DOCSLIB.ORG

Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with Icecube

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with Icecube Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with IceCube Donglian Xu Samuel Fahey, Justin Vandenbroucke and Ali Kheirandish for the IceCube Collaboration TeV Particle Astrophysics (TeVPA) 2017 August 7 - 11, 2017 | Columbus, Ohio Fast Radio Bursts - Discovery in 2007 2 e2 Lorimer et al.,Science 318 (5851): 777-780 2 ∆tdelay = 3 DM w− 2⇡mec · · 24 2 =1.5 10− s DM w− ⇥ · · 3 DM = n dl = 375 1cm− pc e ± Z “very compact” SMC J0045−7042 (70) J0111−7131 (76) J0113−7220 (125) “extragalactic”? J0045−7319 (105) J0131−7310 (205) Figure 2: Frequency evolution and integrated pulse shape of!the radio burst.4 The.8 survey0.4 data, collected on 2001δ Augusttwidth 24, are=4 shown. here6 ms as a two-dimensio ( nal ‘waterfall)− plot’± of intensity as a function of radio frequency versus time. The dispersion1.4GHzis clearly seen as a quadratic sweep across the frequency band, with broadening towards lower frequencies. From a measurement of the pulse delay across the receiver band using standard pulsar timing techniques, we determine the DM to be 375 dtI1 cm−3!pc. The two150 white lines50Jy separated byms 15 ms @ that 1 bound.4 GHz the pulse show the expected behavior± for the' cold-plasma dispersion± law assuming a DM of 375 cm−3 pc. The horizontal line at 1.34 GHz is an artifact in the data caused by a malfunctioning frequency Z ∼ channel. This plot is for one of the offset beams in which the digitizers were not saturated. By splitting the data into four frequency sub-bands we have measured both the half-power Galactic DM: pulse width• andA fluxtotal density spectrumof ~ over23 the observingFRBs bandwidth. detected Accounting for pulse to date. 3 broadening due to known instrumental effects, we determine afrequencyscalingrelationship 25cm− pc for the observed width W =4.6ms(f/1.4GHz)−4.8±0.4,wheref is the observing frequency. Apower-lawfittothemeanfluxdensitiesobtainedineachsub-Estimated FRB eventband yieldsrate a spectral is index ~1,000/day of 4 1.Inset:thetotal-powersignalafteradispersivedelaycorrection assuming a DM of 375 cm− −±3 pc and a reference frequency of 1.5165 GHz. The time axis on theinnerfigurealsospans the range 0–500 ms. Figure 1: Multi-wavelength image of the field surrounding theburst.Thegrayscaleand Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos12 from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus contours respectively show Hα and HI emission associated with the SMC (8, 9). Crosses mark the positions of the five known radio pulsars in the SMC and are annotated with their names and DMs in parentheses in units of cm−3 pc. The open circles show the positions of each of the 13 beams in the survey pointing of diameter equal to the half-power width. The strongest detection saturated the single-bit digitizers in the data acquisitionsystem,indicatingthatitsS/N 23. Its location is marked with a square at right ascension 01h 18m 06s and declination 75≫◦ 12′ ′′ − 19 (J2000 coordinates). The other two detections (with S/Ns of 14 and 21) are marked with smaller circles. The saturation makes the true position difficult to localize accurately. Based on the half-power width of the multibeam system, the positional uncertainty is nominally 7′. However, the true position is probably slightly ( few arcmin) north-west of this position given± the non-detection of the burst in the other beams.∼ 11 Fast Radio Bursts Emitting Neutrinos? 3 • Blitzar “Cataclysmic” [H. Falcke and L. Rezzolla, A&A 562, A137 (2014)] • Binary neutron star merger [T. Totani, Pub. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 65, L12 (2013)] • Evaporating primordial black holes [Halzen et al., PRD 1995] “MeV neutrinos” • Magnetar/SGRs hyperflares [S. B. Popov and K. A. Postnov, arXiv:1307.4924] [Halzen et al. (2005) astro-ph/0503348] “TeV neutrinos”? this work Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Goal: detecting TeV-PeV astrophysical neutrinos Construction completed in December 2010 IceCube Detector 4 Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | Jan. 29, 2017 MartinMartin Rongen Rongen LakeLake Baikal Baikal 5 Martin Rongen Neutrino Signatures in IceCube SeptemberSeptember 2016 2016 EventEvent signaturessignatures Lake Baikal Event signatures September 2016 (1) Track: charged current νμ ChargedCharged current current νμ ν Charged current ν • <1o Angular resolution μ μ ● ● Factor ~2 energy resolution ●FactorFactor ~2 ~2 energy energy resolution resolution Factor ~ 2 energy ● <1° angular resolution • ● <1° angular resolution resolution ● <1° angular resolution data 2013 Neutral current, Charged current νe (2) Cascade / Shower: all Neutral current, Charged current ν ● 15% resolution on the Neutral current, Charged currente ν deposited energy neutral current, charged e ● 15% resolution on the ● ● 10° angular resolution current νe, low-E charged deposited15% resolution energy on the (above 100 TeV) deposited energy current ντ ● 10° angular resolution ● (above10° angular 100 TeV) resolution Double Bang ν • 10o Angular resolution (above 100 TeV) τ above100 TeV data ● Vertex seperation ~50m/PeV ● Not yet observed Double Bang ντ • 15% energy resolution on “high degeneracy”Double Bang ν τ 4 deposited energy ● Vertex seperation ~50m/PeV ● Vertex seperation ~50m/PeV IceCube has detected a diffuse astrophysical● Not yet neutrinoobserved flux, but no TeV neutrino point sources have● beenNot yet observedidentified to date. 4 Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus 4 All Sky Fast Radio Bursts with IceCube Coverage 6 • Burst times cover IceCube data taking seasons from 2010 to 2015 (6 years) • A total of 29 FRBs (11 unique locations). Repeated bursts are treated as unique bursts in space & time FRB121102 repeated 26 times (17 times within our data sample) North South Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Event Samples & Background Modeling 7 Background PDF derived from North South off-time data (DEC >= -5o) (DEC < -5o) 842,597 events 379,261 events (collected from (collected from 2011-2015) 2010-2014) dominated by dominated by atmospheric atmospheric neutrinos muons A total of 1.2 million events in 6 years 2015 ApJ 805 L5 ApJ 845 (2017), 1, 14 Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Analysis Method: Unbinned Maximum Likelihood 8 The likelihood for observing N events with properties x i for ( n s + n b ) { } expected number of events is: (n + n )N N L(N, x ; n + n )= s b exp( (n + n )) P (x ) { i} s b N! · − s b · i i=1 Y The normalized probability of observing event i is P ( x i ) : nsS(xi)+nbB(xi) Si = Stime(ti) Sspace(~xi) P (xi)= · ns + nb B = B (t ) B (~x ) i time i · space i “temporal” + “spatial” L(N, x ; n + n ) T := ln { i} s b L0(N, xi ; nb) N nˆ S { } T := nˆ + ln(1 + s i ) − s <n >B i=1 b i X Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Search Strategy 9 • Stacking “Distributed fluence test” Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 STACKING declination r.a • Max-burst ‣ Model independent “Single bright neutrino source test” ‣ Expanding time windows Source 3 centered at burst times Source 1 Source 2 ‣ 25 time windows from 10 ms to 2 days, expanding as i declination 2 x10 ms (i =0, …, 24) r.a Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Sensitivity & Discovery Potentials - Stacking 10 North South 2 2 2 2 E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. 3 3 3 3 E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. ) ) IceCube Preliminary 2 2 − IceCube Preliminary − 100 1 10− 2 10 1 − 10− F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm 2 F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm 2 E E 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 ∆ T(s) ∆T(s) ‣25 time windows from 10 ms to 2 days, expanding as 2ix10 ms (i =0, …, 24) ‣One coincident event can be discovery in the short time windows Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Sensitivity & Discovery Potentials - Max-burst 11 North South 2 2 2 2 E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. 3 3 3 3 E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. E− sensitivity E− 5σ disc. poten. IceCube Preliminary ) ) 2 2 − − IceCube Preliminary 1 10− 100 2 10− F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm 2 F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm E 2 E 1 10− 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 ∆ T(s) ∆T(s) ‣25 time windows from 10 ms to 2 days, expanding as 2ix10 ms (i =0, …, 24) ‣One coincident event can be discovery in the short time windows Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Results - Most Significant Bursts & Events 12 North Max-burst South Max-burst Most significant time window: Most significant time window: ∆T = 655.36 s ∆T = 167772.16 s Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Results - Upper Limits 13 North Stacking North Max-burst 2 2 2 2 E− sensitivity E− upper limit E− sensitivity E− upper limit 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 E− sensitivity E− upper limit E− sensitivity E− upper limit 3 3 3 3 E− sensitivity E− upper limit E− sensitivity E− upper limit ) IceCube Preliminary ) IceCube Preliminary 2 2 − ∆T = 655.36 s − ∆T = 655.36 s 1 10 1 10− − 2 2 10− 10− F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm 2 2 E E 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 ∆ T(s) ∆ T(s) Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus Results - Upper Limits 14 South Stacking South Max-burst 2 2 2 2 E− sensitivity E− upper limit E− sensitivity E− upper limit 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 E− sensitivity E− upper limit E− sensitivity E− upper limit 3 3 3 3 E− sensitivity E− upper limit E− sensitivity E− upper limit ) ) IceCube Preliminary 2 0 IceCube Preliminary 2 10 − − 1 10− F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm F @ 100 TeV (GeV cm 2 2 E E 1 10− 2 10− 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 2 10 1 100 101 102 103 104 105 10− 10− 10 10 10 10 10 10 − − ∆ ∆T(s) T(s) Donglian Xu | High-E Neutrinos from Fast Radio Bursts | TeVPA2017, Columbus 2 crete sources has been found, either in searches for clus- tiple muons produced in the same extensive air shower).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf/44/4/905/5386708/44-4-905.Pdf
    MI-TH-214 INT-PUB-21-004 Axions: From Magnetars and Neutron Star Mergers to Beam Dumps and BECs Jean-François Fortin∗ Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d’Optique, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada Huai-Ke Guoy and Kuver Sinhaz Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA Steven P. Harrisx Institute for Nuclear Theory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Doojin Kim{ Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA Chen Sun∗∗ School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel (Dated: February 26, 2021) We review topics in searches for axion-like-particles (ALPs), covering material that is complemen- tary to other recent reviews. The first half of our review covers ALPs in the extreme environments of neutron star cores, the magnetospheres of highly magnetized neutron stars (magnetars), and in neu- tron star mergers. The focus is on possible signals of ALPs in the photon spectrum of neutron stars and gravitational wave/electromagnetic signals from neutron star mergers. We then review recent developments in laboratory-produced ALP searches, focusing mainly on accelerator-based facilities including beam-dump type experiments and collider experiments. We provide a general-purpose discussion of the ALP search pipeline from production to detection, in steps, and our discussion is straightforwardly applicable to most beam-dump type and reactor experiments. We end with a selective look at the rapidly developing field of ultralight dark matter, specifically the formation of Bose-Einstein Condensates (BECs).
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetars: Explosive Neutron Stars with Extreme Magnetic Fields
    Magnetars: explosive neutron stars with extreme magnetic fields Nanda Rea Institute of Space Sciences, CSIC-IEEC, Barcelona 1 How magnetars are discovered? Soft Gamma Repeaters Bright X-ray pulsars with 0.5-10keV spectra modelled by a thermal plus a non-thermal component Anomalous X-ray Pulsars Bright X-ray transients! Transients No more distinction between Anomalous X-ray Pulsars, Soft Gamma Repeaters, and transient magnetars: all showing all kind of magnetars-like activity. Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC Magnetars general properties 33 36 Swift-XRT COMPTEL • X-ray pulsars Lx ~ 10 -10 erg/s INTEGRAL • strong soft and hard X-ray emission Fermi-LAT • short X/gamma-ray flares and long outbursts (Kuiper et al. 2004; Abdo et al. 2010) • pulsed fractions ranging from ~2-80 % • rotating with periods of ~0.3-12s • period derivatives of ~10-14-10-11 s/s • magnetic fields of ~1013-1015 Gauss (Israel et al. 2010) • glitches and timing noise (Camilo et al. 2006) • faint infrared/optical emission (K~20; sometimes pulsed and transient) • transient radio pulsed emission (see Woods & Thompson 2006, Mereghetti 2008, Rea & Esposito 2011 for a review) Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC How magnetar persistent emission is believed to work? • Magnetars have magnetic fields twisted up, inside and outside the star. • The surface of a young magnetar is so hot that it glows brightly in X-rays. • Magnetar magnetospheres are filled by charged particles trapped in the twisted field lines, interacting with the surface thermal emission through resonant cyclotron scattering. (Thompson, Lyutikov & Kulkarni 2002; Fernandez & Thompson 2008; Nobili, Turolla & Zane 2008a,b; Rea et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(INTEGRAL 2010)091
    A candidate former companion star to the Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216 in the massive Galactic cluster Westerlund 1 PoS(INTEGRAL 2010)091 P.J. Kavanagh 1 School of Physical Sciences and NCPST, Dublin City University Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] E.J.A. Meurs School of Cosmic Physics, DIAS, and School of Physical Sciences, DCU Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] L. Norci School of Physical Sciences and NCPST, Dublin City University Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] Besides carrying the distinction of being the most massive young star cluster in our Galaxy, Westerlund 1 contains the notable Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216. While this is the only collapsed stellar remnant known for this cluster, a further ~10² Supernovae may have occurred on the basis of the cluster Initial Mass Function, possibly all leaving Black Holes. We identify a candidate former companion to the Magnetar in view of its high proper motion directed away from the Magnetar region, viz. the Luminous Blue Variable W243. We discuss the properties of W243 and how they pertain to the former Magnetar companion hypothesis. Binary evolution arguments are employed to derive a progenitor mass for the Magnetar of 24-25 M Sun , just within the progenitor mass range for Neutron Star birth. We also draw attention to another candidate to be member of a former massive binary. 8th INTEGRAL Workshop “The Restless Gamma-ray Universe” Dublin, Ireland September 27-30, 2010 1 Speaker Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Observations of the Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic Center and Its Orbiting Magnetar
    Radio Observations of the Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic Center and its Orbiting Magnetar Rebecca Rimai Diesing Honors Thesis Department of Physics and Astronomy Northwestern University Spring 2017 Honors Thesis Advisor: Farhad Zadeh ! Radio Observations of the Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic Center and its Orbiting Magnetar Rebecca Rimai Diesing Department of Physics and Astronomy Northwestern University Honors Thesis Advisor: Farhad Zadeh Department of Physics and Astronomy Northwestern University At the center of our galaxy a bright radio source, Sgr A*, coincides with a black hole four million times the mass of our sun. Orbiting Sgr A* at a distance of 3 arc seconds (an estimated 0.1 pc) and rotating with a period of 3.76 s is a magnetar, or pulsar⇠ with an extremely strong magnetic field. This magnetar exhibited an X-ray outburst in April 2013, with enhanced, highly variable radio emission detected 10 months later. In order to better understand the behavior of Sgr A* and the magnetar, we study their intensity variability as a function of both time and frequency. More specifically, we present the results of short (8 minute) and long (7 hour) radio continuum observations, taken using the Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) over multiple epochs during the summer of 2016. We find that Sgr A*’s flux density (a proxy for intensity) is highly variable on an hourly timescale, with a frequency dependence that di↵ers at low (34 GHz) and high (44 GHz) frequencies. We also find that the magnetar remains highly variable on both short (8 min) and long (monthly) timescales, in agreement with observations from 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hidden Population of Exotic Neutron Stars 23 May 2013
    A hidden population of exotic neutron stars 23 May 2013 times stronger than for the average neutron star. New observations show that the magnetar known as SGR 0418+5729 (SGR 0418 for short) doesn't fit that pattern. It has a surface magnetic field similar to that of mainstream neutron stars. "We have found that SGR 0418 has a much lower surface magnetic field than any other magnetar," said Nanda Rea of the Institute of Space Science in Barcelona, Spain. "This has important consequences for how we think neutron stars evolve in time, and for our understanding of Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/CSIC-IEEC/N.Rea et al; supernova explosions." Optical: Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, La Palma/WHT; Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech; Illustration: The researchers monitored SGR 0418 for over NASA/CXC/M.Weiss three years using Chandra, ESA's XMM-Newton as well as NASA's Swift and RXTE satellites. They were able to make an accurate estimate of the strength of the external magnetic field by (Phys.org) —Magnetars – the dense remains of measuring how its rotation speed changes during dead stars that erupt sporadically with bursts of an X-ray outburst. These outbursts are likely high-energy radiation - are some of the most caused by fractures in the crust of the neutron star extreme objects known in the Universe. A major precipitated by the buildup of stress in a relatively campaign using NASA's Chandra X-ray strong, wound-up magnetic field lurking just Observatory and several other satellites shows beneath the surface. magnetars may be more diverse - and common - than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • One Or Several Populations of Fast Radio Burst Sources?
    One or several populations of fast radio burst sources? M. Caleb1, L. G. Spitler2 & B. W. Stappers1 1Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany. arXiv:1811.00360v1 [astro-ph.HE] 1 Nov 2018 1 To date, one repeating and many apparently non-repeating fast radio bursts have been de- tected. This dichotomy has driven discussions about whether fast radio bursts stem from a single population of sources or two or more different populations. Here we present the arguments for and against. The field of fast radio bursts (FRBs) has increasingly gained momentum over the last decade. Overall, the FRBs discovered to date show a remarkable diversity of observed properties (see ref 1, http://frbcat.org and Fig. 1). Intrinsic properties that tell us something about the source itself, such as polarization and burst profile shape, as well as extrinsic properties that tell us something about the source’s environment, such as the magnitude of Faraday rotation and multi-path propagation effects, do not yet present a coherent picture. Perhaps the most striking difference is between FRB 121102, the sole repeating FRB2, and the more than 60 FRBs that have so far not been seen to repeat. The observed dichotomy suggests that we should consider the existence of multiple source populations, but it does not yet require it. Most FRBs to date have been discovered with single-pixel telescopes with relatively large angular resolutions. As a result, the non-repeating FRBs have typically been localized to no bet- ter than a few to tens of arcminutes on the sky (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamma-Ray Bursts and Magnetars
    GAMMA-RAY BURSTS AND MAGNETARS How USRA scientists helped make major advancements in high-energy astrophysics. During the 1960s, the second Administrator Frank J. Kerr (1918 - 2000) of the University of NASA, James E. Webb, sought a university- of Maryland was appointed by USRA to based organization that could serve the manage its programs in astronomy and needs of NASA as well as the space research astrophysics. Kerr was a highly-regarded radio community. In particular, Webb sought to astronomer, originally from Australia. He had have university researchers assist NASA in been the Director of the Astronomy Program the planning and execution of large, complex at the University projects. The result of Webb’s vision was of Maryland, the Universities Space Research Association and at the time (USRA), which was incorporated as a non- of his USRA proft association of research universities on appointment 12 March 1969. in 1983, he was Provost of As described in the previous essay, USRA’s the Division of frst major collaboration with NASA was the Physical and Apollo Exploration of the Moon. The vehicle Mathematical by which USRA assisted NASA and the space Sciences and research community was the Lunar Science Engineering at Institute, later renamed the Lunar and the University. Frank Kerr Planetary Institute. In support of Another major project was undertaken in MSFC and NRL, USRA brought astronomers 1983, when USRA began to support NASA to work closely with NASA researchers in in the development of the Space Telescope the development of instrumentation and Project at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight the preparation for analyses of data for Center (MSFC).
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of a Type Iin Supernova in Optical Follow-Up Observations of Icecube Neutrino Events Magellan Workshop, 17–18 March 2016, DESY Hamburg
    Detection of a Type IIn Supernova in Optical Follow-Up Observations of IceCube Neutrino Events Magellan Workshop, 17{18 March 2016, DESY Hamburg Markus Voge, Nora Linn Strotjohann, Alexander Stasik 17 March 2016 Target: transient sources (< 100 s • neutrino burst): GRBs (Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase • & Nagataki 2006) SNe with jets (Razzaque, Meszaros, • Waxman 2005) More exotic phenomena? E.g. Fast • Radio Bursts (FRBs)? (Falcke & Rezzolla 2013) Online Neutrino Analysis Automatic search for interesting IceCube neutrino events • Realtime alerts sent to follow-up instruments • Multi-messenger: Combination with other data fruitful • Follow-up ensures access to data • 2 / 15 Online Neutrino Analysis Automatic search for interesting IceCube neutrino events • Realtime alerts sent to follow-up instruments • Multi-messenger: Combination with other data fruitful • Follow-up ensures access to data • Target: transient sources (< 100 s • neutrino burst): GRBs (Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase • & Nagataki 2006) SNe with jets (Razzaque, Meszaros, • Waxman 2005) More exotic phenomena? E.g. Fast • Radio Bursts (FRBs)? (Falcke & Rezzolla 2013) 2 / 15 The OFU and XFU system SN/GRB PTF (optical) Swift (X-ray) Alerts Alerts Madison/Bonn Iridium IceCube arXiv: 1309.6979 (p.40) 3 / 15 Online analysis scheme neutrino purity At least 8 coincident Trigger Level 0:0001% hits 2000 Hz ∼ Basic muon event se- Level 1 35 Hz 0:01% lection (tracks only) ∼ Up-going tracks Level 2 2 Hz 0:1% ∼ Neutrino selection OFU Level 3 mHz 90% (BDT) ∼ Neutrino multiplet ( 2ν): ≥ Time
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetars: Pion Condensates in the Sky?
    Magnetars: Pion Condensates in the Sky? N.D. Hari Dass TIFR-TCIS, Hyderabad In collaboration with V. Soni(Jamia) & Dipankar Bhattacharya(IUCAA) IWARA 2018, Ollantaytambo, Peru. N.D. Hari Dass Magnetars & Pion Condensates Some References N.D. Hari Dass and V. Soni, Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc., 425, 1558-1566 (2012). H.B. Nielsen and V. Soni, Phys. Lett. B726, 41-44 (2013). N.D. Hari Dass Magnetars & Pion Condensates Neutron Stars Nuclear density ρ 2:8 1014gm=cm3. Equivalently 0 ' n 0:17nucleons=fermi3. 0 ' Stable neutron stars can have masses in the range 0.1 solar mass to 2 solar masses. Most observed pulsars have masses about 1.4 solar masses. Neutron stars produced in core collapse are expected with this mass. Heavier neutron stars are believed to be as a result of acretion later on. Typical radii of NS are 10 - 20 kms. Neutron stars can be thought of as giant nuclei with A 1057! ' N.D. Hari Dass Magnetars & Pion Condensates Neutron Star Structure Density ρ decreases as one moves outwards from the centre. The outer kilometre or so is the Crust. It consists of a lattice of bare nuclei and a degenerate electron gas. Next to the crust is a superfluid layer and vortices here contribute to the angular momentum of the star. These vortices also play an important role in the so called glitches whence the star actually speeds up. The least understood part is the core of the NS. Density here can be in the range of 3-10 times nuclear density. It is also very hot.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetodynamics Inside and Outside Magnetars
    Magnetodynamics Inside and Outside Magnetars Xinyu Li Submitted in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 ©2019 Xinyu Li All Rights Reserved Abstract Magnetodynamics Inside and Outside Magnetars Xinyu Li The ultra-strong magnetic fields of magnetars have profound implications for their radiative phenomena. We study the dynamics of strong magnetic fields inside and outside magnetars. Inside the magnetar, the strong magnetic stress can break the crust and trigger plastic failures. The interaction between magnetic fields and plastic failures is studied in two scenarios: 1. Internal Hall waves launched from the core-crust interface can initiate plastic failures and lead to X-ray outbursts. 2. External Alfven waves produced by giant flares can also initiate crustal plastic failures which dissipate the waves and give rise to delayed thermal afterglow. The crustal dissipation of Alfven waves competes with the magnetospheric dissipation outside the magnetar. Using a high order simulation of Force-Free Electrodynamics (FFE), we found that the magnetospheric dissipation of Alfven waves is generally slow and most wave energy will dissipate inside the magnetar. Contents List of Figures v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Neutrons Stars . 2 1.1.1 Theoretical and observational discovery . .2 1.1.2 Structure of neutron stars . 5 1.2 Magnetars . 10 1.2.1 Discovery . 10 1.2.2 Magnetar Activities . 12 1.2.3 Theoretical Models . 16 1.3 This Dissertation . 24 Chapter 2 Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) 26 2.1 Ideal MHD . 26 2.1.1 Nonrelativistic ideal MHD .
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of Frbs
    Credit: Swinburne in Fast Radio Burst detection detection Burst FastRadio in Strategic uses of single dishes (and GB) (and singledishes uses of Strategic DuncanLorimer, Dept. Physics and of Astronomy, WestVirginia University FRB lowdown • 21 published so far • Flux > 0.5 Jy @ 1.4 GHz • Pulse widths > few ms • Highly dispersed • Weakly scattered • One FRB so far repeats! • Few arcmin localization • One counterpart so far • ~few x 1000/day/sky Credit: Thornton et al. (2013) What might FRBs probe? • New/exciting physics • Cosmological NS census? • Non-stellar origin? • Fundamental tests? • The intergalactic medium • Electron content → missing baryons? • Magnetic field || to line of sight • Cosmology • Rulers • DM halos, DM/DE parameterization Single-pulse search pipeline DM Cordes & McLaughlin (2003) Credit: Spitler et al. (2014) 2014: FRB 121102 at Arecibo at FRB 121102 2014: Credit: Masui et al. (2015) 2015: FRB 110523 at GBT at FRB 110523 2015: • More “theories” than bursts! • Colliding compact objects (e.g. NS-NS) • Supernovae • Collapsing NS → BH (blitzar) • Black hole absorbing NSs • Giant pulses from pulsars/magnetars • Neutron star – asteroid belt interaction • More exotic (strange) star interactions • Galactic Flare Stars • Light sails from ET • Dark matter • Cosmic strings • White holes No! Maybe? No! → → → or maybesomethingor else? … … 2016: FRB 121102 repeats! 121102 FRB 2016: Credit: Spitler et al. and Scholz et al. (2016) 2017: FRB 121102 localized! Credit: NRAO Credit: Chatterjee et al. (2017) z = 0.19 (2.3 billion yr) We
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Star Collapse Times, Gamma-Ray Bursts and Fast Radio Bursts
    MNRAS 441, 2433–2439 (2014) doi:10.1093/mnras/stu720 The birth of black holes: neutron star collapse times, gamma-ray bursts and fast radio bursts ‹ Vikram Ravi1,2 and Paul D. Lasky1 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/441/3/2433/1126394 by California Institute of Technology user on 24 June 2019 1School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia 2CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia Accepted 2014 April 8. Received 2014 April 7; in original form 2013 November 29 ABSTRACT Recent observations of short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) suggest that binary neutron star (NS) mergers can create highly magnetized, millisecond NSs. Sharp cut-offs in X-ray afterglow plateaus of some SGRBs hint at the gravitational collapse of these remnant NSs to black holes. The collapse of such ‘supramassive’ NSs also describes the blitzar model, a leading candidate for the progenitors of fast radio bursts (FRBs). The observation of an FRB associated with an SGRB would provide compelling evidence for the blitzar model and the binary NS merger scenario of SGRBs, and lead to interesting constraints on the NS equation of state. We predict the collapse times of supramassive NSs created in binary NS mergers, finding that such stars collapse ∼10–4.4 × 104 s (95 per cent confidence) after the merger. This directly impacts observations targeting NS remnants of binary NS mergers, providing the optimal window for high time resolution radio and X-ray follow-up of SGRBs and gravitational wave bursts.
    [Show full text]