Changes in the Spawning Distribution and Biomass of Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber Scombrus) in the Western Atlantic Ocean Over 4 De

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changes in the Spawning Distribution and Biomass of Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber Scombrus) in the Western Atlantic Ocean Over 4 De 120 National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin First U.S. Commissioner established in 1881 of Fisheries and founder NOAA of Fishery Bulletin Abstract—The Atlantic mackerel Changes in the spawning distribution and biomass (Scomber scombrus) has a wide distri- bution off North America that changes of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in the substantially seasonally and interan- nually, challenging attempts to track western Atlantic Ocean over 4 decades changes in stock size. We used egg col- lections to develop an index of spawning David E. Richardson (contact author)1 stock biomass for the southern contin- Lauren Carter2 gent of Atlantic mackerel that spawns 3 in U.S. waters. These results were com- Kiersten L. Curti 2 bined with those from an egg survey of Katrin E. Marancik the northern contingent that spawns Martin Castonguay4 in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, to develop the only available stock- Email address for contact author: [email protected] wide index. Egg production of Atlantic mackerel in the western North Atlan- 1 3 tic Ocean has dropped >90% from the Northeast Fisheries Science Center Northeast Fisheries Science Center 1980s to the 2010s. The contribution of National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA the southern contingent has generally 28 Tarzwell Drive 166 Water Street been around 5–10%, except for during Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 the late 1970s and early 1980s when it 2 Integrated Statistics 4 Maurice Lamontagne Institute was 30–40%. On the continental shelf of 28 Tarzwell Drive Fisheries and Oceans Canada the northeastern United States, there Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 850 de la Mer Road has been a northeastward shift in the Mont-Joli, Quebec G5H 3Z4, Canada distribution of eggs of Atlantic mack- erel, with low levels of egg production recently at the historically important spawning location off southern New England. Overall, the index of spawn- ing stock biomass generated from sur- veys in the waters of the United States The Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scom- Atlantic Ocean is the cause of these and Canada provides a much needed brus) is a migratory, small pelagic changes (Hughes et al., 2014; Berge means of tracking fluctuations in the species that supports important fish- et al., 2015; Jansen et al., 2016). More biomass of this commercially valuable eries throughout the North Atlantic recently, the assessment has indicated migratory species. Ocean. In recent decades, the major- a decline in biomass of Atlantic mack- ity of worldwide landings of Atlantic erel in the eastern Atlantic Ocean and mackerel has occurred in the eastern the need for quota reductions, present- Atlantic Ocean, where the challenges ing new assessment and management of assessing and managing this eco- challenges. logically important species are well Atlantic mackerel in the west- documented. Specifically, for Atlantic ern North Atlantic Ocean have also mackerel in the eastern Atlantic Ocean, shifted distribution, although the a substantial increase in abundance extent and causes of this shift are less and a shift and expansion in distribu- certain than for Atlantic mackerel in tion started around 2005. This distribu- the eastern Atlantic Ocean, as are tion change led to increased difficulty the effects on resource surveys, stock in surveying the population (Nøttestad assessments, and the availability of et al., 2016), the development of new Atlantic mackerel to regional fisher- Manuscript submitted 12 September 2019. regional fisheries (Astthorsson et al., ies. Atlantic mackerel in the western Manuscript accepted 23 April 2020. 2012), conflicts among nations in quota Atlantic Ocean are considered a sin- Fish. Bull. 118:120–134 (2020). Online publication date: 4 May 2020. allocations (Spijkers and Boonstra, gle population (Sette, 1950), with a doi: 10.7755/FB.118.2.2 2017), and potentially regional changes southern contingent that spawns in in the abundance of mackerel preda- U.S. waters offshore of southern New The views and opinions expressed or tors and prey (MacKenzie et al., 2014; England and in the western Gulf of implied in this article are those of the Óskarsson et al., 2016). The results Maine (Berrien, 1978) and a north- author (or authors) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National of a number of analyses indicate that ern contingent that spawns in waters Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. the warming of waters in the North of Canada, primarily in the southern Richardson et al.: Changes in the spawning distribution and biomass of Scomber scombrus in the western Atlantic Ocean 121 National Marine Gulf of St. Lawrence (Sette, 1943; Grégoire1). Results catches despite low landings in both the United States Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin First U.S. Commissioner from tagging and cohort tracking work, primarily done and Canada, truncated age- structure in the U.S. bottom- established in 1881 of Fisheries and founder NOAA of Fishery Bulletin in the 1930s (Sette, 1950), indicate that these 2 contin- trawl survey, and results of a stock assessment in 2016 in gents mix on the continental shelf of the northeastern Canada indicating that the biomass of the northern con- United States from the late fall through the spring but tingent had reached a historic minimum in 2012 (DFO, then separate during the late- spring spawning season 2017). A joint U.S.-Canada stock assessment conducted in and through much of the summer. 2010 was consistent with this view of the stock (Deroba As with Atlantic mackerel in the eastern Atlantic et al., 2010), but that assessment was not incorporated Ocean, relative catches in different regional fisheries in into management decisions by either nation because of the western Atlantic Ocean have changed over time, in severe retrospective patterns in the assessment model part because of distribution shifts within the population. and unresolved conflicts in the data, in particular between Additionally, across the entire western North Atlantic fishery catches and the index of abundance from the U.S. Ocean, there have been substantial multi- decadal cycles bottom- trawl survey. in landings, with a notable recent 88% decline between One of the long- running challenges in assessing the 2006 and 2015 to the lowest levels since the early 1800s stock of Atlantic mackerel in the western Atlantic Ocean (Hoy and Clark2; NEFSC, 2018). During this decline, only is that the fishery- independent indices that are gener- small portions of the quotas of both Canada and the United ally used for this stock, an egg survey in Canada (1982– States were usually harvested despite industry capacity present) and a bottom- trawl survey in the United States and market demand, leading to questions about why the (1968–present), do not cover the entire range of this stock. industry was underperforming relative to expectations. Therefore, the trends in each index may be affected by Two alternative hypotheses have been proposed to changes in both abundance and availability associated explain the decline in catch of Atlantic mackerel in the with distribution shifts. western Atlantic Ocean over the past 10–15 years. The The egg survey in Canada uses the daily egg produc- first hypothesis is that warming waters in the western tion method (Grégoire et al.4), a well- established approach Atlantic Ocean (Shearman and Lentz, 2010) resulted in that is used throughout the world (Bernal et al., 2012), a shift in mackerel distribution that reduced availabil- including in the multi- nation triennial survey of Atlantic ity to the fishery (Overholtz et al., 2011). This hypothesis mackerel in the eastern Atlantic Ocean (Dransfeld et al., of a change in distribution was supported by the results 2005). For the index of spawning biomass in Canada, a from a bottom- trawl survey conducted off the northeast- systematic plankton survey is used to develop daily egg ern United States, results that included a northeastward production estimates, and gonadosomadic index measure- shift in survey catch and mean abundance per tow near ments from landings are used to evaluate seasonality of the highs of the time series (Overholtz et al., 2011). Simi- spawning to scale daily egg production to annual egg pro- larly, a northeastward shift in landings of Atlantic mack- duction. Fecundity estimates are then used to calculate erel in waters of Canada from Nova Scotia and the Gulf of spawning stock biomass. St. Lawrence to Newfoundland (Grégoire et al.3) indicated Within U.S. waters, there have been sporadic efforts, that the distribution of Atlantic mackerel was changing. each with a slightly different analytical approach, to A stock assessment that estimated high biomass and develop estimates of annual egg production or spawning very low exploitation rates of Atlantic mackerel in 2006 stock size of Atlantic mackerel. These estimates include was consistent with the hypothesis that the population of 64 trillion eggs and 320 million individuals in 1932 Atlantic mackerel was robust but availability to the fish- (Sette, 1943), 18 million individuals in 1966 (Berrien ing industry had declined (NEFSC, 2006). and Anderson5), 303 trillion eggs and 1220 million indi- The alternate hypothesis is that a population decline, viduals in 1977 (Berrien et al., 1984), and 56 trillion rather than a distribution shift, was responsible for the eggs and 240 million individuals in 1987 (Berrien6). The landings decline. This alternate hypothesis was supported 1987 survey was the only analysis to compare egg pro- by the decline in the index of egg abundance for Atlantic duction in the United States and Canada in the same mackerel in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (northern contin- year, with only 10% of stock- wide egg production being gent) (Grégoire et al.4), truncated age-structure in fishery egg surveys conducted in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence 1 Grégoire, F. (ed.). 2000. The Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scom- from 2008 to 2011. Can.
Recommended publications
  • Ecography ECOG-01937 Hattab, T., Leprieur, F., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Gravel, D., Le Loc’H, F
    Ecography ECOG-01937 Hattab, T., Leprieur, F., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Gravel, D., Le Loc’h, F. and Albouy, C. 2016. Forecasting fine- scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.01937 Supplementary material Forecasting fine-scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change by Hattab et al. Appendix 1 List of coastal exploited marine species considered in this study Species Genus Order Family Class Trophic guild Auxis rochei rochei (Risso, 1810) Auxis Perciformes Scombridae Actinopterygii Top predators Balistes capriscus Gmelin, 1789 Balistes Tetraodontiformes Balistidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758) Boops Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Basal species Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827) Carcharhinus Carcharhiniformes Carcharhinidae Elasmobranchii Top predators Dasyatis pastinaca (Linnaeus, 1758) Dasyatis Rajiformes Dasyatidae Elasmobranchii Top predators Dentex dentex (Linnaeus, 1758) Dentex Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Dentex maroccanus Valenciennes, 1830 Dentex Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Diplodus annularis (Linnaeus, 1758) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Forage species Diplodus sargus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous (Geoffroy Saint- Diplodus vulgaris Hilaire, 1817) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Basal species Engraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) Engraulis
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries of the Northeast
    FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEAST AMERICAN BLUE LOBSTER BILLFISHES ATLANTIC COD MUSSEL (Blue marlin, Sailfish, BLACK SEA BASS Swordfish, White marlin) CLAMS DRUMS BUTTERFISH (Arc blood clam, Arctic surf clam, COBIA Atlantic razor clam, Atlantic surf clam, (Atlantic croaker, Black drum, BLUEFISH (Gulf butterfish, Northern Northern kingfish, Red drum, Northern quahog, Ocean quahog, harvestfish) CRABS Silver sea trout, Southern kingfish, Soft-shelled clam, Stout razor clam) (Atlantic rock crab, Blue crab, Spot, Spotted seatrout, Weakfish) Deep-sea red crab, Green crab, Horseshoe crab, Jonah crab, Lady crab, Northern stone crab) GREEN SEA FLATFISH URCHIN EELS (Atlantic halibut, American plaice, GRAY TRIGGERFISH HADDOCK (American eel, Fourspot flounder, Greenland halibut, Conger eel) Hogchoker, Southern flounder, Summer GROUPERS flounder, Winter flounder, Witch flounder, (Black grouper, Yellowtail flounder) Snowy grouper) MACKERELS (Atlantic chub mackerel, MONKFISH HAKES JACKS Atlantic mackerel, Bullet mackerel, King mackerel, (Offshore hake, Red hake, (Almaco jack, Amberjack, Bar Silver hake, Spotted hake, HERRINGS jack, Blue runner, Crevalle jack, Spanish mackerel) White hake) (Alewife, Atlantic menhaden, Atlantic Florida pompano) MAHI MAHI herring, Atlantic thread herring, Blueback herring, Gizzard shad, Hickory shad, Round herring) MULLETS PORGIES SCALLOPS (Striped mullet, White mullet) POLLOCK (Jolthead porgy, Red porgy, (Atlantic sea Scup, Sheepshead porgy) REDFISH scallop, Bay (Acadian redfish, scallop) Blackbelly rosefish) OPAH SEAWEEDS (Bladder
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
    [Show full text]
  • Ices Cooperative Research Report (Crr) on Fish Ageing
    ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT (CRR) ON FISH AGEING CHAPTER 5: Small and Medium Pelagic Species Chapter editors: Begoña Villamor and Pierluigi Carbonara Collaborators (alphabetical order): Pablo Abaunza, Naroa Aldanondo, Loes Bolle, Gertrud Delfs, Tomas Gröhsler, Carmen Hernandez, M. Rosario Navarro, Eduardo Soares, Fernando Ramos, Isabel Riveiro, Norbert Rohlf, Jorge Tornero, Jens Ulleweit, Andres Uriarte, Lotte Worsøe Clausen. Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Summary of age estimation methodologies........................................................................... 3 2.1. Summary of general age estimation methods and problems ........................................... 9 2.1.1 Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) .............................................................................. 9 2.1.2 Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) ................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Herring (Clupea harengus) ...................................................................................... 14 2.1.4 Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) ......................................................................................... 15 2.1.5 Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) ................................................................................ 15 2.1.6 Chub mackerel (Scomber Colias) ............................................................................. 17 Figure 2.1.6.4 - Otholith
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Patterns in Distribution and Feeding of Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber Scombrus L.) Larvae in the Celtic Sea with Special Regard to Intra-Cohort Cannibalism
    Helgol Mar Res (2001) 55:135–149 DOI 10.1007/s101520000068 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Nicola Hillgruber · Matthias Kloppmann Small-scale patterns in distribution and feeding of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.) larvae in the Celtic Sea with special regard to intra-cohort cannibalism Received: 9 August 2000 / Received in revised form: 31 October 2000 / Accepted: 12 November 2000 / Published online: 10 March 2001 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 2001 Abstract Short-term variability in vertical distribution cannibalism, reaching >50% body dry weight in larva and feeding of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.) ≥8.0 mm SL. larvae was investigated while tracking a larval patch over a 48-h period. The patch was repeatedly sampled Keywords Mackerel larvae · Vertical distribution · Diet · and a total of 12,462 mackerel larvae were caught within Diel patterns · Cannibalism the upper 100 m of the water column. Physical parame- ters were monitored at the same time. Larval length dis- tribution showed a mode in the 3.0 mm standard length Introduction (SL) class (mean abundance of 3.0 mm larvae x¯ =75.34 per 100 m3, s=34.37). Highest densities occurred at In the eastern Atlantic, the highest densities of Atlantic 20–40 m depth. Larvae <5.0 mm SL were highly aggre- mackerel (Scomber scombrus) larvae appear in the Celtic gated above the thermocline, while larvae ≥5.0 mm SL Sea and above the Celtic Shelf in May/June (O’Brien were more dispersed and tended to migrate below the and Fives 1995), where the larvae hatch at the onset of thermocline. Gut contents of 1,177 mackerel larvae the secondary productivity maximum (Colebrook 1986) (2.9–9.7 mm SL) were analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • SPAWNING BEHAVIOUR and FECUNDITY of the INDIAN MACKEREL, RASTRELLIGER KANAGURTA (CUVIER), at MANGALORE Central Marine Fisheries
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CMFRI Digital Repository SPAWNING BEHAVIOUR AND FECUNDITY OF THE INDIAN MACKEREL, RASTRELLIGER KANAGURTA (CUVIER), AT MANGALORE V. RAMAMOHANA RAO Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute; Sub-station, Visakhapatnam-3 The earliest reference to the fecundity of the Indian mackerel was by Devanesan and John (1940) who estimated the number of ripe eggs in the mackerel ovary as 94,000. Subsequent work was directed mostly towards finding out the spawning behaviour of this fish, by the study of the intra-ovarian eggs. Pradhan (1956) indicated the possibility of the Indian mackerel spawning the eggs in successive batches over a prolonged period, like its Atlantic counter-part Scomber scombrus (L). Pra­ dhan and Palekar (1956) described the maturity stages I to VII, based on the external appearance of the ovary, its size relative to the abdominal cavity, and the range of ova-diameter readings. However, they have not given any ova-diameter frequency polygons. Sekharan (1958) studied the ova-diameter frequency in a few ovaries of the mackerel, ranging in maturity stage from II-III to V-VI, VI-VII and a few spent ovaries. He stated that his investigation showed a possibility of the mackerel eggs ripening in batches and of their release in succession. Radhakrishnan (1962), adopting the method followed by Clark (1934), Prabhu (1956), and Qasim and Qayyam (1961), studied the ova-diameter frequency seasonally and indicated the possibility of the mackerel shedding its eggs in batches. Vijayaraghavan (1962) followed a different procedure. Employing very high magnification, he measured ova with diameter greater than 0.525 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations on the Biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger Kanagurta
    Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics Thesis submitted to Cochin University of Science and Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY FACULTY OF MARINE SCIENCES GANGA .U. Reg. No. 2763 DEPARTMENT OF MARINE BIOLOGY, MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY SCHOOL OF MARINE SCIENCES COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY KOCHI – 682 016, INDIA September 2010 DECLARATION I, Ganga. U., do hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics “ is a genuine record of research work carried out by me under the guidance of Prof. (Dr.) C.K. Radhakrishnan, Emeritus Professor, Cochin University of Science and Technology, and no part of the work has previously formed the basis for the award of any Degree, Associateship and Fellowship or any other similar title or recognition of any University or Institution. Ganga.U Kochi – 16 September-2010 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics” to be submitted by Smt. Ganga. U., is an authentic record of research work carried out by her under my guidance and supervision in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Cochin University of Science and Technology, under the faculty of Marine Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Mackerel Scomber Scombrus on Zooplankton*
    MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES I Vol. l?: 65-75, 1984 Published April 26 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. I Diets and selective feeding by larvae of Atlantic mackerel Scomber scombrus on zooplankton* William T. Peterson and Seth J. Ausubel Marine Sciences Research Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Stony Brook, New York 11794,USA ABSTRACT: This paper describes the diets of 201 larvae of Atlantic mackerel Scomber scombrus L. collected from Long Island Sound, New York (USA) during May-June 1982 and 1983. First-feeding larvae (3.5 mm in length) were phytophagous. The diets of larvae 4.5 mm were composed of the nauplii of Acartia hudsonica, Temora longicornis and Pseudocalanus sp. Larvae > 5 mm ate some copepodites of A. hudsonica and T. longicornis and smaller proportions of phytoplankton and copepod nauplii. Mackerel 3 6.5 mm were cannibalistic, eating larvae 3.5 to 4.5 mm in length. Weight of stomach contents averaged 1.8 % of an individual's body weight. We calculated that, in order to satisfy its daily energy requirement, a mackerel larva must consume 25 to 75 % of its body weight per day. Larvae fed selectively, taking a greater proportion of T. longicornis and Pseudocalanus sp. nauplii and a lesser proportion of A. hudsonica nauplii than expected by chance alone. Ivlev index values for T. longicomis nauplii were +0.66,for Pseudocalanussp., +0.25, and for A. hudsonica, -0.55. The Chesson index and Pearre's 'C' yielded the same result. We hypothesize that mackerel larvae select food primarily on the basis of prey visibility (both Pseudocalanus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Subfamily Scomberomorin^ (Family Scombrid^) from Indian Waters
    ON FISHES OF THE SUBFAMILY SCOMBEROMORIN^ (FAMILY SCOMBRID^) FROM INDIAN WATERS BY S. JONES AND E. G. SILAS (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute) INTRODUCTION WHILE hardly a dozen species of Spanish mackerels or seerfishes are recog­ nisable at present from the warmer waters of the Indo-Pacific and the Atlantic^ only recently has the nomenclature used to denote these, attained any degree of stability. Though some workers may be still inclined to treat Scombero- morus Lacepede, and Acanthocybium Gill, under two separate families or sub­ families, for reasons given elsewhere (Jones and Silas, 1960, 376), it is felt that for all practical purposes it will be desirable to treat these as two distinct genera under the subfamily Scomberomorinae of the family Scombridae. In the course of the present study we have encountered only three species of Spanish mackerels from the Indian coast. Although this number may be considered to be too few, we have often found field-workers unable to correctly identify them when confronted with them in the fresh state in the fish-landing centres. Since the Spanish mackerels constitute an important coastal pelagic fishery along most parts of the Indian coast, and as often two or all three species are landed with the same type of gear or different types of gear at the same place, it is imperative that stress be also laid on accuracy in species determination. It is hoped that this brief review will help fishery workers in their study on this group of fishes.* The methodology used for body proportions, and collection of other data, does not deviate from that given for 'Indian Tunas' (Jones and Silas^ 1960, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Identification Guide Depicts More Than 50 Species of Fish Commonly Encoun- Make the Proper Identification of Every Fish Caught
    he identification of different spe- Most species of fish are distinctive in appear- ance and relatively easy to identify. However, cies of fish has become an im- closely related species, such as members of the portant concern for recreational same “family” of fish, can present problems. For these species it is important to look for certain fishermen. The proliferation of T distinctive characteristics to make a positive regulations relating to minimum identification. sizes and possession limits compels fishermen to The ensuing fish identification guide depicts more than 50 species of fish commonly encoun- make the proper identification of every fish caught. tered in Virginia waters. In addition to color illustrations of each species, the description of each species lists the distinctive characteristics which enable a positive identification. Total Length FIRST DORSAL FIN Fork Length SECOND NUCHAL DORSAL FIN BAND SQUARE TAIL NARES FORKED TAIL GILL COVER (Operculum) CAUDAL LATRAL PEDUNCLE CHIN BARBELS LINE PECTORAL CAUDAL FIN ANAL FINS FIN PELVIC FINS GILL RAKERS GILL ARCH UNDERSIDE OF GILL COVER GILL RAKER GILL FILAMENTS GILL FILAMENTS DEFINITIONS Anal Fin – The fin on the bottom of fish located between GILL ARCHES 1st the anal vent (hole) and the tail. 2nd 3rd Barbels – Slender strands extending from the chins of 4th some fish (often appearing similar to whiskers) which per- form a sensory function. Caudal Fin – The tail fin of fish. Nuchal Band – A dark band extending from behind or Caudal Peduncle – The narrow portion of a fish’s body near the eye of a fish across the back of the neck toward immediately in front of the tail.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Biological characteristics of tuna Tuna and tuna-like species are very important economically and a significant Related topics source of food, with the so-called principal market tuna species - skipjack, yellowfin, bigeye, albacore, Atlantic bluefin, Pacific bluefin (those two species Tuna resources previously considered belonging to the same species referred as northern bluefin) Tuna fisheries and and southern bluefin tuna - being the most significant in terms of catch weight and utilization trade. These pages are a collection of Fact Sheets providing detailed information on tuna and tuna-like species. Related information FAO FishFinder Aquatic Species - fact Table of Contents sheets Taxonomy and classification Related activities Morphological characteristics FAO activities on tuna Geographical distribution Habitat and biology Trophic relations and growth Reproduction Bibliography Taxonomy and classification [ Family: Scombridae ] : Scombrids [ Family: Istiophoridae Family: Xiphiidae ] : Billfishes Upper systematics of tunas and tuna-like species Scombrids and billfishes belong to the suborder of the Scombroidei which position is shown below: Phylum : Chordata └─ Subphylum Vertebrata └─ Superclass Gnathostomata └─ Class Osteichthyes └─ Subclass Actinopterygii └─ Infraclass Teleostei └─ Superorder Acanthopterygii └─ Order Perciformes ├─ Suborder Scombroidei | └─ Family Scombridae └─ Suborder Xiphioidei FAO Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • Maturity and Spawning of Atlantic Chub Mackerel Scomber Colias in M'diq Bay, Morocco
    E3S Web of Conferences 183, 01005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018301005 I2CNP 2020 Maturity and spawning of Atlantic chub mackerel Scomber colias in M’diq Bay, Morocco Mohamed Techetach1*, Hafid Achtak1, Fatima Rafiq1, Abdallah Dahbi1, Rabia Ajana2, and Younes Saoud2 1Environment and Health Team, Department of Biology, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Safi, Cadi Ayyad University, Sidi Bouzid District, P.O. Box 4162, 46000, Safi, Morocco 2Applied Biology and Pathology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, 93002, Tetouan, Morocco Abstract. Knowledge of reproductive parameters is necessary to understand the ecology, the population dynamics and to enable rational management of fish of economic interest. This work is a contribution to the study of some aspects of the reproductive biology of the Atlantic mackerel Scomber colias (Gmelin, 1789) in the Mediterranean Moroccan coast. The study is based on samples taken from commercial catches in M'diq Bay. The spawning period was determined following both the monthly changes of the gonadosomatic index and the histological maturity stages. The Atlantic chub mackerel spawn between November and March, with maximum activity in December. 1 Introduction The Atlantic chub mackerel Scomber colias (Gmelin, 1789) is a costal pelagic species. It is frequent over the continental slope from the surface to 300 m depth. The S. Colias is a gregarious and migratory species. It is widely distributed in the warm waters of the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea. In the eastern Atlantic, chub mackerel occurs between the Bay of Biscay and South Africa [1]. Recently, genetic divergence and phenotypic variation has been demonstrated that Scomber japonicus and Scomber colias were distinct.
    [Show full text]