Committees on Arms Export Controls: Unauthorised Disclosures of Draft Report on Use of UK- Manufactured Arms in Yemen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Committees on Arms Export Controls: Unauthorised Disclosures of Draft Report on Use of UK- Manufactured Arms in Yemen House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Committees on Arms Export Controls: unauthorised disclosures of draft Report on Use of UK- manufactured arms in Yemen Seventh Special Report of Session 2016–17 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 10 January 2017 HC 935 Published on 18 January 2017 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) (Chair) Mr John Baron MP (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour (Co-op), Preston) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Nadhim Zahawi MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/facom and in print by Order of the House. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Chris Stanton (Clerk), Nick Beech (Second Clerk), Dr Ariella Huff (Senior Committee Specialist), Ashlee Godwin and Nicholas Wade (Committee Specialists), Clare Genis (Senior Committee Assistant), James Hockaday and Su Panchanathan (Committee Assistants), and Estelle Currie (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Foreign Affairs Committee, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6105; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. CAEC: unauthorised disclosures of draft Report on Use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen 1 Contents Introduction: CAEC and its inquiry into the use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen 3 Committees on Arms Export Controls 3 Inquiry into the use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen 3 Unauthorised disclosures 4 Circumstances of the original unauthorised disclosure 4 Leak inquiry by Committees 4 Further leaks 5 Two separate Reports agreed 6 Liaison Committee consideration 6 Conclusion 7 Formal Minutes 8 CAEC: unauthorised disclosures of draft Report on Use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen 3 Introduction: CAEC and its inquiry into the use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen Committees on Arms Export Controls 1. The Committees on Arms Export Controls (CAEC), rather than being a Committee of the House, has consisted of four Select Committees meeting and working together under the terms of Standing Order No. 137A: • Business, Innovation and Skills Committee1 • Defence Committee • Foreign Affairs Committee • International Development Committee. CAEC has been chaired in this Parliament by Chris White MP, a Member of the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee. 2. The Committees have worked together since 1999 to examine the Government’s expenditure, administration and policy on strategic exports, that is, the licensing of arms exports and other controlled goods. Any Member of the four Committees has been able to attend meetings of CAEC, though in practice a smaller group of Members of the Committees has been nominated to receive papers. Since its inception, CAEC has worked principally by undertaking a single inquiry each year which typically examined exports over the preceding year and developments in export policy. Inquiry into the use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen 3. On 10 March 2016 CAEC announced an inquiry into the use of UK-manufactured arms in the conflict in Yemen. The Committees said that they would look at the size of arms sales to the Gulf region and the role the trade played in advancing UK interests there. They also intended to examine whether weapons manufactured in the UK had been used by the Royal Saudi Armed Forces in Yemen, whether any arms export licence criteria had been infringed, and what action should be taken in any such cases. CAEC took both oral and written evidence during their inquiry. 1 On 17 October 2016 this was renamed the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee to reflect changes in the machinery of Government. The membership remained the same. 4 CAEC: unauthorised disclosures of draft Report on Use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen Unauthorised disclosures Circumstances of the original unauthorised disclosure 4. An initial Chair’s draft Report on theUse of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen was circulated to the Members nominated to receive CAEC papers on Thursday 7 July. The draft Report was circulated electronically, with password protection, in line with usual practice. However CAEC was not able to meet in July with a quorum to consider this draft. 5. A revised draft Report, substantively the same as the one circulated in July, was circulated to CAEC Members on Thursday 1 September 2016, in advance of consideration of the Report at a private meeting on 7 September. Again, the draft Report was circulated electronically with password protection. The deadline for proposed amendments was 12 noon on Tuesday 6 September. An amendment paper was circulated electronically to CAEC members at 4.15pm that day. 6. On 5 September The Guardian published a story about CAEC’s planned meeting on 7 September, saying that it would “see a cross-party push for the UK to suspend its multibillion-pound arms sales to Saudi Arabia”.2 7. On the evening of Tuesday 6 September, the BBC’s Newsnight programme covered the Committees’ inquiry at some length. Substantial and accurate extracts from the draft Report were read out, and a journalist appeared to have a copy of the text of the Report. Leak inquiry by Committees 8. On 7 September, in response to the Newsnight story, the Chair of CAEC instructed the Clerk to write to all Members who had received a copy of the draft Report, asking (a) whether they or any staff had spoken to any journalist about the content of the Report, and if so, who, and (b) whether Members of staff had provided a copy of the Report, or extracts from it, to any journalist or unauthorised party. The letter was sent by email at 12.40pm with a deadline for response of 6pm that day. 9. Responses were received from all Members by the deadline. All said that they were not the source of the leak. 10. Two Members volunteered information about contacts that they had had with the media: • Douglas Chapman MP replied that nothing had been leaked from his office, adding that “I did a very guarded TV interview with RT but made it clear, while I had my own views, it was up to the Committee to reach its own conclusions with regard to the report. The interview is on my Facebook page.” • Stephen Doughty MP responded as follows: “I can confirm that the answers to your questions are a) no and b) no regarding my staff and myself. 2 See https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/sep/05/mps-to-urge-ban-on-uk-arms-sales-to-saudi-arabia CAEC: unauthorised disclosures of draft Report on Use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen 5 For absolute transparency, I have spoken to journalists from the Guardian, BBC World Service (and since the leak BBC Newsnight) about my views on the issues around Saudi Arabia and Yemen—primarily in relation to the UQ and other public stories this week/visit of the Saudi FM—and provided an *on the record* quote to the Guardian—related to the government response to the UQ on Monday—see https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/ sep/06/saudi-arabia-makes-plea-for-britain-not-to-ban-arms-sales. However—I specifically refused to comment on the content of the draft report—and in fact emphasised the parliamentary rules—and certainly have not shared it with anyone.” [Emphasis in original text.] 11. The Clerk of CAEC also wrote on 7 September to the Clerks of relevant Committees to ask if they or their staff had spoken to a journalist about the report or had provided a copy to a journalist. All responses were in the negative. Further leaks 12. The Committees met at 6pm on Wednesday 7 September to consider and agree the Report. The leak was also discussed, and the Committees agreed that the leak represented substantial interference with the inquiry. Consequently, the Committees agreed to refer the matter to the Liaison Committee for its view, in line with the procedure laid down by the House. 13. At this meeting, the four constituent Committees of CAEC did not agree the Chair’s draft Report. Instead, Members from the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee (as it was then) and the International Development Committee agreed a joint report on the Use of UK-manufactured arms in Yemen for subsequent consideration by those two Committees. 14. On 7 September BBC Newsnight again covered the inquiry and appeared to have a copy of the amendment list that had been circulated on 6 September. Again, substantial and accurate extracts from the amendment list were read out. On 8 September Newsnight covered the inquiry for a third time. The Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Crispin Blunt MP, was interviewed on this programme. The story was presented on Newsnight in a way that appeared to be designed to impugn the motives of certain Members. 15. On 8 September The Guardian published two stories covering the inquiry. These included references to the proceedings of the private meeting on 7 September, and reference to, and substantial quotations from, both the amendment paper and the original draft Report.3 16.
Recommended publications
  • (Amendment) Bill
    Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport with the agreement of Theresa Villiers, are published separately as Bill 182—EN. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill CONTENTS 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision 2 Extent, commencement and short title Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill 1 A BILL TO Prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision In section 4 of the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009— (a) in the heading, for “, commencement and sunset” substitute “and commencement”, and (b) omit subsection (7) (which provides for the Act to expire after 10 years). 5 2 Extent, commencement and short title (1) This Act extends to— (a) England and Wales, and (b) Scotland. (2) This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed. 10 (3) This Act may be cited as the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Act 2018. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill A BILL To prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council
    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Political Islam', and the Muslim Brotherhood Review
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee ‘Political Islam’, and the Muslim Brotherhood Review Sixth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 November 2016 HC 118 Published on 7 November 2016 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) (Chair) Mr John Baron MP (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour (Co-op), Preston) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Nadhim Zahawi MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) The following member was also a member of the Committee during this inquiry: Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/facom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950- 2010 Alhargan, Haya Saleh Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950-2010 by Haya Saleh AlHargan Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Middle East and Mediterranean Studies Programme King’s College University of London 2015 2 ABSTRACT This study investigates Anglo-Saudi cultural relations from 1950 to 2010, with the aim of greater understanding the nature of those relations, analysing the factors affecting them and examining their role in enhancing cultural relations between the two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's EU Accession As a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum
    James Ker-Lindsay Turkey’s EU accession as a factor in the 2016 Brexit referendum Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Ker-Lindsay James. (2017). Turkey’s EU accession as a factor in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Turkish Studies. ISSN 1468-3849. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2017.1366860 © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83691/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Turkey’s EU Accession as a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum James Ker-Lindsay European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Twitter http://www.twitter.com/JamesKerLindsay Biographical note James Ker-Lindsay is Senior Visiting Fellow at the European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science and Research Associate at the Centre for International Studies at the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Havering Council
    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Havering Council Electoral review July 2020 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2020 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why Havering? 2 Our proposals for Havering 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2 Have your
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions for Britain Outside the Eu Ralph Buckle • Tim Hewish • John C
    BREXIT DIRECTIONS FOR BRITAIN OUTSIDE THE EU RALPH BUCKLE • TIM HEWISH • JOHN C. HULSMAN IAIN MANSFIELD • ROBERT OULDS BREXIT: Directions for Britain Outside the EU BREXIT: DIRECTIONS FOR BRITAIN OUTSIDE THE EU RALPH BUCKLE TIM HEWISH JOHN C. HULSMAN IAIN MANSFIELD ROBERT OULDS First published in Great Britain in 2015 by The Institute of Economic Affairs 2 Lord North Street Westminster London SW1P 3LB in association with London Publishing Partnership Ltd www.londonpublishingpartnership.co.uk The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. Copyright © The Institute of Economic Affairs 2015 The moral right of the author has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-0-255-36682-3 (interactive PDF) Many IEA publications are translated into languages other than English or are reprinted. Permission to translate or to reprint should be sought from the Director General at the address above. Typeset in Kepler by T&T Productions Ltd www.tandtproductions.com
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Base Issue 3 - 3Fox International Ltd - 02 Sec01-16Pp - Back - AGFA XL105 CB Middle - JDF (Job Internal) - Blackcyanmagentayellow
    −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 3 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 4 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 5 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 6 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 7 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 8 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 9 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 10 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− B = B −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 12 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− C = C −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 14 −−−−−−−−−−−−− M = M −−−−−−−−−−−−− 16 WINTER 2018 WINTER 2018 ISSUE 3 ISSUE Shaping the future £1.7m has been invested in new entrances at Eastgate BASILDON · SOUTH EAST with new investment INVESTMENT AND GROWTH FOR Encompassing more than half of the retail space in the town, and with 1,350 people employed in the centre, Eastgate has consistently invested in Basildon for the benefit of the whole borough. We’ve attracted new destination retailers including Smiggle, Pandora and Accessorize - and are proud to welcome around 12 million shoppers to the centre each year. With exciting new names being lined up for 2019, including a 24-hour PureGym, we’re looking forward to a bright future. INDUSTRY OUT ON THE LESSONS FOR INNOVATIONS: TOWN: GROWTH OF LIFE: LEARNING eastgatecentre.com MODULAR HOUSING THE CENTRES AND LIVING 32 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 31 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 30 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 29 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 28 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 27 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 26 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 25 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 24 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 23 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 22 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− Z = Z −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 20 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− X = X −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 18 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− Y = Y −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 16 −−−−−−−−−−−−− M = M −−−−−−−−−−−−− 14 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− C = C −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 12 −−−−−−−−−−−−−− B = B −−−−−−−−−−−−−− 10 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 9 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 8 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 7 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 6 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
    [Show full text]