimulating. These results are discussed from the standpoint of both ecology of mycorrhizal symbioses and forestry practice. Introduction It has been shown on different plant - fungus couples that bacteria present in soil, rhizosphere and mycorrhizas strongly interact with the establishment of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, with the frequent occurrence of a stimulating effect (Bowen and Theodorou, 1979; Garbaye and Bowen, 1987 and 1989; De Oliveira, 1988; De Oliveira et Garbaye, 1989). Some stimulating ("helper") isolates could be of practical interest for improving mycorrhizal inoculation techniques in forest nurseries. Douglas fir is presently the dominant forest tree used for reforestation in France, and field experiments have shown that the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata, when inoculated to planting stocks in the nursery, stimulates the early growth of Douglas fir in plantations (Le Tacon et al., 1988). Moreover, L. laccata sporocarps always contain bacteria, suggesting that this fungus may be particularly dependent on some associated bacteria for completing its life cycle. Therefore, it is worth exploring the possibilities of using helper bacteria in this system.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Hydropus Mediterraneus</I>
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2012. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/121.393 Volume 121, pp. 393–403 July–September 2012 Laccariopsis, a new genus for Hydropus mediterraneus (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) Alfredo Vizzini*, Enrico Ercole & Samuele Voyron Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi - Università degli Studi di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125, Torino, Italy *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Laccariopsis (Agaricales) is a new monotypic genus established for Hydropus mediterraneus, an arenicolous species earlier often placed in Flammulina, Oudemansiella, or Xerula. Laccariopsis is morphologically close to these genera but distinguished by a unique combination of features: a Laccaria-like habit (distant, thick, subdecurrent lamellae), viscid pileus and upper stipe, glabrous stipe with a long pseudorhiza connecting with Ammophila and Juniperus roots and incorporating plant debris and sand particles, pileipellis consisting of a loose ixohymeniderm with slender pileocystidia, large and thin- to thick-walled spores and basidia, thin- to slightly thick-walled hymenial cystidia and caulocystidia, and monomitic stipe tissue. Phylogenetic analyses based on a combined ITS-LSU sequence dataset place Laccariopsis close to Gloiocephala and Rhizomarasmius. Key words — Agaricomycetes, Physalacriaceae, /gloiocephala clade, phylogeny, taxonomy Introduction Hydropus mediterraneus was originally described by Pacioni & Lalli (1985) based on collections from Mediterranean dune ecosystems in Central Italy, Sardinia, and Tunisia. Previous collections were misidentified as Laccaria maritima (Theodor.) Singer ex Huhtinen (Dal Savio 1984) due to their laccarioid habit. The generic attribution to Hydropus Kühner ex Singer by Pacioni & Lalli (1985) was due mainly to the presence of reddish watery droplets on young lamellae and sarcodimitic tissue in the stipe (Corner 1966, Singer 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Sequence Analysis of Auricularia Heimuer Combined with Genetic Linkage Map
    Journal of Fungi Article Genome Sequence Analysis of Auricularia heimuer Combined with Genetic Linkage Map Ming Fang 1, Xiaoe Wang 2, Ying Chen 2, Peng Wang 2, Lixin Lu 2, Jia Lu 2, Fangjie Yao 1,2,* and Youmin Zhang 1,* 1 Lab of genetic breeding of edible mushromm, Horticultural, College of Horticulture, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; [email protected] 2 Engineering Research Centre of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (Y.C.); [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (J.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.Y.); [email protected] (Y.Z.) Received: 3 March 2020; Accepted: 12 March 2020; Published: 16 March 2020 Abstract: Auricularia heimuer is one of the most popular edible fungi in China. In this study, the whole genome of A. heimuer was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X system and compared with other mushrooms genomes. As a wood-rotting fungus, a total of 509 carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) were annotated in order to explore its potential capabilities on wood degradation. The glycoside hydrolases (GH) family genes in the A. heimuer genome were more abundant than the genes in the other 11 mushrooms genomes. The A. heimuer genome contained 102 genes encoding class III, IV, and V ethanol dehydrogenases. Evolutionary analysis based on 562 orthologous single-copy genes from 15 mushrooms showed that Auricularia formed an early independent branch of Agaricomycetes. The mating-type locus of A. heimuer was located on linkage group 8 by genetic linkage analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection in Fungi
    Sexual selection in Fungi Bart P. S. Nieuwenhuis Thesis committee Thesis supervisor Prof. dr. R.F. Hoekstra Emeritus professor of Genetics (Population and Quantitative Genetics) Wageningen University Thesis co-supervisor Dr. D.K. Aanen Assistant professor at the Laboratory of Genetics Wageningen University Other members Prof. dr. J. B. Anderson, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Prof. dr. W. de Boer, NIOO, Wageningen and Wageningen University Prof. dr. P.G.L. Klinkhamer, Leiden University, Leiden Prof. dr. H.A.B. Wösten, Utrecht Univesity, Utrecht This research was conducted under the auspices of the C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation (PE&RC) Sexual selection in Fungi Bart P. S. Nieuwenhuis Thesis submittted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Friday 21 September 2012 at 4 p.m. in the Aula. Bart P. S. Nieuwenhuis Sexual selection in Fungi Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2012) With references, with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN 978-94-6173-358-0 Contents Chapter 1 7 General introduction Chapter 2 17 Why mating types are not sexes Chapter 3 31 On the asymmetry of mating in the mushroom fungus Schizophyllum commune Chapter 4 49 Sexual selection in mushroom-forming basidiomycetes Chapter 5 59 Fungal fidelity: Nuclear divorce from a dikaryon by mating or monokaryon regeneration Chapter 6 69 Fungal nuclear arms race: experimental evolution for increased masculinity in a mushroom Chapter 7 89 Sexual selection in the fungal kingdom Chapter 8 109 Discussion: male and female fitness Bibliography 121 Summary 133 Dutch summary 137 Dankwoord 147 Curriculum vitea 153 Education statement 155 6 Chapter 1 General introduction Bart P.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Mushrooms Have Evolved to Be So Promiscuous: Insights from Evolutionary and Ecological Patterns
    fungal biology reviews 29 (2015) 167e178 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fbr Review Why mushrooms have evolved to be so promiscuous: Insights from evolutionary and ecological patterns Timothy Y. JAMES* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA article info abstract Article history: Agaricomycetes, the mushrooms, are considered to have a promiscuous mating system, Received 27 May 2015 because most populations have a large number of mating types. This diversity of mating Received in revised form types ensures a high outcrossing efficiency, the probability of encountering a compatible 17 October 2015 mate when mating at random, because nearly every homokaryotic genotype is compatible Accepted 23 October 2015 with every other. Here I summarize the data from mating type surveys and genetic analysis of mating type loci and ask what evolutionary and ecological factors have promoted pro- Keywords: miscuity. Outcrossing efficiency is equally high in both bipolar and tetrapolar species Genomic conflict with a median value of 0.967 in Agaricomycetes. The sessile nature of the homokaryotic Homeodomain mycelium coupled with frequent long distance dispersal could account for selection favor- Outbreeding potential ing a high outcrossing efficiency as opportunities for choosing mates may be minimal. Pheromone receptor Consistent with a role of mating type in mediating cytoplasmic-nuclear genomic conflict, Agaricomycetes have evolved away from a haploid yeast phase towards hyphal fusions that display reciprocal nuclear migration after mating rather than cytoplasmic fusion. Importantly, the evolution of this mating behavior is precisely timed with the onset of diversification of mating type alleles at the pheromone/receptor mating type loci that are known to control reciprocal nuclear migration during mating.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
    Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • DPR Journal 2016 Corrected Final.Pmd
    Bul. Dept. Pl. Res. No. 38 (A Scientific Publication) Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Plant Resources Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal 2016 ISSN 1995 - 8579 Bulletin of Department of Plant Resources No. 38 PLANT RESOURCES Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Plant Resources Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal 2016 Advisory Board Mr. Rajdev Prasad Yadav Ms. Sushma Upadhyaya Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Rai Managing Editor Sudhita Basukala Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Dharma Raj Dangol Dr. Nirmala Joshi Ms. Keshari Maiya Rajkarnikar Ms. Jyoti Joshi Bhatta Ms. Usha Tandukar Ms. Shiwani Khadgi Mr. Laxman Jha Ms. Ribita Tamrakar No. of Copies: 500 Cover Photo: Hypericum cordifolium and Bistorta milletioides (Dr. Keshab Raj Rajbhandari) Silene helleboriflora (Ganga Datt Bhatt), Potentilla makaluensis (Dr. Hiroshi Ikeda) Date of Publication: April 2016 © All rights reserved Department of Plant Resources (DPR) Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977-1-4251160, 4251161, 4268246 E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Name of the author, year of publication. Title of the paper, Bul. Dept. Pl. Res. N. 38, N. of pages, Department of Plant Resources, Kathmandu, Nepal. ISSN: 1995-8579 Published By: Mr. B.K. Khakurel Publicity and Documentation Section Dr. K.R. Bhattarai Department of Plant Resources (DPR), Kathmandu,Ms. N. Nepal. Joshi Dr. M.N. Subedi Reviewers: Dr. Anjana Singh Ms. Jyoti Joshi Bhatt Prof. Dr. Ram Prashad Chaudhary Mr. Baidhya Nath Mahato Dr. Keshab Raj Rajbhandari Ms. Rose Shrestha Dr. Bijaya Pant Dr. Krishna Kumar Shrestha Ms. Shushma Upadhyaya Dr. Bharat Babu Shrestha Dr. Mahesh Kumar Adhikari Dr. Sundar Man Shrestha Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruiting Body Form, Not Nutritional Mode, Is the Major Driver of Diversification in Mushroom-Forming Fungi
    Fruiting body form, not nutritional mode, is the major driver of diversification in mushroom-forming fungi Marisol Sánchez-Garcíaa,b, Martin Rybergc, Faheema Kalsoom Khanc, Torda Vargad, László G. Nagyd, and David S. Hibbetta,1 aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610; bUppsala Biocentre, Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-75005 Uppsala, Sweden; cDepartment of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; and dSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved October 16, 2020 (received for review December 22, 2019) With ∼36,000 described species, Agaricomycetes are among the and the evolution of enclosed spore-bearing structures. It has most successful groups of Fungi. Agaricomycetes display great di- been hypothesized that the loss of ballistospory is irreversible versity in fruiting body forms and nutritional modes. Most have because it involves a complex suite of anatomical features gen- pileate-stipitate fruiting bodies (with a cap and stalk), but the erating a “surface tension catapult” (8, 11). The effect of gas- group also contains crust-like resupinate fungi, polypores, coral teroid fruiting body forms on diversification rates has been fungi, and gasteroid forms (e.g., puffballs and stinkhorns). Some assessed in Sclerodermatineae, Boletales, Phallomycetidae, and Agaricomycetes enter into ectomycorrhizal symbioses with plants, Lycoperdaceae, where it was found that lineages with this type of while others are decayers (saprotrophs) or pathogens. We constructed morphology have diversified at higher rates than nongasteroid a megaphylogeny of 8,400 species and used it to test the following lineages (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Mushrooms 4/16/2021 Susan Mcdougall
    Olympic Mushrooms 4/16/2021 Susan McDougall With links to species’ pages 206 species Family Scientific Name Common Name Agaricaceae Agaricus augustus Giant agaricus Agaricaceae Agaricus hondensis Felt-ringed Agaricus Agaricaceae Agaricus silvicola Forest Agaric Agaricaceae Chlorophyllum brunneum Shaggy Parasol Agaricaceae Chlorophyllum olivieri Olive Shaggy Parasol Agaricaceae Coprinus comatus Shaggy inkcap Agaricaceae Crucibulum laeve Common bird’s nest fungus Agaricaceae Cyathus striatus Fluted bird’s nest Agaricaceae Cystoderma amianthinum Pure Cystoderma Agaricaceae Cystoderma cf. gruberinum Agaricaceae Gymnopus acervatus Clustered Collybia Agaricaceae Gymnopus dryophilus Common Collybia Agaricaceae Gymnopus luxurians Agaricaceae Gymnopus peronatus Wood woolly-foot Agaricaceae Lepiota clypeolaria Shield dapperling Agaricaceae Lepiota magnispora Yellowfoot dapperling Agaricaceae Leucoagaricus leucothites White dapperling Agaricaceae Leucoagaricus rubrotinctus Red-eyed parasol Agaricaceae Morganella pyriformis Warted puffball Agaricaceae Nidula candida Jellied bird’s-nest fungus Agaricaceae Nidularia farcta Albatrellaceae Albatrellus avellaneus Amanitaceae Amanita augusta Yellow-veiled amanita Amanitaceae Amanita calyptroderma Ballen’s American Caesar Amanitaceae Amanita muscaria Fly agaric Amanitaceae Amanita pantheriana Panther cap Amanitaceae Amanita vaginata Grisette Auriscalpiaceae Lentinellus ursinus Bear lentinellus Bankeraceae Hydnellum aurantiacum Orange spine Bankeraceae Hydnellum complectipes Bankeraceae Hydnellum suaveolens
    [Show full text]
  • Mating-Type Locus Organization and Mating-Type Chromosome Differentiation in the Bipolar Edible Button Mushroom Agaricus Bisporus
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Mating-Type Locus Organization and Mating-Type Chromosome Differentiation in the Bipolar Edible Button Mushroom Agaricus bisporus Marie Foulongne-Oriol 1 , Ozgur Taskent 2, Ursula Kües 3, Anton S. M. Sonnenberg 4, Arend F. van Peer 4 and Tatiana Giraud 2,* 1 INRAE, MycSA, Mycologie et Sécurité des Aliments, 33882 Villenave d’Ornon, France; [email protected] 2 Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Bâtiment 360, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; [email protected] 3 Molecular Wood Biotechnology and Technical Mycology, Goettingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Büsgen-Institute, University of Goettingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077 Goettingen, Germany; [email protected] 4 Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (A.S.M.S.); [email protected] (A.F.v.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In heterothallic basidiomycete fungi, sexual compatibility is restricted by mating types, typically controlled by two loci: PR, encoding pheromone precursors and pheromone receptors, and HD, encoding two types of homeodomain transcription factors. We analysed the single mating-type locus of the commercial button mushroom variety, Agaricus bisporus var. bisporus, and of the related Citation: Foulongne-Oriol, M.; variety burnettii. We identified the location of the mating-type locus using genetic map and genome Taskent, O.; Kües, U.; Sonnenberg, information, corresponding to the HD locus, the PR locus having lost its mating-type role. We A.S.M.; van Peer, A.F.; Giraud, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Order Number of Species Number of Orders Family Genus Species Japanese Name Properties Phytopathogenicity Date Pref
    Phylum Order Number of species Number of orders family genus species Japanese name properties phytopathogenicity date Pref. points R inhibition H inhibition R SD H SD Basidiomycota Polyporales 98 12 Meruliaceae Abortiporus Abortiporus biennis ニクウチワタケ saprobic "+" 2004-07-18 Kumamoto Haru, Kikuchi 40.4 -1.6 7.6 3.2 Basidiomycota Agaricales 171 1 Meruliaceae Abortiporus Abortiporus biennis ニクウチワタケ saprobic "+" 2004-07-16 Hokkaido Shari, Shari 74 39.3 2.8 4.3 Basidiomycota Agaricales 269 1 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus arvensis シロオオハラタケ saprobic "-" 2000-09-25 Gunma Kawaba, Tone 87 49.1 2.4 2.3 Basidiomycota Polyporales 181 12 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus bisporus ツクリタケ saprobic "-" 2004-04-16 Gunma Horosawa, Kiryu 36.2 -23 3.6 1.4 Basidiomycota Hymenochaetales 129 8 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus moelleri ナカグロモリノカサ saprobic "-" 2003-07-15 Gunma Hirai, Kiryu 64.4 44.4 9.6 4.4 Basidiomycota Polyporales 105 12 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus moelleri ナカグロモリノカサ saprobic "-" 2003-06-26 Nagano Minamiminowa, Kamiina 70.1 3.7 2.5 5.3 Basidiomycota Auriculariales 37 2 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus subrutilescens ザラエノハラタケ saprobic "-" 2001-08-20 Fukushima Showa 67.9 37.8 0.6 0.6 Basidiomycota Boletales 251 3 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus subrutilescens ザラエノハラタケ saprobic "-" 2000-09-25 Yamanashi Hakusyu, Hokuto 80.7 48.3 3.7 7.4 Basidiomycota Agaricales 9 1 Agaricaceae Agaricus Agaricus subrutilescens ザラエノハラタケ saprobic "-" 85.9 68.1 1.9 3.1 Basidiomycota Hymenochaetales 129 8 Strophariaceae Agrocybe Agrocybe cylindracea ヤナギマツタケ saprobic "-" 2003-08-23
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Land Use on the Diversity of Macrofungi in Kereita Forest Kikuyu Escarpment, Kenya
    Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 8(2): 254–281 (2018) ISSN 2229-2225 www.creamjournal.org Article Doi 10.5943/cream/8/2/10 Copyright © Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences Effects of Land Use on the Diversity of Macrofungi in Kereita Forest Kikuyu Escarpment, Kenya Njuguini SKM1, Nyawira MM1, Wachira PM 2, Okoth S2, Muchai SM3, Saado AH4 1 Botany Department, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658-00100 2 School of Biological Studies, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi 3 Department of Clinical Studies, College of Agriculture & Veterinary Sciences, University of Nairobi. P.O. Box 30197- 00100 4 Department of Climate Change and Adaptation, Kenya Red Cross Society, P.O. Box 40712, Nairobi Njuguini SKM, Muchane MN, Wachira P, Okoth S, Muchane M, Saado H 2018 – Effects of Land Use on the Diversity of Macrofungi in Kereita Forest Kikuyu Escarpment, Kenya. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 8(2), 254–281, Doi 10.5943/cream/8/2/10 Abstract Tropical forests are a haven of biodiversity hosting the richest macrofungi in the World. However, the rate of forest loss greatly exceeds the rate of species documentation and this increases the risk of losing macrofungi diversity to extinction. A field study was carried out in Kereita, Kikuyu Escarpment Forest, southern part of Aberdare range forest to determine effect of indigenous forest conversion to plantation forest on diversity of macrofungi. Macrofungi diversity was assessed in a 22 year old Pinus patula (Pine) plantation and a pristine indigenous forest during dry (short rains, December, 2014) and wet (long rains, May, 2015) seasons.
    [Show full text]