Polygraph Protection Act Claim Denied in Recent Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polygraph Protection Act Claim Denied in Recent Case THE OLDEST LAW JOURNAL IN THE UNITED STATES 1843-2017 PHILADELPHIA, MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 VOL 257 • NO. 53 EMPLOYMENT LAW Polygraph Protection Act Claim Denied in Recent Case BY SID STEINBERG misrepresentation, intentional interfer- SID STEINBERG is a Special to the Legal ence with contractual relations, and principal and chair of Post & Schell’s employment misappropriation of trade secrets. lthough we often plead or de- and employee relations JURY RETURNS MIXED VERDICT fend various state law claims and labor practice groups. ancillary to our more usual Steinberg’s practice involves After a six-day trial, the jury re- A virtually all aspects employment discrimination actions, turned a verdict in favor of Accurso of employee relations, they rarely drive cases and we rarely including litigation on his breach of contract claim, but have the opportunity to discuss such experience defending employers against employment found that because Accurso had also claims in this column. But the recent discrimination in federal and state courts. He also breached the contract, the defendants post-trial decision in Accurso v. Infra- represents employers before federal, state and local were relieved of their obligation to administrative agencies, and regularly advises Red Services, No. 13-7509 (E.D. Pa. employers in matters including employee discipline, perform. The jury then awarded dam- Feb. 16, 2018) involves a wide variety labor relations, and the creation or revision of ages to the defendants for Accurso’s of seldom-litigated claims. employee handbooks. He can be reached at sstein- breach of contract, as well as finding [email protected]. that Accurso had breached his fiduciary ROOFING BUSINESS duty to the defendants and had misap- The rather convoluted facts involve claimed that he was fired because Land propriated the defendants’ trade secrets. the employment of Peter Accurso by wanted to divert Accurso’s business to The jury found that the defendants had Infra-Red Services (IRS) and Roofing his significant other. not violate the EPPA. The jury awarded Dynamics Group (RDG), both roofing Accurso brought numerous claims nominal damages to the defendants services companies connected to Brian against the defendants, including vi- on the counterclaims for intentional Land. Accurso was responsible for so- olation of the Employee Polygraph interference with contractual rela- liciting business for both companies. Protection Act; breach of contract; tions and fraudulent misrepresentation. In 2008, he was suspected of diverting intentional interference with con- Finally, the jury found that the defen- business from RDG to friends and was tractual relations and violation of dants had violated the Wage Payment directed to take a polygraph test as the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and and Collection Law by failing to pay part of the investigation. Accurso took Collection Law. His EPPA claim re- Accurso commissions earned before his another polygraph in 2010. There was lated to the 2008 polygraph was dis- termination. Both parties filed post-trial a dispute over whether the 2010 poly- missed as time-barred, but the 2010 motions on all adverse findings. graph was mutually agreed upon or if polygraph claim remained in dispute. Accurso was forced to take the test. The defendants filed counterclaims POLYGRAPH PROTECTION ACT Accurso claimed that he was fired be- against Accurso for breach of contract, Initially, the EPPA states that “it shall cause of the polygraph results. He also breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent be unlawful for any employer ... directly or indirectly, to require, request, sug- having breached his contractual duty to numerous contractual relationships of gest, or cause any employee or prospec- maintain the confidentiality of the com- the company, including with a business tive employee to take or submit to any pany’s pricing information. Accurso was associate responsible for marketing lie detector test; to use, accept, refer to, found to have given such information (when he undermined the relationship or inquire concerning the results of any about a specific project to a friend (who, by disclosing what the company paid to lie detector test of any employee or pro- it appears, underbid RDG for the busi- someone else for the same work) and spective employee” or to otherwise take ness). One of the arguments put forward with an ongoing customer relationship. an adverse employment action against by the company in the breach of contract an employee on the basis of the results action was that Accurso had affirma- WAGE PAYMENT CLAIM UPHELD of any lie detector test. The limited ex- tively deleted all of his emails related to Despite all of the findings regarding ception to the prohibition against using the project in question, thus raising the Accurso’s business misdeeds, the jury a polygraph is where it is used “in con- issue of spoliation. There was specific found that the company had violated nection with an ongoing investigation evidence that Accurso’s email “send” the Wage Payment and Collection Law involving economic loss or injury to box contained threads that could not be by failing to pay commissions on seven the employer’s business, such as theft, found in his “in” box—thus leading to projects on which Accurso had worked embezzlement, misappropriation, or an before his termination. The court de- act of unlawful industrial espionage nied the defendants’ post-trial motions or sabotage.” In order to invoke this The case illustrates the on this claim, finding that “the mere exception, the employee must have had fact that certain compensation is not access to the property being investi- potency of the various state payable until a future date is not neces- gated and the employer must have “a law claims under the ap- sarily fatal to a WPCL claim so long reasonable suspicion that the employee as the employee is deemed to have was involved in the incident or activ- propriate circumstances ‘earned’ it during his employment.” ity under investigation.” The employer as well as the need to fol- That is, “the date compensation is pay- must then execute a signed statement, able is not necessarily the same as the provided to the examinee before the low through on commis- date compensation is earned. Naturally, test, that “sets forth with particularity an employer and employee can des- the specific incident or activity being sion payments that may be ignate some other point in the trans- investigated and the basis for testing owed even after an em- action at which time a commission particular employees.” is “earned,” but the contract between The issue at trial was whether Land ployee leaves the company. Accurso and the defendants contains relied upon the results of either poly- no such clear designation.” graph in terminating Accurso. With While Accurso appears to have re- respect to the 2008 test, there was the question of whether Accurso had peatedly sought to undermine the de- evidence that Accurso confessed to (rather sloppily) deleted the emails in fendants’ business—in what one hopes diverting business shortly after the test, question. The court allowed counsel to is a rare circumstance—the case il- such that the company did not rely on argue spoliation to the jury. lustrates the potency of the various the test’s results per se. Further, there The court also found sufficient ev- state law claims under the appropriate was a dispute as to whether Accurso idence to support the jury’s verdict circumstances as well as the need to had even taken the 2010 test, which that, by forwarding company infor- follow through on commission pay- supported the company’s contention mation to his friends in the business ments that may be owed even after an that it made no conclusions about the (who, again, underbid RDG on spe- employee leaves the company. • test’s results. cific, identified projects),A ccurso had breached his common law fiduciary BOTH PARTIES BREACH duty and that his actions rose to the Reprinted with permission from the March 19, 2018 edition of THE LEGAL INTELLIGENCER © 2018 ALM CONTRACT level of fraudulent misrepresentation. Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further The company’s breach of contract Additionally, three was sufficient evi- duplication without permission is prohibited. For information, contact 877-257-3382, [email protected] or action was based largely on Accurso dence that Accurso had interfered with visit www.almreprints.com. # 201-03-18-05.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Bound by Oath | Season 2 | Episode 5: Under Color of Law John​: In
    1 Bound By Oath | Season 2 | Episode 5: Under Color of Law John:​ In 1958, at 5:45 in the morning, Chicago police burst into the home of James and Flossie Monroe and dragged them out of bed at gunpoint. And they scared the hell out James and Flossie’s six children. Houston Stevens:​ The children we made a lot of noise. We screamed. We did a lot of yelling to alert all the neighbors. Cause we didn't know who these were. It was 14 white guys armed with pistols drawn. Jacqui Abrams:​ They pulled out a picture and showed me a picture. “Is this James Monroe?” Of course it is! Yes, that's him, but who are you? Ralph Stevens:​ All I can say is that I tried to block it out like a nightmare because it felt like, and I lived that way for many, many years growing up, like it was a nightmare. It was denial -- my way to suppress and deny how traumatic it was. John:​ James Monroe had not committed the crime he’d been accused of, and the police did not have a warrant to search his home or arrest him. So the family sued, seeking damages from the officers. But rather than suing in state court, James and Flossie did something that Congress had said they could do way back in 1871. They filed suit against the officers in federal court under Section One of the Ku Klux Klan Act. Today Section One is known as Section 1983. And it’s one of the most important and most frequently litigated civil rights laws on the books.
    [Show full text]
  • “Local Governments and Firearms: Avoiding a Jam”
    A “Local Officials: Stronger, Together” Podcast Publication “Local Governments and Firearms: Avoiding a Jam” (The materials herein become effective September 1, 2021.) (Updated portions, including “permitless” or “constitutional” carry changes, are highlighted in gray.) Scott Houston Member Liaison [email protected] 512-791-4158 www.tmlirp.org (Version 2: Last Updated June 2021) Page 1 of 46 Table of Contents Page What is the “Local Officials: Stronger, Together” Podcast Series and why should I be listening?....................................................................................................... 4 What’s in this paper? ...................................................................................................................... 5 What does the Texas “licensed carry” law authorize? .................................................................... 5 What does the so-called "constitutional" or "permitless" carry legislation authorize?....................5 In what places is a person prohibited by state law from carrying a firearm? ................................. 6 What type of signage is required to provide notice that handgun isn't allowed?...........................10 Handgun without a license.........................................................................................................10 Handgun with a license..............................................................................................................11 How has the statutory prohibition against carrying a firearm onto the premises
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    1 Master Thesis THE VALUE OF METACRITIC AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH VIDEO GAME SALES FLAVIO TONA SHNEIDER MIKE-E January, 2020 2 3 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 8 3 MARKET ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 METASCORE ............................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.1 GRADE CONVERSION .................................................................................................... 17 3.2 HARDWARE MARKET ............................................................................................................ 19 3.3 SOFTWARE MARKET ............................................................................................................. 20 4 - VALUE ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 CONSUMER ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 - VALUE FOR THE INDUSTRY AND USAGE ......................................................................................... 22 4 METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Cops Use Polygraph Less Often
    Friday, November 29, 2013 Cops use polygraph less often Examiners now questioning job hopefuls, fewer crime suspects BY DUAA ELDEIB After decades of relying on controversial polygraph examinations to help solve crimes, the Chicago Police Department has drastically scaled back on giving so-called lie-detector tests in the course of criminal investigations. In what appears to be a shift in focus, the department’s polygraph unit examiners, who previously worked under the forensic services division, have been relocated to human resources, where their primary responsibility is administering the tests to police officer candidates. The examiners’ new unit follows industry standards for conducting polygraphs. The move was said to be temporary, but one year later, the examiners are still with the personnel unit. “The temporary detail was made to address the backlog in pre-employment screenings needs,” police spokesman Adam Collins said. “There hasn’t been a move away from polygraphs as a part of criminal investigations.” Collins did not say how long the three Center on Wrongful Convictions client Nicole examiners would remain with human Harris, to whom a polygraph examiner lied, resources, which has seen a significant saying she’d failed the test. increase in the number of pre-employment polygraphs. He said only that it would be Yet the number of criminal polygraphs has “until the need has been met.” The examiners dropped considerably, from about 400 in continue to conduct criminal polygraphs as 2011 to 50 in the first eight months of 2013. the need arises, Collins said. The timing of the examiners’ move to the personnel unit corresponded with a Tribune investigation into the polygraph unit’s role in obtaining false confessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Monetary Damages
    CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Monetary Damages Chapter Contents § 1.01 Introduction § 1.02 Historical Background to Monetary Damages § 1.03 General Principles of Monetary Damages [1] Determining Whether Injuries May Be Compensated by Damages [a] Proximate Cause [b] The Standard of Certainty [2] Calculating the Damages Award [a] Compensatory Damages [i] Market Value Measure [ii] Lost Opportunity Measure [b] Unjust Enrichment [c] Augmented Damages [i] Punitive Damages [ii] Statutory Enhanced Damages [d] Interest [e] Attorneys’ Fees and Costs § 1.01 Introduction Monetary damages are a form of judicial remedy that can be awarded to a claimant in compensation for an injury or loss wrong- fully inflicted.1 This form of remedy is most commonly referred to simply as “damages.” The essence of damages is the payment of money as a release from civil liability. 1 See 1 Dobbs Law of Remedies, 3 (2d ed. 1993). 1-1 (Rel. 24) § 1.01 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DAMAGES 1-2 Because damages in Anglo-American jurisprudence are awarded by a jury of lay persons under the supervision of a judge, it is neces- sary to have certain guiding principles by which the judge can direct the jury. The rules that were developed by the judiciary to guide juries in their damages deliberations are essentially the law of damages. As one commentator has said: “The law of damages consists of the rules, standards, and methods used by the courts for measuring in money the compensation given for losses and injuries.”2 The law of intellectual property damages did not develop in a vac- uum; it is very much a product of this general law of damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix Adds to Original Shows with Sony Deal 15 October 2013
    Netflix adds to original shows with Sony deal 15 October 2013 programming to make itself a preferred location for on-demand streaming. "We were spellbound after hearing Todd, Glenn and Daniel's pitch, and knew Netflix was the perfect home for this suspenseful family drama that is going to have viewers on the edge of their seats," said Netflix vice president of original content Cindy Holland. Netflix scored a recent hit with its political drama "House of Cards," tossing conventional TV wisdom out the window when it released a full season in one fell swoop early this year. The Netflix company logo is seen at Netflix headquarters The series, which was nominated for a 2013 Emmy in Los Gatos, CA on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 for best drama, joins a recent spate of original Netflix programming that includes new episodes of "Arrested Development," plus the series "Orange is the New Black" and "Hemlock Grove." Netflix on Monday announced a deal with Sony to create a psychological thriller series for the online Netflix sees original programming as part of a streaming and DVD service, ramping up original formula to gain and hold subscribers at its $7.99-a- programming to win subscribers. month fee that covers a vast catalog of pre- released TV shows and movies. "Damages" creators Todd Kessler, Daniel Zelman, and Glenn Kessler will begin production of a © 2013 AFP 13-episode first season of the show from Sony Pictures Television early next year. The yet-unnamed series will broadcast exclusively on Netflix, according to the California-based Internet company.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon and IMDB Sued for Not Respecting Elders | Page 1
    Amazon And IMDB Sued FOr Not Respecting Elders | Page 1 Amazon And IMDB Sued FOr Not Respecting Elders By: Jack Greiner on October 19, 2011 on graydon.law Well, sort of. An actress who identifies herself as Jane Doe has sued the Internet Movie Database Web site, and its parent company, Amazon, for revealing her actual age. I’m not making that up. Here’s the actual complaint, which was filed in a federal court in Seattle. In case you haven’t used it, IMDB is a Web site that has detailed information on any movie ever made. I personally love it. I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve watched a movie on TV and wondered who the actor was in some small role, and where I’d seen him before. IMDB has all that information. But I digress. According to the complaint, Jane Doe is of Asian descent, and her given name is difficult for Americans to spell and pronounce. She has for that reason used a stage name throughout her career. She is also very careful not to provide personal information, including her true age. According to the complaint, “[i]n the entertainment industry, youth is king. If one is perceived to be “over-the-hill” i.e., approaching 40, it is nearly impossible for an up-and-coming actress, such as plaintiff, to get work.” IMDB also offers a service called IMDbPro, which offers “industry insider” information to paying customers. Ms. Doe signed up for the service and in so doing, provided her name, birth date and other personal information.
    [Show full text]
  • POLYGRAPH PROTECTION ACT of 1981 Act 44 of 1982 an ACT To
    POLYGRAPH PROTECTION ACT OF 1981 Act 44 of 1982 AN ACT to prohibit employers and employment agencies from requiring polygraph examinations of employees and applicants for employment; to prohibit employers and employment agencies from discriminating against employees and applicants for employment because they refuse or decline to take a polygraph examination; to provide that an employer or employment agency shall not take any action against an employee because of an alleged or actual opinion that an employee did not tell the truth during a polygraph examination; to regulate the use of polygraph examinations by employers and employment agencies; to regulate the administration of polygraph examinations to employees and applicants for employment; and to provide remedies and penalties for violations of this act. History: 1982, Act 44, Eff. Mar. 30, 1983. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 37.201 Short title. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "polygraph protection act of 1981". History: 1982, Act 44, Eff. Mar. 30, 1983. 37.202 Definitions. Sec. 2. As used in this act: (a) "Employee" means an individual who works for another person for compensation. (b) "Employer" means a person who employs 1 or more persons or who accepts applications for employment, including an agent of an employer. (c) "Employment agency" means a person regularly undertaking with or without compensation to procure, refer, recruit, or place for an employer or person the opportunity to work for an employer, and includes an agent of that person. (d) "Examiner" means any person who does any of the following: (i) Purports to detect deception, verify truthfulness, or provide a diagnostic opinion of either of these through instrumentation or the use of a mechanical device.
    [Show full text]
  • Using User Created Game Reviews for Sentiment Analysis: a Method for Researching User Attitudes
    Using User Created Game Reviews for Sentiment Analysis: A Method for Researching User Attitudes Björn Strååt Harko Verhagen Stockholm University Stockholm University Department of Computer Department of Computer and Systems Sciences and Systems Sciences Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT provide user ratings and review services, e.g. products on This paper presents a method for gathering and evaluating amazon.com online store, tourist guides such as Yelp.com, user attitudes towards previously released video games. All and TripAdvisor.com, movie reviews such as user reviews from two video game franchise were collected. rottentomatoes.com, and many more. The video game The most frequently mentioned words of the games were community is no different. The content provider service derived from this dataset through word frequency analysis. Steam allows the users to vote and comment on games, and The words, called “aspects” were then further analyzed the website Metacritic.com present both expert- and user through a manual aspect based sentiment analysis. The final created reviews. User created content offers a vast and analysis show that the rating of user review to a high degree varied source of data for anyone who wish to explore the correlate with the sentiment of the aspect in question, if the user sentiment beyond the basic rating of previously data set is large enough. This knowledge is valuable for a released products. developer who wishes to learn more about previous games success or failure factors. In this study, we have performed an Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) [2] based on data gathered Author Keywords from user reviews regarding two video game series, on Sentiment; sentiment analysis; user created content; reviews Metacritic.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Byrne Under Wraps How She Charmed the World with Her Hidden Talent
    JULY 31, 2016 + TALL ORDER: DOES YOUR DATE MEASURE UP? SHIFT YOUR CAREER UP A GEAR DECADENT PEANUT BUTTER DESSERTS ROSE BYRNE UNDER WRAPS HOW SHE CHARMED THE WORLD WITH HER HIDDEN TALENT SNS31JUL16p001 1 22/07/16 3:27 PM (cover_story) Roses She’s no garden-variety star. Rose Byrne is now in full bloom as a sought-after comic actor, says Tiffany Bakker 10 | SUNDAYSTYLE.COM.AU 11 SVS31JUL16p010 10 22/07/16 4:48 PM ose Byrne is pondering like I’m a big name,” she says. “I feel like her day job. “Acting is I’ve been very lucky in the people I’ve embarrassing, absolutely,” been able to work with.” she says, with a hearty laugh. In recent years, of course, there has R“Just the vulnerability it requires, whether been her much-vaunted emergence as in a performance or doing interviews. It’s a big-screen comedy superstar (more an odd thing, and it’s also a bit of a silly job. on that later), but she has just as easily I mean, it’s a great job, and I take it navigated indie drama (Adult Beginners), seriously and I’m passionate about it, but dramedy (The Meddler), horror (Insidious), I know I’m not curing cancer, so you have musicals (Annie), tent-pole franchises (the to have some perspective on it.” X-Men series), and television (Damages). When we meet, Byrne is mid-pedicure Ask her to reflect on her extraordinary at a downtown New York hotel, apologising success and she squirms slightly.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPA Polygraph Document
    Case 3:12-cv-00460-JM-MDD Document 161 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 M.G., et al. CASE NO. 12cv0460 JM(MDD) 13cv1891 JM(MDD) 11 Plaintiffs, 13cv1892 JM(MDD) vs. 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 13 METROPOLITAN INTERPRETERS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY AND TRANSLATORS, INC., J.C., JUDGMENT 14 L.L., R.P., M.L., B.A., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EILEEN 15 ZEIDLER, SONDRA HESTER, DAREK KITLINSKI, WILLIAM R. 16 SHERMAN, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Defendants Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, Inc. (“Metropolitan”) and 20 J.C., R.P., M.L., B.A. and C.G. (the “Individual Defendants”) move for partial 21 summary judgment on the claims arising under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act 22 (“EPPA”), 29 U.S.C. §§2002(1)(2), and (3), and the punitive damages claim. Plaintiffs 23 M.G, F.M., L.A., J.M., L.G., F.B., M.N., R.G., L.S., E.R., M.D., M.T., E.S., and L.P. 24 oppose the motion and separately move for summary judgment on the issue of whether 25 Metropolitan and the Individual Defendants violated various provisions of EPPA. 26 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the court finds this matter appropriate for decision 27 without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants summary 28 judgment in favor of defendants R.P., M.L., B.A. and C.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Case Law Under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act: a Practical Review
    Recent Case Law Under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act: A Practical Review AMY ONDER AND MICHAEL BRITTAN This article discusses the most recent case law and provides employer guidelines for complying with the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. he Employee Polygraph Protection Act (“EPPA”) is one of the least-known federal workplace statutes, yet its broad prohibitions Thave virtually eliminated polygraph exams from the workplace. The EPPA forbids employers from administering lie detector tests dur- ing pre-employment screening and also during the course of employment. Several exceptions to the EPPA do permit polygraph examinations under limited circumstances, provided that certain statutory procedures are ob- served. An employer who violates this statute has exposure to a penalty of up to $10,000, as well as the prospect of a civil lawsuit by the employee or prospective employee to recover lost wages and benefits, attorney’s fees, and court costs. An employee (or potential employee) may also be entitled to equitable relief in addition to damages, which could include reinstate- ment (if the employee or prospective employee was unlawfully fired or denied a job based on test results), and promotion. Amy Onder is the General Counsel of iXP Corporation, a company that provides public safety and emergency response services to entities of all sizes, including fire departments, police departments, municipalities, hospitals, and universities. Michael Brittan is an attorney with the law firm of Stark & Stark in its Employment Litigation group, advising clients and litigating on equal employment opportunity and discrimination-based issues. The authors may be contacted at aonder@ixp- corp.com and [email protected], respectively.
    [Show full text]