DOCSLIB.ORG

CHENETTE, Louis Fred, 1931- Î,ÎUSIC THEORY in the BRITISH ISLES DURING the ENLIGHTENMENT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHENETTE, Louis Fred, 1931- Î,ÎUSIC THEORY in the BRITISH ISLES DURING the ENLIGHTENMENT This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 68-2965 CHENETTE, Louis Fred, 1931- Î,ÎUSIC THEORY IN THE BRITISH ISLES DURING THE ENLIGHTENMENT. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1967 Music University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © Copyright by Louis Fred Chenette 1968 4 MUSIC THEORY IN THE BRITISH ISLES • DURING THE ENLIGHTENMENT DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Louis Fred Chenette, B.A., M.Mus. ****** The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by A dviser School LSic ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank Professor Norman Phelps for his inspiration and guidance in the writing of this dissertation; Professor William Poland, who stimulated important insights in both musical and technical areas ; and Professor Lee Rigsby, who also provided many valuable suggestions. Thanks are due Miss Olga Buth of The Ohio State University Music Library who assisted in obtaining copies of the source materials, and the librarians of the British Museum who permitted access to their extensive collections. The author's wife, Emmy Lou, not only was a source of encouragement, but also assisted in editing and pre­ paration of the typescript. ii VITA A p ril 2, 1931 Born - Powersville, Iowa 1 9 5 3 .................. B.A., IVheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois 1956 .................. M.Mus., Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 1953-1958 . Instructor, Antioch Township High School Antioch, Illinois 1958-1959 • • Instructor, Bemidji State College Bemidji, Minnesota i 960 - .... Associate Professor, Findlay College Findlay, Ohio 1966 - .... Chairman, Division of Fine Arts, Findlay College Findlay, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Music Theory iii t a b l e of c o n te n ts Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................. i i i LIST OF PLATES................................................................................................ v i i LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................ ix INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 The Organization of the Study ............................................................ 1 Primary R eferences ................................................................................ 6 Related Studies ..................................................................... '.................. 11 Political and Intellectual Developnents . .................... 19 C hapter I . REASON AND S E N S E .......................................................................... 33 The Return of Rationalism ................................................. 36 Toward Em piricism .................................................................. Summary o f th e Statem ents on Reason and Sense . 69 I I . THEORIES OF SOUND.......................................................................... ?1 Background Inform ation ..................................................... 72 The Generation of MusicaJ. Sound .................................... 73 Theories of Sound Generation ............................... 73 G enerators o f M usical Sound .................................... J8 The Transmission of Musical Sound .............................................9 ^ theories of Transm ission ........................................ 9^ Prohlems Relating to the Transmission of Sound 96 The Theorists on the Transmission of Sound . 98 The Reception of Musical Sound .................................... 113 I I I . SCALE ....................................................................................... 117 Approaches to S cale .............................................................. 117 Charles Butler on Scale and Mode ............................... 119 Renatus Descartes and William Lord Brouncker . 123 John Birchensha .............................' ...................................... 132 Christopher Simpson .............................................................. 140 John Playford ........................................................................... 142 Thomas S a lm o n ........................................................................... 143 William H older ....................................................................... 147 iv III. SCALE, cont. Page Arthur Bedford .......................' .............................................. l4 9 Alexander Malcolm .................................................................. 150 William T urner .................................. 153 Ambrose W arren ....................................................................... 153 Roger North euid Prencourt .................. 154 John F o n d .................................................................................... l6 0 John Christopher Pepusch ...................... ....... l 6o Robert Smith ........................................................................... l6 4 Scale Developments in the Enli^tenm ent .................. 169 IV. CONSONANCE AND DISSONANCE......................................................... 1?4 The Theorists on Consonance and Dissonance . 175 Elway B evin ................................................................................ 1?6 Charles Butler ....................................................................... ITT Renatus D escartes ................................................ 178 Birchensha's Translation of Alsted's "Musica" . 182 Christopher Simpson .............................................................. l8 4 Francis North ........................................................................... l8 4 John Blov .............................................................. ..... 188 Godfrey K e lle r ......................................................... 188 ~ - William Holder .............................. I 88 Alexander Malcolm .................................................................. I 90 Roger North and Prencourt .................................... 193 William Turner ..................................................... 209 John F o n d .................................................................................... 211 John Christopher Pepusch ................................................. 212 John Frederick Lam pe .......................... 2 l4 Robert Sm ith ........................................................................... 215 Giorgio Antoniotto .............................................................. 219 Summary ......................................................................................... 220 V. HARMONIC VOCABULARY....................................................................... 225 Matthev Locke ........................................................................... 226 John B lo w .................................................................................... 230 Godfrey K e lle r .............................‘........................................ 236 Francis N orth ........................................................................... 243 Arthur B edford ....................................................................... 2^6 Roger North ................................................ 25^ Alexander îfelcolm .................................................................. 277 John F o n d .................................................................................... 289 John Christopher Pepusch ................................................. 292 John Frederick Lam pe .......................................................... 309 Giorgio Antoniotto .............................................................. 320 John Holden . ' ..................................... 3 ^ Harmonic Structures in the Treatises ...................... 3^6 Page VI. ENGLISH THEORETICAL WRITINGS DURING THE ENLIGHTENMENT 371 Summary o f th e S t u d y ..................................... 371 Reason and Sense .................................................................. 372 Musical Sound ................................................ ......................... 376 Developments in Scale .......................................................... 3^0 Theories of Consonance and Dissonance ...... 386 Developments in Harmonic Theory ............... 391 PRIMARY REFERENCES, AN ANNOTATED L IS T IN G ................... 399 SECONDARY REFERENCES............................................................... 4 l4 VI LIST OF PLATES Plate . ‘ Page I Mace's explanation of the octave .................................................. $0 II Compai'ison of the vibrations of the trumpet and trumpet-marine ............................................................................... 88 III North's example of secondary radiation ................... 107 IV Brouncker's system for division of a string by mean proportionals .............................................................. I 30 V Comparison of tuning system s .................................................. I 33 • VI Comparison of tuning systems, continued ................................ 13^ VII Computations for Birchensha's scale .... ........................ 136 VIII Computations for Birchensha's scale, continued ................... 137 IX Rationale for Birchensha's scale .................................................. 138 X Relative string lengths in Birchensha's
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Greek Art 1St Edition
    GREEK ART 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nigel Spivey | 9780714833682 | | | | | Greek Art 1st edition PDF Book No Date pp. Fresco of an ancient Macedonian soldier thorakitai wearing chainmail armor and bearing a thureos shield, 3rd century BC. This work is a splendid survey of all the significant artistic monuments of the Greek world that have come down to us. They sometimes had a second story, but very rarely basements. Inscription to ffep, else clean and bright, inside and out. The Erechtheum , next to the Parthenon, however, is Ionic. Well into the 19th century, the classical tradition derived from Greece dominated the art of the western world. The Moschophoros or calf-bearer, c. Red-figure vases slowly replaced the black-figure style. Some of the best surviving Hellenistic buildings, such as the Library of Celsus , can be seen in Turkey , at cities such as Ephesus and Pergamum. The Distaff Side: Representing…. Chryselephantine Statuary in the Ancient Mediterranean World. The Greeks were quick to challenge Publishers, New York He and other potters around his time began to introduce very stylised silhouette figures of humans and animals, especially horses. Add to Basket Used Hardcover Condition: g to vg. The paint was frequently limited to parts depicting clothing, hair, and so on, with the skin left in the natural color of the stone or bronze, but it could also cover sculptures in their totality; female skin in marble tended to be uncoloured, while male skin might be a light brown. After about BC, figures, such as these, both male and female, wore the so-called archaic smile.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History
    ANCIENT HISTORY ‘The real political leadership of Sparta rested with the elders and the ephors’ (C. G. Thomas). To what extent is this an accurate description of the government of Sparta? According to both ancient and modern sources on Sparta, its’ political leadership could be perceived to be in the control of the elders, the dual kingship and the Ephors alone. However, for one to completely agree with C. G. Thomas and confirm the accuracy of his statement, the political significance of the Apella and the democratic system in ancient Sparta would have to be ignored. It is the nature of the ‘balance of power’ between these four groups, and the extent of power that is given to each, that ultimately decides the validity and truthfulness of the statement made by C.G. Thomas. One aspect of the Spartan political sphere which holds some significance is the Apella; the assembly attended by those over the age of thirty who held full citizenship. They: elected the Ephors, elders of the Gerousia and other magistrates, were responsible for passing measures put before it, such as appointments of military commanders, decisions about peace and war, resolutions for problems regarding kingship, and the emancipation of helots. However, the assembly did not debate; instead, they listened to the Kings, Ephors, and councillors. It also did not decide on the issues that would be voted on, for this was a power of the Gerousia. It would seem that however important and democratic the Apella were, they did not truly hold power. Modern historian Cartledge explains that, ‘It is hardly likely that an assembly whose members have been trained from earliest childhood to respect and unquestioningly obey their elders would easily reject a proposal of the Gerousia.’ Consequently, it would seem that the Apella is almost an unnecessary body, intended to give the feeling of order and equality amongst the Spartiates without giving any true power.
    [Show full text]
  • VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA ‘In Sparta Are to Be Found Those Who Are Most Enslaved and Those Who Are the Most Free.’
    CHAPTER 2 VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA ‘In Sparta are to be found those who are most enslaved and those who are the most free.’ CRITIAS OF ATHENS sample pages Spartan infantry in a formation called a phalanx. 38 39 CHAPTER 2 VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA KEY POINTS KEY CONCEPTS OVERVIEW • At the end of the Dark Age, the Spartan polis emerged DEMOCRACY OLIGARCHY TYRANNY MONARCHY from the union of a few small villages in the Eurotas valley. Power vested in the hands Power vested in the hands A system under the control A system under the control • Owing to a shortage of land for its citizens, Sparta waged of all citizens of the polis of a few individuals of a non-hereditary ruler of a king war on its neighbour Messenia to expand its territory. unrestricted by any laws • The suppression of the Messenians led to a volatile slave or constitution population that threatened Sparta’s way of life, making the DEFINITION need for reform urgent. KEY EVENTS • A new constitution was put in place to ensure Sparta could protect itself from this new threat, as well as from tyranny. Citizens of the polis all A small, powerful and One individual exercises Hereditary rule passing 800 BCE • Sweeping reforms were made that transformed Sparta share equal rights in the wealthy aristocratic class complete authority over from father to son political sphere all aspects of everyday life Sparta emerges from the into a powerful military state that soon came to dominate Most citizens barred from Family dynasties claim without constraint Greek Dark Age the Peloponnese.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Rhetra
    Fragkaki, M. (2015); The Great Rhetra Rosetta 17: 35 – 51 http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/issue17/fragkaki.pdf The Great Rhetra Mary Fragkaki University of Athens The Great Rhētra1 of Sparta is one of first legislative and constitutional documents of the archaic period.2 It looks like a kind of constitutional charter of the Spartan state, sanctioning the establishment of state cults, the divisions of the citizens, the main governmental bodies, and envisaging the principles of political decision-making. 3 The exact meaning and significance of these constitutional provisions, the dating of the document4 and the historical context at the time of its introduction create controversy among modern scholars. The main sources for the Spartan rhētra are Plutarch 5 (Life of Lycurgus 6.1-10) and Diodorus Siculus (VII.12.6 = Tyrtaeus 3a). Aristotle also quotes six lines of Tyrtaeus, probably deriving from the poem called Eunomia by later authors, which referred to an oracle brought from Delphi by unspecified persons.6 Tyrtaeus’ Eunomia was a hortatory poem, which certainly mentioned the return of Heracleidae, the event that gave the kings of Sparta their rights on Lakonia. Aristotle had the same elegy in mind when he referred to the request of a redistribution of land, gēs anadasmos, which occurred at the time of the Messenian War (Politics 1306b22ff. = Tyrtaeus T7G.-P. = fr. 1 W.).7 Sparta is the most celebrated example of an archaic and classical Greek polis that largely lacked written legislation.8 There is a strong possibility that even the Lycurgan rhētra was not written down before the late archaic or even the classical period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commoner in Spartan History from the Lycurgan Reforms to the Death of Alexander: 776-322 B
    THE COMMONER IN SPARTAN HISTORY FROM THE LYCURGAN REFORMS TO THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER: 776-323 B. C. By SHASTA HUTTON ABUALTIN fl Bachelor of Arts in Arts and Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1986 THE COMMONER I N SPARTAN HI STORY FROM THE LYCURGAN REFORMS TO THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER : 776- 323 B. C. Thesis Approv e d : Dean of t h e Graduate Colleg e 125"1196 ii PREFACE The ancient Greeks, their accomplishments, and their history have always facinated me. Further studies into Greek history developed an interest in the Spartans and their activities. So many of the ancient authors are if not openly, at least covertly, hostile to the Spartans. Many of the modern works are concerned only with the early or late history or are general surveys of the total history of Sparta while few works consider Sparta separate from the other Greek city-states in the classical period. My intention is to examine the role of the commoner in ancient Sparta. It must be emphasized that the use of "commoner" in this text refers to the Spartan citizens who were not kings. The Spartan slaves and other non-citizen groups are not included in the classification of commoners. This examination considers the lifestyle of the commoner, his various roles in the government, the better-known commoners, and the various conflicts which arose between the kings and the commoners.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Handbook of Greek Mythology
    — Early Castles of Stone — 1111 2 3 4 5 THE ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK 6 OF GREEK MYTHOLOGY 7 8 ᇹᇺᇹ 9 11110 11 12 13 14 11115 16 17 18 19 11120 21 22 23 24 25111 26 27 28 29 11130 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 11140 41 42 43 44 45 11146 1111 2 3 4 5 THE ROUTLEDGE 6 7 HANDBOOK OF GREEK 8 9 11110 MYTHOLOGY 11 ᇹᇺᇹ 12 13 14 11115 Based on 16 17 H.J. Rose’s Handbook of 18 Greek Mythology 19 11120 21 22 23 24 25111 Robin Hard 26 27 28 29 11130 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 11140 41 42 43 44 45 11146 First published 2004 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 2004 Robin Hard All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record has been requested for this title ISBN 0-203-44633-X Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-75457-3 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0–415–18636–6 (Print Edition) 1111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11110 11 12 13 14 11115 In Memory of 16 LAUNCELOT FREDERIC HARD 17 18 1916–2002 19 11120 21
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greece and Rome: an Overview
    ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME: AN OVERVIEW DR LEWIS WEBB, CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY AND ANCIENT HISTORY / ANTIKENS KULTUR OCH SAMHÄLLSLIV UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Structure Introduction Civilization? Why study Ancient Greece and Rome? Primary sources Secondary sources Ancient Greece Ancient Rome UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Civilization? What is civilization? ‘Civilization’ often equated with ‘society’. Culturally-bound concept. Always contested and argued over. Often used to hierarchise and judge societies, e.g. one civilization is judged more ‘civilized’ than another. Arrogant, paternalistic, Euro-centric view: Kenneth Clark, 1969, Civilisation: https://youtu.be/JxEJn7dWY60?t=213 ‘I think I can recognise it when I see it ’. Oxford English Dictionary s.v. civilisation (3 a-c): 1. The state or condition of being civilized; human cultural, social, and intellectual development when considered to be advanced and progressive in nature. Also in extended use. 2. The culture, society, and way of life of a particular country, region, epoch, or group. 3. A particular culture, society, and way of life as characteristic of a community of people; (also) a civilized society. UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Civilization? Even in antiquity, Greek and Roman communities contrasted their own societies with others, deeming their own to be more civilized and others ‘barbaric’, for example Greek communities and the Persians, and Romans and the Celtic and Germanic communíties. Ancient Greek: βάρβαρος (barbaros) – non-Greek, foreign. Latin: barbarus – non-Greek, non-Roman, foreign, strange; civis – citizen; civitas – citizenship, community, polity; civilis – citizen-like, civil, polite, urbane. Prof. Mary Beard (Cambridge) in Civilisations: How do we look (2018): “I am even more concerned than [Kenneth] Clark with the discontents and debates around the idea of civilisation, and with how that rather fragile concept is justified and defended.
    [Show full text]
  • Acclamation and Aggregation in Ancient Greece
    Shouts, murmurs, and votes: Acclamation and aggregation in ancient Greece Melissa Schwartzberg Columbia University ms3125@columbia.edu March 2009 1 Introduction The aggregation of votes is today considered a defining, if imperfect, mechanism of democratic decision-making. Aggregation has confronted two major challenges in recent decades: one from social-choice theorists emphasizing the instability or manipulability of vote outcomes, and the second from deliberative democrats, highlighting the normative poverty of voting without reason-giving or the capacity to transform preferences. Yet neither social-choice theorists nor deliberative democrats typically seek to eliminate the recourse to counting votes as a means of resolving disputes: their aim is to correct or to supplement the apparent deficiencies of aggregation. After all, aggregation seems to be the only game in town. The way in which collective bodies render decisions is almost always through the process of counting votes, though voting may be preceded by deliberation and the count conducted in any number of ways. Today, we tend to think of our individual political judgments on matters of importance as being discrete and as being capable of summation. Such a view underlies the use of majority or supermajority rule: almost ubiquitously, we choose a precise number of votes, or a specific percentage of the total, to constitute the appropriate threshold for the adoption of a policy or the election of a candidate. Yet the activity of counting inherent in the notion of aggregation – the idea that the outcome of democratic decisions ought to be determined by specifically calculating the number of votes – was not always taken to be the critical means by which we might discover collective preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • 422 Zu Prom. 448 F. Verdient Peeks Vorschlag, Hier Zu Lesen Statt (Anm
    422 DE NOVIS LIBRIS IUDICIA Zu Prom. 448 f. verdient Peeks Vorschlag, hier zu lesen statt (Anm. 16q, S. 257), Beachtung. Unglaubhaft ist die Auffassung, welche die Menschen vor dem Auftreten des Pro- metheus als nur getrdumt, abhangig von dem Traumer Zeus, vorstellt: man beachte Groenebooms Kommentar zur Stelle! Jedoch wollen diese Bemerkungen die verdienstliche Leistung des Verfassers nicht beeintrachtigen. Seine Arbeit verdient einen grosseren Leserkreis als man bei einer privat-gedruckten Disserta- tion leider erwarten kann. BILTHOVEN, Groenlinglaan 52 A. H. M. KESSELS A. W. GOMME, A. ANDREWES and K. J. DOVER, A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. IV: Books V 25 - VII. Oxford, Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1970. XV, 502 p. Pr. £ 5. It is greatly to be welcomed that Professors Andrewes and Dover have undertaken to complete the unfinished monumental historical commentary on Thucydides by the late A. W. Gomme. Gomme had left a draft of the commentary on the remaining part of book V, from c. 25 onward. So Andrewes, who edited this part of the work, could confine himself to revising and supplementing G.'s text, marking his own (rather numerous) additions by square brackets. Dover, who undertook the commentary on books VI and VII, had only a number of stray notes by Gomme at his disposal and had therefore to write ab initio his part of the commentary, indicating where he had drawn upon a note of Gomme. From the many illuminating notes contained in this volume, which will be helpful and stimulating, I single out, only exempli gratia, the useful topographical appendix, Andrewes' arguments supporting the view that the popular assembly in Sparta was called ekklesia and not, as is often supposed, apella (134), and p.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes of Clinical Psychologists Towards the Reporting of Nonhuman Animal Abuse Laetitia Geoffroy-Dallery Antioch University, New England
    Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2018 Attitudes of Clinical Psychologists Towards the Reporting of Nonhuman Animal Abuse Laetitia Geoffroy-Dallery Antioch University, New England Follow this and additional works at: https://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Geoffroy-Dallery, Laetitia, "Attitudes of Clinical Psychologists Towards the Reporting of Nonhuman Animal Abuse" (2018). Dissertations & Theses. 438. https://aura.antioch.edu/etds/438 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses at AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses by an authorized administrator of AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. For more information, please contact dpenrose@antioch.edu, wmcgrath@antioch.edu. Running Head: ATTITUDES TOWARD REPORTING OF NONHUMAN ANIMAL ABUSE Attitudes of Clinical Psychologists Towards the Reporting of Nonhuman Animal Abuse by Laetitia Geoffroy-Dallery A.L.B., Harvard University, 2013 M.S., Antioch University New England, 2016 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Psychology in the Department of Clinical Psychology at Antioch University New England, 2018 Keene, New Hampshire ATTITUDES TOWARD REPORTING NONHUMAN ANIMAL ABUSE ii Department of Clinical Psychology DISSERTATION COMMITTEE PAGE The undersigned have examined the dissertation entitled: ATTITUDES OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE REPORTING OF NONHUMAN ANIMAL ABUSE presented on July 16, 2018 by Laetitia Geoffroy-Dallery Candidate for the degree of Doctor of Psychology and hereby certify that it is accepted*. Dissertation Committee Chairperson: Martha B.
    [Show full text]