DOCSLIB.ORG

Cirencester-RTD-I-34.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

~ CA lo4-4-­ o~L, . q)c; ·'-ct \ CIREN~ESTER THE ROMAN TOWN DEFENCES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND SHOPS E£k> L2-l- CJA lOlk~ q3b'24f COTSWOLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST LTD. CIRENCESTEREXCAVATIONS V CIREN CESTER THE ROMAN TOWN DEFENCES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND SHOPS edited by N eil Holbrook WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM A. Barber, J. Bayley, A. Boarder, N. Cooper, T. Darvill, B. Dickinson, N. Faulkner, F. Green, P. Guest, G. Hargreaves, N. Holbrook, B. Langton, A. McWhirr, M. Maltby, J. Miles Paddock, J. Pamment Salvatore, C. Parry, R. Reece, V. Rigby, A. Thomas, J. Timby, L. Viner, J. Wacher, G. Walker, L. Wheeler and K. Wilkinson PRINCIPAL ILLUSTRATOR P. Moore Cotswold Archaeological Trust Cirencester 1998 '· © Authors and Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 1998 Headquarters Building, Unit 9, Kemble Busines~ Park, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL 7 6BQ, England ©Original site archive, Cotswold District Council, 1998 ISBN 0 9523196 3 2 The publication of this volume has been generously supported by English Heritage All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Cotswold Archaeological Trust Ltd Cover illustration: Conjectural reconstruction of the forum of Corinium showing the Jupiter Column. Copyright: Corinium Museum Produced by Past Historic, Kings Stanley, Gloucestershire Printed in Great Britain by J.W. Arrowsmith Ltd., Bristol CONTENTS List of Figures ix List of Tables xiii The Site Codes XV Note on the Presentation of the Dating Evidence xvii INTRODUCTORY SECTIONS PREFACE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN ARCHAEOLOGY IN CIRENCESTER AND FURTHER AFIELD by A.D. McWhirr INTRC>DUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS by N. Holbrook ., 6 THE TOPOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY OF THE CIRENCESTER AREA by N. Holbrook and K. Wilkinson 8 THE ROAD NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF CIRENCESTER by G.H. Hargreaves 11 Appendix: Course of the White Way by G.H. Hargreaves and A.W.F. Boarder 17 FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR MILITARY OCCUPATION by N. Holbrook 18 THE STREET SYSTEM by N. Holbrook and J. Pamment Salvatore Introduction 19 Elements Pre-Dating the Main Grid 19 Creation of the Street Grid 19 Chronology of the Street Grid 22 Later Developments 23 Aspects of Water Supply and Drainage 25 Abandonment of the Street System 26 Gazetteer 26 Cricklade Street by A. Barber and G. Walker 31 THE TOWN DEFENCES by J.S. Wacher and J. Pamment Salvatore Earlier Observations and Investigations 35 The Town Gates 37 Verulamium Gate (JSW) 37 Dating Evidence for the Gate by N. Holbrook 44 Appendix: Re-Assessment of the Reports on the Molluscs Recovered from the Verulamium Gate by K. Wilkinson 46 Bath Gate (JPS) 49 Architectural Fragments by N. Holbrook 51 The Linear Defences 54 City Bank, Watermoor (JSW) 54 South-East Defences (JPS) 56 South Defences (JPS) 58 10 City Bank Road (JPS) 58 121 Watermoor Road (JPS) 59 The Sands, Watermoor (JPS) 59 36 Stepstairs Lane (JPS) 59 VI CIRENCESTER EXCAVATIONS V Watermoor Hospital (JSW) 62 Quems Road (JPS) 64 Waitrose, Sheep Street by B. Langton 67 Appendix: The Geoarchaeology of the Sheep Street site, 1994-5 by K. Wilkinson 70 Sheep Street (JPS) 71 Former Town Station Yard (JPS) 73 North-West Defences (A. McWhirr and JPS) 76 North-East Defences 77 Town Wall and Rampart by JPS and G. Walker 80 North-East Defences (Site AB) (JSW) 84 Architectural Fragments from the Town Wall by N. Holbrook 89 Dating Evidence for the Linear Defences by N. Ho Ibrook 89 Discussion of the Town Defences by JPS 94 THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS THE BASILICA AND FORUM by N. Holbrook and J. Timby 99 Basilica Period I 101 Basilica Period 2 104 Basilica Period 3 108 Basilica Demolition 111 Subsequent Investigations of the Basilica Ill The Forum 113 Pre-Forum Levels 113 Forum Period I 113 Period 2: Reconstruction of the Forum 113 Period 3 115 Period 4 116 General Discussion 119 THE PUBLIC BUILDING IN INSULA VI by J. Timby,T. Darvill and N. Holbrook Introduction 122 Period 1: Military 122 Period 2: Deposits Pre-Dating the Public Building 124 Period 3: Public Building VI. I 129 Period 3a: Later Activity within the Courtyard 135 Ermin Street 138 Architectural Fragments 138 Discussion 139 Appendix 1: Palaeobotanical Analysis of Samples from 2-8 Chester Street by F. Green 140 Appendix 2: The Slags and Metal-Working Residues from 2-8 Chester Street by J. Bayley 140 THE THEATRE by N. Holbrook and A. Thomas 142 THE AMPHITHEATRE by N. Holbrook I45 Historical Background by L. Wheeler I45 The Excavations 147 Period 1 147 Period 2 157 Period 3 161 Period4 166 Period 5 169 Period 6 169 Discussion 171 THE SHOPS THE SHOPS IN INSULA 11 (THE POSSIBLE MACELLUM) by N. Ho1brook 177 Introduction 177 Period 1 177 Period 2 180 CONTENTS VII Period 3 Construction l8I Period 3 Occupation I83 Discussion I86 Other Discoveries in insula 11 I88 SHOPS V.I-V.5 IN INSULA V by N. Holbrook Introduction I89 Period I I89 Period 2 I93 Period 3 Construction 20I Periods 2/3 Occupation and Modification 203 Period 3a 205 Discussion '"209 W A TERMOOR HOUSE, W A TERMOOR ROAD: EXCAVATION 1992 by C. Parry 2II SHOPS IN THE WESTERN CORNER OF INSULA V by N. Holbrook 2I7 Period I: Military 2I7 Period 2: Deposits Pre-Dating the Construction of Stone Shop V.6 2I8 Period 3: Construction and Modification of Stone Shop V.6 2I8 The Rooms 22I Period 4: Late Occupation after the Demolition of Shop V.6 226 Shop V.7 ' 228 Discussion 230 SHOPS AND HOUSES IN INSULA VI by N. Holbrook and J. Timby Introduction > ~- 230 Period I . 232 Period 2 236 Period 3 240 Discussion 244 ,• THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EVIDENCE .·• THE COINS by R. Reece and P. Guest ,_247 The Excavated Coins Considered as Groups (RR~ 247 Discussion of the Distribution ofthe Coins in and around the Town (PG) 262 The Catalogue and its Use in the Future (RR) 268 The Hoards (RR) 29I THE FINDS EVIDENCE by L. Viner Introduction 294 Conservation 294 The Functional Categories 295 Objects of Military Equipment by J. Miles Paddock 305 Metal-Working in Roman Cirencester by J. Bayley 307 General Discussion 3,09 Catalogue of Illustrated Objects 313 THE SUPPLY OF POTTERY TO ROMAN CIRENCESTER by N. Cooper 324 Introduction 324 Problems and Approaches 324 Summary of Fabrics 325 Ceramic Phase I (c.45/50-75) 325 Ceramic Phase 2 {c.75-I00/120) 327 Ceramic Phase 3 {c.I00/120-160)" 329 Ceramic Phase 4 ( c.l50-1601170) 33I Ceramic Phase 5 (c.200-250) 332 Ceramic Phase 6 {c.250-300) 334 Ceramic Phase 7 (c.300-350) 336 Ceramic Phase 8 (c.350-400) .. 339 Summary of Pottery Supply c.45-400 34I Catalogue of Illustrated Vessels 34I V111 CIRENCESTER EXCAVATIONS V THE CERAMIC TILES by T. Darvill 351 ANIMAL BONES FROM ROMANO-BRITISH DEPOSITS G~ CIRENCESTER by M. Maltby 352 The Scope of This Report 352 Recording Methods 353 The Chester Street Sample 353 Species Representation 354 Conclusions 369 URBAN STRA TIGRAPHY AND ROMAN HISTORY by N. Faulkner Introduction: Writing Urban Histories 371 Methodological Problems: Validating the Sample 372 Methodological Problems: Dating the Deposits 373 Methodological Problems: Quantifying Data 374 Cirencester in the High Empire: The Rise of the Municipal Gentry 377 The Third Century Crisis and Decline of the Municipal Gentry 378 Cirencester in the Late Empire: The Rule of the Military-Bureaucratic Complex 379 AD 407-410: Armageddon 384 Appendix 1: Public Buildings Gazetteer 385 Appendix 2: Private Buildings Gazetteer 386 Bibliography 389 Index 399 .. LIST OF FIGURES Fig. I Location of the Cirencester excavations ,xiv Fig. 2 Key to conventions used in section drawings xvi Fig. 3 Pre-Roman and Roman watercourses in the Cirencester area 9 Fig. 4 Roman road system around Cirencester 12 Fig. 5 Plan of the defensive ditches ofthe Leaholme fort 18 Fig. 6 Plan of the Roman Town 20 Fig. 7 Key to the labelling of the streets 21 Fig. 8 Street E and later metalled area at Site BD (Gaumont Cinema) 24 Fig. 9 Metalled area and probable water-pipe wall at Site DB (Purley Road) 24 Fig. I 0 Section through Street D at Site BC (Chester Mews) 27 Fig. 11 Location of the trenches at Cricklade Street 1996 30 Fig. 12 Plan of Street L, Cricklade Street 1996 32 Fig. 13 Section through Street L, Cricklade Street 1996 33 Fig. 14 Location of excavations and observations of the town defences 36 Fig. 15 Plan ofthe Verulamium Gate (Site AA) 38 Fig. 16 Curving bridge abutment in Trench AAIV 39 Fig. 17 Verulamium Gate (Site AA), sections AB, HJ 40 Fig. 18 Verulamium Gate (Site AA), section CD 41 Fig. 19 Verulamium Gate (Site AA), section EG; North-east defences (Site AC), section AB facing p.40 Fig. 20 Town wall abutting the north-west tower of the Verulamium Gate 41 Fig. 21 Rebated block forming the base of a flood gate through the town wall in Trench AAX 42 Fig. 22 The Bath Gate and its environs (Site DX) 48 Fig. 23 Plan and sections of the Bath Gate (Site DX) 50 Fig. 24 The north-west tower of the Bath Gate and adjacent town wall 51 Fig. 25 Architectural fragments from the Bath Gate 52 Fig. 26 Comparative plan of the gates at Cirencester and Verulamium 53 Fig. 27 Section at City Bank (Site AQ) 54 Fig. 28 The town wall at City Bank (Site AQ) 55 Fig. 29 lnfilling of the town wall ditch at City Bank (Site AQ) 56 Fig.
Recommended publications
  • A Modern History of Britain's Roman Mosaic Pavements

    A Modern History of Britain's Roman Mosaic Pavements

    Spectacle and Display: A Modern History of Britain’s Roman Mosaic Pavements Michael Dawson Archaeopress Roman Archaeology 79 Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-831-2 ISBN 978-1-78969-832-9 (e-Pdf) © Michael Dawson and Archaeopress 2021 Front cover image: Mosaic art or craft? Reading Museum, wall hung mosaic floor from House 1, Insula XIV, Silchester, juxtaposed with pottery by the Aldermaston potter Alan Gaiger-Smith. Back cover image: Mosaic as spectacle. Verulamium Museum, 2007. The triclinium pavement, wall mounted and studio lit for effect, Insula II, Building 1 in Verulamium 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of figures.................................................................................................................................................iii Preface ............................................................................................................................................................v 1 Mosaics Make a Site ..................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1
  • GADARG - Essays 09/03/2009 10:47

    GADARG - Essays 09/03/2009 10:47

    GADARG - essays 09/03/2009 10:47 GLOUCESTER AND DISTRICT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP Registered charity No.252290 Contact us: ~ GLEVUM ~ The Roman origins of Gloucester by Nigel Spry In 1997 Gloucester celebrated its founding as a Colonia - the highest status to which any Roman settlement could aspire. To learn about this, let's start at the beginning - and then we can follow on with some later history. Kingsholm Some time after AD 49 the Roman army - we cannot be certain but probably the 20th legion or elements of it, from Colchester - built a fortress at Kingsholm near an Iron-Age settlement beside the then course of the Severn. There appears to have been two major phases of construction, the later one bringing the site to full legionary size. The use of the fortress and its continuity of occupation is uncertain, but its probable role was as a strategic base and support headquarters for campaigns in Wales. Because of flooding the location was an unsatisfactory one; this no doubt was one reason that around AD 66 it was abandoned and the army established a new fortress one km to the south, on an area of raised ground that would in due course become known as Gloucester, where there had been earlier occupation. A New Fortress The new fortress, rectangular in shape and covering an area of 17 hectares (43 acres), had turf faced and 'timber strapped' clay ramparts, 3.5m high, surmounted by a timber palisade and walkway, and fronted by wide steeply cut V-shaped ditches. Substantial timber gate towers pierced the rampart on each side and between them along the ramparts were other timber towers at intervals and at the rampart corners.
  • Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
  • Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire

    Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire

    Wessex Archaeology Coberley Villa Coberley, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref:Ref: 6531165311 DecemberDecember 20082008 Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of: Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY SP4 6EB Report reference: 65311.01 December 2008 Wessex Archaeology Limited 2008 Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No.287786 Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................1 1.2 Site Description ..........................................................................................1 1.3 Archaeological and Historical Background.............................................1 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................2 3 METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................2 3.1 Topographical Survey................................................................................2 3.2 Geophysical Survey....................................................................................3 3.3 Excavation and Recording ........................................................................3
  • Ethnicity and Iconography on Roman Cavalrymen Tombstones

    Ethnicity and Iconography on Roman Cavalrymen Tombstones

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2014-12-01 The Roman Riders: Ethnicity and Iconography on Roman Cavalrymen Tombstones Jessica Colleen Kramer Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Kramer, Jessica Colleen, "The Roman Riders: Ethnicity and Iconography on Roman Cavalrymen Tombstones" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 4343. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4343 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Roman Riders: Ethnicity and Iconography on Roman Cavalrymen Tombstones Jessica Colleen Kramer A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Cynthia Finlayson, Chair John E. Clark David Johnson Department of Anthropology Brigham Young University December 2014 Copyright © 2014 Jessica Colleen Kramer All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The Roman Riders: Ethnicity and Iconography on Roman Cavalryman Tombstones Jessica Colleen Kramer Department of Anthropology, BYU Master of Arts The funerary grave stelae of the Roman cavalrymen are large, impressive monuments set apart from their military counterparts by the ornate relief carvings which they exhibit. The two most common motifs featured on these tombstones are the rider relief motifs and the totenmahl motifs. Aspects of both the reliefs and the inscribed epitaphs are distinctly characteristic of the Roman military. Throughout the history of the Roman Empire, men in the auxiliary cavalry units were recruited from non-Roman allied tribes.
  • 8 Water and Decentring Urbanism in the Roman Period: Urban Materiality, Post-Humanism and Identity

    8 Water and Decentring Urbanism in the Roman Period: Urban Materiality, Post-Humanism and Identity

    Adam Rogers 8 Water and Decentring Urbanism in the Roman Period: Urban Materiality, Post-Humanism and Identity Abstract: In this chapter, the relationship between water and urbanism in the Roman period is examined by looking at the ways in which water formed part of the urban fabric and the implica- tions of this for understanding urban development, urban lives and identities, that decentres approaches to Roman urbanism. Water reminds us that the dualism of ‘natural’ and ‘human- made’ components of settlements and landscapes needs to be studied and brought together through meaningful frameworks of analysis. ‘Decentring’ urbanism draws on different perspec- tives of urbanism and allows us to move away from the top-down Romanocentric approach to urban studies and look for additional perspectives and experiences. The example of water al- lows us to explore urbanism by looking at landscape, religion and ritual, and identity and experience. The paper focuses on the towns of Britain in the Roman era, with case studies of Colchester (Camulodunum), St Albans (Verulamium), London (Londinium), Lincoln (Lindum) and Winchester (Venta Belgarum), and reflects on the way in which provinces across the Em- pire differed in the nature of urban development and urban experience. There was no one Roman world, but many different worlds in the Roman era where there were different identities and experiences. Introduction This paper examines water as a component of towns in the Roman period and how we can look at the implications of water forming part of the urban materiality. Water can be used to develop decentred perspectives on these settlements and the experiences of inhabitants.
  • Hawkins Jillian

    Hawkins Jillian

    UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES The significance of the place-name element *funta in the early middle ages. JILLIAN PATRICIA HAWKINS Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2011 UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The significance of the place-name element *funta in the early middle ages. Jillian Patricia Hawkins The Old English place-name element *funta derives from Late Latin fontāna, “spring”, and is found today in 21 place-names in England. It is one of a small group of such Latin-derived elements, which testify to a strand of linguistic continuity between Roman Britain and early Anglo- Saxon England. *funta has never previously been the subject of this type of detailed study. The continued use of the element indicates that it had a special significance in the interaction, during the fifth and sixth centuries, between speakers of British Latin and speakers of Old English, and this study sets out to assess this significance by examining the composition of each name and the area around each *funta site. Any combined element is always Old English. The distribution of the element is in the central part of the south- east lowland region of England. It does not occur in East Anglia, East Kent, west of Warwickshire or mid-Wiltshire or north of Peterborough. Seven of the places whose names contain the element occur singly, the remaining fourteen appearing to lie in groups. The areas where *funta names occur may also have other pre-English names close by.
  • Arbeia Journal

    Arbeia Journal

    THE ARBEIA JOURNAL VOLUME Ill 1994 THE ARBEIA SOCIETY MCMXCIV THE ARBEIA SOCIETY OFFICERS 1994 PRESIDENT P.T. Bidwell LLB MA FSA EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Chairman Treasurer LP. Stephenson BA P. Mullis BA, ACA Quinta Secretary General Secretary Ms A.T. Croom BA W.B. Griffiths BA NON-EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Publications Officer: M.C. Bishop BA PhD Publicity Officer: Mrs M.E. Snape BSc MLitt Lecture Meetings Secretary: Mrs E. Elliot BA ALA Authenticity Officer: J.C.N. Coulston BA MPhil PhD Young Archaelogy Club Co-ordinator: Ms C. Lloyd BA PGCE Editors- Arbeia Magazine: R.C. Oram BA ATD & Ms A.T. Croom BA The Arbeia Journal Editor: W.B. Griffiths BA Assistant Editor: N. Hodgson MA PhD Editorial Board: P.T. Bidwell, M.C. Bishop, Ms A.T. Croom All correspondence to the society should be addressed in the first instance to: The Secretary, Arbeia Society, Arbeia Roman Fort, Baring Street, South Shields,Tyne and Wear, N£33 288 THE ARBEIA JOURNAL SOCIETY VOLUME Ill ©The Individual Authors 1994 The Arbeia Society, Arbeia Roman Fort, Baring Street, South Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE33 2BB Produced for the Arbeia Society by M.C. Bishop Printed in England by Tyneside Free Press The Arbeia Society MCMXCIV Registered Charity No.1041609 CONTENTS Page Reconstructing Roman Slings W.B. Griffiths & P. Carrick 1 The Vicus of the Roman Fort at Wallsend, Tyne and Wear M.E. Snape & P.T. Bidwell 13 Washingwells Roman Fort- A Transcription of the Aerial Photographs and an Assessment of the Evidence N. Holbrook & S.C. Speak. With a contribution from G.
  • Then Arthur Fought the MATTER of BRITAIN 378 – 634 A.D

    Then Arthur Fought the MATTER of BRITAIN 378 – 634 A.D

    Then Arthur Fought THE MATTER OF BRITAIN 378 – 634 A.D. Howard M. Wiseman Then Arthur Fought is a possible history centred on a possi- bly historical figure: Arthur, battle-leader of the dark-age (5th- 6th century) Britons against the invading Anglo-Saxons. Writ- ten in the style of a medieval chronicle, its events span more than 250 years, and most of Western Europe, all the while re- specting known history. Drawing upon hundreds of ancient and medieval texts, Howard Wiseman mixes in his own inventions to forge a unique conception of Arthur and his times. Care- fully annotated, Then Arthur Fought will appeal to anyone in- terested in dark-age history and legends, or in new frameworks for Arthurian fiction. Its 430 pages include Dramatis Personae, genealogies, notes, bibliography, and 20 maps. —— Then Arthur Fought is an extraordinary achievement. ... An absorbing introduction to the history and legends of the period [and] ... a fascinating synthesis. — from the Foreword by Patrick McCormack, author of the Albion trilogy. —— A long and lavishly detailed fictional fantasia on the kind of primary source we will never have for the Age of Arthur. ... soaringly intelligent and, most unlikely of all, hugely entertaining. It is a stunning achievement, enthusiastically recommended. — Editor’s Choice review by Steve Donoghue, Indie Reviews Editor, Historical Novel Society. Contents List of Figures x Foreword, by Patrick McCormack xi Preface, by the author xv Introduction: history, literature, and this book xix Dramatis Personae xxxi Genealogies xxxix
  • 229 Le Premier Tome, Consacre a La Province De Belgique, Reprend

    229 Le Premier Tome, Consacre a La Province De Belgique, Reprend

    Besprechungen und Anzeigen 229 Le premier tome, consacre a la Province de Belgique, reprend quatre livraisons interes­ sant les villes d’Amiens, de Beauvais, de Grand et de Metz. Pour les tomes suivants, le critere de l’appartenance a une meme province a ete retenu pour le regroupement des monographies. La contribution sur la ville d’Amiens est signee par six collaborateurs auxquels s’est joint J. L. Massy, de la Direction des Antiquites de Picardie, qui est par ailleurs l’organisateur d’un colloque recent, tenu ä Saint-Riquier, sur les villes romaines de la Province de Belgique, dont le rapport est sous presse. De la Sorte, les nouvelles decouvertes ont ete utilement integrees a cette monographie. Retenons en particulier une bonne connaissance du quadril- lage urbain, heterogene dans sa conception et son evolution; Amiens aurait connu sous les Flaviens son extension maximale de 160 ha de superficie au moins; des le Ile siede, plusieurs insulae peripheriques sont abandonnees partiellement; au Bas-Empire, la surface emmuraillee n’est plus que d’une vingtaine d’hectares. La Bibliographie plus reduite concernant Beauvais temoigne de notre connaissance plus limitee sur cette agglomeration. Son perimetre urbain n’est connu avec precision que pour le Bas-Empire, gräce a l’enceinte enfermant 10 ha de superficie. Les elements d’urbanisme et les monuments ont ete peu etudies. Les structures urbaines et l’enceinte de Grand de 18 ha ne nous sont pas mieux revelees. Metz antique, en revanche, offre un perimetre et un quadrillage urbain mieux apprehen- des. On connait bien aussi certains edifices et le trace de l’enceinte du Bas-Empire.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, 1957-58. II. THE HUMAN HEAD IN INSULAR PAGAN CELTIC RELIGION. BY ANNE BOSS, PH.D., F.S.A.ScoT. INTRODUCTION. A Scottish Tricephalos said to come from Sutherland. Throug generosite hth Trusteee th Dice f yo th f kso Institute , Kilmarnock, importann a t carved hea kina t hithertf do dno o recorded from Scotlans dha been addeNationae th o dt lonlr Museum.fo g d beeha nt I exhibite1 e th n di Institute's museu earln a onle s mya th yfontd recor s provenancan , it f do e is '' Sutherlandshire.'' This head, 4-7 ins. high and 5-4 by 5 ins. broad, is shaped like a ball, truncated top and bottom. The top is hollowed into a conical cup about 3 ins. across and 2-6 ins. deep. The base is slightly concave. Three faces have been carved roun e sidesdth . Rounded incisions about J—. widin J e d abou an deptn i t. h^in outline three pair f eyeso s , chin droopingd san , triangular moustaches, whil lina e e continuous roun e stondth e indicates mouthse th . Broader lines -were use indicato dt innee eth r curvee th f o s cheeks and the sides of the drop-shaped noses. Between the faces there are similarly incised crosses, equal-armed, abou ins2 t . overall excep r onefo t , now damaged, abou. higin h1 t wit verha y uncertain horizontal strokt eno more than \ in. long. The ston granites ei , speckled black, whit pinkd ean . Mis . MacDonalsH d of the Geological Survey and Museum, South Kensington, has kindly examined it.
  • The Britons in Late Antiquity: Power, Identity And

    The Britons in Late Antiquity: Power, Identity And

    THE BRITONS IN LATE ANTIQUITY: POWER, IDENTITY AND ETHNICITY EDWIN R. HUSTWIT Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bangor University 2014 Summary This study focuses on the creation of both British ethnic or ‘national’ identity and Brittonic regional/dynastic identities in the Roman and early medieval periods. It is divided into two interrelated sections which deal with a broad range of textual and archaeological evidence. Its starting point is an examination of Roman views of the inhabitants of the island of Britain and how ethnographic images were created in order to define the population of Britain as 1 barbarians who required the civilising influence of imperial conquest. The discussion here seeks to elucidate, as far as possible, the extent to which the Britons were incorporated into the provincial framework and subsequently ordered and defined themselves as an imperial people. This first section culminates with discussion of Gildas’s De Excidio Britanniae. It seeks to illuminate how Gildas attempted to create a new identity for his contemporaries which, though to a certain extent based on the foundations of Roman-period Britishness, situated his gens uniquely amongst the peoples of late antique Europe as God’s familia. The second section of the thesis examines the creation of regional and dynastic identities and the emergence of kingship amongst the Britons in the late and immediately post-Roman periods. It is largely concerned to show how interaction with the Roman state played a key role in the creation of early kingships in northern and western Britain. The argument stresses that while there were claims of continuity in group identities in the late antique period, the socio-political units which emerged in the fifth and sixth centuries were new entities.