Mariano Rampolla Del Tindaro (1843-1913) Grégory Woimbée

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mariano Rampolla Del Tindaro (1843-1913) Grégory Woimbée Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro (1843-1913) Grégory Woimbée To cite this version: Grégory Woimbée. Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro (1843-1913). Christophe Dickès. Dictionnaire du Vatican et du Saint-Siège, Robert Laffont, p.834-837, 2013, 978-2-221-11654-8. hal-02506908 HAL Id: hal-02506908 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02506908 Submitted on 12 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro (1843-1913) Grégory Woimbée I – Un diplomate exemplaire (1870-1887) Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro naquit en août 1843 à Polizzi Generosa en Sicile, un bourg situé non loin de Palerme. Il appartenait à une famille comtale de la noblesse sicilienne. Il vit la fin du royaume des Deux-Siciles. Lorsque Garibaldi débarqua à Marsala et que la Sicile fut annexée au Piémont puis au tout nouveau royaume d’Italie, il commençait ses études au collège Capranica, prestigieux séminaire romain qui existe toujours aujourd’hui. Devenu prêtre à l’âge de vingt-trois ans, ce « Capranicense », promis à la Curie romaine, entra tout naturellement à l’Académie des nobles ecclésiastiques. Créée par Clément XI en 1701, elle dépend directement de la Secrétairerie d’Etat et forme toujours les membres du Corps diplomatique et les représentants permanents du Saint-Siège sous le nom actuel d’Académie pontificale ecclésiastique. La complexion fragile du jeune ecclésiastique ne l’empêcha pas d’être docteur en théologie, en droit, et de se pencher sur les sciences naturelles et la botanique. Entré à la Curie sous Pie IX, alors que les Etats pontificaux étaient perdus, que le Concile Œcuménique avait décidé d’interrompre ses activités malgré les assurances du Roi d’Italie, que le Pape se considérait prisonnier du Roi, en l’espace de dix-sept ans, il devint le bras droit de Léon XIII et exécuta pour lui une brillante politique étrangère qui jeta les bases d’une nouvelle ère diplomatique du Saint-Siège. Il commença sa carrière diplomatique en 1870 à la Secrétairerie d’Etat comme attaché à la Congrégation des Affaires ecclésiastiques extraordinaires (transformée en 1967 en Conseil pour les Affaires publiques de l’Eglise et devenue en 1988 la Seconde Section de la Secrétairerie d’Etat chargée des relations du Saint-Siège avec les Etats). En poste à la nonciature de Madrid comme conseiller puis comme chargé d’affaires lorsqu’il suppléa le nonce Simeoni démissionnaire (1876), il chercha à rapprocher les carlistes (légitimistes espagnols partisans de « Charles VII ») et les alphonsistes (partisans d’Alphonse XII fils d’Isabelle II), ce qui lui valut en Espagne sa réputation de libéral. En 1877, il fut nommé secrétaire de la section pour les Eglises orientales à la Propagande de la Foi. La Congrégation Propaganda Fide avait été fondée par Grégoire XV en 1622 pour les territoires de mission (Congrégation pour l’Evangélisation des Peuples depuis 1988). En 1862, Pie IX l’avait divisée en deux sections, l’une chargée des Eglises de rite occidental, l’autre chargée des Eglises de rite oriental (en 1908, une Congrégation de la Propagande pour les Rites orientaux fut créée, elle devint la Congrégation pour l’Eglise orientale en 1917, puis la Congrégation pour les Eglises orientales en 1967). En 1880, il devint le secrétaire de la Congrégation pour les Affaires extraordinaires, autrement dit, le chef de la diplomatie pontificale. Envoyé comme Nonce à Madrid deux ans plus tard, où il succèda à Mgr Bianchi, il fut sacré Archevêque avec la titulature in partibus d’Héraclée. Il emmena avec lui Giacomo della Chiesa, futur Benoît XV, ancien Capranicense, qu’il avait repéré à l’Académie des Nobles ecclésiastiques. A Madrid, il chercha à rallier les carlistes à la monarchie constitutionnelle et prépara la médiation du Pape entre Berlin et Madrid à propos des Îles Carolines. Cet archipel du Pacifique situé au Nord-Est de la Nouvelle-Guinée, exploré au XVIe siècle par les Portugais puis les Espagnols, était revendiqué à la fois par les Espagnols et par le nouvel Empire allemand. Rampolla joua au nom de Léon XIII ses bons offices en 1885 et l’archipel échut à l’Espagne qui finit par le vendre aux Allemands en 1899 pour 25 millions de pesetas. En mars 1887, Rampolla fut créé cardinal (Cardinal-Prêtre de la basilique Sainte-Cécile). Le 1er juin, Léon XIII en fit son Secrétaire d’Etat et l’homme de sa politique étrangère. Il avait seulement quarante-quatre ans, tandis que le Pape en avait déjà soixante-dix-sept. Les seize années qui suivirent furent d’une grande intensité politique. 1 II – L’homme de Léon XIII (1887-1903) Rome n’était plus aux seules mains de la Papauté et était devenue la capitale du nouveau Royaume d’Italie, lorsque les 60 Cardinaux réunis en conclave choisirent Gioachino Pecci le 20 février 1878. Léon XIII, s’il se mit dans les pas de son prédécesseur pour soutenir la légitimité du pouvoir temporel du Pape, s’il refusa de renoncer à un seul de ses droits immémoriaux, le fit avec une grande habileté diplomatique. Comme le dit le philosophe Michel Foucault, renversant la célèbre formule de Clausewitz, « la politique est la guerre poursuivie par d’autres moyens » (La volonté de savoir, Paris, Gallimard, 1976, p.121-122). Léon XIII fut un pape doctrinal, soucieux de donner des bases systématiques et philosophiques fortes au Magistère de l’Eglise (délivrant 40 encycliques sur le mariage, la famille, l’Etat, la société), ainsi que politique, tenant compte des avatars institutionnels et sociaux d’idées dont l’Eglise distinguait mal ce qui venait d’elle et ce qui venait contre elle. Lui-même théologien, humaniste et diplomate, il sut s’entourer d’hommes à sa mesure. On se souvient principalement de lui en France pour la Doctrine sociale de l’Eglise (avec l’encyclique Rerum novarum, 15 mai 1891) qui canonise et stimule les expériences européennes du catholicisme social, et le Ralliement à la République française (avec l’encyclique Au milieu des sollicitudes, 16 février 1892). Dès 1887 et jusqu’à sa mort, Rampolla fut l’homme de cette ligne subtile de refondation politique et d’affermissement doctrinal face à l’exacerbation des politiques européennes anti-cléricales. Ce choix « correspondit à un tournant important du pontificat : le rapprochement avec la France résultait moins des déceptions venues des puissances centrales que de la conviction que les formes démocratiques de gouvernement commandées par les opinions publiques devenues ‘maîtresses du monde’ l’emporteraient désormais. » (Jacques Gadille, dans Histoire du Christianisme vol. 11, chap.V, p.476-477) Ce rapprochement avec la République française anticléricale permettait le maintien du Concordat napoléonien et le soutien républicain aux missions catholiques. Ainsi la République de Gambetta continuait à respecter non sans arrière-pensée cette double tradition du Concordat à l’intérieur et du Protectorat à l’extérieur. Le cardinal Lavigerie fut le relais de ce rapprochement papal avec la République. Si la Papauté se désolidarisa des monarchies et comptait toujours autant sur la puissance de l’Eglise de France, même dans une France républicaine, elle demeura inflexible sur la question du pouvoir temporel qu’elle considérait comme la seule garantie de son indépendance. Le rapprochement avec la France faisait aussi partie d’un plan d’internationalisation de la question romaine. D’une manière générale, Rampolla représenta le gage d’un tournant libéral, mais on aurait tort de croire à une option libérale du pontificat. Mieux vaudrait parler d’une option « politique » visant à rétablir l’autorité et l’indépendance de la Papauté, quitte à négliger les politiques intérieures dont les prodromes fleuraient la Séparation. Ce qui valut pour la France valut aussi pour l’Allemagne et la Suisse avec lesquelles le Saint-Siège assouplit ses relations. Cette politique centrée sur le devenir de la Papauté elle-même et la question romaine eut pour conséquence d’affaiblir les soutiens catholiques traditionnels et anti-modernes, notamment en Espagne et en France et de passer relativement outre les politiques sécularistes (surtout en matière scolaire) menées par les Etats au détriment des Eglises « ralliées ». III – L’homme qui faillit être Pape (1903) Lorsque le conclave s’ouvrit avec 62 cardinaux (dont la grande majorité était italienne) le 31 juillet 1903, le successeur de Léon XIII avait besoin de 42 voix. Dès le premier tour, Rampolla fut le favori avec 24 voix ; au deuxième tour, le 1er août, il en obtint 29. Contre toute attente, le Cardinal Archevêque de Cracovie, Mgr Jan Puzyna de Kosielsko fit une déclaration au nom de 2 l’Empereur d’Autriche-Hongrie. François-Joseph entendait faire usage de son « exclusive », sorte de droit de veto revendiqué par les souverains catholiques. Rampolla protesta publiquement devant les Cardinaux, soutenu notamment et provisoirement par les Cardinaux français. Au tour suivant, il obtint 30 voix. Parallèlement, le patriarche de Venise, Mgr Joseph Sarto, à mesure qu’il protesta et demanda à ses confrères de ne pas l’élire, obtint 5, puis 10, puis 21 voix. Les Français tentèrent alors de dissuader le diplomate Rampolla et essayèrent de trouver un candidat de compromis. Rampolla refusa et en fit une question de principe. Lorsque Sarto, grande figure de pasteur et déjà auréolé de sainteté renonça à s’opposer à son élection, après des tourments personnels décrits par le cardinal Gibbons et Mgr Merry del Val, il obtint 35 voix puis le 4 août, 50 voix.
Recommended publications
  • Apostolic Lines of Succession-10-2018
    Apostolic Lines of Succession for ++Michael David Callahan, DD, OCR, OCarm. The Catholic Church in America “Have you an apostolic succession? Unfold the line of your bishops.” Tertullian, 3rd century A.D. A special visible expression of Apostolic Succession is given in the consecration/ ordination of a bishop through the laying on of hands by other bishops who have, themselves, been ordained in the same manner through a succession of bishops leading back to the apostles of Jesus. The role of the bishop must always be understood within the context of the authentic handing on of the faith from one generation to the next generation of the whole Church, beginning with the Christian community of the time of the Apostles. Thus, as the Church is the continuation of the apostolic community, so the bishops are the continuation of the ministry of the college of the apostles of Jesus within that apostolic community. It is essentially collegial rather than monarchical. This tradition is affirmed in the teaching ministry of Church leadership, and authentically celebrated in the sacraments, with particular attention to the sacrament of holy orders (ordination) and the laying on of hands. Apostolic Succession is the belief of Catholic Christians that the bishops are successors of the original apostles of Jesus. This is understood as the bishops being ordained into the episcopal collegium or “sacramental order.” As bishops are by tradition consecrated by at least three other bishops, the actual number of lists of succession can become quite substantial. Listed here are three lines of succession: 1. From Saints Paul and Linus Succession through Archbishop Baladad 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages
    Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages by Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler 2018 Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This dissertation, ‘Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages’, investigates changing perceptions of perjury and false witness in the late antique and early medieval world. Focusing on primary sources from the Latin-speaking, western Roman empire and former empire, approximately between the late third and seventh centuries CE, this thesis proposes that perjury and false witness were transformed into criminal behaviours, grave sins, and canonical offences in Latin legal and religious writings of the period. Chapter 1, ‘Introduction: The Problem of Perjury’s Criminalization’, calls attention to anomalies in the history and historiography of the oath. Although the oath has been well studied, oath violations have not; moreover, important sources for medieval culture – Roman law and the Christian New Testament – were largely silent on the subject of perjury. For classicists in particular, perjury was not a crime, while oath violations remained largely peripheral to early Christian ethical discussions. Chapter 2, ‘Criminalization: Perjury and False Witness in Late Roman Law’, begins to explain how this situation changed by documenting early possible instances of penalization for perjury. Diverse sources such as Christian martyr acts, provincial law manuals, and select imperial ii and post-imperial legislation suggest that numerous cases of perjury were criminalized in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George
    The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. James Michael St. George © Copyright 2014-2015, The International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. 1 Table of Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................4 ......................................................................................................................................................................5 Photos ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Lines of Succession........................................................................................................................................7 Succession from the Chaldean Catholic Church .......................................................................................7 Succession from the Syrian-Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch..............................................................10 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................16 Succession from the Russian Orthodox Church......................................................................................20 Succession from the Melkite-Greek Patriarchate of Antioch and all East..............................................27 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession .........................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografía I. Boletín De Historia De La Teología En El Período 1500-1800
    Archivo Teológico Granadino 67 (2004) 231-421 BIBLIOGRAFÍA I. BOLETÍN DE HISTORIA DE LA TEOLOGÍA EN EL PERÍODO 1500-1800 Autores Acosta, José de SASTRE, E., Gli “altri” visti dal missionario gesuita Padre José de Acosta (1600): Euntes Docete 56 (2003) 189-208. Este estudio pretende mostrar un ejemplo de aproximación a “los otros”, a los pueblos de las diversas Indias, a finales del siglo XVI. Se basa en el análisis de las dos célebres obras de Acosta, Historia natural y moral de las Indias y De procuranda indorum salute. Expone primero la visión de “los otros” en la perspectiva misionera de Acosta, los tres géneros de “otros” en las Indias, orientales y occidentales: los primeros, más civilizados, como eran los chinos, japoneses y otros de India oriental, los segundos, los que sin haber alcanzado la escritura, ni los conocimientos civiles, tienen su organización social, como eran los mejicanos, peruanos, y la tercera clase, bárbaros, que se diferencian poco de los animales, como eran muchos del Brasil, Florida, y también en Molucas e islas Salomón. Indica luego la diversa manera de llevarles a ellos el evangelio Por último, el autor indica brevemente algunos apuntes de Acosta sobre el modo de evangelizar a la segunda y tercera clase de “otros”, y la imagen del obispo y del misionero indianos. Ágreda, María de Jesús de LLAMAS, E., O.C.D., La Madre Ágreda y la Mariología del Vaticano II. Salamanca 2003. 121 págs. ISBN 84-607-8014-7. La Congregación para la doctrina de la fe ha declarado que «no se puede afirmar que existan verdaderos errores doctrinales y herejías en la Mística Ciudad de Dios», pero añade que «la presentación que se hace en esa obra de la figura de la Madre de Dios contrasta con la que nos ofrece la Sagrada Escritura y no es compatible con la mariología desarrollada por el Concilio Vaticano II».
    [Show full text]
  • The Rite of Sodomy
    The Rite of Sodomy volume iii i Books by Randy Engel Sex Education—The Final Plague The McHugh Chronicles— Who Betrayed the Prolife Movement? ii The Rite of Sodomy Homosexuality and the Roman Catholic Church volume iii AmChurch and the Homosexual Revolution Randy Engel NEW ENGEL PUBLISHING Export, Pennsylvania iii Copyright © 2012 by Randy Engel All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, write to Permissions, New Engel Publishing, Box 356, Export, PA 15632 Library of Congress Control Number 2010916845 Includes complete index ISBN 978-0-9778601-7-3 NEW ENGEL PUBLISHING Box 356 Export, PA 15632 www.newengelpublishing.com iv Dedication To Monsignor Charles T. Moss 1930–2006 Beloved Pastor of St. Roch’s Parish Forever Our Lady’s Champion v vi INTRODUCTION Contents AmChurch and the Homosexual Revolution ............................................. 507 X AmChurch—Posing a Historic Framework .................... 509 1 Bishop Carroll and the Roots of the American Church .... 509 2 The Rise of Traditionalism ................................. 516 3 The Americanist Revolution Quietly Simmers ............ 519 4 Americanism in the Age of Gibbons ........................ 525 5 Pope Leo XIII—The Iron Fist in the Velvet Glove ......... 529 6 Pope Saint Pius X Attacks Modernism ..................... 534 7 Modernism Not Dead— Just Resting ...................... 538 XI The Bishops’ Bureaucracy and the Homosexual Revolution ... 549 1 National Catholic War Council—A Crack in the Dam ...... 549 2 Transition From Warfare to Welfare ........................ 551 3 Vatican II and the Shaping of AmChurch ................ 561 4 The Politics of the New Progressivism .................... 563 5 The Homosexual Colonization of the NCCB/USCC .......
    [Show full text]
  • Benedict XV's Diplomacy in Greater Syria (S
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Facing the Emergence of the Modern Middle East: Benedict XV’s Diplomacy in Greater Syria (Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine) 1914-1922 A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Agnes Aupepin de Lamothe-Dreuzy Washington, D.C. 2012 Facing the Emergence of the Modern Middle East: Benedict XV’s Diplomacy in Greater Syria (Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine) 1914-1922 Agnes Aupepin de Lamothe-Dreuzy, Ph.D. Director: Jacques M. Gres-Gayer, STD, Ph.D. Pope Benedict XV’s pontificate (1914-1922), misunderstood by his contemporaries and neglected by recent scholarship, coincides with the reshaping of the Middle East, from the beginning of World War One to the assignment of Mandates to France and Britain over Syria and Palestine. This study examines Benedict XV’s diplomacy in Greater Syria. Its unique aspect resides in the combination of two approaches. Benedict’s main priority was to ensure the survival of Christians in the Middle East, providing them with a dynamic ecclesiological structure. The pontiff completed and institutionalized the traditional ecclesiological approach in favor of unionism, with the goal to strengthen the ecclesial structures of the Eastern churches and equip them with solid legal foundations. This ecclesiological approach was integrated in Benedict XV’s global geo-political vision that shifted away from its past Eurocentric vision and was combined with an anticipation of the decolonization era. Benedict completed these guiding principles with a policy of emancipation of the missionary world from the bondage of colonial powers, preparing the Church for an active role in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Loisy's Theological Development Valentine G
    LOISY'S THEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT VALENTINE G. MORAN, S.J. Campion College, Victoria, Australia N DECEMBER 1903 the Congregation of the Holy Office added five I works of Alfred Loisy to its Index of Prohibited Books1 and made their author widely known. Up to this time the Abbé Loisy had written most of his articles and books for seminarians and priests, or for scholars engaged in his own field of biblical studies. He was hardly known to the general public of France; even the Catholic public had only recently begun to hear of him. He wrote about the Scriptures and the questions that critics, particularly in Germany, had been asking for over fifty years about their truth, authorship, and inspiration; and his readiness to accept many of the answers which the critics offered had put him squarely among a small group of Catholic scholars in Europe who wanted to adapt the Church's teaching to the contemporary world, to have the Church absorb, not reject, the results of scientific research that had a bearing on religion and especially on Christianity. Loisy's writing had caused trouble with his superiors before 1903. He had been forced to resign his chair of Scripture at the Institut Catholique of Paris in 1893; in 1900 the Archbishop of Paris forbade the Revue du clergé français2 to publish anything he wrote.3 By that time what had reached the clergy, especially the younger priests, was through them beginning to reach the laity, and the publication by Loisy of several radical articles between 1898 and 1903 caused controversy in the Catholic press.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POCKET GUIDE to the Popes 
    THE POCKET GUIDE TO the Popes RICHARD P. McBRIEN Contents Introduction 1 The Popes 11 Index of Names 339 About the Author Other Books by Richard P. McBrien Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher introduction This book contains the abridged profiles of all of the popes of the Catholic Church organized chronologically according to the dates of their respective terms of office. For the complete profiles, readers should consult the full edition, originally published in hard cover by HarperSanFrancisco in 1997, subsequently released in paperback in 2000, and finally issued in an updated edi- tion that includes Pope Benedict XVI in 2006. The full edition contains many original features; this abridged edition is limited to profiles of individual popes that rely upon secondary source material for their factual and historical content. For a listing of these sources and an explanation of how they were incorporated into the pro- files, the reader should consult the Preface and the Select Bibliography of the full edition. WHAT IS A POPE? The offi ce occupied by the pope is known as the papacy. The pope’s principal title is Bishop of Rome. In addition to his immediate pastoral responsibilities as Bishop of Rome, the pope also exercises a special ministry on be- half of the universal Church. It is called the Petrine min- istry, because the Catholic Church considers the pope to be the successor of the Apostle Peter. As such, he has the 2 the pocket guide to the popes duty to preserve the unity of the worldwide Church and to support all of his brother bishops in the service of their own respective dioceses.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesoutherncross
    The SSoouutthheerrnnCCrroossss August 13 to August 19 , 2014 Reg No. 1920/002058/06 No 4886 www.scross.co.za R7,00 (incl VAT RSA) Pope Francis’ Flashback 1914: Why our peace Top 10 tips for The year of prayers are happiness two popes important Page 10 Page 9 Page 7 SA Church: Witchcraft is rampant By STUART GRAHAM lenge it,” he said. Daswa, said Bishop Rodrigues, was a man HE Church is battling a rise in dark arts who was proud of his Jewish-linked Lemba and witchcraft in rural areas around culture. TSouth Africa, according to Catholic “Benedict Daswa was a man of his culture, leaders. but through his faith in Christ, he realised Holy Cross Sister Phutunywa Siyali, coor - that certain things were wrong with this cul - dinator of the Southern African Bishops’ ture,” Bishop Rodrigues said. Conference’ Culture Office, told The Southern In an incident in November, a 60-year-old Cross that after an earth tremor in central grandmother was accused of using witchcraft South Africa on the afternoon of August 5 “a to cause an accident that killed 30 people on number of people” she encountered had the Moloto Road in Mpumalanga. asked: “Who had caused the earthquake?” Soon after the accident, 33 people were ar - The implication of the question was that rested after they burnt down the elderly Archbishop Stephen Brislin of Cape Town pins the papal Bene Merenti medal on Southern “someone must have practised a kind of woman’s house in Waterval. Cross business manager Pamela davids during a Mass in St Mary’s cathedral.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Orders: a Report on the Evolving Context for Their Evaluation in the Roman Catholic Church
    USCCB > Beliefs And Teachings > Ecumenical And Interreligious > Ecumenical > Anglican ANGLICAN ORDERS: A REPORT ON THE EVOLVING CONTEXT FOR THEIR EVALUATION IN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH INTRODUCTION The Anglican-Roman Catholic Consultation in the United States has since 1986 addressed the question of the evaluation by the Holy See of Anglican orders. In 1985 Jan Cardinal Willebrands, using a phrase taken from the ARCIC Final Report, had recognized that 'a new context' is now affecting the discussion of Anglican orders within the Roman Catholic Church because of the development of the thinking in the two Communions regarding the nature of the eucharist and ordained ministry. It has been the purpose of ARC-USA to discuss and to outline the positive dimensions of the 'new context'. We wish to underline at the outset the limits of this study. We have focused our attention on factors that seem most to encourage the reconciliation of our two Communions. Other observers may point to additional features of Anglican/Roman Catholic relationships in the last century, such as an interpretation of Apostolicæ Curæ as an infallible pronouncement of the Holy See, the encyclical Mortalium Animos of 1928, or the reluctance of some Anglicans to move toward belief in the eucharist celebration as a sacrifice. And there are recent developments which have been omitted from consideration in this statement, such as the ordination of women to the priesthood and episcopate within the Anglican Communion. No realistic observer can exclude these events for 'the new context'. Yet we have acted on the suggestion of Cardinal Willebrands in his 1985 letter that it is the negative judgment of Pope Leo XIII in Apostolicæ Curæ (1896) against the validity of Anglican ordinations that is still 'the most fundamental' issue that hinders the mutual recognition of ministries between the Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Troubled Origins of the Italian Catholic Labor Movement, 1878-1914
    The Troubled Origins of the Italian Catholic Labor Movement, 1878–1914 The Troubled Origins.indd 1 07/03/17 2:48 am The Troubled Origins.indd 2 07/03/17 2:48 am The Troubled Origins of the Italian Catholic Labor Movement, 1878–1914 Sándor Agócs Wayne State University Press Detroit 1988 The Troubled Origins.indd 3 07/03/17 2:48 am Copyright © 1988 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48202. All material in this work, except as identified below, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/. All material not licensed under a Creative Commons license is all rights reserved. Permission must be obtained from the copyright owner to use this material. The publication of this volume in a freely accessible digital format has been made possible by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Mellon Foundation through their Humanities Open Book Program. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Agócs, Sándor, 1932- The troubled origins of the Italian Catholic labor movement, 1878–1914 / Sándor Agócs. p. cm. Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN 978–0–8143–4330–2 (alk. paper); 978–0–8143–4331–9 (ebook) I. Trade-unions, Catholic—Italy—History. 2. Church and social problems—Italy—Catholic Church—History. 3. Church and labor— Italy—History. 4. Catholic Church—Doctrines—History. I. Title. HD6481.2.18A38 1988 33 1.88’0945-dc19 87–31961 CIP Exhaustive efforts were made to obtain permission for use material in this text.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Succession Of: the Most Rev'd Dr
    The Apostolic Succession Of: The Most Rev’d Dr. RICARDO LORITE DE LIMA (Archiepiscopus Brasilia) Installed Archbishop Primate of The Anglican Chuch of Brazil and Archbishop of The Anglican Independent Communion Worldwide for Brazil in 15th January 2006 Consecrated as Bishop in 15th January 2006 Consecrator: The Rt. Rev’d. Barry Frank Peachey CJ Metropolitan Chanceler of The Anglican Independent Communion Worldwide Co-consecrators: The Most Rev’d. Dr. Norman Sydney Dutton CJ – “in absentia” Metropolitan Archbishop of The Anglican Independent Communion Worldwide The Most Rev’d. Iranildo Macieira da Silva (Dom Lucas) Metropolitan Primate Archbishop of The Latin Episcopal Church of Brazil PETRINE LINE (Roman Catholic Succession) (1) St. Peter, 38; (2) St. Linus, 67; (3) St. Ancletus {Cletus}, 76; (4) St. Clement, 88; (5) St. Evaristus, 97; (6) St. Alexander I, 105; (7) St. Sixtus I, 115; (8) St. Telesphorus, 125; (9) St. Hygimus, 136; (10) St. Pius I, 140; (11) St. Anicetus, 155; (12) St. Soter, 166; (13) St. Eleutherius, 175; (14) St. Victor I, 189; (15) St. Zephyrinus, 199; 1 (16) St. Callistus I, 217; (17) St. Urban I, 222; (18) St. Pontian, 230; (19) St. Anterus, 235; (20) St. Fabian, 236; (21) St. Cornelius, 251; (22) St. Lucius I, 253; (23) St. Stephen I, 254; (24) St. Sixtus II, 257; (25) St. Dionysius, 259; (26) St. Felix I, 269; (27) St. Eutychian, 275; (28) St. Caius, 283; (29) St. Marcellinus, 296; (30) St. Marcellus I, 308; (31) St. Eucebius, 309; (32) St. Melchiades {Miltiades}, 311; (33) St. Sylvester I, 314; (34) St. Marcus, 336; (35) St.
    [Show full text]