Appendix a Common Abbreviations Used in Medication

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Common Abbreviations Used in Medication UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM MASTERS THESIS Impact of Medication Grouping on Fall Risk Prediction in Elders: A Retrospective Analysis of MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Student: SRP Mentor: Noman Dormosh Dr. Martijn C. Schut Student No. 11412682 – SRP Tutor: Prof. dr. Ameen Abu-Hanna SRP Address: Amsterdam University Medical Center - Location AMC Department Medical Informatics Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam Practice teaching period: November 2018 - June 2019 A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medical Informatics iii Abstract Background: Falls are the leading cause of injury in elderly patients. Risk factors for falls in- cluding among others history of falls, old age, and female gender. Research studies have also linked certain medications with an increased risk of fall in what is called fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs), such as psychotropics and cardiovascular drugs. However, there is a lack of consistency in the definitions of FRIDs between the studies and many studies did not use any systematic classification for medications. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of grouping medications at different levels of granularity of a medication classification system on the performance of fall risk prediction models. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III cohort database. We created seven prediction models including demographic, comorbidity and medication variables. Medica- tions were grouped using the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC) starting from the most specific scope of medications and moving up to the more generic groups: one model used individual medications (ATC level 5), four models used medication grouping at levels one, two, three and four of the ATC and one model did not include med- ications. We compared the predictive performance of these models with the performance of a model with a predefined ATC groups of FRIDs based on the literature and expert review (Expert-Opinion). Medications and comorbidities were extracted from the discharge sum- maries. Logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to construct the prediction models. The main performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Additionally, we systemati- cally evaluated the performance by including area under the precision-recall curve (AUC- PR), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), sensitivity, specificity, precision and the Brier score. Calibration was assessed using calibration plots. In order to internally validate the results, we performed bootstrapping to obtain optimism-corrected estimates and Wilcoxon signed- rank test to test the significance of the median differences of estimates between all the models and the expert-opinion FRIDs model. Results: The highest statistically significant AUC-ROC was achieved by grouping medi- cations at level two of the ATC [0.7143 (CI 95%: 0.710-0.718) compared to 0.698 (CI 95%: 0.6927-0.7018) of the Expert-Opinion model]. The AUC-PR of all the models with medica- tions significantly outperformed the Expert-Opinion model except the ATC-1 model. The values of the other performance measures were varied between the models depending on the grouping level. All the models showed satisfactory calibration. Conclusion: The performance of fall risk prediction model is significantly affected by medi- cation grouping. The discrimination performance is enhanced by grouping the medications using the ATC classification system instead of using a FRIDs list. The optimal grouping level can be determined through experimentation. v Samenvatting Achtergrond: Vallen bij ouderen is een belangrijkste oorzaak van letsel. Risicofactoren voor vallen, waaronder onder meer zijn geschiedenis van vallen, ouderdom en vrouwelijk ges- lacht. Onderzoeksstudies hebben ook bepaalde medicijnen in verband gebracht met een verhoogd valrisico bij zogenaamde valrisicoverhogende geneesmiddelen (FRIDs), zoals psy- chotropen en cardiovasculaire geneesmiddelen. Er is echter een gebrek aan consistentie in de definities van FRIDs tussen de studies en veel studies hebben geen systematische classi- ficatie voor medicijnen gebruikt. Doel: Het doel van deze studie was om het effect te onderzoeken van het groeperen van medicijnen op verschillende niveaus van granulariteit van een medicatieclassificatiesysteem op de prestaties van val-risicovoorspellingsmodellen Methoden: Dit is een retrospectieve analyse van de MIMIC-III cohortdatabase. We hebben zeven voorspellingsmodellen gemaakt, waaronder demografische, comorbiditeits- en med- icatievariabelen. Medicijnen werden gegroepeerd met behulp van het anatomische thera- peutische chemische classificatiesysteem (ATC) uitgaande van de meest specifieke reikwi- jdte van medicijnen en oplopend naar de meer generieke groepen: één model gebruikte individuele medicijnen (ATC niveau 5), vier modellen gebruikten medicatiegroepering op niveau één, twee, drie en vier van de ATC en één model zonder medicijnen. We hebben de voorspellende prestaties van deze modellen vergeleken met de prestaties van een model met vooraf gedefinieerde ATC groepen van FRIDs op basis van de literatuur en expert review (Expert-Opinion). Medicijnen en comorbiditeiten werden uit ontslagsamenvattin- gen gehaald. Logistieke regressie met minst absolute krimp en selectie-operator (LASSO) werd gebruikt om de voorspellingsmodellen te construeren. De belangrijkste prestatiemaat- staf was “area under the receiver operating characteristic curve” (AUC-ROC). Bovendien hebben we de prestaties systematisch geëvalueerd door Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) op te nemen, area under precision recall (AUC-PR), sensitiviteit, specificiteit, precisie en de Brier-score. Om de resultaten intern te valideren, hebben we bootstrapping uitgevoerd om optimisme corrigeerde schattingen te verkrijgen en Wilcoxon signed-rank test om de signif- icantie van de mediaan te testen op verschillen in schattingen tussen alle modellen en het (Expert-Opinion) model. Resultaten: De hoogste statistisch significante AUC-ROC werd bereikt door medicatie te groeperen op niveau twee van de ATC [0.7143 (CI 95 %: 0.710-0.718) vergeleken met 0.698 (CI 95 %: 0.6927-0.7018) van het Expert-Opinion model]. De AUC-PR van alle modellen met medicijnen overtrof aanzienlijk het Expert-Opinion-model behalve het ATC-1 model. De waarden van de andere prestatiemetingen varieerden tussen de modellen, afhankelijk van het groeperingsniveau. Alle modellen vertoonden een bevredigende kalibratie. Conclusie: De prestaties van val-risicovoorspelling worden aanzienlijk beïnvloed door med- icatiegroepering. De discriminatieprestaties van de val voorspellen is verbeterd door de hele medicatie te groeperen met behulp van het ATC classificatiesysteem in plaats van de FRIDs lijst. Het optimale groeperingsniveau kan worden bepaald door middel van experimenten. vii Acknowledgements I would like first of all to thank my wife Heba. She has been extremely support- ive of me throughout my life and has made innumerable sacrifices to help me get to this point. Thanks to my children, Boshra, Mohammad, and the triplets Omar, Huda and Hamza, who have continually provided the requisite motivation to finish my degree. My parents who taught me to pursue perfection instead of excellence, deserve special thanks. Without such a team behind me, I doubt that I would be in this place today. I would like to thank my tutor Prof. Dr. Ameen Abu Hanna and the daily mentor, Dr. Martijn Schut, for their prompt guidance and support through the SRP-process. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Nathalie van der Velde who provided valuable inputs and feedback to the SRP. Special thanks go to Dr. Ronald Cornet who granted me the permission to access the data used in this thesis, the MIMIC database. Last but not least, thanks to you reader. You have read at least one page of my thesis. Thank You.. ix Contents Abstract iii Abstract (Dutch) v Acknowledgements vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Questions . .2 1.2 Outline of this Thesis . .3 2 Background 5 2.1 Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs (FRIDs) . .5 2.2 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database .6 2.3 Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC) . .7 2.4 Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) . .8 3 Materials and Methods 11 3.1 Study Design . 11 3.2 Population . 11 3.3 Patient and Event Inclusion . 12 3.4 Data Extraction . 13 3.5 Data Processing . 14 3.6 Clinical Outcome . 15 3.7 Outcome Measurements: Predictive Performance . 15 3.8 Statistical Analysis . 15 3.9 Models Validation . 16 4 Results 17 4.1 Study Population . 17 4.2 Extracted Variables . 18 4.3 Missing Variables . 19 4.4 Measures of Predictive Performance . 19 5 Discussion and Future Direction 25 Appendix 29 x A Common Abbreviations Used in Medication Extraction 31 B Average Predictive Comparison (APC) 33 Bibliography 49 1 Chapter 1 Introduction About one-third of community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 years and more fall at least once per year [1]. Falls are the major cause of injury among elders and result in high healthcare demand. Age-related problems, including falls, are expected to increase in the coming decades due to aging population. As a consequence, falls are expected to become one of the major public health problems worldwide [2–4]. There are several risk factors for falls including among others history of falls, old age, fe- male gender and mobility problems [5–8]. Research studies have also linked certain
Recommended publications
  • Chlorthalidone Is Superior to Potassium Citrate in Reducing Calcium Phosphate Stones and Increasing Bone Quality in Hypercalciuric Stone-Forming Rats
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Chlorthalidone Is Superior to Potassium Citrate in Reducing Calcium Phosphate Stones and Increasing Bone Quality in Hypercalciuric Stone-Forming Rats Nancy S. Krieger,1 John R. Asplin,2 Ignacio Granja,2 Felix M. Ramos,1 Courtney Flotteron,1 Luojing Chen,1 Tong Tong Wu,3 Marc D. Grynpas,4 and David A. Bushinsky1 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; 2Litholink Corporation, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Chicago, Illinois; 3Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York; and 4Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ABSTRACT Background The pathophysiology of genetic hypercalciuric stone-forming rats parallels that of human idiopathic hypercalciuria. In this model, all animals form calcium phosphate stones. We previously found that chlorthalidone, but not potassium citrate, decreased stone formation in these rats. Methods To test whether chlorthalidone and potassium citrate combined would reduce calcium phos- phate stone formation more than either medication alone, four groups of rats were fed a fixed amount of a normal calcium and phosphorus diet, supplemented with potassium chloride (as control), potassium citrate, chlorthalidone (with potassium chloride to equalize potassium intake), or potassium citrate plus chlorthalidone. We measured urine every 6 weeks and assessed stone formation and bone quality at 18 weeks. Results Potassium citrate reduced urine calcium compared with controls, chlorthalidone reduced it fur- ther, and potassium citrate plus chlorthalidone reduced it even more. Chlorthalidone increased urine citrate and potassium citrate increased it even more; the combination did not increase it further.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Product Characteristics
    Summary of Product Characteristics 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT MAXITROL ophthalmic ointment 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Ophthalmic ointment: 1 g ointment contains 1 mg dexamethasone, 3,500 I.U. neomycin sulphate (as base) and 6,000 I.U.polymyxin B sulphate. For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Ophthalmic ointment White to very pale yellow homogeneous translucent ointment 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Maxitrol ophthalmic ointment is indicated for the treatment of eye infections which are responsive to steroids, when an antibiotic is also needed. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Children and Adults (including the Elderly) Apply a small amount (1-1.5 cm) in the conjunctival sac 3 to 4 times daily, or use as a supplement to the eye drops at bedtime. After application of the ointment, look downward for a moment before closing the eyes. Method of administration: For ocular use. To prevent contamination of the tube tip and ointment, care must be taken not to touch the eyelids, surrounding areas, or other surfaces with the tube tip. Keep the tube tightly closed when not in use. 4.3 Contraindications • Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1. • Herpes simplex keratitis. • Vaccinia, varicella, and other viral infection of cornea or conjunctiva. • Fungal diseases of ocular structures. • Mycobacterial ocular infections. 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use - For topical ophthalmic use only. Not for injection or ingestion. - As with all antibacterial preparation prolonged use may lead to overgrowth of non- susceptible bacterial strains or fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Potassium-Magnesium Citrate Is an Effective Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Calcium Oxalate Nephrolithiasis
    0022-5347/97/1586-2069$03.00/0 JOURNAL OF UROLOGY Vol. 158,2069-2073, December 1997 Copyright Q 1997 by AMERICANUROLOGICAL ASS~CIATION, INC. Printed in U.S.A. POTASSIUM-MAGNESIUM CITRATE IS AN EFFECTIVE PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST RECURRENT CALCIUM OXALATE NEPHROLITHIASIS BRUCE ETTINGER,* CHARLES Y. C. PAK, JOHN T. CITRON, CARL THOMAS, BEVERLEY ADAMS-HIJET AND ARLINE VANGESSEL From the Diuision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California, the Department of Mineral Metabolism, Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California, Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco, California, and Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Oakland, California ABSTRACT Purpose: We examined the efficacy of potassium-magnesium citrate in preventing recurrent calcium oxalate kidney calculi. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective double-blind study of 64 patients who were randomly assigned to receive placebo or potassium-magnesium citrate (42 mEq. potassium, 21 mEq. magnesium, and 63 mEq. citrate) daily for up to 3 years. Results. New calculi formed in 63.6%of subjects receiving placebo and in 12.9%of subjects receiving potassium-magnesiumcitrate. When compared with placebo, the relative risk of treat- ment failure for potassium-magnesium citrate was 0.16 (95%confidence interval 0.05 to 0.46). potassium-magnesium citrate had a statistically significant effect (relative risk 0.10,95%confi- dence interval 0.03 to 0.36) even after adjustment for possible confounders, including age, pretreatment calculous event rate and urinary biochemical abnormalities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Minerals in the Long Term Health of Humans Philip H
    The Importance of Minerals in the Long Term Health of Humans Philip H. Merrell, PhD Technical Market Manager, Jost Chemical Co. Calcium 20 Ca 40.078 Copper 29 Cu 63.546 Iron Magnesium 26 12 Fe Mg 55.845 24.305 Manganese Zinc 25 30 Mn Zn 55.938 65.380 Table of Contents Introduction, Discussion and General Information ..................................1 Calcium ......................................................................................................3 Copper .......................................................................................................7 Iron ...........................................................................................................10 Magnesium ..............................................................................................13 Manganese ..............................................................................................16 Zinc ..........................................................................................................19 Introduction Daily intakes of several minerals are necessary for the continued basic functioning of the human body. The minerals, Calcium (Ca), Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), Magnesium (Mg), Manganese (Mn), and Zinc (Zn) are known to be necessary for proper function and growth of the many systems in the human body and thus contribute to the overall health of the individual. There are several other trace minerals requirements. Minimum (and in some cases maximum) daily amounts for each of these minerals have been established by the Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Assisted Treatment MAT
    Medication Assisted Treatment MAT The Root Center provides medication assisted treatment (MAT) for substance use disorders to those who qualify. MAT uses medications in combination with counseling and behavioral therapies to provide a “whole-patient” approach. The ultimate goal of MAT is full recovery, including the ability to live a self-directed life. This treatment approach has been shown to: improve patient survival, increase retention in treatment, decrease illicit opiate and other drug use as well as reduce other criminal activity among people with substance use disorders, increase patients’ ability to gain and maintain employment, and improve birth outcomes among women who have substance use disorders and are pregnant. These approved medications assist with urges, cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and some act as a blocking mechanism for the euphoric effects of alcohol and opioids. Currently, Root offers methadone for opioid use disorder and is considering adding other medications listed below. Opioid Use Disorder Overdose Prevention Methadone Methadone is an opioid treatment medication that reduces withdrawal Naloxone symptoms in people addicted to heroin or other narcotic drugs without Naloxone is a medication which causing the “high” associated with the drug. saves lives by reversing the effects of an opioid overdose. Root Center Methadone is used as a pain reliever and as part of drug addiction patients, their friends and family detoxification and maintenance programs. It is available only from members, can receive a prescription a certified pharmacy. for Naloxone as early as the initial evaluation and throughout treatment. Buprenorphine The medication is administered Buprenorphine is an opioid treatment medication and the combination at the time of the overdose.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Indications for Proton Pump Inhibitors and Tapering Information When Indicated
    Clinical Indications for Proton Pump Inhibitors and Tapering Information When Indicated MacKenzie Crist, Pharm.D. Candidate 2017 Nabila Ahmed -Sarwar, Pharm.D, BCPS, CDE October 2016 Appropriate indications for PPIs Treatment Recommendations for GERD ● Initial eight-week course of therapy Try to lower dose, as needed therapy, or Short-Term Treatment Long-Term Treatment intermittent therapy ● ○ ● GERD ● Refractory GERD Refractory GERD—No response to PPI therapy after two to ● Gastric and duodenal ● Erosive esophagitis three months (needs GI consult and endoscopy) ulcers ● Barrett’s esophagus Add a bedtime H2 blocker if nocturnal symptoms ● H. pylori co-therapy ● History of NSAID induced Double the dose ○ bleeding ulcers Concerns with Chronic PPI Therapy ○ ● Chronic anticoagulation ● Clostridium difficile infections after a GI bleed ● Hypomagnesaemia ● NSAID or dual anti-platelet ● Increased fracture risk agent use* ● Acute interstitial nephritis (rare, idiopathic) ● Chronic kidney disease (weak observational data may be *presence of multiple risk factors: Age>65 years, high dose NSAID associated with dose and duration) therapy, PUD, concurrent corticosteroids or anticoagulants When PPIs Should Be Tapered and Not Abruptly Discontinued ● Patients who do not have any appropriate indications for continuing a PPI, but have been on a PPI for > six months, and asymptomatic at least 3 months ● Counsel patient on initial worsening of symptoms during tapering phase PPI Tapering Algorithm Step 1: Tapering Schedule Step 2: Management of Recurrence H2 Antagonist and antacids may be added while tapering for breakthrough symptoms Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterology. 2013; 108:308-328. Bundeff AW, Zaiken K.
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors
    MEDICATION POLICY: Proton Pump Inhibitors Generic Name: Proton Pump Inhibitors Preferred: Esomeprazole (generic), Lansoprazole (generic), Omeprazole (generic), Therapeutic Class or Brand Name: Proton Pantoprazole (generic), and Rabeprazole Pump Inhibitors (generic) Applicable Drugs (if Therapeutic Class): Non-preferred: Aciphex® (rabeprazole), Esomeprazole (generic), Lansoprazole Dexilant® (dexlansoprazole), Nexium® (generic), Omeprazole (generic), Pantoprazole (esomeprazole), Not Medically Necessary: (generic), and Rabeprazole (generic). Omeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate (generic), Aciphex® (rabeprazole), Dexilant® Zegerid® (omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate). (dexlansoprazole), Nexium® (esomeprazole), Prevacid® (lansoprazole), Prilosec® Date of Origin: 2/1/2013 (omeprazole), and Protonix® (pantoprazole). Date Last Reviewed / Revised: 12/23/2020 Omeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate (generic), Zegerid® (omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate). Policy also applies to any other Proton Pump Inhibitors not listed. GPI Code: 4927002000, 4927002510, 4927004000, 4927006000, 4927007010, 4927007610, 4999600260 PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA (May be considered medically necessary when criteria I and II are met) I. Documented diagnosis of one of the following A through G: A. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). B. Erosive esophagitis. C. Gastric ulcers. D. Risk reduction of NSAID-associated gastric ulcer. E. Duodenal ulcers. F. Eradication of H. pylori. G. Hypersecretory conditions II. Non-preferred PPIs require documented trials and failures of all generic PPIs. EXCLUSION
    [Show full text]
  • Description Price NDC CABLE PULSE OX (4083) 0 DERMABOND(DNX12) (SEE MIKE) 0 HO-CEMENTED STEM SZ 16 71316216 10671.26 NECK METHA MOD
    Description Price NDC CABLE PULSE OX (4083) 0 DERMABOND(DNX12) (SEE MIKE) 0 HO-CEMENTED STEM SZ 16 71316216 10671.26 NECK METHA MOD. 130DEG./7.5 L NC077K 8451.29 NECK METHA MOD. 130DEG/7.5 L-R NC079K 8400.06 NEEDLE HOLDER WEBSTER P0405 0 POLYP ETRAP 00711099 1202.32 SET CLEANING BRUSHES 0 TIDISHIELD FRAMES/LENS 9210A-100 0 #1613 VENTILATOR CIR 20.01 #1627 VENTILATOR CIR 21.39 #9 WINDOW ENVELOPE(LAB) 0 * 0 ** 3A ANDROSTANEDIOL GLUCURONIDE 345.81 ** ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (FRAC) 70.66 ** ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (FRAC) 99.51 ** CSF3R EXON 14/17 MUTATION 787.47 ** FCM EACH ADDITIONAL MARKER 19.76 ** FECAL ALPHA-1 ANTIRYPSIN 183.16 ** FLOW CYTO INTER/REPT 2 TO 8 MARKERS 115.37 ** TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS QNT UR 227.87 ** URINE PHOSPHORUS ASSAY 70.66 **% DELTA 2 HR 0 **% DELTA 4 HR 0 **% DELTA 6 HR 0 **(RI ANTIBODY WESTERN BLOT ATHENA 246.62 *****UR MICROSCOPIC ONLY 61.69 *****URINALYSIS CANCELLATION NOTICE 0 *****URINALYSIS,BIOCHEM REQUEST 0 *****URINALYSIS,BIOCHEM REQUEST 0 ****2HR URINE CREATININE 70.66 ****CHLAMYDIA PNEUMONIAE AB IGG 79.32 ****HLA TYPING FOR CELIAC DISEASE 0 ****PLATELET AB SERUM 250.95 ****PLATELET PHERESIS LEUKO RED IRRAD 2787.85 ****VMA-SERUM 294.23 ***ANAPLASMA AMP DNA PROBE 469.17 ***BLEEDING TIME 62.02 ***HLA-B27 DNA TYPING 0 ***HSV AB IGM 197.59 ***IGG SERUM 172.72 ***IMMUNOGLOBULIN IGA1 SUBCLASS 57.69 ***IMMUNOGLOBULIN IGA2 SUBCLASS 57.69 ***LYME ANTIGEN DETECTION ELISA 167.67 ***LYME IGM ANTIBODY 204.8 ***MOLD ALLERGEN SCREEN 109.61 ***PATHOLOGY GROSS ONLY 0 **1 HR INCUBATION MIX PROGRESSIVE 89.43 **11 DEOXYCORTISOL
    [Show full text]
  • Injectable Anesthesia in South American Camelids
    INJECTABLE ANESTHESIA IN SOUTH AMERICAN CAMELIDS Thomas Riebold DVM, Diplomate ACVAA Veterinary Teaching Hospital College of Veterinary Medicine Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 INTRODUCTION Interest in llamas, and more recently in alpacas, as pets and as breeding and pack animals has led to increased demand for veterinary services for them. While they have some unique species characteristics regarding anesthesia, many of the principles and techniques used in food animal and equine anesthesia also apply to South American camelids. Except for differences in size, anesthetic management of alpacas and llamas is similar. Much like there are species differences between cattle, sheep, and goats in their response to xylazine, it does appear that alpacas require higher doses of sedatives, approximately 10-20%, to obtain the same response that lower doses of sedatives would obtain in llamas. PREANESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS Consideration for preanesthetic preparation includes fasting, assessment of hematologic and blood chemistry values, venous catheterization, and estimation of bodyweight. The camelid has a stomach divided into three compartments. Therefore, potential complications similar to those of domestic ruminants, regurgitation and aspiration pneumonia, exist during anesthesia. Abdominal tympany as it occurs in anesthetized domestic ruminants does not appear to occur in anesthetized camelids. It is recommended that the animals be fasted 12-18 hours and deprived of water for 8-12 hours. In nonelective cases, this is often not possible and precautions should be taken to avoid aspiration of gastric fluid and ingesta. Fasting neonatal camelids is not advisable because hypoglycemia may result. As in other species, hematologic and blood chemistry values are determined before anesthesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicare Part D Excluded Drug List
    MEDICARE PART D EXCLUDED DRUGS LIST 2016_updated July 2016 Reason: LIST = multiple reasons it's excluded; "not covered under Part D law" Reason: Not properly listed with FDA = CMS considers it best practice for Part D sponsors to consider the proper listing of a drug product with the FDA as a prerequisite for making a Part D drug coverage determination. The FDA is unable to provide regulatory status determinations through their regular processes if a drug product is not properly listed. Therefore, Part D sponsors should begin the drug coverage determination process by confirming that a prescription drug product national drug code (NDC) is properly listed with the FDA. Reason: DESI = Less Than Effective (LTE) drug for ALL indications Label Name Reason 1ST BASE CRE Bulk Ingredient 2-FUCCOSYLLA PAK LACTO-N Medical Food ABANEU-SL SUB Vitamin/Mineral ABLAVAR INJ 244MG/ML Diagnostic Agent ACACIA EXTRA SOL 1:20 Non-standardized allergenic ACCUCAINE INJ 1% LIST ACD FORMULA SOL A Blood Component ACD-A SOL Blood Component ACLARO PD EMU 4% Cosmetic ACREMONIUM SOL 20000PNU Non-standardized allergenic ACTCT FLEX 3 PAD 4"X4" Not properly listed with FDA ACTHREL INJ 100MCG Diagnostic Agent ACTI ANTIMIC PAD 2"X2" Not properly listed with FDA ACTI ANTIMIC PAD 4"X4" Not properly listed with FDA ACTICOAT 7 PAD 2"X2" Not properly listed with FDA ACTICOAT 7 PAD 4"X5" Not properly listed with FDA ACTICOAT ABS PAD 4"X5" Not properly listed with FDA ACTICOAT MOI PAD 2"X2" Surgical Supply/Medical ACTICOAT MOI PAD 4"X4" Surgical Supply/Medical ACTICOAT MOI PAD
    [Show full text]