DOCSLIB.ORG

JOINTS and MUSCLES of the DORSAL FIN of TILAPIA NILOTICA L. (FAM. CICHLIDAE). by P. J. GEERLINK and J. J. VIDELER (Zoological La

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JOINTS and MUSCLES of the DORSAL FIN of TILAPIA NILOTICA L. (FAM. CICHLIDAE). by P. J. GEERLINK and J. J. VIDELER (Zoological La JOINTS AND MUSCLES OF THE DORSAL FIN OF TILAPIA NILOTICA L. (FAM. CICHLIDAE). by P. J. GEERLINK AND J. J. VIDELER (ZoologicalLaboratory, Universityof Groningen,The Netherlands) SUMMARY The dorsal fin of the teleost fish Tilapia nilotica is described, emphasizing the joints of the spines and soft rays. Both kinds of joints are composed of the same basic elements. In the spine joint one axis of movement is present; in the soft ray joint there are two axes perpendicular to each other. An account is given of the musculature of the dorsal fin. Separate muscles are distinguished, situated between the inclinator muscles of the spines, for which the name interinclinatorial muscles is introduced. Their function is not clear. INTRODUCTION There are many publications describing the comparative anatomy of the dorsal fins of teleost fishes. A number of questions, however, concerning the immediate relation between structure and movements of the fin remain unclarified. In order to elucidate this kind of problem attention should be focussed on the fin structure and movement of one single species. Only a few authors have done this (e.g. HOOGLAND, 1951, who investigated the fixing mechanism of the dorsal spines of Gasterosteus aculeatus). The aim of this paper is to describe and compare some anatomical details of the two parts of the dorsal fin of Tilapia nilotica. Many Per- ciform fishes have dorsal fins consisting of two different parts or even two different fins occur. Tilapia nilotica has one single dorsal fin; the rostral part containing spiny rays and having restricted movability; the caudal part having flexible, segmented, soft rays, which can move in different directions. The joints between the rays and their supporting elements will receive special attention, as their structure is an impor- tant factor in limiting the potential of movement. MATERIAL AND METHODS S For dissections, fishes preserved in formalin, as well as frozen animals were used. Their size varied from 15 to 30 cm. Median and transverse sections were prepared from frozen fishes of about 10 to 15 cm in length, after decalcification in 5% nitric acid, fixation in Bouin solu- 280 tion and embedding in paraffine. The sections were cut at a thickness of 7 [1.m and stained according to the azan method. From these schema- tical drawings were made (Figs 5, 6, 7, 9, 10). To elucidate the possible movements of some structures simple three dimensional diagrams were drawn in which the relevant anatomical details were outlined. ' RESULTS S The skeleton a. General features, nomenclature The formula of the dorsal fin of Tilapia nilotica is D (XV)XVI-XVII (XVIII)/11-15 (STERBA, 1968). The rays are supported by a row of pterygiophores (Fig. 1), situated between the vertebral column and the fin base. These rays articulate in a joint at the distal end of the pterygiophores. Each pterygiophore has developed from three cartilagi- nous elements (only two in Cichlidae, according to FRANÇOIS, 1959) : the proximal, mesial and distal radial (EATEN, 1945). During the ontog- TABLE I Names and descriptions of ray support skeleton, commonly found in literature whole ray support proximalpart distal part of ray support of ray support Fig. 1. Skeleton of dorsal fin. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Median Fin Patterning in Bony Fish: Caspase-3 Role in Fin Fold Reabsorption
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors College 2017 Median Fin Patterning in Bony Fish: Caspase-3 Role in Fin Fold Reabsorption Kaitlyn Ann Hammock Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Median fin patterning in bony fish: caspase-3 role in fin fold reabsorption BY Kaitlyn Ann Hammock UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for obtaining UNDERGRADUATE DEPARTMENTAL HONORS Department of Biological Sciences along with the HonorsCollege at EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Charleston, Illinois 2017 I hereby recommend this thesis to be accepted as fulfilling the thesis requirement for obtaining Undergraduate Departmental Honors Date '.fHESIS ADVI 1 Date HONORSCOORDmATOR f C I//' ' / ·12 1' J Date, , DEPARTME TCHAIR Abstract Fish larvae develop a fin fold that will later be replaced by the median fins. I hypothesize that finfold reabsorption is part of the initial patterning of the median fins,and that caspase-3, an apoptosis marker, will be expressed in the fin fold during reabsorption. I analyzed time series of larvae in the first20-days post hatch (dph) to determine timing of median findevelopment in a basal bony fish- sturgeon- and in zebrafish, a derived bony fish. I am expecting the general activation pathway to be conserved in both fishesbut, the timing and location of cell death to differ.The dorsal fin foldis the firstto be reabsorbed in the sturgeon starting at 2 dph and rays formed at 6dph. This was closely followed by the anal finat 3 dph, rays at 9 dph and only later, at 6dph, does the caudal fin start forming and rays at 14 dph.
    [Show full text]
  • Bony Fish Guide
    This guide will help you to complete the Bony Fish Observation Worksheet. Bony Fish Guide Fish (n.) An ectothermic (cold-blooded) vertebrate (with a backbone) aquatic (lives in water) animal that moves with the help of fins (limbs with no fingers or toes) and breathes with gills. This definition might seem very broad, and that is because fish are one of the most diverse groups of animals on the planet—there are a lot of fish in the sea (not to mention rivers, lakes and ponds). In fact, scientists count at least 32,000 species of fish—more than any other type of vertebrate. Fish are split into three broad classes: Jawless Fish Cartilaginous Fish Bony Fish (hagfish, lampreys, etc.) (sharks, rays, skates, etc.) (all other fish) This guide will focus on the Bony Fish. There are at least 28,000 species of bony fish, and they are found in almost every naturally occurring body of water on the planet. Bony fish range in size: • Largest: ocean sunfish (Mola mola), 11 feet, over 5,000 pounds • Smallest: dwarf pygmy goby (Pandaka pygmaea), ½ inch, a fraction of an ounce (This image is life size.) The following guide will help you learn more about the bony fish you can find throughout the New England Aquarium. Much of the guide is keyed to the Giant Ocean Tank, but can be applied to many kinds of fish. Even if you know nothing about fish, you can quickly learn a few things: The shape of a fish’s body, the position of its mouth and the shape of its tail can give you many clues as to its behavior and adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Knowledge on the European Mudminnow, Umbra Krameri Walbaum, 1792 (Pisces: Umbridae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 1995 Band/Volume: 97B Autor(en)/Author(s): Wanzenböck Josef Artikel/Article: Current knowledge on the European mudminnow, Umbra krameri Walbaum, 1792 (Pisces: Umbridae). 439-449 ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 97 B 439 - 449 Wien, November 1995 Current knowledge on the European mudminnow, Umbra krameri WALBAUM, 1792 (Pisces: Umbridae) J. Wanzenböck* Abstract The present paper summarizes the current knowledge on the European mudminnow {Umbra krameri WALBAUM, 1792) with respect to systematics, taxonomy, and ecology. Key words: Umbridae, Umbra krameri, systematics, taxonomy, ecology. Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Arbeit faßt den derzeitigen Wissensstand über den Europäischen Hundsfisch {Umbra kra- meri WALBAUM, 1792) unter Berücksichtigung systematischer, taxonomischer und ökologischer Aspekte zusammen. Names, taxonomy, and systematics Scientific name: Umbra krameri WALBAUM, 1792 Common names: Based on BLANC & al. (1971) and LINDBERG & HEARD (1972). Names suggested by the author are given at first, those marked with an asterix (*) are given in BLANC & al. (1971). German: Europäischer Hundsfisch, Hundsfisch*, Ungarischer Hundsfisch Hungarian: Lâpi póc* Czech: Tmavec hnëdy*, Blatnâk tmavy Slovak: Blatniak* Russian: Evdoshka, Umbra* Ukrainian: Boboshka (Dniestr), Evdoshka, Lezheboka
    [Show full text]
  • I Ecomorphological Change in Lobe-Finned Fishes (Sarcopterygii
    Ecomorphological change in lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii): disparity and rates by Bryan H. Juarez A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2015 Master’s Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Lauren C. Sallan, University of Pennsylvania, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Daniel L. Rabosky, Co-Chair Associate Research Scientist Miriam L. Zelditch i © Bryan H. Juarez 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Rabosky Lab, David W. Bapst, Graeme T. Lloyd and Zerina Johanson for helpful discussions on methodology, Lauren C. Sallan, Miriam L. Zelditch and Daniel L. Rabosky for their dedicated guidance on this study and the London Natural History Museum for courteously providing me with access to specimens. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF APPENDICES v ABSTRACT vi SECTION I. Introduction 1 II. Methods 4 III. Results 9 IV. Discussion 16 V. Conclusion 20 VI. Future Directions 21 APPENDICES 23 REFERENCES 62 iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE/FIGURE II. Cranial PC-reduced data 6 II. Post-cranial PC-reduced data 6 III. PC1 and PC2 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 11-12 III. Cranial Disparity Through Time 13 III. Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 14 III. Cranial/Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 15 v LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Lobe-fins 24 B. Species Used In Analysis 34 C. Cranial and Post-Cranial Landmarks 37 D. PC3 and PC4 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 38 E. PC1 PC2 Cranial Morphospaces 39 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamics of Balistiform Swimming in the Picasso
    HYDRODYNAMICS OF BALISTIFORM SWIMMING IN THE PICASSO TRIGGERFISH, RHINECANTHUS ACULEATUS by HALE LOOFBOURROW BSc. University of British Columbia, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Zoology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (VANCOUVER) January 2009 © Hale Loofbourrow, 2009 ii Abstract Aquatic propulsion by means of undulatory movements of the median (dorsal and anal) fins is the primary mode of transport for the Picasso triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus). Known as balistiform locomotion, this form of propulsion is an adaptation for highly efficient movement within complex environments such as coral reefs. A principle component of balistiform locomotion has been the development of momentum enhancement, a fin-force multiplier that increases swimming efficiency. This study examines the kinematics and energetics of balistiform locomotion employing theoretical models of thrust, power, and efficiency. Thrust and power were calculated and compared with theoretical values modeled by Lighthill and Blake (1990). This model has heretofore not been thoroughly vetted and was tested for accuracy and applicability. Thrust force was estimated from resistance (drag) using a vertical dead drop to determine terminal velocity; power was calculated from oxygen consumption measurements at different speeds. The Lighthill and Blake (1990) model requires median fin kinematics (frequency, wavelength, amplitude, wave angle), which were measured from high-speed videography and followed statistically predicted trends with frequency being the dominant variable, and the others changing little or not at all with speed. Momentum enhancement was found to be 3.6, close to Lighthill and Blake’s (1990) theoretically predicted value of 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Shark Fins: Silky and Threshers Fin Landmarks Used in This Guide
    Identifying Shark Fins: Silky and Threshers Fin landmarks used in this guide Apex Trailing edge Leading edge Origin Free rear tip Fin base Shark fins Caudal fin First dorsal fin This image shows the positions of the fin types that are highly prized in trade: the first dorsal, paired Second dorsal fin pectoral fins and the lower lobe of the caudal fin. The lower lobe is the only part of the caudal fin that is valuable in trade (the upper lobe is usually discarded). Second dorsal fins, paired pelvic fins and Lower caudal lobe anal fins, though less valuable, also occur in trade. Pectoral fins The purpose of this guide In 2012, researchers in collaboration with Stony Brook University and The Pew Charitable Trusts developed a comprehensive guide to help wildlife inspectors, customs agents, and fisheries personnel provisionally identify the highly distinctive first dorsal fins of five shark species recently listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES): the oceanic whitetip, three species of hammerhead, and the porbeagle. Since then, over 500 officials from dozens of countries have been trained on how to use key morphological characteristics outlined in the guide to quickly distinguish fins from these CITES listed species amongst fins of non-CITES listed species during routine inspections. The ability to quickly and reliably identify fins in their most commonly traded form (frozen and/or dried and unprocessed) to the species level provides governments with a means to successfully implement the CITES listing of these shark species and allow for legal, sustainable trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Identification
    Fish Identification Soft ray Spiny and soft ray dorsal fins Pectoral Pelvic fin fin “Lower” fish “Higher” fish Fins are conspicuous features of the fish body and can be used to identify groups of fish. The position of the pectoral and pelvic fins can vary greatly among families of fish. The pectoral fins of primitive or lower bony fishes tend to be placed low on the body whereas the position is more versatile in the higher fishes and tends to be located higher on the fish. This aids in their functionality and can be used in locomotion, turning, braking and aggressive displays. Eel-shaped fish have less prominent pectoral fins. The pelvic fins are generally smaller and more restricted in function. They tend to be positioned near the anal fin in the lower fish and placed below or a little behind the pectoral fins in the higher fish. The dorsal fin(s) may extend the length of the back, be divided into two or three separate fins, or be single and small. In some groups (Salmonids and some catfish) there is a small, fleshy adipose dorsal fin. In the higher bony fishes, the anterior part of the dorsal, or the first dorsal if there are two, is supported by spines. The anal fin is generally short-based but some species have anal fins that are long or longer than the dorsal fins, such as the burbot (Lota lota). The caudal fins appear in a variety of shapes and sizes and often reflect evolutionary levels and relationships more than other fins.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematics of Ribbonfin Locomotion in the Bowfin, Amia Calva
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Kinematics of Ribbon‐Fin Locomotion in the Bowfin, Amia calva 1,2 KEVIN JAGNANDAN * AND CHRISTOPHER P. SANFORD1 1Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 2Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, California ABSTRACT An elongated dorsal and/or anal ribbon‐fin to produce forward and backward propulsion has independently evolved in several groups of fishes. In these fishes, fin ray movements along the fin generate a series of waves that drive propulsion. There are no published data on the use of the dorsal ribbon‐fin in the basal freshwater bowfin, Amia calva. In this study, frequency, amplitude, wavelength, and wave speed along the fin were measured in Amia swimming at different speeds (up to 1.0 body length/sec) to understand how the ribbon‐fin generates propulsion. These wave properties were analyzed to (1) determine whether regional specialization occurs along the ribbon‐ fin, and (2) to reveal how the undulatory waves are used to control swimming speed. Wave properties were also compared between swimming with sole use of the ribbon‐fin, and swimming with simultaneous use of the ribbon and pectoral fins. Statistical analysis of ribbon‐fin kinematics revealed no differences in kinematic patterns along the ribbon‐fin, and that forward propulsive speed in Amia is controlled by the frequency of the wave in the ribbon‐fin, irrespective of the contribution of the pectoral fin. This study is the first kinematic analysis of the ribbon‐fin in a basal fish and the model species for Amiiform locomotion, providing a basis for understanding ribbon‐fin locomotion among a broad range of teleosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Experimental Hydrodynamics of Fish Fin Control Surfaces George V
    556 IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, VOL. 29, NO. 3, JULY 2004 Morphology and Experimental Hydrodynamics of Fish Fin Control Surfaces George V. Lauder and Eliot G. Drucker Abstract—Over the past 520 million years, the process of evo- lution has produced a diversity of nearly 25 000 species of fish. This diversity includes thousands of different fin designs which are largely the product of natural selection for locomotor performance. Fish fins can be grouped into two major categories: median and paired fins. Fins are typically supported at their base by a series of segmentally arranged bony or cartilaginous elements, and fish have extensive muscular control over fin conformation. Recent experimental hydrodynamic investigation of fish fin func- tion in a diversity of freely swimming fish (including sharks, stur- geon, trout, sunfish, and surfperch) has demonstrated the role of fins in propulsion and maneuvering. Fish pectoral fins generate either separate or linked vortex rings during propulsion, and the lateral forces generated by pectoral fins are of similar magnitudes to thrust force during slow swimming. Yawing maneuvers involve differentiation of hydrodynamic function between left and right fins via vortex ring reorientation. Low-aspect ratio pectoral fins in Fig. 1. Photograph of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) showing the sharks function to alter body pitch and induce vertical maneuvers configuration of median and paired fins in a representative spiny-finned fish. through conformational changes of the fin trailing edge. The dorsal fin of fish displays a diversity of hydrodynamic function, from a discrete thrust-generating propulsor acting I. INTRODUCTION independently from the body, to a stabilizer generating only side forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Characteristics Fact Sheet, Great Lakes Fish Family Cards and Generic
    Fish family cards Fish family Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra www.greatlakeslessons.com MICHU-07-406 COPY MASTER Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Fish family cards www.greatlakeslessons.com MICHU-07-406 COPY MASTER Fish family id card guide for teachers Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Chinook salmon Round goby Burbot Pike Lake sturgeon Walleye Smallmouth bass Black bullhead Illustration: E. Damstra Illustration: E. Damstra Yellow perch Longnose Sucker Sea lamprey Lake whitefish Illustrations: E. Damstra Note: Fish size not to scale Generic fish Graphic: characteristics of fish www.greatlakeslessons.com MICHU-07-406 COPY MASTER This graphic is a composite illustration that shows a variety of distinguishing characteristics. Scientists use these and many other characteristics to correctly classify and identify fish. dorsal fins adipose fin snout caudal (tail) fin mouth anal fin barbels pectoral fin pelvic fin Fish Species & Habitat Cards - Teacher Master www.greatlakeslessons.com MICHU-07-406 COPY MASTER Salmon and Trout Family, Salmonidae Illustration: E. Damstra Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha n Native to Pacific Ocean from southern California to Alaska. n Introduced to Great Lakes in 1967. n Habitat: Deep open waters of the Great Lakes. Spawns in tributaries in autumn. Fish Species & Habitat Cards - Teacher Master www.greatlakeslessons.com MICHU-07-406 COPY MASTER Perch Family, Percidae Illustration: E. Damstra Yellow perch Perca flavescens n Important food and sport fish throughout southern part of Great Lakes region. n Split dorsal fin. Body has distinct vertical bands. n Habitat: Variety of locations; quiet ponds, streams with little current; large and small lakes including the Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Supplementary Material Feroxichthys Panzhouensis
    Online Supplementary Material Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., a hump-backed colobodontid (Neopterygii, Actinopterygii) from the early Middle Triassic of Panzhou, Guizhou, China Table of Contents 1. Taxa and principal sources of data 2. Supplementary figure 3. Character list 4. Data matrix 5. References to supplementary information 1 1. Taxa and principal sources of data FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA IVPP, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China NHMUK, Natural History Museum, London, UK; PIMUZ, Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Moythomasia durgaringa: Gardiner, 1984 Australosomus kochi: Nielsen, 1949; NHMUK P17141–17143, 17156, 17157, 17160, 17161, 20940–20945 Acipenser brevirostrum: Hilton et al., 2011 Amia calva: Grande and Bemis, 1998 Boreosomus piveteaui: Nielsen, 1942 Brookvalia gracilis: Hutchinson, 1973b Caturus furcatus: FMNH UC2057; Patterson, 1975; Grande and Bemis, 1998 Chondrosteus acipenseroides: Hilton and Forey, 2009 Cleithrolepidina minor: Hutchinson, 1973b Cleithrolepis granulate: Wade, 1935; Hutchinson, 1973b Colobodus baii: Sun et al., 2008; IVPP V19974 Colobodus bassanii: Mutter, 2002, 2004 Colobodus giganteus: Cartanyà et al., 2015 Crenilepis sandbergeri: Mutter, 2002, 2004 Ctenognathichthys bellottii: Bürgin, 1992 Daedalichthys higginsi: Hutchinson, 1973b Dipteronotus olgiatii: Tintori, 1990 Elops hawaiensis: Forey, 1973 Feroxichthys yunnanensis Xu, 2020 Fuyuanperleidus dengi: Geng
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Fish Identification
    Fish Identification References • Hubbs, C., R.J. Edwards, and G.P. Garrett. 2008. An annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species. Texas Academy of Science. Available from: http://www.texasacademyofscience.org/ • Page, L.M. and B.M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes, second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Trade and Reference Publishers. • Pflieger, W.L. 1997. The Fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. • Thomas, C., T.H. Bonner, and B.G. Whiteside. 2007. Freshwater Fishes of Texas. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas. • Robison, H.W. and T.M. Buchanan. 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. The University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Gars • Ganoid scales • Beaklike snout Alligator Gar: Teeth on upper jaw in two rows Gars Spotted Gar: One row of teeth on upper jaw, Snout short Longnose Gar: One row of teeth on upper jaw, Snout long and narrow Herrings • Lateral line absent • Keel along belly Gizzard Shad: Subterminal mouth, blunt snout, large spot Threadfin Shad: Terminal mouth, pointed snout, small spot Minnows Campostoma • Cartilaginous ridge on lower jaw • Intestine long, wound around air bladder Chad Thomas Cyprinella • Typically deep-bodied minnows • Dorsal fin with pigment between rays Red Shiner: Dark shoulder patch, chin bar Blacktail Shiner: Distinct caudal spot Cyprinella Notemigonus Golden Shiner: Lateral line greatly decurved Macrhybopsis Chad Thomas Chubs: Maxillary barbels present, most with speckling Differentiate by location
    [Show full text]