DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Discussion Guide for Nowhere to Hide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Discussion Guide for Nowhere to Hide POV Community Engagement & Education DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide A Film by Zaradasht Ahmed www.pbs.org/pov LETTER FROM THE FILMMAKER Director Zaradasht Ahmed. My ambition is to let the audience reflect on the human consequences of a brutal Photo courtesy of Fouad Baqi reality where all taboos are violated. With Nowhere to Hide, I want to show that we are all part of this reality made up of war, explosions, victims, terrorism. They affect us globally, and we are all responsible, no matter our geographical whereabouts. Meanwhile, I want to show the human resistance that is growing among survivors and to show the hope of rebuilding after the breakdown of civilization. In the end, as humans, the only thing that can help us survive is to believe that the will to build will always be stronger than the desire to destroy. Zaradasht Ahmed Director, Nowhere to Hide DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide |2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CREDITS 2 Letter from the Filmmaker Writer 4 Introduction Faith Rogow, PhD 5 Potential Partners Insighters Educational Consulting 5 Key Issues Background Research and Reporting 5 Using This Guide Ione Barrows 6 Background Information Associate, Community Engagement and Education, POV 6 Iraq War Guide Producers, POV 7 Iraq War Casualties Alice Quinlan 8 Diyala Province Manager, Community Engagement and Education, POV 10 General Discussion Questions Rachel Friedland 11 Discussion Prompts Community Partnerships Assistant, 14 Taking Action Community Engagement and Education, POV 15 Resources Design: 16 Iraq War Timeline Rafael Jiménez 22 How to Buy the Film Copy Editor: Natalie Danford Thanks to those who reviewed this guide: Zaradasht Ahmed Director, Nowhere to Hide Mette Cheng Munthe-Kaas Producer, Nowhere to Hide The team at the Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide |3 INTRODUCTION Nowhere to Hide (60 min.) follows nurse Nori Sharif in one of Nori filming in central Iraq. the world's most dangerous and inaccessible areas: Diyala Photo courtesy of Zaradasht Ahmed province in Iraq. Filmmaker Zaradasht Ahmed has given Nori a camera to film the survivors of the war, who hope for a better future after the 2011 withdrawal of U.S. troops. But soon a new kind of war erupts: one with invisible enemies, unpredictable battlefronts and no clear rules. Over five years, Sharif turns the camera on his own family as they join the more than 3.5 million Iraqis displaced from their homes and flee to the Sa’ad refugee camp. Hope of returning to life be- fore the American invasion becomes increasingly difficult to sustain. Viewers are left to wonder what will happen next. While news coverage has focused on placing blame for the chaos, Nowhere to Hide turns our attention to everyday Iraqis and lets them tell their stories. DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide |4 POTENTIAL PARTNERS KEY ISSUES Nowhere to Hide is well suited for use in a variety of set- Nowhere to Hide is an excellent tool for outreach and tings and is especially recommended for use with: will be of special interest to people looking to explore the following topics: • Your local PBS station • Groups that have discussed previous PBS and POV • civilian casualties films relating to Iraq, Middle East conflicts, • foreign policy civilians caught in war and citizen journalists, • human rights including My Country, My Country, War Feels Like • international humanitarian law War, Last Men in Aleppo, Return to Homs, The War Show and 5 Broken Cameras • Iraq • Groups focused on any of the issues listed in the • Iraq War “Key Issues” section • medical aid • Academic departments and student groups at • Middle East colleges, universities and high schools • nation-building • Faith-based organizations and institutions • nursing • Cultural, art and historical organizations, • peace studies institutions and museums • politics/political science • Civic, fraternal, veterans and community groups • refugees • High school students, youth groups and clubs • internally displaced people (IDPs) • Community organizations with a mission to • Sunni-Shia conflicts promote education and learning, such as local libraries • tribal identity • U.S. military • U.S. “war on terror” USING THIS GUIDE This guide is an invitation to dialogue. It is based on a belief in the power of human connection, designed for people who want to use Nowhere to Hide to engage family, friends, classmates, colleagues and communities. In contrast to initiatives that foster debates in which participants try to convince others that they are right, this document envisions conversa- tions undertaken in a spirit of openness in which people try to understand one another and expand their thinking by shar- ing viewpoints and listening actively. The discussion prompts are intentionally crafted to help a wide range of audiences think more deeply about the issues in the film. Rather than attempting to address them all, choose one or two that best meet your needs and interests. And be sure to leave time to consider taking action. Planning next steps can help people leave the room feeling energized and optimistic, even in instances when conversations have been difficult. For more detailed event planning and facilitation tips, visit www.pov.org/engage DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide |5 BACKGROUND INFORMATION After filming other Iraqis fleeing violence, Iraq War Nori turns the camera on himself. Photo courtesy of Zaradasht Ahmed The Iraq War began in March 2003, when the United States and a coalition of allies invaded Iraq and overthrew the au- thoritarian regime of Saddam Hussein. American troops oc- cupied Iraq for eight years, attempting to install democracy don’t have the means to escape. As of 2018, almost two mil- and stabilize an increasingly fractured and volatile country. lion Iraqis remain internally displaced people (IDPs). The occupation’s failure to establish an effective govern- For an overview of the major events in the war, see the Iraq ment after Hussein’s ouster led to an extended civil war, as War Timeline at the end of this guide (page 16). various political groups and religious sects struggled for power. These groups include the majority Shiite Arabs, the Sources Sunni Arab insurgency, the Kurds and, in later years, various Arango, Tim. “Iran Dominates in Iraq After U.S. ‘Handed the Country extremist factions such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS. Over.’” The New York Times. July 15, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/world/middleeast/iran-iraq- The Iraq War is one of most complex and deadly wars in re- iranian-power.html cent history. Hundreds of thousands of civilians have been killed and as of 2018 the death toll continues to rise. Seven International Organization for Migration. “Iraq Mission Displacement years after U.S. troops officially withdrew, Iraq is the staging Tracking Matrix.” http://iraqdtm.iom.int/IDPsML.aspx ground for ongoing violent conflicts; jihadist militias from elsewhere in the Middle East have crossed the border to join the fray. Although some Iraqis were able to flee the country as refugees, many are living in poverty and DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide |6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION A father mourns his son killed in a bombing. Iraq War Casualties Photo courtesy of Zaradasht Ahmed The exact number of people killed in the Iraq War is un- known. The U.S. military has not published an official death toll, but a number of groups have estimated that nearly 5,000 American troops have died in Iraq since 2003. Mean- to carry out strikes against targets without risking the lives while, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed or of American soldiers. The U.S. military acknowledged in June wounded in military operations and clashes between rival 2017 that “at least 484 [Iraqi] civilians have been uninten- factions. Iraqi deaths attributable to the conflict from 2003 tionally killed by coalition strikes,” but this figure is far lower to 2011 are estimated to number 400,000—a figure that in- than the estimates of independent groups. One watchdog cludes about 240,000 violent deaths and fatalities caused organization estimates that the civilian death toll due to U.S. indirectly by the war (for example, due to a lack of clean activities is much higher and posits that a minimum of 6,259 drinking water or illnesses that could have been treated if civilians (including Syrians) have been killed by more than the healthcare infrastructure had not been destroyed). Since 14,200 strikes conducted by the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq. the official U.S. operation ended in 2011, it is estimated that an additional 82,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed. Ac- cording to one report, as many civilians have been wounded Sources as were killed in the war. Airwars. “Iraq and Syria.” https://airwars.org/ Although the U.S. is no longer sending troops to Iraq, Amer- Bump, Phillip. ”15 Years After the Iraq War Began, the Death Toll Is Still ican airstrikes have increased since the rise of terrorist Murky” The Washington Post, March 20, 2018. https://www.washing- group ISIS, also known as Daesh or the Islamic State, in tonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/03/20/15-years-after-it-began-the 2014. Drone-operated missiles allow the U.S. military -death-toll-from-the-iraq-war-is-still-murky/?utm_term=.86566cb5df73 DISCUSSION GUIDE Nowhere to Hide |7 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Nori's family fled to the Sa'ad camp for Crawford, Neta C. “Costs of War: Iraqi Civilians.” Brown University displaced persons (IDPs). Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs. Photo courtesy of Zaradasht Ahmed http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi iCasualties. “Operation Enduring Freedom.” http://icasualties.org/ U.S. Central Command. “Combined Joint Task Force—Operation Diyala Province Inherent Resolve Monthly Civilian Casualty Report.” Diyala province is a governorate in eastern Iraq that starts http://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release- northeast of Baghdad and extends to the Iranian border.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    1/9/2017 Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction home | about | documents | news | publications | FOIA | research | internships | search | donate | mailing list Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80 Updated ­ February 11, 2004 Edited by Jeffrey Richelson Originally posted December 20, 2002 Previously updated February 26, 2003 Documents ­ Press release ­ Further reading Between Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, and the commencement of military ac绳on in January 1991, then President George H.W. Bush raised the specter of the Iraqi pursuit of nuclear weapons as one jus绳fica绳on for taking decisive ac绳on against Iraq. In the then‐classified Na绳onal Security Direc绳ve 54, signed on January 15, 1991, authorizing the use of force to expel Iraq from Kuwait, he iden绳fied Iraqi use of weapons of mass destruc绳on (WMD) against allied forces as an ac绳on that would lead the U.S. to seek the removal of Saddam Hussein from power. (Note 1) In the aermath of Iraq's defeat, the U.S.‐led U.N. coali绳on was able to compel Iraq to agree to an inspec绳on and monitoring regime, intended to insure that Iraq dismantled its WMD programs and did not take ac绳ons to recons绳tute them. The means of implemen绳ng the relevant U.N. resolu绳ons was the Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM). That inspec绳on regime con绳nued un绳l December 16, 1998 ‐ although it involved interrup绳ons, confronta绳ons, and Iraqi aꬫempts at denial and decep绳on ‐ when UNSCOM withdrew from Iraq in the face of Iraqi refusal to cooperate, and harassment. Subsequent to George W. Bush's assump绳on of the presidency in January 2001, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Basra: Strategic Dilemmas and Force Options
    CASE STUDY NO. 8 COMPLEX OPERATIONS CASE STUDIES SERIES Basra: Strategic Dilemmas and Force Options John Hodgson The Pennsylvania State University KAREN GUTTIERI SERIES EDITOR Naval Postgraduate School COMPLEX OPERATIONS CASE STUDIES SERIES Complex operations encompass stability, security, transition and recon- struction, and counterinsurgency operations and operations consisting of irregular warfare (United States Public Law No 417, 2008). Stability opera- tions frameworks engage many disciplines to achieve their goals, including establishment of safe and secure environments, the rule of law, social well- being, stable governance, and sustainable economy. A comprehensive approach to complex operations involves many elements—governmental and nongovernmental, public and private—of the international community or a “whole of community” effort, as well as engagement by many different components of government agencies, or a “whole of government” approach. Taking note of these requirements, a number of studies called for incentives to grow the field of capable scholars and practitioners, and the development of resources for educators, students and practitioners. A 2008 United States Institute of Peace study titled “Sharing the Space” specifically noted the need for case studies and lessons. Gabriel Marcella and Stephen Fought argued for a case-based approach to teaching complex operations in the pages of Joint Forces Quarterly, noting “Case studies force students into the problem; they put a face on history and bring life to theory.” We developed
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: Executive Summary
    Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 6 July 2016 for The Report of the Iraq Inquiry Executive Summary Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 6 July 2016 HC 264 46561_00b Viking_Executive Summary Title Page.indd 1 23/06/2016 14:22 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474133319 Web ISBN 9781474133326 ID 23051602 46561 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fi bre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce 46561_00b Viking_Executive Summary Title Page.indd 2 23/06/2016 14:22 46561_00c Viking_Executive Summary.indd 1 23/06/2016 15:04 46561_00c Viking_Executive Summary.indd 2 23/06/2016 14:17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 Pre‑conflict strategy and planning .................................................................................... 5 The UK decision to support US military action ................................................................. 6 UK policy before 9/11 ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: U.S. Military Operations
    Order Code RL31701 Iraq: U.S. Military Operations Updated July 15, 2007 Steve Bowman Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Iraq: U.S. Military Operations Summary Iraq’s chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs, together with Iraqi long-range missile development and support for Al Qaeda terrorism, were the primary justifications put forward for military action. On March 17, 2003, President Bush issued an ultimatum demanding that Saddam Hussein and his sons depart from Iraq within 48 hours. On March 19, offensive operations began with air strikes against Iraqi leadership positions. By April 15, after 27 days of operations, coalition forces were in relative control of all major Iraqi cities and Iraqi political and military leadership had disintegrated. On May 1, 2003, President Bush declared an end to major combat operations. There was no use of chemical or biological (CB) weapons, and no CB or nuclear weapons stockpiles or production facilities have been found. The major challenges to coalition forces are now quelling a persistent Iraqi resistance movement and training/retaining sufficient Iraqi security forces to assume responsibility for the nations domestic security. Though initially denying that there was an organized resistance movement, DOD officials have now acknowledged there is regional/local organization, with apparently ample supplies of arms and funding. CENTCOM has characterized the Iraqi resistance as “a classical guerrilla-type campaign.” DOD initially believed the resistance to consist primarily of former regime supporters and foreign fighters; however, it has now acknowledged that growing resentment of coalition forces and an increase in sectarian conflicts, independent of connections with the earlier regime, are contributing to the insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Information and Judicial Evidentiary Standards
    811 INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND JUDICIAL EVIDENTIARY STANDARDS ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION................................... 811 II. FACT FINDERS .................................... 813 III. NUCLEAR CAPABILITY ........................... 820 IV. BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS........................... 836 V. CHEMICAL WEAPONS ............................ 845 VI. DELIVERY SYSTEMS .............................. 851 VII. M ENS REA ......................................... 854 VIII. INVOLVEMENT WITH TERRORISM ............... 855 IX. CONCLUSION ..................................... 875 I. INTRODUCTION Senator Kennedy called it "reprehensible" that the "administra- tion distorted, misrepresented and manipulated the intelligence" on Iraq.' Louis Fisher wrote: "There should be no question that the pre- war information was distorted, hyped, and fabricated. The October 2002 [National Intelligence Estimate ("NIE")] prepared by the intelli- gence community is plain evidence of that . ."2 University of Pitts- burgh President Jem Spectar contended that the "Bush administration exploited, furthered, manipulated or thrived on the public's confusion .... "3 Professor Yamamoto explained, "Many have documented this ad- ministration's penchant for deliberate misrepresentations on national security-in blunt terms, [and] for lying to the American people about threats at home and abroad."4 Harvard Emeritus Professor Stanley t MA Political Science (Michigan), MA Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. In- ternational Law (Georgetown). The author has taught courses in International Law at Cooley Law School and for the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, courses in American Government and Constitutional Law at Alma College, and courses in Business Law at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 1. J M Spectar, Beyond the Rubicon: PresidentialLeadership, InternationalLaw & The Use of Force in the Long Hard Slog, 22 CoN. J. Irr'iL L. 47, 90 (2006). 2. Louis Fisher, Lost ConstitutionalMoorings: Recovering the War Power, 81 IND.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq
    The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq By Anthony H. Cordesman, Peter Alsis, Adam Mausner, and Charles Loi Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Revised: December 20, 2011 Note: This draft is being circulated for comments and suggestions. Please provide them to [email protected] Chapter 6: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, and the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Since the 2003 war, both the US and Iran have competed to shape the structure of Post-Saddam Iraq’s politics, governance, economics, and security. The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq and the Kurds: the Brewing Battle Over Kirkuk
    IRAQ AND THE KURDS: THE BREWING BATTLE OVER KIRKUK Middle East Report N°56 – 18 July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. COMPETING CLAIMS AND POSITIONS................................................................ 2 A. THE KURDISH NARRATIVE....................................................................................................3 B. THE TURKOMAN NARRATIVE................................................................................................4 C. THE ARAB NARRATIVE .........................................................................................................5 D. THE CHRISTIAN NARRATIVE .................................................................................................6 III. IRAQ’S POLITICAL TRANSITION AND KIRKUK ............................................... 7 A. USES OF THE KURDS’ NEW POWER .......................................................................................7 B. THE PACE OF “NORMALISATION”........................................................................................11 IV. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS................................................................ 16 A. THE KURDS.........................................................................................................................16 B. THE TURKOMANS ...............................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Operation in Iraq, Our Diplomatic Efforts Were Concentrated in the UN Process
    OPERATIONS IN IRAQ First Reflections IRAQ PUBLISHED JULY 2003 Produced by Director General Corporate Communication Design by Directorate of Corporate Communications DCCS (Media) London IRAQ FIRST REFLECTIONS REPORT Contents Foreword 2 Chapter 1 - Policy Background to the Operation 3 Chapter 2 - Planning and Preparation 4 Chapter 3 - The Campaign 10 Chapter 4 - Equipment Capability & Logistics 22 Chapter 5 - People 28 Chapter 6 - Processes 32 Chapter 7 - After the Conflict 34 Annex A - Military Campaign Objectives 39 Annex B - Chronology 41 Annex C - Deployed Forces and Statistics 43 1 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence On 20 March 2003 a US-led coalition, with a substantial contribution from UK forces, began military operations against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. Just 4 weeks later, the regime was removed and most of Iraq was under coalition control. The success of the military campaign owed much to the determination and professionalism of the coalition’s Armed Forces and the civilians who supported them. I regret that, during the course of combat operations and subsequently, a number of Service personnel lost their lives. Their sacrifice will not be forgotten. The UK is playing a full part in the re-building of Iraq through the establishment of conditions for a stable and law-abiding Iraqi government. This process will not be easy after years of repression and neglect by a brutal regime. Our Armed Forces are performing a vital and dangerous role by contributing to the creation of a secure environment so that normal life can be resumed, and by working in support of humanitarian organisations to help the Iraqi people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lessons of the Iraq War: Issues Relating to Grand Strategy
    CSIS___________________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775-3270 (To comment: [email protected] For Updates see Executive Summary: http://www.csis.org/features/iraq_instantlessons_exec.pdf; Main Report: http://www.csis.org/features/iraq_instantlessons.pdf) The Lessons of the Iraq War: Issues Relating to Grand Strategy Asymmetric Warfare, Intelligence, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Conflict Termination, Nation Building and the “New Middle East” Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair for Strategy July 3, 2003 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, All Rights Reserved. No quotation or reproduction Cordesman: The Lessons of the Iraq War 7/3/03 Page 2 Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Brian Hartman and Julia Powell of ABC for help in the research for this book, and Brian Hartman for many of the numbers on the size of the Coalition air effort, and Coalition Forces. Ryan Faith helped with the research for the chronology of events and both Ryan Faith and Jennifer Moravitz helped with the organization and editing. The reader should also be aware that this book makes extensive use of reporting on the war from a wide range of press sources, only some of which can be fully footnoted, interviews with serving and retired officers involved in various aspects of the planning and execution of the war, and the extensive work done by Australian, British, and US officers in preparing daily briefings and official background materials on the conflict. Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, All Rights Reserved. No quotation or reproduction without the express written permission of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq and After: Taking the Right Lessons for Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction
    2005 May Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction2 Iraq and After: Taking the Right Lessons for Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction by Michael Eisenstadt Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction National Defense University Washington, D.C. occasional paper JOHN F. REICHART Director Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction STAFF National Defense University W. SETH CARUS Deputy Director Since its inception in 1994, the Center for the Study of Weapons of JOHN P. CAVES, JR. Mass Destruction (previously the Center for Counterproliferation Senior Research Professor Research) has been at the forefront of research on the conse- REBECCA K.C. HERSMAN quences of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) for American Senior Research Professor security. Originally focusing on threats to the Armed Forces, the RICHARD A. LOVE WMD Center now also applies its expertise and body of research to Research Professor the challenges of homeland defense and security. In February 2004, GEOFFREY D. KIEFER President George W. Bush commended the Center for providing Research Project Specialist “vital insight into the dangers of a new era.” CREIGHTON HOTTINGER Research Project Specialist The broad mandate of the Center includes research, education, and outreach. Its research focuses on understanding the security OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES implications of weapons of mass destruction, as well as the chal- General Editor: Geoffrey D. Kiefer lenge of fashioning effective responses to them. Education and outreach programs seek to enhance awareness in the next genera- RECENT PUBLICATIONS tion of military and civilian leaders of the WMD threat as it relates to defense and homeland security policy, programs, technology, Combating WMD: Challenges for the Next 10 Years and operations.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #262
    #262 23 May 2003 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established here at the Air War College in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal Jo Ann Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953-7538 or DSN 493-7538. To subscribe, change e-mail address, or unsubscribe to this journal or to request inclusion on the mailing list for CPC publications, please contact Mrs. Eddy. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Study for Port Sector in the Republic of Iraq
    The Republic of Iraq General Company for Ports of Iraq (GCPI) MASTER PLAN STUDY FOR PORT SECTOR IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT ON SERVICE BERTH DECEMBER 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency Ides Inc. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. (NK) EI Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. (OCG) CR(1) 15-213 MASTER PLAN STUDY FOR PORT SECTOR IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ December 2015 PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT ON SERVICE BERTH The Republic of Iraq General Company for Ports of Iraq (GCPI) MASTER PLAN STUDY FOR PORT SECTOR IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT ON SERVICE BERTH DECEMBER 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency Ides Inc. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. (NK) Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. (OCG) Exchange Rates Date: June 2015 1US$ = 124.75 Japanese Yen 䝞䚷䝇䚷䝷䚷ᅜ䚷㝿䚷✵䚷 N 䝬䜻䞊䝹䠄䝞䝇䝷䠅 䜰䝤䞉䝣䝹䝇 䝞䝇䝷 䜰䝤䞉䝣䝹䝇 IRAQ 䜰䝹䝈䝧䞊䝹 SCALE 0510 20 km 䝅䝱䝖䝹䞉䜰䝷䝤Ἑ 䝞䚷䝇䚷䝷䚷ᕞ 䜲䝷䞁 䠄䜲䝷䜽䠅 N 䝁䞊䝹䞉䜰䝹䝈䝧䞊䝹 䜰䝹䞉䝣䜯䜸 Khaw Az Zubayr 䠄ᑐ㇟እ䠅 䝽䝹䝞ᓥ 䝣䜯䜸 䠄䜽䜴䜵䞊䝖䠅 䜴䞁䝮䞉䜹䝇䝹 ᪂䜰䝹䞉䝣䜯䜸 ணᐃᆅ 䜽䜴䜵䞊䝖 䝤䝡䝲䞁ᓥ 䠄䜽䜴䜵䞊䝖䠅 䜰䝷䝡䜰‴ River-2 River-1 NORTH PORT UMM QASR PORT HAJJAM ISLAND SOUTH PORT LOCATION MAP OF STUDY AREA Master Plan Study for Port Sector in the Republic of Iraq Pre-Feasibility Study Report on Service Berth Abbreviation AFGP Al-Faw Grand Port AIS Automatic Identification System C.I.I.T.I Italan Consoutium of Iraq Transport Infrastructure CMA-CGM Compagnie Maritime D'affrètement - Compagnie Générale Maritime CY Container Yard DANIDA Danish International Development Agency dB decibel D/D Detail Design DWT Dead Weight Tonnage EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIRR Economic
    [Show full text]