DOCSLIB.ORG

Rights of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rights of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Croatia 2005 Throughout Europe, people with intellectual disabilities face overwhel- Croatia Rights of People with Intellectual Disabilities ming stigma and prejudice and encounter significant barriers to realising their fundamental rights. EUMAP, the EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program of the Open Society Institute, in cooperation with the Open Society Mental Health Initiative, has monitored this situation in 14 countries throughout Europe, both EU members and candidate countries: Rights of People with Bulgaria; Croatia; the Czech Republic; Estonia; Greece; Hungary; Latvia; Lithuania; the Netherlands; Poland; Romania; Slovakia; Slovenia and the Intellectual Disabilities UK. Carried out by local experts and civil society groups, the monitoring focuses on the extent to which people with intellectual disabilities have Access to Education access to education and employment. This series of reports presents the findings of the monitoring and also makes recommendations for impro- and Employment ving the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. The reports are also available at www.eumap.org. CROATIA Monitoring Report Hrvatska Prava osoba s intelektualnim tekoæama HRVATSKA Prava osoba s Diljem Europe osobe s intelektualnim tekoæama izrazito su stigmatizi- rane, suoèavaju se s predrasudama te nailaze na ogromne prepreke u intelektualnim tekoæama ostvarivanju svojih temeljnih prava. EUMAP, ( EU Program Monitoringa i zastupanja Instituta Otvoreno drutvo, u Pristup obrazovanju suradnji s Inicijativom za Mentalno zdravlje, pratio je poloaj ovih osoba u 14 zemalja Europe, kako èlanicama EU tako i zemljama kandidatki- i zapoljavanju njama: u Bugarskoj; Hrvatskoj; Èekoj; Estoniji; Grèkoj; Maðarskoj; Latviji; Litvi; Nizozemskoj; Poljskoj; Rumunjskoj; Slovaèkoj; Sloveniji i Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu). Monitoring kojeg su provodili lokalni struènjaci i organi- zacije civilnog drutva usredotoèen je na stvaran doseg pristupa ove skupi- ne osoba obrazovanju i zapoljavanju. U ovoj seriji izvjeæa predstavljeni su nalazi monitoringa, ali su dane i preporuke za unapreðivanje socijalne Izvjeæe o monitoringu inkluzije osoba s intelektualnim tekoæama. Izvjeæa su dostupna i na www.eumap.org. OSI 2005 HRVATSKA Rights of People with Intellectual Disabilities Access to Education and Employment CROATIA Monitoring Report HRVATSKA Prava osoba s intelektualnim tekoæama Pristup obrazovanju i zapoljavanju Izvjeæe o monitoringu EUMAP EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM 20051 OPEN SOCIETY MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE Published by OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE Október 6. u. 12. H-1051 Budapest Hungary 400 West 59th Street New York, NY 10019 USA © OSI/EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program, 2005 All rights reserved. TM and Copyright © 2005 Open Society Institute EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM Október 6. u. 12. H-1051 Budapest Hungary Website <www.eumap.org> Copies of the book can be ordered from the EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program <[email protected]> Printed by Kratis, Zagreb, Croatia, 2005 Design & Layout by Q.E.D. Publishing Rights of People with Intellectual Disabilities Access to Education and Employment Croatia MONITORING ACCESS TO EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................ 5 Preface ........................................................................................... 9 Foreword ..................................................................................... 11 I. Executive Summary and Recommendations .......................... 13 1. Executive Summary ......................................................... 13 2. Recommendations ........................................................... 17 II. Country Overview and Background ...................................... 22 1. Legal and Administrative Framework .............................. 22 1.1 International obligations ........................................... 22 1.2 Domestic legislation and policy ................................ 23 2. General Situation of People with Disabilities ................... 27 2.1 Definitions ............................................................... 27 2.2 Diagnosis of disability ............................................... 29 2.3 Guardianship ............................................................ 29 2.4 Statistical data ........................................................... 33 2.5 Deinstitutionalisation ............................................... 34 III. Access to Education .............................................................. 36 1. Legal Framework ............................................................. 36 1.1 The right to education .............................................. 36 1.2 Structure and administration of the school system .... 37 1.3 Assessment of disability for educational purposes ...... 40 1.4 Early intervention ..................................................... 42 2. Government Educational Policy ...................................... 45 2.1 The EU and Government educational policy ............ 45 2.2 Development of education policy ............................. 46 3. Education in Practice ...................................................... 48 3.1 Resources and support .............................................. 48 2 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE 2005 CROATIA 3.3.1 Curricula and support .................................... 48 3.1.2 Teacher training ............................................ 51 3.2 Inclusive education ................................................... 52 3.2.1 Pre-school ...................................................... 52 3.2.2 Mainstreaming .............................................. 54 3.2.3 Special schools ............................................... 55 3.3 Education outside the school system ......................... 57 3.3.1 Home schooling ............................................ 57 3.3.2 Education of children in institutions .............. 57 4. Transition from Education to Employment ..................... 58 4.1 Vocational training ................................................... 58 4.2 Adult or life-long education ...................................... 61 4.3 Employment Services ................................................ 62 IV. Access to Employment .......................................................... 63 1. Legal and Administrative Framework ............................... 63 1.1 National legislation ................................................... 63 1.2 Capacity assessment for employment and benefits purposes .................................................................... 65 1.2.1 Assessment for social welfare benefits ............. 65 1.2.2 Assessment for work capacity ......................... 67 1.3 The role of the social welfare system .......................... 69 2. Government Employment Policy ..................................... 70 2.1 The EU and Government employment policy ........... 70 2.2 Development of Government employment policies ... 71 2.3 Government requirements and incentives for employment .............................................................. 73 3. Employment in Practice ................................................... 74 3.1 Statistical information ............................................... 75 3.2 Supported employment on the open market .............. 76 3.3 The sheltered workplace ............................................ 77 V. Conclusions .......................................................................... 78 EUMAP – EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM OPEN SOCIETY MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE 3 MONITORING ACCESS TO EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT Annex 1. Legislation cited in the report ....................................... 82 Annex 2. Bibliography ................................................................. 84 4 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements The EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program of the Open Society Institute and the Open Society Mental Health Initiative would like to acknowledge the primary role of the following individuals in researching and drafting these monitoring reports. Final responsibility for the content of the reports rests with EUMAP. Bulgaria Slavka Kukova Bulgarian Helsinki Committee Croatia Ljiljana Pintarić Mlinar University of Zagreb, Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation Czech Republic Jan Šiška Charles University, Faculty of Education Estonia Agne Raudmees EVPIT - Estonian Mentally Disabled People Support Organization Greece John Tsiantis, and Association for the Psychosocial Health Harris Asimopoulos, of Children and Adolescents (APHCA) Stavroula Diareme, Dimitra Giannakopoulou, Gerasimos Kolaitis, Eugenia Soumaki, Konstantinos Thiveos, Evangelos Zacharias Hungary Emese Kôvágó Salva Vita Foundation Latvia Ieva Leimane-Veldmeijere Latvian Centre for Human Rights and Ethnic Studies Lithuania Dovile Juodkaitė Lithuanian Welfare Society for People and Klementina Gečaitė with Intellectual Disability – Viltis Netherlands Jacqueline Schoonheim University of Maastricht, Faculty of Law Poland Ewa Wapiennik Maria Grzegorzewska Academy of Special Education, Warsaw Romania Raluca Nica Romanian League for Mental Health Slovakia Alexandra Bražinová League for Mental Health and Viera Zahorcová Inclusion Slovakia Slovenia Darja Zaviršek University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social and Špela Urh Work EUMAP – EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM OPEN SOCIETY MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE 5 MONITORING ACCESS TO EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT United Kingdom Stephen Beyer Welsh Centre for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Croatia 07/2018
    Monitoring Implementation of the Council of Europe Recommendation to the member states on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity CM/Rec(2010)5 DOCUMENTATION REPORT ON THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA 07/2018 Prepared by ZAGREB PRIDE web: www.zagreb-pride.net email: [email protected] ++385(0)1 580 65 60 Skype: zagrebpride Social media: @zagrebpride _________ TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION 4 About Zagreb Pride 4 About the Report 4 Political System and Demographics 4 Executive Summary 5 Methodology 8 Acknowledgements 9 RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Section 1 – Implementation of the Recommendation 18 Section 2 – Implementation of the specific provisions in the Appendix 21 2.1. Right to life, security and protection from violence 21 2.1.A. “Hate crimes” and other hate-motivated incidents 21 2.1.A.1 Hate crime legislation 21 2.1.A.2 Underreporting of homophobic and transphobic hate crimes 22 2.1.A.3 Documenting and reporting hate crimes 24 2.1.A.4. Zagreb Pride’s compiled data on hate crimes 25 2.1.A.5. Hate crimes – case studies 27 2.1.B. “Hate speech” 31 2.1.B.1. Hate speech – case studies 33 2.2. Freedom of association 38 2.3. Freedom of expression and peaceful assembly 41 2.4. Right to respect for private and family life 46 2.4.1. Legal gender recognition 46 2.4.2. Legal recognition of same sex couples 47 2.4.3. Institutional and political discrimination of same-sex life partners 48 2.4.4. Discrimination of informal same-sex life partners – case studies 50 2.4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia (FYROM) and Kosovo International Assistance to Media
    R E P R E S E N TATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia (FYROM) and Kosovo International Assistance to Media A Report by Mark Thompson Vienna 2000 The cover is a drawing by the German author and Nobel Prize laureate (1999), Günter Grass, “Des Schreibers Hand” (The writer’s hand). He gave his kind permission for its use as the logo of the publications of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. The drawing was created in the context of his novel Das Treffen in Telgte, dealing with the literary authors at the time of the Thirty Years Wa r. This report was possible due to the financial support of the European Commission © Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media 2000 Kärntnerring 5/7, Top 14, 2. DG A-1010 Vienna, Austria Te l . +43-1 512 21 450 F a x +43-1 512 21 459 p m - f o m @ o s c e . o r g Design: WerkstattKrystianBieniek, Vi e n n a Printed by Eugen Ketterl, Vi e n n a C o n t e n t s Freimut Duve, 4 Foreword, 5 Slovenia, 8 Croatia, 13 Bosnia and Herzegovina, 3 2 Macedonia (FYROM), 5 0 Kosovo, 6 1 Conclusions and Recommendations, 7 5 The Author, 9 5 P r e f a c e This extensive report by Mark Thompson, author and prominent expert, to my knowledge, is probably the first of its kind. When my office came to the conclusion that an overview on the media activities of international organi- zations in the post-Yugoslav world would be useful to governments and to those international organizations, which are involved in the post-war assis- tance, I had no trouble identifying the author with the relevant regional expe- rience and the necessary expert approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Croatia: Overview of 2019 Publisher: Human Rights House Zagreb Selska Cesta 112 A/C, 10000 Zagreb
    OVERVIEW OF 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS IN CROATIA Human Rights in Croatia: Overview of 2019 Publisher: Human Rights House Zagreb Selska cesta 112 a/c, 10000 Zagreb www.kucaljudskihprava.hr For the publisher: Ivan Novosel Editorial board: Tina Đaković and Ivan Novosel Research team: Ivan Buljan, Tea Dabić and Klara Horvat Translation: Klara Horvat Design and layout: Radnja Printing: ACT Printlab d.o.o. Circulation: 300 ISSN: 1848–8994 Zagreb, March 2020 Human Rights House Zagreb is a Knowledge Centre active in the field of protection and promotion of human rights as part of the Development Cooperation with the National Foundation for Civil Society Development. This publication is funded with the support of the National Foundation for Civial Society Development. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the Human Rights House Zagreb and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Foundation for Civil Society Devel- opment. Human Rights House Zagreb is a human rights organisation established in 2008 as a network of civil society organi- sations with the goal of protecting and promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms. The HRH’s vision is to build a democratic, pluralist and inclusive society founded upon the values of human rights, the rule of law, social justice and solidarity. The HRH contributes to the protec- tion, promotion, developing and advancing human rights and fundamental freedoms through research, monitoring, public advocacy and education. By publishing annual hu- man rights overviews, thematic reports
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Croatia
    Human Rights in Croatia: Overview of 2018 Publisher: Kuća ljudskih prava Zagreb (Human Rights House Zagreb) Selska cesta 112 a/c, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia www.kucaljudskihprava.hr Publisher represented by: Ivan Novosel Editorial board: Tina Đaković i Ivan Novosel Research team: Tea Dabić, Klara Horvat, Dženana Kalamujić, Sara Sharifi, Ivana Vejić Translated by: Hana Dvornik, Riječ i savjet (Word of Advice) Design and layout: radnja.hr Printed by: ACT Printlab d.o.o. Print-run: 300 ISSN: 1848-8994 Zagreb, March 2019 The Human Rights House Zagreb is a Knowledge Centre in the field of protection and promotion of human rights, within the framework of the Development Cooperation with the National Foundation for Civil Society Development. This publication was made possible by the financial support of the National Foundation for Civil Society Development. The content of this publication is the exclusive respon- sibility of the Human Rights House Zagreb and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Foundation for Civil Society Development. The Human Rights House Zagreb is a human rights organ- isation established in 2008 as a network of civil society organisations with the goal of protecting and promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms. The HRH’s vision is to build a democratic, pluralist and inclusive society founded upon the values of human rights, the rule of law, social justice and solidarity. The HRH contributes to the protection, promotion, developing and advancing human rights and fundamental freedoms through research, mon- itoring, public advocacy and education. By publishing an- nual human rights reviews, thematic reports and petitions, we help to create better laws and public policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate
    ILLYRIAN POLICY OF ROME IN THE LATE REPUBLIC AND EARLY PRINCIPATE Danijel Dzino Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics University of Adelaide August 2005 II Table of Contents TITLE PAGE I TABLE OF CONTENTS II ABSTRACT V DECLARATION VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF PLATES AND MAPS IX 1. Introduction, approaches, review of sources and secondary literature 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Rome and Illyricum (a short story) 2 1.3 Methodology 6 1.4.1 Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Policy as an interaction between systems 9 1.4.2 The Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Working hypothesis 11 1.5 The stages in the Roman Illyrian relationship (the development of a political/constitutional framework) 16 1.6 Themes and approaches: Illyricum in Roman historiography 18 1.7.1 Literature review: primary sources 21 1.7.2 Literature review: modern works 26 2. Illyricum in Roman foreign policy: historical outline, theoretical approaches and geography 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Roman foreign policy: Who made it, how and why was it made, and where did it stop 30 2.3 The instruments of Roman foreign policy 36 2.4 The place of Illyricum in the Mediterranean political landscape 39 2.5 The geography and ethnography of pre-Roman Illyricum 43 III 2.5.1 The Greeks and Celts in Illyricum 44 2.5.2 The Illyrian peoples 47 3. The Illyrian policy of Rome 167 – 60 BC: Illyricum - the realm of bifocality 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Prelude: the making of bifocality 56 3.3 The South and Central Adriatic 60 3.4 The North Adriatic 65 3.5 Republican policy in Illyricum before Caesar: the assessment 71 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil and Political Rights in Croatia
    Croatia Page 1 of 78 Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS IN CROATIA Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch Copyright © October 1995 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-75413 ISBN 1-56432-148-7 Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch/Helsinki was established in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. It is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria. Holly Cartner is the executive director; Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Ivana Nizich and Christopher Panico are research associates; Ivan Lupis is the research assistant; Anne Kuper, Alexander Petrov and Lenee Simon are associates. Jonathan Fanton is the chair of the advisory committee and Alice Henkin is vice chair. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia by Petar Doric´
    Croatia by Petar Doric´ Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.4 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$18,780 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 3.00 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Independent Media 3.75 3.75 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 National Democratic 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Governance Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 and Independence Corruption 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 Democracy Score 3.75 3.71 3.75 3.64 3.71 3.71 3.64 3.61 3.61 3.68 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide in Bosnia-Hercegovina: a Very Short History
    Genocide in Bosnia-Hercegovina: A Very Short History Thomas White | Cohen Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies |Keene, New Hampshire| [email protected] Hikmet Karčić | Institute for Islamic Tradition of Bosniaks | Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina | [email protected] Overview In 1990, as Yugoslavia collapsed, the first multiparty elections were held. These elections created nationalist parties intent on perpetuating ethno-national identities and causes. By 1992, war was being imposed through Serbian and Croatian nationalists seeking to expanded into “greater” national territory. In the coming years the perpetrators of “ethnic cleansing,” displacement, mass atrocity, and genocide, were rewarded by the international community at the Dayton Accords in 1995. Dayton ended the war, but then imposed an ethno-nationalistic portioned Bosnia. A “tycoon class” of nationalist leaders continues to enrich themselves through corruption supported by poverty, fear, insecurity, and the promotion of divisive ethnic identities. The hate didn’t exist before; it was artificially installed. It was all so unbelievable that at first, it seemed funny…The emphasis on ethnicity and exclusion was so strong that ethnic hatred became normalized…There is also the ideology of religion and nationality…Never has there been more religion and less faith…National and religious identities are openly used as weapons in the political arsenal.” – Vedran Grahovac, Prijedor1 Denial of Bosnian genocide is rooted in Serb and Croat religious nationalism and Islamophobia. Unresolved and manipulated memory continue to haunt the Balkans. It is a fundamental mistake, however, to accept the narrative of “Balkanization” as an intractable “truth” of people living here. Balkanization implies that people are separated by exclusive group identities that make them prone to war and to live in perpetual hostility.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatian Public Television – Lost in Transformation
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2009 Croatian Public Television – Lost in Transformation Iveta Imre University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Imre, Iveta, "Croatian Public Television – Lost in Transformation. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2009. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/531 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Iveta Imre entitled "Croatian Public Television – Lost in Transformation." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Communication and Information. Norman Swan, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Barbara Moore, Margaret Morrison Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Iveta Imre entitled “Croatian Public Television – Lost in Transformation.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Communication and Information Norman Swan Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Barbara Moore Margaret Morrison Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Is an International Legal Instrument of the United Nations, Dating from 1966 (Hereinafter: “The Covenant”)
    UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant Distr. on civil and GENERAL political rights CCPR/C/HRV/2 2 December 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Second periodic report of States parties CROATIA* [28 November 2007] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08-45541 (E) 091208 CCPR/C/HRV/2 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 - 13 4 Article 1 ......................................................................................................... 14 - 24 7 Article 2 ......................................................................................................... 25 - 41 10 Article 3 ......................................................................................................... 42 - 67 13 Article 4 ......................................................................................................... 68 - 70 20 Article 5 ......................................................................................................... 71 - 72 20 Article 6 ......................................................................................................... 73 - 84 21 Article 7 ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • B. the Situation in Croatia
    Chapter VIII. Consideration of questions under the responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security Underlining the need for full cooperation by States and North and South continued to be reported, although on entities with the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of a reduced scale. Moreover, there was a considerable Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International discrepancy between the number of perpetrators that Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former had been brought to justice and the number of reported Yugoslavia since 1991, which constitutes an essential aspect of implementing the Peace Agreement, violations of human rights. Croatian police officials had generally appeared to have displayed an Reminding the parties of the relationship between the unresponsive attitude to complaints against Croatian fulfilment by them of their commitments in the Peace civilians and security personnel and, in many cases, Agreement and the readiness of the international community to commit financial resources for reconstruction and development, had taken no action. He stated that the rights of Krajina Serbs to remain in their homes had not been adequately Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United safeguarded and they had faced extensive harassment Nations, and intimidation. In addition, the rights of the Serb 1. Notes with satisfaction that the elections called for population that had fled during the military operation in annex 3 of the Peace Agreement took place on 14 September to return to their homes in safety and dignity were 1996 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and notes that their holding being seriously curtailed by the absence of constructive constituted an essential step towards achieving the objectives of measures to facilitate their return.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and Central Asia Overview
    EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA OVERVIEW Human Rights Developments The long-anticipated outbreak of violence in the province of KosovoCwith war crimes committed primarily by Yugoslav government forces against the civilian ethnic Albanian populationCand the dramatic deterioration of Russia=s economy that pushed the country to the verge of chaos were the most notable developments in the region in 1998. Both cases underscored the threat posed when human rights and the rule of law are downplayed in order to promote interests such as territorial integrity, regional security, or economic gain. While the international community touted the need for regional stability and a regional approach to security concerns, governments such as the United States and the member states of the E.U. often ignored the regional security threat posed by human rights violations and indicated no recognition that the failure to insist on accountability for atrocities in one country or region often fueled abuses in another. There was a distinct deterioration of the human rights situation in Belarus, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. And while President Saparmurat Niyazov was being unconditionally welcomed at the White House by President Clinton, the government of Turkmenistan continued to deny its citizens virtually all civil liberties. Other areas of concern in the region included a growing problem of religious persecution, attempts to intimidate or shut down the independent press, widespread ethnic discrimination, and a continuing problem of police brutality that often reached the level of torture. Sporadic fighting occurred in the Abkhazia region of Georgia and in Tajikistan, although cease-fire agreements remained in force in both countries, and numerous abuses continued to be perpetrated by both sides in the conflict in southeastern Turkey, although at a lesser intensity than during the mid-1990s.
    [Show full text]