DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study of Identity, Ethics and Power in the Relationship Between Britain and the United Kingdom Overseas Territories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Study of Identity, Ethics and Power in the Relationship Between Britain and the United Kingdom Overseas Territories University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2013 Distant Relations: A Study of Identity, Ethics and Power in the Relationship Between Britain and the United Kingdom Overseas Territories Harmer, Nichola http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1575 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. DISTANT RELATIONS: A STUDY OF IDENTITY, ETHICS AND POWER IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRITAIN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OVERSEAS TERRITORIES By NICHOLA HARMER A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science December 2012 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. ABSTRACT Nichola Harmer DISTANT RELATIONS: A STUDY OF IDENTITY, ETHICS AND POWER IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRITAIN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OVERSEAS TERRITORIES This thesis contributes to new understandings of the contemporary relationship between Britain and the fourteen remaining United Kingdom Overseas Territories. By examining the discourse of social and political elites in Britain and in several Overseas Territories, it identifies the significance of the role of identity in shaping perceptions and relations between these international actors. The thesis explores how understandings of the Overseas Territories as either part of, external to, or occupying an intermediate position with regard to the British state, shapes power relations and ethical considerations in the relationship between Britain and the territories. The importance of identity in this analysis contributes empirically and theoretically to a constructivist research agenda in which inter-subjective meaning attributed to international actors holds equal weight to power and material factors. Contents List of Illustrations and Tables ................................................................................... 8 Chapter One: Introduction ....................................................................................... 11 1.1 Identity .................................................................................................................. 24 1.2 Ethics .................................................................................................................... 29 1.3 Power .................................................................................................................... 34 1.4 Summary ............................................................................................................... 39 Chapter Two: The Academic Literature.................................................................. 42 2.1 Identity in the Academic Literature on the Overseas Territories ............................. 44 2.2.1 Overseas Territories as a category ...................................................................... 45 2.2.2 Individual territories and territory groupings....................................................... 49 2.2 Ethics in the academic literature ............................................................................ 60 2.3.1 Responsibility for the Overseas Territories ......................................................... 60 2.3.2 Responsibility for biodiversity ............................................................................ 62 2.3.3 The Overseas Territories and offshore finance .................................................... 62 2.3.4 The exile of the Chagos Islanders ....................................................................... 63 2.3 Power in the Academic Literature on the Overseas Territories ............................... 64 2.3.1 The benefits of dependency ................................................................................ 64 2.3.2 Power and empowerment: tensions ..................................................................... 67 2.3.3 Voices of empowerment ..................................................................................... 68 2.4 Summary ............................................................................................................... 70 Chapter Three: Methodology ................................................................................... 72 3.1 Combining three approaches ................................................................................. 73 3.1.1 A Classical Approach ......................................................................................... 73 3.1.2. A Constructivist Approach ................................................................................ 76 3.1.3. Quantitative contributions ................................................................................. 79 3.2 Philosophy of Research ......................................................................................... 80 3.2.1 Agency ............................................................................................................... 82 3.2.2 Levels of Analysis .............................................................................................. 83 3.3 A Case Study Approach ........................................................................................ 84 3.3.1 Case Studies ....................................................................................................... 84 3.3.2 Classification of the Overseas Territories ........................................................... 85 3.3.3 Selection of Case Studies ................................................................................... 95 3.3.4 Generalising from the Case Studies .................................................................... 97 3.4 Data Collection ..................................................................................................... 98 3.4.1 Triangulation ...................................................................................................... 98 3.4.2 Official Documents ............................................................................................ 99 3.4.3 Fieldwork Interviews .......................................................................................... 99 3.4.4 Interview participants ....................................................................................... 101 3.5 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 103 3.5.1. Analysis of interview transcripts and documents ............................................. 104 3.6 Positionality and ethical considerations ............................................................... 107 3.6.1 Ethics in the research process ........................................................................... 108 3.6.2 Power and positionality .................................................................................... 111 3.7 Summary ............................................................................................................. 114 Chapter Four: British foreign policy and the Overseas Territories 1945-2012 .... 117 4.1 1945-1959: “What indeed is to be done with these places?” ................................ 118 4.1.1 Identity ............................................................................................................. 119 4.1.2 Ethics ............................................................................................................... 125 4.1.3 Power ............................................................................................................... 127 4.1.4 Summary .......................................................................................................... 132 4.2 Drawing boundaries and making bases: 1960-1979 ............................................. 132 4.2.1 Identity ............................................................................................................. 133 4.2.2 Ethics ............................................................................................................... 138 4.2.3 Power ............................................................................................................... 139 4.3 The South Atlantic: conflict and identity: 1980-1997........................................... 144 4.3.1 Identity ............................................................................................................. 144 4.3.2 Ethics ............................................................................................................... 147 4.3.3 Power ............................................................................................................... 149 4.4 White Papers and re-engagement: 1997- Present ................................................. 150 4.4.1 Identity ............................................................................................................. 151 4.4.2 Ethical issues ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council
    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Powers of the Prime Minister
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Role and powers of the Prime Minister First Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 June 2014 HC 351 Published on 24 June 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton Deane) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Mark Durkan MP (Social Democratic & Labour Party, Foyle) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) David Morris MP (Conservative, Morecambe and Lunesdale) Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons- select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/publications/ and by The Stationary Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Privy Council on Appeal from the Court of Appeal of Pitcairn Islands
    IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF PITCAIRN ISLANDS No. of 2004 BETWEEN STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN First Appellant LEN CALVIN DAVIS BROWN Second Appellant LEN CARLISLE BROWN Third Appellant DENNIS RAY CHRISTIAN Fourth Appellant CARLISLE TERRY YOUNG Fifth Appellant RANDALL KAY CHRISTIAN Sixth Appellant A N D THE QUEEN Respondent CASE FOR STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN AND LEN CARLISLE BROWN PETITIONERS' SOLICITORS: Alan Taylor & Co Solicitors - Privy Council Agents Mynott House, 14 Bowling Green Lane Clerkenwell, LONDON EC1R 0BD ATTENTION: Mr D J Moloney FACSIMILE NO: 020 7251 6222 TELEPHONE NO: 020 7251 3222 6 PART I - INTRODUCTION CHARGES The Appellants have been convicted in the Pitcairn Islands Supreme Court of the following: (a) Stevens Raymond Christian Charges (i) Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961 and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x4); (ii) Rape contrary to s14 of the Judicature Ordinance 1970 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. Sentence 4 years imprisonment (b) Len Carlisle Brown Charges Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961, the Judicature Ordinance 1970, and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x2). Sentence 2 years imprisonment with leave to apply for home detention The sentences have been suspended and the Appellants remain on bail pending the determination of this appeal. HUMAN RIGHTS In relation to human rights issues, contrary to an earlier apparent concession by the Public Prosecutor that the Human Rights Act 1978 applied to the Pitcairn Islands, it would appear not to have been extended to them, at least in so far as the necessary protocols to the Convention have not been signed to enable Pitcairners to appear before the European Court: R (Quark Fisheries Ltd) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2005] 3 WLR 7 837 (Tab ).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950- 2010 Alhargan, Haya Saleh Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950-2010 by Haya Saleh AlHargan Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Middle East and Mediterranean Studies Programme King’s College University of London 2015 2 ABSTRACT This study investigates Anglo-Saudi cultural relations from 1950 to 2010, with the aim of greater understanding the nature of those relations, analysing the factors affecting them and examining their role in enhancing cultural relations between the two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's EU Accession As a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum
    James Ker-Lindsay Turkey’s EU accession as a factor in the 2016 Brexit referendum Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Ker-Lindsay James. (2017). Turkey’s EU accession as a factor in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Turkish Studies. ISSN 1468-3849. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2017.1366860 © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83691/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Turkey’s EU Accession as a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum James Ker-Lindsay European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Twitter http://www.twitter.com/JamesKerLindsay Biographical note James Ker-Lindsay is Senior Visiting Fellow at the European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science and Research Associate at the Centre for International Studies at the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • CM8017 Human Rights and Democracy
    United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office Human Rights and Democracy: The 2010 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Report Cm 8017 £39.75 United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office Human Rights and Democracy: The 2010 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Report Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty March 2011 Cm 8017 £39.75 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Human Rights and Democracy Department Foreign and Commonwealth Office King Charles St London SW1A 2AH This publication is also available on http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/ ISBN: 9780101801720 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID: 2420077 03/11 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. CONTENTS Foreword by Foreign Secretary William Hague 4 Foreword by Minister of State Jeremy Browne 6 SECTION I: Promoting British Values 8 Democracy 10 Elections and election observation missions 10 The Westminster Foundation for Democracy 12 Human rights defenders 14 Freedom of expression 15 Criminal Justice and the Rule
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pitcairn Islands the World’S Largest Fully Protected Marine Reserve
    A fact sheet from March 2015 The Pitcairn Islands The world’s largest fully protected marine reserve Overview In March 2015, the United Kingdom declared the world’s largest fully protected marine reserve in the remote waters surrounding the Pitcairn Islands in the South Pacific Ocean. The designation marks the first time any government has combined creation of a fully protected marine area with detailed plans for surveillance and enforcement that include use of the most up-to-date technology available. This approach sets a new standard for the comprehensive monitoring of protected areas. In 2013, The Pew Charitable Trusts and The National Geographic Society joined the local government, the Pitcairn Island Council, in submitting a proposal calling for creation of a marine reserve to protect these spectacular waters. The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve spans 834,334 square kilometres (322,138 square miles). Together with the Chagos Marine Reserve in the Indian Ocean, designated in 2010, the United Kingdom has created the world’s two biggest fully protected marine areas, totalling 1,474,334 square kilometres (569,243 square miles). Through these actions, the United Kingdom—caretaker of the fifth-greatest amount of marine habitat of any country in the world—has established its place as a global leader in ocean conservation. Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve Traditional and cultural non-commercial fishing by the Pitcairn islanders and their visitors is permitted within 2 nautical miles of the summit of 40 Mile Reef and in a transit zone between Pitcairn and 40 Mile Reef. © 2015 The Pew Charitable Trusts Encompassing 99 per cent of Pitcairn’s exclusive economic zone, the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve is about 3½ times the size of the land area of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Pitcairn Islands Supreme Court T 1/2011 In
    IN THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT T 1/2011 IN THE MATTER under the Constitution of Pitcairn and the Bill of Rights 1688 AND IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to the vires of parts of the Pitcairn Constitution being ultra vires the Bill of Rights 1688 AND IN THE MATTER OF a constitutional challenge and the refusal of the Magistrates Court to refer a constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court and the failure of the Supreme Court to consider an appeal from the Magistrates Court AND CP 1/2013 IN THE MATTER OF a judicial review of the Attorney General and Governor BETWEEN MICHAEL WARREN Applicant/Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 07 to 11 and 14 to 17 April 2014; 01 August 2014; 23 September 2014 Appearances: Kieran Raftery and Simon Mount for the Crown Tony Ellis and Simon Park (on 23 September 2014) for Applicant/Appellant Judgment: 28 November 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF HAINES J ______________________________________________________________________ This judgment was delivered by me on 28 November 2014 at 10 am pursuant to the directions of Haines J Deputy Registrar Table of Contents Para Nr Introduction [1] Course of the hearing [11] The application for a stay on the grounds of abuse of process – the self- determination claim The submission [19] The right to self-determination – sources [22] Ius cogens [24] Internal self-determination – treaty obligations of the UK – the Charter of the United Nations [32] Internal self-determination – treaty obligations of the UK –
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Poggio to Retire
    PRESS RELEASE No: 130/2016 Date: 21st March 2016 Albert Poggio to Retire Albert Poggio OBE GMH will be retiring as UK Representative for HM Government of Gibraltar and Director of Gibraltar House in London, on 30th June 2016, after 28 years of distinguished service. He is the doyen of the Overseas Territories’ Representatives in the UK. Mr Poggio will remain in post through the campaign on the EU Referendum, which takes place on 23rd June, in order to continue to liaise with Members of Parliament. Albert Poggio has for many years been pivotal in liaising with both Houses of Parliament, political parties, local authorities and prominent individuals in the UK and became a well-known figure in his attendance at all the major Political Party Conferences. Albert Poggio has been HM Government of Gibraltar's Representative in the UK since 1989 and developed Gibraltar House, London, into an impressive window for Gibraltar in the City of London and throughout the UK. Importantly, Albert Poggio was crucial in Gibraltar's campaign to derail the joint sovereignty proposals by Tony Blair in 2001, which if successful, would have led to Spain and the UK sharing sovereignty of the Rock without regard to the views of the people of Gibraltar. In March 2015, Albert Poggio was awarded the Grassroot Diplomat Initiative Honouree Award for strengthening political and business ties for Gibraltarians and British citizens alike over the last 20 years. He was awarded the Gibraltar Medallion of Honour in 2014. Following his retirement, Albert Poggio will continue to work with MPs in the UK Parliament, and as Director (London) of Inward Investment, in a consultancy capacity which means that in retirement he will no longer be based at Gibraltar House.
    [Show full text]
  • Kandid a T Uppsa Ts
    Språkprogram - engelska 180 hp KANDIDAT Critically Analysing Newspaper Discourse A Study of Representation of Ideological Approaches in British Broadsheet Newspapers UPPSATS Filippa Werngren Engelska 15 hp Halmstad 2018-05-02 School of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences English Section Critically Analysing Newspaper Discourse A Study of Representation of Ideological Approaches in British Broadsheet News- papers Student: Filippa Werngren English Linguistics 61-90, 15 credits C-essay Högskolan i Halmstad/Halmstad University Supervisor: Stuart Foster Spring 2018 Abstract This is a linguistic study that focuses on language use in four British newspapers that are well known in Britain for their political positions. The main aim of this essay is to compare and con- trast different British newspapers in order to show how meaning is created and to identify any differences, depending on the discourse. To do this, specific theoretical frameworks have been applied, including critical discourse analysis, semantics, pragmatics and stylistics in the analysis of a number of different British newspapers. The analysis has shown that most of the interactions are used in all of the articles. Journalists have expressed many of the same arguments in their articles. The analysis showed that the arti- cles had many features in common and they require the reader to have a general political aware- ness as well as an understanding of the political leanings of the respective publications. It was discovered that the main difference in the articles is that they deviate from one another in how they present, interpret and relay topical and potentially controversial issues according to their leanings. The articles refer to the same stories and rely upon the same sources, but they pursue different angles, for example on national security, heritage and identity.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2017
    January 2017 ROCK TALK Issue 12 1 Contents Editorials 2 Varied Career in Law in Gibraltar 18 Chairman‟s Letter 3 News from GHT 20 Diary of Society Events 2019 4 Witham‟s Cemetery 22 Report of Events 5 Devon to Gibraltar and back 24 Annual Friends‟ visit to Gibraltar 5 Nelson‟s Table – Fact or Fiction? 27 News from the Rock (Gibraltar House) 8 Gibraltar Street Names 28 London Talks 9 Gifts from the Friends 30 Annual Seminar and AGM 10 GGPE 60th Anniversary 30 Christmas Party report 13 Out and About in Gibraltar 31 Friends‟ Donations and Projects 14 Minutes of AGM 33 Membership Secretary‟s Jottings 15 Membership Form 35 My Rock Book 16 Editorials A belated Happy New year to all members and developments, and is an interesting read. readers of this edition of Rock Talk. We wish you a prosperous 2019, and hope to 2019 promises to be an interesting year in so see you in Gibraltar at some point over the many respects but one in particular sticks out like year. a 'sore thumb'. As we pen this editorial, the British Brian & Liz Gonzalez Parliament is in turmoil and this coming Tuesday will determine the future of the United Kingdom Another busy year for the society has come and Gibraltar vis a vis our future relationship with and gone, with the full range of events and Europe. By the time you read this we will be in a support for heritage projects in Gibraltar. better (or worse) position as to this 'relationship'. This issue hopes to update the membership We hope that politicians of all political colours on the various activities, and includes unite to deliver what is best for the United Kingdom and Gibraltar.
    [Show full text]