DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 i © Commonwealth of Australia 1998 ISBN 0 642 36772 8 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be repoduced by any process without written permission from AusInfo. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT 2601. Publication approval number 2446 ii FOREWORD The Australian Statistics on Medicines (ASM) is an annual publication produced by the Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee (DUSC) of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Comprehensive drug utilisation data are required for a number of purposes including pharmacosurveillance and the targeting and evaluation of quality use of medicines initiatives. It is also needed by regulatory and financing authorities and by the Pharmaceutical Industry. A major aim of the ASM has been to put comprehensive and valid statistics on the Australian use of medicines in the public domain to allow access by all interested parties. Publication of the Australian data facilitates international comparisons of drug utilisation profiles, and encourages international collaboration on drug utilisation research particularly in relation to enhancing the quality use of medicines and health outcomes. The data available in the ASM represent estimates of the aggregate community use (non public hospital) of prescription medicines in Australia. In 1997 the estimated number of prescriptions dispensed through community pharmacies was 179 million prescriptions, a level of increase over 1996 of only 0.4% which was less than the increase in population (1.2%). A readership survey was conducted in 1998 and it is hoped that some of the suggestions for improvement to the present format will be incorporated in the next edition of the ASM. Another option being considered is making summary utilisation data available via the Internet. Access to information on the indications for which drugs are prescribed, and the age and sex demographics of the patients receiving these prescriptions, will also be available in the near future from an ongoing survey of community medical practitioners. The ASM presents dispensing data on most drugs marketed in Australia and should be an interesting and valuable source of information for researchers working in health care and pharmaceutical services, both in Australia and overseas. D J Birkett Chairman Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee iii iv CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 INFORMATION ON THE AUSTRALIAN STATISTICS ON MEDICINES 2 Drug Utilization Sub-Committee 3 Drug classification 6 ATC system main groups 6 Measurement unit 7 Health Insurance Commission processing 8 Pharmacy Guild Survey data 8 Combined database 9 Drug utilisation trends 12 Tables in the Australian Statistics on Medicines 16 References 16 CAVEATS 17 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 18 Weights and measures 19 ATC & DDD CHANGES 1998 20 TABLE 1 1997 COMMUNITY PRESCRIPTION NUMBERS, TOGETHER WITH GOVERNMENT AND PATIENT COSTS FOR SUBSIDISED DRUGS 23 TABLE 2 COMMUNITY PRESCRIPTION DRUG USE, IN DDDs/1000/DAY, FOR 1995 TO 1997 167 ATC INDEX 249 v LIST OF TABLES Table A: Prescription numbers by ATC groups 12 Table B: Top 10 drugs by defined daily dose/thousand population/day, 1997 13 Table C: Top 10 drugs by prescription counts, 1997 14 Table D: Top 10 drugs by cost to government, 1997 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure A: Community utilisation of enalapril 10 Figure B: Community utilisation of atenolol 10 Figure C: Number of prescriptions by type of service 13 Figure D: Top 10 subsidised drugs dispensed in 1997 15 Figure E: Top 10 non-subsidised drugs dispensed in 1997 15 Figure F: H2-receptor antagonists 171 Figure G: Other drugs used for treatment of peptic ulcer 171 Figure H: Drugs used in the management of hypertension 187 Figure I: Serum lipid reducing drugs, by class 195 Figure J: Serum lipid reducing drugs, individual 195 Figure K: Penicillins and macrolides 211 Figure L: Other selected antibacterial drugs 211 Figure M: Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 220 Figure N: Psychotherapeutic medications 234 Figure O: Selected antidepressants 234 Figure P: Anti-asthmatic drugs 242 vi INTRODUCTION The data contained in the 1997 ASM are drawn from two sources. The first is the Health Insurance Commission records of prescriptions submitted for payment of a subsidy under the Pharmaceutical Benefits and Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Schemes (PBS/ RPBS). The second is an ongoing survey of a representative sample of community pharmacies, which provides an estimate of the non-subsidised use of prescription medicines in the Australian community. The usage of prescription medicines dispensed in public hospitals is not available in this report. The units of measurement are the prescription and the defined daily dose per 1000 population per day (DDD/1000/day). The defined daily dose is established by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology on the basis of the assumed average dose per day of the drug, used for its main indication by adults. The drugs presented in this publication are arranged using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. For more detail on this classification and the unit of measurement, please read the chapter ‘Information on the Australian Statistics on Medicines’. The data are presented in two major tables. Table 1 includes 1997 community (i.e. subsidised and non-subsidised) prescription numbers, together with the government and patient costs for the PBS-listed drugs only. The cost information for the PBS listed drugs includes a component which estimates the under copayment cost based on PBS experience with that drug. Cost information on the dispensing of drugs not listed on the PBS is not available. Table 2 includes community prescription drug use, in DDDs/1000/day, for the years 1995 to 1997. 1 INFORMATION ON THE AUSTRALIAN STATISTICS ON MEDICINES In order to work towards the more rational and cost-effective use of medication in society, it is essential to have accurate information on patterns of drug prescription and use. Where this use is found to be inappropriate, drug utilisation data can monitor the impact of educational or regulatory interventions and can guide the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analysis (1). In Australia around 75% of all community (i.e. non-public hospital) prescriptions are dispensed under one of 2 subsidisation schemes - the PBS and the Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (RPBS). These schemes were established to provide the general community (PBS) and returned servicemen and women (RPBS) with access to necessary medicinal products, which are affordable, available and of acceptable standards. In 1996 the RPBS was 7% of the size of the PBS, however over 90% of the RPBS prescriptions involved PBS listed drugs. In Australia, a new medicinal drug must gain approval for supply in accord with the requirements of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Approval is also required to extend the indications of an established drug. Applications are dealt with by the Therapeutic Goods Administration and, for prescription drugs, advice is sought from an expert committee, the Australian Drug Evaluation Committee (ADEC). Once a prescription drug is approved for marketing, the company concerned usually applies to have the drug listed on the PBS. This is the national scheme available to the Australian community, for subsidising the cost of pharmaceuticals. Because of the attraction of the scheme to consumers, it is usually necessary for the company to have the drug listed on the scheme for viable marketing to occur. It is the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) that recommends what drugs are to be listed on the scheme. Whereas the premarket evaluation addresses the issues of quality, safety and efficacy, the PBAC considers effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the product relative to other alternatives. Once listing has been agreed to by the Government, the price of the drug is negotiated with the company by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Pricing Authority. The Authority consists of government, industry and consumer representatives. Under the PBS, general patients pay the cost of a prescription up to a maximum of $20.00 (as at July 1997). Pensioner and concessional patients pay $3.20 per script. There is a safety net to protect people with high medication needs. Once general patients (and their immediate family) have incurred $612.60 worth of PBS expenditure (indexed) in any 2 calendar year, prescriptions for the remainder of the year cost $3.20. Once pensioners and concessionals have incurred $166.40 worth of expenditure (indexed) in the calendar year, they receive all remaining prescriptions free of charge. Patients may also be required to pay a surcharge where the doctor prescribes a more expensive brand of an item, when there are cheaper, equivalent brands of that item in the PBS. As the general patient copayment rises, the dispensed price of many of the cheaper medications falls under this level and in such cases the patient pays the full price and no claim for payment is transmitted under the PBS. In 1997 the under copayment general prescriptions represented around 19.1% of all community prescribing. As well as this, there are many drugs that are not listed on the PBS or RPBS and are available only on private prescription with the patient paying the full cost
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Common Abbreviations Used in Medication
    UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM MASTERS THESIS Impact of Medication Grouping on Fall Risk Prediction in Elders: A Retrospective Analysis of MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Student: SRP Mentor: Noman Dormosh Dr. Martijn C. Schut Student No. 11412682 – SRP Tutor: Prof. dr. Ameen Abu-Hanna SRP Address: Amsterdam University Medical Center - Location AMC Department Medical Informatics Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam Practice teaching period: November 2018 - June 2019 A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medical Informatics iii Abstract Background: Falls are the leading cause of injury in elderly patients. Risk factors for falls in- cluding among others history of falls, old age, and female gender. Research studies have also linked certain medications with an increased risk of fall in what is called fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs), such as psychotropics and cardiovascular drugs. However, there is a lack of consistency in the definitions of FRIDs between the studies and many studies did not use any systematic classification for medications. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of grouping medications at different levels of granularity of a medication classification system on the performance of fall risk prediction models. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III cohort database. We created seven prediction models including demographic, comorbidity and medication variables. Medica- tions were grouped using the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC) starting from the most specific scope of medications and moving up to the more generic groups: one model used individual medications (ATC level 5), four models used medication grouping at levels one, two, three and four of the ATC and one model did not include med- ications.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Drug Information Vol. 12, No. 3, 1998
    WHO DRUG INFORMATION VOLUME 12 NUMBER 3 • 1998 RECOMMENDED INN LIST 40 INTERNATIONAL NONPROPRIETARY NAMES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSTANCES WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION • GENEVA Volume 12, Number 3, 1998 World Health Organization, Geneva WHO Drug Information Contents Seratrodast and hepatic dysfunction 146 Meloxicam safety similar to other NSAIDs 147 Proxibarbal withdrawn from the market 147 General Policy Issues Cholestin an unapproved drug 147 Vigabatrin and visual defects 147 Starting materials for pharmaceutical products: safety concerns 129 Glycerol contaminated with diethylene glycol 129 ATC/DDD Classification (final) 148 Pharmaceutical excipients: certificates of analysis and vendor qualification 130 ATC/DDD Classification Quality assurance and supply of starting (temporary) 150 materials 132 Implementation of vendor certification 134 Control and safe trade in starting materials Essential Drugs for pharmaceuticals: recommendations 134 WHO Model Formulary: Immunosuppressives, antineoplastics and drugs used in palliative care Reports on Individual Drugs Immunosuppresive drugs 153 Tamoxifen in the prevention and treatment Azathioprine 153 of breast cancer 136 Ciclosporin 154 Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and Cytotoxic drugs 154 withdrawal reactions 136 Asparaginase 157 Triclabendazole and fascioliasis 138 Bleomycin 157 Calcium folinate 157 Chlormethine 158 Current Topics Cisplatin 158 Reverse transcriptase activity in vaccines 140 Cyclophosphamide 158 Consumer protection and herbal remedies 141 Cytarabine 159 Indiscriminate antibiotic
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Undiluted Tea-Tree Oil As a Cosmetic
    Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) Use of undiluted tea-tree oil as a cosmetic Opinion of the Federal Insitute for Risk Assessment (BfR), 1th September 2003 Background Recently there has been an increasing amount of reports on contact-allergic eczema in con- junction with the use of tea-tree oil. Tea-tree oil is sold as a pure natural product, highly con- centrated and undiluted in cosmetics. Tea-tree oil is advertised as a universal remedy al- though there is no marketing authorisation as a pharmaceutical product. Concentrated tea-tree oil has been classified as harmful according to the self-classification of the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) and is labelled with R-phrases R 22 (harmful if swallowed) R 38 (irritating to skin) and R 65 (may cause lung damage if swallowed) as well as the symbol Xn (harmful) (IFRA Labelling Manual 1, 2001). These indications of health hazards are also part of the safety data sheets of raw material suppliers. At the 65th and 66th meetings of the Cosmetics Committee at the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), health risks associated with the use of undiluted and highly concentrated tea-tree oil in cosmetic products were discussed extensively. Result Tea-tree oil is a mixture of various terpenes extracted from the Australian tea-tree. Undiluted tea-tree oil is a pure natural product. In the presence of atmospheric oxygen but also when exposed to light and higher temperatures, oxidation processes occur leading to the formation of peroxides, epoxides and endoperoxides which have a sensitising potency and may trigger allergic skin reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Outpatient Acne Care Guideline
    Outpatient Acne Care Guideline Severity Mild Moderate Severe < 20 comedones or < 20-100 comedones or 15-50 > 5 cysts, >100 comedones, or inflammatory lesions inflammatory lesions >50 inflammatory lesions Initial Treatment Initial Treatment Initial Treatment Benzoyl Peroxide (BP) or Topical Combination Therapy Combination Therapy Topical Retinoid Retinoid + BP Oral antibiotic or OR + (Retinoid + Antibiotic) + BP Topical retinoid Topical Combination Therapy or + BP + Antibiotic Retinoid + (BP + Antibiotic) or OR BP Retinoid + BP Oral antibiotic + topical retinoid + +/- or BP Topical antibiotic Retinoid + Antibiotic + BP or Topical Dapsone IF Inadequate Response IF Inadequate Response IF Inadequate Consider dermatology Response referral Change topical retinoid Consider changing oral concentrations, type and/or antibiotic formulation AND or Add BP or retinoid, if not already Change topiocal combination Consider isotretinoin prescribed therapy Consider hormone therapy or and/or (females) Change topical retinoid Add or change oral antibiotic concentrations, type and/or or formulation Consider isotretinoin Additional Considerations or Consider hormone therapy (females) Change topical comination Previous treatment/history Side effects therapy Costs Psychosocial impact Vehicle selection Active scarring Ease of use Regimen complexity Approved Evidence Based Medicine Committee 1-18-17 Reassess the appropriateness of Care Guidelines as condition changes. This guideline is a tool to aid clinical decision making. It is not a standard of care. The physician should deviate from the guideline when clinical judgment so indicates. GOAL: Pediatricians should initiate treatment for cases of “Mild” to “Severe” acne (see algorithms attached). Pediatricians should also counsel patients in order to maximize adherence to acne treatment regimens: 1. Realistic expectations. Patients should be counseled that topical therapies typically take up to 6-8 weeks to start seeing results.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Disinfectants for Use Against the COVID-19 Virus
    When it comes to choosing a disinfectant to combat the COVID-19 virus, research and health authorities suggest not all disinfectants are equally effective. The difference is in their active ingredient(s). HEALTH CANADA AND U.S. EPA ASSESSMENTS The work to evaluate disinfectants perhaps best starts with lists of approved disinfectants compiled by government health authorities. Health Canada has compiled a list of 85 hard surface disinfectant products (as of March 20, 2020) that meet their requirements for disinfection of emerging pathogens, including the virus that causes COVID-19. It can be accessed here. You can wade through the entire list. But if you locate the Drug Identification Number (DIN) on the disinfectant product label or the safety data sheet (SDS), then you can use the search function to quickly see if the product meets Health Canada requirements. A second list, updated on March 19, 2020, provides 287 products that meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) criteria for use against SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes the disease COVID-19. This list can be found here. Like the Health Canada list, you can wade through this one too. However, to best use this list, you should locate the U.S. EPA registration number on the product label or SDS, and use that number to search the list. The U.S. EPA registration number of a product consists of two sets of numbers separated by a hyphen. The first set of numbers refers to the company identification number, and the second set of numbers following the hyphen represents the product number.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA-2015-N-0101; and FDA-2016-N-0124
    DE PARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD 20993 November 18, 2020 Docket Nos. FDA-1975-N-0012; FDA-2015-N-0101; and FDA-2016-N-0124 The American Cleaning Institute Attention: James Kim, PhD Vice President, Science and Regulatory Affairs 1401 H Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 Re: Benzalkonium Chloride, Benzethonium Chloride, Chloroxylenol, Ethanol, and Povidone-Iodine Dear Dr. Kim: This letter responds to The American Cleaning Institute’s (ACI’s) July 14, 2020 communication regarding the deferral from final rulemaking under the over-the-counter (OTC) Drug Review on benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, chloroxylenol, ethanol, and povidone-iodine for use in nonprescription (often referred to as over-the-counter or OTC) consumer antiseptic wash, health care antiseptic, and consumer antiseptic rub drug products. In March 2016, FDA issued letters granting requests to defer three active ingredients— benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, and chloroxylenol—from inclusion in the final rulemaking for the December 2013 proposed rule for OTC consumer antiseptic washes (78 FR 76444). Similarly, in January 2017, FDA issued letters granting requests to defer six active ingredients—benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, chloroxylenol, ethanol, povidone- iodine, and isopropyl alcohol—from inclusion in the final rulemaking for the May 2015 proposed rule for OTC health care antiseptics (80 FR 25166). In October 2017, FDA issued letters granting requests to defer three active
    [Show full text]
  • Report Name:Ukraine's Mrls for Veterinary Drugs
    Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: November 05,2020 Report Number: UP2020-0051 Report Name: Ukraine's MRLs for Veterinary Drugs Country: Ukraine Post: Kyiv Report Category: FAIRS Subject Report Prepared By: Oleksandr Tarassevych Approved By: Robin Gray Report Highlights: Ukraine adopted several maximum residue levels (MRLs) for veterinary drugs, coccidiostats and histomonostats in food products of animal origin. Ukraine also adopted a list of drugs residues that are not allowed in food products. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY The Office of Agricultural Affairs of USDA/Foreign Agricultural Service in Kyiv, Ukraine prepared this report for U.S. exporters of domestic food and agricultural products. While every possible care was taken in the preparation of this report, information provided may not be completely accurate either because policies have changed since the time this report was written, or because clear and consistent information about these policies was not available. It is highly recommended U.S. exporters verify the full set of import requirements with their foreign customers, who are normally best equipped to research such matters with local authorities, before any goods are shipped. This FAIRS Subject Report accompanies other reports on Maximum, Residue Limits established by Ukraine in 2020. Related reports could be found under the following links: 1.) Ukraine's MRLs for Microbiological Contaminants_Kyiv_Ukraine_04-27-2020 2.) Ukraine's MRLs for Certain Contaminants_Kyiv_Ukraine_03-06-2020 Food Products of animal origin and/or ingredients of animal origin are not permitted in the Ukrainian market if they contain certain veterinary drugs residues in excess of the maximum residue levels established in Tables 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Therapy for Peptic Ulcer Treatment
    Office europeen des brevets © Publication number: 0 480 691 A2 © EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number : 91309249.0 © int. ci.5: A61K 33/24, A61K 31/60, A61K 31/44, A61K 31/425, © Date of filing : 09.10.91 //(A61K33/24, 31:44, 31:425), (A61K31/60, 31:44, 31:425), (A61K31/44, 31:195), (A61K31/425, 31:195) © Priority: 11.10.90 US 595908 © Inventor: Berlin, Roger G. 519 Mulberry Lane Haverford, PA 19041 (US) (43) Date of publication of application : 15.04.92 Bulletin 92/16 @ Representative : Thompson, John Dr. et al Merck & Co., Inc. European Patent @) Designated Contracting States : Department Terlings Park Eastwick Road CH DE FR GB IT LI NL Harlow, Essex CM20 2QR (GB) © Applicant : MERCK & CO. INC. 126, East Lincoln Avenue P.O. Box 2000 Rahway New Jersey 07065-0900 (US) © Combination therapy for peptic ulcer treatment. © Peptic ulcer disease is treated with a combination therapy of famotidine or omeprazole plus a bismuth salt. CM < CO o 00 LU Jouve, 18, rue Saint-Denis, 75001 PARIS EP 0 480 691 A2 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In the past, treatment of peptic ulcer disease was based on either neutralization of intragastric acidity with antacids or the inhibition of production of acid secretion by H2-receptor antagonists or by proton pump inhibition 5 among others. Using bismuth salts alone to heal ulcers has been shown to be effective presumably because of its effect on Helicobacter pylori. Relapse of Helicobacter positivity, however, has been a problem as has relapse of ulcer disease in patients treated with antisecretory therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Consumption in 2017 - 2020
    Page 1 Drug consumption in 2017 - 2020 2020 2019 2018 2017 DDD/ DDD/ DDD/ DDD/ 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital ATC code Subgroup or chemical substance day % day % day % day % A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 322,79 3 312,53 4 303,08 4 298,95 4 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 14,28 4 12,82 4 10,77 6 10,46 7 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 14,28 4 12,82 4 10,77 6 10,46 7 A01AA Caries prophylactic agents 11,90 3 10,48 4 8,42 5 8,45 7 A01AA01 sodium fluoride 11,90 3 10,48 4 8,42 5 8,45 7 A01AA03 olaflur 0,00 - 0,00 - 0,00 - 0,00 - A01AB Antiinfectives for local oral treatment 2,36 8 2,31 7 2,31 7 2,02 7 A01AB03 chlorhexidine 2,02 6 2,10 7 2,09 7 1,78 7 A01AB11 various 0,33 21 0,21 0 0,22 0 0,24 0 A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment 0,02 0 0,03 0 0,04 0 - - A01AD02 benzydamine 0,02 0 0,03 0 0,04 0 - - A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 73,05 3 71,13 3 69,32 3 68,35 3 A02A ANTACIDS 2,23 1 2,22 1 2,20 1 2,30 1 A02AA Magnesium compounds 0,07 22 0,07 22 0,08 22 0,10 19 A02AA04 magnesium hydroxide 0,07 22 0,07 22 0,08 22 0,10 19 A02AD Combinations and complexes of aluminium, 2,17 0 2,15 0 2,12 0 2,20 0 calcium and magnesium compounds A02AD01 ordinary salt combinations 2,17 0 2,15 0 2,12 0 2,20 0 A02B DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND 70,82 3 68,91 3 67,12 3 66,05 4 GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 0,17 7 0,74 4 1,10 4 1,11 5 A02BA02 ranitidine 0,00 1 0,63 3 0,99 3 0,99 4 A02BA03 famotidine 0,16 7 0,11 8 0,11 10 0,12 9 A02BB Prostaglandins 0,04 62
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Reagents Product List 2021
    PRODUCT LIST Examples of our laboratory reagents Product list – selected products Artificial Urine Brooks and Keevil AMPQ44861.1000 Auramine-Rhodamine AMPQ55029.0500 Below is a selection of products. If you cannot find what you are look- Auric Chloride 0.1% AMPQ12450.0500 ing for, please contact us about your specific requests for laboratory reagents, volume and packaging, etc. Auric Chloride 1% AMPQ12452.0100 We mainly use chemicals by p.a. quality. If you want growth control on growing media, please contact us for an offer. B Balanced Salt Solution for Storage AMPQ46214.0100 Product name Cat. No. Balanced Salt Solution with Tris AMPQ40040.1000 Barium Chloride 0.5 M = 1.0 N AMPQ42099.1000 2,4-Dinitroflouro Benzen 1.3% v/v AMPQ44913.0100 Barium Chloride 1 M AMPQ43551.0500 2-Amino-2-Methyl-1,3-propanediol 2.1 % w/v AMPQ42009.0250 Barium Chloride 10% w/v AMPQ10513.1000 2-Propanol 35% AMPQ12900.5000 Barium Diphenylamine Sulfonate AMPQ40838.0500 Basophil Counting Solution AMPQ90492.0200 A Basophilic Colouring Solution AMPQ42037.0100 Acetate Buffer 0.1 M, pH 4.0 AMPQ10021.1000 Benzamidine 0.5 M in MilliQ H2O AMPQ10750.0100 Acetate Buffer 0.1 M, pH 4.8 AMPQ40728.1000 Benzoe I Colouring Solution AMPQ10779.0100 Acetate Buffer 0.1 M, pH 5.9 AMPQ43009.1000 Benzoe II Colouring Solution AMPQ10781.0100 Acetate Buffer 35%, pH 5.6 AMPQ10015.1000 Biebrich Scarlet Solution AMPQ46088.1000 Acetate Buffer Walpole pH 4.1 AMPQ55005.0500 Biebrich's Scarlet Acid Fuchsin AMPQ29082.0500 Acetic Acid 0.1 M Titrated AMPQ11590.5000 Bies Colouring Solution AMPQ10780.0050 Acetic Acid 1% AMPQ11515.1000 BiGGY Agar AMPQ02048.0015 Acetic Acid 10% P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20050181041A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0181041 A1 Goldman (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 18, 2005 (54) METHOD OF PREPARATION OF MIXED Related US. Application Data PHASE CO-CRYSTALS WITH ACTIVE AGENTS (60) Provisional application No. 60/528,232, ?led on Dec. 9, 2003. Provisional application No. 60/559,862, ?led (75) Inventor: David Goldman, Portland, CT (US) on Apr. 6, 2004. Correspondence Address: Publication Classi?cation LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD (51) Int. Cl.7 ....................... .. A61K 31/56; A61K 38/00; TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, SUITE 4900 A61K 9/64 180 NORTH STETSON AVENUE (52) US. Cl. ............................ .. 424/456; 514/179; 514/2; CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780 (US) 514/221 (73) Assignee: MedCrystalForms, LLC, Hunt Valley, (57) ABSTRACT MD This invention pertains to a method of preparing mixed phase co-crystals of active agents With one or more materials (21) Appl. No.: 11/008,034 that alloWs the modi?cation of the active agent to a neW physical/crystal form With unique properties useful for the delivery of the active agent, as Well as compositions com (22) Filed: Dec. 9, 2004 prising the mixed phase co-crystals. Patent Application Publication Aug. 18, 2005 Sheet 1 0f 8 US 2005/0181041 A1 FIG. 1a 214.70°C z.m."m.n... 206.98°C n..0ao 142 OJ/g as:20m=3: -0.8 -1.0 40 90 1:10 2110 Temperture (°C) FIG. 1b 0.01 as:22“.Km: 217 095 24221.4 39Jmum/Q -0.8 35 155 255 255 Temperture (°C) Patent Application Publication Aug.
    [Show full text]