Rickreall Interchange Area Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rickreall Interchange Area Management Plan CHAPTER 1 Background 1.1 Transportation Facility Plan Purpose This report documents the results of the transportation facility planning process conducted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for the intersection of Oregon Route 22 and Oregon Route 99W at Rickreall. The Oregon 22/Dallas-Rickreall Highway intersection was also included in the facility planning process. As the facility process progressed and various alternatives were reviewed, potential impacts to the unincorporated community of Rickreall and the Oregon 99W/Rickreall Road intersection were also assessed. The Oregon 22 and Oregon 99W corridors and the project study area are shown in Figure 1.1.1 Facility plans can serve a variety of purposes. In some cases, a facility plan is developed to address an outstanding planning issue or narrow the alternatives that are then advanced into the environmental documentation process required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In other cases, a facility plan process may also constitute the first phase of the formal NEPA or non-NEPA project development process. The purpose of the Rickreall Junction Facility Plan was to assess traffic and safety problems within the study area and identify potential solutions to these problems. This effort was a technical exercise to evaluate and screen alternatives prior to conducting project development. The operational feasibility of alternative solutions to identified problems through the year 2025 was the original focus of this effort. However, with the approval of construction funding for this project through the Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) in late 2001, this facility plan was expanded to include an Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) as required by Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 734-0051-0200. The conclusions in this document have provided direction to the project development process by defining the key features of the alternative that has been chosen for construction. This report also provides a basis for the ODOT to work with Polk County to amend its Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Systems Plan (TSP) and Zoning Ordinance. These amendments will acknowledge the project development decisions that have been made and the short- and long-term facility management approach (including Polk County land use decisions) that will be implemented to help protect the function of these improvements through the 20-year planning horizon. This project recommendation made by this facility plan defines the alternative that is now included in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as a result of the OTIA process. However, the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) made the OTIA approval with several conditions prior to granting construction approval. These conditions are addressed by this facility plan. 1-1 1.2 Facility Plan Context The Oregon Transportation Plan (OTP) sets broad policies for the state transportation system. Included are policies and action steps intended to improve rural highways. Overall, the intent of the OTP is to guide future development and ensure a safe, convenient, and efficient transportation system throughout the state in order to promote economic prosperity and livability for all Oregonians. The Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) designates Oregon 22 as having a Statewide Level of Importance (LOI). Oregon 22 has also been designated by the OTC as an expressway and is included as part of the National Highway System. Expressways are a subset of Statewide, Regional, and District LOI highways that are intended to provide a high level of mobility for longer distance travelers. The OHP designates Oregon 99W as having a Regional LOI. Based on LOI designations, the OHP defines specific standards for state highways, including mobility standards, interchange spacing requirements, investment priorities, and access control standards. The operational performance and mobility standards in the OHP can vary by location and adjacent land use type. ODOT corridor-level plans and local Transportation Systems Plans (TSP) define the existing conditions and future improvements necessary to support land use plans 20 years into the future and implement the OHP and other ODOT modal plans. ODOT’s Oregon 22 Corridor Strategy (West) identified the Oregon 22 and Oregon 99W and Oregon 22 and Dallas-Rickreall Highway intersections as areas that needed further solution development work. This corridor strategy covered the portion of Oregon 22 from its intersection with Oregon 18 at Willamina to the Deer Park/Gaffen Road Interchange approximately four miles east of Interstate 5. These recommendations were further supported by a corridor safety analysis performed in 1999. The Polk County TSP identifies both Oregon 22 and Oregon 99W as principal arterials in the County road system. It identifies a number of possible road construction projects including the construction of an interchange at the Oregon 22/Oregon 99W intersection. The TSP states that the county will work with ODOT on any necessary studies related to these projects. This facility plan is ODOT’s first step in the project development process needed to meet the OTIA objectives. Where this facility plan fits within the ODOT’s hierarchy of planning, programming, and project development processes is shown in Figure 1.2.1. 1-2 INSERT FIGURE 1.1.1—Map in a map showing project study area and corridors 1-3 1-4 Oregon Transportation Plan Mode/Topic Plans MPO Plans City/County Transportation System Plans Facility Plans (including refinement, corridor, interchange management, and other plans) Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Solution Delivery Environmental Document Project Development - Right-of-way (ROW) - Final Design Construction FIGURE 1.2.1 - ODOT Planning, Programming, and Project Development Context 1-5 1.3 Facility Plan Process This facility plan process consisted of the following phases: Technical Advisory Committee Formation - A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was formed to develop the facility plan. The TAC consisted of federal, state, and local representatives including Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) staff, ODOT staff, Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) staff, MWVCOG staff, and representatives from Polk County and the City of Dallas. The TAC was responsible for developing project goals and problem statement, data collection and analysis, alternative identification and evaluation, and recommendations. The TAC meeting summaries are included as Appendix A. Scoping and Inventory - The TAC conducted a review of all existing plans, policies, and study documentation related to the existing intersection to identify pertinent policies and determine data collection needs. Conditions Assessment - The TAC conducted analysis and validation of existing operating and geometric conditions; development of future traffic volumes; and analysis of operating conditions assuming the existing geometric conditions remain in place. From these assessments, deficiencies are identified. Alternative Identification - The TAC identified a range of improvement alternatives and conducted screening to select the most feasible alternatives for evaluation. Alternative Evaluation - The TAC evaluated the operational performance and geometric feasibility of the selected alternatives using the traffic volumes for the years 2015 and 2025. Stakeholder Input - The project team conducted a series of meetings with key stakeholders. These included Rickreall community residents and local business owners, officials from Dallas, Monmouth, and Independence, local legislators, Dallas School District personnel, and emergency response personnel. The purpose of the meetings was to review preliminary evaluation results and improvement concepts and receive stakeholder feedback. The stakeholder outreach process culminated with an open house at the Polk County Fairgrounds in June 2002. The acceptability of the project concept recommended by this facility plan was affirmed at this open house. Additional public input can also be provided through the Polk County and OTC adoption processes. Facility Plan Preparation - The project team prepared the facility plan including documenting the previous steps, investment requirements, and recommendations for adoption. Figure 1.3.1 illustrates the facility plan process. 1-6 Scoping & Inventory Alternative Rickreall Junction Recommendations Facility Plan Condition Assessment Polk County Stakeholder Adoption Input Which alternatives Alternative best address Identification the identified YES problems? OTC Adoption Alternative Evaluation Project Development Is alternative feasible? Alternative Dismissed NO Figure 1.3.1 - Facility Plan Process Flowchart 1-7 1.4 Transportation Context 1.4.1 Oregon 22 Characteristics and History The Oregon 22 transportation corridor extends for approximately 140 miles, beginning at the intersection with US Highway 101 in Hebo and terminating at Santiam Junction where it intersects with Oregon 20. Between Salem and Willamina, the corridor primarily runs through farmland with little development occurring outside of Salem. Oregon 22 is of critical importance to a wide range of statewide, regional, and local users and is designated as a highway of statewide importance from Valley Junction to Santiam Junction. The highway serves as the primary route connecting the Salem-Keizer Metropolitan Area and the mid-Willamette Valley to the Oregon Coast, providing connections to Lincoln City and Tillamook. It is also a major connecting route from the
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Business Meeting Agenda – March 10, 2016
    AGENDA Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 10:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Beginning Board Order No. 2016-26 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance I. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (The Chair of the Board will call for statements from citizens regarding issues relating to County government. It is the intention that this portion of the agenda shall be limited to items of County business which are properly the object of Board consideration and may not be of a personal nature. Persons wishing to speak shall be allowed to do so after registering on the blue card provided on the table outside of the hearing room prior to the beginning of the meeting. Testimony is limited to three (3) minutes. Comments shall be respectful and courteous to all.) II. PUBLIC HEARING (The following items will be individually presented by County staff or other appropriate individuals. Persons appearing shall clearly identify themselves and the department or organization they represent. In addition, a synopsis of each item, together with a brief statement of the action being requested shall be made by those appearing on behalf of an agenda item.) 1. First Reading of Ordinance No. _____ Amending Chapter 6.06, Parks Rules of the Clackamas County Code (Rick Gruen, Business and Community Services) III. CONSENT AGENDA (The following Items are considered to be routine, and therefore will not be allotted individual discussion time on the agenda. Many of these items have been discussed by the Board in Work Sessions. The items on the Consent Agenda will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item considered at its regular place on the agenda.) A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 OREGON HIGHWAY PLAN Including Amendments November 1999 Through May 2015
    1999 OREGON HIGHWAY PLAN Including amendments November 1999 through May 2015 An Element of the Oregon Transportation Plan THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Copyright © 1999 by the Oregon Department of Transportation Permission is given to quote and reproduce parts of this document if credit is given to the source. A copy of this plan and amendments as the Oregon Transportation Commission adopted them are on file at the Oregon Department of Transportation and online at: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Pages/Plans.aspx#OHP. Editorial changes for consistency have been made in this document. Amendments Incorporated into May 2015 version of 1999 OHP 99-01: Highway Reclassification (9 November 1999) 00-02: Expressway Classification (11 May 2000) 00-03: Expressway Classifications and Technical Corrections (7 June 2000) 00-04: Alternate Mobility Standards; RVMPO and Metro (13 December 2000) 01-05: Expressway Classifications (11 April 2001) 01-06: Conditional Designation of STAs and Designation of UBAs (9 August 2001) 02-07: Jurisdictional Transfers (November 2002) 03-08: Bypass Policy (16 April 2003) 03-09: Amendment of Appendix E: NHS Intermodal Connectors (18 June 2003) 04-10: Amended Policy 1B (14 January 2004) 04-11: Highway Segment Designations (14 January 2004) 04-11: Highway Segment Designation Maps (14 January 2004) 04-12: Technical Corrections to the Oregon Highway Plan (2 July 2004) 04-13: Technical Corrections to the Oregon Highway Plan (20 December 2004) 05-14: Designation of Special Transportation Areas (10 January 2005)
    [Show full text]
  • The Dinner Meeting Will Be Held at the Mcminnville Civic Hall and Will Begin at 6:00 P.M
    CITY COUNCIL MEETING McMinnville, Oregon AGENDA McMINNVILLE CIVIC HALL June 28, 2016 200 NE SECOND STREET 6:00 p.m. – Work Session 7:00 p.m. – Regular Council Meeting Welcome! All persons addressing the Council will please use the table at the front of the Board Room. All testimony is electronically recorded. Public participation is encouraged. If you desire to speak on any agenda item, please raise your hand to be recognized after the Mayor calls the item. If you wish to address Council on any item not on the agenda, you may respond as the Mayor calls for “Invitation to Citizens for Public Comment.” NOTE: The Dinner Meeting will be held at the McMinnville Civic Hall and will begin at 6:00 p.m. This will be a Work Session to hear the presentation from the Police Department's Investigation Team. CITY MANAGER'S SUMMARY MEMO a. City Manager's Summary Memorandum b. Work Session Informational Materials CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVITATION TO CITIZENS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT – The Mayor will announce that any interested audience members are invited to provide comments. Anyone may speak on any topic other than: 1) a topic already on the agenda; 2) a matter in litigation, 3) a quasi judicial land use matter; or, 4) a matter scheduled for public hearing at some future date. The Mayor may limit the duration of these comments. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Consider the Minutes of the March 22, 2016 Joint McMinnville City Council / Water & Light and Regular City Council Meetings b. Resolution No. 2016 - 32: Declaring the City's election to receive state revenues c.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Testimony Transportation Funding Task Force Meeting 15 December, 11Th 2019
    Written Testimony Transportation Funding Task Force Meeting 15 December, 11th 2019 Sent: Wed 11/20/2019 From: Jackson Calhoun <[email protected]> Subject: Testimony for T2020 task force meeting T2020 Task Force Testimony Jackson Calhoun Wednesday, November 20, 2019 My name is Jackson Calhoun. I am 15 years old, and I am a sophomore at Rex Putnam High School. I Ride to school every day. My ride is a battle between the bike lane and my bike. A battle to avoid trash cans, gravel, blackberry vines hanging down into the bike lane, roots, bumps and giant leaf piles that could cause me to crash if I were to run into them. A few weeks ago I ran into the king of the evil blackberry vines. It scratched up my rain jacket and shocked me greatly. And a few days ago I almost ran into a trash can! Luckily I didn’t crash. My bike ride to tonight’s meeting was not very safe - while the new Trolley Trail is nice, most of Clackamas County is very difficult for bike riders. It took me an extra 20 minutes to get to the MAX station because of the lack of service in Clackamas county. Yet, I braved the long journey, darkness, miserable traffic, transit fare, the treacherous roads lacking bike lanes and sidewalks today because my future is on the line, and I’m tired of my elected officials pretending that they are speaking for me and my classmates when they are really more interested in money, attention and photo ops. How convenient it is, then, that the adults in this room sitting around this table have the opportunity to demand that Clackamas County gets the transit, biking and walking investments it deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Square Regional Center Implementation Plan
    WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT TASK FORCE MEMBERS Tom Archer, Spieker Properties (Equity Office) Dr. Gene Davis, Property Owner David Drescher, Fans of Fanno Creek Kimberly Fuller, Spieker Properties (Equity Office) Nic Herriges, Nimbus Business Commuters Carl Hosticka, Metro Council (District #3) Ron Hudson, Tigard-Tualatin School District Leo Huff, Oregon Dept. of Transportation Kathy Lehtola, Washington County Dan McFarling, Association of Oregon Rail and Transit Advocates Robert Mixon, Bicycle Transportation Alliance Lyndon Musolf, Lyn Musolf & Associates Michael Neunzert, Metzger Resident Adele Newton, Washington County League of Women Voters Nawzad Othman, OTAK Steve Perry, Metzger Resident Lynn Peterson, Tri-Met Jack Reardon, Washington Square Mall Rick Saito, Group Mackenzie Ken Scheckla, Tigard City Council Forrest Soth, Beaverton City Council Ted Spence, Tigard Resident Dave Stewart, Citizens for Sensible Transportation Pat Whiting, Citizen Participation Organization (CPO) 4-M Nick Wilson, Tigard Planning Commission WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT June 29, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director Nadine Smith, Project Manager Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner Beth St. Amand, Assistant PREPARED BY: Spencer & Kupper, Project Management with Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. URS/BRW, Inc. Deirdre Steinberg Communications This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), local government, and State of Oregon funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Existing Conditions REVISED
    DATE: April 16, 2020 TO: Michael Weston, City of King City FROM: Sadie DiNatale and Matt Craigie, ECONorthwest SUBJECT: Existing Land Use Conditions and Future Baseline Report – REVISED DRAFT The City of King City contracted DKS, and several subconsultants including ECONorthwest, to develop a Transportation System Plan and Land Use Refinement. This memorandum is one of several deliverables for the project. This document addresses Task 4A in the project’s Scope of Work—the “Land Use Existing Conditions and Future Baseline Report.” URA 6D: Existing Land Use Conditions Purpose of the Memorandum The purpose of this memorandum is to provide land use context for King City’s Transportation System Plan and Land Use Refinement project. Specifically, it aims to explain the historic, present, and likely future land use conditions of King City’s urban expansion area (URA 6D) and its immediate vicinity to inform the market analysis component of the TSP project. To do so, it summarizes previous analyses, reports and studies; it does not present new analysis. Ultimately, the data summarized in this memorandum will serve as a baseline for the area’s future Master Plan. The Master Plan would include Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Amendments. This memorandum acknowledges that cities adjacent to King City are similarly planning for growth by developing Town Center and Neighborhood Center plans. This memorandum describes those plans to provide background on nearby areas that may influence development in URA 6D. Background King City is a small city located inside Metro’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The City sits along Oregon Route 99W, between the cities of Tigard and Sherwood.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Scientific Investigations Map 3027, Back
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3027 GEOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS within the Juan de Fuca Plate. Beneath Puget Sound, the Juan de LIFELINE VULNERABILITY TO EARTH- Electrical Power Facilities Fuca Plate reaches a depth of 40-60 km and begins to bend even Despite the lack of recent, large, damaging earthquakes, more steeply downward, forming a “knee” (see cross section in QUAKES Regional electrical power systems were out of service earth scientists now understand that earthquake hazards in the fig. 1). The knee is the location where the largest intraplate zone following the 1995 Kobe, 1994 Northridge, and 1989 Loma The vulnerability of lifeline systems to earthquakes is Portland/Vancouver are greater than previously known. This earthquakes occur, such as the 1949 and 2001 events beneath Prieta earthquakes. Such failures are often due to self-protecting related to the type and condition of structures and to the severity may seem at odds with the experience of long-time residents of Olympia, Washington, and the 1965 event beneath the Seattle- features that are engineered into the system and can often be of the earthquake. Lifeline system building structures are Oregon and Washington who can recall only the large earth- Tacoma International Airport in Seatac, Washington. restored within 24 to 72 hours. Many of the power failures in the vulnerable to earthquake shaking, just as are residential and quakes farther north in Olympia, Washington, in 1949 and The same mechanisms that cause deep earthquakes Seattle area during the 2001 Nisqually earthquake were of this commercial building structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Taste Newberg, the Official Travel Resource for Newberg, Oregon Visitor-Facing Businesses Are Open, Welcoming Local Guests to the Willamette Valley
    Introducing Taste Newberg, the Official Travel Resource for Newberg, Oregon Visitor-facing businesses are open, welcoming local guests to the Willamette Valley Newberg, Oregon (June 29, 2020) — Taste Newberg, the official travel resource for Newberg, ​ ​ Oregon, recently launched a consumer-facing website for visitors to the destination, providing timely ​ information and itinerary ideas for local travel. Newberg, the gateway to Oregon’s Willamette Valley ​ wine country, located only 30 minutes from Portland, has reopened warmly but also cautiously to ​ ​ local visitors, taking all possible precautions to ensure the safety of guests and residents. New businesses ​ have opened their doors and others have renovated and refurbished during the months-long closure this spring (see “What’s New in Newberg” section below). ​ ​ The summer months in Newberg promise plenty of opportunities for outdoor adventure, dining, wine tasting, gallery hopping, and more — including one of the nation’s last remaining drive-in movie theaters. Newberg’s walkable downtown is lined with independent shops, winery tasting rooms, cafés, and ​ restaurants. The local open-air Wednesday Market hosts more than 35 vendors from Newberg and its ​ ​ surrounding farmland. Newberg also lies within easy access to the Willamette Valley Water Trail, one of ​ ​ ​ only 20 National Water Trails in the U.S., providing canoe and paddleboard access to more than 180 ​ scenic miles of the mainstream Willamette River. More than 100 wineries lie within a short drive from Newberg’s Main Street, offering tastings by ​ appointment and catering to small groups. Many wineries have expanded their outdoor options: Styring ​ Vineyards, for example, launched BYO picnics and wine flights overlooking their expansive vineyard.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Willamette Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Middle Willamette Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan October 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Middle Willamette Local Advisory Committee with support from the Benton and Polk Soil and Water Conservation Districts Oregon Dept. of Agriculture Benton SWCD Polk SWCD Water Quality Program 456 SW Monroe Avenue 580 Main Street 635 Capitol St. NE Corvallis, OR 97333 Dallas, OR 97338 Salem, OR 97301 (541) 753-7208 (503) 623-9680 (503) 986-4700 www.bentonswcd.org www.polkswcd.com Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms .............................................................................................................. iii Foreword ................................................................................................................................... 5 Required Elements of Area Plans............................................................................................ 5 Plan Content ............................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ................................................................. 7 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans. 7 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program ................................................................ 7 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXT AND SCALE ON INDIVDIUAL ACCESSIBILITY: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joseph Weber, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 2001 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Mei-Po Kwan, Adviser Professor Morton O’Kelly Adviser Professor W.
    [Show full text]
  • Oigon Historic Tpms REPORT I
    ‘:. OIGoN HIsToRIc TPms REPORT I ii Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council May, 1998 h I Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents . Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon’s Historic Trails 7 C Oregon’s National Historic Trails 11 C Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail 13 Oregon National Historic Trail 27 Applegate National Historic Trail 47 a Nez Perce National Historic Trail 63 C Oregon’s Historic Trails 75 Kiamath Trail, 19th Century 77 o Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 87 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, 1832/1834 99 C Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1833/1834 115 o Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 129 Whitman Mission Route, 1841-1847 141 c Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 183 o Meek Cutoff, 1845 199 o Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 o Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 C General recommendations 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 247 4Xt C’ Executive summary C The Board of Directors and staff of the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council present the Oregon Historic Trails Report, the first step in the development of a statewide Oregon Historic C Trails Program. The Oregon Historic Trails Report is a general guide and planning document that will help future efforts to develop historic trail resources in Oregon. o The objective of the Oregon Historic Trails Program is to establish Oregon as the nation’s leader in developing historic trails for their educational, recreational, and economic values. The Oregon Historic Trails Program, when fully implemented, will help preserve and leverage C existing heritage resources while promoting rural economic development and growth through C heritage tourism.
    [Show full text]