Little Whip Snake (Suta Flagellum) Draft Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Little Whip Snake (Suta Flagellum) Draft Strategy

SAVING OUR SPECIES Help save the Little Whip Snake Suta flagellum Saving our Species aims to improve knowledge of threatened species and increase understanding of how to manage threats critical to their survival. This data-deficient species strategy was developed by experts and identifies the priority research and/or survey actions required to address critical knowledge gaps currently inhibiting effective management of the species. The objective of this strategy is to fill those knowledge gaps to inform the development of a targeted management strategy. Saving our Species is based on a cost-effective approach that Conservation status maximises the number of threatened species and ecological in NSW: communities conserved through on-ground management action. If Vulnerable you want to contact us please email [email protected] Commonwealth Map of Little Whip Snake occurrence status: N/A Saving our Species management stream: Data-deficient species Species profile: http://www.environment.nsw.g ov.au/threatenedspeciesapp/p rofile.aspx?id=10774 Saving our Species delivers on the NSW Government's legislative requirements under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. Species occurrence(*) Priority research and survey actions for the Little Whip Snake Photo: Damon Oliver Knowledge gap Priority action *Recorded species sightings Insufficient understanding of Undertake targeted surveys for the (BioNet). distribution and/or abundance species in areas identified as suitable habitat. Where located, investigate threats operating on the population. Insufficient understanding of Undertake research into basic biology species/community ecology and habitat requirements. Investigate the factors influencing population dynamics. Find out more about our program Visit http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/savingourspecies.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Recent Taxonomic Changes and Additions to the Snake Fauna of New
21 assessments had been undertaken that did Recent taxonomic changes and additions not result in an application for an agreement or to the snake fauna of New South Wales a statement. 24 assessments were currently being Steve Sass1,2 undertaken, of which: 1EnviroKey, PO Box 7231, Tathra NSW 2550 5 would definitely result in an application 2Ecology & Biodiversity Group, Charles Sturt University, 9 would definitely not result in an application Thurgoona, NSW 2541 10 were undecided/not sure [email protected] To a significant degree, the future of the BioBanking program is in our hands. As Assessors, it is our role to Since the ‘Complete Guide to the Reptiles of introduce the idea to our clients and sell the concept. Australia‛ was first published in 2003, more than 80 No matter how cynical you might be about the reptile species have been added to the list of described modelling, the data upon which it is built, access to reptile species in Australia, bringing the total number the program, the cost of training or the unusual to 923 in the third and most recent addition (Wilson application of the program in part of western Sydney: and Swan 2010). These additions being the result of you must admit that it provides a mechanism to get newly discovered species, naming of previously important privately-owned pieces of country into a undescribed species, and taxonomic reviews of perpetual reserve network. If it is not achieving that, various species and genera. This has resulted in then it is partly our fault and we need to work at it.
[Show full text]
Frogs & Reptiles NE Vic 2018 Online
Reptiles and Frogs of North East Victoria An Identication and Conservation Guide Victorian Conservation Status (DELWP Advisory List) cr critically endangered en endangered Reptiles & Frogs vu vulnerable nt near threatened dd data deﬁcient L Listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act (FFG, 1988) Size: of North East Victoria Lizards, Dragons & Skinks: Snout-vent length (cm) Snakes, Goannas: Total length (cm) An Identiﬁcation and Conservation Guide Lowland Copperhead Highland Copperhead Carpet Python Gray's Blind Snake Nobbi Dragon Bearded Dragon Ragged Snake-eyed Skink Large Striped Skink Frogs: Snout-vent length male - M (mm) Snout-vent length female - F (mm) Austrelaps superbus 170 (NC) Austrelaps ramsayi 115 (PR) Morelia spilota metcalfei – en L 240 (DM) Ramphotyphlops nigrescens 38 (PR) Diporiphora nobbi 8.4 (PR) Pogona barbata – vu 25 (DM) Cryptoblepharus pannosus Snout-Vent 3.5 (DM) Ctenotus robustus Snout-Vent 12 (DM) Guide to symbols Venomous Lifeform F Fossorial (burrows underground) T Terrestrial Reptiles & Frogs SA Semi Arboreal R Rock-dwelling Habitat Type Alpine Bog Montane Forests Alpine Grassland/Woodland Lowland Grassland/Woodland White-lipped Snake Tiger Snake Woodland Blind Snake Olive Legless Lizard Mountain Dragon Marbled Gecko Copper-tailed Skink Alpine She-oak Skink Drysdalia coronoides 40 (PR) Notechis scutatus 200 (NC) Ramphotyphlops proximus – nt 50 (DM) Delma inornata 13 (DM) Rankinia diemensis Snout-Vent 7.5 (NC) Christinus marmoratus Snout-Vent 7 (PR) Ctenotus taeniolatus Snout-Vent 8 (DM) Cyclodomorphus praealtus
[Show full text]
A List of the Vertebrates of South Australia
VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALI,A ?s BDITBD BY !líi C.H.S. WATTS ie4 l i ` er'P^{q L' C" /PA', o s VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA EDITED BY C.H.S. WATTS South Australian Museum Prepared by the curators of vertebrates at the South Australian Museum and officers of the Information Systems Branch, Department of Environment and Planning Published by the Biological Survey Coordinating Committee and the Department of Environment and Planning, South Australia. Adelaide 1990 ® Department of Environment and Planning South Australia 1990 First edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Design and layout by Technical Services Division Department of Environment and Planning ISBN 0 7308 0482 8 Index no. 11821 Introduction 1 Environmental Provinces of South Australia 5 Mammals 7 Birds 21 Reptiles & Amphibians 55 Freshwater Fishes 69 Index of Common Names 79 Index of Generic Names 81 SYMBOLS USED Ex =Extinct 2 E = Endangered 2 V = Vulnerable 2 R= Rare 2 I = Indeterminate Status 3 C= Common (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 U= Uncommon (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 O= Occasional (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 * Introduced Species + = Only nominate subspecies in South Australia ()= No specimen in S.A. Museum collections # = Only recorded from artificial habitats (p.69) (Fishes only) ? = Questionable Record 1 This list includes all species of vertebrate animals reliably reported to have occurred in South Australia as free- living forms during the period of European settlement of the State. It has been prepared from a variety of published sources, (the major ones of which are cited in the various sections), and from the specimen collections held by the South Australian Museum, and, in some cases, other Australian museums.
[Show full text]
Reptile Management Plan Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade
Reptile Management Plan Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade An ecological report prepared for Daly International JANUARY 2011 Author: Report No. ER 212 Citation EnviroKey (2011) Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade. A report prepared by of EnviroKey for Daly International. Final Version. 28 h January 2011. Report No. ER 212. Commercial In Confidence All intellectual property rights, including copyright, in documents created by EnviroKey remain the property of EnviroKey. The information contained within this document is confidential. It may only be used by the person to whom it is provided for the stated purpose for which it is provided. The document must not be i mparted t o an y t hird p erson w ithout t he pr ior w ritten a pproval of EnviroKey. Disclaimer The scope of work for this report was defined by time and budgetary constraints and the availability of other reports and data. EnviroKey accept no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material in whole or in part by any third party. Information in this report is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Front Cover Photos Left to Right: Grassland Earless Dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla). Photo by Peter Robertson (Sourced from National Recovery Plan (Robertson and Evans 2009)). Striped Legless Lizard (Delma impar). Photo courtesy and used with permission from . PO Box 7231 Tathra NSW 2550 t 02 6494 5422 www.envirokey.com.au [email protected] ABN 35255478680 Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-directional beacon upgrade.
[Show full text]
The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank
The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank: Scoping the Requirements for Conservation By .Craig Dflidson and::: • Colin Hoc] re,2004) t^f.tij;" [tj i > VICTIiRIA UNIVERSITY OF T|CHNOLO iY 3 0001 00853 0182 FTS THESIS 333.954 160994 DOD ii'-'The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web; Brimbank: Scoping the Requirements for Conservation" By Craig Dodson Supervisor: Dr. Colin Hocking A thesis submitted to the Sustainability Group (Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology) as part of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science (Honours) Victoria University (June 2004) THESIS 333.954160994 DOD 30001008530182 Dodson, Craig The birds and reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank : scoping the DECLARATION This document does not contain any material that has been accepted for any reward of any other degree or diploma in any university and to the best of my knowledge, no other material that has previously been published or written by any other person is contained in this document accept where referenced in the text. Craig Dodson n AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Colin Hocking for his guidance and encouragement during the formation of my honours jjroject and thesis and a special thanks goes to the Honours Coordinator Associate Professor Paul Boon for his patience in waiting for this thesis. Thanks goes also to the post-graduate students David Steart and Mark Scarr for their help and support in the formation of my thesis and with technical assistance on the computer. My fellow honour students Carolyn Burrell and Lucy Cassar, thank you for your support, technical assistance and friendship during my honours year.
[Show full text]
Development of a Biodiversity Database Kangaroo Island
DEVELOPMENT OF A BIODIVERSITY DATABASE FOR ASSESSING CONSERVATION VALUES KANGAROO ISLAND CASE STUDY By A.C.Robinson, P.K.Gullan, K.D.Casperson and S.J.Pillman Natural Resources Group DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OF A BIODIVERSITY DATABASE FOR ASSESSING CONSERVATION VALUES KANGAROO ISLAND CASE STUDY by A.C.Robinson, P.K. Gullan*, K.D.Casperson and S.J.Pillman Biological Survey and Research Natural Resources Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia *Director Viridans Pty Ltd 1995 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect those of theCommonwealth Government, the Minister for the Environment, Sport and Territories, or the Director of the Australian Nature Conservation Agency AUTHORS A. C. Robinson, K.D.Casperson and S.J.Pillman, Biological Survey and Research, Natural Resources Group, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE 5001 P.K.Gullan, Viridans Pty Ltd, Suite 4 614 Hawthorn Road, Brighton East, Victoria 3187 CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey and Research Group, Resource Management Branch ©Director, Australian Nature Conservation Agency 1995 Cover Design Compiled from the title screen graphics of the South Australian Biodiversity Database using COREL DRAW. The upper image is the underside of a leaf of the pale groundsel (Senecio hypoleucus) and the lower image is a tail feather of the Glossy Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami) HI Development of a Biodiversity Database Abstract In South Australia, databases which contain records of species of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrate animals where the records are associated with an accurate geocode, are dispersed between a number of Government agencies including the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Department of Housing and Urban Development as well as the long term custodians of such data at the South Australian Museum and the State Herbarium.
[Show full text]
Natural Temperate Grassland of the South Eastern Highlands
Natural Temperate Grassland of the South Eastern Highlands: a nationally protected ecological community This information guide is designed to assist land managers, owners and occupiers as well as environmental assessment officers and consultants to identify, assess and manage the Natural Temperate Grassland of the South Eastern Highlands ecological community; a threatened ecological community, listed as critically endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), Australia’s national environmental law. This guide is a companion document to the approved Conservation Advice, which can be found on the Australian Government’s species profile and threats (SPRAT) database at: www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/ public/publiclookupcommunities.pl. On this webpage, click on the details link—alongside the ecological community name—to download the documents and the map for the listed ecological community. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2016. Natural Temperate Grassland of the South Eastern Highlands: a nationally protected ecological community is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia, for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This guide should be attributed as ‘Natural Temperate Grassland of the South Eastern Highlands: a nationally protected ecological community, Commonwealth of Australia 2016’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright [name of third party] ’.
[Show full text]
Supplementary Methods S1
1 Validation methods for trophic niche models 2 3 To assign links between nodes (species), we used trophic niche-space models (e.g., [1]). 4 Each of these models has two quantile regressions that define the prey-size range a 5 predator of a given size is predicted to consume. Species whose body mass is within the 6 range of a predator’s prey size, as identified by the trophic niche-space model, are predicted 7 to be prey, while those outside the range are predicted not to be eaten. 8 9 The broad taxonomy of a predator helps to predict predation interactions [2]. To optimize 10 our trophic niche-space model, we therefore tested whether including taxonomic class of 11 predators improved the fit of quantile regressions. Using trophic (to identify which species 12 were predators), body mass, and taxonomic data, we fitted and compared five quantile 13 regression models (including a null model) to the GloBI data. In each model, we log10- 14 transformed the dependent variable prey body mass, and included for the independent 15 variables different combinations of log10-transformed predator body mass, predator class, 16 and the interaction between these variables (Supplementary Table S4). We log10- 17 transformed both predator and prey body mass to linearize the relationship between these 18 variables. We fit the five quantile regressions to the upper and lower 5% of prey body mass, 19 and compared model fits using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The predator body 20 mass*predator class model fit the 95th quantile data best, whereas the predator body mass 21 + predator class model fit the 5th quantile data marginally better than the aforementioned 22 interaction model (Supplementary Figure S2, Supplementary Table S4).
[Show full text]
Werribee River: Wildlife of the Waterways
Werribee River: Wildlife of the waterways T he Werribee River estuary forms the eastern boundary of a large Ramsar wetland in north- western Port Phillip Bay. This wetland supports key environmental values for plants and animals (especially waterbirds), as well as cultural, educational, tourism and scientific values. The areas surrounding the river are home to a range of animals including birds, frogs, fish and mammals. Revegetation projects and the introduction of conservation areas have allowed wildlife to flourish and this means we can enjoy them in their natural surrounds. We have provided an overview of some of the animals you are most likely to see in the area but don’t be surprised if you see even more! Fish T he Werribee River supports rich and diverse groups of fish. A number of fish located in the Werribee River are introduced species, which tend to alter the natural environment. A survey of the Werribee River conducted in 2006 recorded 30 species of fish, including freshwater, estuarine and marine-estuarine opportunist fish. Some species move between fresh and saltwater as part of the process, and must migrate through the estuary to complete their lifecycle. Water quality (both flow and non-flow related), barriers to fish movement, habitat degradation and over-exploitation by fishing were identified as the principal threats to fish in the Werribee River. The river estuary supports several species of recreational and commercial importance, including black bream, King George whiting, yellow eye mullet and trevally. Recreational fishers target tench, brown trout, roach, short-finned eel, and river blackfish in freshwater sections of the river.
[Show full text]
Assessing the Sustainability of Native Fauna in NSW State of the Catchments 2010
State of the catchments 2010 Native fauna Technical report series Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Assessing the sustainability of native fauna in NSW State of the catchments 2010 Paul Mahon Scott King Clare O’Brien Candida Barclay Philip Gleeson Allen McIlwee Sandra Penman Martin Schulz Office of Environment and Heritage Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Technical report series Native vegetation Native fauna Threatened species Invasive species Riverine ecosystems Groundwater Marine waters Wetlands Estuaries and coastal lakes Soil condition Land management within capability Economic sustainability and social well-being Capacity to manage natural resources © 2011 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage The State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this technical report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to
[Show full text]
Risk Assessment for the Importation of Native Reptiles
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPORTATION OF NATIVE REPTILES INTO THE ACT Will Osborne and Murray Evans Technical Report 31 May 2015 Conservation Planning and Research | Environment Division | Environment and Planning Directorate Technical Report 31 Risk assessment for the importation of native reptiles into the ACT Will Osborne and Murray Evans Conservation Research Environment Division Environment and Planning Directorate May 2015 ISBN: 978-0-9871175-5-7 © Environment and Planning Directorate, Canberra, 2015 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to appropriate referencing of the source. This document should be cited as: Osborne W and Evans M. 2015. Risk assessment for the importation of native reptiles into the ACT. Technical Report 31. Environment and Planning Directorate, ACT Government, Canberra. http://www.environment.act.gov.au Telephone: Canberra Connect 13 22 81 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views, opinions or policy of funding bodies or participating member agencies or organisations. Front cover: All Photographs ACT Government. L to R: Water Dragon, Brown Snake, Bearded Dragon, Marbled Gecko. Native Reptile Import Risk Assessment Contents 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Phylogeny of Courtship and Male-Male Combat Behavior in Snakes
Phylogeny of Courtship and Male-Male Combat Behavior in Snakes Phil Senter*, Shannon M. Harris, Danielle L. Kent Department of Biological Sciences, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States of America Abstract Background: Behaviors involved in courtship and male-male combat have been recorded in a taxonomically broad sample (76 species in five families) of snakes in the clade Boidae + Colubroidea, but before now no one has attempted to find phylogenetic patterns in such behaviors. Here, we present a study of phylogenetic patterns in such behaviors in snakes. Methodology/Principal Findings: From the literature on courtship and male-male combat in snakes we chose 33 behaviors to analyze. We plotted the 33 behaviors onto a phylogenetic tree to determine whether phylogenetic patterns were discernible. We found that phylogenetic patterns are discernible for some behaviors but not for others. For behaviors with discernible phylogenetic patterns, we used the fossil record to determine minimum ages for the addition of each behavior to the courtship and combat behavioral repertoire of each snake clade. Conclusions/Significance: The phylogenetic patterns of behavior reveal that male-male combat in the Late Cretaceous common ancestors of Boidae and Colubridae involved combatants raising the head and neck and attempting to topple each other. Poking with spurs was added in Boidae. In Lampropeltini the toppling behavior was replaced by coiling without neck-raising, and body-bridging was added. Phylogenetic patterns reveal that courtship ancestrally involved rubbing with spurs in Boidae. In Colubroidea, courtship ancestrally involved chin-rubbing and head- or body-jerking. Various colubroid clades subsequently added other behaviors, e.g.
[Show full text]