DOCSLIB.ORG

Travel Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Travel Analysis Report Travel Analysis Report BIGHORN NATIONAL FOREST United States Department of Agriculture Responsible Official: Bill Bass, Forest Supervisor Abstract: This Travel Analysis Report documents a route‐by‐route analysis of all Forest System Roads on the Bighorn National Forest and recommends the minimum Forest Service road system needed for public access and forest management. The project is within the Bighorn National Forest, Wyoming. July 2015 Location: Bighorn National Forest Big Horn, Johnson, Sheridan, and Washakie Counties, Wyoming Portions of Townships 33‐39 North, Ranges 1‐3 East and Ranges 1‐5 West, N.M.P.M. For More Information Contact: Jason Ruybal or Dave McKee Bighorn National Forest 2013 Eastside Second Street Sheridan, WY 82801 307‐674‐2600 [email protected] or [email protected] Version 1.0 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDAs TARGET Center at (202) 720‐2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250‐9410, or call (800) 795‐3272 (voice) or (202)720‐6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Bighorn National Forest Travel Analysis Report Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Summary of Issues 1 Analysis Performed 1 Key Results and Findings 1 How the Report Will Be Used 2 Introduction 2 Travel Management Rule 2 Travel Analysis Process 3 Forest Plan Direction 3 Compliance with Forest Plan Direction 4 Step 1: Setting up the Analysis 4 Purpose 4 Analysis Area 4 Objectives 4 Interdisciplinary Team 5 Core Team 5 Extended Team 5 Analysis Plan 5 Information Needs 6 Step 2: Describing the Situation 7 Purpose 7 Road Management 7 Geographic Information System and Corporate Database 8 Existing Direction 8 Existing Condition 9 Forest Plan Infrastructure Guidelines 10 Step 3: Identifying Issues 11 Purpose 11 Key Issues 11 Step 4: Assessing Benefits, Problems, and Risks 12 Purpose 12 The Analysis Process 12 i Bighorn National Forest Travel Analysis Report Criteria and Rankings Used in the Risk and Benefit Analysis 12 Results of the Risk and Benefit Analysis 16 Step 5: Describing Opportunities and Setting Priorities 18 Purpose 18 Opportunities for Roads 18 Recommendations for Roads 19 Minimum Road System 21 Process Used to Develop the Minimum Road System 22 Bighorn National Forest Minimum Road System 22 Future Actions 24 Appendix A: Excerpts from Current Forest Plan for Management Areas 26 Forestwide General Direction 26 Appendix B: Road Maintenance Costs 37 Appendix C: Risk/Benefit Analysis Rationale and Methodology 41 Risks 41 Benefits 46 Appendix D: Road System Maps 49 Appendix E: Recommended Changes to Roads 52 Appendix F: Risk and Benefit Assessment for Forest Roads. 64 Appendix G: Public Involvement and Comments 124 List of Figures Figure 1. Map of the existing road system on the forest. 49 Figure 2. Map of opportunities to change the road system on the forest. 50 Figure 3. Map of the proposed minimum road system on the forest. 51 List of Tables Table 1. Original system roads data on the Bighorn National Forest. 9 Table 2. Current system roads data on the Bighorn National Forest 9 Table 3: Forest plan infrastructure direction by management area. 10 ii Bighorn National Forest Travel Analysis Report Table 4. Road risks and benefits. 12 Table 5. Road risk guidelines. 13 Table 6. Road benefit guidelines. 14 Table 7. Miles of system roads in each risk/benefit category. 16 Table 8. Mileages of minimum road system compared to existing road system. 22 Table 9. Annual maintenance costs for existing road system. 39 Table 10. Annual maintenance costs for minimum road system. 40 Table 11. Deferred maintenance costs. 40 Table 12. Roads with recommended changes on the Powder River Ranger District. 52 Table 13. Roads with recommended changes on the Medicine Wheel/Paintrock District. 57 Table 14. Roads with recommended changes on the Tongue Ranger District. 61 Table 15. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 1 roads, Powder River Ranger District. 64 Table 16. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 2 roads, Powder River Ranger District. 75 Table 17. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 3 roads, Powder River Ranger District. 83 Table 18. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 4 roads, Powder River Ranger District. 86 Table 19. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 5 roads, Powder Ranger District. 86 Table 20. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 1 roads, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock Ranger District 86 Table 21. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 2 roads, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock Ranger District 93 Table 22. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 3 roads, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock Ranger District 102 Table 23. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 4 roads, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock Ranger District 102 Table 24. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 5 roads, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock Ranger District. 102 Table 25. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 1 roads, Tongue Ranger District. 103 Table 26. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 2 roads, Tongue Ranger District. 110 Table 27. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 3 roads, Tongue Ranger District. 120 Table 28. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 4 roads, Tongue Ranger District. 122 Table 29. Risk/benefit assessment for maintenance level 5 roads, Tongue Ranger District. 122 iii Bighorn National Forest Travel Analysis Report Executive Summary This document is the Travel Analysis Report (TAR) for the Bighorn National Forest planning area. This report documents a route‐by‐route analysis of all national forest system (NFS) roads on the forest and recommends the minimum road system needed for public access and forest management. This report does not address the motorized trail system on the forest. The outcome of the travel analysis is a set of science‐based recommendations for changes to the forest transportation system to meet current and future management objectives. These recommendations are based on an analysis of the physical, biological, social, and economic risks and benefits of every system road. Travel analysis is intended to inform subsequent National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) processes, allowing individual projects to be more site‐specific and focused, while still addressing cumulative impacts. The travel analysis process (TAP) neither produces decisions nor allocates NFS lands for specific purposes. It merely provides the analytical framework from which to make recommendations that may then be examined in the NEPA process. It describes current conditions, risks, benefits, opportunities (needs for change), and priorities for action. Future NEPA analyses that include public involvement may carry forward, reject or change the recommendations in this report, and provide the basis for making specific transportation‐system‐related decisions. Summary of Issues The following issues were identified using previous public involvement and internal Forest Service input. Issues are discussed in more detail in chapter 4. Insufficient resources for maintenance of the existing system of roads. Access needs, including motorized recreation use, access and connectivity to a variety of non‐motorized recreation uses, access for timber management, access for permitted activities such as livestock grazing or recreation residence use, and emergency access. Environmental impacts or risks from motor vehicle use including impacts to water resources, soil erosion and risks from geologic hazards (e.g., landslides), concerns about fragmentation and wildlife security, impacts to vegetation (specifically introduction and spread of noxious weeds), and impacts to cultural resources. Inappropriate jurisdiction. Analysis Performed A risk‐benefit assessment was used to rank system roads on the forest. The categories chosen to rank risks and benefits were based on issues identified in chapter 4 and by the criteria discussed in chapter 5. Criteria were set by the members of the core and extended interdisciplinary teams (IDTs). Key Results and Findings Through the travel analysis process, the IDT ranked routes based on their risks to natural, social, economic, and cultural resources and their benefits to recreation use, stakeholder access, timber 1 Bighorn National Forest Travel Analysis Report management access, and emergency access. Each road was then further evaluated to determine if it was needed as part of the minimum road system. Opportunities for changes to roads were identified. A summary of these findings follows: . 175 miles of roads in the current system have a greater risk than benefit and should be considered for decommissioning, closure, or mitigated to reduce resource risk. 726 miles of roads in the current system have high to medium benefits and should be considered for regular maintenance to mitigate and prevent resource risk. 153 miles of system roads are recommended to be decommissioned
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Directions Medicine Wheel Envisioned for Us by a Female Elder from the Anishnabe Nation
    The Medicine Wheel at the First Nations University of Canada is the Four Directions Medicine Wheel envisioned for us by a female Elder from the Anishnabe Nation. This is but one Medicine Wheel, and since there are many Medicine Wheels, some people may see the wheel differently. For example, there are age Medicine Wheels, tribal Medicine Wheels, wheels for the four sacred plants (cedar, sage, tobacco and sweetgrass), the four seasons, the four aspects of the self (physical, mental, emotional and spiritual), and personal Medicine Wheels. These wheels each have different colours, placements and meanings. The Four Directions Medicine Wheel as shared by a female Elder from the Anishnabe Nation “The Medicine Wheel was placed on Turtle Island by people thousands of years ago. For this Medicine Wheel, I want to honour one of the oldest things we have, which is our four directions. We seek knowledge from those four directions. We get power from those four directions. They pull stuff into our lives. When we call out to them in prayer, they will bring things to us. The four directions came with creation. We didn’t. We were the last thing created. And this is a garden, it’s coming from mother earth, so that’s where the four directions are coming from. When I look at a Four Directions Medicine Wheel, I see yellow in the east, blue in the south, red in the west, white in the north. The sun rises yellow in the east. It’s always going to rise in the east, and it’s always going to set in the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegories of Native America in the Fiction of James Purdy
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MIXEDBLOOD METAPHORS: ALLEGORIES OF NATIVE AMERICA IN THE FICTION OF JAMES PURDY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By MICHAEL E. SNYDER Norman, Oklahoma 2009 MIXEDBLOOD METAPHORS: ALLEGORIES OF NATIVE AMERICA IN THE FICTION OF JAMES PURDY A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH BY Dr. Timothy Murphy, Chair Dr. Ronald Schleifer Dr. Craig Womack Dr. Rita Keresztesi Dr. Julia Ehrhardt © Copyright by MICHAEL E. SNYDER 2009 All Rights Reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to express my gratitude to the following people, without whom I could not have completed this project at all, or in the same way: Profound thanks go to my wife and family for support, inspiration, suggestions, and proofreading help: Lori Anderson Snyder, Mary Lou Anderson, Ivy K. Snyder, Marianna Brown Snyder, E. Eugene Snyder, Christine Hadley Snyder, Timothy D. Snyder, Marci Shore, Philip B. Snyder, and Mary Moore Snyder, in Ohio, Oklahoma, San Diego, and New Haven. Deep thanks for thoughtful conversation, improvisation, edification, guidance, and ideas go to my Chair and mentor, Timothy S. Murphy. A very special debt of gratitude goes to John Uecker of New York City. Special thanks to Dr. Jorma Sjoblom of Ashtabula, Ohio. Special thanks to Parker Sams, of Findlay, Ohio, and the Sams family; and Dorothy Purdy, David Purdy, and Christine Purdy, of Berea, Ohio. Many thanks for much inspiration and education go to Craig S. Womack, currently at Emory University. Special thanks for encouragement and support above and beyond the call of duty go to Julia Ehrhardt in the Honors College at the University of Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2007 to 06/30/2007 Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Aerial Application of Fire - Fuels management In Progress: Expected:07/2007 08/2007 Christopher Wehrli Retardant 215 Comment Period Legal 202-205-1332 EA Notice 07/28/2006 fire [email protected] Description: The Forest Service proposes to continue the aerial application of fire retardant to fight fires on National Forest System lands. An environmental analysis will be conducted to prepare an Environmental Assessment on the proposed action. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/retardant/index.html. Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. Nation Wide. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Northern Rockies Lynx - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:04/2007 04/2007 Ray Smith Amendment - Land management planning DEIS NOA in Federal Register 406-329-3381 EIS 01/16/2004 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 04/2007 Description: Management guidelines for management of Canada Lynx on certain lands under the authority of the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/planning/lynx.html Location: UNIT - Idaho Panhandle National Forest All Units, Clearwater National
    [Show full text]
  • Incident Management Situation Report Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 0530 Mdt National Preparedness Level 5
    INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITUATION REPORT WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2003 - 0530 MDT NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS LEVEL 5 CURRENT SITUATION: Initial attack activity was moderate in the Southern California Area and light in all other Areas. Nationally, 141 new fires were reported. Six new large fires were reported, two in the Northwest Area and one each in the Northern Rockies, Southern California, Northern California and Southern Areas. Two large fires were contained, one each in the Rocky Mountain and Southern California Areas. Very high to extreme fire indices were reported in Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. The U.S. Army Task Force Steel Dragon (2nd Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery Regiment) commanded by LTC Gregory Schultz, at Fort Hood, TX is assigned to the Fish Creek Complex in western Montana. NORTHERN ROCKIES AREA LARGE FIRES: An Area Command Team (Mann) is assigned to manage Blackfoot Lake Complex, Ball Creek, Wedge Canyon, Robert, Middle Fork Complex, Trapper Creek Complex, Crazy Horse, High and Little Salmon Creek Complex. An Area Command Team (Rounsaville) is assigned to manage Lincoln Complex, Winslow, East Complex, Rough Draw Complex, Cathedral Peak Complex, Rathbone and Burnt Ridge/Sheep Camp Complex. An Area Command Team (Ribar) is assigned to manage Cherry Creek Complex, Mineral-Primm/Boles Meadow, Fish Creek Complex, Black Mountain 2, Cooney Ridge and Gold 1. An Area Command Team (Greenhoe) is assigned to manage Sapp, Slim’s Complex, Fiddle, Beaver Lake, Cayuse Lake Complex, and Clear/Nez Fire Use Complex. BLACKFOOT LAKE COMPLEX, Flathead National Forest. A transfer of command from Ferguson’s Type 1 Incident Management Team to Mortier’s Type 1 Incident Management Team will occur today.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–August 2020
    FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–August 2020 Forest Service Washington Office; Fire and Aviation Management; Nationwide Aerial RULES Application of Fire Retardant – 51403 ( Aug 20) Extension of Certain Timber Sale Contracts: Conveyance of Small Tracts – 8180 ( Feb 13) Finding of Substantial Overriding Public Interest – 20984 ( Apr 15) Land Uses; Special Use: Forest Order Closing Areas: Procedures for Operating Plans and Agreements for Powerline Facility Beattie Gulch Trailhead and McConnell Fishing Access North and West of Maintenance and Vegetation Management Within and Abutting the Gardiner, MT to the Discharge of Firearms – 36527 ( Jun 17) Linear Boundary of a Special Use Authorization for a Powerline Facility – 41387 ( Jul 10) Forest Service Handbook 1109.12; Directive System Handbook; Providing Streamlining Processing of Communications Use Applications – 19660 Notice and Opportunity to Comment on Forest Service ( Apr 8) Directives – 2865 ( Jan 16) Land Uses; Special Uses: Forest Service Handbook: Procedures for Operating Plans and Agreements for Powerline Facility Chapter 30 Law Enforcement; Closures of National Forest System Lands to Maintenance and Vegetation Management Within and Abutting the Hunting, Fishing, or Recreational Shooting – 50002 ( Aug 17) Linear Boundary of a Special Use Authorization for a Powerline Operation and Maintenance of Developed Recreation Sites – 41226 ( Jul 9); Facility; Correction – 48475 ( Aug 11) 47944 ( Aug 7) Public Notice and Comment for Forest Service Directives – 2864 ( Jan 16) Forest Service Manual
    [Show full text]
  • This Months KAS Events
    Highlights of the February Sky . 2nd. Last Quarter Moon . 5th. February 2005 Aurigid Meteor Shower (5th-10th) This Months KAS Events . 7th. Mars 0.7° N of Lagoon Nebula, M20 and M21 also nearby First Light A Beginners Guide to Telescopes th . 8 . By Richard Bell New Moon 7:00 pm Friday, February 4 .. 15th. Kalamazoo Area Math & Science Center First Quarter Moon Space Robotics .. 16th. Young Astronomers Moon 1.5° S of the Pleiades, 6:30 pm Tuesday, February 15 best in western states Trinity Reformed church .. 23rd. Full Moon Inside this Newsletter. .. 26th. Zodiacal Light visible in W January Meeting Minutes..................................... p. 2 after evening twilight for next 2 weeks Board Meeting Minutes....................................... p. 2 Observations…………………………........... p. 3 .. 27th. NASA Space Place............................................... p. 4 Jupiter 1.9° S of Moon, best in Young Astronomers…………….…................ p. 5 western states The Book Corner……......................................... p. 6 KAS Officers & Announcements...................... p. 7 Membership Form (Renew NOW).................... p. 8 February Sky Calendar…………....................... p. 9 www.kasonline.org February 2005 Page 2 January Meeting Board Meeting Minutes Minutes As appropriate for a frigid January meeting day, Molly and The KAS board met at 4 pm on 1/9/05 at Trinity Reformed Roger Williams gave a presentation on their trip to Ice- Church (326 W. Cork St.). Present were Richard Bell, land in September, 2004. Beverly Byle, Rich Mather, Robert Havira, Frank Sever- ance, Carol Van Dien, Robert Wade, and Roger Williams. Molly started off the presentation by describing the geol- ogy of the region, which is dominated by black lava, gla- After approval of the agenda, the treasurer’s report was ciers, numerous scenic waterfalls (often with associated examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails and Aboriginal Land Use in the Northern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1992 Trails and Aboriginal land use in the northern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming Steve Platt The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Platt, Steve, "Trails and Aboriginal land use in the northern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming" (1992). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3933. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3933 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial giain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. MontanaUniversity of TRAILS AND ABORIGINAL LAND USE IN THE NORTHERN BIGHORN MOUNTAINS, WYOMING By Steve Piatt B.A. University of Vermont, 1987 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 19-92 Approved by 4— Chair, Board of Examiners Death, Graduate £>c3Tooi 7 is. rtqz Date UMI Number: EP36285 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability in a Native American Context KV DRAFT 12 1 12
    1 The River of Life: Sustainable Practices of Native Americans and Indigenous Peoples Michael E Marchand A dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Kristiina Vogt, Chair Richard Winchell Daniel Vogt Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Environmental and Forest Sciences 2 ©Copyright 2013 Michael E Marchand 3 University of Washington Abstract The River of Life: Sustainable Practices of Native Americans and Indigenous Peoples Michael E Marchand Chair of Supervisory Committee Dr. Kristiina Vogt School of Environmental and Forest Sciences This dissertation examines how Indigenous people have been forced to adapt for survival after exploitation by Colonial powers. It explains how the resultant decision making models of Indigenous people, based on their traditions and culture, have promoted sustainable growth and development more in harmony with ecological systems. In a 1992 address to the United Nations, a Hopi spiritual leader warned of his tribe’s prophecy that stated there are two world views or paths that humankind can take. Path One is based on technology that is separate from natural and spiritual law. This path leads to chaos and destruction. Path Two development remains in harmony with natural law and leads to paradise. Therefore humans, as children of Mother Earth, need to clean up the messes before it is too late and get onto Path Two and live in harmony with natural law. 4 Water is the focus for this dissertation, as it crosses all aspects of life. Rivers, for example, have a dual purpose. They are a source of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 06/10/2021 14:34:02
    Native American Cultural Resource Studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Monograph) Item Type Monograph Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Halmo, David; Olmsted, John; Evans, Michael Publisher Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Download date 06/10/2021 14:34:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/271453 Native American Cultural Resource Studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Michael J. Evans The Research Report Series of the Institute for Social Research is composed of significant reports published at the completion of a research project. These reports are generally prepared by the principal research investigators and are directed to selected users of this information. Research Reports are intended as technical documents which provide rapid dissemination of new knowledge resulting from ISR research. Native American Cultural Resource Studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Michael J. Evans Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 1990 This volume was originally prepared for Science Applications International Corporation of Las Vegas, Nevada (work performed under Contract No. DE- AC08- 87NV10576). Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Unites States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn NF Fire Management Plan 2019
    BIGHORN NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 2015 Sheep Creek Fire, Tongue River Canyon Prepared and Updated by: _/s/ Jon Warder______________________2/14/2020_______ Forest Fire Management Officer Date Note: No changes made from prior years. Bighorn NF Fire Management Plan 2019 Summary The implementation of Spatial Fire Management Planning became policy with the Forest Service in 2016 as documented in the Fire Management Planning Guide (replacing Forest Service Handbook 5109.19), including a Fire Management Reference System (previously the Electronic Reference File) which contains background documents that support fire management planning on the local unit (see attached). This is the latest direction in tiering fire management strategies to the Forest Plan direction, and replaces the designations formerly associated with Fire Management Zones (NFMAS) and Fire Management Units (FPA, manual) in prior years. It is compliant with the 2009 direction in the Guidance for Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. Risk Management and Safety are the overarching principles applied to any fire management strategy and incident objectives, and costs are managed commensurate with risk management and values at risk. The Forest also values its cooperators in fire management, and their input to incident related management is also considered in developing incident objectives, particularly in multi-jurisdictional fires. Additional objectives to consider, with template wording, are included in the large fire planning documents and the WFDSS section included in the reference system. Spatial Information The Bighorn Forest transitioned to Spatial Fire Management by including the following layers in the Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS), beginning April 27th of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 Thru FY2016
    Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 thru FY2016 Benson Teresa FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Briscoe Caren FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Carlson Ann FS Lassen National Forest FY14 Christiansen Donn FS Cleveland National Forest FY14 Donald Michael FS Plumas National Forest FY14 Ewing Rebecca FS Mark Twain National Forest FY14 Gosse Michael FS Ocala National Forest FY14 Herrera Macario FS Allegheny National Forest FY14 Hutchins Michael FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Jackson William FS Green Mountain National Forest FY14 Kelley Keith FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Maercklein Mary FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 McCombs Matthew FS Pisgah National Forest FY14 McCoy Jim FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 Morgan Leslie FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Morris JaSal FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Moynihan Megan FS Ouachita National Forest FY14 Napper Carolyn FS Shasta-Trinity National Forest FY14 Nedlo Jason FS Daniel Boone National Forest FY14 Pentecost Mark FS Superior National Forest FY14 Petersen Brittany FWS Bon Secour NWR FY14 Russell Scott FS Coconino National Forest FY14 Schroyer Karen FS Dixie National Forest FY14 Shinn Jeffrey FS Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests FY14 Skustad Carl FS Superior National Forest FY14 Steele Kurtis FS Superior National Forest FY14 Stresser Susan FS Shoshone National Forest FY14 Walker Erick FS Idaho Panhandle National Forest FY14 Watson Alfred FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Yoshina Dean FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Alfred Roderick FS Inyo National
    [Show full text]