Open Eyes Economy Summit Krakow November 15-16, 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Eyes Economy Summit Krakow November 15-16, 2016 OPEN EYES ECONOMY SUMMIT KRAKOW NOVEMBER 15-16, 2016 EDWIN BENDYK JERZY BUZEK JERZY HAUSNER MICHAŁ KUDŁACZ ADAM DANIEL ROTFELD MATEUSZ ZMYŚLONY OPEN EYES BOOK The Open Eyes Economy Summit Krakow, November 15-16, 2016 PUBLISHED BY Fundacja Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej ul. Rakowicka 10B/10 31-510 Kraków © Fundacja GAP This publication reflects only the views of its Authors TRANSLATED BY Rafał Śmietana, Jim Todd EDITED AND PROOFREAD BY Anna Chrabąszcz, Robert Chrabąszcz, Paula Wolecka ORGANISATIONAL ASSISTANCE Dagmara Bednarczyk, Tomasz Wojtas, Radosław Wójcik GRAPHIC DESIGN AND LAYOUT BY Eskadra Sp. z o.o. PRINTED BY Know How ISBN: 978-83-942293-7-5 CONTENTS FOREWORD 5 INTRODUCTION: 9 BRAND AS CULTURE – CULTURE AS BRAND Mateusz Zmyślony THE INTERNATIONAL ORDER: 43 VALUES VS. INTERESTS AND POTENTIALS Adam Daniel Rotfeld THE CIVILISATIONAL AND 69 CULTURE-FORMING ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY Jerzy Buzek THE FUTURE OF THE MARKET ECONOMY 77 – FROM AN OPPORTUNISTIC ECONOMIC GAME TO A RELATIONAL ONE Jerzy Hausner THE CITY-IDEA – A NEW APPROACH 119 TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT Edwin Bendyk, Jerzy Hausner, Michał Kudłacz 2016 3 4 OEES FORE- WORD 2016 5 FOREWORD The need to revise a number of established economic beliefs and business practices appears to be as obvious as it is difficult. We have come up with the Open Eyes Economy Summit (OEES) not just to talk about them, but first of all, to contribute to such a revision. This publication and the texts contained in it are intended to serve this purpose. They offer not only different perspectives than those prevailing so far, but also ways out of the crisis situation. The texts address the main themes of the programme of the Congress: 1) the Firm-Idea as a new approach to value in business, 2) Brand-Culture as a new understanding of marketing, and 3) the City-Idea as a new way of dealing with urban development. They focus on specific areas that we believe at this mo- ment to be crucial for thinking about the necessary changes in the functioning of the market economy. What they have in common is a deep conviction that we have lost our way, because we have abandoned all references to values ​​and the axiological-normative order in our reflections, focusing instead mainly on business, on transactions, and on operational efficiency. If we do not bridge this gap by engaging in an open and responsible discourse, we will continue to stray, chaotically trying everything in the hope that eventually we will find a way out of the current dramatic situation. Even though we have numerous opportunities to act, we get lost, putting aside the question of normativity. We cannot decide which of the possible solutions to adopt, and which to reject for fundamental reasons. We cast about opportunistically trying to salvage what- ever we can instead of making deliberate, strategic choices. The papers included in this volume have been prepared especially for the FIRMOEES, with the exception of Professor Jerzy Buzek’s address. Their content re- flects a number of pre-Congress discussions, seminars, and conferences. We do not wish to restrict ourselves to hosting a single event; we want to inspire an IDEAintellectual movement which is as broad as possible. 6 OEES BRAND CULTURE The previous debates were held here in Krakow – a city famous for its capa- city to reconcile tradition with modernity. Its great legacy is rooted in its open- ness, and it still needs this quality in order not only to protect this heritage, but also to transform and enrich it. If the Open Eyes Economy is to develop robustly, we must go beyond our city wherever people want to open their eyes to seek new approaches and solutions. We want to encourage the representatives of very different professional and social groups to join in this movement, otherwise will be impossible to accom- plish the necessary change. These intentions are reflected in the rich and varied Congress programme, in the diversity of experiences, and in the interests of the guest speakers. We intend the Open Eyes Economy Summit to be a summit meeting, a proper summit to be climbed in order to look around and find the right paths leading us to development. Such a summit cannot be reached without a well-organised effort, without successive base camps. Every year, we want to continue climbing in a larger group, to organise discussions in different places – in Poland and abroad – mobilising those who are dissatisfied with the current state of the economy and economics. Subsequent volumes of the Open Eyes Book will document our intellectual mountain climbing expeditions. Jerzy Hausner Chairman of the Programme Council Open Eyes Economy Summit CITY IDEA 2016 7 8 OEES Mateusz ZMYŚLONY INTRODUCTION: BRAND AS CULTURE – CULTURE AS BRAND 2016 9 10 OEES Mateusz Zmyślony What generates culture? Advertising, PR, marketing undoubtedly generate culture – as do theatres, cine- mas, the media, museums, as well as city streets, the internet and... politics. Advertising messages – which constitute a version of culture – invade our minds via all possible channels. They shape our tastes, generate trends, tempt, but often hurt and mislead. Culture can be either high or low. The message may be vulgar, but it can be made elegant – yet it still remains a message that contributes to the shaping of culture. Culture comprises not only art galleries and concert halls. Nowadays, culture is everywhere – as street art in the streets, as design in clothing and furniture shops, as culinary culture – on our tables and in the deli. Brands ceased to be badges, boxes and/or packages. They even ceased to be specific products or services, since the latter can be copied and imitated with ever-increasing ease. Genuine Brands are becoming messages based on values under our (open) eyes. The philosophy of Open Eyes Economy embraces social values, the so- called intangible assets, or non-material values. Added values or key values? So far, such values ​​were often referred to as ADDED values. Design, social com- mitment of a brand, and its environmental responsibility were ‘added’ to the functional features of a product or service. Today, the genuine, the most valuable brands must face a crisis of public trust in businesses and institutions. In order to regain – or win – that trust, and then to retain it, firms and institutions must build anew their market mission and simultaneously their social mission. The credibility of such a mission requires that the hitherto ‘added’ values should become the target of existence of a particular Firm and a former Brand. We call such a firm – a Firm-Idea and its brand – a Brand–Culture. Such a Firm – with such a Brand – operates totally differently in the social and the public space (i.e. in our City-Idea). It seeks to creatively co-develop it and become in- volved in it, much in the same way as Allegro installs bicycle racks, Lech builds 2016 11 BRAND AS CULTURE – CULTURE AS BRAND microparks, and Nivea invests in outdoor urban gyms. In Open Eyes Economy, such activities are obvious, and the question to be asked is: What are the appro- priate proportions? If a firm’s social commitment is substantial, we are dealing with a Firm-Idea. If the impact of its commitment to society is substantial, we are dealing with Brand-Culture. Hence, the Firm-Idea puts social values, such as social utility, sensitivity, and commitment above all else. From its very foundations, it wants to be ecolo- gical and managed in accordance with the principles of sustainable develop- ment. Its brand entails a deliberate generation of CULTURE, which is not only an interesting and true story that reaches the public. To generate CULTURE also means to consciously shape the world of the Firm and the Brand among its employees, consumers, business partners, and the media. Naturally, the most reasonable areas of operation of such a Firm and such a Brand are logi- cally associated with its field of competence. Thus, if you manufacture run- ning shoes, you should build your reputation among the fans of this activity. Hence, if Adidas and Nike invest in the popularisation of a healthy and active lifestyle, promote mass running events or Nordic walking – that is good. But it is still better if we engage in these sports using shoes manufactured in a Source: Adidas press release. 12 OEES Mateusz Zmyślony responsible and thoughtful manner, such as Adidas x Parley, made entirely from recycled materials and associated with the struggle to rid the oceans of plastic waste. These shoes embody not only a pure idea, but also a good design and responsibility. Certainly, such initiatives are bound to become something important when they find their way into mass distribution … but Rome was not built in a day. If you make clothes, help your customer to dress from head to toe ethically and ecologically, not just fashionably. Although fashion also represents culture, it often lacks moral foundations and thus becomes merely an aesthetic culture, which is simply shallow. Endowing brands with cultural foundations is the fu- ture not only of marketing or marketing communication, rather, it represents the evolution towards social communication based on truth, knowledge, and authority instead of manipulation, which is unfortunately still common nowa- days. Profit > Trust or Trust > Profit? The Firm-Idea exists, because it is needed by people and it has a mission to accomplish. Naturally, in a sense, it also exists in order to generate a PROFIT. Without it, it would be impossible to develop and implement its mission. But in the near future, it will make a profit when (and only when) it wins the trust of its customers.
Recommended publications
  • In Annual Speeches of the Republic of Poland Ministers of Foreign Affairs After 2001
    Przegląd Strategiczny 2017, nr 10 Piotr POCHYŁY DOI : 10.14746/ps.2017.1.12 University of Zielona Góra THE CONCEPT OF “SECURITY” IN ANNUAL SPEECHES OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND MINISTERS OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AFTER 2001 The purpose of the publication is to present how the concept of security has been de- fined in annual speeches of Poland’s foreign ministers after the 9/11 attacks in 2001. Research problem: the impact of the international situation on ways of ensuring Po- land’s security in the annual speeches of Polish foreign ministers. Apart from the as- pect of classically understood security, the analysis also covers modern categories of security that is economic, public, ecological, energy or food security. The temporal range is from 2001 to 2017. Following the definition in the Polish Language Diction- ary published by PWN I define “security” as “the state of non-threat” (Bezpieczeństwo, 2017). * * * Every year foreign ministers of Poland give their annual speeches – officially known as the Information of the Foreign Minister on the goals of foreign policy, in which they define priorities, characterize challenges, and present corrections to the policy. Sometimes it is just an ordinary fulfilment of the obligation, which does not provoke greater conflicts or reflections and is presented in the nearly empty hall, but since 2010, after the plane crash near Smolensk, there have been very exciting debates connected with disputes in the Parliament (speeches given by Radosław Sikorski between 2011–2014), also in connection to responsibility for state security. The speeches which were urgent responses to events in the world (Sikorski, 2014) and the ones that were given when new governments came to power: (Cimoszewicz, 2002; Meller, 2006; Sikorski, 2008; Sikorski, 2012; Waszczykowski, 2016) will be particularly relevant to the search for answers to the research problem because apart from presenting current issues the ministers were obliged to discuss four-year for- eign policy assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • A Public Debate and Seminar on the 40Th
    “CRACKING BORDERS, GROWING WALLS. EUROPEANS FACING THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS” A public debate and seminar on the 40 th anniversary of the declaration of the Helsinki Final Act 8-9 September 2015, Warsaw DRAFT PROGRAMME Tuesday, 8 September 2015 Teatr Polski / Polish Theatre, Warsaw Public debate 16.00 Registration Coffee and refreshments 17.00 Welcome: Jarosław Kuisz, Kultura Liberalna, University of Warsaw, CNRS Paris Michael Thoss, Allianz Kulturstiftung Cornelius Ochmann, Stiftung für deutsch-polnische Zusammenarbeit Antje Contius, Fischer Stiftung 17.15 Opening presentations: Robert Cooper, Special Advisor at the European Commission Yaroslav Hrytsak, Ukrainian Catholic University, Lviv Jarosław Pietras, General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union 17.40 Panel 1: The current crisis Viola von Cramon, Alliance '90/The Greens Ola Hnatiuk, Polish Academy of Sciences Josef Joffe, publisher-editor of Die Zeit, Hoover Institution, Harvard University Aleksander Smolar, President of Stefan Batory Foundation, CNRS Paris Matt Steinglass, The Economist Chairing : Karolina Wigura, Kultura Liberalna, University of Warsaw, and Katya Gorchinskaya, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna 19.00 Panel 2: Looking into the future of European integration Ulrike Guérot, European Democracy Lab Asle Toje, Norwegian Nobel Institute Roman Kuźniar, former foreign policy advisor to President Bronisław Komorowski Adam Daniel Rotfeld, University of Warsaw, former Poland’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Adam Garfinkle, The American
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution, War and Their Consequences 16-17 March 2018
    Revolution, War and Their Consequences 16-17 March 2018 College of Europe Natolin Campus (Warsaw) 16 March 2018, Friday 10:00 am – 12:30 pm Welcome Ewa Ośniecka-Tamecka, Vice-Rector of College of Europe Opening remarks François Hollande, former President of the Republic of France Arsenii Yatsenyuk, former Prime Minister of Ukraine Sviatoslav Shevchuk, Major Archbishop of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church Short video introduction I. Discussion: International consequences of the 2014 Revolution of Dignity Introduction: Dan Fried, the State Department’s Coordinator for Sanctions Policy, former US Ambassador to Poland Adam Daniel Rotfeld, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland Borys Tarasyuk, Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Former minister of foreign affairs. Danylo Lubkivsky, former Deputy Foreign Minister of Ukraine Kataryna Wolczuk, Professor of East European Politics, University of Birmingham Igor Gretskiy, Professor, St. Petersburg State University 3R PROJECT College of Europe ul. Nowoursynowska 84 Phone: +48 22 54 59 401 Natolin Campus PL-02-797 Warsaw, Poland Email: [email protected] Chairperson: Professor Richard Butterwick-Pawlikowski, Professor Georges Mink, Dr Paweł Kowal 12:30 pm – 2:30 pm lunch 2:30 pm – 4:00 pm II Discussion: The annexation of Crimea – its consequences for Ukraine and Europe (International and legal aspects, Ukrainian policy towards Crimea, the Crimean Tatars) Introductory remarks: Refat Chubarov, chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar, Sławomir
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles by the USSR Before and During World War II: an International Legal Study, 45 Case W
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 45 | Issue 3 2012 The rC ime of Genocide Committed against the Poles by the USSR before and during World War II: An International Legal Study Karol Karski Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Karol Karski, The Crime of Genocide Committed against the Poles by the USSR before and during World War II: An International Legal Study, 45 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 703 (2013) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol45/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 45 Spring 2013 Issue 3 The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles by the USSR Before and During WWII: An International Legal Study Karol Karski Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law·Vol. 45·2013 The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles by the USSR Before and During World War II: An International Legal Study Karol Karski* The USSR’s genocidal activity against the Polish nation started before World War II. For instance, during the NKVD’s “Polish operation” of 1937 and 1938, the Communist regime exterminated about 85,000 Poles living at that time on the pre- war territory of the USSR.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Information on the Polish Foreign Policy Presented by The
    Minister's Annual Address 2005 Government information on the Polish foreign policy presented by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prof. Adam Daniel Rotfeld, at the session of the Sejm on 21 st January 2005 Mister President, Mister Prime Minister, Mister Speaker, Members of the House, I take the floor with certain anxiety and diffidence. For it is the first time that I stand on this rostrum as the newly appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs. What is more, I am to present to the House the priorities and tenets of Polish foreign policy prepared under your leadership, Mister Speaker, when you were executing the office of the Minister of Foreign Affairs with such success. My address opens the fourth and last annual debate on foreign policy during this term of the Sejm. We have entered an election year. That is significant, since the clear line formerly separating domestic and international affairs has become blurred in our times. I mention this, because I would like to explain in the beginning that it is not my intention to become involved in any way in the pre-election campaign. The national interest of the Polish State obligate us to treat external policy and its instrument – diplomacy – in a way transcending party lines. I wish to ensure optimum effectiveness of our actions and continuity in all the undertakings initiated by Minister Krzysztof Skubiszewski in the autumn of 1989, and advanced over the next 15 years by his successors – Andrzej Olechowski, Władysław Bartoszewski, Dariusz Rosati, Bronisław Geremek and Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz. Mister Speaker, Members of the House, With those assumptions in mind, I wish to present a list of priorities on the agenda of our foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1918 Czworka I-IV.Vp
    P D D KOMITET REDAKCYJNY Przewodniczący Sławomir Dębski Wiceprzewodniczący i redaktor naczelny Włodzimierz Borodziej Członkowie zwyczajni Jerzy W. Borejsza, Bogdan Grzeloński, Magdalena Hułas, Aleksander Kochański, Jan Kopiec, Marek Kornat, Maciej Koźmiński, Andrzej Kunert, Zbigniew Landau, Piotr Łossowski, Paweł Machcewicz, Andrzej Paczkowski, Wojciech Rojek, Adam Daniel Rotfeld, Krzysztof Ruchniewicz, Ryszard Stemplowski, Jerzy Tomaszewski, Piotr Wandycz, Wojciech Wrzesiński, Stanisław Żerko Członkowie ex officio dyrektor Archiwum MSZ – Małgorzata Mroczkowska Naczelny Dyrektor Archiwów Państwowych – Sławomir Radoń dyrektor Archiwum Akt Nowych – Tadeusz Krawczak Sekretarz Piotr Długołęcki DOKUMENTY DYPLOMATYCZNE listopad–grudzień REDAKTOR Sławomir Dębski WSPÓŁPRACA Piotr Długołęcki POLSKI INSTYTUT SPRAW MIĘDZYNARODOWYCH WARSZAWA 2008 Wydawca dziękuje Archiwum Akt Nowych za pomoc udzieloną przy powstawaniu publikacji © POLSKI INSTYTUT SPRAW MIĘDZYNARODOWYCH 2008 www.pism.pl OPRACOWANIE WYDAWNICZE Marta Przyłuska-Brzostek Jolanta Rudzińska INDEKS OSOBOWY Maria Konopka-Wichrowska INDEKS RZECZOWY Marta Przyłuska-Brzostek REDAKCJA TECHNICZNA Dorota Dołęgowska PROJEKT OKŁADKI Dorota Dołęgowska ISBN: 978-83-89607-54-6 POLSKI INSTYTUT SPRAW MIĘDZYNARODOWYCH UL. WARECKA 1A, 00-950 WARSZAWA Druk: Drukarnia nr 1, 02-521 Warszawa, ul. Rakowiecka 37 SPIS TREŚCI W S T Ę P . .V I I L I S T A D O K U M E N T Ó W . .X I X D O K U M E N T Y . .1 A N E K S . .4 1 3 W Y K A Z S K R Ó T Ó W . .4 2 1 I N D E K S R Z E C Z O W Y . .4 2 3 I N D E K S O S O B O W Y . .4 3 3 WSTĘP W roku 1918, sto dwadzieścia trzy lata po ostatnim rozbiorze Polski, w toku pierwszej w dziejach ludzkości wojny powszechnej, dla sprawy polskiej zaczęła się kształtować wyjątkowo korzystna koniunktura.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilateralna Dyplomacja Państw Środkowoeuropejskich Przed I Po 1989 Roku*
    DOI: 10�17951/m�2016�1�9 ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN – POLONIA VOL. I SECTIO M 2016 Jacek Czaputowicz Uniwersytet Warszawski Multilateralna dyplomacja państw środkowoeuropejskich przed i po 1989 roku* 1. Wstęp Pojęcie Europy Środkowej jest różnie definiowane� W węższym rozumieniu obszar ten tworzą Polska, Czechy, Słowacja, Węgry, Rumunia i Bułgaria� Państwa te były niepodległe w okresie międzywojennym i zachowały swoją państwowość w czasie zimnej wojny� W szerszym rozumieniu do Europy Środkowej zalicza się państwa leżące między Niemcami a obszarem Wspólnoty Niepodległych Państw, a więc także państwa bałtyckie, które wchodziły w skład ZSRR – Litwę, Łotwę i Estonię, oraz państwa bałkańskie, powstałe z rozpadu Jugosławii – Chorwację, Słowenię, Bośnię i Hercegowinę, Jugosławię, Macedonię, Czarnogórę i Albanię� W niniejszym artykule stosowane będzie węższe rozumienie Europy Środkowej� Z kolei multilateralizm będziemy rozumieć nie tylko jako praktykę koordynowa- nia polityki przez grupę państw, lecz także jako czynienie tego zgodnie z pewnymi zasadami1� Zasady te to niepodzielność, rozszerzona wzajemność oraz powszechne zasady postępowania� Zasada niepodzielności oznacza, że grupa państw nie tworzy * Wcześniejsza wersja artykułu ukazała się w języku angielskim – Multilateral Diplomats of Central European States Before and After 1989, [w:] Routledge Handbook of International Or- ganizations, ed� B� Reinalda, [b�o�w�], London–New York 2013, s� 244–256� 1 R. O� Keohane, Multilateralism. An Agenda for Research, „International
    [Show full text]
  • A Future Security Agenda for Europe
    A Future Security Agenda for Europe Report of the Independent Working Group established by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute October 1996 Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent international institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of arms control and disarmament. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden’s 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed mainly by the Swedish Parliament. The staff and the Governing Board are international. The Institute also has an Advisory Committee as an international consultative body. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Professor Daniel Tarschys, Chairman (Sweden) Sir Brian Urquhart, Vice-Chairman (United Kingdom) Dr Oscar Arias Sánchez (Costa Rica) Dr Ryukichi Imai (Japan) Professor Catherine Kelleher (United States) Dr Marjatta Rautio (Finland) Dr Lothar Rühl (Germany) Dr Abdullah Toukan (Jordan) The Director Director Dr Adam Daniel Rotfeld (Poland) Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Frösunda, S-171 53 Solna, Sweden Cable: SIPRI Telephone: 46 8/655 97 00 Telefax: 46 8/655 97 33 Email: [email protected] Internet URL: http://www.sipri.se A Future Security Agenda for Europe Co-chairmen of the Independent Working Group on A Future Security Agenda for Europe Daniel Tarschys, Chairman of the SIPRI Governing Board Adam Daniel Rotfeld, Director of SIPRI A Future Security Agenda for Europe Report of the Independent Working Group established by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Stockholm, October 1996 © SIPRI, 1996 Contents Preface vii Findings of the Independent Working Group 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ACADEMY of YOUNG DIPLOMATS the Academy of Young
    ACADEMY OF YOUNG DIPLOMATS The Academy of Young Diplomats is an educational program of the European Academy of Diplomacy, assisting students and young graduates in their preparation for work in the Polish Foreign Service, Polish Civil Service, as well as the European institutions and international organizations. The participants have the opportunity to be acquainted with both the competition procedures to each of the institutions and with the practicalities of work in the chosen profession. The Academy’s program is divided into seven 3-day, sessions, during which participants are being trained by the most outstanding Polish and foreign specialists in the field of international relations and diplomacy. Since 2004 over 1800 people have graduated from AYD’s programs. Many of our graduates currently work for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European institutions or for international business and non-profit organizations. During our sessions we had the pleasure to host, among others Valdas Adamkus, Victor Ashe, Władysław Bartoszewski, Jan Krzysztof Bielecki, Zbigniew Brzeziński, Adam Boniecki, Jerzy Buzek, Jacek Czaputowicz, Norman Davies, Mikołaj Dowgielewicz, Lee Feinstein, Marek Goliszewski, Danuta Hübner, Garii Kasparow, Grzegorz W. Kołodko, Paweł Kowal, Bernard Kouchner, Jan Kułakowski, Kazimierz Kutz, Aleksander Kwaśniewski, Richard Lugar, Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Stefan Meller, Alaksandr Milinkiewicz, Stephen Mull, Zdzisław Najder, Jan Olbrycht, Daniel Olbrychski, Józef Oleksy, Andrzej Olechowski, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Witold Orłowski, Robert Picht, Jarosław Pietras, Janusz Reiter, Adam Daniel Rotfeld, Borys Tarasiuk, Javier Solana, Jacek Saryusz- Wolski, Lech Wałęsa, Witold Waszczykowski, Zbigniew Zaleski. Find out more on our website: www.diplomats.pl .
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Ukraine
    The future of Ukraine The future of Ukraine depends most of all on the Ukrainians themselves. They defended their democracy and future 10 years ago, during the Orange Revolution, and are standing up for those values again today. As Europeans grow disenchanted with the idea of a common Europe, people in Ukraine are fighting for that idea and for their country's place in Europe. Defending Ukraine from the authoritarian temptations of its corrupt leaders is in the interests of the democratic world. We cannot afford to turn our back on Ukraine. The new authoritarians in Kyiv should know that there will be a high price to pay for their repressive policies and for abandoning the European aspirations of the people. It is not too late for us to change things for the better and prevent Ukraine from becoming a dictatorship. Passivity in the face of the authoritarian turn in Ukraine and the country's reintegration into a newly expanding Russian imperial sphere of interests pose a threat to the European Union’s integrity. It is a threat not just to the moral integrity of the Union but possibly to its internal institutional integrity as well. Alongside the diplomatic and economic measures taken by individual states and the entire EU, independent democratic initiatives should make efforts to defend victims of repression, support civil society and strengthen independent media. The quality of any democracy depends to a great extent on what its citizens know about their country and the world. In Ukraine, the picture of the world is shaped by the authorities, who control most of the mass media, and Russian television channels faithful to President Putin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orange Ribbon: a Calendar of the Political Crisis in Ukraine
    OÂRODEK STUDIÓW WSCHODNICH Centre for Eastern Studies THE ORANGE RIBBON A calendar of the political crisis in Ukraine autumn 2004 compiled by Wojciech Stanis∏awski Warsaw 2005 © Copyright by Centre for Eastern Studies Expert editor Tadeusz Olszaƒski Editor of Polish text Ma∏gorzata Zar´bska Additional research Anna ¸abuszewska English translation Ilona Duchnowicz, Izabela Zygmunt Proof-reading Jim Todd Publisher OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland tel. +48 /22/ 525 80 00 fax +48 /22/ 525 80 40 We have been able to publish this survey thanks to financial support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland and the Chancellery of the Prime Minister Contents Foreword / 5 19–31 OCTOBER: Two out of fourteen / 7 1–21 NOVEMBER: Three restless weeks / 17 22–24 NOVEMBER: The march to the Maidan / 34 25–26 NOVEMBER: The first “Round Table” / 48 27–28 NOVEMBER: The Donetsk autonomy / 61 29 NOVEMBER – 1 DECEMBER: The second “Round Table” / 66 2–6 DECEMBER: A very fragile compromise / 78 6 DECEMBER: The third “Round Table” / 89 7–26 DECEMBER: The long march / 93 27–31 DECEMBER: Champagne from Monday, cheap gas till Friday / 114 JANUARY 2005: The epilogue to the storm / 121 In late autumn 2004, orange ribbons, scarves and kerchiefs became popular cloth- ing accessories not only in Ukraine but also abroad. They expressed solidarity with the Ukrainians protesting against electoral fraud, especially those who stayed in Kiev’s main square, Maidan Nezalezhnosti, defying freezing tempera- tures. Outside Ukraine, orange ribbons were seen most frequently in the streets of Polish cities.
    [Show full text]