DOCSLIB.ORG

References.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REFERENCES (References to primary articles examined in chapters 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10 are provided in end-of-chapter reference lists and appendices or are mentioned in passing within the text.) Abt, Helmut A. “Some Trends in American Astronomical Publications.” Publica- tions of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 93 (1981): 269-73. Agassi, Joseph. Faraday as a Natural Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976. Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2. Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1960. Aristotle. Rhetoric. Tr. Lane Cooper. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1932. Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962. Bacon, Francis. The Advancement of Learning. London, 1603. Bacon, Francis. Magna Instauratio. London, 1620. Bachelard, G. Le Materialisme Rationnel. Paris: PUF, 1953. Baddam. Memoirs of the Royal Society, vol. 1. London, 1738. Baldauf, R. B., and B. H. Jernudd. “Language of Publications as a Variable in Scientific Communication.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 6 (1983): 97-108. Barnes, Barry, Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974, Barnes, Barry, and Steven Shapin. Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979. Barnes, Sherman B. “The Editing of Early Learned Journals.” Osiris I (1936): 155-72. Bazerman, Charles. “How Natural Philosophers Can Cooperate.” In Text and Profession, ed. Bazerman and Paradis, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, forthcoming. Bazerman, Charles. The Informed Writer. 3d edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989. Bazerman, Charles. “Scientific Writing as a Social Act.” In New Essays in Tech- nical Writing and Communication, ed. Anderson, Brockmann, and Miller. Farmingdale: Baywood, 1983: 154-84. Bazerman, Charles. “Studies of Scientific Writing: E Pluribus Unum?” 4S Review 3, 2 (1985): 13-20. Beach, Richard, and Lillian Bridwell. New Directions in Composition Research. New York: Guilford, 1984. 333 References Becher, Tony. “Disciplinary Discourse .” Studies in Higher Education 12 (1987): 261-74. Bechler, Zev. ” ‘A Less Agreeable Matter’: The Disagreeable Case of Newton and Achromatic Refraction.” British Journal for the History of Science 8 (1975): 101-26. Bechler, Zev. “Newtons Search for a Mechanistic Model of Colour Dispersion: A Suggested Interpretation.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 11 (1973): l-37. Behn, Aphra. The Emperor in the Moon. Works, vol. 3. London: Heinnemann, 1915. Bellone, Enrico. A World on Paper. Cambridge: MIT, 1980. Ben-David, Joseph. The Scientist's Role in Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974. Biddle, Bruce, and E. Thomas. Role Theory: Concepts and Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966. Birch, Thomas. The History of the Royal Society. London, 1746. Bitzer, Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1(1968): l-14. Bizzell, Patricia. “Cognition, Convention, and Certainty: What We Need to Know About Writing.” Pre/Text 3 (1982): 213-43. Bleich, David. Subjective Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978. Bloor, David. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976. Brannigan, Augustine. The Social Basis of Scientific Discovery. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1981. Brown, Richard. A Poetic for Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977 Bruce, Bertram. A Social Interaction Model of Reading. Research Report 218. Urbana, 111.: Center for the Study of Reading, 1481. Bruner, Jerome. “The Ontogenesis of Speech Acts.” Journal of Child Language 2: l-20. Butler, Samuel. “Elephant in the Moon” and “On the Royal Society.”" Genuine Remains in Verse and Prose. London, 1759. Callon, Michel, John Law, and Arie Rip, eds. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan, 1986. Cattell, J. M., and J. Cattell, eds. American Men of Science. 4th ed. New York: Science Press, 1927 Chomsky, Noam. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1968. Chubin, Daryl, and S. Moitra. “Content Analysis of References.” Social Studies of Science 5 (1975) : 423-41. Clifford, J. “On Ethnographic Authority,” Representations l(1982): 118-46. Cohen. I. B. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. Cohen, I. B., ed. Isaac Newton’s Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy. Cam- bridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. 335 References Cohen, Ralph. “History and Genre.” New Literary History 17, 2 (1986): 203-19. Cohen, Robert, and Thomas Schnelle. Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986. Cole, Jonathan, and Steven Cole. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1973. Collins, Harry. “The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: Studies of Contempo- rary Science .” Annual Review of Sociology (1983): 265-85. Collins, Harry. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Bev- erly Hills: Sage, 1985. Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch. Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982. Collins, Randall. “On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology.” American Jour- nal of Sociology 86 (1981): 984-1014. Consigny, Scott. “Rhetoric and Its Situations.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 7 (1974): 175-86. Cooper, Marilyn. “The Ecology of Writing.” College English 48 (1986): 364-75. Coser, Rose Laub. “Role Distance, Sociological Ambivalence, and Transitional Status Systems.” American Journal of Sociology 72 (1966): 173-87 Cozens, Susan. “Comparing the Sciences: Citation Context Analysis of Papers from Neuropharmacology and the Sociology of Science.” Social Studies of Science 15 (1985): 127-53. Cozens, Susan. “The Life History of a Knowledge Claim: The Opiate Receptor Case.” Paper delivered at the meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Atlanta, November 1981. Cozzens, Susan. “Taking the Measure of Science: A Review of Citation Theo- ries.” International Society for the Sociology of Knowledge Newsletter, March 1981. Crane, Diana. Invisible Colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972. Crick, F. H. C., and J. D. Watson. “The Complementary Structure of Deox- yribonucleic Acid.” Proceedings of the Royal Society. A223 (1954): 80-96. Crosland, Maurice. “Explicit Qualifications as a Criterion for Membership in the Royal Society: A Historical Review.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 37 (1982): 167-87. Crystal, David, and Derek Davy. Investigating English Style. London: Longmans, 1969. Day, Robert. How to Write a Scientific Paper. Philadelphia: ISI, 1983. Dear, Peter. “Totius in Verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society.” Isis 76 (1985): 145-61. Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Bal- timore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977. Dictionary of Scientific Biography. New York: Scribners, 1970-80. DiMaggio, Paul. “Classification in Art .” American Sociological Review 52 (1987): 440-55. Dolezal, Frederic Thomas. The Lexicographical and Lexicological Procedures and Methods of John Wilkins. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Cham- paign, 1983. 334 References Dubrow, Heather. Genre. London: Methuen, 1982. Eastwood, B. “Descartes on Refraction: Scientific versus Rhetorical Method.” Isis 75 (1984): 481-502. Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979. Ede, Lisa. “Audience: An Introduction to Research.” College Composition and Communication 35 (1984) : 140-54. Edge, David. “Is There Too Much Sociology of Science?” Isis 74 (1983): 250-56. Eisenstein, Elizabeth. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. 2 vols. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1979. Ennis, M. “The Design and Presentation of Informational Material,” Journal of Research Communication Studies 2 (1980): 67-82. Fabian, J. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983, Fahnestock, Jeanne. “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Cummunicatiun 3 (1986): 275-96. Faigley Lester. “Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal.” College English 48 (1986): 275-96. Faigley, Lester, Roger Cherry, David Jolliffe, and Anna Skinner. Assessing Writ- ers’ Knowledge and Processes of Composing. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex, 1985. Fear, David. Technical Communication. Glenview, 111.: Scott Foresman, 1977. Finocchario, M. A. Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 61. Dor- drecht: D. Reidel, 1980. Firth, J. R. Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press, 1957. Fleck, Ludwik. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979. Flower, Linda, and Richard Hayes. “The Pregnant Pause; An Inquiry into the Nature of Planning .” Research in the Teaching of English 15 (1983): 229-43. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon, 1970. Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982. Fox, Theodore. Crisis in Communication. London: Athlone Press, 1965. Frank, Joseph. Beginnings of the English Newspaper, 1620-1660. Cambridge: Har- vard University Press, 1961. Garfinkel, Harold. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1967.
Recommended publications
  • Miguel García-Sancho Talks with Karin Knorr Cetina

    Miguel García-Sancho Talks with Karin Knorr Cetina

    Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4 (2018), 246-266 DOI:10.17351/ests2018.239 “These Were Not Boring Meetings”: Miguel García-Sancho Talks with Karin Knorr Cetina MIGUEL GARCÍA-SANCHO1 UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH KARIN KNORR CETINA2 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Abstract In this interview, Karin Knorr Cetina evokes the first Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science at Cornell University in 1976 as a foundational moment for science and technology studies (STS). This conference consolidated a new approach to the study of science based on the anthropological observation of scientists at work in the laboratory. Knorr Cetina argues that, despite geographically cementing in the United States, this approach originated mainly through the work of European scholars. The years that followed the Cornell meeting were marked by intense debates between the defenders of this anthropological approach and other scholars more focused on ideas than on scientific practice. Knorr Cetina describes these debates as “bloodbaths” and recalls having first coined the term “constructivist” as applied to science studies in 1977. For Knorr Cetina, STS is now shifting its attention from the production to the consumption of technoscientific knowledge. Her current interest in the financial markets and other forms of screen technologies is an example of this transition. She argues that STS needs to overcome its current fragmentation and emphasis in isolated case studies. The establishment of basic research centers with the financial resources to develop collective and long-term programs would help scholars to expand their horizons. In his following reflection, Miguel García-Sancho explores the connections between STS and travel in both a sense of intellectual shift and a more mundane meaning of physical movement.
  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists Author(S): Thomas F

    Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists Author(S): Thomas F

    Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists Author(s): Thomas F. Gieryn Source: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 6 (Dec., 1983), pp. 781-795 Published by: American Sociological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095325 . Accessed: 20/10/2014 20:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.173.127.127 on Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:34:19 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions BOUNDARY-WORK AND THE DEMARCATION OF SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE: STRAINS AND INTERESTS IN PROFESSIONAL IDEOLOGIES OF SCIENTISTS* THOMAS F. GIERYN Indiana University The demarcation of science from other intellectual activities-long an analytic problemfor philosophersand sociologists-is here examinedas a practicalproblem for scientists. Construction of a boundary between science and varieties of non-science is useful for scientists' pursuit of professional goals: acquisition of intellectual authority and career opportunities; denial of these resources to "pseudoscientists"; and protection of the autonomy of scientific research from political interference.
  • Poetry That Expresses Thoughts and Emotions of a Single Speaker

    Poetry That Expresses Thoughts and Emotions of a Single Speaker

    Type of writing done in verse form that Poetry uses figures of speech designed to appeal to emotions and imagination Poetry that expresses Lyric Poetry thoughts and emotions of a single speaker Poetry that tells a story Narrative Poetry Form and Structure Poem that is song-like; usually focuses Ballad on topics such as romance, adventure, and death; and tells a story Sonnet 14 line lyric poem A mourning poem; written for Elegy someone who has died Lyric poem on a serious subject; usually Ode addressed to one person or thing; often celebrates something a repeated sound, word, Refrain phrase, line, or group of lines Japanese 3 lined poem with 5 Haiku syllables in lines 1 and 3 and 7 syllables in line 2 Couplet two consecutive lines of poetry that rhyme Triplets Three lined stanza Quatrains 4 line stanzas poetry that doesn’t have a set Free Verse rhyme scheme or meter A very long narrative poem that tells of Epic the life and journeys of a hero A group of consecutive lines in a Stanza poem that forms a single unit; like paragraphs Figurative Language comparison between two unlike Simile things, using a word such as like, as, than, or resembles comparison between two unlike things that does not use a Metaphor connecting word a group of words not meant to Idiom be taken literally overstating something, usually Hyperbole for the purpose of creating a comic effect giving human characteristics to Personification an object or an animal contradictory elements (two Oxymoron things that do not belong together) use of language that appeals to Imagery
  • Malte Ziewitz Talks with Michael Lynch Keywords

    Malte Ziewitz Talks with Michael Lynch Keywords

    Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4 (2018), 366-385 DOI:10.17351/ests2018.220 It’s Important to Go to the Laboratory: Malte Ziewitz Talks with Michael Lynch MALTE ZIEWITZ1 CORNELL UNIVERSITY MICHAEL LYNCH2 CORNELL UNIVERSITY Abstract Why would anyone still want to go to the laboratory in 2018? In this interview, Michael Lynch answers this and other questions, reflecting on his own journey in, through, and alongside the field of science and technology studies (STS). Starting from his days as a student of Harold Garfinkel’s at UCLA to more recent times as editor of Social Studies of Science, Lynch talks about the rise of origin stories in the field; the role of ethnomethodology in his thinking; the early days of laboratory studies; why “turns” and “waves” might better be called “spins”; what he learned from David Edge; why we should be skeptical of the presumption that STS enhances the democratization of science; and why it might be time to “blow up STS”––an appealing idea that Malte Ziewitz takes up in his reflection following the interview. Keywords history of STS; Michael Lynch; interview; laboratory; ethnomethodology; parasites; explosive STS MZ The field of STS now seems to be at a point where people enjoy a good origin story. Do you have one you would like to share? ML I’ll give you one that’s very familiar, which gives a lot of credit to Edinburgh. I think there’s a solid basis for this story, certainly other people will tell a different one and we all know that these things are constructed in light of where we are in the present.
  • An Application of Bayesian Model Averaging with Rural Crime Data ______

    An Application of Bayesian Model Averaging with Rural Crime Data ______

    International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, Vol. 4, No. 2, December 2011, 683-717 Model Uncertainty in Ecological Criminology: An Application of Bayesian Model Averaging With Rural Crime Data ___________________________________________________________________________________ Steven C. Dellera Lindsay Amielb Melissa Dellerc Abstract In this study we explore the use of Bayesian model averaging (BMA) to address model uncertainty in identifying the determinants of Midwestern rural crime rates using county level data averaged over 2006-07-08. The empirical criminology literature suffers from serious model uncertainty: theory states that everything matters and there are multiple ways to measure key variables.By using the BMA approach we identify variables that appear to most consistently influence rural crime patterns. We find that there are several variables that rise to the top in explaining different types of crime as well as numerous variables that influence only certain types of crime. Introduction The empirical ecological criminology literature is vast and richly interdisciplinary. But there are at least three problem areas that have created significant confusion over the policy implications of this literature. First, the theoretical literature basically concludes that “everything matters” which makes empirical investigations difficult specifically related to model uncertainty. Second, there is sufficient fragility within the empirical results to cast a pall over the literature (Chiricos, 1987; Patterson, 1991; Fowles and Merva, 1996; Barnett and Mencken, 2002; Bausman and Goe, 2004; Chrisholm and Choe, 2004; Messner, Baumer and Rosenfeld, 2004; Phillips, 2006; Authors). Donohue and Wolfers (2005) along with Cohen-Cole, Durlauf, Fagan and Nagin (2009) note, for example, that the extensive empirical literature seeking to test the deterrent effect of capital punishment has yield nothing but contradictory and inconclusive results.
  • The Verse Dramas of TS Eliot

    The Verse Dramas of TS Eliot

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1959 Search for form| the verse dramas of T. S. Eliot Carol Sue Rometch The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Rometch, Carol Sue, "Search for form| the verse dramas of T. S. Eliot" (1959). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3500. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3500 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SEARCH FOR FORM; THE VERSE DRAMAS OF T.S. ELIOT by CAROL SUE ROMETCH B.A. Whitman College, 1957 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1959 Approved by; GhfiHrman, Boàrd of Examiners Dean, Graduate School WAY 2 8 1959 Date UMI Number: EP35735 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ütaMitatton PlAMiing UMI EP35735 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
  • Bourdieu and Latour in STS: “Let’S Leave Aside All the Facts for a While”

    Bourdieu and Latour in STS: “Let’S Leave Aside All the Facts for a While”

    Bourdieu and Latour in STS: “Let’s Leave Aside All the Facts for A While” by Lee Claiborne Nelson M.A., Aarhus University, 2011 B.A., Dalhousie University, 2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Science and Technology Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2014 © Lee Claiborne Nelson, 2014 Abstract Through the lens of the English-speaking Science and Technology Studies (STS) community, the relationship between Pierre Bourdieu and Bruno Latour has remained semi-opaque. This thesis problematizes the Anglo understanding of the Bourdieu-Latour relationship and unsettles the resolve that maintains the distance that STS has kept from Bourdieu. Despite many similarities between these two scholars, Bourdieu has remained a distant figure to STS despite his predominance in disciplines from which STS frequently borrows and the relevance of his corpus to topics dear to the heart of STS. This is in part due to Latour's frequent criticisms of Bourdieu by name, Latour’s philosophical disagreements with Kant and neoKantians, and Latour’s prestige in STS, and partially due to Bourdieu’s somewhat indirect or orthogonal ways of addressing natural and physical sciences and technology. Due to the fact that the writings of both needed to be translated from the original French to be received by Anglo audiences, important cultural, stylistic, and rhetorical nuances were lost, mistranslated, or not translated across the linguistic and geographical divides. Including these distinctions is invaluable to understanding their relationship and further weakens the justification for Bourdieu's absence from STS.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    FORUM: QUALITATIVE Volume 3, No. 3, Art. 15 SOCIAL RESEARCH September 2002 SOZIALFORSCHUNG Signing for Reflexivity: Constructionist Rhetorics and Its Reflexive Critique in Science and Technology Studies Tarja Knuuttila Key words: Abstract: I argue that reflexivity should not be seen as being primarily about the relationship of reflexivity, Science scientific writing to the realities studied—as it is often understood. In trying to establish this point I and Technology examine the discussion about reflexivity in science and technology studies (STS). The STS reflexiv- Studies, ists claimed that the relativist and constructionist STS undermined reflexively themselves by argu- representation, ing that all knowledge is situated and socially constructed. In the face of this reflexive problematics constructionism, they suggested that "new literary forms", which manifest the constructed nature of scientific text, relativism should be adopted. It seems to me that this program of inscribing reflexivity was semiotically misguided, which contributed to its demise. On the other hand, I argue that the basic reflexive point about the paradoxicality of making general claims about the local and contingent "nature" of knowl- edge is sound and that it should have deserved more attention in the constructionist rhetoric. The second part of my paper draws some more general methodological points from the STS case presented. I am especially interested in the performative aspects of signing for methodological novelties and ask whether it is sensible to talk about "reflexive methodology". Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Turn, Turn, Turn—Reflexivity in STS 2.1 Science "as it actually happens"? 2.2 The possibility of a writerly mode of STS writing 2.3 Reflexivity re-examined 3.
  • Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead Axel KRUSI;

    Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead Axel KRUSI;

    SYDNEY STUDIES Tragicomedy and Tragic Burlesque: Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead AxEL KRUSI; When Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead appeared at the .Old Vic theatre' in 1967, there was some suspicion that lack of literary value was one reason for the play's success. These doubts are repeated in the revised 1969 edition of John Russell Taylor's standard survey of recent British drama. The view in The Angry Theatre is that Stoppard lacks individuality, and that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is a pale imitation of the theatre of the absurd, wrillen in "brisk, informal prose", and with a vision of character and life which seems "a very small mouse to emerge from such an imposing mountain".l In contrast, Jumpers was received with considerable critical approval. Jumpers and Osborne's A Sense of Detachment and Storey's Life Class might seem to be evidence that in the past few years the new British drama has reached maturity as a tradition of dramatic forms aitd dramatic conventions which exist as a pattern of meaningful relationships between plays and audiences in particular theatres.2 Jumpers includes a group of philosophical acrobats, and in style and meaning seems to be an improved version of Stoppard's trans· lation of Beckett's theatre of the absurd into the terms of the conversation about the death of tragedy between the Player and Rosencrantz: Player Why, we grow rusty and you catch us at the very point of decadence-by this time tomorrow we might have forgotten every­ thing we ever knew.
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology

    Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
  • Literary Forms-The Epic

    Literary Forms-The Epic

    Literary Forms-The Epic Dr.M.K.Praseeda Assistant Professor Department of English(Aided) The Epic • The Epic Defined:- • 1. Long narrative poem heroic personages of history or tradition. • 2. Tale in verse • Epic of Growth and Epic of Art:- • Epic is divided into two classes (1) The Epic of Growth or Authentic Epic or folk Epic. (2) The literary Epic or Epic of Art. • Authentic Epic is not the work of one man. • It is the collection of a series of folk songs and legends. • The literary Epic is the work of one individual genius • The old English epic “Beowulf”, Homer’s ‘Iliad’ is odyssey are Authentic Epics. • Vergil’s “Aeneid” and Milton’s paradise Lost” Literary Epic. Qualities of an epic:- • High seriousness. • Comprehensiveness. • Characterized by greatness of scope and majesty. • There is room four very great variety. • The action of epic is spacious. • Inclusiveness is another characteristic of an epic. • The characters are gods to ordinary mortals. • Its scenic background changes frequently. • Its takes long time. • The events therein range from the earth. • Choric aspect is a characteristic of an epic, which is mentioned by profession Tillyard. • Epic must express the spirit of an age or nation and not merely the feelings and experiences of individuals. • Homes expresses the admiration of the people of his time for the heroic qualities. • An epic poet has the consciousness of being a prophet of his time. The Convention in the Epic:- • (a) The theme of the Epic, is stated in the first few lines • The prayer and the ‘innovation’. • (b) Introduction of smilies in the Homeric manner.
  • Virginian Writers Fugitive Verse

    Virginian Writers Fugitive Verse

    VIRGIN IAN WRITERS OF FUGITIVE VERSE VIRGINIAN WRITERS FUGITIVE VERSE we with ARMISTEAD C. GORDON, JR., M. A., PH. D, Assistant Proiesso-r of English Literature. University of Virginia I“ .‘ '. , - IV ' . \ ,- w \ . e. < ~\ ,' ’/I , . xx \ ‘1 ‘ 5:" /« .t {my | ; NC“ ‘.- ‘ '\ ’ 1 I Nor, \‘ /" . -. \\ ' ~. I -. Gil-T 'J 1’: II. D' VI. Doctor: .. _ ‘i 8 » $9793 Copyrighted 1923 by JAMES '1‘. WHITE & C0. :To MY FATHER ARMISTEAD CHURCHILL GORDON, A VIRGINIAN WRITER OF FUGITIVE VERSE. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. The thanks of the author are due to the following publishers, editors, and individuals for their kind permission to reprint the following selections for which they hold copyright: To Dodd, Mead and Company for “Hold Me Not False” by Katherine Pearson Woods. To The Neale Publishing Company for “1861-1865” by W. Cabell Bruce. To The Times-Dispatch Publishing Company for “The Land of Heart‘s Desire” by Thomas Lomax Hunter. To The Curtis Publishing Company for “The Lane” by Thomas Lomax Hunter (published in The Saturday Eve- ning Post, and copyrighted, 1923, by the Curtis Publishing 00.). To the Johnson Publishing Company for “Desolate” by Fanny Murdaugh Downing (cited from F. V. N. Painter’s Poets of Virginia). To Harper & Brothers for “A Mood” and “A Reed Call” by Charles Washington Coleman. To The Independent for “Life’s Silent Third”: by Charles Washington Coleman. To the Boston Evening Transcript for “Sister Mary Veronica” by Nancy Byrd Turner. To The Century for “Leaves from the Anthology” by Lewis Parke Chamberlayne and “Over the Sea Lies Spain” by Charles Washington Coleman. To Henry Holt and Company for “Mary‘s Dream” by John Lowe and “To Pocahontas” by John Rolfe.