Evaluating Co-Management in the Sahtu: a Framework for Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluating Co-Management in the Sahtu: a Framework for Analysis UNIVERSTIY OF CALGARY Evaluating Co-management in the Sahtu: A Framework for Analysis by Darwin Bateyko A MASTER’S DEGREE PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE FAC ULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER 2003 © Darwin Bateyko 2003 iii iv THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN The undersigned certify that the y have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Environmental Design for acceptance, a Master's Degree Project entitled Evaluating Co-management in the Sahtu: A Framework for Analysis submitted by Darwin Bateyko in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Design (Environmental Science). __________________________ Prof. Karim-Aly Kassam – Faculty of Communication and Culture Supervisor __________________________ Dr. Norman Simmons – Faculty of Environmental Design (Adjunct) __________________________ Dr. Cormack Gates – Faculty of Environmental Design __________________________ Date: September 26th 2003 v vi Abstract Evaluating Co-management in the Sahtu: A Framework for Analysis Darwin Bateyko September, 2003 A MASTER’S DEGREE PROJECT SUBMITTED TO T HE FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) Supervisor: Professor Karim-Aly Kassam In theory, co-management is defined as a partnership arrangement in which government, the community of local resource users, and other resource stakeholders, share the responsibility and authority for the management of a resource. In practice, however, co- management has been used to describe a number of resource management regimes, ranging from processes that utilize only community consultation, to partnerships that incorporate equal participant decision-making. Under Northern Canadian Land Claim Settlements, co-management commonly involves joint decision making and shared responsibility regarding resource planning and management. Although these resource management boards have the financial and legal backing of Land Claim Agreements, their resource management success is largely dependent on the amount of stakeholder support for the process, the function of internal organization activities, and external factors affecting the co-managed region. This Masters Degree Project proposes and field tests an evaluation framework designed for renewable resource co-management boards and the Sahtu Renewable Resources Board (SRRB) in particular. The framework builds on previous co-management evaluations completed in Northern Canada, as well as other more recent methods of organizational assessment. As a partnership was formed with the SRRB, the framework was tailored to reflect Board input and the specifics of this co-management regime. Field testing this evaluation framework yielded general lessons and suggestions for implementing future co-management assessments, in addition to specific findings and recommendations for the SRRB. Key Words: Co-management, Sahtu Renewable Resources Board, Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement, Northwest Territories, evaluation framework, renewable resource management, collaborative resource management, traditional resource management. vii iii Acknowledgements This research project would not have been possible without the contribution and assistance of a number of individuals, who went beyond the call of duty to provide their expertise, guidance and support. Their contribution greatly enhanced my learning process, as well as the quality of the research contained herein. Therefore, I would like to extend a very special thank to the following people. First, I would like to acknowledge the Sahtu Renewable Resources Board (SRRB) for providing me with the opportunity to conduct this research and the financial support to carry out the presentation of results in the community. The SRRB staff and Board members were crucial to the success of this project, and without their insight, advice, and input, this research would never have been possible. I would also like to acknowledge the many participants in this study for their time and input into the research process, as well as the residents of the Sahtu, for their support while I was in the communities; Mahsi. Second, I would like to acknowledge my supervisory committee for their advice, assistance, and support. Karim-Aly Kassam, Cormack Gates and Norman Simmons provided me with exceptional wisdom and guidance through this MDP process, which strengthened both my educational experience and my research. I would like to extend a very special thank you to my supervisor Karim-Aly Kassam, who has been an important and influential figure throughout my academic career. Without Prof. Kassam’s unfaltering support and continual encouragement, I would never have undertaken a graduate degree. Third, I would like to thank my friends and family for all their encouragement and support during this three-year process. I would especially like to thank Jennifer Cardiff, Cassandra Cardiff and Dustin Bateyko for their understanding and support. iii Finally, I would like to thank my father Peter Bateyko and my late mother Ruth Bateyko for their inspiration and encouragement, without which I would never have achieved the successes that I have. Thank you, once again, for everyone who assisted me in undertaking and completing this graduate degree! Cheers, Darwin Bateyko iv Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................1 1.1 the Task..................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Context of the Research............................................................................................ 4 1.2.1 The Case Study .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 The MDP Outline...................................................................................................... 7 1.4 The Limtiations......................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: Methods and Methodology ..........................................................................11 2.1 Research Methodology........................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Interventionist Approach................................................................................. 12 2.1.2 Academics as citizens ..................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Participatory Research..................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 Dialogical Approach....................................................................................... 13 2.2 Principles and Paradigms: Informing the Framework and Approach................... 14 2.3 Methods................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Literature Review............................................................................................. 15 Collaborative Processes ........................................................................................... 15 Resource Management.............................................................................................. 16 Evaluation Techniques.............................................................................................. 16 Northern Context....................................................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Semi Structured Interviews.............................................................................. 18 2.3.3 Participant Observation.................................................................................... 20 2.4 The Case Study....................................................................................................... 21 2.5 The Findings and the Recommendations ................................................................ 22 Chapter 3: Northern Context .........................................................................................23 3.1 An Historical Overview of the Development of North Western Canada ............... 24 3.2 The Land Claim Agreement.................................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Negotiating the Claim ...................................................................................... 27 3.2.2 The Spirit of the Land Claim Agreement ........................................................ 29 3.2.3 The Sahtu Region........................................................................................... 30 The Districts.............................................................................................................. 30 3.3 The Residents and the Communities....................................................................... 31 3.3.1 Organizations created under the Land Claim Agreement................................ 33 3.4 Conclusion.............................................................................................................. 37 Chapter 4: Resource Management.................................................................................39 4.1 Resource Management...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    SC-20/CONF.232/10 29 September 2020 Original English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION International Coordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme Thirty-second session Online meeting 27th- 28th October 2020 ITEM OF THE PROVISIONAL AGENDA: Presentation of the Technical Guidelines for Biosphere Reserves 1. At its 27th session, the MAB International Coordinating Council (MAB-ICC) decided the development of Technical Guidelines for Biosphere Reserves (referred as TGBR thereafter) and entrusted the MAB Secretariat for this endeavour. The MAB Secretariat reported on the progress of the development of the TGBR since the 29th session of the MAB-ICC1. 2. The TGBR will enable Member States and the MAB Council to respond more appropriately and timely to the various practical challenges and technical questions encountered in the implementation of the Seville Strategy and the articles of the Statutory Framework of World Network of Biosphere Reserve (WNBR). By providing critical information and clarification on the WNBR, the TGBR fosters the implementation of current - MAB strategy (2015-2025), the Lima Action Plan (2016- 2025) - and future Strategies and Action Plans. 3. The TGBR will be an open access web-based living document compiling contributions and experiences from the MAB community on specific items. As the TGBR cannot answer all the possible questions and needs, it is flexible and will be periodically updated and used preferably with the TGBR support webpage, where references to discussed topics can be shared in more detail. 4. In support of the drafting process of the TGBR, the MAB Council decided to establish a TGBR-working group (TGBR-WG) to support the work of the MAB Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands Regional Contacts
    LANDS REGIONAL CONTACTS Beaufort-Delta Region 86 Duck Lake Road ³ Bag Service #1 Inuvik, NT X0E 0T0 Telephone: 867-777-8900 Fax: 867-777-2090 E-mail: [email protected] Sahtu Region 31 Forrestry Drive Northern Cartrols Building Beaufort-Delta Box 126 Norman Wells, NT X0E 0V0 Telephone: 867-587-7200 Fax: 867-587-2928 E-mail: [email protected] Dehcho Region Regional Education Centre, 2nd Floor PO Box 150 Fort Simpson, NT X0E 0N0 Telephone: 867-695-2626 Ext. 202 Fax: 867-695-2615 e-mail: [email protected] Beaufort Sea North Slave Region Sachs Harbour 140 Bristol Avenue !( 16 Yellowknife Airport (mailing) Yellowknife, NT X1A 3T2 Telephone: 867-767-9187 Ext. 24185 Fax: 867-873-9754 E-mail: [email protected] South Slave Region Ulukhaktok !( 136 Simpson Street Tuktoyaktuk !( Evergreen Building Box 658 Fort Smith, NT X0E 0P0 Manager, Resource Management Telephone: 867-872-4343 Ext. 23 Aklavik Paulatuk !( Inuvik !( !( Donald Arey Fax: 867-872-3472 867-777-8906 E-mail: [email protected] Hay River Area Office Fort McPherson !( Tsiigehtchic Suite 203, 41 Capital Drive !( N.W Government of Canada Building .T. Yu kon Hay River, NT X0E 0R0 Telephone: 867-874-6995 Ext. 21 Fax: 867-874-2460 E-mail: [email protected] Colville Lake !( Fort Good Hope !( Manager, Resource Management Katherine Ades 867-587-7205 LEGEND LANDS Regional Boundaries M Great a c k Bear 0 20 40 80 120 e n z Sahtu Lake 1:2,100,000 KILOMETERS ie R iv DISCLAIMER !( e Norman Wells r THIS MAP IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016
    TABLED DOCUMENT 230-18(2) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 3, 2016 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2015 – 2016 November 2016 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree ch yat k . w n w , ts n . ch Ɂ ht s n n yat t a h ts k a y yat th at , n w ts n y t . Chipewyan n h h t hat k at h nah h n na ts ah . South Slavey K hsh t n k h ht y n w n . North Slavey ii wan ak i hii in k at at i hch hit yin hthan , iits t in hkh i. Gwich in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Aboriginal Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ....................................................................................................................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Preface .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Natural Nt and Natural Resources
    ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Implementation Plan for the Action Plan for Boreal Woodland Caribou in the Northwest Territories: 2010-2015 The Action Plan for Boreal Woodland Caribou Conservation in the Northwest Territories was released after consulting with Management Authorities, Aboriginal organizations, communities, and interested stakeholders. This Implementation Plan is the next step of the Action Plan and will be used by Environment and Natural Resources to implement the actions in cooperation with the Tᰯch Government, Wildlife Management Boards and other stakeholders. In the future, annual status reports will be provided detailing the progress of the actions undertaken and implemented by Environment and Natural Resources. Implementation of these 21 actions will contribute to the national recovery effort for boreal woodland caribou under the federal Species at Risk Act . Implementation of certain actions will be coordinated with Alberta as part of our mutual obligations outlined in the signed Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation on Managing Shared Boreal Populations of Woodland Caribou. This MOU acknowledges boreal caribou are a species at risk that are shared across jurisdictional lines and require co-operative management. J. Michael Miltenberger Minister Environment and Natural Resources IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Environment and Natural Resources Boreal Woodland Caribou Conservation in the Northwest Territories 2010–2015 July 2010 1 Headquarters Inuvik Sahtu North Slave Dehcho South Slave Action Initiative Involvement Region Region Region Region Region 1 Prepare and implement Co-lead the Dehcho Not currently Currently not Not currently To be developed To be developed comprehensive boreal caribou Boreal Caribou Working needed. needed. needed. by the Dehcho by the Dehcho range management plans in Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbour News
    Fall 2018 Neighbour news Operation update - restart underway Imperial is planning to restart production at the Norman Wells operation following the return to service of the Enbridge pipeline, which transports oil produced at the site to market. It is expected that the field will restart in October. Enbridge replaced a section of the pipeline that runs under the Mackenzie River near Fort Simpson as a precaution. Construction was completed in August, with testing and final start-up work completed through September. “The Norman Wells operation is restarting after a nearly two-year shutdown,” said Kevin Gant, operations superintendent. “During this time, we worked to maintain the safety and integrity of these facilities. I am very proud of the dedication and hard work by our employees and contractors to achieve this goal.” A community celebration is being planned after the restart to mark this milestone. Over 100 employees and contractors are working at the facility, a return to Wade Charney and Brad Menacho, Northern Development Program trainees from the Sahtu, are supporting the normal levels for day-to-day operations. Imperial has hired three Northern Norman Wells operation. Development Program trainees from the Sahtu to support the operation. “We appreciate the support of the local community and Sahtu groups during this extended shutdown,” said Gant. “During this time, Imperial has maintained community investment and scholarship programs and the return to regular operations will increase local economic benefits, including suppliers and service industries.” National Indigenous Peoples Day Imperial was a proud sponsor of National Indigenous Peoples Day in Norman Wells on June 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim
    Annual Report of the Implementation Committee April 1, 2000–March 31, 2001 Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement 2001 Annual Report Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2001 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca QS-5354-021-BB-A1 Catalogue No. R31-10/2001 ISBN 0-662-66189-3 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada foreword The Implementation Committee is pleased to provide its annual report describes achievements and developments seventh annual report on the implementation of the Sahtu during the year. Information is contributed by various federal Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement. The and territorial departments, the SSI and other bodies estab- report covers the fiscal year from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. lished under the Agreement. The Implementation Committee comprises a senior official from We are committed to strengthening the partnerships that are each of the parties: the Sahtu Secretariat Incorporated (SSI), key to the successful implementation of this Agreement. Our the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) and achievements to date are the product of partners working the Government of Canada. It functions by consensus and together to recognize Aboriginal rights in an atmosphere of serves as a forum where parties can raise issues and voice mutual respect, and the commitment of the parties to fulfil obli- their concerns. gations pursuant to this Agreement. The role of the Implementation Committee is to oversee, direct and monitor implementation of the Agreement. This John Tutcho Mark Warren Aideen Nabigon Sahtu Secretariat Government of the Government of Incorporated Northwest Territories Canada 2000–2001 Annual Report | i table of contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • Fostering Community-Based Wildlife Health Monitoring and Research in the Canadian North
    EcoHealth DOI: 10.1007/s10393-009-0256-7 Ó 2009 International Association for Ecology and Health Original Contribution Fostering Community-Based Wildlife Health Monitoring and Research in the Canadian North Ryan K. Brook,1,2 Susan J. Kutz,1 Alasdair M. Veitch,3 Richard A. Popko,3 Brett T. Elkin,4 and Glen Guthrie5 1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada 3Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Sahtu Region, Government of the Northwest Territories, Norman Wells, NT, Canada 4Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Wildlife & Fisheries, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada 5Sahtu Renewable Resources Board, Norman Wells, NT, Canada Abstract: Many northern Canadians have continued a subsistence lifestyle of wildlife harvesting and, therefore, value sustainable wildlife populations. At a regional wildlife workshop in the Sahtu Settlement Area, Northwest Territories in 2002, elders and community leaders raised concerns regarding wildlife health, food safety, and the effects of climate change on wildlife. They requested that efforts be put toward training youth in science and increasing involvement of hunters and youth in wildlife research. In response, we initiated a long-term, integrated approach to foster community-based wildlife health monitoring and research. Annual trips were made to all schools in the Sahtu from 2003 to 2009 to provide hands-on learning for 250–460 students on a range of wildlife topics. In addition, interviews were conducted with 31 hunters and elders to document their local ecological knowledge of wildlife health and local hunters were trained as monitors to collect tissue samples and measurements to assess body condition and monitor health of harvested caribou (n = 69) and moose (n = 19).
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report
    Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report July 2010 July 2010 Page 1 Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report: The Sahtu Settlement Area The Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report The Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report, from now on referred to as the “Background Report”, is intended to capture some of the main characteristics of the Sahtu Settlement Area (SSA), its people, the culture, special places, the biophysical environment, the economy and the regulatory regime. Above all, the Background Report should help readers better understand the Sahtu and the reports and information that were considered in the development, decisions, and planning that resulted in the Sahtu Land Use Plan (SLUP). Introduction The Sahtu Land Use Plan was written by taking into account the three pillars of sustainability: socio-cultural, economic and ecological factors. These three domains are now commonly considered part of a balanced approach to decision-making. The background report is an attempt to briefly describe some of the social, cultural, economic and ecological factors that the Sahtu Land Use Planning Board (SLUPB) has considered in its decision making. INAC’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2007-2010 describes sustainable communities as those which “enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and just society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations.”1 The Sahtu Land Use Planning Board has sought to develop a balanced plan for the Sahtu Settlement Area (SSA) by considering a diversity of resources under each of the three pillars. A summary of the sources used and a general description of the Sahtu Settlement Area follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Sahtu Indigenous Scholarship Program Forms an Norman Wells Operation
    Sahtu Indigenous Description scholarship Imperial’s Norman Wells operation offers these scholarships each year to Sahtu beneficiaries entering post-secondary studies. program The award is designed to cover tuition, other compulsory fees, text books and supplies, while also assisting with living expenses during the course of the academic year. Imperial is committed to The maximum amount of the award is $3,500 per year for college and increasing the number of technical schools and $4,500 per year for university. Indigenous employees in our operations. As part of this Purpose commitment, we’ve The purpose of the scholarship program is to encourage and assist established the Sahtu Sahtu beneficiaries to pursue undergraduate post-secondary studies Indigenous Scholarship in disciplines relevant to the petroleum industry and Imperial’s Program for prospective Norman Wells operation. employees at Imperial’s In conjunction with other recruitment and on the job training programs, the Sahtu Indigenous Scholarship Program forms an Norman Wells operation. important part of Imperial’s strategy for increasing the employment of Sahtu beneficiaries at Imperial’s Norman Wells operation. Eligibility requirements • Be a Sahtu beneficiary. • Maintain residency in the Northwest Territories. • Enrolment in disciplines relevant to the Norman Wells operation will be considered a priority. Relevant disciplines include but are not limited to: engineering, geology, geophysics, accounting, computer science, business administration and petroleum technologies. • Be registered as a full time student in a recognized educational institution. WB00432a 20 08 Guidelines How to apply • Grades, course load and attendance must be Completed applications along with maintained in order to continue to receive required documents must be received at the scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline Project Preliminary Information Packagefor the Northern Gas Pipeline Project Volume I Table of Contents
    A- 54967 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR THE NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE PROJECT PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PACKAGEFOR THE NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE PROJECT VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 .. A . Project Descrlptlon................................................................................................................. 1 B. Capital Structure. .................................................................................................................... 4 C . Consortium Approach............................................................................................................ 5 D . Aboriginal Ownership and Benefits....................................................................................... 5 E . Tolls and Access ..................................................................................................................... 6 F . Alaska ..................................................................................................................................... 7 G . Regulatory Matters................................................................................................................. 7 H . Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 8 I1 . PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 9
    [Show full text]
  • Central Mackenzie Surface Water and Groundwater Baseline Assessment
    May 21, 2015 Central Mackenzie Surface Water and Groundwater Baseline Assessment REPORT 2: PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Submitted to: Bruce Hanna Regional Science Coordinator Government of the Northwest Territories 867-920-6520 [email protected] Report Number: 1401835 Final Report 2 Distribution: REPORT GNWT - 5 copies Golder - 1 copy CENTRAL MACKENZIE SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER BASELINE ASSESSMENT - PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.1 Surface Water Quantity (Hydrology) .................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People, Land, and Pipelines: Perspectives on Resource Decision-Making Processes in the Sahtu Region, Northwest Territories
    University of Alberta People, Land, and Pipelines: Perspectives on Resource Decision-Making Processes in the Sahtu Region, Northwest Territories by Carly A. Dokis A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anthropology © Carly A. Dokis Spring 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60502-8 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60502-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]