DOCSLIB.ORG

Kowloon City DURF and DURF Secretariat Attn.: Lily Y.M.YAM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kowloon City DURF and DURF Secretariat Attn.: Lily Y.M.YAM E0048 From: ------------------------------ Date: Jun 30, 2013 12:01 To: --------------------------------, <[email protected]> Subj: SIA Report Submission to DURF Kowloon City DURF and DURF Secretariat Attn.: Lily Y.M.YAM, Dear Kowloon City DURF members and DURF secretariat, As you may know, we are a group of postgraduate students from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. We have completed a SIA report for 13 Streets, one of the priority redevelopment area in the DURF planning. Please kindly find our report as the enclosed for DURF's reference. Shall you have any inquiry, please contact Sango Shek by email ------------------------------ Best regards, Sango Shek, Chau-san Master of Social Policy and Social Development, Hong Kong Polytechnic University Social Impact Assessment Report for Redevelopment of 13 Streets 28 May 2013 Submitted to Kowloon City District Urban Renewal Forum SIA Report for Redevelopment of 13 Streets Social Impact Assessment Report for Redevelopment of 13 Streets Submitted by Postgraduate students of Master of Social Policy and Social Development, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Zhang Li (Kathleen), Shek Chau San (Sango), Hung Ming Chung (Morris), Wong Man Hsuen (Yolanda), Siu Ka Yi (Kathy), Wong Shiu Hung (Brian), Lee Suk Ling (Tammy), Huang Ying Si (Rain), Leung Chi Hang (Clement), He Qinqin (Piana), Hu Kailing (Kelly), Wai Wai LWIN Academic Instructors: Dr. David Ip, Fu Keung, Mr. Felix Ng, Sai Kit 2 SIA Report for Redevelopment of 13 Streets Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... 3 Index of Tables ............................................................................................................... 6 Index of Figures ............................................................................................................. 6 Index of Photos .............................................................................................................. 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 9 Background ............................................................................................................ 9 Aim of the Study .................................................................................................... 9 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 10 Key impacts identified ......................................................................................... 11 Statement of predicted future in different scenarios ............................................ 12 Mitigation measures for redevelopment .............................................................. 12 Recommendations ................................................................................................ 13 1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 16 1.1 Location and Physical Setting ........................................................................ 16 1.2 Issues on redevelopment ................................................................................ 19 2. Methodology ............................................................................................................ 21 2.1 Overview of methodology ............................................................................. 21 2.2 Research Design............................................................................................. 21 2.2.1 Compiling Baseline Condition ............................................................ 21 2.2.2 Preliminary Impacts Identification ..................................................... 21 2.2.3 Public Engagement ............................................................................. 22 2.3 Data analyses ................................................................................................. 23 2.4 Limitations ..................................................................................................... 24 3. Baseline Condition – Community Profile ................................................................ 25 3.1 History............................................................................................................ 25 3.2 Land use ......................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Demographic characteristics .......................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Age distributions ................................................................................. 27 3.2.2 Ethnicity .............................................................................................. 28 3.4 Economic status ............................................................................................. 28 3.4 Lifestyle ......................................................................................................... 30 3.5 Housing .......................................................................................................... 31 3.6 Local Economy .............................................................................................. 37 3.7 Community services....................................................................................... 40 3.8 Community Amenities ................................................................................... 42 3.9 Transportation ................................................................................................ 43 3 SIA Report for Redevelopment of 13 Streets 3.10 Public Order ................................................................................................. 44 3.11 Prospects of the community ......................................................................... 45 4. Impact Identifications and Analyses ........................................................................ 47 4.1 Issues Raised in Consultation and Public Engagement ................................. 47 4.2 Impacts Raised in Consultation and Public Engagement .............................. 49 4.2.1 Negative Impacts from Expert Consultation....................................... 49 4.2.2 Negative Impacts from Public Engagement ....................................... 50 4.3 Predictions for Future Development without Redevelopment............... 50 4.4 Impacts Analysis ............................................................................................ 51 4.4.1 Problems on Relocation and local rehousing ...................................... 53 4.4.2 Unaffordable living standards (C5) .................................................... 53 4.4.3 Change of economic base ................................................................... 54 4.4.4 Dramatic Social Changes and Conflicts ............................................. 54 4.4.5 Dissolution of local culture and community (C4)............................... 55 4.4.6 Pollutions during Construction Period (I6) ......................................... 55 4.4.7 Ethnic Minority Communities being left out and their needs being ignored (H4) ................................................................................................. 55 4.5 Interactive Impacts Matrix and Relevant Impacts Analysis .......................... 55 4.7.1 Triggering Stress and Anxiety among Affected People (X1) .............. 56 4.7.2 Increasing demand of land to restore the original community (X2) ... 56 4.7.3 Changes of Local Economy and Employment Structure (X3) ........... 56 4.7.4 A New community composition will emerge (X4) ............................. 57 4.6 Case Study for Affected Groups .................................................................... 57 4.6.1 Case 1: Ethnic Minorities, an Indian................................................... 57 4.6.2 Case 2: Owners of Garage in Lun Cheong Street No.22 .................... 57 4.6.3 Case 3: Tenants of Subdivided unit in Ying Yeung Street No.24 ....... 58 4.6.4 Case 4: Property Owners in Lun Cheong Street No.23 ...................... 59 4.6.5 Case 5: Older People in 13 Streets ...................................................... 59 4.6.6 Case 6: Property Owners in Fung Yi Street ........................................ 59 5. Scenario Generations ............................................................................................... 61 5.1 Scenario 1- 13 Streets without any plan for redevelopment .......................... 61 5.2 Scenario 2- 13 Streets with redevelopment by URA-initiated mode ............. 62 5.3 Summary ........................................................................................................ 62 6. Evaluation of Well-beings ........................................................................................ 64 7. Mitigation ................................................................................................................. 69 Individual impacts ................................................................................................ 69 Household impacts ............................................................................................... 69 Community impact............................................................................................... 70 4 SIA Report for Redevelopment of 13 Streets 8. Recommendation ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hong Kong Final Report
    Urban Displacement Project Hong Kong Final Report Meg Heisler, Colleen Monahan, Luke Zhang, and Yuquan Zhou Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Research Questions 5 Outline 5 Key Findings 6 Final Thoughts 7 Introduction 8 Research Questions 8 Outline 8 Background 10 Figure 1: Map of Hong Kong 10 Figure 2: Birthplaces of Hong Kong residents, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016 11 Land Governance and Taxation 11 Economic Conditions and Entrenched Inequality 12 Figure 3: Median monthly domestic household income at LSBG level, 2016 13 Figure 4: Median rent to income ratio at LSBG level, 2016 13 Planning Agencies 14 Housing Policy, Types, and Conditions 15 Figure 5: Occupied quarters by type, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016 16 Figure 6: Domestic households by housing tenure, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016 16 Public Housing 17 Figure 7: Change in public rental housing at TPU level, 2001-2016 18 Private Housing 18 Figure 8: Change in private housing at TPU level, 2001-2016 19 Informal Housing 19 Figure 9: Rooftop housing, subdivided housing and cage housing in Hong Kong 20 The Gentrification Debate 20 Methodology 22 Urban Displacement Project: Hong Kong​ | ​1 Quantitative Analysis 22 Data Sources 22 Table 1: List of Data Sources 22 Typologies 23 Table 2: Typologies, 2001-2016 24 Sensitivity Analysis 24 Figures 10 and 11: 75% and 25% Criteria Thresholds vs. 70% and 30% Thresholds 25 Interviews 25 Quantitative Findings 26 Figure 12: Population change at TPU level, 2001-2016 26 Figure 13: Change in low-income households at TPU Level, 2001-2016 27 Typologies 27 Figure 14: Map of Typologies, 2001-2016 28 Table 3: Table of Draft Typologies, 2001-2016 28 Typology Limitations 29 Interview Findings 30 The Gentrification Debate 30 Land Scarcity 31 Figures 15 and 16: Google Earth Images of Wan Chai, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Age0+ Final Report
    Executive Summary In view of the current spatial issues and future development uncertainty, Age0+ is commissioned by DUPAD, HKU to provide consultancy services regarding creating an Age- friendly Community Plan for Kowloon City. Baseline review and evaluation as well as two community engagement exercise are conducted to understand community needs and aspirations towards an age-friendly Kowloon City. A draft AFCP was formulated and revised with community feedbacks, and the plan is assessed with sustainability impact indicators. The Age0+ AFCP for Kowloon City is formulated by three important building blocks, namely Healthy Network, Seamless Connectivity and Ageing in Vibrancy & Resilience. Individual proposals are suggested, referencing identified planning issues, planning opportunities and considering implementation schedule and feasibility. Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) has reflected a positive result for the AFCP. 「樂」康居 Healthy Network 1 Health corridors at 7 distributor roads 2 Urban natural trail near Ko Shan Theatre 3 Hoi Sham Park improvement works 4 Diversified waterfront 5 Smart building rehabilitation and retrofitting scheme in old buildings 「齡」距離 Seamless Connectivity 6 Smart Silver Zone near To Kwa Wan Market 7 MTR pedestrian access enhancement at 2 MTR stations 8 Silver bus route connecting 2 hospitals 9 Intergenerational universal access programme in old buildings 「家」智融 Ageing in Vibrancy and Resilience 10 Industrial revitalization in OU(B) areas of Hung Hom 11 Smart outpost & facilities enhancement in To Kwa Wan Municipal Building 12 Intergenerational co-living village at Sung Wong Toi Road 13 Art and cultural hub in Cattle Depot 14 Elderly community centre and rehabilitation walkway in Hung Hom 15 Sung Wong Toi complex As the summary of our AFCP, we have 13 spatial planning proposals with policy suggestions proposed additionally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Renewal Plan for Kowloon City 3
    People First 以人為先 District-based 地區為本 District-based Public Participatory 與民共議 Participatory Public �龍城市區更新地區諮詢平市區更新地區諮詢平台台 Kowloon City DURF Table of Contents Background 1. Introduction 1 2. Objectives 1 3. Overview of the Kowloon City District 2 4. Formulation of the Urban Renewal Plan for Kowloon City 3 Recommendations 5. Vision 13 6. Recommendations of the Urban Renewal Plan 13 Basic Framework 13 Urban Renewal Proposals 18 Shaping District Character “5 Streets” and “13 Streets” Area, To Kwa Wan 19 Nga Tsin Wai Road Area, Lung Tong 24 To Kwa Wan Central 37 Wuhu Street / Winslow Street / Gillies Avenue South Area, 42 Hung Hom Revitalising Heritage and Designation of Themed Walking Trail 52 Enhancing Waterfront and District Connectivity 64 Optimising Land Resources for Urban Renewal 75 7. Social Impact Mitigation Measures 78 8. Conclusion 82 Appendix I Composition and Terms of Reference of Kowloon City District Urban Renewal Forum Appendix II Summary of Kowloon City Urban Renewal Proposals Background 1. Introduction 1.1 The Government promulgated the “Urban Renewal Strategy” (URS) in February 2011 adopting the “People First, District-based and Public Participatory” approach in undertaking urban renewal, and embracing the new proposal of setting up District Urban Renewal Forum (DURF) in old urban districts to strengthen the urban renewal planning at district level. In June 2011, the first pilot DURF was established in Kowloon City. The DURF is chaired by a professional who is familiar with urban renewal issues and its members are drawn from different professions and local organizations, including District Council / Area Committee Members, representatives from local non-government organisations, and representatives of relevant government bureau / departments and the Urban Renewal Authority (URA).
    [Show full text]
  • Ma Tau Kok Area/ Kowloon City Road (Kai Tak Tunnel West Portal)
    Appendix 3.10 Estimated Communities within the Exceedance Zone of Annual NO2 Appendix 3.10 Estimated Communities within the Exceedance Zone of Annual NO2 Introduction 1. To estimate the likely size of the affected communities within the exceedance zone of annual NO2, a survey has been conducted in April 2016. 2. The exceedance zones of annual NO2 cover playgrounds, schools, shops and residential areas as mentioned in Table 3-13 and Table 3-17 of the main text. The exposure to NO2 for the users of playgrounds, the students in the schools and the staff in the shops or restaurants should be limited as they will not stay continuously for 24 hours a day and 365 days a year. Hence, the actual exposure to the NO2 shall be less than predicted. Therefore, only the number of units (shops or school), but not the population, are presented in this appendix for reference purpose. The residential regions are considered to have a long term NO2 exposure and thus the estimation of the likely size of the affected communities within the exceedance zone of annual NO2 is based only on the number of dwellings. 3. The likely size of affected communities within the exceedance zones of annual NO2 would be the highest in the worst assessment year (2023) based on the Figure 3-6K to Figure 3-6P. Assumptions 4. A number of assumptions were made in the community survey and listed as follows: No change in the number of shops and residential flats over the assessment years (from Year 2016 to Year 2023); Each flat consists of 1 dwelling only (no unauthorized partitioned unit is considered); Based on “Population Census” issued by Census and Statistics Department for To Kwa Wan and Kowloon City districts in 2011, the average number of occupant per unit, 2.88, was adopted to calculate the affected population within the exceedance zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Events and Meetings / 近期活動及會議
    五月號 / May 2013 Recent Events and Meetings / 近期活動及會議 Discussion Forum on New Railway Development and Improved Traffic Distribution among the Road Harbour Crossings The Office of Hon. Tony Tse invited HKIUD members to the Discussion Forum on New Railway Development and Improve Traffic Distribution among the Road Harbour Crossing on 3 May 2013. Prof. Bernard Lim, President attended on behalf of HKIUD. "Walkable City, Living Street" Conference Civic Exchange invited HKIUD members to participate in the ‘Walkable City, Living Streets’ conference on 7 May 2013 for which HKIUD is a supporting organisation. Mr. Ivan Ho, Public Affairs Committee Chairman and Mr. Widemar Spruijt, Public Affairs Committee member attended on behalf of HKIUD. More Joint Institutes Briefing Session for HKIA, HKIUD and HKIP Members on Enhancing Land Supply Strategy, Reclamation Outside Victoria Harbour and Rock Cavern Development Prof. Bernard Lim, President, Mr. Charles Li, Hon Treasurer, Mr. Jeff Ho, Council Member, Mr. Alvin Kan, Graduate Representative and Ms. Kady Wong, Student Member attendedthe Briefing Session on 15 May 2013. Mr. Ivan Ho attended as Moderator. More Opening Ceremony & Forum of The 13th Venice Biennale International Architecture Exhibition Hong Kong Response Exhibition Mr. Bernie Harrad, Hon. Secretary attended the Opening Ceremony on 18 May 2013. The ‘Inter Cities/Intra Cities: Ghostwriting The Future’ - 'I AM HOME', co-organized by the Hong Kong Institute of Architects and Hong Kong Arts Development Council, is now being held at Fly the Flyover01 (FF01) adjacent to EKEO till 18 June 2013. Joint Institutes Briefing Session for HKIA, HKILA, HKIP and HKIUD Members on Pedestrian Environment Improvement Scheme in Yuen Long Town 14 Members attended the Joint Institutes Briefing Session.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 4 Meeting of the 5 Term Kowloon City District Council Date
    Minutes of the 4th Meeting of the 5th Term Kowloon City District Council Date: 7 July 2016 (Thursday) Time: 2:30 p.m. Venue: Conference Room, Kowloon City District Office Present: Chairman: Mr PUN Kwok-wah Vice-chairman: Mr CHO Wui-hung Members: Dr KWONG Po-yin Dr the Hon LEUNG Mei-fun, Priscilla, SBS, JP (Arrived at 2:58 p.m.) (Left at 4:20 p.m.) Miss LEUNG Yuen-ting Mr HO Hin-ming, MH Ir Dr CHENG Lee-ming Mr NG Fan-kam, Tony Mr TING Kin-wa Mr LAM Tak-shing Mr LAM Pok, Jimmy Mr YUE Chee-wing, Admond Mr YEUNG Chun-yu, Ronald Mr HE Huahan Mr YANG Wing-kit Mr KWAN Ho-yeung, Roger (Arrived at 3:54 p.m.) Mr LAI Kwong-wai The Hon LEE Wai-king, Starry, SBS, JP (Arrived at 2:40 p.m.) (Left at 3:35 p.m.) Mr SIU Leong-sing Mr LUK King-kwong Mr SIU Tin-hung, Terence Mr NG Po-keung Secretary: Miss LAM Yuk-ying, Alletta Senior Executive Officer (District Council), Kowloon City District Office Absent: Mr LO Chiu-kit Ir CHEUNG Yan-hong, MH In Attendance: Mr Franco KWOK, JP District Officer (Kowloon City) Miss CHONG Tan-na, Tanna Assistant District Officer (Kowloon City) Ms LAU Mei-yee, Helen Senior Liaison Officer (Special Duties & Ho Man Tin), Kowloon City District Office Ms IP Yuk-mei, Eunice Senior Liaison Officer (District Liaison), Kowloon City District Office Mr WONG Kam-keung, Eric Senior Liaison Officer (Building Management), Kowloon City District Office - 1 - Ms KWOK Lai-kuen, Eva Senior Executive Officer (District Management), Kowloon City District Office Ms CHEUNG Ching, Jocelyn District Commander (Kowloon City), Hong Kong Police Force Mr
    [Show full text]
  • Hung Hom Ho Man Tin Lung Tong Kai Tak Development
    Former Yamen Building of Kowloon Walled City Remnants of the South Gate of Kowloon Walled City PRINCE EDWARD ROAD EAST CARPENTER ROAD Proposed Underground Lung Tsun and Shopping Street Lok Sin Tong Granite Lintels KAI TAK STATION (inside Lok Sin Tong Primary School) HAU WONG ROAD Remnants of JUNCTION ROAD NGA TSIN WAI ROAD Lung Tsun No. 29 Stone Bridge Hau Wong Raod KAI TAK RIVER Nos. 1&3 Hau Wong Raod Olympic Garden KAI TAK DEVELOPMENT AREA Sung Wong Toi Inscription Rock inside the Sung Wong Toi Garden S.K.H. Holy Trinity Church TO KWA WAN STATION Sung Wong Toi Garden Old Far East Flying Training School KAI TAK TUNNEL ARGYLE STREET SUNG WONG TOI ROAD LUNG TONG MOK CHEON D A G STREET RO MA TAU CHUNG ROAD MA TAU KOK ROAD UNG K TAM TO KWA WAN STREET I SAN SHAN ROAD “13 Streets” PAK TA Ex-Ma Tau Kok MA HANG Animal Quarantine Depot (Cattle Depot) CHUNG “5 Streets” ROAD MA TAU WAI ROAD WAI TAU MA ROAD SHEUNG TY HEUN G RD KWEI CHOW STREET TO KWA WAN ROAD KOWLOONOAD CI LOK SHAN ROAD HO MAN TIN MA TAU WAI STATION WAI TAU MA ELEVATED R Legend AT STREET Proposed Redevelopment Priority Area YUK Y (led by Urban Renewal Authority and/or privately-led) CHI KIANG S FAT KWONG STREET Hoi Sham Park Fishtail Rock NGAN HON STREETTREE Proposed Rehabilitation and Revitalisation T Priority Area (include street beautification and greening measures, etc.) REET Proposed Mixed Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Area Eight “Wan” SUNG ON ST Streets HUNG HOM Redevelopment Projects being Undertaken / BAILEY STREET Announced by Urban Renewal Authority Proposed Themed
    [Show full text]
  • “People First, District-Based, Public Participatory” Approach for Urban Renewal 1 Governmental Planning Department
    Lily Y.M. YAM Lily “People First, District-based, Public Participatory” Approach for Urban Renewal – a Practical Case of the Kowloon City District Urban Renewal Forum Lily Y.M. YAM1 – “People First, District First, “People Abstract After more than two years of review, the new Urban Renewal Strategy (URS) was promulgated in February 2011. One of the key principles promoted in the new URS is the adoption of the “People First, District-based, Public Participatory” approach for urban renewal. The Kowloon City District Urban Renewal Forum (DURF) was set up in June 2011 as a pioneer to put this approach into practice. As the Secretary to DURF, the author - wishes to share with practitioners in the planning and relevant fields the pioneering R Urban for Approach Participatory” Public based, experience of DURF and its work. 1. District Urban Renewal Forum With the changing aspirations of the community and the call for more public participation in shaping the future of our city, the new URS calls for active promotion of the “People First, District-based, Public Participatory” approach at the early planning stage of urban renewal and embraces the new initiative of setting up a DURF in old urban districts to strengthen urban renewal planning at the district level. As an advisory platform, DURF will advise the Government on district-based urban renewal initiatives from a holistic and comprehensive perspective, including advice on regeneration and redevelopment areas, preservation targets, and implementation models (Urban Renewal Strategy, 2011). The first pilot DURF was set up in June 2011 in Kowloon City, which contains a large number of aged and dilapidated buildings but involving only a few redevelopment projects of the Urban Renewal Authority (URA).
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary June 2014 Study on Urban Renewal Plan for Kowloon City Executive Summary
    Study on Urban Renewal Plan for Executive Summary June 2014 Study on Urban Renewal Plan for Kowloon City Executive Summary Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Project Background 2 Project Objectives 3 Study Methodology 3 Study Area 3 2 Baseline Information 4 3 District Key Issues 5 4 Recommended Urban Renewal Plan 6 Basic Framework 6 Urban Renewal Proposals 8 Shaping District Character 8 “5 Streets” and “13 Streets” Area, To Kwa Wan - Redevelopment 9 Priority Area Nga Tsin Wai Road Area, Lung Tong – Rehabilitation and 11 Revitalisation Priority Area To Kwa Wan Central - Redevelopment Priority Area / Mixed 13 Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Area Wuhu Street, Winslow Street, Gillies Avenue South Area, Hung Hom 15 - Mixed Redevelopment and Rehabilitation Area Revitalising Heritage and Designation of Themed Walking Trail 17 Enhancing Waterfront and District Connectivity 19 Optimising Land Resources 21 5 Conclusion and Way Forward 22 1 Study on Urban Renewal Plan for Kowloon City Executive Summary 1 Introduction Project Background Being one of the old districts in Hong Kong, the Kowloon City District has a history which can be dated back as early as the Southern Sung Dynasty. Buildings aged 50 or above in the district account for about one fourth of the total number of such buildings in the territory, and there are many dilapidated buildings in the District as well. The Urban Renewal Strategy promulgated in 2011 envisages the setting up of the District Urban Renewal Forum (DURF) to strengthen urban renewal planning at the district level, and the adoption of a "People First, District-based, Public Participatory" approach in urban renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Areas at the Intersection of Traditional Areas
    44-CXP-C167 Surviving Hong Kong: A Case Study of Areas at the Intersection of Traditional Areas and Future Development An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science Sponsoring Agency: Urban Renewal Authority Submitted to: On-site Liaison: Michael Ma, Director of Planning and Design Project Advisor: R. Creighton Peet, WPI Professor Project Co-Advisor: Jennifer McWeeny, WPI Professor Submitted By: Denver Cohen Brandon Lam Matthew Michaels Date submitted: 4 Mar. 2016 i Abstract This report, prepared for the Urban Renewal Authority, details the results of a study of two areas in Hong Kong that are threatened by redevelopment: Kowloon City and Kowloon East. The individuality and unique characteristics of these areas suggest that it is worthwhile to retain their original qualities. We suggest that developers consider policies to preserve Kowloon City. We determined that 13 and 5 streets are not important enough to preserve and suggest that future redevelopment be allowed to proceed. ii Acknowledgements We would like to recognize and thank the individuals who contributed to the success of this project and helped make our experience the best it could be: ★ The Urban Renewal Authority, especially Mr. Michael Ma, Mr. Lawrence Mak, and Mr. Michael Kwan; ★ Our Project Advisors, Prof. R. Creighton Peet and Prof. Jennifer McWeeny; ★ The individuals whom we interviewed in Hong Kong. iii Authorship Denver Cohen Denver performed site visits, conducted background research, created all maps used in data analysis, wrote the executive summary, assisted in the writing the background and results and analysis, and edited the executive summary, introduction, methods, and results and analysis chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • 規劃與拓展 Planning and Development 香港規劃師學會期刊– 二零一三年第二十八卷第一期 Journal of the Hong Kong Institute of Planners – Volume 28, Issue No
    規劃與拓展 Planning and Development 香港規劃師學會期刊– 二零一三年第二十八卷第一期 Journal of the Hong Kong Institute of Planners – Volume 28, Issue No. 1, 2013 Contents Page HKIP EDITORIAL COMMITTEE CHIEF EDITOR Mr. Edward LO “People First, District-based, Public Participatory” 1 HON. EDITOR Approach for Urban Renewal – a Practical Case of Prof. Sidney WONG the Kowloon City District Urban Renewal Forum COMMITTEE MEMBERS Lily Y.M. YAM Dr. Ernest LEE Dr. Mee-kam NG Dr. Kenneth TANG Community Engagement in the Kwun Tong Town 17 Dr. Joanna LEE Mr. Kim On CHAN Centre Redevelopment Project – a Practitioner’s Ms. Lily Y.M. YAM Experience Ms. Jannie LEUNG Mr. Yee-ming FU LEE Shu Wing, Ernest Ms. Jacqueline CHEUK HKIP COUNCIL (2013-14) Community-based Approaches as the Key to 34 PRESIDENT Renewal: the Practice and Potential for Hong Kong Mr. Raymond K.W. LEE NG Ka-chui, Isaac VICE-PRESIDENTS Dr. Eunice H.C. MAK Mr. Kenneth L.K. TO Special Paper Planning for Regional Mobility and Connectivity – 47 HON. SECRETARY Mr. Jon C.H. MAK a Key for Strengthening Hong Kong’s Competitiveness HON. TREASURER Mr. Cho Ming LI K.K. LING IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Dr. Peter COOKSON SMITH LIST OF HKIP MEMBERS AS AT JUNE 2013 71 COUNCIL MEMBERS Mr. Kim On CHAN Mr. Lawrence Y.C. CHAU LIST OF REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL PLANNERS 76 Ms. Flora S.K. Lai Ms. Sharon C.G. Liu AS AT JUNE 2013 Ms. Fiona S.Y. LUNG Prof. Bo Sin TANG Dr. Kenneth S.S. TANG Ms. Lily Y.M. YAM Miss Theresa W.S. YEUNG STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5.1B Photographic Records for the Noise Sensitive Receivers
    Appendix 5.1B Photographic Records for the Noise Sensitive Receivers CN1 CN2 CN1: 1 Hing Yan Streets CN2: Ma Tau Kok 13 Streets CN3 CN3: HK society for Blind Hostel CN4 CN4: Ma Tau Kok 13 Streets Scale Date Programme No. 272RS EIA and TIA for Kai Tak Multi-purpose Sports Complex N.T.S. May-16 Project No. Appendix Photographic Records for the Noise Sensitive Receivers IA14016 5.1B CN5 CN5: Sky Tower N1 N1: Ma Tau Kok 13 Streets N2 N2: Sky Tower Scale Date Programme No. 272RS EIA and TIA for Kai Tak Multi-purpose Sports Complex N.T.S. May-16 Project No. Appendix Photographic Records for the Noise Sensitive Receivers IA14016 5.1B TN1 TN1: Sir Robert Black Health Centre TN2 TN2: Lee Kau Yan Memorial School TN3 TN4 TN3: South Masion TN4: Jenford Building Scale Date Programme No. 272RS EIA and TIA for Kai Tak Multi-purpose Sports Complex N.T.S. May-16 Project No. Appendix Photographic Records for the Noise Sensitive Receivers IA14016 5.1B TN5 TN6 TN5: Holy Trinity Church TN6: Parc 22 TN7 TN7: Sky Tower TN8 TN9 TN8: HK Society for Blind Hostel TN9: Ma Tou Kok 13 Streets Scale Date Programme No. 272RS EIA and TIA for Kai Tak Multi-purpose Sports Complex N.T.S. May-16 Project No. Appendix Photographic Records for the Noise Sensitive Receivers IA14016 5.1B TN10 TN12 TN10: Grand Waterfront TN12: Kowloon City Road No. 183 TN11 TN11: Kam Tong Building TN13 TN13: Ma Tou Kok 13 Streets Scale Date Programme No.
    [Show full text]