A Dynamic Rod Model to Simulate Mechanics of Cables and Dna

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Dynamic Rod Model to Simulate Mechanics of Cables and Dna A DYNAMIC ROD MODEL TO SIMULATE MECHANICS OF CABLES AND DNA by Sachin Goyal A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mechanical Engineering and Scientific Computing) in The University of Michigan 2006 Doctoral Committee: Professor Noel Perkins, Chair Associate Professor Edgar Meyhofer, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Ioan Andricioaei Assistant Professor Krishnakumar Garikipati Assistant Professor Jens-Christian Meiners Dedication To my parents ii Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful to my advisor Prof. Noel Perkins for his highly conducive and motivating research guidance and overall mentoring. I sincerely appreciate many engaging discussions of DNA mechanics and supercoiling with Prof. E. Meyhofer and Prof. K. Garikipati in Mechanical Engineering Program, Prof. C. Meiners in the Biophysics Program, Prof. I. Andricioaei in the Biochemistry/ Biophysics Program and and Dr. S. Blumberg in Medical school at the University of Michigan and Dr. C. L. Lee at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California. I also appreciate Professor Jason D. Kahn (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland) for providing the sequences used in his experiments, and Professor Wilma K. Olson (Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University) for suggesting alternative binding topologies in DNA-protein complexes. I also acknowledge recent graduate students T. Lillian in Mechanical Engineering Program, D. Wilson in Physics Program and J. Wereszczynski in Chemistry Program to extend my work and collaborate on ongoing studies beyond the scope of dissertation. I also gratefully acknowledge the research support provided by the U. S. Office of Naval Research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, and the National Science Foundation. iii Table of Contents Dedication........................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................iii List of Figures.................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xi List of Appendices ............................................................................................................ xii Abstract............................................................................................................................xiii Chapter................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Underwater (Marine) Cable Applications............................................................. 4 1.2 Mechanics of DNA: Looping and Supercoiling ................................................... 8 1.3 Research Objective ............................................................................................. 13 1.4 Scope of Dissertation and Previous Rod Theories.............................................. 15 1.5 Summary of Research Contributions.................................................................. 21 2. The Rod Model – Theoretical Formulation .......................................................... 30 2.1 Definitions and Assumptions.............................................................................. 30 2.2 Equations of Motion ........................................................................................... 33 2.3 Constraints and Summary................................................................................... 34 3. The Rod Model – Computational Formulation..................................................... 37 3.1 The Generalized-α Method ................................................................................. 37 3.2 Space-Time Discretization.................................................................................. 40 3.3 Kinematics of Cross-Section Rotation................................................................ 45 3.4 Summary of Numerical Enhancements .............................................................. 47 4. Benchmarking and Extensions of Prior Studies: Equilibria and Dynamic Transitions..................................................................................................................... 49 4.1 Input Parameters ................................................................................................. 50 4.1.1 Constitutive Law.......................................................................................... 50 4.1.2 Distributed Loading ..................................................................................... 52 4.1.3 Initial and Boundary Conditions.................................................................. 54 4.2 Equilibria Benchmarking (Slow Loading d& → 0) ............................................. 56 4.2.1 Case 1: R/ = 0, Planar buckling .................................................................... 57 4.2.2 Case 2: R/ = 0, Spatial buckling.................................................................... 59 4.2.3 Case 3: R/ =1 Planar and spatial buckling.................................................. 60 4.3 Dynamics and Hysteresis (Fast Loading - Finite d& ).......................................... 62 5. Tension-Torque Coupling..................................................................................... 67 5.1 Modified Constitutive Law................................................................................. 67 iv 5.2 Modified Buckling Condition (Linear)............................................................... 70 5.3 Influence on Loop Topology and Bifurcations (Nonlinear) ............................... 72 5.4 Summary of Effects of Tension-Torque Coupling ............................................. 77 6. Dynamics of Self-Contact and Intertwining ......................................................... 79 6.1 Numerical Model of Dynamic Self-Contact....................................................... 79 6.2 Torsional Buckling Leading To Intertwining ..................................................... 81 6.3 Topological Changes .......................................................................................... 87 7. Protein-Mediated DNA Looping .......................................................................... 91 7.1 Introduction to LacR-DNA Modeling ................................................................ 91 7.2 Methods............................................................................................................... 95 7.3 Results............................................................................................................... 103 7.4 Discussion and Conclusions ............................................................................. 110 8. Summary, Conclusions and Future Work........................................................... 123 8.1 Summary and Major Conclusions..................................................................... 123 8.2 Future Work on DNA ....................................................................................... 127 8.2.1 Structural Characterization of DNA ......................................................... 127 8.2.2 Modeling Entropic Effects......................................................................... 129 8.2.3 Coupling of Protein Flexibility/ Dynamics................................................ 130 8.2.4 Histone Unwrapping .................................................................................. 130 Appendices...................................................................................................................... 133 v List of Figures Figure 1.1 Low tension cable forming loops and tangles on the sea floor. ........................ 1 Figure 1.2 Electron micrographs of a DNA polymer in two different conformations (Courtesy: Lehninger et al. [2]). The interwound conformation (lower image) is an example of intertwining that is topologically equivalent to tangles in underwater cables.................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1.3 A twisted cable collapses under slack conditions and ultimately forms a loop or hockle as well as an intertwined ‘snarl’ (Courtesy: Goss et al. [4])................... 5 Figure 1.4 S-tether mooring collapses into a loop (‘hockle’) under torsion (due to yawing) in a low-tension zone. The symbol ρ represents density. ....................................... 6 Figure 1.5 DNA shown on three length scales. Smallest scale (left) shows double-helix structure (sugar-phosphate chains and base-pairs). Intermediate scale (middle) shows how several double-helices form a continuous piece of double-stranded DNA. Largest scale (right) shows how the strand ultimately curves and twists in forming supercoils (one interwound or plectonemic, and one solenoidal). (Courtesy: Branden and Tooze [10] and Lehninger et al. [2])................................ 9 Figure 2.1 Free body diagram of an infinitesimal element of a Kirchhoff rod................. 31 Figure 3.1 Space-time disretization grid (Method of Lines)............................................
Recommended publications
  • Engineering Curves – I
    Engineering Curves – I 1. Classification 2. Conic sections - explanation 3. Common Definition 4. Ellipse – ( six methods of construction) 5. Parabola – ( Three methods of construction) 6. Hyperbola – ( Three methods of construction ) 7. Methods of drawing Tangents & Normals ( four cases) Engineering Curves – II 1. Classification 2. Definitions 3. Involutes - (five cases) 4. Cycloid 5. Trochoids – (Superior and Inferior) 6. Epic cycloid and Hypo - cycloid 7. Spiral (Two cases) 8. Helix – on cylinder & on cone 9. Methods of drawing Tangents and Normals (Three cases) ENGINEERING CURVES Part- I {Conic Sections} ELLIPSE PARABOLA HYPERBOLA 1.Concentric Circle Method 1.Rectangle Method 1.Rectangular Hyperbola (coordinates given) 2.Rectangle Method 2 Method of Tangents ( Triangle Method) 2 Rectangular Hyperbola 3.Oblong Method (P-V diagram - Equation given) 3.Basic Locus Method 4.Arcs of Circle Method (Directrix – focus) 3.Basic Locus Method (Directrix – focus) 5.Rhombus Metho 6.Basic Locus Method Methods of Drawing (Directrix – focus) Tangents & Normals To These Curves. CONIC SECTIONS ELLIPSE, PARABOLA AND HYPERBOLA ARE CALLED CONIC SECTIONS BECAUSE THESE CURVES APPEAR ON THE SURFACE OF A CONE WHEN IT IS CUT BY SOME TYPICAL CUTTING PLANES. OBSERVE ILLUSTRATIONS GIVEN BELOW.. Ellipse Section Plane Section Plane Hyperbola Through Generators Parallel to Axis. Section Plane Parallel to end generator. COMMON DEFINATION OF ELLIPSE, PARABOLA & HYPERBOLA: These are the loci of points moving in a plane such that the ratio of it’s distances from a fixed point And a fixed line always remains constant. The Ratio is called ECCENTRICITY. (E) A) For Ellipse E<1 B) For Parabola E=1 C) For Hyperbola E>1 Refer Problem nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Engineering Inspired by Swarm Robotics
    RICE UNIVERSITY Art and Engineering Inspired by Swarm Robotics by Yu Zhou A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved, Thesis Committee: Ronald Goldman, Chair Professor of Computer Science Joe Warren Professor of Computer Science Marcia O'Malley Professor of Mechanical Engineering Houston, Texas April, 2017 ABSTRACT Art and Engineering Inspired by Swarm Robotics by Yu Zhou Swarm robotics has the potential to combine the power of the hive with the sen- sibility of the individual to solve non-traditional problems in mechanical, industrial, and architectural engineering and to develop exquisite art beyond the ken of most contemporary painters, sculptors, and architects. The goal of this thesis is to apply swarm robotics to the sublime and the quotidian to achieve this synergy between art and engineering. The potential applications of collective behaviors, manipulation, and self-assembly are quite extensive. We will concentrate our research on three topics: fractals, stabil- ity analysis, and building an enhanced multi-robot simulator. Self-assembly of swarm robots into fractal shapes can be used both for artistic purposes (fractal sculptures) and in engineering applications (fractal antennas). Stability analysis studies whether distributed swarm algorithms are stable and robust either to sensing or to numerical errors, and tries to provide solutions to avoid unstable robot configurations. Our enhanced multi-robot simulator supports this research by providing real-time simula- tions with customized parameters, and can become as well a platform for educating a new generation of artists and engineers. The goal of this thesis is to use techniques inspired by swarm robotics to develop a computational framework accessible to and suitable for both artists and engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Geometry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses July 2016 Physical Geometry James P. Binkoski University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Metaphysics Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Binkoski, James P., "Physical Geometry" (2016). Doctoral Dissertations. 625. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/625 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYSICAL GEOMETRY A Dissertation Presented by JAMES BINKOSKI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2016 Philosophy c Copyright by James Binkoski 2016 All Rights Reserved PHYSICAL GEOMETRY A Dissertation Presented by JAMES BINKOSKI Approved as to style and content by: Bradford Skow, Chair Phillip Bricker, Member Christopher Meacham, Member Lorenzo Sorbo, Member Joseph Levine, Department Chair Philosophy DEDICATION To Jen. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Most of what I know about how to do philosophy well, I learned from Phil Bricker, Chris Meacham, and Brad Skow. I thank them for their guidance and support over a period of many years. I consider myself incredibly fortunate to have studied with such top-notch philosophers. I am especially grateful to Brad Skow for agreeing to work with me after his move from UMass to MIT in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relevance of the Differential Expressions $ F^ 2+ F'^ 2$, $ F+ F
    On the relevance of the differential expressions 2 2 2 f + f ′ , f + f ′′ and ff ′′ f ′ for the geometrical and mechanical− properties of curves James Bell Cooper Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Kepler problem 9 2.1 Kepler’ssecondlaw........................ 9 2.2 Theinversesquarelaw ...................... 10 2.3 The Newton-Somerville equation . 11 2.4 Acriterionforapowerlaw. 13 2.5 Someapplications......................... 13 2.6 Twosimplecases ......................... 14 3 The Affine Curvature of an Orbit Determines the Force Law 16 3.1 Further geometric quantities associated with orbits . 16 3.2 Affinecurvature.......................... 17 3.3 Acomputationalproof . 18 arXiv:1102.1579v1 [math-ph] 8 Feb 2011 3.4 Aconceptualproof ........................ 19 4 The Kasner-Arnold duality 20 4.1 Sinusoidal spirals and the d-transformation . 20 4.2 Thegeneralsituation . .. .. 21 5 A Duality between Trajectories for Central and Parallel Force Laws 23 5.1 Curves of the form (F (t), f(t)).................. 24 5.2 The duality (quadrality) . 25 1 5.3 Examplesofduality........................ 26 5.4 The sinusoidal spirals and catenaries . 28 6 On the expressions f 2 + f ′2, f + f ′′, ff ′′ f 2, how to solve the ′ ′′ −′′ equations f 2 + f 2 = af α, f + f = bf β, ff f 2 = cf γ and why one might want to − 29 6.1 The relationship between the equations . 30 6.2 Somesolutions .......................... 30 6.3 Wheretheexpressionsarise . 32 6.4 The calculus of variations . 33 6.5 Twomoresubtleexamples . 34 6.6 Miscellanea ............................ 35 6.6.1 The explicit form of the parametrisation (Fd(t), fd(t)) 35 6.6.2 Theconnectionwithcontactgeometry . 35 6.6.3 Curveswithprescribedcurvature .
    [Show full text]
  • Helix, and Its Implementation in Architecture
    Appendix 1 to Guidelines for Preparation, Defence and Storage of Final Projects KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE FACULTY Emin Vahid CONTEMPORARY TRENDS OF ARCHITECTURAL GEOMETRY. HELIX AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN ARCHITECTURE. Master’s Degree Final Project Supervisor Lect. Arch. Vytautas Baltus KAUNAS, 2017 KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE FACULTY TITLE OF FINAL PROJECT Master’s Degree Final Project Contemporary Trends of Architectural Geometry. Helix and its implementation in architecture (code 621K10001) Supervisor (signature) Lect. Arch. Vytautas Baltus (date) Reviewer (signature) Assoc. prof. dr. Gintaris Cinelis (date) Project made by (signature) Emin Vahid (date) KAUNAS, 2017 ~ 1 ~ Appendix 4 to Guidelines for Preparation, Defence and Storage of Final Projects KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Civil Engineering and Architecture (Faculty) Emin Vahid (Student's name, surname) Master degree Architecture 6211PX026 (Title and code of study programme) "Contemporary trends of architectural geometry. Helix and its implementation in architecture" DECLARATION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY 22 05 2017 Kaunas I confirm that the final project of mine, Emin Vahid, on the subject “Contemporary trends of architectural geometry. Helix and its implementation in architecture.” is written completely by myself; all the provided data and research results are correct and have been obtained honestly. None of the parts of this thesis have been plagiarized from any printed, Internet-based or otherwise recorded sources. All direct and indirect quotations from external resources are indicated in the list of references. No monetary funds (unless required by law) have been paid to anyone for any contribution to this thesis. I fully and completely understand that any discovery of any manifestations/case/facts of dishonesty inevitably results in me incurring a penalty according to the procedure(s) effective at Kaunas University of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak Notice
    MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY ROHTAK (Established under Haryana Act No. XXV of 1975) ‘A+’ Grade University accredited by NAAC NOTICE FOR INVITING SUGGESTIONS/COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SYLLABI OF B.A, B.SC., B.COM. UNDER CBCS Comments/suggestions are invited from all the stakeholders i.e Deans of the Faculties, HODs, Faculties and Principals of Affiliated Colleges on the Syllabi and Scheme of Examinations of B.A, B.Sc., B.Com. Programmes under CBCS (copy enclosed) through e-mail to the Dean, Academic Affairs upto 15.09.2020, so that the same may be incorporated in the final draft. Dean Academic Affairs B.A. Program Program Specific Objectives: i) To impart conceptual and theoretical knowledge of Mathematics and its various tools/techniques. ii) To equip with analytic and problem solving techniques to deal with the problems related to diversified fields. Program Specific Outcomes. Student would be able to: i) Acquire analytical and logical thinking through various mathematical tools and techniques and attain in-depth knowledge to pursue higher studies and ability to conduct research. ii) Achieve targets of successfully clearing various examinations/interviews for placements in teaching, banks, industries and various other organisations/services. B.A Pass Course under Choice Based Credit System Department of Mathematics Proposed Scheme of Examination SEMESTE COURSE OPTED COURSE NAME Credits Marks Internal Total Assessment Marks I Ability Enhancement (English/ Hindi/ MIL 4 80 20 100 Compulsory Course-I Communication)/ Environmental Science Core
    [Show full text]
  • DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: a First Course in Curves and Surfaces
    DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces Preliminary Version Fall, 2015 Theodore Shifrin University of Georgia Dedicated to the memory of Shiing-Shen Chern, my adviser and friend c 2015 Theodore Shifrin No portion of this work may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the author, other than duplication at nominal cost for those readers or students desiring a hard copy. CONTENTS 1. CURVES.................... 1 1. Examples, Arclength Parametrization 1 2. Local Theory: Frenet Frame 10 3. SomeGlobalResults 23 2. SURFACES: LOCAL THEORY . 35 1. Parametrized Surfaces and the First Fundamental Form 35 2. The Gauss Map and the Second Fundamental Form 44 3. The Codazzi and Gauss Equations and the Fundamental Theorem of Surface Theory 57 4. Covariant Differentiation, Parallel Translation, and Geodesics 66 3. SURFACES: FURTHER TOPICS . 79 1. Holonomy and the Gauss-Bonnet Theorem 79 2. An Introduction to Hyperbolic Geometry 91 3. Surface Theory with Differential Forms 101 4. Calculus of Variations and Surfaces of Constant Mean Curvature 107 Appendix. REVIEW OF LINEAR ALGEBRA AND CALCULUS . 114 1. Linear Algebra Review 114 2. Calculus Review 116 3. Differential Equations 118 SOLUTIONS TO SELECTED EXERCISES . 121 INDEX ................... 124 Problems to which answers or hints are given at the back of the book are marked with an asterisk (*). Fundamental exercises that are particularly important (and to which reference is made later) are marked with a sharp (]). August, 2015 CHAPTER 1 Curves 1. Examples, Arclength Parametrization We say a vector function f .a; b/ R3 is Ck (k 0; 1; 2; : : :) if f and its first k derivatives, f , f ,..., W ! D 0 00 f.k/, exist and are all continuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Archimedes Do Calculus?
    Did Archimedes Do Calculus? Jeff Powers jeff[email protected] Grand Rapids Community College 143 Bostwick Ave NE Grand Rapids, MI 49503 March 30, 2020 1 Introduction The works of Archimedes (c. 287–212 BCE) read like modern mathemat- ics: fully-formed, to the point, and clever. Heath calls them “monuments of mathematical exposition” that are “so impressive in their perfection as to create a feeling akin to awe in the mind of the reader” [14]. Many histories of the calculus begin with Archimedes, and they highlight the parallels between his discoveries and results that are found today by limits, infinite series, and integration techniques, even going so far as to assert that the differences in approaches may be more in words than in ideas [4]. A student may wonder why, if Archimedes’ discoveries are so novel and modern in style, he is not credited with the discovery of the calculus. Historians award that distinc- tion unequivocally to Newton and Leibniz, who lived nearly two millennia after Archimedes. To investigate whether Archimedes should instead be ac- knowledged as the first mathematician to “do calculus,” we will explore three aspects of his work that are related to the calculus: his mechanical method, which anticipates integration techniques; his quadrature of the parabola, which demonstrates how to handle infinite series; and his investigations into spirals, which involve properties of tangent lines. As a whole, ancient Greek mathematicians banned infinity from their formal demonstrations, because at the time the concept was not grounded on any logical basis. Intuition often failed when considering questions of the infinite and how to divide the continuum, as exemplified by Zeno’s famous paradoxes which, to some, have since been resolved by modern formulations of the calculus [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Steady-State MRI Sequences and RF Pulse Optimization
    Topics in steady-state MRI sequences and RF pulse optimization by Hao Sun A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Electrical Engineering: Systems) in The University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Research Scientist Jon-Fredrik Nielsen, Co-Chair Professor Jeffrey A. Fessler, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Laura Balzano Professor Douglas C. Noll c Hao Sun 2015 All Rights Reserved For my mother, father, grandparents, and Jing Zhu ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could not have done this work without the help and support from many people. First of all, I want to thank my co-advisors Jon-Fredrik Nielsen and Jeffrey A. Fessler. I feel so lucky that I contacted them when I first came to UM without an advisors, and I am deeply thankful that they granted me the opportunity to work in their groups. They provided me great guidance in my PhD life. Both of them are very knowledge- able in their field. Jon is an expert on MRI sequence and scanner programming. He brought me into the intriguing field of MR steady-state sequence, and helped me a lot in experiments. Jeff is an expert on optimization and image reconstruction, and he can always give me helpful answers whenever I have math related questions. They are great advisors not only because of their knowledge but also their attitude toward students. They always showed great interest in my research ideas. They were willing to sit down and discuss every project details with me. They are both rigorous, but always commented my work in positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Atos
    Mathematical Documentation of the objects realized in the visualization program 3D-XplorMath Select the Table Of Contents (TOC) of the desired kind of objects: Table Of Contents of Planar Curves Table Of Contents of Space Curves Surface Organisation Go To Platonics Table of Contents of Conformal Maps Table Of Contents of Fractals ODEs Table Of Contents of Lattice Models Table Of Contents of Soliton Traveling Waves Shepard Tones Homepage of 3D-XPlorMath (3DXM): http://3d-xplormath.org/ Tutorial movies for using 3DXM: http://3d-xplormath.org/Movies/index.html Version November 29, 2020 The Surfaces Are Organized According To their Construction Surfaces may appear under several headings: The Catenoid is an explicitly parametrized, minimal sur- face of revolution. Go To Page 1 Curvature Properties of Surfaces Surfaces of Revolution The Unduloid, a Surface of Constant Mean Curvature Sphere, with Stereographic and Archimedes' Projections TOC of Explicitly Parametrized and Implicit Surfaces Menu of Nonorientable Surfaces in previous collection Menu of Implicit Surfaces in previous collection TOC of Spherical Surfaces (K = 1) TOC of Pseudospherical Surfaces (K = −1) TOC of Minimal Surfaces (H = 0) Ward Solitons Anand-Ward Solitons Voxel Clouds of Electron Densities of Hydrogen Go To Page 1 Planar Curves Go To Page 1 (Click the Names) Circle Ellipse Parabola Hyperbola Conic Sections Kepler Orbits, explaining 1=r-Potential Nephroid of Freeth Sine Curve Pendulum ODE Function Lissajous Plane Curve Catenary Convex Curves from Support Function Tractrix
    [Show full text]
  • Maths Investigation Ideas for A-Level, IB and Gifted GCSE Students
    Maths Investigation Ideas for A-level, IB and Gifted GCSE Students All this content taken from my site at www.ibmathsresources.com – you might find it easier to follow hyperlinks from there. I thought I’d put a selection of the posts I’ve made over the past year into a word document – these are all related to maths investigations or enrichment ideas. Some are suitable for top set students across the year groups, others may only be suitable for sixth form students. However, whatever level you teach there’ll definitely be something of use! 1 Index: Page 3 - 7 More than 100 ideas for investigation/enrichment topics for sixth form maths students Pages 8 – 10 Secondary data resources and suggestions for investigations ideas. Pages 11 - 22 Statistics Topics Premier League Finances, The Mathematics of Bluffing, Does Sacking a Manager Affect Results, Maths in Court, Digit Ratios and Maths Ability, The Birthday Problem Pages 23 - 40 Geometry Topics Circular inversion, Graphically Understanding Complex Roots, Visualising Algebra, The Riemann Sphere, Imagining the 4th Dimension Pages 41 – 49 Modelling Topics Modelling Infections, Real Life Differential Equations, Black Swan Events Pages 50 – 71 Pure Maths and Calculus Fermat’s Theorem on Squares, Euler and e, Divisibility Tests, Chinese Remainder Theorem, Proof and Paradox, War Maths, The Goldbach Conjecture, The Riemann Hypothesis, Twin Primes, Time Travel Pages 72-93 – Games and Codes Tic Tac Toe Game Theory and Evolution Knight’s Tour Maths and Music Synathesia Benford’s Law to catch fraudsters The Game of Life RSA code and the internet, NASA and codes to the stars 2 Maths Exploration Topics: 100+ ideas for investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Coordinate System
    Polar coordinate system From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Polar coordinates) In mathematics, the polar coordinate system is a two- dimensional coordinate system in which points are given by an angle and a distance from a central point known as the pole (equivalent to the origin in the more familiar Cartesian coordinate system). The polar coordinate system is used in many fields, including mathematics, physics, engineering, navigation and robotics. It is especially useful in situations where the relationship between two points is most easily expressed in terms of angles and distance; in the Cartesian coordinate system, such a relationship can only be found through trigonometric formulae. For many types of curves, a polar equation is the simplest means of representation; for some others, it is the only such means. Contents A polar grid with several angles labeled. History See also History of trigonometric functions It is known that the Greeks used the concepts of angle and radius. The astronomer Hipparchus (190-120 BC) tabulated a table of chord functions giving the length of the chord for each angle, and there are references to his using polar coordinates in establishing stellar positions.[1] In On Spirals, Archimedes describes his famous spiral, a function whose radius depends on the angle. The Greek work, however, did not extend to a full coordinate system. There are various accounts of who first introduced polar coordinates as part of a formal coordinate system. The full history of the subject is described in Harvard professor Julian Lowell Coolidge's Origin of Polar Coordinates. [2][3] Grégoire de Saint-Vincent and Bonaventura Cavalieri independently introduced the concepts at about the same time.
    [Show full text]