DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetic Determinants of Inter-Individual Variations in DNA Methylation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genetic Determinants of Inter-Individual Variations in DNA Methylation Genetic determinants of inter-individual variations in DNA methylation Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Fakultät für Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Julia Wimmer (geb. Wegner) aus Neubrandenburg im Jahr 2014 The present work was carried out at the Clinic and Polyclininc of Internal Medicine III at the University Hospital Regensburg from March 2010 to August 2014. Die vorliegende Arbeit entstand im Zeitraum von März 2010 bis August 2014 an der Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg. Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 01. September 2014 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Michael Rehli Prüfungsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Herbert Tschochner Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Rehli Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Axel Imhof Drittprüfer: Prof. Dr. Gernot Längst Ersatzprüfer: PD Dr. Joachim Griesenbeck Unterschrift: ____________________________ Who seeks shall find. (Sophocles) Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ IV LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... V 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE CONCEPT OF EPIGENETICS ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 DNA methylation ................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1.1 Setting and erasing methylation at CpG dinucleotides ......................................................... 2 1.1.1.2 Methyl-CpG binding proteins, the readers of DNA methylation ........................................... 6 1.1.2 The histone code ................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2.1 Histone acetylation ................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.2.2 Histone methylation .................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.2.3 Translation of the histone code .............................................................................................. 11 1.1.3 Non-coding RNAs ............................................................................................................... 12 1.2 EPIGENETIC REPROGRAMMING DURING EMBRYOGENESIS ............................................................. 13 1.3 REGULATORS OF INTER-INDIVIDUAL EPIPHENOTYPES .................................................................... 16 2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 17 3 MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................... 18 3.1 EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2 CONSUMABLES ................................................................................................................................ 20 3.3 CHEMICALS ..................................................................................................................................... 21 3.4 ENZYMES, KITS, AND PRODUCTS FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ........................................................ 21 3.5 ANTIBIOTICS .................................................................................................................................... 22 3.6 MOLECULAR WEIGHT STANDARDS .................................................................................................. 23 3.7 CELL LINES ...................................................................................................................................... 23 3.8 E. COLI STRAINS .............................................................................................................................. 23 3.9 DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACIDS ............................................................................................................. 23 3.9.1 Murine genomic DNA ......................................................................................................... 23 3.9.2 Circular DNA ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.9.2.1 Plasmids .................................................................................................................................... 24 3.9.2.2 Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes ........................................................................................... 24 3.10 OLIGONUCLEOTIDES ................................................................................................................... 25 3.10.1 PCR primers .................................................................................................................... 25 3.10.2 RT-qPCR primers ........................................................................................................... 25 3.10.3 qPCR primers ................................................................................................................. 26 3.10.4 Primers for the MassARRAY system (Sequenom) ................................................. 27 3.10.4.1 EpiTYPER primers ................................................................................................................... 27 3.10.4.2 iPLEX primers ........................................................................................................................... 33 3.10.5 Primers for hybridization probes .................................................................................. 34 3.11 ANTIBODIES FOR IMMUNOPRECIPITATION EXPERIMENTS .......................................................... 40 3.12 DATABASES AND SOFTWARE ...................................................................................................... 40 4 METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 42 4.1 GENERAL CELL AND BACTERIA CULTURE METHODS ....................................................................... 42 4.1.1 Cell line cultures .................................................................................................................. 42 4.1.1.1 Murine embryonic stem cells .................................................................................................. 42 4.1.1.2 Assessing cell number and vitality ......................................................................................... 46 4.1.2 Bacterial culture ................................................................................................................... 47 I 4.1.2.1 Bacterial growth medium ......................................................................................................... 47 4.1.2.2 Transformation of E. coli ......................................................................................................... 48 4.1.2.3 Glycerol stock ........................................................................................................................... 50 4.2 LABORATORY ANIMALS .................................................................................................................... 50 4.3 GENERAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL METHODS ............................................................................... 51 4.3.1 Preparation and analysis of DNA ..................................................................................... 51 4.3.1.1 Isolation of circular DNA from E. Coli .................................................................................... 51 4.3.1.2 Isolation of genomic DNA from mammalian cells ................................................................ 54 4.3.1.3 Fragmentation of genomic DNA and chromatin ................................................................... 55 4.3.1.4 Agarose gel electrophoresis ................................................................................................... 58 4.3.1.5 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) ............................................................................... 60 4.3.1.6 Purification of DNA fragments by gel extraction .................................................................. 63 4.3.1.7 Purification of DNA by phenol/chloroform extraction ........................................................... 63 4.3.1.8 Polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG8000) precipitation of DNA................................................ 64 4.3.1.9 Alcohol precipitation of DNA ................................................................................................... 65 4.3.1.10 Polymerase chain reaction ...................................................................................................... 67 4.3.1.11 In vitro methylation and demethylation of genomic DNA ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of California, San Diego
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The post-terminal differentiation fate of RNAs revealed by next-generation sequencing A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences by Gloria Kuo Lefkowitz Committee in Charge: Professor Benjamin D. Yu, Chair Professor Richard Gallo Professor Bruce A. Hamilton Professor Miles F. Wilkinson Professor Eugene Yeo 2012 Copyright Gloria Kuo Lefkowitz, 2012 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Gloria Kuo Lefkowitz is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2012 iii DEDICATION Ma and Ba, for your early indulgence and support. Matt and James, for choosing more practical callings. Roy, my love, for patiently sharing the ups and downs of this journey. iv EPIGRAPH It is foolish to tear one's hair in grief, as though sorrow would be made less by baldness. ~Cicero v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page .............................................................................................................. iii Dedication ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Key Genes and Pathways in Inhibition of Oxycodone on Vincristine-Induced Microglia Activation by Using Bioinformatics Analysis
    Hindawi Disease Markers Volume 2019, Article ID 3521746, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3521746 Research Article Investigation of Key Genes and Pathways in Inhibition of Oxycodone on Vincristine-Induced Microglia Activation by Using Bioinformatics Analysis Wei Liu,1 Jishi Ye,2 and Hong Yan 1 1Department of Anesthesiology, the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, China 2Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060 Hubei, China Correspondence should be addressed to Hong Yan; [email protected] Received 2 November 2018; Accepted 31 December 2018; Published 10 February 2019 Academic Editor: Hubertus Himmerich Copyright © 2019 Wei Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Introduction. The neurobiological mechanisms underlying the chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain are only partially understood. Among them, microglia activation was identified as the key component of neuropathic pain. The aim of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathways associated with vincristine-induced neuropathic pain by using bioinformatics analysis and observe the effects of oxycodone on these DEG expressions in a vincristine-induced microglia activation model. Methods. Based on microarray profile GSE53897, we identified DEGs between vincristine-induced neuropathic pain rats and the control group. Using the ToppGene database, the prioritization DEGs were screened and performed by gene ontology (GO) and signaling pathway enrichment. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was used to explore the relationship among DEGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Interplay Between Epigenetics and Metabolism in Oncogenesis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches
    OPEN Oncogene (2017) 36, 3359–3374 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Interplay between epigenetics and metabolism in oncogenesis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches CC Wong1, Y Qian2,3 and J Yu1 Epigenetic and metabolic alterations in cancer cells are highly intertwined. Oncogene-driven metabolic rewiring modifies the epigenetic landscape via modulating the activities of DNA and histone modification enzymes at the metabolite level. Conversely, epigenetic mechanisms regulate the expression of metabolic genes, thereby altering the metabolome. Epigenetic-metabolomic interplay has a critical role in tumourigenesis by coordinately sustaining cell proliferation, metastasis and pluripotency. Understanding the link between epigenetics and metabolism could unravel novel molecular targets, whose intervention may lead to improvements in cancer treatment. In this review, we summarized the recent discoveries linking epigenetics and metabolism and their underlying roles in tumorigenesis; and highlighted the promising molecular targets, with an update on the development of small molecule or biologic inhibitors against these abnormalities in cancer. Oncogene (2017) 36, 3359–3374; doi:10.1038/onc.2016.485; published online 16 January 2017 INTRODUCTION metabolic genes have also been identified as driver genes It has been appreciated since the early days of cancer research mutated in some cancers, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 16 17 that the metabolic profiles of tumor cells differ significantly from and 2 (IDH1/2) in gliomas and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 18 normal cells. Cancer cells have high metabolic demands and they succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) in paragangliomas and fuma- utilize nutrients with an altered metabolic program to support rate hydratase (FH) in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell 19 their high proliferative rates and adapt to the hostile tumor cancer (HLRCC).
    [Show full text]
  • Mutant IDH, (R)-2-Hydroxyglutarate, and Cancer
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW What a difference a hydroxyl makes: mutant IDH, (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, and cancer Julie-Aurore Losman1 and William G. Kaelin Jr.1,2,3 1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA Mutations in metabolic enzymes, including isocitrate whether altered cellular metabolism is a cause of cancer dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2, in cancer strongly or merely an adaptive response of cancer cells in the face implicate altered metabolism in tumorigenesis. IDH1 of accelerated cell proliferation is still a topic of some and IDH2 catalyze the interconversion of isocitrate and debate. 2-oxoglutarate (2OG). 2OG is a TCA cycle intermediate The recent identification of cancer-associated muta- and an essential cofactor for many enzymes, including tions in three metabolic enzymes suggests that altered JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases, TET cellular metabolism can indeed be a cause of some 5-methylcytosine hydroxylases, and EglN prolyl-4-hydrox- cancers (Pollard et al. 2003; King et al. 2006; Raimundo ylases. Cancer-associated IDH mutations alter the enzymes et al. 2011). Two of these enzymes, fumarate hydratase such that they reduce 2OG to the structurally similar (FH) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), are bone fide metabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate [(R)-2HG]. Here we tumor suppressors, and loss-of-function mutations in FH review what is known about the molecular mechanisms and SDH have been identified in various cancers, in- of transformation by mutant IDH and discuss their im- cluding renal cell carcinomas and paragangliomas.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from [266]
    Patterns of DNA methylation on the human X chromosome and use in analyzing X-chromosome inactivation by Allison Marie Cotton B.Sc., The University of Guelph, 2005 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Medical Genetics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) January 2012 © Allison Marie Cotton, 2012 Abstract The process of X-chromosome inactivation achieves dosage compensation between mammalian males and females. In females one X chromosome is transcriptionally silenced through a variety of epigenetic modifications including DNA methylation. Most X-linked genes are subject to X-chromosome inactivation and only expressed from the active X chromosome. On the inactive X chromosome, the CpG island promoters of genes subject to X-chromosome inactivation are methylated in their promoter regions, while genes which escape from X- chromosome inactivation have unmethylated CpG island promoters on both the active and inactive X chromosomes. The first objective of this thesis was to determine if the DNA methylation of CpG island promoters could be used to accurately predict X chromosome inactivation status. The second objective was to use DNA methylation to predict X-chromosome inactivation status in a variety of tissues. A comparison of blood, muscle, kidney and neural tissues revealed tissue-specific X-chromosome inactivation, in which 12% of genes escaped from X-chromosome inactivation in some, but not all, tissues. X-linked DNA methylation analysis of placental tissues predicted four times higher escape from X-chromosome inactivation than in any other tissue. Despite the hypomethylation of repetitive elements on both the X chromosome and the autosomes, no changes were detected in the frequency or intensity of placental Cot-1 holes.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Annotations of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism
    CLINICAL RESEARCH e-ISSN 1643-3750 © Med Sci Monit, 2020; 26: e922710 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.922710 Received: 2020.01.08 Accepted: 2020.02.20 Functional Annotations of Single-Nucleotide Available online: 2020.03.30 Published: 2020.05.25 Polymorphism (SNP)-Based and Gene-Based Genome-Wide Association Studies Show Genes Affecting Keratitis Susceptibility Authors’ Contribution: BCDEF 1 Yue Xu* 1 Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Study Design A BCDEF 2 Xiao-Lin Yang* Suzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China Data Collection B 2 Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Genomics, School of Public Health, Medical Statistical Analysis C BCD 1 Xiao-Long Yang College of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China Data Interpretation D BC 1 Ya-Ru Ren Manuscript Preparation E BC 1 Xin-Yu Zhuang Literature Search F Funds Collection G ADE 2 Lei Zhang ADE 1 Xiao-Feng Zhang * Yue Xu and Xiao-Lin Yang contributed equally Corresponding Authors: Xiao-Feng Zhang, e-mail: [email protected], Lei Zhang, e-mail: [email protected] Source of support: Departmental sources Background: Keratitis is a complex condition in humans and is the second most common cause of legal blindness worldwide. Material/Methods: To reveal the genomic loci underlying keratitis, we performed functional annotations of SNP-based and gene- based genome-wide association studies of keratitis in the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort with 337 199 subjects of European ancestry. Results: The publicly available SNP-based association results showed a total of 34 SNPs, from 14 distinct loci, associated with keratitis in the UKB. Gene-based association analysis identified 2 significant genes:IQCF3 (p=2.0×10–6) and SOD3 (p=2.0×10–6).
    [Show full text]
  • 1714 Gene Comprehensive Cancer Panel Enriched for Clinically Actionable Genes with Additional Biologically Relevant Genes 400-500X Average Coverage on Tumor
    xO GENE PANEL 1714 gene comprehensive cancer panel enriched for clinically actionable genes with additional biologically relevant genes 400-500x average coverage on tumor Genes A-C Genes D-F Genes G-I Genes J-L AATK ATAD2B BTG1 CDH7 CREM DACH1 EPHA1 FES G6PC3 HGF IL18RAP JADE1 LMO1 ABCA1 ATF1 BTG2 CDK1 CRHR1 DACH2 EPHA2 FEV G6PD HIF1A IL1R1 JAK1 LMO2 ABCB1 ATM BTG3 CDK10 CRK DAXX EPHA3 FGF1 GAB1 HIF1AN IL1R2 JAK2 LMO7 ABCB11 ATR BTK CDK11A CRKL DBH EPHA4 FGF10 GAB2 HIST1H1E IL1RAP JAK3 LMTK2 ABCB4 ATRX BTRC CDK11B CRLF2 DCC EPHA5 FGF11 GABPA HIST1H3B IL20RA JARID2 LMTK3 ABCC1 AURKA BUB1 CDK12 CRTC1 DCUN1D1 EPHA6 FGF12 GALNT12 HIST1H4E IL20RB JAZF1 LPHN2 ABCC2 AURKB BUB1B CDK13 CRTC2 DCUN1D2 EPHA7 FGF13 GATA1 HLA-A IL21R JMJD1C LPHN3 ABCG1 AURKC BUB3 CDK14 CRTC3 DDB2 EPHA8 FGF14 GATA2 HLA-B IL22RA1 JMJD4 LPP ABCG2 AXIN1 C11orf30 CDK15 CSF1 DDIT3 EPHB1 FGF16 GATA3 HLF IL22RA2 JMJD6 LRP1B ABI1 AXIN2 CACNA1C CDK16 CSF1R DDR1 EPHB2 FGF17 GATA5 HLTF IL23R JMJD7 LRP5 ABL1 AXL CACNA1S CDK17 CSF2RA DDR2 EPHB3 FGF18 GATA6 HMGA1 IL2RA JMJD8 LRP6 ABL2 B2M CACNB2 CDK18 CSF2RB DDX3X EPHB4 FGF19 GDNF HMGA2 IL2RB JUN LRRK2 ACE BABAM1 CADM2 CDK19 CSF3R DDX5 EPHB6 FGF2 GFI1 HMGCR IL2RG JUNB LSM1 ACSL6 BACH1 CALR CDK2 CSK DDX6 EPOR FGF20 GFI1B HNF1A IL3 JUND LTK ACTA2 BACH2 CAMTA1 CDK20 CSNK1D DEK ERBB2 FGF21 GFRA4 HNF1B IL3RA JUP LYL1 ACTC1 BAG4 CAPRIN2 CDK3 CSNK1E DHFR ERBB3 FGF22 GGCX HNRNPA3 IL4R KAT2A LYN ACVR1 BAI3 CARD10 CDK4 CTCF DHH ERBB4 FGF23 GHR HOXA10 IL5RA KAT2B LZTR1 ACVR1B BAP1 CARD11 CDK5 CTCFL DIAPH1 ERCC1 FGF3 GID4 HOXA11 IL6R KAT5 ACVR2A
    [Show full text]
  • A Yeast Phenomic Model for the Influence of Warburg Metabolism on Genetic Buffering of Doxorubicin Sean M
    Santos and Hartman Cancer & Metabolism (2019) 7:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-019-0201-3 RESEARCH Open Access A yeast phenomic model for the influence of Warburg metabolism on genetic buffering of doxorubicin Sean M. Santos and John L. Hartman IV* Abstract Background: The influence of the Warburg phenomenon on chemotherapy response is unknown. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mimics the Warburg effect, repressing respiration in the presence of adequate glucose. Yeast phenomic experiments were conducted to assess potential influences of Warburg metabolism on gene-drug interaction underlying the cellular response to doxorubicin. Homologous genes from yeast phenomic and cancer pharmacogenomics data were analyzed to infer evolutionary conservation of gene-drug interaction and predict therapeutic relevance. Methods: Cell proliferation phenotypes (CPPs) of the yeast gene knockout/knockdown library were measured by quantitative high-throughput cell array phenotyping (Q-HTCP), treating with escalating doxorubicin concentrations under conditions of respiratory or glycolytic metabolism. Doxorubicin-gene interaction was quantified by departure of CPPs observed for the doxorubicin-treated mutant strain from that expected based on an interaction model. Recursive expectation-maximization clustering (REMc) and Gene Ontology (GO)-based analyses of interactions identified functional biological modules that differentially buffer or promote doxorubicin cytotoxicity with respect to Warburg metabolism. Yeast phenomic and cancer pharmacogenomics data were integrated to predict differential gene expression causally influencing doxorubicin anti-tumor efficacy. Results: Yeast compromised for genes functioning in chromatin organization, and several other cellular processes are more resistant to doxorubicin under glycolytic conditions. Thus, the Warburg transition appears to alleviate requirements for cellular functions that buffer doxorubicin cytotoxicity in a respiratory context.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Metallomics
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Metallomics. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 Uniprot Entry name Gene names Protein names Predicted Pattern Number of Iron role EC number Subcellular Membrane Involvement in disease Gene ontology (biological process) Id iron ions location associated 1 P46952 3HAO_HUMAN HAAO 3-hydroxyanthranilate 3,4- H47-E53-H91 1 Fe cation Catalytic 1.13.11.6 Cytoplasm No NAD biosynthetic process [GO:0009435]; neuron cellular homeostasis dioxygenase (EC 1.13.11.6) (3- [GO:0070050]; quinolinate biosynthetic process [GO:0019805]; response to hydroxyanthranilate oxygenase) cadmium ion [GO:0046686]; response to zinc ion [GO:0010043]; tryptophan (3-HAO) (3-hydroxyanthranilic catabolic process [GO:0006569] acid dioxygenase) (HAD) 2 O00767 ACOD_HUMAN SCD Acyl-CoA desaturase (EC H120-H125-H157-H161; 2 Fe cations Catalytic 1.14.19.1 Endoplasmic Yes long-chain fatty-acyl-CoA biosynthetic process [GO:0035338]; unsaturated fatty 1.14.19.1) (Delta(9)-desaturase) H160-H269-H298-H302 reticulum acid biosynthetic process [GO:0006636] (Delta-9 desaturase) (Fatty acid desaturase) (Stearoyl-CoA desaturase) (hSCD1) 3 Q6ZNF0 ACP7_HUMAN ACP7 PAPL PAPL1 Acid phosphatase type 7 (EC D141-D170-Y173-H335 1 Fe cation Catalytic 3.1.3.2 Extracellular No 3.1.3.2) (Purple acid space phosphatase long form) 4 Q96SZ5 AEDO_HUMAN ADO C10orf22 2-aminoethanethiol dioxygenase H112-H114-H193 1 Fe cation Catalytic 1.13.11.19 Unknown No oxidation-reduction process [GO:0055114]; sulfur amino acid catabolic process (EC 1.13.11.19) (Cysteamine
    [Show full text]
  • Xo GENE PANEL
    xO GENE PANEL Targeted panel of 1714 genes | Tumor DNA Coverage: 500x | RNA reads: 50 million Onco-seq panel includes clinically relevant genes and a wide array of biologically relevant genes Genes A-C Genes D-F Genes G-I Genes J-L AATK ATAD2B BTG1 CDH7 CREM DACH1 EPHA1 FES G6PC3 HGF IL18RAP JADE1 LMO1 ABCA1 ATF1 BTG2 CDK1 CRHR1 DACH2 EPHA2 FEV G6PD HIF1A IL1R1 JAK1 LMO2 ABCB1 ATM BTG3 CDK10 CRK DAXX EPHA3 FGF1 GAB1 HIF1AN IL1R2 JAK2 LMO7 ABCB11 ATR BTK CDK11A CRKL DBH EPHA4 FGF10 GAB2 HIST1H1E IL1RAP JAK3 LMTK2 ABCB4 ATRX BTRC CDK11B CRLF2 DCC EPHA5 FGF11 GABPA HIST1H3B IL20RA JARID2 LMTK3 ABCC1 AURKA BUB1 CDK12 CRTC1 DCUN1D1 EPHA6 FGF12 GALNT12 HIST1H4E IL20RB JAZF1 LPHN2 ABCC2 AURKB BUB1B CDK13 CRTC2 DCUN1D2 EPHA7 FGF13 GATA1 HLA-A IL21R JMJD1C LPHN3 ABCG1 AURKC BUB3 CDK14 CRTC3 DDB2 EPHA8 FGF14 GATA2 HLA-B IL22RA1 JMJD4 LPP ABCG2 AXIN1 C11orf30 CDK15 CSF1 DDIT3 EPHB1 FGF16 GATA3 HLF IL22RA2 JMJD6 LRP1B ABI1 AXIN2 CACNA1C CDK16 CSF1R DDR1 EPHB2 FGF17 GATA5 HLTF IL23R JMJD7 LRP5 ABL1 AXL CACNA1S CDK17 CSF2RA DDR2 EPHB3 FGF18 GATA6 HMGA1 IL2RA JMJD8 LRP6 ABL2 B2M CACNB2 CDK18 CSF2RB DDX3X EPHB4 FGF19 GDNF HMGA2 IL2RB JUN LRRK2 ACE BABAM1 CADM2 CDK19 CSF3R DDX5 EPHB6 FGF2 GFI1 HMGCR IL2RG JUNB LSM1 ACSL6 BACH1 CALR CDK2 CSK DDX6 EPOR FGF20 GFI1B HNF1A IL3 JUND LTK ACTA2 BACH2 CAMTA1 CDK20 CSNK1D DEK ERBB2 FGF21 GFRA4 HNF1B IL3RA JUP LYL1 ACTC1 BAG4 CAPRIN2 CDK3 CSNK1E DHFR ERBB3 FGF22 GGCX HNRNPA3 IL4R KAT2A LYN ACVR1 BAI3 CARD10 CDK4 CTCF DHH ERBB4 FGF23 GHR HOXA10 IL5RA KAT2B LZTR1 ACVR1B BAP1 CARD11 CDK5 CTCFL DIAPH1 ERCC1 FGF3 GID4
    [Show full text]
  • A Master Autoantigen-Ome Links Alternative Splicing, Female Predilection, and COVID-19 to Autoimmune Diseases
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.30.454526; this version posted August 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A Master Autoantigen-ome Links Alternative Splicing, Female Predilection, and COVID-19 to Autoimmune Diseases Julia Y. Wang1*, Michael W. Roehrl1, Victor B. Roehrl1, and Michael H. Roehrl2* 1 Curandis, New York, USA 2 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.30.454526; this version posted August 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Chronic and debilitating autoimmune sequelae pose a grave concern for the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. Based on our discovery that the glycosaminoglycan dermatan sulfate (DS) displays peculiar affinity to apoptotic cells and autoantigens (autoAgs) and that DS-autoAg complexes cooperatively stimulate autoreactive B1 cell responses, we compiled a database of 751 candidate autoAgs from six human cell types. At least 657 of these have been found to be affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection based on currently available multi-omic COVID data, and at least 400 are confirmed targets of autoantibodies in a wide array of autoimmune diseases and cancer.
    [Show full text]