Part Ii Religion Assimilating the Law Catholic Church Law: Challenges
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 7 (2021) 95–124 brill.com/jrat Part Ii Religion Assimilating the Law ∵ Catholic Church Law: Challenges by Secular Law and Religious Pluralism Burkhard Josef Berkmann Holder of the Chair of Canon Law, in particular for Theological Foundations of Canon Law, General Norms and Constitutional Law as well as for Oriental Canon Law, Klaus Mörsdorf-Studium für Kanonistik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany [email protected] Abstract This article examines the challenges which arise for Catholic canon law from the col- lision with secular law and the law of other religious communities. It begins by look- ing at the conditions provided by canon law itself in order to meet these challenges. Subsequently it addresses the specific challenges posed by secular law, especially human rights, and its general influence. Finally, it discusses the challenges posed by religious pluralism, first clarifying the church’s legal relationship with other religious communities and then addressing the very specific question of why church law also applies to non-members in certain cases. The conclusion is that catholic canon law is better equipped to face the current challenges than other religious laws. Nevertheless, there are fruitful tensions and inevitable breaks. © Burkhard Josef Berkmann, 2021 | doi:10.30965/23642807-BJA10009 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license. from Brill.com09/25/2021 11:22:21AM via free access 96 Berkmann Keywords church and human rights – non-Catholics – non-Christians – divine law – legal norms – moral norms – legal sanctions 1 Challenges for Canon Law This article examines the challenges which arise for Catholic canon law from the collision with secular law and the law of other religious communities. It begins by looking at the conditions provided by canon law itself in order to meet these challenges. The next two sections cover the specific challenges posed by secular law, especially human rights, and its general influence. Two further sections discuss the challenges posed by religious pluralism; the first of these sections will clarify the church’s legal relationship with other religious communities, the second one will address the very specific question of why church law also applies to non-members in certain cases. In the end it will be necessary to examine whether canon law is sufficiently equipped to deal with the current challenges. 2 Principles of Catholic Canon Law Church law is the internal legal order of a church by which it regulates its own affairs. The scope of regulation primarily covers the organisational structure, offices and governing bodies, the legal status of the faithful, the proclamation of faith, the celebration of services, asset management, (criminal-) sanctions and litigation. The law of the Catholic Church is codified to a large extent. The “Code of Canon Law” (CIC) of 1983 applies to the Latin (Western) Church, while the “Code of the Canons of the Oriental Churches” (CCEO) of 1990 applies to the Eastern Catholic Churches. 2.1 Transcendent Foundations and Distinctions between Revealed Law and Human Legislation A certain scepticism about the law is evident in some passages of the New Testament. Redemption may certainly not be expected from mere fulfilment of the law. On the other hand, the existence of a legal system within the church is not simply owed to the necessity of an organisational order or to expedi- ency, but it is in fact theologically justified. Just as, according to the Christian doctrine of faith, Jesus Christ is both true God and true man (incarnation), the DownloadedJRAT from 7 Brill.com09/25/2021(2021) 95–124 11:22:21AM via free access Catholic Church Law 97 divine and the human elements merge into a single complex reality within the church as well.1 The church is therefore not only a spiritual community which would defy legal regulation, but also a visible assembly which, like every human society, needs a legal order. Considering this theological justification, it is debatable whether church law can be called law only in an analogous sense or in a literal one as well.2 In the ecclesiastical legal system, the distinction between divine and man- made law is presupposed. Divine law is based on a divine origin, whether it was given by God as an order to his creation and can be perceived by the light of natural reason (natural law), or whether it was communicated by God to human beings by revelation and is recognised in faith (positive divine law).3 Divine law is considered to be unchangeable and universally valid. The largest part of church law, however, is man-made law, which has its roots in human legislation within the church and can be adapted to local and temporal circumstances. 2.2 Legal and Moral Norms In the Catholic sphere, a distinction is made between morality and law. Church law only governs relations between legal subjects, while the relationship between God and man is not directly within its scope of regulation. There are, however, interfaces where moral norms become relevant in church law, and the codes of law even contain moral norms in cases where they form a context of meaning with legal ones. Müller demonstrated this by referring to the duty to strive for holiness4 and the duty to seek the truth.5 Both are mere moral duties but they are enshrined in the CIC (c. 210 or c. 748 § 1) because they are connected with genuinely legal duties and claims. In particular, individu- als have the legal right to access the truth, for example, the right to hear the gospel, while the ecclesiastical authorities have the legal duty to not hinder their access and to provide the necessary means, for example by preaching the gospel.6 The difference between legal and moral norms becomes more appar- ent in canon law than in the legal systems of many other religious communi- ties but is less distinct here than in state law. However, even secular law is never fully separated from other types of norms, as is evident from the importance of 1 Cf. Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentium, Art. 8. 2 Cf. Müller, Rechtscharakter, p. 9. 3 Cf. Weber, Art. Ius divinum – Ius humanum, p. 436. 4 Cf. Müller, Streben nach Heiligkeit, pp. 468–480. 5 Cf. Müller, Zum Glauben verpflichtet?, p. 402 et seq. 6 Cf. Berkmann, Nichtchristen, p. 230. JRAT 7 (2021) 95–124 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 11:22:21AM via free access 98 Berkmann public morality (“gute Sitten”) in private law, codes of ethics in commercial law or the decision of conscience in conscientious objection to military service. 2.3 Worldly (Temporal) or Eschatological Justice? The distinction between moral and legal norms is also reflected in sanctions. Kelsen distinguishes between the moral order and the religious order: the former remains completely without sanctions, while the latter imposes tran- scendent ones. But even so, it does not yet become a legal order characterised by sanctions to be imposed by a human authority.7 The reason why religious law has legal character is not found in the fact that it would entail transcen- dent sanctions but rather that it would entail sanctions in this world which are provided for by law and imposed or ascertained in due legal process. This is precisely the case in canon law. Anyone who misses the appeal deadline of c. 1630 § 1 CIC does not need to expect eternal damnation but rejection of the appeal by the ecclesiastical judge. An impotent person will not ‘go to hell’ for this reason but, according to c. 1084 CIC, cannot marry or may have to expect his or her marriage to be invalidated by an ecclesiastical tribunal. The various penalties generally consist of the deprivation of individual rights under canon law and are intended to protect the church community as well as to cause offenders to make amends. Legal norms differ from moral ones in the fact that they are not binding on the conscience, but as a result of external sanctions imposed in due legal process. This is true for state law as well as for canon law, which is why we can speak of law in its proper sense. However, ‘external sanc- tions’ must not be reduced to physical force. Such a view, often attributed to Kelsen, is nowadays no longer generally proposed. Especially when one was to compare different laws, the definition of law must not be to narrow.8 2.4 Distinction from Secular Law The distinction between secular and religious law is a fundamental principle within Christianity. The saying of Jesus Christ: “Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God!” (Matt 22:21) already contains this separation.9 In the first three centuries of Christianity, an ecclesiastical legal order already developed, but there were no Christian rulers yet. The law of the 7 Cf. Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre, p. 28 et seq. 8 Donlan and Heckendorn Urscheler therefore suggest a functional definition of law. At the centre of this definition are two functions of law. The first consists in “establishing a rational conceptual framework that allows solving all cases according to a consistent pattern”. The second function “consists in the regulation of conduct and in the conflict resolution through institutionalized authority”, cf. Donlan and Heckendorn Urscheler, Concepts, p. 9. 9 Cf. Ferrari, Spirito, p. 239. DownloadedJRAT from 7 Brill.com09/25/2021(2021) 95–124 11:22:21AM via free access Catholic Church Law 99 early church was therefore always different from state law. Even in later times, disregarding the degree of closeness and intertwining of church and state, it was always clear that these were two different areas of law.