Caribbean Spiny Lobster Brazil Pots
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus ©Scandinavian Fishing Yearbook/www.scandposters.com Brazil Pots December 19, 2018 Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vF3 Table of Contents About. Seafood. .Watch . 3. Guiding. .Principles . 4. Summary. 5. Final. Seafood. .Recommendations . 7. Introduction. 8. Assessment. 12. Criterion. 1:. .Impacts . on. the. Species. Under. Assessment. .12 . Criterion. 2:. .Impacts . on. Other. Species. .19 . Criterion. 3:. .Management . Effectiveness. .25 . Criterion. 4:. .Impacts . on. the. Habitat. .and . Ecosystem. .30 . Acknowledgements. 34. References. 35. Appendix. A:. Extra. .By . Catch. .Species . 41. 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Watch Assessment. Each assessment synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” This ethic is operationalized in the Seafood Watch standards, available on our website here. In producing the assessments, Seafood Watch seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices. Capture fisheries and aquaculture practices are highly dynamic; as the scientific information on each species changes, Seafood Watch’s sustainability recommendations and the underlying assessments will be updated to reflect these changes. Parties interested in capture fisheries, aquaculture practices and the sustainability of ocean ecosystems are welcome to use Seafood Watch assessments in any way they find useful. 3 Guiding Principles Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether fished1 or farmed that can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. The following guiding principles illustrate the qualities that fisheries must possess to be considered sustainable by the Seafood Watch program (these are explained further in the Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries): Follow the principles of ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ensure all affected stocks are healthy and abundant. Fish all affected stocks at sustainable levels. Minimize bycatch. Have no more than a negligible impact on any threatened, endangered or protected species. Managed to sustain the long-term productivity of all affected species. Avoid negative impacts on the structure, function or associated biota of aquatic habitats where fishing occurs. Maintain the trophic role of all aquatic life. Do not result in harmful ecological changes such as reduction of dependent predator populations, trophic cascades, or phase shifts. Ensure that any enhancement activities and fishing activities on enhanced stocks do not negatively affect the diversity, abundance, productivity, or genetic integrity of wild stocks. These guiding principles are operationalized in the four criteria in this standard. Each criterion includes: Factors to evaluate and score Guidelines for integrating these factors to produce a numerical score and rating Once a rating has been assigned to each criterion, we develop an overall recommendation. Criteria ratings and the overall recommendation are color coded to correspond to the categories on the Seafood Watch pocket guide and online guide: Best Choice/Green: Are well managed and caught in ways that cause little harm to habitats or other wildlife. Good Alternative/Yellow: Buy, but be aware there are concerns with how they’re caught. Avoid/Red Take a pass on these for now. These items are overfished or caught in ways that harm other marine life or the environment. 1 “Fish” is used throughout this document to refer to finfish, shellfish and other invertebrates 4 Summary The spiny lobster is a commercially fished marine invertebrate. There are several distinct species of spiny lobster located in various areas of the world. This report provides information and recommendations for the Caribbean spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) fished in Brazil waters with traps called manzuá. The other fishing methods used to harvest spiny lobsters in these waters include bottom gillnets called caçoeira (the most popular fishing method), free diving and diving with compressors (the most popular fishing methods), and in recent years, using the artificial lobster attractor devices, called marambaias.”However, the only legal fishing method are traps. The Caribbean spiny lobster is moderately vulnerable to fishing pressure. They tend to mature quickly (around 3 years), compared to their life span of around 18 years in the Caribbean. Recently matured spiny lobsters tend to spawn once a year, while older lobsters can spawn multiple times per year and females produce around 3 million eggs; larvae can disperse widely upon hatching. The most recent stock assessments for the species in Brazil were published in 2016, 2017, and 2018. The Brazilian fishery is heavily overfished: the stock is fluctuating around a very low level compared to the 1990s. There has been a gradual decline in landings since the 1990s, though fishing mortality is nearly more than double that of natural mortality. Hence, the stock is undergoing overfishing. The impact of the commercial fishery on the Caribbean spiny lobster in Brazil is ranked red. Bycatch information are limited in Brazil, though bycatch is thought to be low. There are no national bycatch studies, though a recent bycatch study in Cearà suggested that traps used in the fishery are non-selective. The main bycatch species are snapper and white grunts. Some endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species are caught, for example, guitarfish. There are no recent discard rates available for the Brazil spiny lobster fishery, though discard rates in lobster fisheries are generally between 8% and 15%. Discards include many invertebrates, which are generally returned alive. The most common gear types used to catch spiny lobsters include gillnets and diving, which are illegal and are inadequately monitored and managed. Gillnets are non- selective, catching a variety of species including mainly corals, but can also result in the entanglement of whales and locally endangered species. About a third of Brazilian coasts are covered in coral reefs, which are vulnerable and susceptible to gillnets. Dive fisheries could be more selective but are not monitored or managed and are utilized in shallow waters where juveniles are more abundant. The impact of the fishery on other species is ranked red for Brazil. Management of spiny lobster in Brazil has not been effective at maintaining a stable, abundant population. Recent stock assessment studies conclude that the stock is heavily overfished with evidence showing that the stock may be close to collapse, but there is some evidence to show that their decline has stabilised. Brazil mandates a minimum legal size and a 6-month closed season, though poor compliance rates and high rates of "Illegal," "Unregulated," and "Unreported" (IUU) fishing significantly undermine their progress. Overall, the management of the spiny lobster fisheries in Brazil are ranked as critical due to the high levels of IUU fishing. The only legal fishing gear used to catch spiny lobsters in Brazil are traps; however, the most utilized gears are diving and gillnets. Although diving poses a small threat to the habitat, gillnets—which are found in rocky habitats—pose a risk to corals, particularly through ghost fishing. Traps result in some damage to the benthic habitat but there are some regulations to protect some portion of habitat in reserves. The ecosystem impacts from the trap-based fisheries are considered moderate. The impact of the fishery on habitats and ecosystems is ranked yellow. The spiny lobster fishery in Brazil is engaged in a Fishery Improvement Project (FIP), which is limited to