DOCSLIB.ORG

Detection of a Type Iin Supernova in Optical Follow-Up Observations of Icecube Neutrino Events Magellan Workshop, 17–18 March 2016, DESY Hamburg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detection of a Type Iin Supernova in Optical Follow-Up Observations of Icecube Neutrino Events Magellan Workshop, 17–18 March 2016, DESY Hamburg Detection of a Type IIn Supernova in Optical Follow-Up Observations of IceCube Neutrino Events Magellan Workshop, 17{18 March 2016, DESY Hamburg Markus Voge, Nora Linn Strotjohann, Alexander Stasik 17 March 2016 Target: transient sources (< 100 s • neutrino burst): GRBs (Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase • & Nagataki 2006) SNe with jets (Razzaque, Meszaros, • Waxman 2005) More exotic phenomena? E.g. Fast • Radio Bursts (FRBs)? (Falcke & Rezzolla 2013) Online Neutrino Analysis Automatic search for interesting IceCube neutrino events • Realtime alerts sent to follow-up instruments • Multi-messenger: Combination with other data fruitful • Follow-up ensures access to data • 2 / 15 Online Neutrino Analysis Automatic search for interesting IceCube neutrino events • Realtime alerts sent to follow-up instruments • Multi-messenger: Combination with other data fruitful • Follow-up ensures access to data • Target: transient sources (< 100 s • neutrino burst): GRBs (Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase • & Nagataki 2006) SNe with jets (Razzaque, Meszaros, • Waxman 2005) More exotic phenomena? E.g. Fast • Radio Bursts (FRBs)? (Falcke & Rezzolla 2013) 2 / 15 The OFU and XFU system SN/GRB PTF (optical) Swift (X-ray) Alerts Alerts Madison/Bonn Iridium IceCube arXiv: 1309.6979 (p.40) 3 / 15 Online analysis scheme neutrino purity At least 8 coincident Trigger Level 0:0001% hits 2000 Hz ∼ Basic muon event se- Level 1 35 Hz 0:01% lection (tracks only) ∼ Up-going tracks Level 2 2 Hz 0:1% ∼ Neutrino selection OFU Level 3 mHz 90% (BDT) ∼ Neutrino multiplet ( 2ν): ≥ Time ∆T < 100s Space ∆Ψ < 3:5◦ PTF Calculate λ Swift 4 / 15 OFU/XFU: Measured multiplets and alerts Season Doublets Triplets PTF Alerts Swift alerts IC40 (08/09) 15 (8.6) 0 (0.003) | | IC59 (09/10) 29 (26.0) 0 (0.008) | | IC79 (10/11) 20 (27.1) 0 (0.008) 10 (6.4) 1 (1.0) IC86{1 (11/12) 49 (44.0) 0 (0.018) 8 (5.7) 6 (5.2) IC86{2 (12/13) 73 (64.2) 0 (0.028) 7 (7.8) 7 (7.1) IC86{3 (13/14) 72 (66.8) 0 (0.025) 5 (5.3) 4 (4.7) Sum 258 (236.7) 0 (0.09) 30 (25.2) 18 (17.9) Table: Multiplets and alerts of the Optical and X-ray Follow-Up (in brackets number of expected background alerts). 5 / 15 IceCube's first supernova 19.0 event 1 18.5 event 2 Alert from 2012-03-30: mean ν • 18.0 SN location Most significant neutrino ] PTF FoV • ◦ doublet to date: ∆T = 1:8 s, 17.5 00 01 02 03 04 05 ∆Ψ = 1:3 ◦ 17.0 SN PTF12csy found in PTF Declination [ • 16.5 images, very close to 06 07 08 09 10 11 neutrinos (0:2◦) 16.0 Late-time IIn SN, z = 0:068, • 15.5 300 Mpc 103.0 103.5 104.0 104.5 105.0 105.5 106.0 106.5 107.0 ∼ Right Ascension [◦] (arXiv:1506.03115) 6 / 15 IceCube's first supernova NEW REF 10" 10" SUB SDSS 10" 7 / 15 IceCube's first supernova 19.0 False alarm rate of neutrino event 1 • 1 18.5 event 2 alert alone: 0:2 yr− mean ν ∼ 18.0 SN location ] PTF FoV Chance probability (p-value) for ◦ • neutrino alert alone within DAQ 17.5 00 01 02 03 04 05 season: 12:7 % 17.0 Declination [ 16.5 06 07 08 09 10 11 16.0 SN explosion not coincident with neutrinos15.5 within a priori • 103.0 103.5 104.0 104.5 105.0 105.5 106.0 106.5 107.0 window of 5 days Right Ascension [ ] ± ◦ A posteriori probability for neutrino alert + any CCSN • detection, within neutrino error radius, within 300 Mpc: 1:4 % (2:2σ) Not significant considered coincidental • ) 8 / 15 Schematic picture of SNe IIn CSM eruption(s) before explosion Actual SN explosion CSM CSM ejecta Star SN shocks (Source: arXiv:1311.6778) 9 / 15 PTF12csy: spectrum Rest frame wavelength [A]˚ 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 3 10 z = 0.068 δ β α Ne III H O III H O III N II Na I D H He I OI 2 γ 10 O II H H He I He I He I He I N II S II OI Sky Sky ⊕ ⊕ 1 Gemini N (175 d) 100 10 × 100 [a.u.] λ F 1 10− Keck I (454 d) 1 × 2 10− 3 10− 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Observed wavelength [A]˚ Narrow emission lines on broad base (from ejecta-CSM interaction) • Resembles SN 2010jl spectrum (SN IIn with signs of particle acceleration) • 10 / 15 PTF12csy: light curve Explosion time 22 • − unknown: between Ni decay g 21 r 351 and 158 days − 2006gy (R) i before neutrino alert 20 z − 2010jl (V) Maximum (r-band) y • 19 perhaps about − 20 mag (comparison 18 with− 2010jl) − 17 latest super-luminous, − non-detection • ) Absolute magnitude light curve powered 16 − ν alert by interaction of SN Gemini N Keck ejecta with dense 15 − circumstellar medium 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 − − (CSM) Days since first detection (rest frame) 11 / 15 PTF12csy: host galaxy Very faint dwarf galaxy SDSS • J065832.82+171541.6 Redshift z = 0:068 determined • with O II and O III lines in late SN spectrum Host galaxy absolute magnitude • Mg 16:2 mag (fainter than Small≈ Magellanic− Cloud with MV = 16:9 mag) − Quite metal-poor • (12 + log O=H 8) ≈ Superluminous SNe IIn occur • frequently in subluminous, low-metallicity galaxies 12 / 15 PTF12csy: expected neutrino production 1 Model A Model by Murase et al. Model B (RS) • 0 Model B (FS) (arXiv:1012.2834): ejecta-CSM ]) -2 interaction leads to shocks -1 -2 [GeV cm accelerating particles (protons) ν φ -3 2 ν Neutrinos from pp interaction -4 log(E • -5 Expect at most 0.01 IceCube • -6 events within 100 1000 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 log(E [GeV]) days (SN far away,∼ 300− Mpc) ν Neutrino doublet within 2 sec, > 158 days (rest frame) after • SN explosion? Very unlikely that neutrinos and SN were correlated • (unless:) blitzar (Fast Radio Burst)?) 13 / 15 Result: • Null-result: fitted n of 0 • s Upper limits: 1500 Murase model A, 1300 Murase • model B fluence.∼ × ∼ × Nevertheless: complementary neutrino search Search for neutrinos over longer 1 − • 2 time scale (full year from May 2011 − ]) 2 3 to May 2012) − − 4 − Used Optical-Follow-Up dataset 5 • [GeV cm − ν φ 6 2 Std. neutrino point source ν − E Murase et al. (2011): • ( 7 − likelihood analysis with space and 10 8 Model A log − Model B - RS energy term: 9 − Model B - FS 10 Y ns ns − 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (ns ) = Si +(1 )Bi (1) log (Eν [GeV]) L N − N 10 i Signal hypothesis: E 2 spectrum with cut-off at 1 PeV • − 14 / 15 Nevertheless: complementary neutrino search Search for neutrinos over longer 1 − • 2 time scale (full year from May 2011 − ]) 2 3 to May 2012) − − 4 − Used Optical-Follow-Up dataset 5 • [GeV cm − ν φ 6 2 Std. neutrino point source ν − E Murase et al. (2011): • ( 7 − likelihood analysis with space and 10 8 Model A log − Model B - RS energy term: 9 − Model B - FS 10 Y ns ns − 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (ns ) = Si +(1 )Bi (1) log (Eν [GeV]) L N − N 10 i Signal hypothesis: E 2 spectrum with cut-off at 1 PeV • − Result: • Null-result: fitted n of 0 • s Upper limits: 1500 Murase model A, 1300 Murase • model B fluence.∼ × ∼ × 14 / 15 Summary IceCube's most significant neutrino doublet led to discovery of • a rare superluminous SN IIn Far away (300 Mpc) and old (160 days), correlation with • neutrinos unlikely No long term neutrino signal found in IceCube data • Interaction of ejecta with dense CSM • Particle acceleration and neutrino production likely, but at • undetectable luminosity See arXiv:1506.03115 for more detailed information • 15 / 15 Backup slides 16 / 15 Palomar Transient Factory Located in California • Mainly discovering/observing • SNe FoV: 2:3 3:5 • ◦ × ◦ 1.2 m telescope • Lim. mag. of up to 21 • Can take spectra for interesting • source candidates Follow-up since Aug. 2010 • 10 alerts per year • ∼ 17 / 15 Swift 10 ks exposure with XRT • (0:2 keV to 10 keV), more intensive follow-up (up to 2 weeks) possible Need `tiling' because of small • FoV ( 0:4 ) ∼ ◦ Follow-up since February 2011 • 7 alerts per year • ∼ 18 / 15 OFU test statistic λ 102 101 ] 1 100 − 1 10− 2 − FAR [yr 10 3 10− 4 10− 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 − − Test statistic value λ Test statistic λ (score value) • ∆Ψ2 λ = + 2 ln(2πσ2) σ2 q q (2) 2 θA ∆T 2 ln 1 exp 2 + 2 ln − − −2σw 100 s 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 σq = σ1 + σ2 and σw = 1/σ1 + 1/σ2 − • 19 / 15 PTF12csy: SED around day 177 1039 ] 1.8 × 1 − u ˚ A 1.6 From black body fit: 1 B • − 1.4 T = (7160 270) K, Lbol = b ± 42 1 1.2 g (5:53 1:18) 10 erg s− ± × 1.0 r (continuum emission) R 15 ) 0.8 Rphot = 1:7 10 cm i × Adding contribution from 0.6 • 0.4 spectral lines Hα,Hβ: Lbol = 42 1 0.2 (6:4 1:2) 10 erg s− ± × Differential Luminosity [erg0 s .0 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 900010000 Observed Wavelength [A]˚ Using light curve to extrapolate: total radiated energy of • 50 Ebol = 2:1 10 erg within 400 days after first detection (SN 2008iy: 2 ×1050 erg, 2010jl: 4 1050 erg) Lower limit× on E , L , R ×(neglected explosion to first • bol bol phot detection, X-ray, γ-ray) 20 / 15 PTF12csy: X-rays Observations on 2012-04-20 and • 2012-11-14.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • One Or Several Populations of Fast Radio Burst Sources?
    One or several populations of fast radio burst sources? M. Caleb1, L. G. Spitler2 & B. W. Stappers1 1Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany. arXiv:1811.00360v1 [astro-ph.HE] 1 Nov 2018 1 To date, one repeating and many apparently non-repeating fast radio bursts have been de- tected. This dichotomy has driven discussions about whether fast radio bursts stem from a single population of sources or two or more different populations. Here we present the arguments for and against. The field of fast radio bursts (FRBs) has increasingly gained momentum over the last decade. Overall, the FRBs discovered to date show a remarkable diversity of observed properties (see ref 1, http://frbcat.org and Fig. 1). Intrinsic properties that tell us something about the source itself, such as polarization and burst profile shape, as well as extrinsic properties that tell us something about the source’s environment, such as the magnitude of Faraday rotation and multi-path propagation effects, do not yet present a coherent picture. Perhaps the most striking difference is between FRB 121102, the sole repeating FRB2, and the more than 60 FRBs that have so far not been seen to repeat. The observed dichotomy suggests that we should consider the existence of multiple source populations, but it does not yet require it. Most FRBs to date have been discovered with single-pixel telescopes with relatively large angular resolutions. As a result, the non-repeating FRBs have typically been localized to no bet- ter than a few to tens of arcminutes on the sky (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of Frbs
    Credit: Swinburne in Fast Radio Burst detection detection Burst FastRadio in Strategic uses of single dishes (and GB) (and singledishes uses of Strategic DuncanLorimer, Dept. Physics and of Astronomy, WestVirginia University FRB lowdown • 21 published so far • Flux > 0.5 Jy @ 1.4 GHz • Pulse widths > few ms • Highly dispersed • Weakly scattered • One FRB so far repeats! • Few arcmin localization • One counterpart so far • ~few x 1000/day/sky Credit: Thornton et al. (2013) What might FRBs probe? • New/exciting physics • Cosmological NS census? • Non-stellar origin? • Fundamental tests? • The intergalactic medium • Electron content → missing baryons? • Magnetic field || to line of sight • Cosmology • Rulers • DM halos, DM/DE parameterization Single-pulse search pipeline DM Cordes & McLaughlin (2003) Credit: Spitler et al. (2014) 2014: FRB 121102 at Arecibo at FRB 121102 2014: Credit: Masui et al. (2015) 2015: FRB 110523 at GBT at FRB 110523 2015: • More “theories” than bursts! • Colliding compact objects (e.g. NS-NS) • Supernovae • Collapsing NS → BH (blitzar) • Black hole absorbing NSs • Giant pulses from pulsars/magnetars • Neutron star – asteroid belt interaction • More exotic (strange) star interactions • Galactic Flare Stars • Light sails from ET • Dark matter • Cosmic strings • White holes No! Maybe? No! → → → or maybesomethingor else? … … 2016: FRB 121102 repeats! 121102 FRB 2016: Credit: Spitler et al. and Scholz et al. (2016) 2017: FRB 121102 localized! Credit: NRAO Credit: Chatterjee et al. (2017) z = 0.19 (2.3 billion yr) We
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with Icecube
    Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with IceCube Donglian Xu Samuel Fahey, Justin Vandenbroucke and Ali Kheirandish for the IceCube Collaboration TeV Particle Astrophysics (TeVPA) 2017 August 7 - 11, 2017 | Columbus, Ohio Fast Radio Bursts - Discovery in 2007 2 e2 Lorimer et al.,Science 318 (5851): 777-780 2 ∆tdelay = 3 DM w− 2⇡mec · · 24 2 =1.5 10− s DM w− ⇥ · · 3 DM = n dl = 375 1cm− pc e ± Z “very compact” SMC J0045−7042 (70) J0111−7131 (76) J0113−7220 (125) “extragalactic”? J0045−7319 (105) J0131−7310 (205) Figure 2: Frequency evolution and integrated pulse shape of!the radio burst.4 The.8 survey0.4 data, collected on 2001δ Augusttwidth 24, are=4 shown. here6 ms as a two-dimensio ( nal ‘waterfall)− plot’± of intensity as a function of radio frequency versus time. The dispersion1.4GHzis clearly seen as a quadratic sweep across the frequency band, with broadening towards lower frequencies. From a measurement of the pulse delay across the receiver band using standard pulsar timing techniques, we determine the DM to be 375 dtI1 cm−3!pc. The two150 white lines50Jy separated byms 15 ms @ that 1 bound.4 GHz the pulse show the expected behavior± for the' cold-plasma dispersion± law assuming a DM of 375 cm−3 pc. The horizontal line at 1.34 GHz is an artifact in the data caused by a malfunctioning frequency Z ∼ channel. This plot is for one of the offset beams in which the digitizers were not saturated. By splitting the data into four frequency sub-bands we have measured both the half-power Galactic DM: pulse width• andA fluxtotal density spectrumof ~ over23 the observingFRBs bandwidth.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Star Collapse Times, Gamma-Ray Bursts and Fast Radio Bursts
    MNRAS 441, 2433–2439 (2014) doi:10.1093/mnras/stu720 The birth of black holes: neutron star collapse times, gamma-ray bursts and fast radio bursts ‹ Vikram Ravi1,2 and Paul D. Lasky1 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/441/3/2433/1126394 by California Institute of Technology user on 24 June 2019 1School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia 2CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia Accepted 2014 April 8. Received 2014 April 7; in original form 2013 November 29 ABSTRACT Recent observations of short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) suggest that binary neutron star (NS) mergers can create highly magnetized, millisecond NSs. Sharp cut-offs in X-ray afterglow plateaus of some SGRBs hint at the gravitational collapse of these remnant NSs to black holes. The collapse of such ‘supramassive’ NSs also describes the blitzar model, a leading candidate for the progenitors of fast radio bursts (FRBs). The observation of an FRB associated with an SGRB would provide compelling evidence for the blitzar model and the binary NS merger scenario of SGRBs, and lead to interesting constraints on the NS equation of state. We predict the collapse times of supramassive NSs created in binary NS mergers, finding that such stars collapse ∼10–4.4 × 104 s (95 per cent confidence) after the merger. This directly impacts observations targeting NS remnants of binary NS mergers, providing the optimal window for high time resolution radio and X-ray follow-up of SGRBs and gravitational wave bursts.
    [Show full text]
  • 81 EMBARGOED UNTILLTHURSDAY JULY 4 20:00 CET Nijmegen, July 2, 2013 Farewell Greeting from a Dying Star
    PB 2012 - 81 EMBARGOED UNTILLTHURSDAY JULY 4 20:00 CET Nijmegen, July 2, 2013 Farewell greeting from a dying star – Scientists suggest explanation for mysterious radio flashes Mysterious bright radio flashes that appear for only a brief moment on the sky and do not repeat could be the final farewell greetings of a massive star collapsing into a black hole, astronomers from Nijmegen and Potsdam argue. Radio telescopes have picked up some bright radio flashes that appear for only a brief moment on the sky and do not repeat. Scientists have since wondered what causes these unusual radio signals. An article in this week’s issue of ‘Science’ suggests that the source of the flashes lies deep in the early cosmos, and that the short radio burst are extremely bright. However, the question of which cosmic event could produce such a bright radio emission in such a short time remained unanswered. The astrophysicists Heino Falcke from Radboud University Nijmegen and Luciano Rezzolla from the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam provide a solution for the riddle. They propose that the radio bursts could be the final farewell greetings of a supramassive rotating neutron star collapsing into a black hole. Spinning star withstands collapse Neutron stars are the ultra-dense remains of a star that has undergone a supernova explosion. They are the size of a small city but have up to two times the mass of our Sun. However, there is an upper limit on how massive neutron stars can become. If they are formed above a critical mass of more than two solar masses, they are expected to collapse immediately into a black hole.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Radio Bursts
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Fast radio bursts Petroff, E.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Lorimer, D.R. DOI 10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 Publication date 2019 Document Version Final published version Published in Astronomy and Astrophysics Review License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T., & Lorimer, D. R. (2019). Fast radio bursts. Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 27(1), [4]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:03 Oct 2021 The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (2019) 27:4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 REVIEW ARTICLE Fast radio bursts E. Petroff1,2 · J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of Frbs
    Credit: Swinburne Fast Radio Bursts : The Story SoStory Far... Bursts: The Fast Radio DuncanLorimer, Dept. Physics and of Astronomy, WestVirginia University Credit: Joeri van Leeuwen Phinney & Taylor (1979) Credit: Aurore Simonet “...the next few decades will undoubtedly bring about a greater understanding of radio-bursting objects, including Crab-like pulsars in other galaxies, counterparts to high-energy bursting sources, and other classes of objects that are yet to be discovered.” Rotating Radio Transients (RRATs) Credit: Froney Crawford Credit: ATNF Credit: Credit: Maura McLaughlin Credit: fas.org End up with a search over “DM” a search upwith End Single-pulse search pipeline DM Cordes & McLaughlin (2003) An unexpected signal! An unexpected signal! Interference Questions: * Why so bright? * Why no weaker events? * Detectable in other surveys? Even my own wife begins to doubt... “Moreover, the lack of highly dispersed celestial signals is the evidence that the Lorimer burst is unlikely to belong to a cosmological source population.” DM = 746 pc/cc 746 = DM ms W=8 eane et al. 2011/2012 Credit: K but then, in 2012, alongcame then,in2012, this but The burst is also consistent with the radio signal theorised … from an annihilatingfrom mini black hole.” “ … more good news followed in 2013 • Lorimer bursts? • Sparkers? • FARTS? • FRBs Cosmological redshift Cosmological redshift Credit: Thornton et al. (2013) DM delay in FRB 110220 FRB in delay DM Energy and redshift estimates Credit: Spitler et al. (2014) 2014: an FRB atArecibo an 2014: • Credit: Masui et al. (2015) 2015: an FRB atGBT an 2015: • Credit: Masui et al. (2015) 2015: an FRB atGBT an 2015: Scattering andScattering scintillation seen! • Credit: Petroff et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title THE DETECTION of A SN IIn in OPTICAL FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS of ICECUBE NEUTRINO EVENTS Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9m60266f Journal Astrophysical Journal, 811(1) ISSN 0004-637X Authors Aartsen, MG Abraham, K Ackermann, M et al. Publication Date 2015-09-20 DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/52 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PREPRINT ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 01/23/15 DETECTION OF A TYPE IIN SUPERNOVA IN OPTICAL FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS OF ICECUBE NEUTRINO EVENTS M. G. AARTSEN1, K. ABRAHAM2, M. ACKERMANN3, J. ADAMS4, J. A. AGUILAR5, M. AHLERS6, M. AHRENS7, D. ALTMANN8, T. ANDERSON9, M. ARCHINGER10, C. ARGUELLES6, T. C. ARLEN9, J. AUFFENBERG11, X. BAI12, S. W. BARWICK13, V. BAUM10, R. BAY14, J. J. BEATTY15,16, J. BECKER TJUS17, K.-H. BECKER18, E. BEISER6, S. BENZVI6, P. BERGHAUS3, D. BERLEY19, E. BERNARDINI3, A. BERNHARD2, D. Z. BESSON20, G. BINDER21,14, D. BINDIG18, M. BISSOK11, E. BLAUFUSS19, J. BLUMENTHAL11, D. J. BOERSMA22, C. BOHM7, M. BORNER¨ 23, F. BOS17, D. BOSE24, S. BOSER¨ 10, O. BOTNER22, J. BRAUN6, L. BRAYEUR25, H.-P. BRETZ3, A. M. BROWN4, N. BUZINSKY26, J. CASEY27, M. CASIER25, E. CHEUNG19, D. CHIRKIN6, A. CHRISTOV28, B. CHRISTY19, K. CLARK29, L. CLASSEN8, S. COENDERS2, D. F. COWEN9,30, A. H. CRUZ SILVA3, J. DAUGHHETEE27, J. C. DAVIS15, M. DAY6, J. P. A. M. DE ANDRE´ 31, C. DE CLERCQ25, H. DEMBINSKI32, S. DE RIDDER33, P. DESIATI6, K. D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Companions on Stellar Evolution
    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA) © Astronomical Society of Australia 2016; published by Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/pas.2016.xxx. The impact of companions on stellar evolution Orsola De Marco1,2 & Robert G. Izzard3 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 2Astronomy, Astrophysics and Astrophotonics Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 3Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, United Kingdom. Abstract Stellar astrophysicists are increasingly taking into account the effects of orbiting companions on stellar evolution. New discoveries, many thanks to systematic time-domain surveys, have underlined the importance of binary star interactions to a range of astrophysical events, including some that were previously interpreted as due uniquely to single stellar evolution. Here, we review classical binary phenomena, such as type Ia supernovae and discuss new phenomena, such as intermediate luminosity transients, gravitational wave-producing double black holes, or the in- teraction between stars and their planets. Finally, we examine the reassessment of well-known phenomena in light of interpretations that include both single stars and binary interactions, for example supernovae of type Ib and Ic or luminous blue variables. At the same time we contextualise the new discoveries within the framework and nomen- clature of the corpus of knowledge on binary stellar evolution. The last decade has heralded an era
    [Show full text]
  • The Arecibo Fast Radio Burst: Dense Circum-Burst Medium S
    Draft of July 25, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE ARECIBO FAST RADIO BURST: DENSE CIRCUM-BURST MEDIUM S. R. Kulkarni1, E. O. Ofek2 & J. D. Neill3 Draft of July 25, 2018 ABSTRACT The nature of fast radio bursts (FRB) showing a single dispersed few-ms-width pulse, with dispersion measure (DM) in excess of the Galactic value has been extensively debated. Here we investigate FRB 121102, the first FRB detected at the 305-m Arecibo radio telescope and remarkable for its unusually large spectral index. After extensive explorations of options we conclude that the spectral index is caused by a nebula with free-free absorption. Observations (or lack thereof) show that the nebula is located beyond the Milky Way. We conclude that FRBs are of extra-galactic origin and that they arise in dense star-forming regions. The challenge with extra-galactic models is the the high volumetric rate of FRBs. This high rate allows us to eliminate all forms of catastrophic stellar death as a progenitor. Hyper-giant flares from young magnetars emerge as the most likely progenitors. A number of consequences follow from this hypothesis: (i) FRB models which posit a purely intergalactic origin can be safely ignored. (ii) The rich ISM environment of young magnetars can result in significant contribution to DM, Rotation Measure (RM) and in some cases to significant free-free optical depth. (iii) The star-forming regions in the host galaxies can contribute significantly to the DM. Including this contribution reduces the inferred distances to FRBs and correspondingly increases the volumetric rate of FRBs (and, in turn, may require that giant flares can also produce FRBs).
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Radio Bursts
    The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (2019) 27:4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 REVIEW ARTICLE Fast radio bursts E. Petroff1,2 · J. W. T. Hessels1,2 · D. R. Lorimer3,4 Received: 30 November 2018 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract The discovery of radio pulsars over a half century ago was a seminal moment in astron- omy. It demonstrated the existence of neutron stars, gave a powerful observational tool to study them, and has allowed us to probe strong gravity, dense matter, and the inter- stellar medium. More recently, pulsar surveys have led to the serendipitous discovery of fast radio bursts (FRBs). While FRBs appear similar to the individual pulses from pulsars, their large dispersive delays suggest that they originate from far outside the Milky Way and hence are many orders-of-magnitude more luminous. While most FRBs appear to be one-off, perhaps cataclysmic events, two sources are now known to repeat and thus clearly have a longer lived central engine. Beyond understanding how they are created, there is also the prospect of using FRBs—as with pulsars—to probe the extremes of the Universe as well as the otherwise invisible intervening medium. Such studies will be aided by the high-implied all-sky event rate: there is a detectable FRB roughly once every minute occurring somewhere on the sky. The fact that less than a hundred FRB sources have been discovered in the last decade is largely due to the small fields-of-view of current radio telescopes. A new generation of wide-field instru- ments is now coming online, however, and these will be capable of detecting multiple FRBs per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Radio Bursts: the Last Sign of Supramassive Neutron Stars
    A&A 562, A137 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321996 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Fast radio bursts: the last sign of supramassive neutron stars Heino Falcke1;2;3 and Luciano Rezzolla4;5 1 Department of Astrophysics, Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 ASTRON, Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD Dwingeloo, The Netherlands 3 Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany 4 Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik, Albert-Einstein-Institut, 14476 Potsdam, Germany 5 Institut für Theoretische Physik, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Received 30 May 2013 / Accepted 20 January 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Several fast radio bursts have been discovered recently, showing a bright, highly dispersed millisecond radio pulse. The pulses do not repeat and are not associated with a known pulsar or gamma-ray burst. The high dispersion suggests sources at cosmo- logical distances, hence implying an extremely high radio luminosity, far larger than the power of single pulses from a pulsar. Aims. We suggest that a fast radio burst represents the final signal of a supramassive rotating neutron star that collapses to a black hole due to magnetic braking. The neutron star is initially above the critical mass for non-rotating models and is supported by rapid rotation. As magnetic braking constantly reduces the spin, the neutron star will suddenly collapse to a black hole several thousand to million years after its birth. Methods. We discuss several formation scenarios for supramassive neutron stars and estimate the possible observational signatures making use of the results of recent numerical general-relativistic calculations.
    [Show full text]