DOCSLIB.ORG

New Light on the Book of Daniel from the Dead Sea Scrolls

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Faculty Publications 1-1-1992 New Light on the Book of Daniel From the Dead Sea Scrolls Gerhard F. Hasel Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hasel, Gerhard F., "New Light on the Book of Daniel From the Dead Sea Scrolls" (1992). Faculty Publications. 3627. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/3627 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New light on the book of Daniel from the Dead Sea scrolls ecently two articles unpublished. More than 40 years later a Gerhard F. Hasel of vital interest on the coterie of dawdling scholars is still spin Hebrew and Aramaic ning out the work while the world waits texts of the book of and the precious pieces lapse into dust."6 Daniel 1 were pub Fortunately, various encouraging de R lished from among velopments have taken place since the the Dead Sea scroll summer of 1991, and we can look for textual finds made originally in 1952 in ward to a speedy publication of the re Cave 4 at Qumran. The publication by maining scroll fragments and texts. Professor Eugene Ulrich, "Daniel Manu The significance of the Daniel frag scripts From Qumran," 2 gives us full ments of the Dead Sea scrolls was voiced Recent publications insight into these pivotal textual finds and first in 1958 when Professor Frank M. follows the one published two years ear Cross of Harvard University published of Dead Sea scrolls lier on other parts of these finds.3 qÜÉ=^ åÅáÉåí=iáÄê~êó=çÑ=n ì ã ê~åI=a com prehensive survey of the scrolls. In the confirm the From discovery until publication second edition of the book (1961), Pro Let me first briefly describe the outra fessor Cross refers to the fragments of the authenticity and the geous delay that has occurred in the pub Daniel scrolls: "One copy of Daniel is lication of many of the Dead Sea scrolls, inscribed in the script of the late second earlier dating for the discovered way back in 1947-1948. _áÄ= century B.C.; in some ways it is more book of Daniel. äáÅ~ ä=^êÅÜ~ÉçäçÖó=oÉîáÉï=E_ ^ o F= has striking than that of the oldest manu played a major role in pushing for publi scripts from Qumran." 7 cation a number of articles over the past This was fantastic news from a schol few years, especially in 1989 and 1990.4 arly point of view, for the text of Daniel There have been charges of a scandal has long been considered suspect by many because there are about "400 separate scholars on various grounds we'll be unpublished texts arranged on 1,200 dif discussing below. The question now was: ferent [photographic] plates" hidden for How much of the book of Daniel is on this some 40 years from the scrutiny of the scroll, and precisely what sections are scholars. Hershel Shanks, the editor of preserved and how does it compare with dÉêÜ~êÇ=e~ëÉäI=mÜa KI _^oI=says that "a reasonable guess is that the rest of the Hebrew text of the book of áë =éêçÑÉëëçê=çÑ=läÇ= 100 of these [unpublished texts] are bib Daniel? qÉëí~ã Éåí=~í=íÜÉ= lical texts on 200 plates." 5 In November 1989, more than 35 qÜÉçäçÖáÅ~ä=pÉãáå~êóI= The charges regarding the years after its discovery and more than 25 ^ åÇêÉï ë=r åáîÉêëáíóI= nonpublication of these Dead Sea scroll _ÉêêáÅå=péêáåÖëI= years after Cross made his astounding j áÅÜáÖ~åK texts were taken up in the summer of 1989 declaration, this text, along with others by the public press. For example, the from Cave 4 on the book of Daniel, have New York qáãÉë=in a July 9,1989, edito finally been published. Only a few scraps rial, "The Vanity of Scholars," complained of fragments from Cave 4, which contain that "the scrolls were discovered in 1947, but "five tiny fragments, all from the but many that are in fragments remain prayer in chapter 9 but none with more 10 MINISTRY/JANUARY/1992 than one complete word," 8 remain to be materials discovered in three of the 11 published (i.e., the fragments of the scroll caves of Qumran. In order to appreciate designated 4QDane). the significance of this fact, we need to For those supporting The fragments of the Daniel scrolls compare it with the manuscript finds of from Cave 4 were assigned for publica other biblical books from the same caves. the historical-critical tion to Cross9 as long ago as 1951. 10 He To my knowledge, the most recent was a member of the original group of listing of published materials from the date of the book of editors of the Dead Sea scrolls appointed Dead Sea scrolls appeared in 1977. The Daniel, new issues in 1953. 11 But some time ago Cross listing speaks of 13 fragments of scrolls entrusted the Daniel materials from Cave from the Psalms; nine from Exodus; eight are being raised. 4 to Eugene Ulrich of the University of from Deuteronomy; five from Leviticus; Notre Dame, 12 a former student of his. In four each from Genesis and Isaiah; 17 and 1987 Ulrich published the materials from no fewer than eight scrolls representing one scroll of Cave 4, namely, 4QDana . Daniel. Although we have no sure knowl preserved in a good, hardly changed form. Now he has published the materials of the edge yet of the total scrolls that have been They are thus a valuable witness to the two other major scrolls, 4QDanb and preserved from the Bible at Qumran, it is great faithfulness with which the sacred 4QDan . At last we are able to see with evident from this comparison that the text has been transmitted." 22 These tex our own eyes! book of Daniel was a favorite book among tual witnesses demonstrate that the MT the Qumran covenanters. 18 was faithfully preserved and confirm that Contents of the Dead Sea scroll Daniel At this juncture we need to make the Hebrew and Aramaic text of Daniel is manuscripts another point. According to current his reliable. While these exciting new publications torical-critical opinion, the book of Daniel The date for the three Daniel manu will have our major attention in this pa originated in its present form in the scripts most recently published is also of per, we need to mention the other previ Antiochus Epiphanes crisis, that is, be great importance, along with those of the ously published Qumran materials on tween 168/167-165/164 B.C. It seems earlier publications. Some of the re Daniel. very difficult to perceive that one single cently published scrolls on Daniel are In 1955 D. Barthelemy published two desert community should have preserved even older than the previously published scroll fragments: 13 lQDana and lQDanb . such a significant number of Daniel manu ones. The date of 4QDana is assigned to These contain parts of 22 verses from scripts if this book had really been about 60 B.C. 23 and 4QDanb to about 60 Daniel 1-3, that is, Daniel 1:10-17; 2:2-6 produced at so late a date. The large A.D. 24 The oldest manuscript of Daniel (lQDana); and 3:22-30 (lQDanb). number of manuscripts in this commu by far is 4QDanc , which Cross dated in In 1962 Maurice Baillet published a nity can be much better explained if one 1961 to the "late second century B.C." 25 papyrus fragment from Cave 6, contain accepts an earlier origin of Daniel than Scholars who support a date for the writ ing possibly parts of Daniel 8:16, 17, 21, the one proposed by the Maccabean hy ing of the book of Daniel in the Maccabean 22; and clearly 10:8-16; 11:33-36, 38. 14 pothesis of historical-critical scholarship, crisis at about the middle of the second The most extensively preserved scroll which dates it to the second century B.C. century B.C. will be able to say that of the book of Daniel from Qumran is one 4QDanc is "only a half century later than from Cave 4: 4QDana , which contains Date of the Daniel Dead Sea scrolls and the composition of the book of Daniel."26 large portions of Daniel. Preserved are its significance This means for supporters of this dating parts of Daniel 1:16-20; 2:9-11, 19-49; Dates for the Daniel scrolls, pub that the manuscript evidence for Daniel is 3:1,2; 4:29, 30; 5:5-7,12-14,16-19; 7:5- lished in 1955, were given by John C. as close to the autograph as the Rylands 7,25-28;8:1-5; 10:16-20; 11:13-16. Scroll Trever as the Herodian period for 1 QDana papyrus is to the Gospel of John. I quote: 4QDanb contains Daniel 5:10-12, 14-16, and late Herodian period for IQDan". 19 "It is thus, for the Hebrew Bible, compa 19-22; 6:8-22,27-29; 7:1-6,11(7), 26-28; In other words, these manuscripts could rable to the Rylands manuscript of the 8:1-8,13-16; and 4QDanc has Daniel 10:5- come from about 60 A.D. 20 or earlier.
Recommended publications
  • Frank Moore Cross's Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls

    Frank Moore Cross's Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Classics and Religious Studies Department 2014 Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls" (2014). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 127. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/127 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford This paper examines the impact of Frank Moore Cross on the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Since Cross was a member of the original editorial team responsible for publishing the Cave 4 materials, his influence on the field was vast. The article is limited to those areas of Scrolls study not covered in other articles; the reader is referred especially to the articles on palaeography and textual criticism for further discussion of Cross’s work on the Scrolls. t is difficult to overestimate the impact the discovery They icturedp two columns of a manuscript, columns of of the Dead Sea Scrolls had on the life and career of the Book of Isaiah .
  • Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access

    Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access

    690 American Archivist / Vol. 56 / Fall 1993 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/56/4/690/2748590/aarc_56_4_w213201818211541.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Question of Access SARA S. HODSON Abstract: The announcement by the Huntington Library in September 1991 of its decision to open for unrestricted research its photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls touched off a battle of wills between the library and the official team of scrolls editors, as well as a blitz of media publicity. The action was based on a commitment to the principle of intellectual freedom, but it must also be considered in light of the ethics of donor agreements and of access restrictions. The author relates the story of the events leading to the Huntington's move and its aftermath, and she analyzes the issues involved. About the author: Sara S. Hodson is curator of literary manuscripts at the Huntington Library. Her articles have appeared in Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship, Dictionary of Literary Biography Yearbook, and the Huntington Library Quarterly. This article is revised from a paper delivered before the Manuscripts Repositories Section meeting of the 1992 Society of American Archivists conference in Montreal. The author wishes to thank William A. Moffett for his encour- agement and his thoughtful and invaluable review of this article in its several revisions. Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls 691 ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1991, THE HUNTINGTON scrolls for historical scholarship lies in their LIBRARY set off a media bomb of cata- status as sources contemporary with the time clysmic proportions when it announced that they illuminate.
  • The Dead Sea Scrolls

    The Dead Sea Scrolls

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2000 The eD ad Sea Scrolls: Questions and Responses for Latter-day Saints Donald W. Parry Stephen D. Ricks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Parry, Donald W. and Ricks, Stephen D., "The eD ad Sea Scrolls: Questions and Responses for Latter-day Saints" (2000). Maxwell Institute Publications. 25. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/25 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Preface What is the Copper Scroll? Do the Dead Sea Scrolls contain lost books of the Bible? Did John the Baptist study with the people of Qumran? What is the Temple Scroll? What about DNA research and the scrolls? We have responded to scores of such questions on many occasions—while teaching graduate seminars and Hebrew courses at Brigham Young University, presenting papers at professional symposia, and speaking to various lay audiences. These settings are always positive experiences for us, particularly because they reveal that the general membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a deep interest in the scrolls and other writings from the ancient world. The nonbiblical Dead Sea Scrolls are of great import because they shed much light on the cultural, religious, and political position of some of the Jews who lived shortly before and during the time of Jesus Christ.
  • 4Qmmt) and Its Addressee(S)

    4Qmmt) and Its Addressee(S)

    CHAPTER FOUR TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: MIQSAṬ MAʿAŚE HA-TORAH (4QMMT) AND ITS ADDRESSEE(S) 1. Introduction Long before its official publication in 1994,1 and even before its debut in 1984,2 4QMMT had been characterized as a polemical communi- cation (or “letter”) between the sectarian leadership of the Qumran community, or some precursor, and the mainstream priestly or Phari- saic leadership in Jerusalem.3 This framing of the document overall 1 Elisha Qimron and John Strugnell, Qumran Cave 4. V: Miqsaṭ Maʿaśe Ha-Torah (DJD X; Oxford: Clarendon, 1994), henceforth referred to as DJD X. 2 See articles jointly authored by Qimron and Strugnell in next note. 3 For a concise statement of the generally held view of 4QMMT, see James C. VanderKam, The Dead Sea Scrolls Today (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1994), 59–60. The earliest notices of 4QMMT are as follows: Pierre Benoit et al., “Editing the Manuscript Fragments from Qumran,” BA 19 (1956): 94 (report of John Strugnell, August 1955; the same in French in RB 63 [1956]: 65); Józef T. Milik, Ten Years of Discovery in the Wilderness of Judea (trans. J. Strugnell; London: SCM, 1959; French orig., 1957), 41, 130; idem, “Le travail d’édition des manuscrits du Désert de Juda,” in Volume du Congrès, Strasbourg 1956 (VTSup 4; Leiden: Brill, 1957), 24; idem, in DJD III (1962): 225; Joseph M. Baumgarten, “The Pharisaic-Sadducean Controversies about Purity and the Qumran Texts,” JJS 31 (1980): 163–64; Yigael Yadin, ed., The Temple Scroll (3 vols.; Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1983), 2.213; Elisha Qim- ron and John Strugnell, “An Unpublished Halakhic Letter from Qumran,” in Biblical Archaeology Today: Proceedings of the International Congress on Biblical Archaeology, Jerusalem, April 1984 (ed.
  • The End of an Era Frank Moore Cross (1921-2012)

    The End of an Era Frank Moore Cross (1921-2012)

    This article is reproduced by the Society of Biblical Literature with permission from Biblical Archaeology Review. The End of an Era Frank Moore Cross (1921-2012) Hershel Shanks • 10/18/2012 There will be a memorial service for Professor Cross in Memorial Church in Harvard Yard on Saturday, November 10th, at 4:00 p.m. We knew it would happen, but it’s still a shock. Frank Cross is dead. I will leave it to scholars to write of his scholarly accomplishments. I will only write of what I know: He stood at the very pinnacle of the profession, universally respected and admired. When he spoke, others stood in awe. The Hancock Professor of Hebrew and Other Oriental Languages at Harvard University, the third oldest endowed academic chair in the United States, Cross was a specialist in the Dead Sea Scrolls, in obscure ancient languages, in the science of dating ancient inscriptions based on the shape of the letters, in the Biblical text and in archaeology, to name but a few. I’ve been at this desk for almost 40 years and by now I can comfortably engage with senior colleagues. In the early years, however, I was a newcomer. I was a lawyer who had never taken a course in archaeology or even in the Bible. In those days, I divided scholars into two categories—those who welcomed novices like me and the other kind, who looked at me from their empyrean heights. Frank was clearly in the former group and I valued his friendship more than I can say.
  • Preliminary Studies in the Judaean Desert Isaiah Scrolls and Fragments

    Preliminary Studies in the Judaean Desert Isaiah Scrolls and Fragments

    INCORPORATING SYNTAX INTO THEORIES OF TEXTUAL TRANSMISSION: PRELIMINARY STUDIES IN THE JUDAEAN DESERT ISAIAH SCROLLS AND FRAGMENTS by JAMES M. TUCKER A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Master of Arts in Biblical Studies We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard ............................................................................... Dr. Martin G. Abegg Jr., Ph.D.; Thesis Supervisor ................................................................................ Dr. Dirk Büchner, Ph.D.; Second Reader TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY Date (August, 2014) © James M. Tucker TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Sigla i Abstract iv Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.0. Introduction: A Statement of the Problem 1 1.1. The Goal and Scope of the Thesis 5 Chapter 2: Methodological Issues in the Transmission Theories of the Hebrew Bible: The Need for Historical Linguistics 7 2.0. The Use of the Dead Sea Scrolls Evidence for Understanding The History of ! 7 2.1. A Survey and Assessment of Transmission Theories 8 2.1.1. Frank Moore Cross and the Local Text Theory 10 2.1.1.1. The Central Premises of the Local Text Theory 11 2.1.1.2. Assessment of the Local Text Theory 14 2.1.2. Shemaryahu Talmon and The Multiple Text Theory 16 2.1.2.1. The Central Premises of the Multiple Texts Theory 17 2.1.2.2. Assessment of Multiple Text Theory 20 2.1.3. Emanuel Tov and The Non-Aligned Theory 22 2.1.3.1 The Central Premises of the Non-Aligned Theory 22 2.1.3.2. Assessment of the Non-Aligned Theory 24 2.1.4.
  • Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies

    Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies

    0 Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies Bibliography largely taken from Dr. James R. Davila's annotated bibliographies: http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/~www_sd/otpseud.html. I have changed formatting, added the section on 'Online works,' have added a sizable amount to the secondary literature references in most of the categories, and added the Table of Contents. - Lee Table of Contents Online Works……………………………………………………………………………………………...02 General Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...…03 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………....03 Translations of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha in Collections…………………………………….…03 Guide Series…………………………………………………………………………………………….....04 On the Literature of the 2nd Temple Period…………………………………………………………..........04 Literary Approaches and Ancient Exegesis…………………………………………………………..…...05 On Greek Translations of Semitic Originals……………………………………………………………....05 On Judaism and Hellenism in the Second Temple Period…………………………………………..…….06 The Book of 1 Enoch and Related Material…………………………………………………………….....07 The Book of Giants…………………………………………………………………………………..……09 The Book of the Watchers…………………………………………………………………………......….11 The Animal Apocalypse…………………………………………………………………………...………13 The Epistle of Enoch (Including the Apocalypse of Weeks)………………………………………..…….14 2 Enoch…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..15 5-6 Ezra (= 2 Esdras 1-2, 15-16, respectively)……………………………………………………..……..17 The Treatise of Shem………………………………………………………………………………..…….18 The Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37-71)…………………………………………………………..…...18 The
  • Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Publications of Museum of the Bible

    Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Publications of Museum of the Bible

    Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Publications of Museum of the Bible General Editor Michael W. Holmes volume 1 Semitic Texts Editor Emanuel Tov Managing Editor Jerry A. Pattengale The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/pmb Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Edited by Emanuel Tov Kipp Davis Robert Duke leiden | boston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Tov, Emanuel, editor. | Davis, Kipp, editor. | Duke, Robert R., editor. Title: Dead sea scrolls fragments in the Museum collection / edited by Emanuel Tov, Kipp Davis, Robert Duke. Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016] | Series: Publications of Museum of the Bible, ISSN 2214-2797 ; volume 1 Identifiers: LCCN 2016015778 (print) | LCCN 2016016485 (ebook) | ISBN 9789004321489 ((hardback) : alk. paper) | ISBN 9789004322868 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Dead Sea scrolls. Classification: LCC BM487 .D44957 2016 (print) | LCC BM487 (ebook) | DDC 296.1/55074753–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016015778 Want or need Open Access? Brill Open offers you the choice to make your research freely accessible online in exchange for a publication charge. Review your various options on brill.com/brill-open. Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 2214-2797 isbn 978-90-04-32148-9 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-32286-8 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
  • What Scriptures Or Bible Nearest to Original Hebrew Scriptures? Anong Biblia Ang Pinaka-Malapit Sa Kasulatang Hebreo

    What Scriptures Or Bible Nearest to Original Hebrew Scriptures? Anong Biblia Ang Pinaka-Malapit Sa Kasulatang Hebreo

    WHAT BIBLE TO READ WHAT SCRIPTURES OR BIBLE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES? ANONG BIBLIA ANG PINAKA-MALAPIT SA KASULATANG HEBREO KING JAMES BIBLE OLD TESTAMENT IS THE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES BECAUSE THE OLD TESTAMENT WAS DIRECTLY TRANSLATED FROM HEBREW COLUMN OF ORIGENS’S HEXAPLA. KING JAMES BIBLE ALSO WAS COMPARED TO NEWLY FOUND DEAD SEA SCROLL WITH CLOSE AND VERY NEAR TRANSLATION TO THE TEXT FOUND ON DEAD SEA SCROLL ni Isagani Datu-Aca Tabilog WHAT SCRIPTURES OR BIBLE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES? KING JAMES BIBLE OLD TESTAMENT IS THE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES BECAUSE THE OLD TESTAMENT WAS DIRECTLY TRANSLATED FROM HEBREW COLUMN OF ORIGENS’S HEXAPLA. KING JAMES BIBLE ALSO WAS COMPARED TO NEWLY FOUND DEAD SEA SCROLL WITH CLOSE AND VERY NEAR TRANSLATION TO THE TEXT FOUND ON DEAD SEA SCROLL Original King Iames Bible 1611 See the Sacred Name YAHWEH in modern Hebrew name on top of the Front Cover 1 HEXAPLA FIND THE DIFFERENCE OF DOUAI BIBLE VS. KING JAMES BIBLE Genesis 6:1-4 Genesis 17:9-14 Isaiah 53:8 Luke 4:17-19 AND MANY MORE VERSES The King James Version (KJV), commonly known as the Authorized Version (AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed in 1611. First printed by the King's Printer Robert Barker, this was the third translation into English to be approved by the English Church authorities. The first was the Great Bible commissioned in the reign of King Henry VIII, and the second was the Bishops' Bible of 1568.
  • The Valediction of Moses

    The Valediction of Moses

    Forschungen zum Alten Testament Edited by Konrad Schmid (Zürich) · Mark S. Smith (Princeton) Hermann Spieckermann (Göttingen) · Andrew Teeter (Harvard) 145 Idan Dershowitz The Valediction of Moses A Proto-Biblical Book Mohr Siebeck Idan Dershowitz: born 1982; undergraduate and graduate training at the Hebrew University, following several years of yeshiva study; 2017 elected to the Harvard Society of Fellows; currently Chair of Hebrew Bible and Its Exegesis at the University of Potsdam. orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-8504 Open access sponsored by the Julis-Rabinowitz Program on Jewish and Israeli Law at the Harvard Law School. ISBN 978-3-16-160644-1 / eISBN 978-3-16-160645-8 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-160645-8 ISSN 0940-4155 / eISSN 2568-8359 (Forschungen zum Alten Testament) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This work is licensed under the license “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Inter- national” (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). A complete Version of the license text can be found at: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Any use not covered by the above license is prohibited and illegal without the permission of the publisher. The book was printed on non-aging paper by Gulde Druck in Tübingen, and bound by Buch- binderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the generosity of my friends, family, and colleagues. The Harvard Society of Fellows provided the ideal environment for this ven- ture.Atatimeinwhichacademiaisbecomingincreasinglyriskaverse,theSociety remains devoted to supporting its fellows’ passion projects.
  • Dead Sea Scrolls (3 Books) Eileen M

    Dead Sea Scrolls (3 Books) Eileen M

    Consensus Volume 20 Article 13 Issue 1 A Ministry Miscellany 5-1-1994 Dead Sea Scrolls (3 books) Eileen M. Schuller Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus Recommended Citation Schuller, Eileen M. (1994) "Dead Sea Scrolls (3 books)," Consensus: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 13. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus/vol20/iss1/13 This Book Reviews is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consensus by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. — Book Reviews 121 Understanding the Dead Sea Scrolls Hershel Shanks, editor New York: Random House, 1992 Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls James H. Charlesworth, editor Anchor Reference Bible Library Series New York: Doubleday, 1992 Responses to 101 Questions on the Dead Sea Scrolls Joseph A. Fitzmyer New York: Paulist Press, 1992 Now some forty-five years after the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is still considerable interest in these ancient texts. In the last four or five years, there has been a rash of articles in the popular media T.V., radio, church periodicals. New York Times, National Enquirer—often focusing on the most sensational ideas or theories. At the other end of the spectrum, there is an ongoing stream of very technical writing, in scholarly journals such as Revue de Qumran and in collections of papers from major international Qumran conferences. But what has been lacking are works of substance, geared to the general reader, which can treat the issues with the depth and subtlety which they deserve.
  • John and Qumran: Discovery and Interpretation Over Sixty Years Paul N

    John and Qumran: Discovery and Interpretation Over Sixty Years Paul N

    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies College of Christian Studies 2008 John and Qumran: Discovery and Interpretation over Sixty Years Paul N. Anderson George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ccs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Paul N., "John and Qumran: Discovery and Interpretation over Sixty Years" (2008). Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies. 77. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ccs/77 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Christian Studies at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John and Qumran: discovery and Interpretation over Sixty years Paul N. Anderson It would be no exaggeration to say that the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls was the most signiicant archaeological ind of the twentieth century. As the Jesus movement must be understood in the light of contemporary Judaism, numer- ous comparisons and contrasts with the Qumran community and its writings illumine our understandings of early Christianity and its writings. As our knowl- edge of Qumran and the Dead Sea Scrolls has grown, so have its implications for Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity. Likewise, as understandings of Johannine Christianity and its writings have grown, the Qumran-Johannine analyses have also evolved. he goal of this essay is to survey the scholarly lit- erature featuring comparative investigations of Qumran and the Fourth Gospel, showing developments across six decades and suggesting new venues of inquiry for the future.