DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Testimony Transportation Funding Task Force Meeting 15 December, 11Th 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Testimony Transportation Funding Task Force Meeting 15 December, 11Th 2019 Written Testimony Transportation Funding Task Force Meeting 15 December, 11th 2019 Sent: Wed 11/20/2019 From: Jackson Calhoun <[email protected]> Subject: Testimony for T2020 task force meeting T2020 Task Force Testimony Jackson Calhoun Wednesday, November 20, 2019 My name is Jackson Calhoun. I am 15 years old, and I am a sophomore at Rex Putnam High School. I Ride to school every day. My ride is a battle between the bike lane and my bike. A battle to avoid trash cans, gravel, blackberry vines hanging down into the bike lane, roots, bumps and giant leaf piles that could cause me to crash if I were to run into them. A few weeks ago I ran into the king of the evil blackberry vines. It scratched up my rain jacket and shocked me greatly. And a few days ago I almost ran into a trash can! Luckily I didn’t crash. My bike ride to tonight’s meeting was not very safe - while the new Trolley Trail is nice, most of Clackamas County is very difficult for bike riders. It took me an extra 20 minutes to get to the MAX station because of the lack of service in Clackamas county. Yet, I braved the long journey, darkness, miserable traffic, transit fare, the treacherous roads lacking bike lanes and sidewalks today because my future is on the line, and I’m tired of my elected officials pretending that they are speaking for me and my classmates when they are really more interested in money, attention and photo ops. How convenient it is, then, that the adults in this room sitting around this table have the opportunity to demand that Clackamas County gets the transit, biking and walking investments it deserves. Investments that not only make it easier for my classmates and neighbors who can’t drive to get around, but also to do something about the rising oceans, endless droughts, worsening fires, and predicted food shortages and poverty that threaten my health, my safety, and my future. We can pay for this future by reallocating funding away from needless road projects and towards meaningful, world-class transit corridors connecting our communities. For my future and the future of the entire human race you must not spend a single cent of this transportation package on roads, freeways or anything that encourages increased greenhouse gas emissions. Despite what certain representatives and elected officials are saying at this task force and at other meetings in recent months, the freeway expansions and road widening projects do not serve my needs. Clackamas County is changing - there’s a very large number of people in Oregon City, Milwaukie, West Linn and Oak Grove who want to vote for a transportation package that eases congestion, improves air pollution, encourages children to bike and walking to school, and prepares our region for climate change. With our changing demographics, we need to prepare for large numbers of my neighbors who are unable to drive as they get older - we also to prepare for large numbers of my classmates who are interested in finding housing near transit to support the environment. I volunteer with Sunrise PDX and I, too, am gravely worried about climate change. At the age 15, I will be 26 when my climate fate is sealed. Is anyone on this panel younger than 26 now? The current proposal - the one in which Clackamas County Commissioners are insisting must include hundreds of millions of dollars for freeways to parts of the region that very few people live in is ridiculous. I even read a newspaper report in which a lake Oswego city councilor said that widening roads to decrease traffic would reduce carbon emissions! What kind of cognitive dissonance does it require to think that making bigger roads will result in decreased carbon emissions. That’s a joke! like saying that getting a bigger plate will cause you to be less fat because you will eat food slower. All it will really do is cause you to get more food in the first place. I’m sorry if it seems like I’m angry tonight, but that’s because I am. The idea of putting money into something that will end up destroying my future is unbelievable. I’d like to invite you all to love the future generations and invest every cent of this transportation package in renewable transportation. I hope in ten years, at age 26, when I go to visit my home high school Rex Putnam that every student there is sure of their future and is easily able to travel anywhere in the area without the use of a pollusive car. I hope that the adults in the room stop tip-toeing around the urgent climate crisis we face, and collectively agree we must no longer delude ourselves that including the Clackamas County freeway projects is a necessary evil but instead a red herring that prevents me and my generation from living on a planet not ruined by climate chaos. I hope that my voice helps remind us that there is no monolithic voter in Clackamas. I hope in ten years, my bike ride and my max ride won’t be so miserable. I hope in ten years, we look back on these meetings as the moment we got serious about the climate impacts of these freeway expansions in my backyard. I hope in ten years, you won’t regret that you ignored the youth climate leaders testifying today. I hope in ten years, you’ll be able to look me in the face and tell me you did everything you could. I hope to see you there. Time’s ticking, we’ll be watching. -- Thank you, Jackson Calhoun Age 15 [email protected] (503) 732-5960 Sent: Fri 11/22/2019 From: Michael Goff <[email protected]> Subject: Coupling transportation funding and land use Hi, I testified at the November 20 meeting of the task force, and I would like to submit the following comments as follow-up. I am generally supportive of a comprehensive funding package that will support the growth that our region is expected and should strive for. That includes funding across the full range of modes: road capacity, rail, buses, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. However, I wish to see Metro adopt as a principle in this funding package and going forward that transportation funding is coupled with the requirement that cities increase zoning capacity around the upgraded corridors. This is necessary to insure that the funded projects are used to their full capacity, thus respecting the taxpayers. Furthermore, as our region is suffering from a severe housing affordability challenge, we should take advantage of the opportunity provided by this investment manager to address it by allowing our housing stock to increase. Thank you for your work on this critical project. I recognize the challenge in crafting a funding package that respects the full range of stakeholder expectations and appreciate your effort. Sincerely, Michael Goff 967 NE Orenco Station Loop, Apt. 423 Hillsboro, OR 97124 206-554-1989 Sent: Tue 11/26/2019 From: Gary Brown <[email protected]> Subject: Getmoving2020 I attended the Metro transportation task force meeting last Wednesday and was pleased to see the theme GetMoving2020. Lets Get Moving, again. I have lived in westside Aloha for over 30 years and all I have felt with transportation is it getting slower, slower to get about anywhere, no matter what your mode of transportation is. For most of the last 150 years we have been reducing the time, and increasing the efficiency, to travel. But we have been going backwards, by these metrics, in the Portland region. I am all for mass transit, but we need to support efficient cross town and through town transportation as well. Mass transit here doesnt achieve that and we cant ignore other means of transportation in the meanwhile. I am a retired engineer and now volunteer school teacher for a STEM program, and need to get to schools all over. It can take me 1 hour and 45 min to go 18 miles from my house to schools in Northeast Portland. Using mass transit would take >2.5 hrs each way! This is ridiculous, and it discourages me from this charity work. My wife had to plan 1 hour of travel each way 12 miles to get from Aloha to downtown for a doc appointment the other day. This is wasteful, on so many levels! So please create a plan that Gets us Moving again! Sincerely, Gary Brown Retired Engineer, Full-time Volunteer, and Concerned Resident of Oregon Sent: Sat 11/30/2019 From: Laurie Sonnenfeld <[email protected]> Subject: McLoughlin Area transportation improvements public comment Hello and thank you for selecting the Mcloughlin corridor for consideration for $200 million in improvements. The area needs these projects and will benefit from them. I am specifically writing to urge you to fund adding two more tiers to the Park Ave. Parking Garage. I live near the Park Ave station in Island Station and I also work actively as a realtor in the area. The limited parking for MAX there impacts both Oak Grove and Milwaukie residents who live within a few blocks of the station since the overflow parking ends up in our neighborhoods. I expect it also deters some riders who would rather take the train but can't park and don't want to walk several blocks to the train. Additional parking would be helpful and make a positive impact. Having our streets full of cars from outside the neighborhood impacts our livability and our use of our neighborhood streets for walking and other activities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1999 OREGON HIGHWAY PLAN Including Amendments November 1999 Through May 2015
    1999 OREGON HIGHWAY PLAN Including amendments November 1999 through May 2015 An Element of the Oregon Transportation Plan THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Copyright © 1999 by the Oregon Department of Transportation Permission is given to quote and reproduce parts of this document if credit is given to the source. A copy of this plan and amendments as the Oregon Transportation Commission adopted them are on file at the Oregon Department of Transportation and online at: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Pages/Plans.aspx#OHP. Editorial changes for consistency have been made in this document. Amendments Incorporated into May 2015 version of 1999 OHP 99-01: Highway Reclassification (9 November 1999) 00-02: Expressway Classification (11 May 2000) 00-03: Expressway Classifications and Technical Corrections (7 June 2000) 00-04: Alternate Mobility Standards; RVMPO and Metro (13 December 2000) 01-05: Expressway Classifications (11 April 2001) 01-06: Conditional Designation of STAs and Designation of UBAs (9 August 2001) 02-07: Jurisdictional Transfers (November 2002) 03-08: Bypass Policy (16 April 2003) 03-09: Amendment of Appendix E: NHS Intermodal Connectors (18 June 2003) 04-10: Amended Policy 1B (14 January 2004) 04-11: Highway Segment Designations (14 January 2004) 04-11: Highway Segment Designation Maps (14 January 2004) 04-12: Technical Corrections to the Oregon Highway Plan (2 July 2004) 04-13: Technical Corrections to the Oregon Highway Plan (20 December 2004) 05-14: Designation of Special Transportation Areas (10 January 2005)
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Plan
    WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT TASK FORCE MEMBERS Tom Archer, Spieker Properties (Equity Office) Dr. Gene Davis, Property Owner David Drescher, Fans of Fanno Creek Kimberly Fuller, Spieker Properties (Equity Office) Nic Herriges, Nimbus Business Commuters Carl Hosticka, Metro Council (District #3) Ron Hudson, Tigard-Tualatin School District Leo Huff, Oregon Dept. of Transportation Kathy Lehtola, Washington County Dan McFarling, Association of Oregon Rail and Transit Advocates Robert Mixon, Bicycle Transportation Alliance Lyndon Musolf, Lyn Musolf & Associates Michael Neunzert, Metzger Resident Adele Newton, Washington County League of Women Voters Nawzad Othman, OTAK Steve Perry, Metzger Resident Lynn Peterson, Tri-Met Jack Reardon, Washington Square Mall Rick Saito, Group Mackenzie Ken Scheckla, Tigard City Council Forrest Soth, Beaverton City Council Ted Spence, Tigard Resident Dave Stewart, Citizens for Sensible Transportation Pat Whiting, Citizen Participation Organization (CPO) 4-M Nick Wilson, Tigard Planning Commission WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT June 29, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director Nadine Smith, Project Manager Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner Beth St. Amand, Assistant PREPARED BY: Spencer & Kupper, Project Management with Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. URS/BRW, Inc. Deirdre Steinberg Communications This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), local government, and State of Oregon funds.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Scientific Investigations Map 3027, Back
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3027 GEOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS within the Juan de Fuca Plate. Beneath Puget Sound, the Juan de LIFELINE VULNERABILITY TO EARTH- Electrical Power Facilities Fuca Plate reaches a depth of 40-60 km and begins to bend even Despite the lack of recent, large, damaging earthquakes, more steeply downward, forming a “knee” (see cross section in QUAKES Regional electrical power systems were out of service earth scientists now understand that earthquake hazards in the fig. 1). The knee is the location where the largest intraplate zone following the 1995 Kobe, 1994 Northridge, and 1989 Loma The vulnerability of lifeline systems to earthquakes is Portland/Vancouver are greater than previously known. This earthquakes occur, such as the 1949 and 2001 events beneath Prieta earthquakes. Such failures are often due to self-protecting related to the type and condition of structures and to the severity may seem at odds with the experience of long-time residents of Olympia, Washington, and the 1965 event beneath the Seattle- features that are engineered into the system and can often be of the earthquake. Lifeline system building structures are Oregon and Washington who can recall only the large earth- Tacoma International Airport in Seatac, Washington. restored within 24 to 72 hours. Many of the power failures in the vulnerable to earthquake shaking, just as are residential and quakes farther north in Olympia, Washington, in 1949 and The same mechanisms that cause deep earthquakes Seattle area during the 2001 Nisqually earthquake were of this commercial building structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXT AND SCALE ON INDIVDIUAL ACCESSIBILITY: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joseph Weber, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 2001 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Mei-Po Kwan, Adviser Professor Morton O’Kelly Adviser Professor W.
    [Show full text]
  • OR 217 Active Traffic Management (ATM) Project
    OR217 Active Traffic Management (ATM) Project Oregon Department of Transportation 355 Capitol Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 Category: Improving State Operations Initiation Date – March 15, 2013 Completion Date - October 31, 2014 Sponsor Kurtis Danka ODOT Chief Information Officer (CIO) Project Manager Allan Hansen Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ODOT Information Systems Branch (ISB) 1 Executive Summary Oregon Route 217 is a limited access freeway that serves the southwestern suburbs of Portland, Oregon. Over 2 million people live in the Portland metropolitan area and of these, over 115,000 vehicles per day on average travel highway route 217. Traffic on this highway has more than doubled over the last three decades, which has significantly degraded its mobility and safety, as it is operating at or above capacity. To address these concerns, the corridor has been the subject of several studies which identified traditional reconstruction improvement options. Such options came with high costs, which resulted in funding gaps that the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) was unable to bridge. In 2011, ODOT completed the OR 217 Interchange Management Study that evaluated low-cost improvements to improve the corridor’s reliability, mobility, and safety. The study identified a menu of improvement alternatives, which were rated according to key performance measures such as travel time reliability, crash reduction potential, incident recovery time, and affordability. The OR217 Active Traffic Management (ATM) project, which includes: traveler information, advisory speed, and congestion management systems, was initiated in the fall of 2012 as a result of the 2011 study. The Active Traffic Management (ATM) project includes variable advisory speed signs based on measured flows and speeds, posting real time travel times.
    [Show full text]
  • FFCO Refunding 2012
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 NEW ISSUE Rating: Moody’s A1 Book-Entry Only See “Rating” herein In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Special Counsel to the City (“Special Counsel”), under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing compliance with certain tax covenants described herein, (i) the portion of the payments made under the Financing Agreement designated and constituting interest received by the holders of the Obligations (“Interest”) is excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and (ii) Interest is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations under the Code; such Interest, however, is included in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on such corporations. In the opinion of Special Counsel, Interest is exempt from State of Oregon personal income tax under existing law. See “Tax Matters” herein. the City has designated the Financing Agreement as a “qualified tax-exempt obligation” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Code.. CITY OF SHERWOOD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON $5,245,000 Full Faith and Credit Refunding Obligations, Series 2012 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: as shown on inside cover The Full Faith and Credit Refunding Obligations, Series 2012 (the “Obligations”) are issued in book-entry only form in denominations of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof. The Obligations are registered obligations issued in the name of CEDE & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Rickreall Interchange Area Management Plan
    CHAPTER 1 Background 1.1 Transportation Facility Plan Purpose This report documents the results of the transportation facility planning process conducted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for the intersection of Oregon Route 22 and Oregon Route 99W at Rickreall. The Oregon 22/Dallas-Rickreall Highway intersection was also included in the facility planning process. As the facility process progressed and various alternatives were reviewed, potential impacts to the unincorporated community of Rickreall and the Oregon 99W/Rickreall Road intersection were also assessed. The Oregon 22 and Oregon 99W corridors and the project study area are shown in Figure 1.1.1 Facility plans can serve a variety of purposes. In some cases, a facility plan is developed to address an outstanding planning issue or narrow the alternatives that are then advanced into the environmental documentation process required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In other cases, a facility plan process may also constitute the first phase of the formal NEPA or non-NEPA project development process. The purpose of the Rickreall Junction Facility Plan was to assess traffic and safety problems within the study area and identify potential solutions to these problems. This effort was a technical exercise to evaluate and screen alternatives prior to conducting project development. The operational feasibility of alternative solutions to identified problems through the year 2025 was the original focus of this effort. However, with the approval of construction funding for this project through the Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) in late 2001, this facility plan was expanded to include an Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) as required by Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 734-0051-0200.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Safety Manual Tigard Little League
    2021 Safety Manual Tigard Little League For Managers, Coaches, Players, and Parents Play Hard, Play Safe, Play Ball! Tigard Little League TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 2 City of Tigard Community 6 Mission Statement and Motto 7 Safety Letter from the League 8 Little League Safety Program 9 Board and Emergency Numbers 10 Background Checks 12 Child Abuse 13 Safe Kids Sport Act 16 Safety Manual & First Aid Kits 16 CPR & First Aid Training 18 Emergency Numbers 18 Tigard Little League Code of Conduct 19 Tigard Little League Safety Code 21 Tigard Little League Safety Responsibilities 24 President 24 Safety Officer 24 Managers & Coaches 25 Field Maintenance 27 Equipment Coordinator 28 Team Parent/ Team Safety Officer 28 Umpires 29 Tigard Little League Safety Manual - 2021 2 Tigard Little League Conditioning & Stretching 30 Suggestions for Warm-Up Drills 31 Regular Season Pitching Rules-Baseball 32 Regular Season Pitching Rules-Softball 35 Hydration 36 Equipment 37 Fundamental Training 38 Weather Conditions 39 Lightning 39 Rain 39 Hot Weather 40 Ultra-Violet Ray Exposure 41 General Facility 42 Accident Reporting Procedure 43 What to Report 43 When to Report 43 How to Make a Report 43 Returning to Play 44 Insurance Program 45 Child Abuse 41 Health & Medical-Giving First-Aid 47 What is First-Aid? 47 First Aid-Kits 47 AED Location 47 Good Samaritan Laws 48 Permission to Give Care 48 Treatment at Site – Some Important Do’s and Don’ts 49 When to Call 911 51 Hands Only CPR 53 Tigard Little League Safety Manual - 2021 3 Tigard Little League Prevention of Sports Injuries 54 Commotio Cordis 54 First-Aid for Commotio Cordis 54 Knee Injury 55 Muscle Soreness 55 Blisters 55 Side Stitch 55 Shin Splints 55 Achilles Tendon Pain 56 First-Aid for Sports Injuries 57 P.R.I.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • WILLOW BEND 9210 SW Center Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223
    FOR SALE WILLOW BEND 9210 SW Center Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Newly Remodeled • Owner Financing Available HUGH HOLTMAN | SENIOR ADVISOR [email protected] • Single Level O: 503.208.9393 | M: 503.799.0447 • Condo Platted www.svnimbrie.com • Great Entry Point into Multifamily Ownership • Fireplaces All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. PROPERTY DETAILS | WILLOW BEND | MULTIFAMILY | TIGARD, OREGON Sale Price: $1,150,000 Price per Unit: $164,286 Lot Size: 0.46 AC Building Size: 5,175 SF Property Type: Multifamily Units: 7 Year Built: 1969/2017 Submarket: Tigard Located in Tigard, OR, the Willow Bend apartments offer a nice entry level into apartment ownership. Recently remodeled from head to toe with a new composite roof, new decks, new cabinets, flooring, paint, etc. The property consists of (4) one bedroom units and (3) two bedroom units with plenty of off street parking. The property is fully leased and the owner is offering financing for a qualified buyer. Currently platted as condo's, this provides an investor an alternative exit strategy. Walk Score: 84 Transit Score: 50 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no responsibility for its correctness. ABOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD | WILLOW BEND | MULTIFAMILY | TIGARD, OREGON Tigard is a city in Washington County, Oregon. The population as of 2016 is 51,902. It is $402,700 51,902 the state’s 12th largest city and one of the fastest growing communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON $17,000,000 $8,655,000 General Obligation Bonds, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2011A Series 2011B
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 25, 2011 NEW ISSUE – Competitive Ratings: Moody’s Aa2 and S&P AA Book-Entry Only See “Ratings” herein In the opinion of K&L Gates LLP, Bond Counsel to the City (“Bond Counsel”), assuming compliance with certain covenants of the City, interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under existing law and interest on the Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individual and corporations; however, interest on the Bonds is included in adjusted current earnings for the purpose of computing the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations. See “Tax Matters” herein for a discussion of the opinion of Bond Counsel. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from Oregon personal income tax under existing law. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON $17,000,000 $8,655,000 General Obligation Bonds, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2011A Series 2011B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: Series A: June 1; Series B: December 1, as shown on inside cover The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A (the “2011A Bonds”) and the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011B (the “2011B Bonds”) (the “2011A Bonds” and with the “2011B Bonds”, collectively, the “Bonds”) will be issued by the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon (the “City”), in book-entry only form in denominations of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof. The Bonds are registered bonds issued in the name of CEDE & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Trails Master Plan Document
    Trails Plan FOR THE TUALATIN HILLS PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT OCTOBER 2006 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 13 Design Guidelines 19 Recommended Trail Network 51 Trail Funding Sources & Acquisition Strategies 89 Maintenance, Management, & Safety Guidelines 93 Appendix A Appendix B Acknowledgements THPRD Management Team Chris Wayland, Washington County Keith Hobson, Assistant General Manager Doug Menke, Assistant General Manager THPRD Staff Jim McElhinny, Director of Park & Recreation Services Steve Gulgren, Superintendent of Planning & Development THPRD Trails Advisory Committee Justin Patterson, Project Manager Wendy Kroger, Chair Sarah Cleek, Project Manager Barbara Sonniksen, Vice Chair Dave W. Brown, Secretary Prepared By: Kevin Apperson Alta Planning + Design Tom Hjort Mia Birk Joseph Barcott Mike Tresidder Leland Ascher Virginia Morgan Elisabeth Zeller Donna Stuhr In Association With: Cogan Owens Cogan Ex-Officio Members: Matt Hastie Steve Gulgren, THPRD Margaret Middleton, City of Beaverton Introduction Introduction Plan Overview Benefits of Trails Related Plans & Background Documents Goals & Objectives 2 destination. Trail users may include but are not limited to: bicyclists, non-motorized scooters, in-line skaters, users of other wheeled devices such as Segways or Plan electric assist-bicycles, roller skaters, wheelchair users (both non-motorized and motorized), strollers, Overview walkers, and runners. The Park District has many opportunities to enhance its existing trails system. Many of its parks and Trails offer numerous aesthetic and recreational greenspaces have their own internal circulation trails. opportunities, as well as commuter options for Some of them have been formally developed and others traveling to and from destinations in the Tualatin Hills have been created by user demand, where people have Park and Recreation District (Park District).
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notes 1999-01-14 [Part B]
    Portland State University PDXScholar Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 1-14-1999 Meeting Notes 1999-01-14 [Part B] Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation, "Meeting Notes 1999-01-14 [Part B] " (1999). Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation. 260. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact/260 This Minutes is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. DRAFT 1998 OREGON HIGHWAY PLAN Public Hearing Draft January 1999 Oregon Department of Transportation Planning Section Statewide Mobility Unit Investment Policy The state highway system will need $29.1 billion for preserving the existing system and making feasible improvements during the next 20 years. Projected state revenues at the present tax rate and federal revenues including projected increases will bring in $13.9 billion over the next 20 years, leaving a revenue gap of $15.2 billion. In recognition of this gap, the Plan's investment policy places the highest priority for making investments in the state highway system on safety and managing and preserving the physical infrastructure. The Plan would manage and preserve existing infrastructure at least at 1998 levels before adding new facilities. The second priority is to invest to improve infrastructure conditions and to add new facilities or capacity to address critical safety problems, critical levels of congestion and/or desirable economic development.
    [Show full text]