Example of Positioning Intermodal Terminals On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Example of Positioning Intermodal Terminals On N.Brnjac,I.Æavar:ExampleofPositioningIntermodalTerminalsonInlandWaterways NIKOLINABRNJAC,Ph.D. IntermodalTransport E-mail:[email protected] Review IVANAÆAVAR,B.Eng. Accepted:Apr.21,2009 E-mail:[email protected] Approved:Oct.22,2009 UniversityofZagreb, FacultyofTransportandTrafficSciences Vukeliæeva4,HR-10000Zagreb,RepublicofCroatia N.Brnjac,I.Æavar:ExampleofPositioningIntermodalTerminalsonInlandWaterways 433-439 EXAMPLEOFPOSITIONINGINTERMODAL TERMINALSONINLANDWATERWAYS ABSTRACT and identifies the main problems and bottlenecks of the process and the operation at terminals. Still, the Positioning of intermodal terminals is of key importance time losses and high costs do not refer only to the pro- since it affects the very investment into the terminal, ecological, cesses at terminals. Attention needs to be directed to physical issues and the costs of the operation of individual ter- the entire intermodal chain. The integration of all the minals. Detailed analysis has to be performed by decision-mak- participants in intermodal transport by using informa- ing regarding the siting of intermodal terminals. The work ana- lyzes the relevant criteria necessary for the siting of intermodal tion systems and communication technologies (carri- terminals. The problem of the proposed research is the structure ers, logistic service providers, rail operators, inter- of intermodal systems in the Republic of Croatia with the case modal operators, terminal operators, forwarding study of inland waterways. The research and the study of the agents, agents, shippers, etc.) makes the integration of characteristics of intermodal terminals network on inland wa- variousprocessesevenmorecomplex. terways should result in a concept of system reorganization, i. e. This has been implemented in accordance with the terminal planning methodology. By analysing relevant indica- organizational, operative and infrastructural prob- tors according to the existing facts, and by using scientific meth- ods and methodologies, the relevant criteria necessary to define lems that affect the quality and success of the terminal the position and categories of intermodal terminals on inland operation and the entire intermodal transport. This waterways in the Republic of Croatia have been defined and paper recognizes the main barriers to the terminal op- evaluated on the examples of Sisak, Osijek, Vukovar and Sla- eration: vonskiBrod. – organizational problems: inadequate form of ter- KEYWORDS minal organization, differences between operative concept of rail transport and the terminal concept, intermodal terminal, intermodal transport, location criteria, in- absence of cooperation between different inter- landwaterways modaltransportstakeholders; – problems of management and operative problems: 1. INTRODUCTION limited working hours of the terminal, absence or poor management of arriving trucks, inefficient in- In the area of intermodal transport in Europe and ternal administrative processes, insufficient safety the world, a large number of projects and studies have management systems, low awareness of the termi- been carried out, both at international and national nal operator regarding environmental issues, prob- level. The means from the programs such as the lems in communication and lack of efficiency, poor Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Frame Program of the Euro- control of containers at arrival, insufficient infor- pean Union1, Marco Polo2, INTERREG III3, mation flow in case of delay, poor control of opera- CARDS4, etc. are used to finance numerous projects tionsinrealtime; regarding transport and intermodality, in the majority – infrastructural problems: shortage of storage of cases based on terminal infrastructure, analysis of space, lack of packaging space, insufficient capac- cargo flows as well as the network of intermodal termi- ity of crane / manipulation, incompatible transport nalsintheEUregion. means / loading units / terminal equipment, poor Since the terminal is the central part of the entire rail connections with the terminal, failures and intermodal transport chain, in order to identify rele- equipment malfunctions, insufficient equipment vant indicators of the quality and performance, the and inadequate procedures for dangerous cargo work analyzes the important processes at terminals, handling,etc. Promet–Traffic&Transportation,Vol.21,2009,No.6, 433-439 433 N.Brnjac,I.Æavar:ExampleofPositioningIntermodalTerminalsonInlandWaterways The purpose of research is to analyze the complexity ban centres. Legal regulations approve or prohibit the and the problems of intermodal system, i. e. the loca- land usage for the terminal development. The eco- tion of intermodal terminals, their elements and the nomic factor plays an important role in terminal selec- interaction of the subsystem according to the follow- tion since the presence of big industrial enterprises in ing criteria: physical, technical, technological, and or- the environment of potential intermodal terminals ganizational, all for the purpose of identifying relevant can have a crucial and incentive influence on their de- criteria necessary to locate the network of intermodal velopment. The catchment areas of the terminal are terminalsoninlandwaterways. determined by the number, structure and location of logistic users and the accompanying services provided by the intermodal terminal. The factors that affect the 2. TECHNOLOGICALELEMENTSOF catchmentareadefinitioninclude[3]: PLANNINGINTERMODAL 1. structureofservicesattheterminal; TERMINALS 2. usersofterminalservices; 3. structureoftrafficflows; Several different criteria affect the site selection of 4. trafficcorridors; the intermodal terminal. The most important criteria 5. geo-traffic location of the place in which the termi- are the criteria of cargo flows, technical, technologi- nalisaccommodated; cal, location and organizational criteria. The physical 6. trafficconnectionsofterminalswiththeusers; and technological characteristics of intermodal termi- nals depend on several factors which are used to clas- 7. status of the terminal in the network (local, re- sifytheterminalsaccordingto[1]: gional,national). The catchment area, geographic position, trans- – type of intermodal units (transport technologies port corridors and traffic flows classify the terminals and the structure of intermodal units affect the into four categories: global, international, national generation of different forms of intermodal trans- and local; whereas physical possibilities for the con- port); struction of a terminal refer to its micro and macro en- – positioninthetransportchain; vironment. – connectionstoothertransportbranches; Some of the criteria for the decision-making in – functionsattheterminal; planning terminal site selection are divided according – areaofcoverage; to[4]: – roleofcontainertransport,etc. a) analysis of the technical feasibility of the terminal The location of terminals depends on the number (infrastructure,transportequipment…) of users who will use a certain terminal. The structure For successful introduction and implementation of and characteristics of the flows determine the type of innovations in the area of terminal organization and intermodal terminal and affect the very site selection. technology a number of factors are considered. For Due to their specific characteristics the technologies the innovations to be sustainable their interoperability of the transport chains of container terminal, Ro-Ro with the conventional technologies is important. terminals, huckepack terminals, also affect the site se- Therefore,thefollowinghastobedetermined: lection. The technology requires a certain infrastruc- – used intermodal transport units (containers, semi- ture,facilitiesandsuperstructure. -trailers,exchangeabletruckcases,etc.); The characteristics of an efficient intermodal ter- – transport equipment (wagons, trucks, container minal include [2]: location, access to road and rail ships); routes, accompanying servicing activities and techni- cal equipment. The terminals located close to urban – connection of potential new terminals into the ex- areas need to have characteristics of logistic distribu- istinginfrastructurenetwork; tion centres. The modifications of the existing termi- – implementation of the regulations – harmoniza- nals are reflected in their technical, technological and tionoftheactsandregulations; environmental possibilities. Transport characteristics – need to take over the cargo transport liability in the have an important influence on the site selection of entire transport chain and improvement of the ex- intermodal terminals. Apart from a good location, istingpersonnel; also the connection to the European traffic corridor – characteristicsofterminalenvironment. network is important. Economically looking, inter- Up to now, about USD30 billion have been in- modal terminal on a transport corridor has the devel- vested into ISO containers, as well as 30 billion in cel- opment priority. The ecological and climatic actors lular ships that transport them [6]. There is the need to also influence the site selection. Especially in case of implement into new IT technologies at the terminal, in dangerous cargo, the terminal has to be located at a the promotion of standardization of units (electronic certain distance away from the densely populated ur- certificates ISO 18185 at the terminal are understood 434 Promet–Traffic&Transportation,Vol.21,2009,No.6, 433-439 N.Brnjac,I.Æavar:ExampleofPositioningIntermodalTerminalsonInlandWaterways as the standards
Recommended publications
  • JANAF Oil Pipeline & Storage Company
    JANAF Oil Pipeline & Storage Company JANAF IN EUROPEAN OIL PIPELINE NETWORK 2 JANAF pipeline has significant role in oil supply to refineries of SE & Central Europe 1979-2014 - 201 mil. tons , oil transport JANAF JANAF – ADRIA PIPELINES EU PROJECT OF COMMON INTEREST 3 JANAF is recognized as EU strategic pipeline through project of common interest entitled JANAF-Adria pipelines: reconstruction, upgrade, maintenance and capacity increase of the existing JANAF and Adria oil pipelines linking Croatian Omišalj seaport to the Southern Druzhba JANAF – Adria is one of six oil pipelines PCI and one of 248 energy PCI adopted by EC in 2013 Promoters of the PCI are JANAF (Croatia), MOL (HU) and Transpetrol (SK) JANAF OIL PIPELINE ALLOWS FREE FLOW OF CRUDE OIL ACROSS BORDERS AND SECURE SUPPLY IN EU AND SE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ENERGY UNION PRINCIPLE 4 Refinery capacities (MT): Total 37,7 MT Rijeka (Croatia) 4,5 Sisak (Croatia) 2,2 Pancevo (Serbia) 4,8 Novi Sad (Serbia) 2,5 Brod (Bosnia and Herz.) 1,3 Szazhalombatta (Hungary) 8,1 Slovnaft (Slovakia) 6,1 Kralupy & Lilvinov (Czech R.) 8,2 JANAF STORES COMPULSORY CRUDE OIL & PETROLEUM PRODUCTS STOCKS 5 Omišalj Terminal 240.000 m3 (crude oil) Sisak Terminal 240.000 m3 (crude oil) Žitnjak, Zagreb Terminal 100.000 m3 (petrolum products) Small shareholders DUUDI / DAB JANAF OIL PIPELINE & 5% 4% HEP 5% DUUDI / RH DUUDI / STORAGE SYSTEMS 11% HZMO 37% COMPANY PROFILE INA 12% 6 CERP 26% JANAF Plc. performs the activities of crude oil transport, as well as storage and reloading of crude oil and petroleum products Designed capacity - 34 million tons of crude oil transported annually (MTA), while the installed capacity amounts to 20 MTA Length of pipeline - 622 km Omišalj-Urinj subsea oil pipeline linking Omišalj Terminal and INA- Oil Refinery Rijeka Reversal flow on the Sisak-Coatian/Hungarian border-Sisak and Omišalj-Sisak sections (permitting procedure under way) Terminals: Crude oil: Omišalj, Sisak, Virje, Slavonski Brod Capacities:1,540 mil.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for Regional Poverty Differences in Croatia: Exploring the Role of Disparities in Average Income and Inequality
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Accounting for regional poverty differences in Croatia: Exploring the role of disparities in average income and inequality Rubil, Ivica The Institute of Economics, Zagreb 16 January 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43827/ MPRA Paper No. 43827, posted 16 Jan 2013 11:16 UTC ACCOUNTING FOR REGIONAL POVERTY DIFFERENCES IN CROATIA: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF DISPARITIES IN AVERAGE INCOME AND INEQUALITY Ivica Rubil The Institute of Economics, Zagreb January 2013 Abstract The prevalence of poverty in a given population is determined by both the level of average income and the shape of income distribution. Accordingly, the difference in poverty between two populations can be attributed to disparities in their average incomes and in the levels of income inequality. In this paper, we decompose the differences in relative poverty between each of the twenty-one Croatian counties and Croatia as a whole into the contributions of the mean income and income inequality, using the Household Budget Survey data for 2010. The decomposition framework that we utilize here is one usually applied for decompositions of intertemporal poverty changes, and is based on the concept of Shapley value from cooperative game theory. Poverty is measured by three conventional measures – the headcount ratio, the poverty gap, and the squared poverty gap – and robustness of the results to switching from one measure to another is discussed. The results of decompositions show that in most cases both the mean income and inequality differences contribute to poverty variation across the counties, relative to poverty in Croatia as a whole. When poverty is measured by the headcount ratio, the income contribution dominates the inequality contribution, while when we switch to the other two measures, which give more weight to poorer among the poor, the inequality contribution starts to dominate.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Atlas
    FF II CC SS SS Field Information and Capital Elevation Coordination Support Section (Above mean sea level) Division of Operational Services UNHCR Country Office Croatia / National Office 3,250 to 4,000 metres Sources: / Liaison Office 2,500 to 3,250 metres UNHCR, Global Insight digital mapping 1,750 to 2,500 metres © 1998 Europa Technologies Ltd. UNHCR Field Office As of December 2009 1,000 to 1,750 metres UNHCR Field Unit 750 to 1,000 metres The boundaries and names shown International boundary 500 to 750 metres and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement Main road 250 to 500 metres or acceptance by the United Nations. Secondary road 0 to 250 metres g Name_of_the_workspace.WOR !! Villach !! !! !! !! Below mean sea level !! !! Davograd Railway !! Marcali !! Orosháza !! Maribor !! Szank !! !! Cortina d'Ampezzo !! !! !! Mursko Sredisce !! Kalocsa!! Kecel !! Mindszent !! !! !! Kiskunmajsa !! !! Nagykanizsa !! Jesenice Tolna !! Kiskunhalas !! !! Ptuj !! !! Hajós !! !! Hódmezövásárhely!! !! !! !! Tolmezzo !! Böhönye !! !! !! !! !! !! Cakovec !! !! Sostanj !! !! !! Forraaskut !! !! Kaposvár !! !! Balotaszállás!! !! !! !! !! Mezöhe !! Varazdin HUNGARY!! !! Jánoshalma !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Legrad !! !! Ruzsa !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Gemona del Friuli !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Csurgó !! !! Szeged !! Kranj !! Celje !! Nagyatád !! !! !! Ivanec !! !! SLOVENIA !! !! !! Makó !! Durmanec !! Komló !! Maniago !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Koprivnica !! Baja !! Horgos !! Nadlac ! !! Belluno !!
    [Show full text]
  • UP/I 034-03/18-01/015 URBROJ: 580-10/65-2019-008 Zagreb, 20
    KLASA: UP/I 034-03/18-01/015 URBROJ: 580-10/65-2019-008 Zagreb, 20. veljače 2019. Agencija za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja, na temelju članka 31., članka 38. stavaka 5. i 9. te članka 58. stavka 1. točke 15. Zakona o zaštiti tržišnog natjecanja („Narodne novine“, br. 79/09 i 80/13), postupajući po inicijativi poduzetnika Optima Grupa d.o.o. Banja Luka, sa sjedištem u Bosni i Hercegovini, Banja Luci, Kralja Alfonsa XIII 37a, za pokretanje postupka utvrđivanja sprječavanja, ograničavanja ili narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja zlouporabom vladajućeg položaja protiv poduzetnika Jadranski naftovod d.d., sa sjedištem u Zagrebu, Miramarska cesta 24, na temelju odluke Vijeća za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja, u sastavu: Mladen Cerovac, mag. iur., predsjednik Vijeća, Vesna Patrlj, dipl. iur., zamjenica predsjednika Vijeća, dr. sc. Mirta Kapural, mr. sc. Ljiljana Pavlic i Denis Matić, dipl. iur., članovi Vijeća, sa sjednice 4/2019., održane 20. veljače 2019., donosi sljedeće RJEŠENJE Inicijativa se odbacuje jer ne postoje uvjeti za pokretanje postupka po službenoj dužnosti. Obrazloženje 1. Inicijativa za pokretanje postupka Agencija za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja (dalje: Agencija) zaprimila je 21 kolovoza 2018., u smislu članka 37. Zakona o zaštiti tržišnog natjecanja („Narodne novine“, br. 79/09 i 80/13; dalje: ZZTN), inicijativu poduzetnika Optima Grupa d.o.o. Banja Luka, sa sjedištem u Bosni i Hercegovini, Banja Luci, Kralja Alfonsa XIII 37a, zastupanog po odvjetnicima iz odvjetničkog društva [...] (dalje: Optima grupa ili podnositelj inicijative), za pokretanje postupka utvrđivanja zlouporabe vladajućeg položaja protiv poduzetnika Jadranski naftovod d.d., sa sjedištem u Zagrebu, Miramarska cesta 24 (dalje JANAF). Podnositelj inicijative navodi kako je sustav JANAF-a jedini sustav za transport nafte na području Republike Hrvatske i da ne postoje alternativni dobavni pravci niti načini transporta velikih količina nafte.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Radiological Situation in Slavonski Brod, Croatia: Is There a Reason for Concern? 206 Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2017;68:206-211
    Petrinec B, et al. Current radiological situation in Slavonski Brod, Croatia: is there a reason for concern? 206 Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2017;68:206-211 Original article DOI: 10.1515/aiht-2017-68-2992 Current radiological situation in Slavonski Brod, Croatia: is there a reason for concern? Branko Petrinec1, Isabela Tišma2, Marko Šoštarić1, Marina Poje Sovilj2, Dinko Babić1, Vanja Radolić2, Igor Miklavčić2, and Branko Vuković2 Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb1, J. J. Strossmayer University in Osijek, Department of Physics, Osijek2, Croatia [Received in May 2017; Similarity Check in May 2017; Accepted in July 2017] For years, the town of Slavonski Brod in Croatia has been facing serious problems with air pollution, which is usually attributed to an oil refinery across the Sava River in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While the air quality is being monitored rigorously with regard to nonradioactive matter, no attention has been paid to the possibility of a coincidental radioactive pollution. This study is the first to have addressed this issue. We measured ambient dose rate equivalents at 150 sites and found that none exceeded 120 nSv h-1, while the average was 80 nSv h-1. Gamma-ray spectrometry of the collected river water and soil samples did not reveal any unusual radioactivity either. In other words, we have found no evidence of radioactive pollution that would endanger the health of the residents of Slavonski Brod. KEY WORDS: air quality; ambient dose rate equivalent; gamma ray spectrometry; oil refinery; radioactive pollution Slavonski Brod is a Croatian town of 65,000 residents, The aim of our study, however, was not to identify the situated on the left bank of the Sava River at the border source of the pollution or enter the debate about its social with Bosnia and Herzegovina (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Sisak , V2 Sisak - Croatia Flood - 02/04/2013 Reference Map - Detail Production Date: 11/04/2013 Austria Hungary N " Slovenia Zagreb 0 Au ' Podravska Varazdin Dr 3 !
    605000 607500 610000 612500 16°20'0"E 16°21'0"E 16°22'0"E 16°23'0"E 16°24'0"E 16°25'0"E 16°26'0"E 16°27'0"E GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-035 Product N.: 01Sisak , v2 Sisak - Croatia Flood - 02/04/2013 Reference Map - Detail Production date: 11/04/2013 Austria Hungary N " Slovenia Zagreb 0 au ' Podravska Varazdin Dr 3 !. 0 0 3 ^ ° 0 0 5 0 0 4 Varazdinska 5 5 Savinjska Hungary 4 4 Krapina zupanija N " 0 0 !. Serbia 0 5 5 ' 3 Slovenia Bosnia 3 ° Krapinsko-zagorska and 5 !( 4 S ava zupanija Herzegovina Mur Spodnjeposavska Bjelovar !. CroatiVairovitica Zagreb Adriatic Sea !.Montenegro Dolenjska ^ Italy Albania Zagrebacka Bjelovarsko-bilogorska zupanija zupanija Karlovac !. Sisak !. Pozesko-slavenska zupanija Karlovacka Croatia Pozega !. zupanija Sisacko-moslavacka zupanija Brodsko-posavska zupanija Federacija Bosnia and Republika Bosna i Srpska Hercegovina Herzegovina Cartographic Information 1:15000 Full color ISO A1, low resolution (100 dpi) 0 0,25 0,5 1 km N " 0 ' 2 3 ° Map Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 33N 5 4 Graticule: WGS 84 geographical coordinates N " ± 0 ' 2 3 ° 5 4 Legend General Information Settlements Transportation Area of Interest Commercial Railway !( Industrial Primary Road 0 0 Residential Secondary Road 0 0 Point of Interest 5 5 2 !( 2 4 4 Hydrology Local Road 0 0 4 Educational 5 5 River !( 9 Institutional !( !( N " 0 ' 1 3 ° 5 4 N " 0 ' 1 3 ° 5 4 Map Information Severe floods have stricken northern and central part of Croatia and have caused damage in !( several river basins and agricultural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Sea and River Ports – the Challenge of the Croatian Transport System for the 21St Century Integracija Morskih I Ri
    Integration Sea and River Ports – the Challenge of the Croatian Transport System for the 21st Century Integracija morskih i riječnih luka – izazov hrvatskog prometnog sustava za 21. stoljeće Maja Krčum Veljko Plazibat Gorana Jelić Mrčelić University of Split University of Split University of Split Faculty of Maritime Studies Faculty of Maritime Studies Faculty of Maritime Studies e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] DOI 10.17818/NM/2015/4.2 UDK 656.615(497.5)”20” Review / Pregledni rad Paper accepted / Rukopis primljen: 20. 7. 2015. Summary This paper discusses the indicators of development possibilities for sea ports of KEY WORDS national importance which are opened for public traffic: Rijeka, Ploče, Zadar, Split logistic networks and Dubrovnik, as well as for inland water ports: Vukovar, Osijek, Slavonski Brod and indicators of development Sisak. Development of traffic and logistic integration processes have been proposed possibilities for Croatian sea and river ports, based upon development factors analyses. Croatian development directions sea ports Rijeka, Ploče and inland water cargo ports Osijek, Vukovar, Slavonski Brod ports in the Republic of Croatia and Sisak have been analysed as delivery/forwarding points (nodes), taking into account the directions of goods flows, the participation in the traffic of goods, and all other relevant indicators. The integrated and coordinated approach to the ports and other subjects in the logistic chain redirects the traffic from roads to railways and inland waterways as energy efficient and environmentally – friendly forms of transportation, increases business rationality and optimal organisation users and transportation entities. Sažetak U ovom radu su analizirani pokazatelji razvojnih mogućnosti morskih luka koje su KLJUČNE RIJEČI otvorene za javni promet kao što su Rijeka, Ploče, Zadar, Split i Dubrovnik, te luke na unutarnjim vodama: Vukovar, Osijek, Slavonski Brod i Sisak.
    [Show full text]
  • CROATIA Dino Mujadžević 1 1 Muslim Populations the Last National
    CROATIA Dino Mujadžević 1 1 Muslim Populations The last national census from 2011 for the Republic of Croatia provides very reliable data on the number and dispersion of Muslim population and other religions, as well as ethnic groups, in this country. There are 62,977 persons in Croatia who identified themselves as Muslims, which is 1.47% of the total population of 4,284,889. This is a fairly significant increase from 54,814 persons according to 1991 census and 56,777 (1.28% of total population) according to 2001 census.2 According to administra- tive division the largest part of Muslim population resides in the city of Zagreb (18,044; 2,28%) and the following counties (županije):3 Primorsko- goranska (Rijeka; 10,667; 3.60%), Istarska (Pula; 9,965; 4.79%), Sisačko- moslavačka (Sisak; 4,140; 2.40%), Dubrovačko-neretvanska (Dubrovnik, 2,927, 2.39%), Vukovarsko-srijemska (Vukovar; 2,619; 1.46%), Karlovačka (Karlovac; 2,163; 1.68%). Muslims are largely concentrated in urban areas, most notably in the capital and the largest industrial centre Zagreb and other major towns and industrial centres in mainland Croatia: Sisak (2,442; 5.11%), Slavonski Brod (1,173; 1.98%) and Karlovac (705; 1.27%). Muslims are significantly present in ports, industrial and tourist centers of Northern Adriatic: Rijeka (5,820; 4.52%), Pula (3.275; 5.70%), Labin (1,243; 10.68%), Vodnjan (858; 14.02%), Poreč (710; 4.25%), Umag (669; 4.97%), Raša (569; 17.88%), Rovinj (507, 3.55%), Buzet (240; 3.91%) and Buje (207; 3.99%).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROMAN CITY of SISCIA Sisak CROATIA
    THE ROMAN CITY OF SISCIA Sisak CROATIA THE ROMAN CITY OF SISCIA Sisak CROATIA Document adopted by the Ministry of Culture of Croatia on 28 January 2010 Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan/Survey of the Architectural and Archaeological Heritage (IRPP/SAAH) 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................3 1. THE SITE.............................................................................................................................................4 2. THE PROPOSAL.................................................................................................................................7 3. THE OUTCOME..................................................................................................................................8 4. THE REASON .....................................................................................................................................9 5. RESPONSIBILITY ...............................................................................................................................9 6. PARTICIPATION...............................................................................................................................10 7. THE RISKS........................................................................................................................................11 8. THE COSTS......................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial (Regional) Differences of Demographic Development of the Republic of Croatia
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Nejašmić, Ivo; Njegač, Dražen Conference Paper Spatial (Regional) Differences of Demographic Development of the Republic of Croatia 41st Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "European Regional Development Issues in the New Millennium and their Impact on Economic Policy", 29 August - 1 September 2001, Zagreb, Croatia Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Nejašmić, Ivo; Njegač, Dražen (2001) : Spatial (Regional) Differences of Demographic Development of the Republic of Croatia, 41st Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "European Regional Development Issues in the New Millennium and their Impact on Economic Policy", 29 August - 1 September 2001, Zagreb, Croatia, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/115281 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT Croatia 2010
    SIGMA Support for Improvement in Governance and Management A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU ASSESSMENT Croatia 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW ............................................................................................................. 2 CIVIL SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ..................................................................................................... 5 INTEGRITY ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL ................................................................................. 11 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ................................................................................................................................. 14 POLICY-MAKING AND CO-ORDINATION ........................................................................................................ 20 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, and they do not necessarily reflect the views of the OECD and its member countries or of the beneficiary countries participating in the Sigma Programme SIGMA Assessment Croatia Democracy and the Rule of Law 2010 DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW The Government’s actions during the period under review focused on recovering
    [Show full text]
  • ACFC 2Nd State Report Croatia
    April 2004 ACFC/SR/II(2004)002 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY CROATIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 13 April 2004) ACFC/SR/II(2004)002 Table of contents: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 PART I.............................................................................................................................. 11 From the report of the Ministry of Justice ........................................................................ 11 From the report of the Office for National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 20 From the report of the Commission on Relations with Religious Communities.............. 34 From the report of the Central State Administration Bureau............................................ 38 From the report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs .......................................................... 38 From the report of the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports .................................. 38 Albanian national minority ............................................................................................... 43 PART II............................................................................................................................. 46 Answers to the Questionnaire of the Advisory
    [Show full text]