DOCSLIB.ORG

Residential Development at Pinhoe Quarry, Exeter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Residential Development at Pinhoe Quarry, Exeter TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Project name Residential Development at Pinhoe Quarry, Exeter Design note title Transport Assessment Addendum Document reference 07799-HYD-RP-TP-5001-P01 Author Tim Jopling EngTech FIHE CMILT Revision P02 Date 9 August 2019 Approved ☐ 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 This Transport Assessment Addendum (TAA) has been prepared by Hydrock for Clifton Emery Design. The purpose of this TAA is to review the previous highways related planning submissions associated with the outline consent granted by Exeter City Council (ECC) for the proposed redevelopment of Pinhoe Quarry, in Exeter (PA10/2088/01). The outline consent consists of: - Full permission for re-profiling of quarry to provide platform for accommodation of residential development and outline permission for up to 380 residential units, community facilities, shop, associated open spaces (including allotments) and infrastructure (all matters reserved for future consideration apart from access) 1.1.2 The quarry re-profiling work has been completed and a reserved matters application for the outline element is now to be submitted. Given the passage of time between the original Transport Assessment (TA) submission, which presented traffic modelling data based on 2007 traffic surveys, the Local Highway Authority (LHA) being Devon County Council (DCC) has requested that the TA be reviewed and updated as necessary. 1.1.3 This TAA will examine the various highways and transportation issued covered in the submitted TA and providing the necessary updates with the intention of providing both the LHA and the Local Planning Authority (LPA) with comfort that the residential development will have the anticipated highway impacts suggested in the submitted TA. 1.2 Background 1.2.1 The transport strategy outlined in the submitted, and previously approved TA, had developed around a balanced and integrated package of measures that sought to mitigate the vehicular impacts of the development on the local highway network, as they were then forecast to be and to enhance development related movement by alternative modes to the private car, thereby supporting the sustainable redevelopment of the site. 1.2.2 The submitted TA is divided into eight sections, the first being an introduction. The remaining seven sections were:- Section 2 - provided a review of national and local transport policies in relation to the Pinhoe Quarry site. Section 3 - provided a description of the site in its strategic and local context in terms of access to the local and wider transport network. This section considered the site in relation to its local facilities and amenities as well as reviewing the operational performance and safety of the local highway network. TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM | Residential Development at Pinhoe Quarry, Exeter | 07799-HYD-RP-TP-5001-P01 | 9 August 2019 1 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Section 4 - presented the proposed site access and wider transport strategy for the proposed development, considering access and movement to and from the site for pedestrians, cyclists, public transport and vehicular traffic. Vehicular and cycle provision were also considered within this section. Section 5 - considered the anticipated travel demand resulting from the development proposals and provided detailed analysis of predicted person and vehicle trip generation and modal splits of journeys to and from the site. This section also discussed the measures proposed anticipated to have an impact on travel behaviour within the local community as well as for the proposed residential site. Section 6 - considered the transport impact of the proposed development. Information on the proportional impact and detailed capacity assessments for key local junctions was presented. Section 7 - summarised the mitigation measures discussed in Section 4 of the submitted TA and discusses whether any infrastructure improvements were required following the traffic impact assessment. Section 8 - provided a summary of the findings of the TA and identified the key transport issues, opportunities and objectives for the Pinhoe Quarry residential development proposal. 1.2.3 This TAA will review these sections in turn, updating or amending them as required to reflect the passage of time between the submission of the TA at Outline to the current reserved matters application some 10 years later. 1.2.4 Figure 1.1 shows the proposed Master Plan layout. Figure 1-1 – Proposed Master Plan Layout 1.2.5 The site consists of a self-contained highway network that has been designed in accordance with the Manual for Streets (MfS) and the Devon County Council Design Guide and will be offered for adoption under a Section 38 agreement. Both vehicular access general arrangements were approved as part of the outline planning consent. TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM | Residential Development at Pinhoe Quarry, Exeter | 07799-HYD-RP-TP-5001-P01 | 9 August 2019 2 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM 1.2.6 Predominantly the highway spine network will have a nominal with of 5.5m with provision of two 2m footways, with smaller side streets reduced down to 4.8m and being of a shared surface nature. Speed reduction features such as localised narrowing’s and raised table junctions have been employed across the site. A 3.5m wide shared use footway/cycleway route is proposed as agreed with DCC highways and will allow residents access to the local cycle network. 1.2.7 Shared surface highway will be implemented where it is appropriate, however the use of block paving has been minimised in adopted areas (subject to S38) to suit DCC highways preference. Table top areas will be provided with raised rumble strip type ramps (with setts set in concrete) to ensure adoption. 1.2.8 Primarily, the development will look to achieve the following objectives: - • Create a safe and nuisance-free environment for all residents and road users, prioritising pedestrians and cyclists; • Provide pedestrian linkage to existing public open space located adjacent to the development; • Reflect the speed of traffic appropriate to the location and use; • Provide car parking in a way that does not result in problems to road users, including cyclists and pedestrians, and does not result in the street scene being dominated by parked vehicles; and, • Allow for the requirements of access by service and emergency vehicles as necessary. 1.2.9 The Section 106 agreement secured a travel plan and significant financial contributions towards sustainable transport, measures outlined in the travel plan and a car club. In addition, the Section 106 included significant financial contributions towards local highway improvements. These contributions and the measures outlined in the Travel Plan target a modal shift to more sustainable transport, which will complement the design strategy of prioritising pedestrians and cyclists within the development and creating connections with the wider area. 1.2.10 To accord with the 'ECC Sustainable Transport Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)' regarding sustainable transport provision that developments should include, a 'car club' will be encouraged at the site and electric vehicle charging points provided where necessary. 1.2.11 There is also an aspiration to tie the site into the wider cycle/shared use route that is currently under consideration of Devon County Council (DCC) Highways. In line with this it is proposed that the onsite shared use path will tie into the future DCC shared use link at the western junction with Harrington Lane. 1.2.12 In regard to car parking, it is considered that due to the site being located out of town and the fact that it is important to ensure that the new development does not result in on street parking occurring on the local highway network from residents associated with the site, the proposed parking provision on- site is considered appropriate. TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM | Residential Development at Pinhoe Quarry, Exeter | 07799-HYD-RP-TP-5001-P01 | 9 August 2019 3 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM 2. POLICY & GUIDANCE 2.1 Preface 2.1.1 Rather than simply review the previous Policy and Guidance as presented in the submitted TA, this section updates the Policy and Guidance to that regarded as being relevant in 2019. This demonstrates that the reserved matters application is compliant with current relevant transport and highways policy and guidance. 2.2 National Policy National Planning Policy Framework 2.2.1 The NPPF, updated in February 2019, sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these should be applied. The NPPF is a material consideration in planning decisions. 2.2.2 Chapter 9 deals with promoting sustainable transport, with Paragraph 102 setting out the consideration of transport issues: “Transport issues should be considered from the earliest stages of plan-making and development proposals, so that: the potential impacts of development on transport networks can be addressed; opportunities from existing or proposed transport infrastructure, and changing transport technology and usage, are realised – for example in relation to the scale, location or density of development that can be accommodated; opportunities to promote walking, cycling and public transport use are identified and pursued; the environmental impacts of traffic and transport infrastructure can be identified, assessed and taken into account – including appropriate opportunities for avoiding and mitigating any adverse effects, and for net environmental gains; and patterns of movement, streets, parking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Millwood Homes Purpose of the Exhibition
    Pinn Court Farm Proposed Development Welcome to Millwood Homes Millwood Homes is a leading South West developer based in Ashburton. With almost thirty years of house building 1. Clarement Fields @ Hatherleigh experience we have a track record of developing high quality homes across Devon. Our current developments 2. Upton House @ Sharkham Village, Brixham 3. Littlewood Meadow, Hatherleigh include an impressive 91 unit site at Sharkham Village, Brixham. Glebe View at Hatherleigh and our most recently 4. Townland Rise, Petrockstowe commenced 25 unit development at Spreyton. 5. The Barns, Broadhempston 6. Borohayes, Moretonhampsted Millwood Homes continually strives to fulfil it’s desire to be a house builder of excellence and to deliver the best 7. St. Marys House @ Sharkham Village, Brixham designs and quality possible on each individual site. As a company, we lead and develop a wide variation of local projects, many with difficult engineering issues, which is one of Millwood’s strongest attributes. This results in delivering schemes that sit naturally within a landscape to enhance and fulfil Devon’s housing requirements, whilst remaining sympathetic to it’s immediate surroundings. Purpose of the Exhibition The purpose of this exhibition is to seek the views of the local community toward the proposed development at Pinn Court Farm. A number of display boards have been prepared that show how we think the site can be best developed. We hope that feedback from this exhibition will enable us to better understand what uses the local community would like to see on the site should the development go ahead. The feedback we receive will be taken on board and will form part of our planning application to East Devon District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker Land, Hollow Lane Design and Access Statement Submitted in Support of a Full Planning Application
    Baker Land, Hollow Lane Design and Access Statement Submitted in support of a Full Planning Application October 2018 CUMBERLAND WAY Application Area - 1.37 ha (approx) Higher Furlong 47.5m P 48.8m Arran Gardens N 47.2m P2 27.09.18 Issue for Planning AW / PO P1 12.09.18 Issue for Planning AW / PO REVISION DATE COMMENTS AUTHOR / CHECKED HOLLOW LANE Application area FigureED Bdy1: The site in the surrounding context TITLE Baker Land Hollow Lane CR 2 DETAIL Site Location Plan DATE SCALE L H C G R O U P September 2018 1:1250 @A4 w w w . l h c . n e t DRAWING No. REV AUTHOR / CHECKED 18003 - BAK - L01.01 P2 AW / PO EXETER 01392 444334 PLYMOUTH 01752 669368 DRAWING - STATUS PLANNING CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. ONLY FIGURED DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE WORKED FROM. DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING. © THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT. Hessary Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background & Context 3.0 Detailed Proposals 4.0 Architectural Design 1.1 Introduction 2.1 Policy Background 3.1 Proposed Detailed Scheme 4.1 Local Context 1.2 The Purpose of the Document 2.2 Visual Appraisal 3.2 Amount of Use 4.2 Appearance 1.3 The Site in Context 2.3 Summary of Site Parameters 3.3 Access 4.3 Building Design 1.4 Building for Life 12 Assessment 3.4 Parking Strategy 3.5 Refuse Strategy Appendix A - Building for Life 12 3.6 Garden Sizes Assessment 3.7 Landscape Strategy Date: October 2018 Project: Baker Land, Monkerton, Exeter | 18003/BAK/RT01/E Produced by: .WA Date: Oct 2018 Checked by: .O P Date: Oct 2018 3 1.0 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Consultation December 2022 2 | Timetable Consultation December 2022
    Timetable consultation December 2022 2 | Timetable Consultation December 2022 Contents 3 Foreword 4 About this consultation South Western Railway 5 who we are and what we do 7 About Network Rail 8 Context 12 Passenger forecasts Route by route specifications 16 Main Suburban routes 21 Windsor routes 27 Mainline routes 14 34 West of England routes 37 Island Line routes 37 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads 37 Heart of Wessex 39 Outcomes 41 FAQs 42 Feedback questions and how you can respond 43 What happens next? Some images in this document were taken before Covid. 3 | Timetable Consultation December 2022 Foreword We are acutely aware that in the past we have responded to ever growing customer demand by increasing the number of trains on the South Western Railway (SWR) network, often at the expense of the performance and reliability of our services. But, as we emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic, we have a unique opportunity to build back a better railway for the future. Since March 2020, we have been supported by SWR, Network Rail and the Department for the Government to run a reduced service that has Transport are therefore undertaking a strategic kept key workers moving. This period has shown review of our timetable. We are proposing changes that our performance improves significantly when which, while resulting in a slight reduction in we are able to run fewer trains while still meeting frequencies, will still deliver capacity at 93% of customer demand for our services. Customer pre-Covid levels and improve significantly on the satisfaction has also increased in this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for Exeter
    Innova tions in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans for low-carbon urban transport Action Plan for Exeter June 2019 Innovations in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans for low-carbon urban transport Exeter Overview _________________________ © InnovaSUMP Project Partnership and Devon County Council, England This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the InnovaSUMP Project Communication unit and the respective partner: Devon County Council Citation: Interreg Europe Project InnovaSUMP Action Plan Devon County Council, England InnovaSUMP project communication unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this action plan as a source, to e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Devon County Council and in no way reflect the views of the InnovaSUMP partnership, the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user. The InnovaSUMP project partnership and the specific partner assume no responsibility for any consequences arising from use of the information described within this document. June 2019 Action Plan 2 Innovations in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans for low-carbon urban transport Interreg Europe Programme Interreg Europe Programme of interregional cooperation helps regional and local governments across Europe to develop and deliver better policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Internaonal Conference on Climate Science and Climate Services
    The European Climate Observaons, Modelling and Services (ECOMS) iniave was formed in June 2012 to ensure close coordinaon and cooperaon across European Commission funded climate modelling and climate services projects and to act as an advisory group / think tank to idenfy priories and research and investment needs in the field of climate modelling and services. ECOMS is promoted by Internaonal Conference on the European Commission and led by three European projects: SPECS, EUPORIAS and NACLIM. It includes representaves of the other European framework programme 7 projects on climate research and infrastructure. Climate Science and Climate Services Aim is to develop new scienƟfic capability and prototype services to help 05 - 07 October 2016 at Met Office, Exeter, UK decision-makers in climate-sensiƟve sectors on seasonal to decadal Ɵmescales. SPECS has been undertaking research and disseminaon acvies to deliver a new generaon of climate predicon Recent advances in our understanding and forecasng of climate and systems for seasonal-to-decadal me scales as well as to provide climate change have brought us to the point where skilful and useful aconable climate informaon for a wide range of users.The predicons are being made. These forecasts hold the potenal for improved understanding and seamless predicons offer beer being of great value for a wide range of decision-makers who are esmates of the future frequency of high-impact, extreme affected by the vagaries of the climate and who would benefit from climac events and of the predicon uncertainty. New services understanding and beer managing climate-related risks. However, to convey climate informaon and its quality have been used.
    [Show full text]
  • SWR CCIF 2020-2022 Schemes Full List - Island Line
    SWR CCIF 2020-2022 schemes full list - Island Line Station or Nearest Organisation Project Name Description of project CCIF Funding Station an arts project delivering a programme of artist led outreach workshops engaging local isolated and disadvantaged people in the eight station Independent Arts 8 miles communities to create a lasting legacy of publicly Island Line £20,000.00 exhibited art works, demonstrating trainlines can be a unifying, inspiring and positive force at the heart of communities. To provide changing places accessible toilet at Ryde Esplanade Ferry Terminal, to be used by Hovertravel Changing Places Ryde Esplanade £30,000.00 both ferry passengers, rail users and wider community An inclusive and accessible project will involving integenerational research to provide a range of heritage trails across Shanklin Bay, Beaches (war-time and recreational); Bars (a trail of pubs Shanklin SVYCC Bay, Beaches, Bars, Battles and Buildings Shanklin £4,500.00 past and present); Battles (Commonwealth War Graves and World War sites – VC’s born in Shanklin Bay); and Buildings of significance (Churches, Theatres, Lift, Cinemas) The project will install digital information display boards, one at Shanklin Railway Station and the other at Shanklin Theatre displaying information Shanklin Theatre and Community and Tourist Digital Information on transport links and other community activity Shanklin £22,539.00 Community Trust Boards within Shanklin, and transport information and rail times for onward journeys to Ryde, Portsmouth and beyond. Providing
    [Show full text]
  • Route Strategic Plan | 2019 to 2027 Wessex Route
    Route Strategic Plan | 2019 to 2027 Wessex Route Trusted by our customers to deliver a safe and reliable railway in Wessex Version 4.30 – March 2019 Wessex Route Strategic Plan Contents 1. Foreword and summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Route objectives ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 3. Safety .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 4. Train performance ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 5. Locally driven measures ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 6. Sustainability and asset management capability ................................................................................................................................................. 36 7. Financial performance.........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pinhoe Station Interchange PDF 606 KB
    PTE/21/16 Exeter Highways and Traffic Orders Committee 15 March 2020 Pinhoe Station Interchange Report of the Head of Planning, Transportation and Environment Please note that the following recommendations are subject to consideration and determination by the Committee before taking effect. Recommendation: It is recommended that: (a) The proposed Pinhoe station car park interchange, as shown in Appendix I, be approved for construction at an estimated cost of £249,500; and (b) the Head of Planning, Transportation and Environment be given delegated powers, in consultation with the Chair of HATOC and the local member, to make minor amendments to the scheme details. 1. Background/Introduction Pinhoe is an area of significant new housing, with several thousand new homes in Exeter and East Devon within a mile of the station. The station is also in close proximity to employment at Exeter Business Park, Exeter Science Park and the Met Office. Pinhoe Railway Station is currently served by hourly trains on the West of England mainline between Exeter and London Waterloo. Improving facilities at the station will help increase the attractiveness of rail by improving options to switch to cycle or bus for the first/last leg of the journey to employment in the vicinity. Pinhoe Station Interchange is identified in the April 2020 Transport Infrastructure Plan, the 5 year Action Plan of the Exeter Transport Strategy 2020-2030 and the Pinhoe Area Access Strategy (PAAS). The project is part grant funded by the South Western Railway (SWR) Customer and Communities Improvement Fund (CCIF), which supports projects with a community benefit &/or seek to address an area of social need across the SWR network.
    [Show full text]
  • Exe Rail Progress Report February 2017 Marsh Barton Station
    Exe Rail Progress Report February 2017 Marsh Barton Station • Construction delayed due to the need to revise designs to meet changing Network Rail standards. • Likely to have an impact on scheme cost but this is yet to be fully quantified. • DCC submitted a £3m bid to the New Stations Fund – the result of which is expected to be announced in the spring. • The start date for works will be no earlier than Autumn 2017. Currently looking into options to minimise length of construction programme. Peninsula Rail Task Force (PRTF) • Five Local Authorities (Devon, Torbay, Plymouth, Somerset & Cornwall) worked together to produce a 20 year strategy report. • Three Point Plan - Resilience - Connectivity through improved journey times - Capacity/Quality • Final report submitted to Government in November and are now awaiting a response. • Reopening of line from Bere Alston to Tavistock, strengthening of sea wall at Dawlish, improvements to Waterloo line, resumption of regular services to Okehampton and flood defence at Cowley Bridge all mentioned Exeter St David’s Station Forecourt • DCC is working with Great Western Railway, Network Rail and Exeter City Council to develop a masterplan for new station forecourt at Exeter St Davids. • Key feature of this masterplan include the relocation of car parking; promotion of space for commercial and residential development; and the location of drop off points and bus stops. • Plans to upgrade the depot to the rear of the station – this is required to accommodate the rolling stock from December 2018. Exeter-Honiton • DCC recently submitted a bid to the Government’s Local Majors Fund seeking £2.5m for design work to improve capacity and resilience for the route between Exeter and Castle Cary via Yeovil.
    [Show full text]
  • NETWORK RAILCARD AREA to Leicester and Birmingham Services Are Omitted
    CDLONDON NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY WEST MIDLANDS RAILWAY LONDON NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY F EAST MIDLANDS RAILWAY LONDON EAST MIDLANDS RAILWAY H EAST MIDLANDS RAILWAY J GREATER GREATER ANGLIA K Peak-hour or limited service routes and/or NOTES: This map is a guide to services provided by the train WEST MIDLANDS RAILWAY to Nuneaton VIRGIN TRAINS to Kettering, Leicester, Derby, NORTH to Nottingham, Sheffield, GREATER ANGLIA ANGLIA to Lowestoft to Wolverhampton, to Walsall to Stafford, Crewe, the north west and Scotland Nottingham and Sheffield EASTERN G Manchester and Liverpool King’s Lynn to Norwich to Norwich stations (in Train Company colours) operators on weekdays but does not guarantee direct trains Stafford, Crewe the north west RAILWAY between the stations shown; some peak period and limited BIRMINGHAM Adderley Lea Marston E to Yorkshire, CROSSCOUNTRY Watlington Independent heritage railway with National and Scotland NEW STREET Park Stechford Hall Green Hampton- Tile COVENTRY NETWORK RAILCARD AREA to Leicester and Birmingham services are omitted. in-Arden Berkswell Hill Canley the north east, Downham Market Rail interchange and through ticketing TRANSPORT for WALES and Scotland available (see note in station index below) WEST MID’S RAILWAY RUGBY Long Buckby BEDFORD A few services do not operate and some stations are not LNWR PETERBOROUGH Littleport Interchange station (black rings) served in the early mornings and late evenings, or at VIRGIN TRAINS Bedford St. Johns Whittlesea March Manea Bury weekends and on public holidays. CROSSCOUNTRY NORTHAMPTON
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information Request 00
    Freedom of Information Act 2000 Information Request: 5110196 Date of Request: 16/08/2016 Date of Disclosure: 13/09/2016 Request and Response Please find Devon County Council’s response to each of your questions below: Please provide a copy of the business case regarding the introduction of the staff car parking charges at great moor house during the Summer of 2016 detailing the cost benefit analysis. Please provide a copy of the minutes of the meetings regarding the introduction of the car parking charges at great moor house. Please provide a copy of the decision records over the introduction of the car parking charges at great moor house. These measures are being introduced to improve the management of the car park and in line with DCC corporate car parking policy (as attached) which was approved following the implementation of the County Hall Travel Plan in November 2009. This clearly sets out the approval for introducing parking charges at any DCC site. The need to look at implementing a new management system for Great Moor House was set out and approved in a paper to CSLT on 24 February 2015. This report clearly sets out the case for introducing a managed car park solution for Great Moor House. The proposals were subsequently discussed and approved by Corporate Leadership Team on 5 May 2016: Corporate Leadership Team Confidential Decision and Action Log 5 May 2015 Present Phil Norrey (Chair), Mary Davis, Virginia Pearson, Jan Shadbolt and John Smith. Apologies Heather Barnes & Jennie Stephens. 65/15 Car Parking at Great Moor House and Barnstaple Strategic Centres Confidential Rob Parkhouse and Matthew Jones attended for this item.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Dawlish Additional Line Study
    Appendix to the 20 year plan 21/11/2016 Page 0 Contents 1. Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Resilience ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Journey Times and wider connectivity ................................................................................13 2.2.1. Wider Connectivity .........................................................................................................14 2.3. Capacity and Comfort .............................................................................................................17 2.4. The Productivity Gap ...............................................................................................................19 3. What is required? .....................................................................................................................21 3.1. Resilience ....................................................................................................................................21 3.2. Journey Time Improvements and wider connectivity ......................................................26 3.2.1. Journey Time Improvements .........................................................................................26
    [Show full text]