DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions Initial Environmental Examination March 2009 People’s Republic of China: Hunan Flood Management Sector Project (Xiangtan City Non-core Subproject) Prepared by Hunan Hydro and Power Design Institute for the Hunan Provincial Project Management Office and the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT SECTOR PROJECT XIANGTAN CITY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF CHINA HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT SECTOR PROJECT XIANGTAN CITY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) MARCH 2009 Hunan Hydro and Power Design Institute HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT SECTOR PROJECT XIANGTAN CITY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBPROJECT ......................................................... 1 1.1. TYPE, RATIONALE AND PURPOSE ........................................................................................ 1 1.2. SUBPROJECT OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3. LOCATION ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. SCHEME ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.1. DIKE WORKS ............................................................................................................... 7 1.4.2. DRAINAGE WORKS ................................................................................................... 10 1.4.3. ELECTRIC DRAINAGE STATION .............................................................................. 10 1.4.4. BORROW PITS AND SPOIL PILES ........................................................................... 13 1.4.5. BUDGET ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.4.6. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................................................ 13 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................ 14 2.1. PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1. TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 14 2.1.2. GEOLOGY AND SEISMOLOGY ................................................................................. 14 2.1.3. CLIMATE ..................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.4. SURFACE WATER ..................................................................................................... 15 2.1.5. AIR QUALITY .............................................................................................................. 18 2.2. ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................. 18 2.2.1. VEGETATION ............................................................................................................. 18 2.2.2. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC WILDLIFE ................................................................. 19 2.2.3. FISHERIES ................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.4. PROTECTED AREAS AND NATURE RESERVES .................................................... 19 2.3. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 20 2.3.1. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ........................................................................................ 20 2.3.2. ECONOMIC PROFILE ................................................................................................ 20 2.3.3. MINORITY PROFILE .................................................................................................. 21 2.3.4. ARCHAEOLOGY, CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL PROFILE ............................... 22 3. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION ................................ 23 3.1. APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING ................................................................ 23 3.2. SITING .................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.1. LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ............................................................ 23 3.2.2. AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ................................................................................. 35 3.2.3. ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................... 36 3.2.4. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL VALUES .................................................................... 36 3.2.5. TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................... 37 3.2.6. MINERAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................ 37 3.2.7. PUBLIC FACILITIES ................................................................................................... 37 3.3. CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.1. HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................. 38 3.3.2. WATER QUALITY ....................................................................................................... 38 3.3.3. SOLID WASTE ........................................................................................................... 39 3.3.4. AIR QUALITY .............................................................................................................. 40 3.3.5. NOISE ......................................................................................................................... 41 3.3.6. FLORA ........................................................................................................................ 42 3.3.7. FAUNA ........................................................................................................................ 42 3.3.8. AQUATIC LIFE ............................................................................................................ 43 3.3.9. PUBLIC SAFETY ........................................................................................................ 43 3.4. OPERATION ........................................................................................................................... 44 HUNAN HYDRO AND POWER DESIGN INSTITUTE MARCH 2009 PAGE I HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT SECTOR PROJECT XIANGTAN CITY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) 3.4.1. HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................. 44 3.4.2. WATER QUALITY ....................................................................................................... 45 3.4.3. FLORA AND FAUNA ................................................................................................... 45 3.4.4. AIR QUALITY .............................................................................................................. 46 3.4.5. TRAFFIC ..................................................................................................................... 46 3.4.6. PUBLIC SAFETY ........................................................................................................ 46 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION .......................................................................... 47 4.1. BENEFICIARY IDENTIFICATION ........................................................................................... 47 4.2. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACTIVITIES ........................ 47 5. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ..................................................... 55 5.1. EMP PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 55 5.2. EMP DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................ 55 5.3. IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATIONS ................................................................................... 56 5.4. SUPERVISION ........................................................................................................................ 56 5.4.1. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ............................................................................. 58 5.4.2. CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND POLLUTANTS DISCHARGE ... 59 5.5. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................ 64 5.6. CAPACITY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 69 5.7. BUDGET FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impact Analysis in This Report
    Environmental Impacts Assessment Report on Project Construction Project name: European Investment Bank Loan Hunan Camellia Oil Development Project Construction entity (Seal): Foreign Fund Project Administration Office of Forestry Department of Hunan Province Date of preparation: July 1st, 2012 Printed by State Environmental Protection Administration of China Notes for Preparation of Environmental Impacts Assessment Report on Project Construction An Environmental Impacts Assessment (EIA) Report shall be prepared by an entity qualified for conducting the work of environmental impacts assessment. 1. Project title shall refer to the name applied by the project at the time when it is established and approved, which shall in no case exceed 30 characters (and every two English semantic shall be deemed as one Chinese character) 2. Place of Construction shall refer to the detailed address of project location, and where a highway or railway is involved, names of start station and end station shall be provided. 3. Industry category shall be stated according to the Chinese national standards. 4. Total Investment Volume shall refer to the investment volume in total of the project. 5. Principal Targets for Environment Protection shall refer to centralized residential quarters, schools, hospitals, protected culture relics, scenery areas, water sources and ecological sensitive areas within certain radius of the project area, for which the objective, nature, size and distance from project boundary shall be set out as practical as possible. 6. Conclusion and suggestions shall include analysis results for clean production, up-to-standard discharge and total volume control of the project; a determination on effectiveness of pollution control measures; an explanation on environmental impacts by the project, and a clear-cut conclusion on feasibility of the construction project.
    [Show full text]
  • 1702 45474574.Pdf
    Xu et al.: Comprehensive assessment of the water ecological security of the Xiangjiang River Basin based on physico-chemistry and organism indices - 4547 - COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE WATER ECOLOGICAL SECURITY OF THE XIANGJIANG RIVER BASIN BASED ON PHYSICO-CHEMISTRY AND ORGANISM INDICES XU, X.1* – SHENG, D.1 – LI, G.1 – CHEN, X.2 – WANG, X.3 – XIAO, C.3 – GAO, X.4,5 – HU, C.1 1Hunan Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Changsha, Hunan 410007, China 2Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Control, Ministry of Education Hunan University, Changsha 410007, China 3College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China 4Hunan Provincial Academy of Science and Technology Consulting Co., Ltd. Changsha 410004, China 5Hunan Academy of Environmental Protection Science, Changsha 410004, China *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 19th Oct 2018; accepted 28th Jan 2019) Abstract. The water ecological security of a river basin affects the vigorous growth of the regional economy and the healthy development of the ecological environment. Based on river physics, chemistry, and biological indicators, this study constructed a comprehensive assessment index system for the water ecological security of the Xiangjiang River Basin in China. The system consisted of 6 elements, and 18 indicators. This study used the analytic hierarchical process (AHP) to evaluate the water ecological security of the upstream, midstream, and downstream environments of the Xiangjiang River Basin. The results show that the overall ecological security of the upper and midstream portions of the Xiangjiang River Basin is relatively good, while the downstream section is at a general level.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Dissolved Trace
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Spatial Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Dissolved Trace Elements in Groundwater in southern China Congke Gu1,2, Yan Zhang3, Yu Peng1,2, Peifang Leng1,2, Nong Zhu1, Yunfeng Qiao1,2, Zhao Li1,2 & Fadong Li1,2 ✉ To understand the groundwater environmental quality and the impact of trace elements in the construction of urban agglomeration in China, this study collected 58 groundwater samples from the core area of the Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration (Changsha, Zhuzhou, Xiangtan) and quantitatively analyzed the content of 13 dissolved trace element and their spatial distribution characteristics. The health risk assessment model was further used to evaluate the human health risk caused by trace element pollution in groundwater. It was observed that Ba had the highest average concentration (0.28 mg·L−1), whereas Cd had the lowest (2.1 × 10−5 mg·L−1). Compared with China’s groundwater environmental quality standard, the exceeding rates of Se, Mn, Zn, and Ni concentrations were 37.93%, 17.24%, 1.72% and 1.72%, respectively. Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mo, and Pb did not exceed the corresponding standards. The 13 trace elements were distributed in a scattered pattern in space and the trace elements in both banks of the Xiang River, Zhuzhou, Weishui River and surrounding areas were relatively high. Health risk assessments showed that the carcinogenic risk values of Cd, Cr, and Pb and the health risk values of 10 non-carcinogenic elements were less than the corresponding maximum acceptable risk level. The health risks associated with non-carcinogenic substances through ingestion were higher than those associated with dermal absorption.
    [Show full text]
  • RP211 Volume 1 Public Disclosure Authorized
    RP211 Volume 1 Public Disclosure Authorized Hunan Urban Development Project Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Public Disclosure Authorized March 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Mott MacDonald Demeter House Station Road Cambridge GB 1 2RS Tel 01223 463500 Public Disclosure Authorized Fax -~~~~~FF01223 461007 'p k_ Hunan Urban Mott MacDonald Development Project Hunan Provincial Development and Planning Commission Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description B 29 Feb '04 ML HCL CAP Second Version This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mot MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document the being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting therefron. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. ComoldaedRedemlen AcbonPlan 206033AYCAM4acb2004 Hunan Urban Mott MacDonald Development Project Hunan Provincial Development and Planning Commission List of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Background ............................................... 1-1 1.2 Descriptions of the Project ............................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Budget Implementationand Schedule ................................................ 1-13 1.4 Socio-economic Benefits ................................................ 1-13 1.5 Scope of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Surface Water Quality Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques in Red Soil Hilly Region: a Case Study of Xiangjiang Watershed, China
    Environ Monit Assess (2009) 152:123–131 DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0301-y Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques in red soil hilly region: a case study of Xiangjiang watershed, China Qi Zhang & Zhongwu Li & Guangming Zeng & Jianbing Li & Yong Fang & Qingshui Yuan & Yamei Wang & Fangyi Ye Received: 16 December 2007 /Accepted: 9 April 2008 /Published online: 6 June 2008 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract In the study, multivariate statistical meth- related to dissolve heavy metals. Thus, these methods ods including factor, principal component and cluster are believed to be valuable to help water resources analysis were applied to analyze surface water quality managers understand complex nature of water quality data sets obtained from Xiangjiang watershed, and issues and determine the priorities to improve water generated during 7 years (1994–2000) monitoring of quality. 12 parameters at 34 different profiles. Hierarchical cluster analysis grouped 34 sampling sites into three Keywords Water quality management . Principle clusters, including relatively less polluted (LP), component analysis . Cluster analysis . Xiangjiang medium polluted (MP) and highly polluted (HP) watershed . Red soil hilly region sites, and based on the similarity of water quality characteristics, the watershed was divided into three zones. Factor analysis/principal component analysis, Introduction applied to analyze the data sets of the three different groups obtained from cluster analysis, resulted in four The water environment quality issue is a subject of latent factors accounting for 71.62%, 71.77% and ongoing concerned with the development of economy 72.01% of the total variance in water quality data sets in any country.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrations, Distribution, and Pollution Assessment of Metals in River Sediments in China
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Concentrations, Distribution, and Pollution Assessment of Metals in River Sediments in China Guoqi Lian 1,2,3,4,* and Xinqing Lee 1 1 The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 School of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553004, China 4 Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Utilization, Liupanshui 553004, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This study conducted a review on the concentrations, spatial distribution and pollution assessment of metals including As, Hg, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in 102 river sediments in China between January 2008 and July 2020 based on the online literature. The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and potential ecological risk index (RI) were used for the pollution assessment of the metals. The results showed that the ranges of metals were: 0.44 to 250.73 mg/kg for As, 0.02 to 8.67 mg/kg for Hg, 0.06 to 40 mg/kg for Cd, 0.81 to 251.58 mg/kg for Co, 4.69 to 460 mg/kg for Cr, 2.13 to 520.42 mg/kg for Cu, 39.76 to 1884 mg/kg for Mn, 1.91 to 203.11 mg/kg for Ni, 1.44 to 1434.25 mg/kg for Pb and 12.76 to 1737.35 mg/kg for Zn, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report on Loudiinvestment Environment 2018
    Pearl of Central Hunan Loudi Evaluation Report on LoudiInvestment Environment 2018 KPMG Advisory (China) Limited May 2018 © 2017 毕马威会计师事务所 — 香港合伙制事务所，是与瑞士实体 — 毕马威国际合作组织 (“毕马威国际”)�相关联的独立成员所网络中的成员。版权所有， 不得转载。香港印刷。 0 © 2018 KPMG Advisory (China) Limited, a wholly foreign owned enterprise in China and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG騳报告所载资料是为 International Cooperative[客户名称和报告目的 ("KPMG International"),]编撰。任何其他人士不得依赖本报告作任何其他用途，本所概不就此对任何其他人士承担任何责任。未 a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in China. 经本所书面同意，任何人士不得披露、引用或引述本报告的全部或部分内容。 1 Contents 01 Profile Pearl of Central Hunan——Loudi § City profile Investment advantage § City brand 02 of Loudi § Macro economy § City facilities 03 Main development carriers 04 Voice of investors 05 List of key investment information © 2018 KPMG Advisory (China) Limited, a wholly foreign owned enterprise in China and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in China. 01 Basic profile City profile n Location: Loudi is located in the geometric center of Hunan, across east longitude 110°45′40″～112°31′07″, north latitude 27°12′31″～28°14′27″, connecting Yiyang and Changde in the north, Shaoyang and Hengyang in the south, adjacent Huaihua and western Hunan in the west, and Changsha and Xiangtan in the east. n Area: East-West length is 160 kilometers, North-South length is 102 kilometers, and the total area is 8117.6 square kilometers. n Population: 4,531,700(end of 2016). n Jurisdiction: Loudi City has jurisdiction over 1 municipal district: Louxing District; 4 counties and cities: Shuangfeng County, Xinhua County, Lengshuijiang City and Lianyuan City; it also sets up the national Loudi Economic and Technological Development Zone and the "Two Type" social construction demonstration area Wanbao New Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination People's Republic of China
    Initial Environmental Examination July 2005 People’s Republic of China: Hunan Flood Management Sector Project (Loudi City Core Subproject) Prepared by SOGREAH Consultants for the Hunan Provincial Project Management Office and the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK HUNAN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT PROJECT TA 4324-PRC LOUDI CITY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) JULY 2005 13401501.R4 (E3) ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK - T.A. NO. 4324-PRC HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT PROJECT R4 (E3): LOUDI CITY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. BACKGROUND CONTEXT AND REPORT OBJECTIVES 1 1.2. HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT PROJECT - OVERVIEW 2 1.3. LOUDI URBAN FLOOD CONTROL CORE SUBPROJECT 3 1.3.1. OVERVIEW 3 1.3.2. SUBPROJECT PROPONENT 5 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 7 2.1. PRC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS 7 2.1.1. KEY LAWS, GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES 7 2.1.2. PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS UNDER PRC REGULATIONS 8 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunan Flood Control Project
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 37641 July 2005 People’s Republic of China: Hunan Flood Control Project {(Financed by the <source of funding>)} Prepared by SOGREAH Consultants For {Executing agency} {Implementing agency} This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK HUNAN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT PROJECT TA 4324-PRC FINAL REPORT JULY 2005 13401501.R4 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK - T.A. NO. 4324-PRC HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT PROJECT R4: FINAL REPORT PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA HUNAN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT – ADB LOANS PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK HUNAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT PROJECT TA 4324-PRC FINAL REPORT IDENTIFICATION N°: 13401501.R4 TH UNE DATE: 30 J 2005 This document has been produced by the SOGREAH Consultants as part of the ADB Project Preparation TA 4324-PRC (Job Number 13401501) This document has been prepared by the project team under the supervision of the Project Director following Quality Assurance Procedures of SOGREAH in compliance with ISO9001. APPROVED BY INDEX DATE AUTHOR CHECKED BY PURPOSE OF MODIFICATION (PROJECT MANAGER) A Final 30/6/05 ABH DC INDEX CONTACT ADDRESS DISTRIBUTION LIST PWRD-FLPMO (Mdm Li Kuangyun, Mr Zhu [email protected] ; [email protected]; 1 Jianrong, Mr Shen Honghui) [email protected] The Asian Development Bank (Ms Kay 3 [email protected] Cheong) [email protected], 4 SOGREAH (Head Office) SOGREAH – JULY 2005 PAGE I ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK - T.A.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    WB Loans Hunan Integrated Economic Public Disclosure Authorized Development of Small Towns Project Yueshan Waste Water Treatment Plan Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Public Disclosure Authorized Consigned by: WB Loan Project Management Office of Hunan Provincial Development and Reform Commission Compiled by: Changsha Environmental Protection Career Technical College December, 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents 1 GENERAL ....................................................................................................5 1.1 General Background of the Project ................................................................................. 5 1.1.1 Origin of the Project ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Significance of the Project Construction....................................................................... 6 1.1.3 Target of the Project...................................................................................................... 7 1.1.4 Contribution of the WB.................................................................................................. 7 1.1.5 Organizational Structure of the Project......................................................................... 8 1.2 Overview of EIA Report..................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1 Purpose of Assessment ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hunan Xiangjiang Inland Waterway Project
    Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 43031 July 2011 People’s Republic of China: Hunan Xiangjiang Inland Waterway Project Prepared by the Hunan Xiangjiang Navigation Construction & Development Co., Ltd. The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the "Terms of Use" section of this website. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of October 2010) Currency Unit = RMB 100 RMB = $14.71 $100 = 680 RMB In this report, the rate used is the rate prevailing at the above date. ABBREVIATIONS ADB — Asian Development Bank AP — Affected person As — Arsenic BOD — Biochemical oxygen demand Cd — Cadmium CEMP — Construction environmental management plan CO2 — Carbon dioxide COD — Chemical oxygen demand Cr6+ — Hexavalent chromium Cu — Copper EA — Executing Agency EIA — Environmental impact assessment EIRR — Economic Internal Rate of Return EMP — Environmental Management Plan EnvSE — Environmental Supervising Engineer FYP — Five year plan GDP — gross domestic product GRM — Grievance redress mechanism Hg — mercury HGV — heavy goods vehicle HPDOT — Hunan Province Department of Transport HPEPB — Hunan Province Environmental Protection Bureau IA — Implementing Agency IEE — Initial Environmental Examination masl — metres above sea level MEP — Ministry of Environmental Protection Mn — Manganese MOT — Ministry of Transport na — not available NGO — Non-Governmental Organization
    [Show full text]