DOCSLIB.ORG

Epsom and Ewell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epsom and Ewell Epsom and Ewell Census 2001 and Access to Services Focus on Rural Areas Epsom and Ewell is in the South East Government Office Region 1 Map of the Government Office Region showing Authority boundaries and shaded by Output Area according to the urban / rural definition. - 2 - Population In Epsom and Ewell 3.8% of people live in rural areas, compared with 22.4% in the Government Office Region. Within the rural areas all people live in less sparse areas Epsom and Ewell South East Male Female Total Male Female Total Urban 31,170 33,323 64,493 3,025,510 3,180,658 6,206,168 Rural 1,257 1,309 2,566 879,645 914,832 1,794,477 Less Sparse 1,257 1,309 2,566 878,911 914,059 1,792,970 Town 587 636 1,223 373,428 398,650 772,078 Village 670 673 1,343 338,028 346,602 684,630 Dispersed - - - 167,455 168,807 336,262 Sparse - - - 734 773 1,507 Town - - - 137 146 283 Village - - - 597 627 1,224 Dispersed - - - - - - Total 32,427 34,632 67,059 3,905,155 4,095,490 8,000,645 Percentage rural 3.9 3.8 3.8 22.5 22.3 22.4 Source table from the Census: UV03 Gender Proportion of the population of the Authority living in rural towns, villages and dispersed areas compared with the Government Office Region and England. Epsom and Ewell South East England Dispersed Village Rural type Town 0 102030405060 Percentage Source table from the Census: UV03 Gender 3 Age In Epsom and Ewell 0.5% of the population live in rural areas and are under 10 years old. 1% of the Authority's population live in rural areas and are under 19 years of age. 0.4% are aged 70 or over and live in rural areas. Total population within the Authority, broken down by age. Total Totals Rural breakdown Towns Villages Dispersed Age % Rural Urban Rural Less Less Less Sparse Sparse Sparse sparse sparse sparse Under 10 7,987 7,630 357 176 - 181 - - - 4.5 10 to 19 7,931 7,647 284 122 - 162 - - - 3.6 20 to 29 7,134 6,919 215 114 - 101 - - - 3.0 30 to 39 10,429 9,978 451 232 - 219 - - - 4.3 40 to 49 9,463 9,081 382 156 - 226 - - - 4.0 50 to 59 9,516 9,109 407 178 - 229 - - - 4.3 60 to 69 6,217 5,998 219 105 - 114 - - - 3.5 70 to 79 5,016 4,822 194 105 - 89 - - - 3.9 80 to 89 2,797 2,712 85 40 - 45 - - - 3.0 90 and over 581 569 12 12 - - - - - 2.1 67,071 64,465 2,606 1,240 - 1,366 - - - 3.9 Source table from the Census: UV04 Age Age of the population in urban/rural parts of the Authority and totals for the Government Office Region. 1400 140000 130000 1200 120000 110000 1000 100000 90000 800 80000 70000 600 60000 Authority 50000 400 40000 30000 Number of people in the 200 20000 10000 Number of people in the GOR 0 0 Under 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 Age and over Rural Epsom and Ewell Urban Epsom and Ewell South East Source table from the Census: UV04 Age 4 Proportion of children under 5 split by the urban rural definition, for the Authority and the Government Office Region Authority: Government Office Region: Epsom and Ewell South East Number of under 5's: 4,000 Number of under 5's: 472,500 Urban Less Sparse Rural Town Less Sparse Rural Village Less Sparse Rural Dispersed Sparse Rural Town Sparse Rural Village Sparse Rural Dispersed Source table from the Census: UV04 Age 5 Marital Status The ‘Marital Status’ table (UV07) classifies all people (i.e. from babies upwards) according to their marital status. To create the following table it has been assumed that all people aged under 16 would be in the “single – never married” category. All people under 16 years of age have been deducted from the original “single – never married” figures on the marital status to estimated figures on the marital status of people aged 16 or over. Estimated number of people in the Authority and Government Office Region aged 16 or over, by marital status Single Married (first Re-married Separated Divorced Widowed (never marriage) (but still legally married) married) Epsom and Ewell Urban 14,650 25,491 3,488 995 3,382 4,136 Rural 466 1,069 175 41 114 150 Less Sparse 466 1,069 175 41 114 150 Town 243 478 69 19 62 85 Village 223 591 106 22 52 65 Dispersed --- --- Sparse --- --- Town --- --- Village --- --- Dispersed --- --- Total 15,116 26,560 3,663 1,036 3,496 4,286 South East Urban 1,484,269 2,144,729 394,163 117,467 419,736 402,101 Rural 334,414 720,409 138,401 29,317 105,734 115,963 Total 1,818,683 2,865,138 532,564 146,784 525,470 518,064 Source tables from the Census: UV04 Age and UV07 Marital Status Estimated proportions of people aged 16 or over in rural parts of the Authority, by marital status. 7% Single (never 6% 23% married) 2% Married (first marriage) 9% Re-married Separated (but still legally married) Divorced Widowed 53% Source tables from the Census: UV04 Age and UV07 Marital Status 6 Household composition In Epsom and Ewell 3.7% of households are in rural areas. 22.2% of rural households are single person households. 6.7% of rural households are lone parent family households. Number of households, by composition of the household Urban Rural % rural Total Total Less sparse Sparse Town Village Dispersed Town Village Dispersed Total number of households 26,360 1,005 494 511 - - - - 3.7 One person household 7,122 223 131 92 - - - - 3.0 pensioner 3,954 120 68 52 - - - - 2.9 other 3,168 103 63 40 - - - - 3.1 All pensioner family 2,670 99 46 53 - - - - 3.6 Married couple family 10,944 491 208 283 - - - - 4.3 no children 3,658 174 75 99 - - - - 4.5 with one dependent child 2,025 97 33 64 - - - - 4.6 with two or more dependent children 3,429 155 63 92 - - - - 4.3 all children non-dependent 1,832 65 37 28 - - - - 3.4 Cohabiting couple family 1,980 62 33 29 - - - - 3.0 no children 1,287 36 16 20 - - - - 2.7 with one dependent child 307 16 7 9 - - - - 5.0 two or more dependent children 305 7 7 - - - - - 2.2 all children non-dependent 81 3 3 - - - - - 3.6 Lone parent family 1,920 67 41 26 - - - - 3.4 with one dependent child 635 16 10 6 - - - - 2.5 with two or more dependant children 553 20 12 8 - - - - 3.5 all children non-dependent 732 31 19 12 - - - - 4.1 Other households 1,724 63 35 28 - - - - 3.5 with one dependent child 246 9 3 6 - - - - 3.5 with two or more dependent children 259 12 6 6 - - - - 4.4 all student 118 3 3 - - - - - 2.5 all pensioner 111 6 3 3 - - - - 5.1 other 990 33 20 13 - - - - 3.2 Source table from the Census: UV65 Household Composition (households) A dependent child is a person in a household aged 0 to 15 (whether or not in a family) or a person aged 16 to 18 who is a full-time student in a family with parent(s). 7 Percentage of households by composition of household for the Authority and the Government Office Region. 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Proportion of total number households Urban Rural Urban Rural Epsom and Ewell South East one person all pensioner family married couple family cohabiting couple family household lone parent family other households Source table from the Census: UV65 Household Composition (households) Classification of household deprivation The classification of household deprivation on the Census is independent of the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation published by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Four dimensions from the Census returns have been identified as giving an indication of household deprivation. Households are considered deprived if one or more of the following definitions applies to that household: Employment – any member of the household aged 16-74 who is not a full-time student is classified as either unemployed or permanently sick. Education – no member of the household aged 16 to pensionable age has at least 5 GCSE’s (grade A to C) or equivalent AND no member of the household aged 16 to 18 is in full-time education. Health and disability – any member of the household has general health ‘not good’ in the year before the census or has a limiting long term illness. Housing – The household’s accommodation is either overcrowded, or is in a shared dwelling, or does not have sole use of bath/shower and toilet, or has no central heating. 8 Classification of household deprivation (number of households) Epsom and Ewell South East Not deprived Deprived on Deprived on Deprived on Deprived on Not deprived Deprived on on any 1 2 3 all 4 on any 1 or more dimension dimension dimensions dimensions dimensions dimension dimensions Urban 10,600 9,392 5,168 1,102 122 894,858 1,671,844 Rural 434 361 192 29 - 277,521 443,090 Less Sparse 434 361 192 29 - 277,406 442,550 Town 190 183 108 19 - 116,111 204,884 Village 244 178 84 10 - 107,661 165,481 Dispersed - - - - - 53,634 72,185 Sparse -- - - -115540 Town -- - - -18109 Village -- - - -97431 Dispersed -- - - --- Source table from the Census: UV67 Classification of household deprivation Comparison of household deprivation in urban and rural parts of the Authority 100% Deprived on all 4 dimensions 90% 80% Deprived on 3 70% dimensions 60% Deprived on 2 50% dimensions 40% 30% Deprived on 1 Proportion of households dimension 20% 10% Not deprived on 0% any dimension Urban Epsom Rural Epsom South East and Ewell and Ewell Source table from the Census: UV67 Classification of household deprivation Health and provision of unpaid care There were two measure of ‘health’ on the Census.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Surrey Landscape Character Assessment Figures 1-9-2015
    KEY km north 0 1 2 3 4 5 Surrey District and Borough boundaries Natural England National Character Areas: Hampshire Downs (Area 130) High Weald (Area 122) Inner London (Area 112) Low Weald (Area 121) Spelthorne North Downs (Area 119) North Kent Plain (Area 113) Northern Thames Basin (Area 111) Thames Basin Heaths (Area 129) Runnymede Thames Basin Lowlands (Area 114) Thames Valley (Area 115) Wealden Greensand (Area 120) Elmbridge © Na tu ral Englan d copy righ t 201 4 Surrey Heath Epsom and Ewell Woking Reigate and Banstead Guildford Tandridge Mole Valley Waverley CLIENT: Surrey County Council & Surrey Hills AONB Board PROJECT: Surrey Landscape Character Assessm ent TITLE: Natural England National Character Areas SCALE: DATE: 1:160,000 at A3 September 2014 595.1 / 50 1 Figure 1 Based on Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Licence no. AR187372 © hankinson duckett associates The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8B A t 01491 838175 e [email protected] w www.hda-enviro.co.uk Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology KEY km north 0 1 2 3 4 5 Surrey District and Borough boundaries Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB): Surrey Hills AONB High Weald AONB Kent Downs AONB National Park: Spelthorne South Downs National Park Runnymede Elmbridge Surrey Heath Epsom and Ewell Woking Reigate and Banstead Guildford Tandridge Mole Valley Waverley CLIENT: Surrey County Council & Surrey Hills AONB Board PROJECT: Surrey Landscape Character Assessm ent TITLE: Surrey Districts & Boroughs, AONBs & National Park SCALE: DATE: 1:160,000 at A3 September 2014 595.1 / 50 2 Figure 2 Based on Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Licence no.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Influencer – Epsom and Ewell Volunteer Role Profile
    Community Influencer – Epsom and Ewell Volunteer Role Profile Do you want to make a difference to health and social care services in Epsom and Ewell, and ensure that residents have a say in how the care they receive is delivered? Who are Healthwatch Surrey? • We are statutory organisation that listens to what local people say about the health and social care services they access. • We take their views and concerns to decision makers, to influence and improve how local services are run. • We also offer information and advice through our Helpdesk, and our free, independent NHS complaints and advocacy service. How do we make a difference? • We work closely with the CQC, Surrey County Council, Clinical Commissioners and NHS service providers to provide feedback from patients, escalate concerns and work to improve services based on the patient experiences our staff and volunteers have collected. • We engage with hard-to-reach communities, especially those at risk of health inequalities to ensure everyone has a say in the care they receive. How can I help? An exciting opportunity has arisen to help us develop a volunteer team to support our work in the Mole Valley and Epsom and Ewell areas. You will be instrumental in helping to develop our ‘Surrey Downs’ volunteer group, who will reach out to communities in the area to hear their recent experiences of health and social care and work with local NHS and social care providers to improve services. What will I do as a Community Influencer in the Surrey Downs volunteer group? • Work with our team and the group Chair to agree the priorities and a workplan for the group.
    [Show full text]
  • TEF 84396 Head of Planning the Chief Planning Officer Epsom
    Our Ref: TEF_84396 Head of Planning The Chief Planning Officer Epsom and Ewell Borough Council Development Planning Town Hall The Parade Epsom KT18 5BY 02/02/2021 Dear Sir/Madam, CLARIFICATION OF THE DECLARATION OF ICNIRP COMPLIANCE ISSUED AS PART OF THE PLANNING APPLICATION ATTACHED FOR THE SITE CORNERSTONE AT CTIL_239867 TEF_84396 CAPITOL SQUARE, 4-6 CHURCH STREET, EPSOM, SURREY, KT17 4NR I refer to the Declaration of Conformity with ICNIRP Public Exposure Guidelines (“ICNIRP Declaration”), sent with this application in relation to the proposed telecommunications installation as detailed above. The “ICNIRP Declaration” certifies that the site is designed to be in full compliance with the requirements of the radio frequency (RF) guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) for public exposure as expressed in the EU Council recommendation of July 1999. This ICNIRP declaration takes into account the cumulative effect of the emissions from the proposed installation and all radio base stations present at, or near, the proposed location. The radio emission compliance calculation is based upon the maximum possible cumulative values. All operators of radio transmitters are under a legal obligation to operate those transmitters in accordance with the conditions of their licence. Operation of the transmitter in accordance with the conditions of the licence fulfils the legal obligations in respect of interference to other radio systems, other electrical equipment, instrumentation or air traffic systems. The conditions of the licence are mandated by Ofcom, an agency of national government, who are responsible for the regulation of the civilian radio spectrum. The remit of Ofcom also includes investigation and remedy of any reported significant interference.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond
    The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond Hugo Bessis and Adeline Bailly October, 2017 1 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 About Centre for Cities Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the economic success of UK cities. We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this through impartial research and knowledge exchange. For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about About the authors Hugo Bessis is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4323 Adeline Bailly is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4317 Picture credit “Astral Towers” by Andy Skudder (http://bit.ly/2krxCKQ), licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0) Supported by 2 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 Executive Summary The Gatwick Diamond is not only one of the South East’s strongest economies, but also one of the UK’s best performing areas. But growth brings with it a number of pressures too, which need to be managed to maintain the success of the area. This report measures the performance of the Gatwick Diamond relative to four comparator areas in the South East, benchmarking its success and setting out some of the policy challenges for the future. The Gatwick Diamond makes a strong contribution to the UK economy. It performs well above the national average on a range of different economic indicators, such as its levels of productivity, its share of high-skilled jobs, and its track record of attracting foreign investment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Runway for Gatwick
    A Second Runway for Gatwick Our April 2014 Runway Options Consultation 2 Gatwick Runway Options Consultation Contents Foreword 05 Section 1 Our consultation 07 Section 2 Our runway options 11 2.1 Features common to all options 15 2.2 Option descriptions 21 2.3 Airport Surface Access Strategy 29 2.4 Environmental and social effects of the options 43 2.5 Economic effects of a second runway 55 Section 3 Our evaluation of the options 59 Section 4 Community engagement 65 4.1 Working with our communities 66 4.2 Tackling noise 67 4.3 Taking responsibility for our impacts 68 Section 5 Your opportunity to get involved 73 Appendix 1 Policy context 76 Appendix 2 Runway crossings 81 Plan 0A Context plan - Environmental features 93 Plan 1A Option 1 Layout plan 94 Plan 1B Option 1 Boundary plan 95 Plan 1C Option 1 Air Noise Contour plan 96 Plan 2A Option 2 Layout plan 97 Plan 2B Option 2 Boundary plan 98 Plan 2C Option 2 Air Noise Contour plan 99 Plan 3A Option 3 Layout plan 100 Plan 3B Option 3 Boundary plan 101 Plan 3C Option 3 Air Noise Contour plan 102 Gatwick Runway Options Consultation 3 Foreword In its Interim Report published in December 2013, the Airports Commission included Gatwick in its shortlist of potential locations for the next runway in the UK. In 2015, the Airports Commission will recommend to Government where the next runway should be built. We recognise that the local communities around Gatwick will have many questions about what a second runway at Gatwick would mean for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Clive Woodbridge
    IfIf elected elected II Iwill:will: will: CLIVECLIVECLIVE WOODBRIDGE WOODBRIDGEWOODBRIDGE SURREYSURREYSURREY COUNTYCOUNTY COUNTY ❖ ❖ WorkWork tirelessly tirelessly on on behalf behalf ofof of allall all TownTown Town andand and CliveCliveClive is isis an anan experienced experiencedexperienced local local RA RA councillor councillor having havinghaving COUNCILCOUNCILCOUNCIL ELECTIONELECTION ELECTION DownsDowns residents, residents, regardless regardless ofof of nationalnational national servedservedserved on onon Epsom EpsomEpsom & && Ewell Ewell Borough Borough Council CouncilCouncil since sincesince partyparty politics, politics, representing representing youryour your interestsinterests interests atat at 2007.2007.2007. He HeHe has hashas been beenbeen chairman chairman ofof thethe RARARA group groupgroup of ofof EPSOMEPSOMEPSOM TOWNTOWN TOWN ANDAND AND DOWNSDOWNS DOWNS SurreySurrey County County Council Council CouncillorsCouncillorsCouncillors for forfor over overover Þve Þve years, years, leading leading the thethe delivery deliverydelivery ThursdayThursdayThursday 4th4th 4th MayMay May 2017 2017 ofofof savingssavingssavings andandand efÞciencyefÞciencyefÞciency gainsgains whilewhile protectingprotectingprotecting ❖ Respond❖ Respond promptly promptly toto to enquiriesenquiries enquiries fromfrom from services.services.services. Clive CliveClive also alsoalso sits sitssits on on Epsom Epsom & & Walton Walton Downs DownsDowns residentsresidents and and consult consult withwith with themthem them onon on keykey key Conservators,Conservators,Conservators,
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Strategic Partnership Plan 2010 - 2020
    Standing up for Surrey Surrey Strategic Partnership Plan 2010 - 2020 This document is available from www.surreycc.gov.uk/communityplanning If you would like more information on the Surrey Strategic Partnership to comment on the Community Strategy to know how you can get involved or contribute to some of the work described in this document Please contact us: Tel: 020 8541 7406 email: [email protected] If you would like this document in large print, on tape or in another language please contact us on: Tel: 03456 009 009 Fax: 020 8541 9004, Minicom: 020 8541 8914 email: [email protected] The Surrey Strategic Partnership produced this plan on behalf of Surrey’s public sector agencies, business, voluntary, community, and faith sectors. This plan fulfils the requirements of the Local Government Act 2000, which requires Surrey County Council to prepare a Sustainable Community Strategy with partners that demonstrates how local organisations and agencies will work together to improve the economic, social and environmental well-being of the county. Contents Contents Foreword by Dr Andrew Povey ................................................................................... 4 Part 1.............................................................................................................................. 6 Surrey in 2020 ............................................................................................................... 8 Five Key Challenges....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gatwick Diamond Strategic Partnership Group
    Our ref: TC/scw Your ref: E-mail: [email protected] Boris Johnson, Mayor of London (London Infrastructure Plan 2050) Direct line: 01403 215101 GLA City Hall, Contact: The Queen’s Walk, Date: 29 October 2014 London SE1 2AA Dear Mr Johnson London Infrastructure Plan 2050 – July 2014 I am writing on behalf of the Gatwick Diamond Local Authorities* in response to your consultation on the London Infrastructure Plan 2050. By way of introduction, you may wish to note that the Gatwick Diamond Local Authorities have a history of cooperation on strategic planning and development issues. We link closely to, and on key economic issues form part of, the Gatwick Diamond Initiative, one of the five spatial partnerships which make up the Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership. We have an agreed Memorandum of Understanding setting out how we work together on issues which cross local authority boundaries and a Local Strategic Statement, finalised in early 2012, which we are looking to update. We intend to liaise closely with areas outside the Gatwick Diamond, including London, as we look to review the Local Strategic Statement. We acknowledge that infrastructure to support the projected scale of economic and population growth to 2050 is a key issue for London and that a coordinated infrastructure plan is highly desirable. However, we note that the Plan explores a number of scenarios about where growth can be accommodated within London and beyond London’s boundaries ‘as a precursor to the next full revision of the London Plan after 2016’. Indicative maps in the Plan and supporting documentation highlight the Gatwick area as a potential growth area in the context of accommodating some of London’s forecast increase in population.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting in London
    CIS 2014-11 Commuting in London July 2014 The 2011 Census recorded the place of work and method of travel to work of all respondents aged 16 or over. The Special Workplace Statistics dataset provides information on travel to work flows and the characteristics of workers based on where they live (origin) and where they work (destination). This summary document provides an overview of commuting in London and is based on the first origin- destination outputs from the 2011 Census which were released on 25th July, 2014. Key Findings Net commuting inflow from the rest of England and Wales to London was 519,000 in 2011 up seven per cent since 2001. Both inflows and outflows were higher than in 2001: inflows rose nine per cent to 790,000 while outflows rose 15 per cent to 271,000. Within London, more than two million persons worked in a different local authority to their residence. Nearly 400,000 workers commuted into Westminster from the rest of London, while 115,000 commuted out of Wandsworth to the rest of London. The largest single cross-border flow was 29,100 from Wandsworth to Westminster. Twenty-four local authorities outside London had 10,000 or more London commuters. Dartford replaced Slough as the top destination for commuters from London. 356,500 people commuted to jobs in the City of London. 40 per cent from inner London, 29 per cent from outer London, 31 per cent from outside London 558,900 people commuted to jobs in Westminster. 46 per cent from inner London, 32 per cent from outer London, 23 per cent from outside London 103,500 people commuted to jobs in Canary Wharf.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition of the Willing: the Shape of Urban Growth in England Post Crisis
    Coalition of the Willing: The Shape of Urban Growth in England post Crisis Glen Bramley & David Watkins [email protected] Highbury Group on Housing Delivery – Dec 2014 Based on ENHR Conference - July 2014 Workshop 12 – Metropolitan Dynamics Background Growing support, if not consensus, on need to build more housing Demand side ‘fixed’, but supply constraints more intractable Any serious drive to increase supply will need to focus on key areas of opportunity – but where? Balancing need/demand, capacity, leverage, and political will. Policy Levers Planning numbers – NPPG & SHMAs Land availability – SHLAAs & 5 yr supply Incentives – CIL, s.106, NHB Public investment – afford hsg & infrastructure Local sentiment – some shift but still mismatch Land ownership & takeup – still pushing string Development vehicles e.g. Dev Corps (with CPO powers & modified compensation rules) Sub-regional focus – ‘Duty to Cooperate’ vs ‘Right to Grow’ Key Dimensions of Potential Capacity – land (bf & gf), constraints (BUA, GB, AONB, NP), density, location/access, [topography, flood risk, etc] Demand – demographics, prices/rents, afford’y, employment Planning Stance – land avail & other proxies Current Performance – consents, completions, NHB Local Sentiment – BSAS surveys & predictions Measured initially by index of simple sum of z-scores Housebuilding Capacity Greater in more rural areas Esp in East, far West & Nth Low around London, rising at edge of Gtr SE Indicators incl % green land, sparsity, area, unconstrained (not GB, AONB, NP,
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Landscape Character Assessment: Epsom and Ewell Borough
    Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology Surrey Landscape Character Assessment: Epsom and Ewell Borough April 2015 hankinson duckett associates t 01491 838175 e [email protected] w www.hda-enviro.co.uk The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA Hankinson Duckett Associates Limited Registered in England & Wales 3462810 Registered Office: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BA Surrey Landscape Character Assessment 2015: Epsom and Ewell Borough ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Surrey Landscape Character Assessment 2015 was prepared by Hankinson Duckett Associates (HDA), on behalf of Surrey County Council and the Surrey Planning Officers Association (SPOA). The study was jointly funded and supported by Natural England (NE), the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Board, and local Surrey planning authorities. The work has been guided by Charmaine Smith of Surrey County Council, assisted by John Edwards of Surrey County Council, Simon Elson of Surrey County Council, and with the support of Officers from the Surrey planning authorities; Rod Shaw: Mole Valley District Council, Paul Newdick: Tandridge District Council, Sophie Benazon, Catherine Rose and Elizabeth Walker: Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, Matthew Ellis: Waverley Borough Council, Kay Richardson: Guildford Borough Council, Geoff Dawes: Spelthorne Borough Council, Richard Ford & Georgina Pacey: Runnymede Borough Council, Ernest Amoako: Woking Borough Council, Karol Jakubczyk: Epsom & Ewell Borough Council,
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Mobility Index
    The Social Mobility Index 1 Contents Foreword 3 What is the Social Mobility Index? 5 Summary 5 Methodology 6 Geographical variation in the Social Mobility Index 9 Analysing performance against the Social Mobility Index 18 Key Headlines 21 Early Years 28 School 31 Youth 34 Adulthood 37 2 Foreword On the morning after the election, the Prime Minister set a One Nation agenda for this Parliament. Britain, he said, should be “a place where a good life is in reach for everyone who is willing to work and do the right thing”. His would be a Government that offered opportunity to all, no matter where they came from. These are welcome commitments but in this report we examine the very real challenges facing the Government in creating a One Nation Britain. For the first time it identifies the most and the least socially mobile areas of the country. It does so by examining in detail the chances available to young people from poorer backgrounds in each of the 324 local authority areas in England to get the educational qualifications they need to succeed in life, and the opportunities in the local area to convert those qualifications into a good job and a decent standard of living. The Social Mobility Index uncovers a new geography of disadvantage in England. For decades the conventional wisdom has been that geographical inequalities in social mobility are drawn across simple boundaries: the North versus the South; rich areas versus poor areas; town versus country. Our analysis suggests that some of this is right – there are worrying signs, for example, that London and its commuter belt is pulling away from the rest of the country when it comes to the chances of youngsters getting into good schools and good jobs.
    [Show full text]