Arxiv:0804.4142V1 [Astro-Ph]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version April 25, 2008 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 IMPROVED COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM NEW, OLD AND COMBINED SUPERNOVA DATASETS M. Kowalski1, D. Rubin2,3, G. Aldering2, R. J. Agostinho4, A. Amadon5, R. Amanullah6, C. Balland7, K. Barbary2,3, G. Blanc8, P. J. Challis9, A. Conley10, N. V. Connolly11, R. Covarrubias12, K. S. Dawson2, S. E. Deustua13, R. Ellis14, S. Fabbro15, V. Fadeyev16, X. Fan17, B. Farris18, G. Folatelli12, B. L. Frye19, G. Garavini20, E. L. Gates21, L. Germany22, G. Goldhaber2,3, B. Goldman23, A. Goobar20, D. E. Groom2, J. Haissinski24, D. Hardin7, I. Hook25, S. Kent26, A. G. Kim2, R. A. Knop27, C. Lidman28, E. V. Linder6, J. Mendez29,30, J. Meyers2,3, G. J. Miller31, M. Moniez24, A. M. Mourao˜ 15, H. Newberg32, S. Nobili20, P. E. Nugent2, R. Pain7, O. Perdereau24, S. Perlmutter2,3, M. M. Phillips33, V. Prasad2, R. Quimby14, N. Regnault7, J. Rich5, E. P. Rubenstein34, P. Ruiz-Lapuente30, F. D. Santos35, B. E. Schaefer36, R. A. Schommer37, R. C. Smith38, A. M. Soderberg14, A. L. Spadafora2, L.-G. Strolger39, M. Strovink2,3, N. B. Suntzeff40, N. Suzuki2, R. C. Thomas2, N. A. Walton41, L. Wang40, W. M. Wood-Vasey9, J. L. Yun4 (Supernova Cosmology Project) Draft version April 25, 2008 ABSTRACT We present a new compilation of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), a new dataset of low-redshift nearby- Hubble-flow SNe and new analysis procedures to work with these heterogeneous compilations. This “Union” compilation of 414 SN Ia, which reduces to 307 SNe after selection cuts, includes the recent large samples of SNe Ia from the Supernova Legacy Survey and ESSENCE Survey, the older datasets, as well as the recently extended dataset of distant supernovae observed with HST. A single, consistent and blind analysis procedure is used for all the various SN Ia subsamples, and a new procedure is implemented that consistently weights the heterogeneous data sets and rejects outliers. We present the latest results from this Union compilation and discuss the cosmological constraints from this new compilation and its combination with other cosmological measurements (CMB and BAO). The +0.027 +0.036 constraint we obtain from supernovae on the dark energy density is ΩΛ =0.713−0.029(stat)−0.039(sys), for a flat, ΛCDM Universe. Assuming a constant equation of state parameter, w, the combined +0.059 +0.063 constraints from SNe, BAO and CMB give w = 0.969−0.063(stat)−0.066(sys). While our results are consistent with a cosmological constant, we obtain− only relatively weak constraints on a w that varies with redshift. In particular, the current SN data do not yet significantly constrain w at z > 1. With the addition of our new nearby Hubble-flow SNe Ia, these resulting cosmological constraints are currently the tightest available. Subject headings: Supernovae: general — cosmology: observations—cosmological parameters 1 Institut f¨ur Physik, Humboldt-Universit¨at zu Berlin, Newton- Lisbon, Portugal strasse 15, Berlin 12489, Germany 16 2 Department of Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 17 3 Steward Observatory, the University of Arizona, Tucson , AZ Department of Physics, University of California Berkeley, 85721, USA Berkeley, 94720-7300 CA, USA 18 Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana- 4 Centro de Astronomia e Astrof´ısica da Universidade de Lisboa, arXiv:0804.4142v1 [astro-ph] 25 Apr 2008 Champaign, 1110 West Green, Urbana, IL 61801-3080, USA Observat´orio Astron´omico de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 19 Department of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Lisbon, Portugal 5 Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, 20 Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Albanova France 6 University Center, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, 21 Lick Observatory, P.O. Box 85, Mount Hamilton, CA 95140, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 7 USA LPNHE, CNRS-IN2P3, University of Paris VI & VII, Paris, 22 Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne France 8 University of Technology, John St., Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Aus- APC, Universit´e Paris 7, 10 rue Alice Domon et L´eonie tralia Duquet, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France 23 9 M.P.I.A., K¨onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University, 60 Garden Street, 24 Laboratoire de l’Acc´elerateur Lin´eaire, IN2P3-CNRS, Uni- Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 10 versit´eParis Sud, B.P. 34, 91898 Orsay Cedex, France Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of 25 Sub-Department of Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Toronto, 60 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H8, Canada 11 Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK Department of Physics, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 26 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, 13323, USA 12 Batavia, IL 60510, USA Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 27 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt Univer- Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 9110, USA 13 sity, Nashville, TN 37240, USA American Astronomical Society, 2000 Florida Ave, NW, Suite 28 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, 400, Washington, DC, 20009 USA 14 Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile California Institute of Technology, E. California Blvd, 29 Isaac Newton Group, Apartado de Correos 321, 38780 Santa Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 15 Cruz de La Palma, Islas Canarias, Spain CENTRA e Dep. de Fisica, IST, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049 30 Department of Astronomy, University of Barcelona, 2 1. INTRODUCTION future generation of SN compilations. These include the The evidence for dark energy has evolved from the first following major goals: hints, for the case of a flat Universe (Perlmutter et al. (1) It is important to add a new low-redshift SN Ia 1998; Garnavich et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998), sample to complement the large and rapidly grow- through the more definite evidence for the general ing number of distant SNe. Especially valuable case of unconstrained curvature (Riess et al. 1998; are the SNe in the smooth, nearby Hubble-flow Perlmutter et al. 1999), to the current work which aims (z above 0.02). Since this part of the Hub- to explore the properties of dark energy (for a review see ble diagram∼ is currently not well constrained, new Perlmutter & Schmidt 2003). Several new cosmological nearby SNe lead to a relatively large incremental measurement techniques and several new Type Ia super- improvement (Linder 2006). It is interesting to nova (SN Ia) datasets have helped begin the laborious note, that the largest contribution in this redshift process of narrowing in on the parameters that describe range still comes from the landmark Calan/Tololo the cosmological model. The SN Ia measurements re- survey (Hamuy et al, 1993). main a key ingredient in all current determinations of cosmological parameters (see, e.g., the recent CMB re- (2) The analysis should reflect the heterogeneous na- sults (Dunkley et al. 2008)). It is therefore necessary to ture of the data set. In particular, it is important understand how the current world dataset of SN Ia mea- that a sample of poorer quality will not degrade surements is constructed, and how it can be used coher- the impact of the higher quality data, such as the ently, particularly since no one SN Ia sample by itself Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) and ESSENCE provides an accurate cosmological measurement. high-redshift datasets which have recently been Until recently, the SN Ia compilations published. (e.g., Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999, Tonry et al. 2003, Knop et al. 2003, Astier et al. 2006 (3) The different supernova datasets should be ana- and Wood-Vasey et al. 2007) primarily consisted of lyzed with the same analysis procedure. The pre- a relatively uniform high-redshift (z 0.5) dataset vious compilations combined measurements and from a single study put together with∼ a low-redshift peak-magnitude fits that were obtained with dis- (z 0.05) sample collected in a different study or parate lightcurve fitting functions and analysis pro- studies.∼ However, once there were several independent cedures, particularly for handling the color correc- datasets at high redshift it became more important and tion for both extinction and any intrinsic color lu- interesting to see the cosmological constraints obtainable minosity relation. by combining several groups’ work. Riess et al. (2004, (4) A reproducible, well-characterized approach to se- 2007) provided a first compilation analysis of this kind, lecting the good SNe Ia, and rejecting the ques- drawing on data chosen from Perlmutter et al. (1999); tionable and outlier SNe, should be used. Pre- Riess et al. (1998); Schmidt et al. (1998); Knop et al. vious compilations relied to a large extent on (2003); Tonry et al. (2003) and Barris et al. (2004). the heterogeneous classification information pro- Many of the subsequent cosmology studies have used vided by the original authors. The selection pro- this compilation as the representation of the SN Ia cess was somewhat subjective: The Gold compila- sample, in particular the selection of supernovae that tion of Riess et al. (2004, 2007) excluded SNe that Riess et al. (2004, 2007) nicknamed the “Gold” sample. Knop et al. (2003) considered comparably well- Other recent compilations that have been used are that confirmed SNe Ia. of Wood-Vasey et al. (2007) and Davis et al. (2007). At present a number of updates should be made to the (5) To the extent possible, the analysis should not in- SN Ia datasets, and a number of analysis issues should troduce biases into the fit, including some that be addressed, including several that will recur with every have only recently been recognized as being present in methods of determining extinction properties of Barcelona, Spain SNe Ia.