DOCSLIB.ORG

Effective: 6/20/05 NORTH TEXAS TRAFFIC ROUTING GUIDE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effective: 6/20/05 NORTH TEXAS TRAFFIC ROUTING GUIDE Effective 05/11/2016 RAYTHEON IIS TRAFFIC ROUTING GUIDE Application: These instructions apply to all shipments where Raytheon pays freight charges. For routing instructions, questions, and special requirements (such as hazardous, classified, air-ride, or temperature- controlled shipments), see the “Traffic Contacts” table below. Rules and Requirements: • Ship collect or third party via approved primary carriers; Prepay & Add shipments are not authorized. • Do not insure or declare value on any shipment. • All shipments must be ground. Exceptions must be authorized by a Raytheon Buyer or Logistics • C.O.D. shipments will not be accepted. • Shipping instructions do not supersede terms and conditions of Raytheon SCMT (Supply Chain Management Transportation) Agreements when utilizing agreement to purchase material. “REQUIRED ROUTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL SHIPMENTS” • Raytheon will pay freight carrier specified on the Purchase Order, deviation from routing guide shall be billed back to the supplier. Declaring value on the shipment will be billed back to the supplier. • Seller must reference consignee carrier account number and Raytheon Purchase Order Number on the Airway Bill or BOL. Surface Shipments - Domestic WEIGHT: SERVICE: LOCATION: CARRIER: SECONDARY CARRIER: 1100 LBS and under (Non-Palletized) Small parcel ground United States (*Size restraints UPS FedEx apply) 100 lbs. To 10,000 LTL - Regional United States Contact Logistics Department None lbs. Time Critical Ground United States Old Dominion Freight Line None 100 lbs. To 10,000 LTL - National United States Old Dominion Freight Line FedEx Freight Priority lbs. Truck Load – General Commodities including Hazardous materials United States 2Landstar System, Inc. except 2Pilot Freight Services Over 10,000 lbs. Hazard Classes 1.1, 1.2 Or Palletized / & 1.3 Dimensional size Truck Load – Classified, Factors General Commodities and 2Landstar System, Inc. Hazardous materials United States 2Panther Expedited Services, Inc. including Hazard Classes 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 explosives Air Shipments - Domestic WEIGHT: SERVICE: LOCATION: CARRIER: Secondary Carrier Next Day and Second Day 1100 lbs. and under United States UPS FedEx Air Next Day and Second Day Over 100 lbs United States UPS Supply Chain Solutions None Air, 3rd Day Air 1 Effective 05/11/2015 Air & Ocean – International (Imports and Exports) Articles with NO ITAR/EAR Articles WITH ITAR/EAR WEIGHT: SERVICE: LOCATION: Authorization Required: Authorization Required: 1100 lbs. and under 4DHL Express 3UPS (size constraints apply) Air International 4UPS Express 4FedEx 4DHL Express Over 100 lbs. Air International 3DHL Global Forwarding 4UPS Express 4FedEx 4DHL Global Forwarding Over 100 lbs. Ocean International 3DHL Global Forwarding Follow the Exception and approval process in section 5 and 6 1 Size guidelines – Non-palletized shipments only; Maximum size is 108 inches in length and 165 inches in length and girth combined (length – plus twice the height – plus twice the width) 2 Contact the Raytheon Business Unit Traffic Department for carrier coordination with these specialized services 3 ITAR/EAR No Authorization Required Articles o No Authorization Required articles are those subject to the Department of Commerce jurisdiction which are categorized under an Export Commodity Classification Number (ECCN) or category EAR99, and to a country destination under No License Required (NLR). o No special handling is required to secure the supply chain beyond that of a normal commercial shipment. 4 ITAR/EAR Authorization Required Articles o Exports and imports (classified hardware, software, technical data, etc.) governed by an ITAR or EAR authorization – license, exception, or exemption - must utilize a Closed Network provider to transport hardware to secure the supply chain. A Closed Network is defined as logistics network where only dedicated logistics assets and personnel are used in the handling and movement of cargo from origin to destination. o All shipments paid by Raytheon must be shipped with a Raytheon approved transportation provider who has a Raytheon company wide agreement in place. The current list of eligible Closed Network providers is UPS Express, Fed Ex, and DHL Express. o Exceptions to this requirement and the corresponding approval process are identified in Section 4 and Section 5 of this guideline. Please contact your Business Freight Manage, Export/Import Operations and Compliance group, and Global Trade Organization for assistance exporting these items. o All shipments where Raytheon is the importer of record requiring US customs brokerage MUST be customs cleared by Raytheon’s Authorized Customs Broker (DHL Global Freight Forwarding or Expeditors International). o All shipments where Raytheon required to file a declaration via the Automated Export System (AES) must be completed by Raytheon’s Global Trade Organization or Raytheon’s Authorized AES filing agent (DHL Global Freight Forwarding or Expeditors International). 5 Exceptions • The following list of cases may occur where a closed network provider cannot be utilized due to customer, commodity, network, or government restrictions. In such cases Raytheon is to utilize Section 5 Exception Management Process o Customer directs a specific logistics provider who does not operate a closed network. Business Contracts will document the request for a customer directed freight forwarder and forward the business case to GTC (SC, EXIM, GTO and the Authorization Owner must be copied on the request) for approval. Once the approval is obtained, SC will execute a companywide agreement with the customer–directed freight forwarder. o Customer directs the use of specific airline that prohibits the use of a closed network. o Cargo that exceeds the weight or size limits of the closed network provider o Foreign Country restriction on closed network provider movement of military hardware or high value goods. o Hazmat freight exceptions of the closed network providers (i.e. Class 1 cargo (explosives), Class 2 cargo (gases), and Class 7 cargo (radioactive)) o Classified Cargo which follows classified transportation plan approved by DSS. o DoD Directed or Regulated Shipments including FMS o Articles with ITAR/EAR Authorizations not implemented with appropriate forwarder or country 6 Exception Management Process • If the use of a closed network provider is not possible due to exceptions listed in Section 4, a Shipment Routing Plan must be documented by Raytheon and the nominated logistics provider and approved by a BU logistics director (or defined designee). • The logistics routing plan will define all of the handoffs and parties to the transaction from origin to the destination. • The BU logistics director (or defined designee) will review the routing, the parties, and the process in the movement and handling of the transactions to determine if the shipment routing plan possess a risk of lost freight. • If the BU logistics director (or defined designee) determines the plan possess too high a risk, they will request an alternative plan be proposed by the freight forwarders for review and approval prior to approving shipment execution. 2 Effective 05/11/2016 Carrier Customer Service Numbers CARRIER NAME CARRIER PHONE NUMBER UPS 1-800-877-1497 DHL Global Forwarding 1-800-426-5962 Old Dominion Freight Line 1-800-235-5569 FedEx Freight Priority 1-800-463-3339 UPS Supply Chain Solutions 1-800-443-6379 Landstar Systems, Inc. 1-800-872-9400 Panther Expedited Services, Inc. 1-800-350-8783 Pilot Freight Services 1-800-447-4568 IIS Logistics Site Contacts SITES NAME E-MAIL PHONE # All Tuan Nguyen [email protected] 972-664-6565 All Jim Gray [email protected] 972-664-6569 All Betty Keck [email protected] 972-664-6568 All Rayborn Long [email protected] 972-664-6566 All Steve Ponting [email protected] 310-647-3669 Suppliers needing shipping instructions please contact the Raytheon POC listed above. For IIS Freight Carrier Accounts contact Betty Keck at 972-664-6568 or [email protected] 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Holiday Last Day to Ship
    2021 Shipping deadlines for holiday packages Last days to ship U.S. to U.S. Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri FedEx Express® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Same Day® FO, PO, SO, Extra Hours 2Day & 2Day AM FedEx Express Saver® FedEx 1Day® Freight 12/19 FedEx 2Day® Freight FedEx 3Day® Freight FedEx Ground® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Ground® Contiguous US FedEx Ground® Alaska and Hawaii FedEx Home Delivery® Contiguous US FedEx Home Delivery® Alaska and Hawaii FedEx Ground® Economy FedEx Freight® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Freight® Priority FedEx Freight® Economy FedEx Freight® Direct International Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri U.S. to Canada 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx® International Next Flight FedEx International First® FedEx International Priority® FedEx International Priority Distribution® FedEx International Economy® U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
    Case 3:15-cv-01550-JAM Document 120 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CARLOS TAVERAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, C.A. No. 3:15-cv-01550-JAM v. XPO LAST MILE, INC. Defendant. XPO LAST MILE, INC. Third-Party Plaintiff, v. EXPEDITED TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC. Third-Party Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S ASSENTED-TO MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated delivery drivers who performed delivery services for Defendant XPO Last Mile, Inc. in Connecticut pursuant to standard contracts under which they were classified as independent contractors. Plaintiff alleges that XPO’s delivery contractors were actually employees, and based on this misclassification, XPO’s practice of making deductions from its delivery drivers’ pay for such things as damage claims and worker’s compensation violates the Connecticut wage payments laws. Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31-71e. The parties have reached a non-reversionary class action settlement for $950,000. 1 Case 3:15-cv-01550-JAM Document 120 Filed 06/27/17 Page 2 of 45 On March 17, 2017, the Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, certified a class of individuals who performed delivery services for Defendant XPO Last Mile, Inc. in Connecticut pursuant to contracts that class them as independent contractors, and authorized notice to the class. ECF No. 115. Plaintiff now seeks the Court’s final approval of the proposed class action settlement at the final settlement approval hearing scheduled for July 7, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Fedex Express Hybrid-Electric Delivery Trucks
    VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Project Results: Evaluating FedEx Express Hybrid-Electric Delivery Trucks The National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) Fleet Test and Evaluation Team evaluated the 12-month, in-service performance of three Class 4 gasoline hybrid-electric delivery trucks and three comparable conventional diesel trucks operated by FedEx Express in Southern California. In addition, the tailpipe emissions and fuel economy of one of the gasoline hybrid-electric vehicles (gHEVs) and one diesel truck were tested on a chassis dynamometer. The gHEVs were equipped with a parallel hybrid system manufactured by Azure FedEx Express’s gasoline hybrid-electric delivery trucks Dynamics, including a 100-kW alternating current induction demonstrated lower tailpipe emissions compared with conventional motor, regenerative braking, and a 2.45-kWh nickel-metal- diesel delivery trucks. Courtesy of Sam Snyder, FedEx Express hydride battery pack. This fact sheet summarizes the results of the evaluation of the gHEVs. This technology evaluation was part of a collaborative effort In-Service Testing co-funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Three routes served by gHEVs and three served by Vehicle Technologies Program and the South Coast Air conventional diesel trucks were selected for the evaluation, Quality Management District (SCAQMD) via CALSTART. which took place from April 2009 to April 2010. The gHEVs The in-use technology evaluation was conducted by NREL were moved to the initial diesel routes after 6 months of and primarily sponsored by DOE. The chassis dynamometer evaluation, while the diesel trucks were moved to the initial testing was conducted by NREL and primarily funded by gHEV routes.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Codes of Conduct L-R 2018.Pdf
    Produced by the Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University www.bentley.edu/cbe Codes of Conduct: L-R L Brands L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. L’Oreal Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings Lam Research Lamar Advertising Company Land O’ Lakes, Inc. Landstar System, Inc. Las Vegas Sands Corp. Lear Corporation Legg Mason, Inc. Leggett & Platt, Incorporated Leidos Holdings Lennar Corp. Lennox International, Inc. Leucadia National Level 3 Communications, Inc. Levi Strauss Lexmark International, Inc. Liberty Interactive Corporation Liberty Media Corporation Lifepoint Hospitals Lincoln Electric Holdings Lincoln National Corporation LinkedIn Linn Energy Lithia Motors, Inc. Live Nation Entertainment LKQ Lockheed Martin Loews Corporation Lorillard, Inc. Lowe's Companies, Inc. LPL Financial Holding Lubrizol M&T Bank Corporation Macy's Magellan Health Services, Inc. Magellan Midstream Partners Manitowoc Manpower Inc. Produced by the Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University www.bentley.edu/cbe ManTech International Marathon Oil Corporation Marathon Petroleum Corporation Markel Corporation MarkWest Energy Partners Marriott International, Inc. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Masco Corporation Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company MasTec, Inc. MasterCard Mattel Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. McCormick & Company, Incorporated McDermott McDonald's Corporation McGraw Hill Financial McKesson Corporation MDU Resources Group, Inc. Mead Johnson Nutrition Medical Mutual of Ohio Mednax Medtronic Men’s Wearhouse Merchants Bancshares, Inc. Merck Mercury General Corp Meredith Corporation Meritage Home Meritor, Inc. Metaldyne Performance Group MetLife MetroPCS Communications Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. MGM Resorts International Michaels Companies, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. Microsoft Corporation Mitre Mohawk Industries, Inc. Molina Healthcare Produced by the Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University www.bentley.edu/cbe Molson Coors Brewing Company Momentive Specialty Chemicals Mondelez International, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Trucking & Logistics Report
    TRUCKING & LOGISTICS REPORT THIRD QUARTER 2019 Bridgepoint Investment Banking is a division of Bridgepoint Holdings, LLC. Securities offered through an unaffiliated entity, M&A Securities Group, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. This entity is not affiliated or associated with, authorized or sponsored by Bridgepoint Advisers Limited TRUCKING & LOGISTICS INDUSTRY UPDATE Q3 2019 bridgepointib.com BRIDGEPOINT INSIGHTS Volatility in the Truckload Freight Market; Stability on the Horizon EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BIG PICTURE Trucking company median EBITDA Trucking company valuations and valuation multiples are currently at earnings are highly cyclical due to the 6.3x, near historical norms and well in nature of the industry and general excess of trough levels macroeconomic factors as well as Year-over-year truckload demand specific business characteristics has remained static, but carriers added too much capacity to capture the peak freight rates in 2018. Spot Cycle timing is critical to maximize market rates declined rapidly as a transaction value. Recent decline of 3.1x result while contract rates remained (32.6%) of public trucking companies’ flat – capacity utilization has receded, median TEV / EBTIDA multiple since and the driver shortage has increased September 2018 indicates that the slightly industry remains in the late stages of the Though there was solid growth with cycle private fleets, many for-hire trucking firms were down in the first-half of 2019, particularly small companies Bridgepoint Investment Banking advises trucking company owners seeking
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Carrier Code List
    Massachusetts Carrier Code List UPS Standard Billing Billing Collect/3rd party (account # required) U01 UPS Next Day 3rd party address also required* U04 UPS 2nd Day CL1 UPS Next Day Collect U10 UPS 3 Day Residential CL2 UPS 2nd Day Collect U11 UPS 3 Day Commercial CL3 UPS 3 Day Collect U25 UPS Ground Commercial CLT UPS Ground Collect U26 UPS Ground Residential UTP UPS Ground Third Party* U60 UPS Early A.M. UT1 UPS Next Day Third Party * UT2 UPS 2nd Day Third Party* UPS International Billing Collect/3rd party (account # required) U08 UPS Standard Canada 3rd party address also required* U09 UPS Worldwide Express U48 UPS Standard Collect/3rd Party (Canada)* U49 UPS Worldwide Express Collect/Third Party* FedEx Domestic Standard Billing Billing Collect/3rd party R02 FedEx Ground Commercial R05 FedEx Ground Third Party (account # required) R03 FedEx Ground Residential R07 FedEx Ground Collect F01 FedEx Priority Overnight RRP FedEx Ground Bill Recipient (account # required) F02 FedEx Standard Overnight F10 FedEx Priority Overnight Collect F03 FedEx 2 Day F12 FedEx Priority Overnight Third Party F04 FedEx Express Saver F20 FedEx Standard Overnight Collect F05 FedEx Express Saver Residential F22 FedEx Standard Overnight Third Party F13 FedEx 2 Day Residential F30 FedEx 2 Day Collect F50 FedEx 1st Overnight F33 FedEx 2 Day Third Party International Standard Billing Billing Collect/3rd party (account # required) R04 FedEx Ground Canada F7C FedEx International Priority Collect R09 FedEx Ground Collect Canada F7T FedEx International Priority Third
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick W. Smith Fedex Chairman and CEO Frederick W. Smith Is
    Frederick W. Smith FedEx Chairman and CEO Frederick W. Smith is chairman and chief executive officer of FedEx Corp., a $75 billion global transportation, business services, technology, and logistics company serving more than 220 countries and territories. Smith is responsible for providing strategic direction for all of FedEx Corp. and its operating companies, including FedEx Express, FedEx Ground, FedEx Freight, FedEx Logistics, FedEx Office, and FedEx Services. Since founding FedEx in 1971, he has been an active proponent of regulatory reform, free trade, and “open skies agreements” for aviation around the world. Smith is co-chairman of the Energy Security Leadership Council, a trustee for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and a member of the Business Roundtable and The Business Council. He served as chairman of the US-China Business Council and is co-chairman of the French-American Business Council. He has also served on the boards of several large public companies and on the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and Mayo Foundation boards. He was formerly chairman of the Board of Governors for the International Air Transport Association and the U.S. Air Transport Association. Smith has received numerous civic, academic, and business awards, including the Global Leadership Award from the U.S.-India Business Council, the George C. Marshall Foundation Award, the Atlantic Council’s Distinguished Business Leadership Award, and the Circle of Honor Award from the Congressional Medal of Honor Foundation. In addition, he is a member of the Aviation Hall of Fame, served as co-chairman of both the U.S. World War II Memorial Project and the campaign for the National Museum of the Marine Corps, was cited in Forbes “100 Greatest Living Business Minds,” and was named a top CEO by Barron’s and Chief Executive magazines.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation & Logistics Industry Update
    TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS INDUSTRY UPDATE │ FEBRUARY 2016 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. 0 TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS INDUSTRY UPDATE │ FEBRUARY 2016 WHAT WE’RE READING CONTENTS LOGISTICS | ADDRESSING FUTURE DEMAND LEVELS NOW . M&A TRANSACTIONS Increased variation in what buyers require at a given time means it is no longer . PUBLIC MARKETS OVERVIEW sufficient to rely on traditional baseline ordering patterns. Meeting demand on a . STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE more consistent basis therefore requires complex stock management systems, building and maintaining key relationships throughout the supply chain and a . OUR GROUP review of the triggers that influence buying behavior. Recent years have seen a concerted focus on suppliers adopting more products lines – both in terms of volume and variation – in order to react quickly to the demands of buyers, which can often come at a moment’s notice. CONTACTS Supply Chain Digital UNITED STATES TRUCKING | LOGISTICS CHIEF EXPECTS TRUCKERS TO ADAPT TO NEW RULES Frank Mountcastle Logistics provider C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. says the trucking industry should Managing Director [email protected] absorb new federal safety regulations with relative ease despite sharp divisions +1 (804) 915-0124 among trucking companies over the rules. The requirement for electronic logging devices and restrictions on driving hours for truck drivers will raise costs for some Jason Bass smaller trucking companies, John Wiehoff, the company’s chief executive, said in Managing Director an earnings conference call with analysts on Wednesday.
    [Show full text]
  • United Parcel Service-Federal Express-National Labor Relations
    United Parcel Service-Federal Express-National Labor Relations Act-Railway Labor Act-Union Employee-Independent Contractor- FedEx-Current Developments of the Legal Status of FedEx Workers- and the Trend of Employers Classifying Employees as Independent Contractors Richard Trotter University of Baltimore UPS and FedEx are both package delivery services, however UPS workers are considered employees under the National Labor Relations Act and are represented by the Teamsters Union. FedEx, which began as an air delivery service is under the jurisdiction of the Railway Labor Act. In recent years, FedEx management has restructured its relationships with its workers in such a way as to classify them as independent contractors. Legislative actions on both the state and federal level have sought to impose stricter scrutiny on employers classifying their employees as independent contractors. INTRODUCTION The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) was originally enacted in 1935. Since its original enactment the law has been amended twice, in 1947 with the enactment of the Taft-Hartley Act and again in 1959 with the enactment of the Landrum-Griffin Act. The basic philosophic underpinnings of the law is that it protects a worker’s right to organize into labor Unions, and once organized workers can seek to be represented by a union through the election process administered by the NLRB. Once a union is chosen, the employer has a duty to engage in collective bargaining with the union elected by the employees. In 1926 the Railway Labor Act was enacted originally to govern labor relations in the railway industry. The purpose behind the law was to ensure the smooth running of the railroads without labor disruptions particularly in times of war or other national crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Fedex Express Hydrogen Fuel Cell Extended-Range Battery Electric Vehicles
    MT017: FedEx Express Hydrogen Fuel Cell Extended-Range Battery Electric Vehicles Phillip C Galbach June 15, 2018 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Program Overview Hydrogen Fuel Cell Extended-Range Battery Electric Vehicles Demonstration • $3.0 million from Department of Energy • Integration of fuel cells into 20 battery electric pickup and delivery vehicles, PUDs – BP1 – 1 truck • Design • Integrate & test fuel cell systems – Safety – Communication – Performance – Reliability • Validate in revenue service – BP2 – 19 trucks • Integrate hydrogen fuel cell systems • Operate in revenue service in Memphis, TN and locations in CA Project Main Objectives Program Overview Timeline Barriers • Grant awarded – October 2015 • Unknown ability to meet safety, • Kickoff meeting – May 2016 performance & reliability needs • Project end – October 2020 • Variable energy requirements • Project completion - < 5% – Route differences – Phase 1 – 99.9% complete – Parasitic losses (HVAC, ancillary systems, effects of temperature) Budget • Fuel availability • DOE – $3.0M • Partners – $3.367M Partners • U.S. Department of Energy • FedEx Express – Prime recipient • Plug Power – Fuel cell manufacturer • Workhorse Group – Truck manufacturer Relevance: DOE Strategy DOE Goals • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy – Fuel Cell Technology Office • Provide clean, safe, secure, affordable and reliable energy • Diverse domestic resources, provides energy security, reduces petroleum use, lower
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Percent of Revenue by Industry
    J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. 2019 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING, PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT With more than 58 years of experience, J.B. Hunt continues to raise the expectations for companies in transportation and logistics. The company was founded by an entrepreneur which created a culture that places innovation at its core. Over the past few years, J.B. Hunt has taken unprecedented approaches to tackle some of the industry’s biggest challenges, such as uncovering new available capacity, improving the day-to-day experience for truck drivers, and enhancing its trucking fl eet to continue being one of the safest on the road. Table of Contents Letter to our Stockholders and Employees 3 Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders 8 Proxy Statement 9 Proxy Summary 9 Proposal Number One – Election of Directors 22 Information About the Board 22 Nominees for Director 23 Director Compensation 28 Executive Officers of the Company 30 Security Ownership of Management 31 Corporate Governance 33 Audit Committee 40 Executive Compensation Committee 41 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee 42 Principal Stockholders of the Company 44 Executive Compensation 45 Compensation Discussion and Analysis 45 Process of Setting Compensation 48 2019 Compensation 54 Summary Compensation 61 Grants of Plan-Based Awards 62 Outstanding Equity Awards at Calendar Year-end 64 Restricted Share Units Vested 66 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation 67 Potential Post-Employment Benefits 68 CEO Pay Ratio 69 Report of the Executive Compensation Committee 71 Proposal Number Two – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation 72 Report of the Audit Committee 74 Proposal Number Three – Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 75 Proposal Number Four – Stockholder Proposal Regarding Reporting Political Contributions 78 Proposal Number Five – Stockholder Proposal Seeking a Report on Climate Change Initiatives 81 Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting 86 J.B.
    [Show full text]