DOCSLIB.ORG

Silicon Metal from Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Silicon Metal from Russia Silicon Metal from Russia Investigation No. 731-TA-991 (Third Review) Publication 5058 May2020 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS David S. Johanson, Chairman Rhonda K. Schmidtlein Jason E. Kearns Randolph J. Stayin Amy A. Karpel Catherine DeFilippo Director, Office of Operations Staffass igned Nitin Joshi, Investigator David Gubberman, Industry Analyst PamelaDavis, Economist David Boy land, Accountant Ann-Marie Carton, Statistician Jason Miller, Attorney Douglas Corkran, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Silicon Metal from Russia Investigation No. 731-TA-991 (Third Review) Publication 5058 May2020 CONTENTS Page Determination ....................................................................................................................... 1 Views of the Commission ....................................................................................................... 3 Part I: Introduction .............................................................................................................. I-1 Background ................................................................................................................................ I-1 The original investigation ...................................................................................................... I-2 Commission Remand Proceedings ........................................................................................ I-3 The first five-year review ....................................................................................................... I-4 The second five-year review .................................................................................................. I-4 Previous and related investigations .......................................................................................... I-5 Summary data ........................................................................................................................... I-6 Statutory criteria ..................................................................................................................... I-10 Organization of report ............................................................................................................. I-12 Commerce’s reviews ............................................................................................................... I-12 Administrative reviews ........................................................................................................ I-12 Five-year reviews ................................................................................................................. I-12 The subject merchandise ........................................................................................................ I-14 Commerce’s scope .............................................................................................................. I-14 Tariff treatment ................................................................................................................... I-14 The product ............................................................................................................................. I-15 Description and applications ............................................................................................... I-15 Manufacturing processes .................................................................................................... I-18 Domestic like product issues ................................................................................................... I-22 U.S. market participants .......................................................................................................... I-23 U.S. producers ..................................................................................................................... I-23 U.S. importers ...................................................................................................................... I-26 U.S. purchasers .................................................................................................................... I-27 Apparent U.S. consumption .................................................................................................... I-28 i CONTENTS Page Part II: Conditions of competition in the U.S. market........................................................... II-1 U.S. market characteristics ....................................................................................................... II-1 Channels of distribution ........................................................................................................... II-1 Geographic distribution ........................................................................................................... II-3 Supply and demand considerations ......................................................................................... II-4 U.S. supply ............................................................................................................................ II-4 U.S. demand ......................................................................................................................... II-6 Impact of 232 tariffs ............................................................................................................... II-10 Substitutability issues ............................................................................................................. II-10 Lead times .......................................................................................................................... II-10 Knowledge of country sources ........................................................................................... II-11 Factors affecting purchasing decisions............................................................................... II-12 Comparisons of domestic products, subject imports, and imports from other countries II-15 Comparison of U.S.-produced and imported silicon metal ................................................ II-16 Elasticity estimates ................................................................................................................. II-18 U.S. supply elasticity ........................................................................................................... II-19 U.S. demand elasticity ........................................................................................................ II-19 Substitution elasticity ......................................................................................................... II-19 Part III: Condition of the U.S. industry ................................................................................ III-1 Overview.................................................................................................................................. III-1 Changes experienced by the industry ................................................................................. III-5 Anticipated changes in operations ...................................................................................... III-7 U.S. production, capacity, and capacity utilization ................................................................. III-7 Constraints on capacity ..................................................................................................... III-11 U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments and exports ......................................................................... III-11 ii CONTENTS Page Part III: Condition of the U.S. industry ...................................................................... Continued U.S. producers’ inventories ................................................................................................... III-14 U.S. producers’ imports and purchases ................................................................................ III-15 U.S. employment, wages, and productivity .......................................................................... III-17 Financial experience of U.S. producers ................................................................................. III-18 Background ........................................................................................................................ III-18 Operations on silicon metal............................................................................................... III-18 Capital expenditures and research and development expenses ...................................... III-37 Assets and return on assets ............................................................................................... III-38 Part IV: U.S. imports and the foreign industries .................................................................. IV-1 U.S. imports ............................................................................................................................. IV-1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. IV-1 Imports from subject and nonsubject countries ................................................................. IV-1 U.S. importers’ imports subsequent to September 30, 2019 ................................................. IV-6
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals After the Crisis: Results of 2011
    Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals after the Crisis: Results of 2011 Report dated April 16, 2013 Moscow and New York, April 16, 2013 The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their third survey of Russian multinationals today.1 The survey, conducted from November 2012 to February 2013, is part of a long-term study of the global expansion of emerging market non-financial multinational enterprises (MNEs).2 The present report covers the period 2009-2011. Highlights Russia is one of the leading emerging markets in terms of outward foreign direct investments (FDI). Such a position is supported not by several multinational giants but by dozens of Russian MNEs in various industries. Foreign assets of the top 20 Russian non-financial MNEs grew every year covered by this report and reached US$ 111 billion at the end of 2011 (Table 1). Large Russian exporters usually use FDI in support of their foreign activities. As a result, oil and gas and steel companies with considerable exports are among the leading Russian MNEs. However, representatives of other industries also have significant foreign assets. Many companies remained “regional” MNEs. As a result, more than 66% of the ranked companies’ foreign assets were in Europe and Central Asia, with 28% in former republics of the Soviet Union (Annex table 2). Due to the popularity of off-shore jurisdictions to Russian MNEs, some Caribbean islands and Cyprus attracted many Russian subsidiaries with low levels of foreign assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release (PDF)
    MECHEL REPORTS THE FY2020 FINANCIAL RESULTS Consolidated revenue – 265.5 bln rubles (-8% compared to FY 2019) EBITDA* – 41.1 bln rubles (-23% compared to FY 2019) Profit attributable to equity shareholders of Mechel PAO – 808 mln rubles Moscow, Russia – March 11, 2021 – Mechel PAO (MOEX: MTLR, NYSE: MTL), a leading Russian mining and steel group, announces financial results for the FY 2020. Mechel PAO’s Chief Executive Officer Oleg Korzhov commented: “The Group’s consolidated revenue in 2020 totaled 265.5 billion rubles, which is 8% less compared to 2019. EBITDA amounted to 41.1 billion rubles, which is 23% less year-on-year. “The mining division accounted for about 60% of the decrease in revenue. This was due to a significant decrease in coal prices year-on-year. In conditions of coronavirus limitations, many steelmakers around the world cut down on production, which could not fail to affect the demand for metallurgical coals and their price accordingly. By the year’s end the market demonstrated signs of a recovery, but due to China’s restrictions on Australian coal imports, coal prices outside on China remained low under this pressure. High prices in China have supported our mining division’s revenue to a certain extent. In 4Q2020 we increased shipments to China as best we could considering our long-term contractual obligations to partners from other countries. These circumstances became in many ways the reason for a decrease in our consolidated EBITDA. In Mechel’s other divisions EBITDA dynamics were positive year-on-year. “The decrease in the steel division’s revenue was also due to the coronavirus pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Yakutia) “…The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Is the Largest Region in the Russian Federation and One of the Richest in Natural Resources
    Investor's Guide to the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) “…The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) is the largest region in the Russian Federation and one of the richest in natural resources. Needless to say, the stable and dynamic development of Yakutia is of key importance to both the Far Eastern Federal District and all of Russia…” President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin “One of the fundamental priorities of the Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) is to develop comfortable conditions for business and investment activities to ensure dynamic economic growth” Head of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Egor Borisov 2 Contents Welcome from Egor Borisov, Head of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 5 Overview of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 6 Interesting facts about the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 7 Strategic priorities of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) investment policy 8 Seven reasons to start a business in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 10 1. Rich reserves of natural resources 10 2. Significant business development potential for the extraction and processing of mineral and fossil resources 12 3. Unique geographical location 15 4. Stable credit rating 16 5. Convenient conditions for investment activity 18 6. Developed infrastructure for the support of small and medium-sized enterprises 19 7. High level of social and economic development 20 Investment infrastructure 22 Interaction with large businesses 24 Interaction with small and medium-sized enterprises 25 Other organisations and institutions 26 Practical information on doing business in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 27 Public-Private Partnership 29 Information for small and medium-sized enterprises 31 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Holborn Gate Master Fax Template
    **CONFERENCE CALL** MECHEL OAO (NYSE:MTL) Scheduled for: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:00 AM New York Time 3:00 PM London Time 6:00 PM Moscow Time __________________________________________________________________ You are cordially invited to participate on a conference call with the management of Mechel OAO to discuss our 2008 first half and nine months results. Igor Zyuzin, Chief Executive Officer, will host the call. Please call the number below approximately 10 minutes prior to the scheduled time of the call, quoting Mechel, and the chairperson’s name, Alexander Tolkach. Conference Call Phone Numbers: US: +1 718 354 1158 International: +44 20 7138 0810 Confirmation Code: 8468348 The earnings release will be distributed prior to the conference call. In addition, the conference call will be available live via the Internet. To access the call and associated slides, please visit our website at: http://www.mechel.com/investors/fresults/index.wbp on the day of the call. A replay of the call will be available until 11:59PM New York time on December 24th. To access, please dial, US: +1 718 354 1112; UK: +44 20 7806 1970. From both areas, enter: 8468348# to access. MECHEL 2008 FIRST HALF AND NINE MONTHS RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL TO BE BROADCAST OVER THE INTERNET Moscow, Russia — December 15, 2008 — Mechel OAO (NYSE: MTL) announces that it intends to release its results for the first half ending June 30, 2008, and the nine months ending on September 30, 2008 on Thursday, December 18, 2008. In conjunction with this release, Mechel will host a conference call, which will be simultaneously broadcast live over the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – the Competition for Customers
    Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – The Competition for Customers James Henderson NG 73 January 2013 The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, of any of the Institute’s members, and/or of the author’s other affiliations. Copyright © 2013 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-66-4 ii Abbreviations and Units of Measurement bbls Barrels bcm Billion cubic metres bcma Billion cubic metres per annum bn bbls Billion barrels boepd Barrels of oil equivalent per day bpd Barrels per day E&P Exploration and Production ESPO East Siberia – Pacific Ocean (Pipeline) FSU Former Soviet Union IOC International Oil Company kboepd Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day kbpd Thousands of barrels per day km Kilometres mm bbls Million barrels mcm Thousands of cubic metres mmboepd Millions of barrels of oil equivalent per day] mmbpd Millions of barrels per day mmbtu Million British thermal units mmcm Millions of cubic metres mmt Millions of tonnes mmtpa Millions of tonnes per annum Mm tonnes Millions of tonnes P&P Proved and Probable tcm
    [Show full text]
  • US Sanctions on Russia
    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment from Russia Stabilizes After the Global Crisis 1
    Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of Russian Academy of Sciences Investment from Russia stabilizes after the global crisis 1 Report dated June 23, 2011 EMBARGO: The contents of this report must not be quoted or summarized in the print, broadcast or electronic media before June 23, 2011, 3:00 p.m. Moscow; 11 a.m. GMT; and 7 a.m. New York. Moscow and New York, June 23, 2011 : The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint undertaking of the Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their second joint survey of Russian outward investors today 2. The survey is part of a long-term study of the rapid global expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging markets. The present survey, conducted at the beginning of 2011, covers the period 2007-2009. Highlights Despite the global crisis of the last few years, Russia has remained one of the leading outward investors in the world. The foreign assets of Russian MNEs have grown rapidly and only China and Mexico are further ahead among emerging markets. As the results of our survey show, several non- financial 3 Russian MNEs are significant actors in the world economy. The foreign assets of the 20 leading non-financial MNEs were about USD 107 billion at the end of 2009 (table 1). Their foreign sales 4 were USD 198 billion and they had more than 200,000 employees abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Russia's Structural Leaders
    June 7, 2011 GS SUSTAIN Equity Research Identifying Russia’s structural leaders Identifying long-term winners with SUSTAIN Russia Structural Leaders List We have applied the GS SUSTAIN framework to We have identified eight companies that have RUSSIA STRUCTURAL LEADERS 75 companies across our Russian coverage to delivered and in our view will continue to deliver y identify those well positioned to deliver long-term industry leading cash returns: Mechel, EDCL, Company Sector quality quartile position quartile Management CROCI CROCI average 2011- % 13E, CROCI change 2006-10, % quartile CROCI outperformance through sustained high cash Alliance Oil, Rosneft and Novatek in the natural Novatek Energy 32.1% 0.3% 1 1 1 Oil Serv & Pipe Eurasia Drilling Co 28.2% -2.1% 2 1 1 returns. The framework combines forecast cash resources space and Magnit, Cherkizovo and M- producers Mechel Steel 21.9% -0.6% 2 1 1 returns with objective measures of industry Video in the consumer segment. Investing in this Alliance Oil CompaEnergy 17.4% 0.8% 2 1 1 Magnit (GDR) Consumer 17.1% -0.2% 2 1 1 positioning and management quality, which in a list of companies would have generated over Cherkizovo Group Consumer 16.1% 1.2% 2 1 2 M-VIDEO Consumer 15.0% 1.4% 2 1 2 Russian context focus predominantly on 300% outperformance vs. the MSCI Russia since Rosneft Energy 13.9% 1.0% 2 1 2 ownership and corporate governance issues. January 2006. RUSSIA STRUCTURAL LEADERS WATCH LIST Russia at the intersection of global structural Russia Structural Leaders Watch List Company Sector dust y CROCI average 2011-13E, % CROCI change 2006-10, % quartile CROCI position quartile Management quality quartile trends Disclosure remains sub par in many Russian Uralkali Mining 38.3% 2.4% 1 1 3 Globaltrans Transport 20.3% 2.3% 1 1 3 Oil Serv & Pipe Russia’s economy and equity market are corporates and is the main reason why a number ChelPipe 18.0% -1.3% 2 1 3 producers undergoing a dramatic transformation through of companies that are forecast to generate Mail.ru Group Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Pace Through the Race
    annual REPORT 2018 PACE THROUGH THE RACE RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT ANNUAL RUSAL CONTENTS FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 CORPORATE PROFILE 5 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 11 CEO’S REVIEW 14 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 17 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 41 PROFILES OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT 81 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 99 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 177 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 197 GLOSSARY 343 APPENDIX A 355 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company APPENDIX B 359 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement among Major Shareholders only CORPORATE INFORMATION 366 1 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 USD million (unless otherwise specified) 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Revenue 10,280 9,969 7,983 8,680 9,357 Adjusted EBITDA 2,163 2,120 1,489 2,015 1,514 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% 23.2% 16.2% EBIT 1,481 1,523 1,068 1,409 942 Share of Profits from Associates and joint ventures 955 620 848 368 536 Pre Tax Profit 1,953 1,288 1,354 763 147 Profit/(Loss) 1,698 1,222 1,179 558 (91) Profit/(Loss) Margin 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% 6.4% (1.0%) Adjusted Net Profit 856 1,077 292 671 17 Adjusted Net Profit Margin 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% 7.7% 0.2% Recurring Net Profit 1,695 1,573 959 1,097 486 Basic Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (in USD) 0.112 0.080 0.078 0.037 (0.006) Total Assets 15,777 15,774 14,452 12,809 14,857 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company 5,209 4,444 3,299 1,391 2,237 Net Debt 7,442 7,648 8,421 8,372 8,837 3 Reduced weight Manoeuvring and speedy CORPORATE 01 PROFILE Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CORPORATE PROFILE RUSAL is a low-cost, vertically integrated aluminium producer with core smelting operations located in Siberia, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Market News Politics Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody September 24, 2020 Issue No. 2020/37 Market News Moscow Exchange to restart trade in RUSAL’s shares on September 28, 2020 On September 22, 2020 a spokesperson for the Moscow Exchange stated that the bourse suspended trade in shares of Russian aluminum giant UC RUSAL on September 22 and would restart it on September 28 after the company finishes the registration in the country. The suspension is connected to re-registration of the company from the Jersey Island into Russia. RUSAL said in a statement that the central bank had already registered the issue and a prospectus of securities under the re-registration process, and the company expects to obtain registration as an international company with the Federal Tax Service on Friday. In April 2018, the U.S. imposed sanctions against 38 Russian tycoons, officials and companies, including Oleg Deripaska and his companies – En+ Group, carmaker GAZ Group, holding Basic Element, and RUSAL – among others. In December, the shareholders of En+ Group unilaterally voted for reregistration of the business in Russia and for Deripaska’s ownership reduction below 50% and an end to his influence on the board of directors. RUSAL and En+ Group were decided to be reregistered in a special administrative zone in Kaliningrad. Moscow Exchange to suspend trading in Mostotrest shares from September 24, 2020 On September 23, 2020 it was announced that the Moscow Exchange would suspend trading in the shares of construction company Mostotrest from September 24 due to reorganization of the company. Ruble falls 82.35 kopecks to RUB 77.18 per US dollar On September 24, 2020 it was reported that the weighted average rate of the Russian ruble with tomorrow settlement fell by 82.35 kopecks against the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Corporate Governance in Russia
    Centre for Economic and Financial Research at New Economic School June 2007 A Survey of Corporate Governance in Russia Olga Lazareva Andrei Rachinsky Sergey Stepanov Working Paper No 103 CEFIR / NES Working Paper series A Survey of Corporate Governance in Russia Olga Lazareva, Andrei Rachinsky, and Sergey Stepanov* June 2007 Abstract In this survey, we describe the current state of corporate governance in Russia and discuss its dynamics and prospects. We review the main mechanisms of corporate governance in the country and relate them to firms’ ownership structures, financial market development and government influence. Finally, we discuss the current trends in Russian corporate governance and its prospects. Keywords: corporate governance, ownership, expropriation, predatory state, property rights JEL Classifications: G32, G34, G38 * Olga Lazareva: Centre for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) and Stockholm School of Economics, [email protected]; Andrei Rachinsky: CEFIR, [email protected]; Sergey Stepanov: New Economic School and CEFIR, [email protected] We thank Sergei Guriev for very valuable comments 1. Introduction In this survey we describe the current state of corporate governance in Russia and discuss its dynamics and prospects. Corporate governance has become an important topic in Russia once again, and there is a clear trend among the largest Russian companies to adhere to good corporate governance standards by increasing disclosure, complying with international accounting standards, placing “independent directors” on boards, and adopting corporate governance codes, for example. There have also been initiatives to improve corporate governance from the government, regulators and various private agencies. The government is adopting new laws and amendments to the existing laws.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest
    An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: • “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail • The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board • Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee • Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies”, while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample • The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors • Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the development of digital technologies continues • The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit • Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent • The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times • Twenty-four percent of companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]