DOCSLIB.ORG

Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Wessex Archaeology Coberley Villa Coberley, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref:Ref: 6531165311 DecemberDecember 20082008 Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of: Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY SP4 6EB Report reference: 65311.01 December 2008 Wessex Archaeology Limited 2008 Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No.287786 Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................1 1.2 Site Description ..........................................................................................1 1.3 Archaeological and Historical Background.............................................1 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................2 3 METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................2 3.1 Topographical Survey................................................................................2 3.2 Geophysical Survey....................................................................................3 3.3 Excavation and Recording ........................................................................3 4 RESULTS.............................................................................................................4 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................4 4.2 Geophysical Survey....................................................................................4 4.3 Archaeological Evaluation ........................................................................4 Trench 1 (Figures 4 & 5).............................................................................4 Trench 2 (Figure 6) .....................................................................................5 Trench 3 (Figure 7) .....................................................................................7 Trench 4 (Figure 8) .....................................................................................7 Trench 5 (Figure 9) .....................................................................................7 Trench 6 (Figure 10) ...................................................................................8 Trench 7 (Figure 11) ...................................................................................9 Trench 8 (Figure 12) ...................................................................................9 Trench 9 (Figure 13) .................................................................................10 Trench 10 (Figure 13) ...............................................................................10 Trench 11 (Figure 13) ...............................................................................10 5 FINDS .................................................................................................................10 5.1 Introduction..............................................................................................10 5.2 Pottery.......................................................................................................11 5.3 Ceramic Building Material (CBM) ........................................................12 5.4 Wall Plaster and Opus Signinum ...........................................................13 5.5 Stone ..........................................................................................................13 5.6 Coins..........................................................................................................13 5.7 Metalwork.................................................................................................15 5.8 Animal Bone .............................................................................................15 5.9 Other Finds...............................................................................................15 6 PALAEOENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE..................................................16 6.1 Introduction..............................................................................................16 6.2 Charred Plant Remains and Charcoal...................................................16 6.3 Land Molluscs ..........................................................................................16 6.4 Summary...................................................................................................17 6.5 Potential ....................................................................................................17 7 DISCUSSION.....................................................................................................17 8 ARCHIVE ..........................................................................................................19 9 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................20 i Appendix 1: Trench Summaries Figures Figure 1: Site location plan Figure 2: Topographic survey results Figure 3: Magnetometry survey and resistance survey results Figure 4: Trench 1 Figure 5: Trench 1 photographs Plate 1: Mosaic, north-west panel Plate 2: Overall aerial view of mosaic Plate 3: Mosaic, eastern panel Plate 4: Mosaic, southern panel Figure 6: Trench 2 Plate 5: View of wall 220, from the west Figure 7: Trench 3 Plate 6: Wall 307 and robber trenches 308 and 310 Plate 7: Ditch 303, west-facing section Figure 8: Trench 4 Plate 8: Ditch 402, south-facing section Figure 9: Trench 5 Plate 9: Kiln 506 from the south Plate 10: Kiln flue from the west Figure 10: Trench 6 Plate 11: Ditch 602, north-facing section Figure 11: Trench 7 Figure 12: Trench 8 Figure 13: Trenches 9, 10 and 11 Plate 12: Trench 9, east-facing section Plate 13: Trench 10, from the south Plate 14: Trench 11, from the south Front cover: Detail of mosaic in Trench 1 Back cover: Trench 1 under excavation Tables Table 1: Finds totals by material type and by trench Table 2: Pottery totals by ware type Table 3: CBM totals by type Table 4: Assessment of the charred plant remains and charcoal ii Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Summary Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Videotext Communications Ltd to carry out archaeological recording and post-excavation analysis on an evaluation at Coberley Villa in Gloucestershire (centred on NGR 396750 215200) as part of the ‘Time Team’ television series. Eleven trenches were excavated to investigate the extent, character and condition of the Coberley villa remains. The trenches targeted a mosaic pavement discovered by metal detectorists in 2003 and structural remains indicated by geophysical surveying to exist in the vicinity of the mosaic. The remains of a demolished villa were recorded which appeared to have been H- shaped in plan. The evidence suggests that the north and south wings were possibly later additions to an original structure. The mosaic pavement appeared to be within a triclinium. The central panel had been removed, possibly evidence of Christian iconoclastic destruction. Dating evidence from the Site suggests that the villa was constructed in the 2nd century AD; the mosaic is dated on stylistic grounds to the late 2nd to early 3rd century. There is no firm evidence for the abandonment of the villa, but the presence of a little 4th century pottery, and several mid to late 4th century coins, indicates use of the Site well into the late Roman period, although all this evidence comes from post- demolition contexts. Geophysics also located evidence of industrial activity on the Site. One of the geophysical anomalies was excavated and transpired to be a partly demolished kiln, the stone-built, subterranean element of which was still preserved in situ. The kiln was probably producing roof tile for the villa construction. iii Coberley Villa, Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Acknowledgements This programme of post-excavation and assessment work was commissioned and funded by Videotext Communications Ltd, and Wessex Archaeology would like to thank the staff at Videotext, and in particular Michael Douglas (Series Editor), Melinda Corkery (Production Manager), Jim Mower (Assistant Producer), Jon Willers (Researcher) and Jenny James (Production Coordinator) for their considerable help during the recording and post-excavation work. The excavation strategy was conducted by Neil Holbrook and undertaken by Time Team’s retained archaeologists, Phil Harding (Wessex Archaeology), Brigid Gallagher, Ian Powlesland, Matt Williams, Raksha Dave and Tracy Smith, assisted by Paul Nichols, Richard Macpherson Barrett, Ed Stratford, Briege Williams and Nick Witchel of Gloucestershire County Council Archaeology Service. They were aided by local metal detectorists David Hutton and Don Sherratt. The geophysical survey was undertaken by John Gater, Fiona Chester and Mark Harrison of GSB Prospection Ltd. The field survey was undertaken by Henry Chapman (University of Birmingham). The excavation strategy was devised by Neil Holbrook (Cotswold Archeology). The on-site recording was co-ordinated by Jon Milward, and on-site finds processing was carried out by Laura
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PREFACE in 1974 Enid and I Decided to Look for a House of Our Own As I
    PREFACE In 1974 Enid and I decided to look for a house of our own as I was due to retire in 1976. Gloucestershire we knew was a nice county in which to live. We had certain connections with it. On our days off we frequently toured the Cotswolds, we were then living in Henley-on-Thames. Added to this, in about 1910 my father considered buying the practice at Northleach and so becoming its local doctor, however, he went to Weobley in Herefordshire. His father, James Strachan Clarke who died in 1976 aged 45 or 46 had been a tenant farmer at Ashwick Grange, Marshfield and apparently the Land Agent of the people living at Ashwick Hall. Unfortunately, the records of ownership of the Hall were destroyed in the Bristol blitz during World War II so I know nothing about them. In the parish church there is a brass plate concerning him. The name is incorrect, he is called James Stephenson Clarke, this was an error on the part of my Aunt Agnes, his eldest daughter. In 1775 a certain John Clarke married Jane Stephenson, she is alleged to be the beauty of the Clarkes (though I would think, judging from the pictures, that my wife Enid, runs her a close second and is probably ahead of her). The name Stephenson became attached to the Clarkes until the present day. After a long search we saw a photograph of our cottage in the premises of Bloss, Tippett and Taylor of Bourton-on-the-Water and in 1976 bought it from Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy In
    The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire March 2019 the gloucestershire agrifood and rural economy final report.docx March 2019 The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 Gloucestershire’s Agriculture and Food Sector .......................................................................... 6 UK & Global Context .............................................................................................................. 6 The Scale of Gloucestershire Agriculture and pre Consumer Food Chain .............................. 8 The Consumer End of the Gloucestershire Food Chain .........................................................15 Non Farming Enterprises and diversification..........................................................................16 Major Companies in the Gloucestershire Agricultural, Food & Drink Sector ...........................18 The ‘End to End’ Food Chain .................................................................................................19 Gloucestershire’s Rural Economy .............................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Research Framework Revised.Vp
    Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England edited by Maria Medlycott East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper No.24, 2011 ALGAO East of England EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24 Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsi- bility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East). Cover illustration: The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfl Releases Tight Ends and Offensive Linemen to Be Named Finalists for the ‘Nfl 100 All-Time Team’
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Alex Riethmiller – 310.840.4635 NFL – 12/9/19 [email protected] NFL RELEASES TIGHT ENDS AND OFFENSIVE LINEMEN TO BE NAMED FINALISTS FOR THE ‘NFL 100 ALL-TIME TEAM’ 18 Offensive Linemen and 5 Tight Ends to be Named to All-Time Team Episode 4 of ‘NFL 100 All-Time Team’ Airs on Friday, December 13 at 8:00 PM ET on NFL Network Following the reveal of the defensive back and specialist All-Time Team class last week, the NFL is proud to announce the 40 offensive linemen (16 offensive tackles; 15 guards; 9 centers) and 12 tight ends that are finalists for the NFL 100 All-Time Team. 39 of the 40 offensive linemen finalists have been enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The 12 finalists at tight end include eight Pro Football Hall of Famers and combine for 711 career receiving touchdowns. Episode three will also reveal four head coaches to make the NFL 100 All-Time Team. The NFL100 All-Time Team airs every Friday at 8:00 PM ET through Week 17 of the regular season. Rich Eisen, Cris Collinsworth and Bill Belichick reveal selections by position each week, followed by a live reaction show hosted by Chris Rose immediately afterward, exclusively on NFL Network. From this group of finalists, the 26-person blue-ribbon voting panel ultimately selected seven offensive tackles, seven guards, four centers and five tight ends to the All-Time Team. The NFL 100 All-Time Team finalists at the offensive tackle position are: Player Years Played Team(s) Bob “The Boomer” Brown 1964-1968; 1969-1970; 1971- Philadelphia Eagles; Los Angeles 1973 Rams; Oakland Raiders Roosevelt Brown 1953-1965 New York Giants Lou Creekmur 1950-1959 Detroit Lions Dan Dierdorf 1971-1983 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Origins of Great Easton, Leicestershire: Commumity Archaeology Meets the ‘Big Dig’
    INVESTIGATING THE ORIGINS OF GREAT EASTON, LEICESTERSHIRE: COMMUMITY ARCHAEOLOGY MEETS THE ‘BIG DIG’. Nicholas J. Cooper and Vicki Score On Sunday June 22nd 2003, the inhabitants of Great Easton in the Welland Valley, in southeast Leicestershire, together with professional archaeologists from the University of Leicester and Channel 4’s Time Team, undertook a one-day field work investigation to try to establish the origins of their village and to chart its subsequent development. In conjunction with geophysical survey, a total of 41 metre-square test pits and two machine-excavated trenches were opened up across the village and dug to a maximum depth of 0.6m or until archaeology or natural was encountered (Fig. 1). Pits 14, 23, 35 & 44 were not excavated. Although most of the archaeological features recorded were modern (with the notable exceptions of a late Roman or Early Anglo-Saxon cobbled surface from Test Pit 3 and medieval plot boundaries in Trench 40) the artefactual material from the investigation has added considerably to the existing body of knowledge gathered by the Great Easton Fieldwork Group (Burningham and Wallis 2004, Fig. 1) over the last 20 years. This, along with more recent developer-funded opportunities, allows us to trace this focus of settlement back to the Roman period or later Iron Age (Fig. 2). Analysis of the pottery assemblage and its distribution has confirmed and complemented the findings of earlier work, which suggested the existence of a Roman period settlement (probably with an Iron Age antecedent), in the north- eastern part of the village, on higher ground around the church and immediately to the north in Lount’s Crescent.
    [Show full text]
  • How Important Was Basing House?
    How important was Basing House? A short introductory activity exploring the events and people of Basing House, Basingstoke, from its Tudor heyday in 1601 to its destruction in the Civil War in 1645. Duration: 30 minutes National Curriculum links KS2 History A local history study o A study over time tracing how several aspects of national history are reflected in the locality (this can go beyond 1066) o A study of an aspect of history or a site dating from a period beyond 1066 that is significant in the locality A study of an aspect or theme in British history that extends pupils’ chronological knowledge beyond 1066 o The changing power of monarchs o A significant turning point in British history Cross-curricular links KS2 English o Spoken language o Reading KS2 Geography o Locational knowledge o Human and physical geography Learning context Prior learning: none required. Learning objectives To learn what the local site of Basing House was like in its Tudor heyday (1601) To learn how the inhabitants of Basing House lived in 1601, and what happened to them in 1645. Learning outcomes All: will be able to investigate a primary and a secondary source to understand that Basing House is a local site at which there was a large, wealthy palace which is now in ruins. Most: will be able to construct a simple chronology of Basing House, drawing contrasts between its Tudor heyday and later destruction; understand that Basing House was an important and wealthy household. Some: will be able to critically interrogate and connect all sources to evaluate the importance of Basing House at two different time periods.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VIKINGS in ORKNEY James Graham-Campbell
    THE VIKINGS IN ORKNEY James Graham-Campbell Introduction In recent years, it has been suggested that the first permanent Scandinavian presence in Orkney was not the result of forcible land-taking by Vikings, but came about instead through gradual penetration - a period which has been described as one of'informal' settlement (Morris 1985: 213; 1998: 83). Such would have involved a phase of co-existence, or even integration, between the native Picts and the earliest Norse settlers. This initial period, it is supposed, was then followed by 'a second, formal, settlement associated with the estab­ lishment of an earldom' (Morris 1998: 83 ), in the late 9'h century. The archaeological evidence advanced in support of the first 'period of overlap' is, however, open to alternative interpretation and, indeed, Alfred Smyth has com­ mented ( 1984: 145), in relation to the annalistic records of the earliest Viking attacks on Ireland, that these 'strongly suggest that the Norwegians did not gradually infiltrate the Northern Isles as farmers and fisherman and then sud­ denly tum nasty against their neighbours'. Others have supposed that the first phase of Norse settlement in Orkney would have involved, in the words of Buteux (1997: 263): 'ness-taking' (the fortifying of a headland by means of a cross-dyke) and the occupation of small off-shore islands. Crawford ( 1987: 46) argues that headland dykes on Orkney can be interpreted as indicating ness-taking. However many are equally likely to be prehistoric land boundaries, and no bases on either headlands or small islands have yet been positively identified. Buteux continues his discussion by observing, most pertinently, that: While this can not be taken as suggesting that such sites do not remain to be uncovered, the striking fact is that almost all identified Viking-period settlements in the Northern Isles are found overlying or immediately adjacent to sites which were occupied in the preceding Pictish period and which, furthermore, had frequently been settlements of some size and importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey
    Wessex Archaeology Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey. Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref: 59472.01 March 2006 Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 59472.01 March 2006 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2006, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Contents Summary Acknowledgements 1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................5 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................5 1.2 Description of the Site................................................................................5 1.3 Historical Background...............................................................................5 1.4 Previous Archaeological Work ...............................................................12 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES...............................................................................13 3 METHODS.........................................................................................................14 3.1 Introduction..............................................................................................14 3.2 Dendrochronological Survey...................................................................14 3.3 Geophysical Survey..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw
    Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw Mick Aston’s passion for involving people in archaeology is reflected in the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund. His determination to make archaeology publicly accessible was realised through his teaching, work on Time Team, and advocating community projects. The Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is therefore intended to encourage voluntary effort in making original contributions to the study and care of the historic environment. Please note that the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is currently open to applicants carrying out work in England and Wales only. Historic Scotland run a similar scheme for projects in Scotland and details can be found at: http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/index/heritage/grants/grants-voluntary-sector- funding.htm. How does the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund work? Voluntary groups and societies, but also individuals, are challenged to put forward proposals for innovative projects that will say something new about the history and archaeology of local surroundings, and thus inform their future care. Proposals will be judged by a panel on their intrinsic quality, and evidence of capacity to see them through successfully. What is the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund panel looking for? First and foremost, the panel is looking for original research. Awards can be to support new work, or to support the completion of research already in progress, for example by paying for a specific piece of analysis or equipment. Projects which work with young people or encourage their participation are especially encouraged. What can funding be used for? In principle, almost anything that is directly related to the actual undertaking of a project.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Archaeological Evaluation at Syndale Park, Ospringe, Kent
    Zinch House, Station Road, Stogumber, Somerset Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of the Results OS 1840 Tithe map showing Zinch House Ref: 52568.14 Wessex Archaeology October 2003 ZINCH HOUSE, STATION ROAD, STOGUMBER, TAUNTON, SOMERSET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Document Ref. 52568.14 Prepared for: Wildfire Television Limited 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON W12 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB October 2003 © Copyright The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2003, all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited, Registered Charity No. 287786 ZINCH HOUSE, STATION ROAD, STOGUMBER, TAUNTON, SOMERSET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Contents Summary .......................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................5 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................6 1.1 The Site............................................................................................6 1.2 Previous Archaeological Work ........................................................6 2 METHODS .....................................................................................7 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................7 2.2 Aims and Objectives ........................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 CAG Library Index
    Ref Book Name Author B020 (Shire) ANCIENT AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS Sian Rees B015 (Shire) ANCIENT BOATS Sean McGrail B017 (Shire) ANCIENT FARMING Peter J.Reynolds B009 (Shire) ANGLO-SAXON POTTERY D.H.Kenneth B198 (Shire) ANGLO-SAXON SCULPTURE James Lang B011 (Shire) ANIMAL REMAINS IN ARCHAEOLOGY Rosemary Margaret Luff B010 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF GARDENS Christopher Taylor B268 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF GARDENS Christopher Taylor B039 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Peter Harrington B276 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Peter Harrington B240 (Shire) AVIATION ARCHAEOLOGY IN BRITAIN Guy de la Bedoyere B014 (Shire) BARROWS IN ENGLAND AND WALES L.V.Grinsell B250 (Shire) BELLFOUNDING Trevor S Jennings B030 (Shire) BOUDICAN REVOLT AGAINST ROME Paul R. Sealey B214 (Shire) BREWING AND BREWERIES Maurice Lovett B003 (Shire) BRICKS & BRICKMAKING M.Hammond B241 (Shire) BROCHS OF SCOTLAND J.N.G. Ritchie B026 (Shire) BRONZE AGE COPPER MINING William O'Brian B245 (Shire) BRONZE AGE COPPER MINING IN BRITAIN AND William O'Brien B230 (Shire) CAVE ART Andrew J. Lawson B035 (Shire) CELTIC COINAGE Philip de Jersey B032 (Shire) CELTIC CROSSES OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND Malcolm Seaborne B205 (Shire) CELTIC WARRIORS W.F. & J.N.G.Ritchie B006 (Shire) CHURCH FONTS Norman Pounds B243 (Shire) CHURCH MEMORIAL BRASSES AND BRASS Leigh Chapman B024 (Shire) CLAY AND COB BUILDINGS John McCann B002 (Shire) CLAY TOBACCO PIPES E.G.Agto B257 (Shire) COMPUTER ARCHAEOLOGY Gary Lock and John Wilcock B007 (Shire) DECORATIVE LEADWORK P.M.Sutton-Goold B029 (Shire) DESERTED VILLAGES Trevor Rowley and John Wood B238 (Shire) DESERTED VILLAGES Trevor Rowley and John Wood B270 (Shire) DRY STONE WALLS Lawrence Garner B018 (Shire) EARLY MEDIEVAL TOWNS IN BRITAIN Jeremy Haslam B244 (Shire) EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS AND MASTABA TOMBS Philip Watson B027 (Shire) FENGATE Francis Pryor B204 (Shire) GODS OF ROMAN BRITAIN Miranda J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Field Evaluations East Midlands LINCOLNSHIRE Boston 2/55 (C.32.O043) TF 33974383 PE21 0EE FORBES ROAD CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH Forbes Road Congregational Church, Boston, Lincolnshire Rylatt, J Lincoln : Pre-Construct Archaeology Ltd., 2003, 22pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Pre-Construct Archaeology Ltd. Trial trenches were excavated at the site. No features were encountered but medieval and post- medieval finds were recovered. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/56 (C.32.O048) TF 32764341 PE21 8TJ LAND AT 138-142 HIGH STREET, BOSTON Archaeological Evaluation on Land at 138-142 High Street, Boston, Lincolnshire Snee, J Sleaford : Archaeological Project Services, 2003, 54pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeological Project Services Trial trenches were excavated on the site. River bank deposits dating from the medieval period to the 17th century were identified. The land was reclaimed in the 18th century and dumping deposits were identified for this period. Cellars and building structures were identified dating to the 19th century. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 2/57 (C.32.O003) TF 40905009 PE22 9LE LAND AT HADWICK MOTORS, CHURCH ROAD, OLD LEAKE Land at Hardwick Motors, Church Road, Old Leake, Lincolnshire Hall, R Sleaford : Archaeological Project Services, 2003, 26pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Pre-Construct Archaeology Ltd. Evaluation trenches were excavated on the site. Two undated ditches, an infilled dyke and a post- medieval pit were identified. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM, UD 2/58 (C.32.O040) TF 42395087 PE22 9AQ LAND AT THE ANGEL INN Land at The Angel Inn, Church End, Wrangle, Lincolnshire Bradley-Lovekin, T Sleaford : Archaeological Project Services, 2003, 32pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeological Project Services Two trial trenches were excavated at the site.
    [Show full text]