Worked in the Entertainment Indus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sun Devil Legends
SUN DEVIL LEGENDS over North Carolina. Local sports historians point to that game as the introduction of Arizona State Frank Kush football to the national scene. Five years later, the Sun Devils again capped an undefeated season by ASU Coach, 1958-1979 downing Nebraska, 17-14. The win gave ASU a No. In 1955, Hall of Fame coach Dan Devine hired 2 national ranking for the year, and ushered ASU Frank Kush as one of his assistants at Arizona into the elite of college football programs. State. It was his first coaching job. Just three years • The success of Arizona State University football later, Kush succeeded Devine as head coach. On under Frank Kush led to increased exposure for the December 12, 1995 he joined his mentor and friend university through national and regional television in the College Football Hall of Fame. appearances. Evidence of this can be traced to the Before he went on to become a top coach, Frank fact that Arizona State’s enrollment increased from Kush was an outstanding player. He was a guard, 10,000 in 1958 (Kush’s first season) to 37,122 playing both ways for Clarence “Biggie” Munn at in 1979 (Kush’s final season), an increase of over Michigan State. He was small for a guard; 5-9, 175, 300%. but he played big. State went 26-1 during Kush’s Recollections of Frank Kush: • One hundred twenty-eight ASU football student- college days and in 1952 he was named to the “The first three years that I was a head coach, athletes coached by Kush were drafted by teams in Look Magazine All-America team. -
Media Ownership Chart
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly . In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world's largest media corporation. In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly , shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth. Who Controls the Media? Parent General Electric Time Warner The Walt Viacom News Company Disney Co. Corporation $100.5 billion $26.8 billion $18.9 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues $23 billion 1998 revenues $13 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues Background GE/NBC's ranks No. -
Handbook of Sports and Media
Job #: 106671 Author Name: Raney Title of Book: Handbook of Sports & Media ISBN #: 9780805851892 HANDBOOK OF SPORTS AND MEDIA LEA’S COMMUNICATION SERIES Jennings Bryant/Dolf Zillmann, General Editors Selected titles in Communication Theory and Methodology subseries (Jennings Bryant, series advisor) include: Berger • Planning Strategic Interaction: Attaining Goals Through Communicative Action Dennis/Wartella • American Communication Research: The Remembered History Greene • Message Production: Advances in Communication Theory Hayes • Statistical Methods for Communication Science Heath/Bryant • Human Communication Theory and Research: Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges, Second Edition Riffe/Lacy/Fico • Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, Second Edition Salwen/Stacks • An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research HANDBOOK OF SPORTS AND MEDIA Edited by Arthur A.Raney College of Communication Florida State University Jennings Bryant College of Communication & Information Sciences The University of Alabama LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS Senior Acquisitions Editor: Linda Bathgate Assistant Editor: Karin Wittig Bates Cover Design: Tomai Maridou Photo Credit: Mike Conway © 2006 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2009. To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk. Copyright © 2006 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microform, retrieval system, or any other means, without prior written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Handbook of sports and media/edited by Arthur A.Raney, Jennings Bryant. p. cm.–(LEA’s communication series) Includes bibliographical references and index. -
By Placing Its Thumb on the Scale of Competition, the Commission by This
....@-- by placing its thumb on the scale of competition, the Commission by this Rule has distorted and restricted competition in other ways affecting pro gram producers, syndicators, independent stations, new networks, and network affiliates. The Rule has come to be seen largely as a measure to promote the fortunes of independent and UHF stations. The evidence shows that today many independent stations are more profitable than affiliates. Further, UHF affil iates of ABC, CBS and NBC are victims of the Rule, yet on average are fi nancially weaker than UHF independents, intended beneficiaries of the Rule. Furthermore, any "handicapII affecting independent UHF stations in the past has been reduced or eliminated, due to forces other than PTAR. The economic costs, penalties, restrictions and consumer harms caused by PTAR cannot be justified by an increase in diversity, because PTAR has not increased diversity. The number of outlets for local broadcast programming is unchanged by the Rule. The number of sources of programming avail able to those outlets is reduced by the terms of the Rule. There is no basis to believe that the Rule enhances the diversity of prime-time broadcast program content (or the variety of viewpoints), and there are some reasons to believe that diversity has been reduced. In any event, the flowering of new media alternatives makes irrelevant whatever marginal change in broadcast network affiliate content diversity, if any, can be attributed to the Rule. ECONOMISTS INCORPORATED - 65- Appendix A Data tables Table A-I -
Configuring Logos on the DNCS User Guide
738163 R ev B Configuring Logos on the DNCS User Guide Please Read Important Please read this entire guide. If this guide provides installation or operation instructions, give particular attention to all safety statements included in this guide. Notices Trademark Acknowledgments Cisco and the Cisco logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. A listing of Cisco's trademarks can be found at www.cisco.com/go/trademarks. Third party trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. (1009R) Publication Disclaimer Cisco Systems, Inc. assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions that may appear in this publication. We reserve the right to change this publication at any time without notice. This document is not to be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any copyright or patent, whether or not the use of any information in this document employs an invention claimed in any existing or later issued patent. Copyright © 2008, 2010, 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Information in this publication is subject to change without notice. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by photocopy, microfilm, xerography, or any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without the express permission of Cisco Systems, Inc. Contents About This Guide v Logo Overview 1 Logo Types ............................................................................................................................... -
127-144 History
Two Sun Devils greats, as 2005 Pac-10 Hall of Honor inductee Joe Caldwell, with his gold medal from the 1964 Olympics, sits next to 2005 NBA Lottery pick and 2005 Pac-10 Player of the Year Ike Diogu. YEAR-BY-YEAR 1912-2007 Overall Conference Overall Conference Year Coach W L Pct. W L Pct. Place Year Coach W L Pct. W L Pct. Place 1912 C.W. Adams 8 2 .800 7 1 .873 (H) 1960 Ned Wulk 16 7 .696 7 3 .700 T2nd (B) 1913 C.W. Adams 3 3 .500 2 2 .500 (H) 1961 Ned Wulk (NCAA) 23 6 .793 9 1 .900 T1st (B) 1914 G.W. Henry 6 5 .545 5 3 .625 (H) 1962 Ned Wulk (NCAA) 23 4 .852 10 0 1.000 1st (B) 1915 George Schaeffer 2 2 .500 1 1 .500 (H) 1963 Ned Wulk (NCAA) 26 3 .897 9 1 .900 1st (W) 1916 (No Team) 1964 Ned Wulk (NCAA) 16 11 .593 7 3 .700 T1st (W) 1917 George Schaeffer 0 1 .000 0 1 .000 (H) 1965 Ned Wulk 13 14 .481 4 6 .400 5th (W) 1918 George Cooper 14 4 .778 12 4 .750 (H) 1966 Ned Wulk 12 14 .461 3 7 .300 6th (W) 1919 George Cooper 3 4 .429 3 3 .500 (H) 1967 Ned Wulk 5 21 .192 1 9 .100 6th (W) 1920 George Cooper 5 3 .625 4 2 .667 (H) 1968 Ned Wulk 11 17 .393 4 6 .400 T4th (W) 1921 George Cooper 11 3 .786 8 2 .800 (H) 1969 Ned Wulk 11 15 .423 4 6 .400 T5th (W) 1922 George Cooper 10 1 .909 9 1 .900 (H) 1970 Ned Wulk 4 22 .154 2 12 .143 8th (W) 1923 Ernest Willis 8 4 .667 4 0 1.000 1st (J) 1971 Ned Wulk 16 10 .615 8 6 .571 4th (W) 1924 Aaron McCreary 3 9 .250 1 4 .200 4th (J) 1972 Ned Wulk 18 8 .692 9 5 .643 T2nd (W) 1925 Aaron McCreary 11 6 .647 9 5 .643 1st (J) 1973 Ned Wulk (NCAA) 19 9 .679 10 4 .714 1st (W) 1926 Aaron McCreary 9 3 .750 4 1 .800 1st -
Impact of Western TV Channels on Viewers of Bangladesh
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by KDI School Archives Impact of Western TV Channels on Viewers of Bangladesh By: Md. Jalal Abdul Naser Bhuiyan THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 2007 Impact of Western TV Channels on Viewers of Bangladesh By: Md. Jalal Abdul Naser Bhuiyan THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 2007 Impact of Western TV Channels on Viewers of Bangladesh By: Md. Jalal Abdul Naser Bhuiyan THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 2007 Approval as of .……., 2007 Supervisor Kim Kyong-Dong Impact of Western TV Channels on Viewers of Bangladesh By Md. Jalal Abdul Naser Bhuiyan Abstract Bangladesh is a moderate Muslim country. But it is highly influenced by the Indian society and culture. Different ruling parties tried to resist this Indian influence. Because of geographical nearness, they failed to do it. With the emergence of satellite television after 1992, this Indian influence or the so called Indianisation became overwhelming. This influx of Indian Hindu culture was a shock to some fundamental Muslim and also some Highbrow. Western TV Channels to some extent replaced the Indian influenced. Especially, the Highbrow and the Lowbrow with High Taste embraced this Western culture. For some conservative Muslim, it was like an eye opener. -
Rebranding Strategy: a Case Study of Star TV
International Journal of Business Management and Economics Research. ISSN 2349-2333 Volume 2, Number 1 (2015), pp. 73-82 © International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Rebranding Strategy: A Case Study Of Star TV Adit jha Assistant Professor Shekhawati Institute of Management ,Sikar ABSTRACT Every company expand themselves for earning profits, gaining market share, making new loyal customer base, tapping new markets. Rebranding is one of the best methods to approach new customers, to step in the new untapped markets. Star T.V. has rebranded it’s sports channel and channel rename it’s brand ESPN. In November 2014 Channel announced that they are going to make huge investment in India. Star concentrate and understand the concept of language differences and traditional games in India. This paper is a case study of star sport channel which rebrand itself in India for increasing it’s market share with the huge investment of Rs20 thousand caror within 3 to 4 years for rebranding new channels. Company added some new channel in it’s portfolio so that they can earn maximum profit Paper will analysis the strategy behind rebranding of sport channel and will try to understand branding concepts through rebranding strategy. KEYWORDS: STAR SPORTS, REBRANDING, BRANDING, PORTFOLIO. I. INTRODUCTION Star Sports network jointly owned by Star TV and Fox International channels star sports showing sports programme in India, Singapor, maleshiya, Sri Lanka, Thiland, Indonashia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Philippines, Hong Kong, and other Asian territory [1]. Star Sports channel is a premier channel in India for sports lovers. Star TV network rebrand it’s sport channel with huge investment in India the amount is Rs. -
An Economic Analysis of the Prime Time Access Rule
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In re: Review of the Prime Time Access Rule, Section 73.658 (k) of the Commission’s } MM Docket No. 94-123 Rules AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PRIME TIME ACCESS RULE March 7, 1995 ECONOMISTS INCORPORATED WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTENTS I. Introduction……………………………...……………………………………………1 II. Is ABC, CBS or NBC Dominant Today? A. No single network dominates any market...........................................................5 B. Factors facilitating the growth of competing video distributors ................................................................................................7 1. Cable penetration ....................................................................................7 2. Number and strength of independent stations.........................................9 3. Other video outlets................................................................................12 C. Competing video distributors............................................................................13 1. New broadcast networks .......................................................................13 2. New cable networks..............................................................................16 3. First-run syndication .............................................................................17 D. Impact on networks of increased competition ..................................................18 1. Audience shares ....................................................................................18 -
Rocky Mountain Prime Sports Network
REGIONAL SPORTS PROGRAMMING SERVICES IN WHICH ARC HAS AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST Network Region* Home Sports Entertainment Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas Home Team Sports** Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Prime Sports Network -- Rocky Mountain Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Wyoming Prime Sports Network -- Midwest Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin Prime Sports Network -- Upper Midwest Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin Sunshine Network Florida * The regions include all or a portion of the designated states. Consequently, different portions of the same state may be included in multiple regions. ** ARC owns a 33.3 percent limited partnership interest in Home Team Sports. ARC also recently acquired a 33.3 percent general partnership interest in Prism/Philadelphia Sports Channel. Exhibit 1 REGIONAL SPORTS PROGRAMMING SERVICES AFFILIATED WITH PRIME NETWORK In addition to the six regional services in which ARC has an ownership interest, the following regional sports programming services are affiliated with the Prime Network: Network Region* Empire Sports Network New York KBL Sports Network Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia Madison Square Garden Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York New England Sports Network Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont Prime Sports Network -- Intermountain West Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming Prime Sports Northwest Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington Prime Ticket Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Nevada Pro Am Sports System Michigan SportSouth Network Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee * The regions include all or a portion of the designated states. Consequently, different portions of the same state may be included in multiple regions. -
1. Matter of Competition, Rate Deregulation and the Commission's Policies Relating to the Provision of Cable Television Servic
Coalition for Competitive Access to Content (CA2C) Vertical Integration Relevant to Program Access Legislation Draft of 1990, 1994, 2006 Comparison The resources for this summary comparison were: 1. Matter of Competition, Rate Deregulation and the Commission’s Policies Relating to the Provision of Cable Television Service, Report, 5 FCC Rcd 4962 (1990) (“1990 FCC Cable Report”). 2. Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for Delivery of Video Programming, First Report, 9 FCC Rcd 7442 (1994). 3. The CA2C 2006 Draft Summary of Vertical Integration This summary document compares vertical integration from 1990, before the program access rules were passed, 1994, after they were enacted, and the current profile. The CA2C does not present this data in the belief that all relevant data is either here or fully accurate. We do believe that this represents a fair starting point to understand an expanded portrait of the industry structures we are working with and how they have changed over time. We again request that the Commission share this information with the referenced cable companies and other major media conglomerates for their review, validation, correction, and expansion as appropriate. The CA2C would like to see this review process result in an accurate composite picture 1 that all parties will endorse as we continue to work on the relevant policy issues. Coalition for Competitive Access to Content (CA2C) Vertical Integration Relevant to Program Access Legislation Draft of 1990, 1994, 2006 Comparison • A “yes” means the programming was subject to vertical integration. • A “Blank” means the programming was cancelled or we have lost track. -
2010 United Football League Media Guide
TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED FOOTBALL LEAGUE™ League Directory ..................................................................... 5 Front O ce ............................................................................... 9 League History ....................................................................... 25 2010 Schedule ....................................................................... 33 TV Information....................................................................... 35 Florida Tuskers ....................................................................... 43 Hartford Colonials ................................................................. 85 Las Vegas Locomotives .......................................................125 Omaha Nighthawks .............................................................169 Sacramento Mountain Lions ...............................................213 Expansion 2011 ...................................................................255 2009 Season .........................................................................259 2009 Statistics ......................................................................275 ™ All Time Roster .....................................................................290 Media Guidelines .................................................................297 Compiled and edited by UFL PR sta JACKSONVILLE OFFICE NEW YORK OFFICE 135 West Bay Street 420 Lexington Ave. Suite 500 Suite 1825 Jacksonville, FL 32202 New York, NY 10170 Layout and design by: (ph) 904.598.1031