Bugs Bottle up Scotch Broom Page 1 of 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biology and Biological Control of Common Gorse and Scotch Broom
United States Department of Agriculture BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF COMMON GORSE AND SCOTCH BROOM Forest Forest Health Technology FHTET-2017-01 Service Enterprise Team September 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. This publication is available online at: http://bugwoodcloud.org/resource/pdf/commongorse.pdf How to cite this publication: Andreas, J.E., R.L. Winston, E.M. Coombs, T.W. Miller, M.J. Pitcairn, C.B. Randall, S. Turner, and W. Williams. 2017. Biology and Biological Control of Scotch Broom and Gorse. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2017-01. Cover Photo Credits Top: Common gorse (Forest and Kim Starr, Starr Environmental, bugwood.org). Left of common gorse, top to bottom: Agonopterix umbellana (Janet Graham); Exapion ulicis (Janet Graham); Sericothrips staphylinus (Fritzi Grevstad, Oregon State University); Tetranychus lintearius (Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, bugwood.org). Bottom: Scotch broom (����������������������������������������������Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, bugwood.org). Right of Scotch broom, ��������������top to bottom: Bruchidius villosus (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension); Exapion fuscirostre (Laura Parsons, University of Idaho, bugwood.org); Leucoptera spartifoliella (Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, bugwood.org). References to pesticides appear in this publication. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or CAUTION: PESTICIDES recommendation of them by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. -
Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4. -
125. NEMONYCHIDAE Bedel 1882
692 · Family 125. Nemonychidae Superfamily CURCULIONOIDEA 125. NEMONYCHIDAE Bedel 1882 by Robert S. Anderson Family common name: The pine flower snout beetles mong the weevils, these rarely collected beetles are easily recognized by their straight antennae, and elongate rostrum combined with the presence of a distinct labrum. Adults are found in association with the male pollen- Abearing flowers of Pinus species. Description (based on ing four pairs of setae. Antenna of a single membranous article Lawrence 1982). Shape elon- bearing an accessory appendage. Mandible with two apical teeth, gate, slightly convex; length an obtuse protuberance on cutting edge, a distinctly produced 3.0-5.5 mm; color pale brown molar area with a flattened grinding surface, and one pair of setae. to black; vestiture of fine short Hypopharyngeal bracon present. Maxillary palp with three ar- to moderately long appressed ticles, palpiger present or absent. Labial palp of two articles. or suberect pubescence. Ros- Premental sclerite present, may be divided medially. Thorax with trum moderately to very long pronotal sclerite transverse, lightly pigmented or unpigmented, and mostly narrow. Antennae sparsely covered with setae. Legs very small, subconical, of two or straight, ending in a weak, three segments, with or without a terminal claw. Abdomen with loose club of three articles; an- first eight segments with two dorsal folds and bearing annular or tennal insertions lateral at the bicameral spiracles. Anal opening terminal. middle or near the apex of the Pupae are undescribed. rostrum. Labrum distinct, not Habits and habitats. These beetles are rarely collected, likely fused with clypeus. Mandibles because of their specialized habits and life history. -
Die Rüsselkäfer (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) Der Schweiz – Checkliste Mit Verbreitungsangaben Nach Biogeografischen Regionen
MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 83: 41–118, 2010 Die Rüsselkäfer (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) der Schweiz – Checkliste mit Verbreitungsangaben nach biogeografischen Regionen CHRISTOPH GERMANN Natur-Museum Luzern, Kasernenplatz 6, 6003 Luzern und Naturhistorisches Museum der Burger ge - meinde Bern, Bernastrasse 15, 3006 Bern; Email: [email protected] The weevils of Switzerland – Checklist (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea), with distribution data by bio - geo graphic regions. – A checklist of the Swiss weevils (Curculionoidea) including distributional pat- terns based on 6 bio-geographical regions is presented. Altogether, the 1060 species and subspecies out of the 10 families are composed of 21 Anthribidae, 129 Apionidae, 3 Attelabidae, 847 Cur cu lio - ni dae, 7 Dryophthoridae, 9 Erirhinidae, 13 Nanophyidae, 3 Nemonychidae, 3 Raymondionymidae, and 25 Rhynchitidae. Further, 13 synanthropic, 42 introduced species as well as 127 species, solely known based on old records, are given. For all species their synonymous names used in Swiss litera- ture are provided. 151 species classified as doubtful for the Swiss fauna are listed separately. Keywords: Curculionoidea, Checklist, Switzerland, faunistics, distribution EINLEITUNG Rüsselkäfer im weiteren Sinn (Curculionoidea) stellen mit über 62.000 bisher beschriebenen Arten und gut weiteren 150.000 zu erwartenden Arten (Oberprieler et al. 2007) die artenreichste Käferfamilie weltweit dar. Die ungeheure Vielfalt an Arten, Farben und Formen oder verschiedenartigsten Lebensweisen und damit ein - her gehenden Anpassungen fasziniert immer wieder aufs Neue. Eine auffällige Gemein samkeit aller Rüsselkäfer ist der verlängerte Kopf, welcher als «Rostrum» (Rüssel) bezeichnet wird. Rüsselkäfer sind als Phyto phage stets auf ihre Wirts- pflanzen angewiesen und folgen diesen bei uns von Unter wasser-Biotopen im pla- naren Bereich (u.a. -
Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration
Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Horticulture University of Washington 2013 Committee: Linda Chalker-Scott Kern Ewing Sarah Reichard Joshua Chenoweth Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin Master of Environmental Horticulture candidate School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington, Seattle September 3, 2013 Contents Figures ................................................................................................................................................................. ii Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bromus tectorum L. (BROTEC) ..................................................................................................................... 19 Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (CIRARV) -
A Global View of the Future for Biological Control of Gorse, Ulex Europaeus L
A global view of the future for biological control of gorse, Ulex europaeus L. R.L. Hill,1 J. Ireson,2 A.W. Sheppard,3 A.H. Gourlay,4 H. Norambuena,5 G.P. Markin,6 R. Kwong7 and E.M. Coombs8 Summary Gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) has become naturalized in at least 50 countries outside its native range, from the high elevation tropics to the subantarctic islands and Scandinavia. Its habit, adaptability and ability to colonize disturbed ground makes it one of the world’s most invasive temperate weeds. It is 80 years since New Zealand first initiated research into biological control for gorse. This paper briefly reviews the progress made worldwide since then, and examines future opportunities for biological control of this weed. The range of available agents is now known, and this list is critically assessed. Ten organisms have been released variously in six countries and islands and their performance is reviewed. In most cases, agent populations have been regulated either from ‘top-down’ or ‘bottom- up’, and there is no evidence anywhere of consistent outbreaks that could cause significant reduc- tion in existing gorse populations in the medium term. Habitat disturbance and seedling competition are important drivers of gorse population dynamics. Existing agents may yet have long-term impact through sublethal effects on maximum plant age, another key factor in gorse population dynamics. Along with habitat manipulation, seed-feeding insects may yet play a long-term role in reducing seed banks below critical levels for replacement in some populations. In the short term, progress will rely on rational and integrated weed management practices, exploiting biological control where possible. -
Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control ASSESSING HOST RANGES FOR PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS USED FOR CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE R. G. Van Driesche, T. Murray, and R. Reardon (Eds.) Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2004-03 Department of Service September 2004 Agriculture he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photo: Syngaster lepidus Brullè—Timothy Paine, University of California, Riverside. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S. -
Nemonychidae, Belidae, Brentidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionoidea)
INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF L ANDCARE RESEARCH Dr O. R. W. Sutherland Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF U NIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF O VERSEAS I NSTITUTIONS Dr M. J. Fletcher Director of the Collections NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 45 Nemonychidae, Belidae, Brentidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) G. Kuschel 7 Tropicana Drive, Mt Roskill, Auckland 1004, New Zealand [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a PRESS Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2003 4 Kuschel (2003): Nemonychidae, Belidae, Brentidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2003 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication KUSCHEL, G.. Nemonychidae, Belidae, Brentidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) / G. Kuschel – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. -
Apionidae, Curculionoidea)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 260: 49–59 (2013)A description of preimaginal stages of Pseudaspidapion botanicum... 49 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.260.4450 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A description of preimaginal stages of Pseudaspidapion botanicum Alonso-Zarazaga & Wang, 2011 (Apionidae, Curculionoidea) Zhiliang Wang1, M. A. Alonso-Zarazaga1,2, Dakang Zhou3, Runzhi Zhang1 1 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IZCAS), Beijing, China 2 Depto. de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, E-28006Madrid, Spain 3 Beijing Botanical Garden, (BBG), Beijing, China Corresponding author: Runzhi Zhang ([email protected]) Academic editor: T. Erwin | Received 5 December 2012 | Accepted 11 January 2013 | Published 21 January 2013 Citation: Zhiliang Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Zhou D, Zhang R (2013) A description of preimaginal stages of Pseudaspidapion botanicum Alonso-Zarazaga & Wang, 2011 (Apionidae, Curculionoidea). ZooKeys 260: 49–59. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.260.4450 Abstract The preimaginal stages including egg, mature larva and pupa of Pseudaspidapion botanicum Alonso- Zarazaga & Wang, 2011 were described and figured, diagnostic characters of larva and pupa were dis- cussed, and corresponding biological information was supplied. The nomenclature of frontal setae in the larva compared with curculionid weevils, the absence of the hypopharyngeal bracon in the larva, and the metafemoral setae in the pupa were discussed. Common and different characters among the larvae of P. botanicum, Aspidapion radiolus (Marsham, 1802) and A. aeneum (Fabricius, 1775) were also provided. Keywords Apionidae, Pseudaspidapion botanicum, larva, pupa, morphology, biology Introduction Pseudaspidapion botanicum Alonso-Zarazaga & Wang, 2011 belongs to the tribe As- pidapiini Alonso-Zarazaga, 1990. -
Infestation of Gorse Pods by Cydia Ulicetana and Exapion Ulicis in The
Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.21(1) 2006 39 pods damaged by the two seed feeders, C. ulicetana and E. ulicis, when both were Infestation of gorse pods by Cydia ulicetana and active. Exapion ulicis in the South Island of New Zealand Materials and methods Sample collection Craig R. SixtusA, R. Roderic ScottA and George D. HillB A Sites were chosen at Bainham, Onekaka, Bio-Protection and Ecology Division, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, East Takaka, (collectively later referred to New Zealand. as Golden Bay sites), Hinewai, McLeans B Agriculture and Life Sciences Division, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Island, Trotters Gorge and Lake Ohau New Zealand. (Figure 1). Fifteen gorse bushes were chosen randomly at each site. The start- ing point was selected without conscious Summary especially where there is abundant au- bias and successive bushes were those at The effectiveness of Cydia ulicetana tumn fl owering (Hill et al. 1991). the distance given by a random number (Haworth) (gorse pod moth) and Exa- To improve control of gorse seed pro- (in metres), from the previous bush in a pion ulicis (Förster) (gorse seed weevil) duction, Cydia ulicetana (Haworth) (previ- straight line. at reducing annual production of gorse ously referred to as C. succedana (Denis & Gorse growth was dense at Hinewai, seed (Ulex europaeus L.) was compared Schiffermüller) (Fowler et al. 2004), was Onekaka and Trotters Gorge and formed at six sites over the South Island, New introduced into New Zealand in 1992 after a complete canopy, whereas at the other Zealand. The highest percentage (45%) completion of research into host-plant spe- sites gorse bushes were scattered in pas- of pods damaged by C. -
Managing for Species: Integrating the Needs of England’S Priority Species Into Habitat Management
Natural England Research Report NERR024 Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 1 Report www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR024 Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 1 Report Webb, J.R., Drewitt, A.L. and Measures, G.H. Natural England Published on 15 January 2010 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2010 Project details This report results from work undertaken by the Evidence Team, Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN024 – Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England‟s priority species into habitat management. This report should be cited as: WEBB, J.R., DREWITT, A.L., & MEASURES, G.H., 2010. Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England‟s priority species into habitat management. Part 1 Report. Natural England Research Reports, Number 024. Project manager Jon Webb Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA Tel: 0300 0605264 Fax: 0300 0603888 [email protected] Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat i management. Part 1 Report Acknowledgements Many thanks to all those who have contributed to and commented on various drafts, particularly those who contributed original material. -
A Search in Spain and Portugal for Potential Biocontrol Agents for Gorse ( Ulex Europaeus Europaeus L.) in Hawai‘I
A Search in Spain and Portugal for Potential Biocontrol Agents for Gorse ( Ulex europaeus europaeus L.) in Hawai‘i A contracted research project for Parker Ranch Inc., Hawaii, USA Conducted by CSIRO Entomology Compiled by the Principal Scientist Dr. Andy Sheppard CSIRO Entomology Executive Summary In line with reporting at the end of this contracted research project, this is the final report on the suitability of each species as a potential control agent for gorse, Ulex europaeus europaeus L. in Hawaii. The two aims of this project were to survey the native evolutionary centre of origin of Ulex for autumn active insects that reduce seed production in autumn developed pods and to look for autumn active root boring insects as potential biological control agents for gorse in Hawaii. There were very low levels of pod production by gorse during the autumn flowering period of 2003, despite a preceding hot summer that should have provided the conditions for strong early flower bud development. Gorse pods that clearly developed and matured during this period (classed as brown pods) only generated a potential of 0-300 seeds per mature plant in autumn and suffered only 0.1% seed losses to the apionid seed weevil Exapion and 7% seed loss to pod moths of the genus Cydia . It was concluded that insect activity on gorse pods in autumn in the native range is not high enough to expect there to be any autumn specific insects available as potential biological control agents for gorse in Hawaii and indeed none were successfully reared out. Most root feeding insect activity found appeared to be from insects active at different times of the year, suggesting further surveys for root feeding insects should take place in spring-summer.