DOCSLIB.ORG

CONNECT Component Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONNECT Component Review CONNECT component review CONNECT component review Date: 4 May 2020 Authors: Gordon Freer and Edward Hedley Submitted by Itad Itad 4 May 2020 CONNECT component review Acknowledgements The review team acknowledges the support of the Connect programme team in providing documentation and helping the team to arrange interviews. The review team also expresses thanks to our field team in conducting interviews and collecting data in the field. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluators. They do not represent those of Connect or of any of the individuals and other organisations referred to in the report. ‘Itad’ and the tri-colour triangles icon are a registered trademark of ITAD Limited. Itad 4 May 2020 i CONNECT component review Contents List of acronyms iii 1. Introduction and scope 1 1.1. CONNECT component background 1 1.2. Review purpose 1 1.3. Review methodology 1 1.4. Review limitations 2 1.5. Structure of the report 2 2. Theoretical framework Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1. The M4P Theory of Change 3 2.2. The CONNECT Theory of Change 4 2.3. Intervention Theories of Change 5 2.4. Commentary on intervention design 6 3. Findings 8 3.1. Relevance 8 3.2. Effectiveness: were the interventions effective in promoting changes to practice? 11 3.3. Impact: did the changes have value for the beneficiaries? 13 3.4. Sustainability: Are the changes likely to be implemented in the future? 15 4. Conclusion 18 5. Lessons and recommendations 19 List of references 21 Table of respondents 22 Annex A: Case study – Belpata Dairy Cooperative 24 Annex B: Case study – Organic Mountain Flavor 29 Annex C: Case study – Unilever Nepal Ltd 34 Annex D: Case study – Hatemalo Seed Promotion Cooperative (HSPC) 38 Itad 4 May 2020 ii CONNECT component review List of acronyms A360 Adolescents 360 BDC Belpata Dairy Cooperative DAC Development Assistance Committee DFID Department for International Development FGD Focus Group Discussion IP Implementing Partner KII Key Informant Interview LRN Local Road Network M4P Making Markets Work for the Poor MSMEs Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises OMF Organic Mountain Flavor RAP3 Nepal Rural Access Programme Phase 3 SED Social and Economic Development SHF Smallholder Farmer TOC Theory of Change YV Yuva Vayu Itad 4 May 2020 iii CONNECT component review 1. Introduction and scope CONNECT is a component part of the Nepal Rural Access Programme Phase 3 (RAP3), one of the longest- standing and largest Department for International Development (DFID) programmes in western Nepal (Provinces 6, or Karnali Province, and Province 7). It is well recognised and accepted that new roads and connectivity alone will not be a sufficient kick-start or generate economic activity along transport and economic corridors. To address this, a subcomponent of RAP (and the forerunner to CONNECT), the Social and Economic Development (SED) programme, provided direct agricultural inputs (e.g. seeds, fertilisers) and training to targeted members of communities (direct beneficiaries) residing by or close to RAP roads to develop small agribusinesses. The SED component was closed and reviewed in 2015. It was reconceptualised as CONNECT, with an aim to reduce poverty by increasing incomes and resilience through jobs, local roads, social protection support, market links to agribusiness and women-led micro-enterprises and small community infrastructure in 10 districts in the provinces. To this end, CONNECT applied Making Markets Work for the Poor (M4P) thinking in its interventions’ conceptualisation and design. 1.1. CONNECT component background CONNECT as a component of the larger programme works with micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Provinces 6 and 7 by facilitates linkages between them and other market players to support and harness available commercial opportunities in agriculture. The programme also seeks to ensure Nepal’s local governments have capacity to tackle the challenges impeding growth, hindering geographical and socio-economic inclusion and limiting resilience. CONNECT initially had nine interventions, of which it chose to continue to work with four, ‘graduating’ or exiting from supporting the remainder.1 This report focuses only on the remaining four interventions. 1.2. Review purpose This report reviews the purpose and process of the CONNECT component of RAP3 with a view to identifying what has worked well and where improvements might be made in future programmes. The CONNECT component applied an M4P approach in designing and implementing its interventions. DFID requested that the review explore the extent to which CONNECT had successfully applied this approach. 1.3. Review methodology The CONNECT review used a theory-based approach to assess the intentions, outcomes and impact of the programme. Given the budgetary and time limitations, we gathered only qualitative data from a series of interviews with programme staff, partners and beneficiaries. We sampled four of the nine interventions,2 doing this by gathering the information through both semi-structured key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with stakeholders and presenting the findings in case studies. The review was conducted in two phases: ▪ In the first phase, the team examined programme documentation and conducted some KIIs with programme staff to review the rationale and decision-making process followed by the programme. We focused specifically on the programme choice to concentrate support on a smaller number of interventions while determining that other interventions had ‘graduated’. The results of this phase 1 The first phase of this review commented on this selection process (Itad, CONNECT Review, 1st Phase, August 2018). 2 The interventions were purposively selected based on their potential for comparison with the Samarth evaluation and for lesson-learning. We also limited our selection to interventions the programme had chosen to continue to support, because of the more readily available data. Itad 4 May 2020 1 CONNECT component review were presented to the programme, which was given an opportunity to respond. The short report containing the results was presented to DFID.3 ▪ The purpose of the second phase was to ascertain the viability of the programme Theory of Change (TOC) and its outcomes and impact. For this phase, we reviewed a wider set of programme documentation and conducted interviews with programme staff and beneficiaries and staff of partner organisations. 1.4. Review limitations There are several limitations to this review, mainly to do with budgetary and time constraints. We did not verify or attempt to verify any of the quantitative evidence the programme presented, and do not at any point venture an opinion as to this area. We gathered evidence in the second phase only on the four interventions that CONNECT continued to support until the end of the programme. As such, the lessons learnt and recommendations draw only on this limited review. While we were able to interview programme staff and conduct field research with beneficiaries of all four evaluated interventions, interviews at the support market level and with Implementing Partners (IPs) proved difficult. As a result, analysis of changes and impact at the support market level is less extensive than anticipated. In the original scope of work, we identified that we would not examine Efficiency as a Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criterion, although we proposed that we would conduct a ‘high-level’ Value for Money review. We did not have sight of the financial data from the programme, and so were not able to conduct this review. We were not required to review the progress of the project against the project logframe and therefore do not speak to this in the review. 1.5. Structure of the report This report has four sections: ▪ Section 1 provides a background to CONNECT and the review process, including the methodology used and its limitations. ▪ To provide a framework for the later presentation of findings and analysis, Section 2 provides the M4P TOC, as well as the CONNECT TOC, and collectively outlines the four case study interventions’ aims and objectives. We also provide a commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of intervention design. ▪ Section 3 presents the findings of the review, organised by DAC criteria. Under each criterion we draw on evidence presented in the four case studies annexed to this report. We first summarise how the interventions were intending to work and then provide our analysis of the underlying factors that explain why the four interventions succeeded or failed, organised by the DAC criteria. ▪ In Section 4 we draw our conclusions. ▪ Section 5 provides lessons and recommendations and draws comparisons with the review team’s recent evaluation of DFID’s Samarth programme, the first M4P programme implemented in Nepal. The stand-alone case studies of the four reviewed interventions are included as annexes.4 For the sake of completeness, the Phase 1 Report of this review is also included as an annex. 3 Itad, CONNECT Review (1st Phase), August 2018 4 Annex A is Dairy, Annex B is Ginger, Annex C is Hamri Didis and Annex D is Seed. Itad 4 May 2020 2 CONNECT component review 2. Theoretical framework This review serves as an input into assessing the extent to which CONNECT has been able to successfully apply the M4P approach (see Box 1) in the design and roll-out of its interventions. As such, this section describes a generic M4P TOC, the CONNECT TOC and the intervention-specific TOCs.5 This section provides the framework for the analysis presented in Section 4. The section ends with a brief tabular description of the rationale and aims of each of the four reviewed interventions. TOCs for programmes of this nature act as frameworks or roadmaps for the potential path that the programme anticipates taking. Regular review of the theories allows for a programme to update this framework to reflect progress or additional unanticipated barriers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PAHAL) Program
    Promoting Agriculture, Health and Alternative Livelihoods (PAHAL) Program Cooperative Agreement No.: AID-OAA-15-00001 Quarterly Report III (Q3, FY15) 1 April – 30 June, 2015 Submitted to: USAID Nepal Submitted by: Mercy Corps ACRONYMS COP – Chief of Party DCOP – Deputy Chief of Party GESI – Gender and Social Inclusion GoN – Government of Nepal iDE – International Development Enterprises innovATE – Innovation for Agricultural training and Education IPTT – Indicator Performance Tracking Table KISAN – Knowledge-based Integrated Sustainable Agriculture and Nutrition MC – Mercy Corps MoAD – Ministry of Agricultural Development MoFALD – Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoHA – Ministry of Home Affairs MoHP – Ministry of Health and Population NGO – Non-Governmental Organization NNFSS – National Nutrition and Food Security Secretariat NPAC – National Advisory Committee Meeting NPC – National Planning Council PAHAL – Promoting Agriculture, Health and Alternative Livelihoods SABAL – Sustainable action for Resilience and Food Security STRESS – Strategic Resilience Assessment SUAAHARA – ‘Good Nutrition’ TSU – Technical Support Unit (Mercy Corps) VDC – Village Development Committee PAHAL Program Overview The PAHAL Program, funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance (DCHA)/Office of Food for Peace (FFP), is a five-year program that commenced in October, 2014. It seeks to strengthen livelihoods, improve nutritional status and increase the capacity of vulnerable households to mitigate, adapt to and recover from shocks and stresses in communities with deep poverty and high rates of malnutrition in critical zones of the Far-Western and Mid-Western Regions of Nepal. In recent years Nepal has made substantial strides toward reducing its overall poverty rate. However, many people in the Middle Hill and Mountain zones of western Nepal continue to struggle with the root causes of food insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • 44214-024: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds In
    Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (RRP NEP 44214) Environmental Assessment and Review Framework ADB TA 7883-NEP July 2013 Nepal: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Prepared by Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management for the Asian Development Bank CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 December 2012) Currency unit – Nepalese Rupee (NR) NR1.00 = $0.0115 $1.00 = NR 86.9 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CDG – Community Development Group CFUG – Community Forest User Group CPC – Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) DAGs – disadvantaged groups DDR – Due Diligence Reports DFO – District Forestry Office DSCO – District Soil Conservation Office DSCWM – Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management DSO – DSCO Safeguard Officer DSS – District Safeguard Specialist EARF – Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment GESI – Gender Empowerment and Social Inclusion (Plan) GON – Government of Nepal GPP – Grievance Point Person IEE – Initial Environmental Examination MoFSC – Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation NAPA – National Adaptation Program of Action NES – National Environmental Specialist PIC – Project Implementation Consultant PMU – Project Management Unit REA – Rapid Environmental Assessment R/LAP – Resettlement and Land Acquisition Plan SPCR – Strategic Program for Climate Resilience SEU – Social and Environmental Unit SWMC – Sub-watershed Management Committee VDC – Village Development Committee VDT – Village Development Team WEIGHTS AND MEASURES cm – centimeter cu m – cubic meters Ha hectare km – kilometer L – liter m – meter masl – meters above sea level sq m square meter NOTE (i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental assessment and review framework is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
    Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: the Maoists’ Conflict and Impact on the Rights of the Child
    Asian Centre for Human Rights C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058, India Phone/Fax: +91-11-25620583; 25503624; Website: www.achrweb.org; Email: [email protected] Embargoed for: 20 May 2005 Nepal: The Maoists’ conflict and impact on the rights of the child An alternate report to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on Nepal’s 2nd periodic report (CRC/CRC/C/65/Add.30) Geneva, Switzerland Nepal: The Maoists’ conflict and impact on the rights of the child 2 Contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................. 5 III. GENERAL PRINCIPLES .............................................................................. 15 ARTICLE 2: NON-DISCRIMINATION ......................................................................... 15 ARTICLE 6: THE RIGHT TO LIFE, SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT .......................... 17 IV. CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS............................................................ 17 ARTICLE 7: NAME AND NATIONALITY ..................................................................... 17 Case 1: The denial of the right to citizenship to the Badi children. ......................... 18 Case 2: The denial of the right to nationality to Sikh people ................................... 18 Case 3: Deprivation of citizenship to Madhesi community ...................................... 18 Case 4: Deprivation of citizenship right to Raju Pariyar........................................
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of Women and Children Service Centers
    60 61 Government of Nepal Phone : 00977-1-4420541 MINISTRY OF HOME Fax : 00977-1-4412602 POLICE HEAD QUARTERS E-mail : [email protected] Crime Investigation Department Kathmandu, Nepal Message from the Project Director It is indeed a pleasure for me to bring out the progress report of JFPR 9135-NEP Project for the second consecutive period. It has been a very challenging work to run this project amid diff erent diffi culties and hurdles. Never the less the project teams carried it throughout in an extremely excellent manner. I appreciate the hard work put together by the core team and the teams of fi ve district offi ce including WCSC District Network Committees. Th ey put up a great deal of hard work to eff ective implementation of the project for achieving good results. Th e project work thus has come to a successful conclusion for the second year, July 2013 according to its targeted projection. Joint eff orts of the team and stake holders must be commended and on behalf of Criminal Investigation Department and Nepal Police Organization, I would like to thank all those for their meaningful contribution to this project. Th e project is proceeding towards its designated goals and it has started to show positive outcomes at the community level within short period. Given the positive outlook, I strongly believe that the project will run effi ciently and reach to the successful conclusion. I am sure that the Core team of the project, including Project Manager/ DIGP Ms Bimala Th apa, along with the teams of District Police Offi ce and WCSC District Network Committee will continue to contribute to the work of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Dailekh Mapping Study on Governance and Coherence
    Dailekh Mapping Study: Governance and Coherence in one District April 2015 Mary Hobley and Dermot Shields With Krishna Acharya and Dharma Bhattarai Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1 Approach ............................................................................................................. 14 1.2 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 15 2. Framework for mapping ............................................................................................. 18 2.1 Structures ............................................................................................................. 18 2.1.1 Core Ministries ......................................................................................................... 18 2.1.2 Sub-national organisation and structure ................................................................. 19 2.1.3 Sector ministries ...................................................................................................... 20 2.2 Key concepts ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation
    Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation Karnali Province Government Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Surkhet, Nepal Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation Karnali Province Government Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Surkhet, Nepal Copyright: © 2020 Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment, Karnali Province Government, Surkhet, Nepal The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Ministry of Tourism, Forest and Environment, Karnali Province Government, Surkhet, Nepal Editors: Krishna Prasad Acharya, PhD and Prakash K. Paudel, PhD Technical Team: Achyut Tiwari, PhD, Jiban Poudel, PhD, Kiran Thapa Magar, Yogendra Poudel, Sher Bahadur Shrestha, Rajendra Basukala, Sher Bahadur Rokaya, Himalaya Saud, Niraj Shrestha, Tejendra Rawal Production Editors: Prakash Basnet and Anju Chaudhary Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Acharya, K. P., Paudel, P. K. (2020). Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation. Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment, Karnali Province Government, Surkhet, Nepal Cover photograph: Tibetan wild ass in Limi valley © Tashi R. Ghale Keywords: biodiversity, conservation, Karnali province, people-wildlife nexus, biodiversity profile Editors’ Note Gyau Khola Valley, Upper Humla © Geraldine Werhahn This book “Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation”, is prepared to consolidate existing knowledge about the state of biodiversity in Karnali province. The book presents interrelated dynamics of society, physical environment, flora and fauna that have implications for biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Nepal Education Project, 2010 to 2015
    An Evaluation of the Nepal Education Project, 2010 to 2015 Jagannath Adhikari Thomas Robertson September 21, 2015 1 Executive Summary Introduction This is an end of the project evaluation of ‘Nepal Education Project' implemented between 2010 and 2015 in 10 districts in Nepal by Anti-Slavery International, Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC), and Backward Society Education (BASE). The project was aimed at ending the cycle of labour exploitation by facilitating access to education and skills training for children of former and current Kamaiya and Haliya bonded labourers in Nepal. Kamaiya are generally landless Tharu agricultural laborers who, unlike regular tenants, fall into debt to their landlords and work to repay the debt. In the worst cases, the debt is passed on from generation to generation. In the early 2000s, there were roughly 19,000 Kamaiya families. The Haliya of far-western Nepal are agricultural labourers, generally illiterate untouchable dalits, who have become trapped in debt and caste obligations to higher caste landlords. Despite significant recent changes, the Haliya--like all dalits in the mid West and far West--often face very harsh caste-based social discrimination: they are denied education, government services, and face poor treatment wherever they go. In the early 2000s, there were approximately 17,000 Haliya families. Both the Kamaiya and the Haliya have benefitted from freedom movements during the last two decades, led by NGOs and the people themselves. After many years of grassroots organizing and political lobbying (led in part by one of the partners for this project, the Backward Society of Nepal or BASE), in July 2000 the government declared freedom for Kamaiyas.
    [Show full text]
  • S.N Local Government Bodies EN स्थानीय तहको नाम NP District
    S.N Local Government Bodies_EN थानीय तहको नाम_NP District LGB_Type Province Website 1 Fungling Municipality फु ङलिङ नगरपालिका Taplejung Municipality 1 phunglingmun.gov.np 2 Aathrai Triveni Rural Municipality आठराई त्रिवेणी गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 aathraitribenimun.gov.np 3 Sidingwa Rural Municipality लिदिङ्वा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 sidingbamun.gov.np 4 Faktanglung Rural Municipality फक्ताङिुङ गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 phaktanglungmun.gov.np 5 Mikhwakhola Rural Municipality लि啍वाखोिा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 mikwakholamun.gov.np 6 Meringden Rural Municipality िेररङिेन गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 meringdenmun.gov.np 7 Maiwakhola Rural Municipality िैवाखोिा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 maiwakholamun.gov.np 8 Yangworak Rural Municipality याङवरक गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 yangwarakmuntaplejung.gov.np 9 Sirijunga Rural Municipality लिरीजङ्घा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 sirijanghamun.gov.np 10 Fidhim Municipality दफदिि नगरपालिका Panchthar Municipality 1 phidimmun.gov.np 11 Falelung Rural Municipality फािेिुुंग गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 phalelungmun.gov.np 12 Falgunanda Rural Municipality फा쥍गुनन्ि गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 phalgunandamun.gov.np 13 Hilihang Rural Municipality दिलििाङ गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 hilihangmun.gov.np 14 Kumyayek Rural Municipality कु म्िायक गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 kummayakmun.gov.np 15 Miklajung Rural Municipality लि啍िाजुङ गाउँपालिका
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Red Cross Society National Headquarters Disaster Management Department
    Nepal Red Cross Society National Headquarters Disaster Management Department Total Affected Districts 8 Name of Districts Kailali, Kanchanpur, Bardiya, Gulmi, Dadeldhura, Salyan, Dang, Doti Type of disaster Flood and Landslides Date of Occurrence 19 September, 2008 Update no 4 Date of Update 26 September, 2008 1. General Overview Torrential rain fall starting from Sept 19 has triggered the flood and landslides in different districts of the country and has claimed a total of 40 lives, several others sustained injured and 4 went missing. According to NRCS Kailali district chapter, a total of 15 people killed alone in Kailali district and 28 went missing. At least 16,000 houses of 39 VDCs and 2 municipalities have been affected including 15,019 displaced families in Kailali District. Out of which, Tikapur Municipality, Lalbhoji, Pratappur, Naryanpur, Dhansingpur, Ramshikarjhala are most affected VDC. The displaced people are taking shelters in school, public buildings and relatives. The police, army, local people and NRCS volunteers have been mobilized for the rescue operation. Likewise, the flood and landslides have badly hit the Kanchanpur and Bardeya districts. A total of 10 dead bodies have been recovered in Kanchanpur District. The flood triggered by the Mahakali River has affected a total of 5500 houses in 2, 11,12,12,15 wards of Mahendranagar municipality. A total of 17 VDCs have been affected in Kanchanpur district. Out of which, Mahendranagar Municipality, Rampur Bilaspur, Parasan, Rautali Bichuwa, Krishnapur, Dhodhara, Dekath Bhuly and Sankarpur VDCs have been badly affected. Similarly, in Bardeya district, a total of 32 VDCs have been affected by the flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnali Province Tourism Master Plan 2076/77 - 2085/86 BS (2020/21-2029/30)
    Karnali Province Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Surkhet, Nepal Karnali Province Tourism Master Plan 2076/77 - 2085/86 BS (2020/21-2029/30) January 2020 i Karnali Province Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment (MoITFE) Surkhet, Nepal, 2020 KARNALI PROVINCE TOURISM MASTER PLAN 2076/77 - 2085/086 BS (2020/21-2029/30) Technical Assistance WWF Nepal, Kathmandu Office, Nepal Consulting Services Mountain Heritage, Kathmandu, Nepal Advisors Hon. Nanda Singh Budha : Minister; Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment/Karnali Province Dr. Krishna Prasad Acharya : Secretary; Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment/Karnali Province Mr. Dhirendra Pradhan : Ex- Secretary; Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment/Karnali Province Dr. Ghana Shyam Gurung : Country Representative, WWF Nepal Mr. Santosh Mani Nepal : Senior Director, WWF Nepal Focal Persons Ms. Anju Chaudhary : MoITFE/Karnali Province Mr. Eak Raj Sigdel : WWF Nepal Planning Expert Team Members Ms. Lisa Choegyel : Senior Tourism Marketing Advisor Mr. Ram Chandra Sedai : Team Leader/Tourism Expert Dr. Roshan Sherchan : Biodiversity Expert Mr. Jailab K. Rai : Socio-Economist and Gender Specialist Er. Krishna Gautam : Environmental Engineer Mr. Harihar Neupane : Institutional and Governance Expert Mr. Yuba Raj Lama : Culture Expert Cover Photo Credit Ram C.Sedai (All, except mentioned as other's), Bharat Bandhu Thapa (Halji Gomba & Ribo Bumpa Gomba), Chhewang N. Lama (Saipal Base Camp), Dr. Deependra Rokaya (Kailash View Dwar), www.welcometorukum.org (Kham Magar), Google Search (Snow Leopard, Musk Deer, Patal Waterfall, Red Panda). ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Consultant Team would like to acknowledge following institutions and individuals for their meaningful contribution towards the formulation of Karnali Province Tourism Development Master Plan.
    [Show full text]