DOCSLIB.ORG

Pipeline Project Preliminary Information Packagefor the Northern Gas Pipeline Project Volume I Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pipeline Project Preliminary Information Packagefor the Northern Gas Pipeline Project Volume I Table of Contents A- 54967 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR THE NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE PROJECT PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PACKAGEFOR THE NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE PROJECT VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 .. A . Project Descrlptlon................................................................................................................. 1 B. Capital Structure. .................................................................................................................... 4 C . Consortium Approach............................................................................................................ 5 D . Aboriginal Ownership and Benefits....................................................................................... 5 E . Tolls and Access ..................................................................................................................... 6 F . Alaska ..................................................................................................................................... 7 G . Regulatory Matters................................................................................................................. 7 H . Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 8 I1 . PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 9 A . Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 B . Corridor Selection Considerations ......................................................................................... 9 C . Selection of the Preferred Corridor ...................................................................................... 11 D . Considerations for Detailed Routing.................................................................................... 12 I11 . EARLY PUBLIC NOTIFICATIONAND CONSULTATION ............................................. 14 A . Overview.............................................................................................................................. 14 B . Timelines for the Implementation of EPNC ........................................................................ 15 1. Short Term .................................................................................................................... 15 2 . Long Term .................................................................................................................... 15 C . Selected Comments and Responses ..................................................................................... 16 IV . PROJECT COMPONENTSAND FACILITIES ................................................................... 18 1 A . Description of the Project Components and Facilities......................................................... 18 1 . Components of the NGPP ............................................................................................. 18 (a) GeneralDescription .............................................................................................. 18 ... (b) Permanent Facilities.............................................................................................. 20 (c) Temporary Facilities and Infrastructure Related to Construction......................... 21 (d) Project Capacity Plan and Standards .................................................................... 22 (e) Work Area Configuration ....................................... ;............................................. 23 V . PROJECT LOCATIONAND ACTIVITIES ............................ .............................................. 24 A . Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 24 B . Construction Plan ................................................................................................................. 24 C . Construction Schedule.......................................................................................................... 34 D . Key Activities Schedule....................................................................................................... 34 E . Proposed In-service Dates.................................................................................................... 34 F . Estimates of Material andHuman Requirements ................................................................. 34 1 . Material and Human Requirements .............................................................................. 34 VI . SOCIAL. ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL ASSESSMENT ................................................ 35 A . Social and Economic Effects of the Development of the NGPP ......................................... 35 B . Overview of Current Territorial Aboriginal Jurisdictional. Administrativeand Business Interests ..................................................................................................................................... 35 1 . Inuvialuit ....................................................................................................................... 35 2 . Gwich’in........................................................................................................................ 37 3 . sahtu ............................................................................................................................. 37 4 . Deh Cho ........................................................................................................................ 39 5 . Northern Alberta ........................................................................................................... 40 C . Key Socio-economic Issues ................................................................................................. 40 1 . Overview....................................................................................................................... 40 .. 11 2 . Anticipated Benefits of the NGPP ................................................................................ 42 (a) CapacityBuilding ................................................................................................. 42 (b) Direct Employment and Income Effects............................................................... 43 (c) LandSponsor Fees ................................................................................................ 43 (d) Business Opportunities, Partnerships and Spin-offs ............................................ 43 (e) Indirect Effects...................................................................................................... 45 ... (f) InducedDevelopment Activities ........................................................................... 45 (g) Economic Impact on Non-Aboriginal Peoples ..................................................... 45 VI1 . KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ..................................................................................... 46 A . Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 46 B . Environmental Features .Physical and Biological Components Likely to be Affected by the NGPP .................................................................................................................................. 46 C . Proposed Project Scope ........................................................................................................ 52 D . Key Issues affecting Design, Constructionand Operation .................................................. 53 1. Beaufort Offshore ......................................................................................................... 53 2. Yukon Coastal Plain ..................................................................................................... 54 3 . Porcupine Plateau .......................................................................................................... 55 4. Victoria and Albert Mountains ..................................................................................... 55 5 . Peel Plateau ................................................................................................................... 56 6 . Mackenzie River Delta ................................................................................................. 57 7. Peel Plain ...................................................................................................................... 58 8 . Anderson Plain .............................................................................................................. 58 9 . Franklin Mountains ....................................................................................................... 59 10. MackenziePlain ........................................................................................................ 60 11. Great Slave Plain ....................................................................................................... 60 12 . Alberta Plat~au.......................................................................................................... 61 iii 13. Fort Nelson Lowland ................................................................................................ 61 14 . Peace River Lowland ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • G18x005 G18l8-001
    November 16, 2020 File: G18X005 G18L8-001 Mr. Mark Cliffe-Phillips Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board 200 Scotia Center Box 938, 5102 - 50th Avenue Yellowknife NT X1A 2N7 Sent via email Dear Mr. Cliffe-Phillips, Re: Notice of Preliminary Screening Determination – Application for Permit and Water Licence Inuvik Wind Project – Inuvik, NT The Gwich’in Land and Water Board (Board) met on November 14, 2020 and considered the Application from NWT Energy Corporation (03) Ltd. (NTEC) for Type A Land Use Permit (Permit) G18X005 and Water Licence (Licence) G18L8-001 for the Inuvik Wind Project in Inuvik, NT, in accordance with the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act (MVRMA). The Board conducted a preliminary screening based on the Application and the public record for the proceeding. Based on the evidence provided, the Board is satisfied the screening has been completed according to section 125 of the MVRMA and has decided not to refer the project to environmental assessment. The Preliminary Screening Report includes the Board’s reasons for decision, as required by section 121 of the MVRMA (attached). If the Board does not receive notice of referral to environmental assessment, it will proceed with the issuances of G18X005 and G18L8-001 on November 27, 2020. Our Board and staff look forward to continued communications throughout the pause period. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter, please contact AlecSandra Macdonald at (867) 777-4954 Yours sincerely, Elizabeth Wright Chair, GLWB Copied to: GLWB Distribution List Attached: Preliminary Screening Report, including Reasons for Decision Preliminary Screening Report Form Preliminary screener: GLWB EIRB Reference / File number: G18X005 G18L8-001 Reference number: TITLE: Inuvik Wind Project ORGANIZATION: NWT Energy (03) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    SC-20/CONF.232/10 29 September 2020 Original English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION International Coordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme Thirty-second session Online meeting 27th- 28th October 2020 ITEM OF THE PROVISIONAL AGENDA: Presentation of the Technical Guidelines for Biosphere Reserves 1. At its 27th session, the MAB International Coordinating Council (MAB-ICC) decided the development of Technical Guidelines for Biosphere Reserves (referred as TGBR thereafter) and entrusted the MAB Secretariat for this endeavour. The MAB Secretariat reported on the progress of the development of the TGBR since the 29th session of the MAB-ICC1. 2. The TGBR will enable Member States and the MAB Council to respond more appropriately and timely to the various practical challenges and technical questions encountered in the implementation of the Seville Strategy and the articles of the Statutory Framework of World Network of Biosphere Reserve (WNBR). By providing critical information and clarification on the WNBR, the TGBR fosters the implementation of current - MAB strategy (2015-2025), the Lima Action Plan (2016- 2025) - and future Strategies and Action Plans. 3. The TGBR will be an open access web-based living document compiling contributions and experiences from the MAB community on specific items. As the TGBR cannot answer all the possible questions and needs, it is flexible and will be periodically updated and used preferably with the TGBR support webpage, where references to discussed topics can be shared in more detail. 4. In support of the drafting process of the TGBR, the MAB Council decided to establish a TGBR-working group (TGBR-WG) to support the work of the MAB Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Co-Management in the Sahtu: a Framework for Analysis
    UNIVERSTIY OF CALGARY Evaluating Co-management in the Sahtu: A Framework for Analysis by Darwin Bateyko A MASTER’S DEGREE PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE FAC ULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER 2003 © Darwin Bateyko 2003 iii iv THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN The undersigned certify that the y have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Environmental Design for acceptance, a Master's Degree Project entitled Evaluating Co-management in the Sahtu: A Framework for Analysis submitted by Darwin Bateyko in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Design (Environmental Science). __________________________ Prof. Karim-Aly Kassam – Faculty of Communication and Culture Supervisor __________________________ Dr. Norman Simmons – Faculty of Environmental Design (Adjunct) __________________________ Dr. Cormack Gates – Faculty of Environmental Design __________________________ Date: September 26th 2003 v vi Abstract Evaluating Co-management in the Sahtu: A Framework for Analysis Darwin Bateyko September, 2003 A MASTER’S DEGREE PROJECT SUBMITTED TO T HE FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) Supervisor: Professor Karim-Aly Kassam In theory, co-management is defined as a partnership arrangement in which government, the community of local resource users, and other resource stakeholders, share the responsibility and authority for the management of a resource. In practice, however, co- management has been used to describe a number of resource management regimes, ranging from processes that utilize only community consultation, to partnerships that incorporate equal participant decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim
    Annual Report of the Implementation Committee April 1, 2000–March 31, 2001 Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement 2001 Annual Report Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2001 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca QS-5354-021-BB-A1 Catalogue No. R31-10/2001 ISBN 0-662-66189-3 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada foreword The Implementation Committee is pleased to provide its annual report describes achievements and developments seventh annual report on the implementation of the Sahtu during the year. Information is contributed by various federal Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement. The and territorial departments, the SSI and other bodies estab- report covers the fiscal year from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. lished under the Agreement. The Implementation Committee comprises a senior official from We are committed to strengthening the partnerships that are each of the parties: the Sahtu Secretariat Incorporated (SSI), key to the successful implementation of this Agreement. Our the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) and achievements to date are the product of partners working the Government of Canada. It functions by consensus and together to recognize Aboriginal rights in an atmosphere of serves as a forum where parties can raise issues and voice mutual respect, and the commitment of the parties to fulfil obli- their concerns. gations pursuant to this Agreement. The role of the Implementation Committee is to oversee, direct and monitor implementation of the Agreement. This John Tutcho Mark Warren Aideen Nabigon Sahtu Secretariat Government of the Government of Incorporated Northwest Territories Canada 2000–2001 Annual Report | i table of contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Report on Canada's Aboriginal Consultation Activities
    Updated Report on Canada’s Aboriginal Consultation Activities for the Mackenzie Gas Project Submitted to the National Energy Board Pursuant to Hearing Order GH-1-2004 March 15, 2010 Volume 1 – Report Updated Report on Canada’s Aboriginal Consultation Activities for the Mackenzie Gas Project REVISED TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Glossary of Terms............................................................................................v 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................1 2. The Mackenzie Gas Project – Crown Consultation Unit (MGP-CCU) ...................................................1 3. Crown Consultation and the MGP.........................................................4 3.1 How Did We Consult? ................................................................4 3.1.1 The Joint Review Panel and National Energy Board Hearing Processes .............................................5 3.1.2 Information on Aboriginal Concerns Provided by the Proponent............................................5 3.2 Direct Consultations ...................................................................5 3.2.1 Who Did We Consult?...................................................5 3.2.2 Process for Direct Consultation.....................................6 3.3 Consultation Binder ....................................................................7 4. Funding .................................................................................................7 4.1 Funding Related to the Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • People, Land, and Pipelines: Perspectives on Resource Decision-Making Processes in the Sahtu Region, Northwest Territories
    University of Alberta People, Land, and Pipelines: Perspectives on Resource Decision-Making Processes in the Sahtu Region, Northwest Territories by Carly A. Dokis A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anthropology © Carly A. Dokis Spring 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60502-8 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60502-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • NWT Summary of Hunting and Trapping Regulations
    Northwest Territories Summary of Hunting and Trapping Regulations July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 HunTing in THe northwesT TeRRiToRies and CoVid-19 This document was printed in May 2021 for the 2021-22 hunting season. At the time of printing, several public health orders were in place for the Northwest Territories (NWT) to limit the spread of COVID-19. For current health orders and advice, consult with the Health and Social Services website: www.hss.gov.nt.ca/covid-19. It is recommended that hunters in the NWT continue to follow best practices to stay healthy and limit the spread of COVID-19. non-ResidenT HunTeRs Non-resident hunters should ensure they are aware of the latest restrictions before booking any trips to the Northwest Territories. Current advisories and updates to GNWT services can be found at: www.hss.gov.nt.ca/covid-19. Northwest Territories Summary of Hunting and Trapping Regulations Trapping and Summary of Hunting Territories Northwest Table of ConTenTs 3 WILDLIFE REGULATION UPDATES 7 SUMMARY OF TRAPPING REGULATIONS 3 Hunter Education Course 7 Carcass and Sample Collections 3 Muskox 8 Exporting Wildlife from the NWT 3 Wood Bison 8 Harvesting Wildlife on Private Lands 3 Moose 9 hARVESTING ALONG CANOL TRAIL 3 Mobile Core Bathurst Caribou MACKENZIE MOUNTAIN AREA Management Zone 10 AREAS REQUIRING PERMISSION 3 Drone Assisted Hunting 10 Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR) 3 Fur Trappers Notice 11 Gwich’in Settlement Area (GSA) 3 GENERAL INFORMATION 12 Sahtu Settlement Area (SSA) 3 Licence Requirements 13 Hay River Reserve 3 Special Harvester Licences 14 Salt River First Nation Reserve 4 Fees and Salt Plains Reserve No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Annual Report on Official Languages
    TABLED DOCUMENT 176-17(5) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 5, 2014 2013-2014 ANNUAL REPORT ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES Government of the Northwest Territories cover page photo credit: Tsą́kui Theda, Lady of the Falls, NWT Archives/Rene Fumoleau fonds/N-1995-002: 10291 II MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER Language use strengthens cultural identity, and in turn, contributes to student success, healthy families and communities, and increased economic prosperity. The Northwest Territories is home to many different languages and cultures. We recognize 11 official languages: English, French and nine (9) Aboriginal languages. The Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) is committed to the promotion, preservation and revitalization of these languages and to healthy, educated people free from poverty. This year, through the Aboriginal Languages Secretariat, we adopted a new approach to the revitalization and strengthening of Aboriginal languages. Regional Aboriginal Governments are now fully responsible, and funded, to manage their language revitalization. I would like to thank the Grand Chiefs, the Chairperson of the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation and the President of the NWT Métis Nation for their support and cooperation during this time. The transition has been relatively seamless and all Governments are working hard to implement their language plans. In 2013, the GNWT developed the Standards for French Communications and Services after consultation with the Fédération franco-ténoise. They will be used by GNWT employees in the delivery of services in French to the public. The majority of the GNWT Departments have developed 5 year plans to implement the GNWT Strategic Plan on French Language Communications and Services. The 2013-14 Annual Report on Official Languages reviews the progress that we have made in the past year towards the promotion, development, enhancement and delivery of all official languages programs and services.
    [Show full text]
  • SARC Membership/Alternate Biographies
    Membership/Alternate Biographies September 15, 2021 MEMBERS: Expires ALTERNATES: Expires Leon Andrew May 30, 2026 Dr. Deborah Simmons May 30, 2026 (Chairperson1) Dr. Suzanne Carrière March 31, 2025 n/a (Alternate Chairperson) Alestine Andre Feb. 1, 2026 n/a Rosemin Nathoo Jan. 14, 2026 Allison Thompson Jan. 14, 2023 Arthur Beck Sept. 20, 2023 Daniel Beck Sept. 20, 2023 Kaytlin Cooper March 27, 2025 James Firth March 27, 2025 Lynda Yonge March 23, 2022 n/a Moise Rabesca March 15, 2025 Aimee Guile July 19, 2023 Dr. Nicholas (Nic) Larter March 31, 2025 n/a Petter Jacobsen Dec. 19, 2024 n/a MEMBERS: Leon Andrew: Leon is a Shúhtaot'ı̨ nę elder with the Tulı́t’a Dene Band. He is the Research Director and Chair of the Nę K’ǝ Dene Ts'ı̨ l ı̨ (Living on the Land) Forum. He served as a Special Advisor to the Ɂehdzo G o t ’ ı̨ nę G o t s ’ ę ́ Nákedı (Sahtú Renewable Resources Board) for many years. He has been an advisor to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories on Transboundary Water negotiations with Alberta. Leon was an Access and Benefits negotiator and served on the Canol Heritage Trail Committee for the Tulı́t’a District during 2004-2006. He has also served on the Board of the Tulı́t’a Land and Financial Corporation. Leon has provided his research expertise on numerous traditional knowledge studies, assisted and advised GNWT Archeologists from the Prince of Wales Museum, and is also an experienced interpreter in Dene and English languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Reports Prepared for the Board, the Board Has Decided That in Its Opinion
    January 21, 2015 Mr. James Wilson File: MV2014X0027 President Gwich’in Tribal Council 1-3 Council Crescent Box 1509 INUVIK NT X0E 0T0 Fax: (867) 777-7919 Dear Mr. Wilson: Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) - Department of Finance Mackenzie Valley Fibre Optic Link Project - Land Use Permit MV2014X0027 Thank you for your letter received on January 16, 2015 regarding condition 78 of Land Use Permit (Permit) MV2014X0027. In response, the Board wishes to clarify the purpose of condition 78, which relates to the manual clearing of vegetation. In the Application for the Permit, the GNWT – Department of Finance indicated that vegetation will be cleared utilizing D7 caterpillar dozers or an equivalent, which would be equipped with a low ground pressure undercarriage to cut vegetation above the root mat. Vegetation in steep terrain or in environmentally sensitive areas, such as riparian zones, would be cut by hand. The Board included condition 78 in the LUP to address the removal of vegetation in these environmentally sensitive areas. For other areas that were identified in the Application to be cleared, condition 11, which requires bulldozer blades to be equipped with “mushroom” type shoes or other similar devices, applies. The Board also included additional conditions in the Permit to ensure that impacts to the environment from the use of machinery and equipment are minimized. These conditions can be found throughout the Permit, specifically under 26(1)(c) Type and Size of Equipment and 26(1)(d) Methods and Techniques. Please also note that the use of equipment for clearing land has been screened.
    [Show full text]
  • Hay River Reserve
    Northwest Territories Community Wellness in Action: 2002-2003 Summary Report of Community Wellness Initiatives November 2003 Message from the Minister It is my pleasure to present Community Wellness in Action 2002-2003: Summary Report of Community Wellness Initiatives. This report shares information on the many successful community wellness initiatives that were implemented in communities across the Northwest Territories in 2002-2003. It identifies wellness priorities of communities and promotes collaboration and innovation by enabling communities to learn from each other’s wellness activities and experiences. The Department of Health and Social Services and Health Canada have supported communities’ efforts to promote healthier lifestyle choices and increase wellness by making a number of funding programs available. I encourage Northern residents to continue to take advantage of the various funding programs available to them and to participate in wellness activities offered in their communities. J. Michael Miltenberger Minister of Health and Social Services NWT HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES i Table of Contents Introduction. 1 Description of Wellness Programs. 2 Community Wellness in the NWT: Wellness Programs and Funding Agencies . 4 Overview of 2002-2003 Wellness Funding in the NWT . 5 Beaufort Delta Region. 6 Aklavik . 7 Fort McPherson . 9 Holman . 10 Inuvik. 11 Paulatuk. 13 Sachs Harbour . 14 Tsiigehtchic . 15 Tuktoyaktuk . 16 Regional. 17 Deh Cho Region . 18 Nahanni Butte . 19 Fort Providence . 20 Fort Liard . 22 Kakisa . 23 Fort Simpson . 24 Trout Lake . 26 Hay River Reserve. 27 Wrigley . 28 Regional. 29 Dogrib Treaty 11 Region . 30 Rae-Edzo . 31 Wekweti (Snare Lake) . 33 Gameti (Rae Lakes). 34 Wha Ti . 35 Regional.
    [Show full text]
  • SARC Membership/Alternate Biographies
    Membership/Alternate Biographies March 16, 2018 MEMBERS: Expires ALTERNATES: Expires Leon Andrew May 30, 2021 Dr. Deborah Simmons May 30, 2021 (Chairperson1) Dr. Suzanne Carrière April 1, 2020 n/a (Alternate Chairperson) Alestine Andre Jan. 31, 2021 n/a Dr. Allice Legat Jan. 31, 2021 n/a Allison Thompson Jan. 15, 2020 n/a Arthur Beck Sept. 20, 2018 Daniel Beck Sept. 20, 2018 James Firth Mar. 27, 2020 Kaytlin Cooper March 13, 2022 Misty Ireland Sept. 30, 2020 n/a Moise Rabesca Mar. 15, 2020 n/a Dr. Nicholas (Nic) Larter April 1, 2020 n/a Lynda Yonge March 23, 2022 n/a MEMBERS: Leon Andrew: Leon is a Shúhtagot'ı̨ nę elder with the Tulıt́ ’a Dene Band, and currently holds a position on the Board of the Tulıt́ ’a Land and Financial Corporation. He possesses significant expertise of species, habitat, northern ecosystems and conservation in the Sahtú Region drawn from traditional knowledge and community knowledge, as well as cross-cultural knowledge through his considerable experience with scientific inquiry working in collaboration with wildlife biologists. During 2011-2012 he contributed to the Aboriginal Steering Water Stewardship Strategy, and was an advisor to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories on Transboundary Water negotiations with Alberta. Leon was an Access and Benefits negotiator and served on the Canol Heritage 1 Chairperson and Alternate Chairperson are selected for 2-year terms. Current selections expire on May 12, 2019. Trail Committee for the Tulıt́ ’a District during 2004-2006. Leon has provided his research expertise on numerous traditional knowledge studies, assisted and advised a GNWT archaeologist from the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre, and is also an experienced interpreter in Dene and English languages.
    [Show full text]