DOCSLIB.ORG

Reptile Management Plan Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reptile Management Plan Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade Reptile Management Plan Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade An ecological report prepared for Daly International JANUARY 2011 Author: Report No. ER 212 Citation EnviroKey (2011) Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-Directional Beacon Upgrade. A report prepared by of EnviroKey for Daly International. Final Version. 28 h January 2011. Report No. ER 212. Commercial In Confidence All intellectual property rights, including copyright, in documents created by EnviroKey remain the property of EnviroKey. The information contained within this document is confidential. It may only be used by the person to whom it is provided for the stated purpose for which it is provided. The document must not be i mparted t o an y t hird p erson w ithout t he pr ior w ritten a pproval of EnviroKey. Disclaimer The scope of work for this report was defined by time and budgetary constraints and the availability of other reports and data. EnviroKey accept no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material in whole or in part by any third party. Information in this report is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Front Cover Photos Left to Right: Grassland Earless Dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla). Photo by Peter Robertson (Sourced from National Recovery Plan (Robertson and Evans 2009)). Striped Legless Lizard (Delma impar). Photo courtesy and used with permission from . PO Box 7231 Tathra NSW 2550 t 02 6494 5422 www.envirokey.com.au [email protected] ABN 35255478680 Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-directional beacon upgrade. Report ER 212 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE MANAGEMENT AREA .................................................................................. 1 1.2 METHODOLOGY FOR THE PREPERATION OF THIS RMP ................................ 2 1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THIS RMP ................................................................................ 2 2 THREATENED REPTILE FAUNA ................................................................ 3 2.1 GRASSLAND EARLESS DRAGON ...................................................................... 3 2.2 STRIPED LEGLESS LIZARD ................................................................................ 4 2.3 LITTLE WHIP SNAKE ........................................................................................... 5 3 ONSITE MANAGEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION................................. 6 3.1 ENGAGEMENT OF HERPETOLOGIST ................................................................ 6 3.2 CONTRACTOR INDUCTION ................................................................................ 6 3.3 PRE-CLEARANCE SURVEY ................................................................................ 6 3.4 PROCEDURES FOR WHEN OPEN EXCAVATIONS ARE PRESENT .................. 7 3.5 REPTILE RELOCATION PROCEDURES ............................................................. 7 3.5.1 Venomous reptiles ......................................................................................... 7 3.5.2 Hygiene protocols during relocation ............................................................... 8 3.5.3 Relocation Procedure during Pre-clearance Survey ...................................... 8 3.5.4 Relocation Procedure outside of Pre-clearance Survey ................................. 9 3.6 PROCEDURES FOR INJURED REPTILES .........................................................10 4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ......................................................................... 11 5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 12 6 APPENDICES ............................................................................................... I APPENDIX 1 – QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF AUTHOR ............................. II FINAL January 2011 i Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-directional beacon upgrade. Report ER 212 Figures, Plates & Tables Figure 1: Location of the Management Area (Image courtesy of Google Earth). ............... 1 Plate 1: Grassland Earless Dragon. Left Image: Photo by Peter Robertson (Sourced from National Recovery Plan (Robertson and Evans 2009)). Right Image: Photo by ACT Government (Sourced from http://incp.environment.act.gov.au/Stats/CategoryResults.aspx?statid=24&name=Grassla nd%20Earless%20Dragon) ............................................................................................... 3 Plate 2: Left: Striped Legless Lizard. Photo by Ross Bennett (Sourced from http://www.threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au/tsprofile/profile.aspx?id=10211). Right: Striped Legless Lizard hiding in soil crack (indicated by arrow). Photo courtesy and used with Permission from Melissa Doherty. ..................................................................... 4 Plate 3: Little Whip Snakes. Photos courtesy and used with permission from Melissa Doherty. ............................................................................................................................ 5 Table 1: Implementation timeframe for this RMP. ............................................................11 FINAL January 2011 ii Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-directional beacon upgrade. Report ER 212 1 INTRODUCTION Airservices Australia (ASA) has initiated the Infrastructure Tower Replacement Project in order to provide towers that meet current Australian and ASA standards to support navigational aides known as Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) antenna. EnviroKey were engaged by Daly International to undertake a Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment (FFIA) for the proposed upgrade at the Cooma NDB (EnviroKey 2010). The FFIA provided a series of recommendations in order to limit disturbance and potential impacts to Matters of National Environmental Significance, threatened species and ecological communities. One of these recommendations was that a Reptile Management Plan (RMP) be produced for the Cooma NDB upgrade. EnviroKey have been engaged by Daly International to prepare this RMP. 1.1 THE MANAGEMENT AREA The Management Area is the Cooma NDB facility located south-west of the Cooma Airport (Figure 1). The Management Area is located within the Snowy River local government area (LGA), the Murrumbidgee Catchment Management Authority region (Monaro sub-region) (DECCW 2010) and the South Eastern Highlands Bioregion (Thackway and Creswell 1995). Figure 1: Location of the Management Area (Image courtesy of Google Earth). FINAL January 2011 1 Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-directional beacon upgrade. Report ER 212 1.2 METHODOLOGY FOR THE PREPERATION OF THIS RMP The preparation of this RMP has involved two main elements. These being: • Analysis of data from the FFIA to refine the strategies and actions required to achieve the objectives of the RMP • Analysis of this data in the context of best-practice management principles. The RMP has been pr epared by a s uitably qualified and experienced Herpetologist. Details of the author are provided (Appendix 1). 1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THIS RMP This RMP details actions to minimise potential impacts to threatened reptile fauna as a result of the NDB upgrade. This plan will: • Outline details of a Preclearance Survey. This will detail the methods used for an active search of the works areas by an experienced herpetologist to remove any reptiles, including threatened reptile fauna and relocate any found to adjacent habitat prior to the direct commencement of site excavation works. • Outline details of how any reptiles including threatened reptile fauna, inadvertently trapped within open excavations for the new towers and other infrastructure will be managed during the entire construction period and decommissioning period. • An implementation plan. FINAL January 2011 2 Reptile Management Plan: Cooma Non-directional beacon upgrade. Report ER 212 2 THREATENED REPTILE FAUNA The FFIA identified that two species of threatened reptile fauna (Grassland Earless Dragon, Striped Legless Lizard) had the potential to occur within the Management Area based on the presence of potential habitat, the condition of and appropriate extent of potential habitat and known species occurrence in the wider locality (EnviroKey 2010). A third threatened reptile species, Little Whip Snake, has been recently recorded within 15kms of the Management Area, and is included in this section for completeness. This section of the RMP provides general information on all three species. 2.1 GRASSLAND EARLESS DRAGON The Grassland Earless Dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) is listed as Endangered under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, Endangered under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and Critically Endangered under the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (DECCW 2010; Wilson and Swan 2010). The species was historically known to occur in native grasslands extending from Bathurst, NSW in the north (Osborne et al. 1993b) to Melbourne, Victoria in the south (Robertson and Evans 2009). However, more recent records indicate that the Grassland Earless Dragon has undergone a dramatic decrease in its geographic distribution (Robertson and Evans 2009) suggesting that any extant populations would be extremely important to the long-term survival of the species. Plate 1: Grassland Earless Dragon. Left Image: Photo by Peter Robertson (Sourced from National Recovery Plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Keeping Venomous Snakes in the NT
    GUIDELINES FOR KEEPING VENOMOUS SNAKES IN THE NT Venomous snakes are potentially dangerous to humans, and for this reason extreme caution must be exercised when keeping or handling them in captivity. Prospective venomous snake owners should be well informed about the needs and requirements for keeping these animals in captivity. Permits The keeping of protected wildlife in the Northern Territory is regulated by a permit system under the Territory Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 2006 (TPWC Act). Conditions are included on permits, and the Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (“PWCNT”) may issue infringement notices or cancel permits if conditions are breached. A Permit to Keep Protected Wildlife enables people to legally possess native vertebrate animals in captivity in the Northern Territory. The permit system assists the PWCNT to monitor wildlife kept in captivity and to detect any illegal activities associated with the keeping of, and trade in, native wildlife. Venomous snakes are protected throughout the Northern Territory and may not be removed from the wild without the appropriate licences and permits. People are required to hold a Keep Permit (Category 1–3) to legally keep venomous snakes in the Northern Territory. Premises will be inspected by PWCNT staff to evaluate their suitability prior to any Keep Permit (Category 1– 3) being granted. Approvals may also be required from local councils, the Northern Territory Planning Authority, and the Department of Health and Community Services. Consignment of venomous snakes between the Northern Territory and other States and Territories can only be undertaken with an appropriate import / export permit. There are three categories of venomous snake permitted to be kept in captivity in the Northern Territory: Keep Permit (Category 1) – Mildly Dangerous Venomous Keep Permit (Category 2) – Dangerous Venomous Keep Permit (Category 3) – Highly Dangerous Venomous Venomous snakes must be obtained from a legal source (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Statement Floraflora and and Fauna Fauna Guarantee Guarantee Act Act 1988 1988 No
    Action Statement FloraFlora and and Fauna Fauna Guarantee Guarantee Act Act 1988 1988 No. No. ### 108 Hooded Scaly-foot Pygopus nigriceps Description and Distribution The Hooded Scaly-foot Pygopus nigriceps belongs to the reptile family Pygopodidae, the legless or flap-footed lizards. Legless lizards are superficially snake-like; they lack forelimbs, and the hind limbs are reduced to a scaly flap just above the vent. Whilst their eyes are lidless and snake-like, there are several features that distinguish legless lizards from snakes. Most legless lizards have an obvious ear aperture, lacking in all snakes, and a broad fleshy tongue, compared to the deeply forked tongue of snakes. Most legless lizards also have a tail that, when unbroken, is considerably longer than their body. In contrast, the tail of snakes is considerably Hooded Scaly-foot, Pygopus nigriceps shorter than their body. The genus Pygopus Illustration by Peter Robertson Wildlife Profiles P/L © differs from other legless lizards on the basis of the combination of the following features: head covered with enlarged, symmetrical scales; smooth (compared to keeled) ventral scales; and the possession of eight or more preanal pores. Two species of Pygopus occur in Victoria. The Hooded Scaly-foot is a large legless lizard, attaining a total length of 475mm, and a snout- vent length of about 180mm. Females reach larger sizes than males. Variable in colour, the Hooded Scaly-foot may be pale grey to reddish-brown on the dorsal surface and whitish on the ventral surface. The dorsal scales may be dark-edged, forming a reticulated pattern, or individual pale and dark scales may form a vague longitudinal pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms
    toxins Article Rapid Radiations and the Race to Redundancy: An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms Timothy N. W. Jackson 1, Ivan Koludarov 1, Syed A. Ali 1,2, James Dobson 1, Christina N. Zdenek 1, Daniel Dashevsky 1, Bianca op den Brouw 1, Paul P. Masci 3, Amanda Nouwens 4, Peter Josh 4, Jonathan Goldenberg 1, Vittoria Cipriani 1, Chris Hay 1, Iwan Hendrikx 1, Nathan Dunstan 5, Luke Allen 5 and Bryan G. Fry 1,* 1 Venom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (T.N.W.J.); [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (S.A.A.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (C.N.Z.); [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (B.o.d.B.); [email protected] (J.G.); [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (I.H.) 2 HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan 3 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 4 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (A.N.); [email protected] (P.J.) 5 Venom Supplies, Tanunda, South Australia 5352, Australia; [email protected] (N.D.); [email protected] (L.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-4-0019-3182 Academic Editor: Nicholas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Taxonomic Changes and Additions to the Snake Fauna of New
    21 assessments had been undertaken that did Recent taxonomic changes and additions not result in an application for an agreement or to the snake fauna of New South Wales a statement. 24 assessments were currently being Steve Sass1,2 undertaken, of which: 1EnviroKey, PO Box 7231, Tathra NSW 2550 5 would definitely result in an application 2Ecology & Biodiversity Group, Charles Sturt University, 9 would definitely not result in an application Thurgoona, NSW 2541 10 were undecided/not sure [email protected] To a significant degree, the future of the BioBanking program is in our hands. As Assessors, it is our role to Since the ‘Complete Guide to the Reptiles of introduce the idea to our clients and sell the concept. Australia‛ was first published in 2003, more than 80 No matter how cynical you might be about the reptile species have been added to the list of described modelling, the data upon which it is built, access to reptile species in Australia, bringing the total number the program, the cost of training or the unusual to 923 in the third and most recent addition (Wilson application of the program in part of western Sydney: and Swan 2010). These additions being the result of you must admit that it provides a mechanism to get newly discovered species, naming of previously important privately-owned pieces of country into a undescribed species, and taxonomic reviews of perpetual reserve network. If it is not achieving that, various species and genera. This has resulted in then it is partly our fault and we need to work at it.
    [Show full text]
  • Frogs & Reptiles NE Vic 2018 Online
    Reptiles and Frogs of North East Victoria An Identication and Conservation Guide Victorian Conservation Status (DELWP Advisory List) cr critically endangered en endangered Reptiles & Frogs vu vulnerable nt near threatened dd data deficient L Listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act (FFG, 1988) Size: of North East Victoria Lizards, Dragons & Skinks: Snout-vent length (cm) Snakes, Goannas: Total length (cm) An Identification and Conservation Guide Lowland Copperhead Highland Copperhead Carpet Python Gray's Blind Snake Nobbi Dragon Bearded Dragon Ragged Snake-eyed Skink Large Striped Skink Frogs: Snout-vent length male - M (mm) Snout-vent length female - F (mm) Austrelaps superbus 170 (NC) Austrelaps ramsayi 115 (PR) Morelia spilota metcalfei – en L 240 (DM) Ramphotyphlops nigrescens 38 (PR) Diporiphora nobbi 8.4 (PR) Pogona barbata – vu 25 (DM) Cryptoblepharus pannosus Snout-Vent 3.5 (DM) Ctenotus robustus Snout-Vent 12 (DM) Guide to symbols Venomous Lifeform F Fossorial (burrows underground) T Terrestrial Reptiles & Frogs SA Semi Arboreal R Rock-dwelling Habitat Type Alpine Bog Montane Forests Alpine Grassland/Woodland Lowland Grassland/Woodland White-lipped Snake Tiger Snake Woodland Blind Snake Olive Legless Lizard Mountain Dragon Marbled Gecko Copper-tailed Skink Alpine She-oak Skink Drysdalia coronoides 40 (PR) Notechis scutatus 200 (NC) Ramphotyphlops proximus – nt 50 (DM) Delma inornata 13 (DM) Rankinia diemensis Snout-Vent 7.5 (NC) Christinus marmoratus Snout-Vent 7 (PR) Ctenotus taeniolatus Snout-Vent 8 (DM) Cyclodomorphus praealtus
    [Show full text]
  • Little Whip Snake (Suta Flagellum) Draft Strategy
    SAVING OUR SPECIES Help save the Little Whip Snake Suta flagellum Saving our Species aims to improve knowledge of threatened species and increase understanding of how to manage threats critical to their survival. This data-deficient species strategy was developed by experts and identifies the priority research and/or survey actions required to address critical knowledge gaps currently inhibiting effective management of the species. The objective of this strategy is to fill those knowledge gaps to inform the development of a targeted management strategy. Saving our Species is based on a cost-effective approach that Conservation status maximises the number of threatened species and ecological in NSW: communities conserved through on-ground management action. If Vulnerable you want to contact us please email [email protected] Commonwealth Map of Little Whip Snake occurrence status: N/A Saving our Species management stream: Data-deficient species Species profile: http://www.environment.nsw.g ov.au/threatenedspeciesapp/p rofile.aspx?id=10774 Saving our Species delivers on the NSW Government's legislative requirements under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. Species occurrence(*) Priority research and survey actions for the Little Whip Snake Photo: Damon Oliver Knowledge gap Priority action *Recorded species sightings Insufficient understanding of Undertake targeted surveys for the (BioNet). distribution and/or abundance species in areas identified as suitable habitat. Where located, investigate threats operating on the population. Insufficient understanding of Undertake research into basic biology species/community ecology and habitat requirements. Investigate the factors influencing population dynamics. Find out more about our program Visit http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/savingourspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA Harold G. Cogger 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA The Squamata are members of the diapsid subclass Lepidosauromorpha, a group whose only living descendants are the lizards, amphisbaenians, snakes and tuataras. The lizards, amphisbaenians and snakes together constitute the Order Squamata (or Superorder Squamata, according to Estes 1983). Because the Squamata include approximately 95% of living reptiles, the phylogenetic position of this group within the Lepidosauromorpha, its component taxa, and their diagnostic features, have been the subject of numerous reviews (Estes & Pregill 1988; Kluge 1989). The three suborders of the Squamata include the Sauria (lizards) and the Serpentes (snakes), which are represented in Australia by diverse faunas of nearly 500 species, and 250 species, respectively. The third suborder, the Amphisbaenia, comprises a small group of worm lizards and related species which do not occur in Australia. The earliest known squamate fossils date from the late Permian and early Triassic, approximately 230 million years ago. These early fossils were already clearly lizard-like in their preserved features. Carroll (1988a) points out that lizards (the first squamates) do not appear to have originated as a result of ‘...a significant shift in behavioral patterns or the evolution of major new structural elements, but rather may be seen as resulting from the gradual accumulation of improvements in feeding, locomotion, and sensory apparatus.’ Carroll (1988b) includes among these changes the emargination of the lower temporal fenestra and the development of a joint between the upper end of the quadrate and the squamosal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Tertiary Elapid Snakes (Squamata, Colubroidea)
    Geobios 36 (2003) 573–601 www.elsevier.com/locate/geobio Mid-Tertiary elapid snakes (Squamata, Colubroidea) from Riversleigh, northern Australia: early steps in a continent-wide adaptive radiation Serpents élapidés (Squamata, Colubroidea) du Tertiaire moyen de Riversleigh, Nord de l’Australie : étapes précoces d’une radiation adaptive répandue sur un continent entier John D. Scanlon a,*,1, Michael S.Y. Lee b, Michael Archer c a Vertebrate Palaeontology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia b Department of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, Department of Palaeontology, The South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia c Directorate, The Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney 2010, Australia, and Vertebrate Palaeontology Laboratory, School of Biological, Ecological and Earth Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia Received 14 May 2002; accepted 2 December 2002 Abstract Vertebral and cranial remains of elapid snakes have been collected from fossil assemblages at Riversleigh, north-west Queensland, Australia; most are Miocene but one may be late Oligocene and another as young as Pliocene. The oldest specimen (probably the oldest elapid yet known anywhere) is a vertebra that can be referred provisionally to the extant taxon Laticauda (Hydrophiinae, sensu Slowinski and Keogh, 2000), implying that the basal divergences among Australasian hydrophiine lineages had occurred by the early Miocene, in contrast to most previous estimates for the age of this geographically isolated adaptive radiation. Associated vertebrae and jaw elements from a Late Miocene deposit are described as Incongruelaps iteratus nov. gen. et sp., which has a unique combination of unusual derived characters otherwise found separately in several extant hydrophiine taxa that are only distantly related.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Vertebrates of South Australia
    VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALI,A ?s BDITBD BY !líi C.H.S. WATTS ie4 l i ` er'P^{q L' C" /PA', o s VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA EDITED BY C.H.S. WATTS South Australian Museum Prepared by the curators of vertebrates at the South Australian Museum and officers of the Information Systems Branch, Department of Environment and Planning Published by the Biological Survey Coordinating Committee and the Department of Environment and Planning, South Australia. Adelaide 1990 ® Department of Environment and Planning South Australia 1990 First edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Design and layout by Technical Services Division Department of Environment and Planning ISBN 0 7308 0482 8 Index no. 11821 Introduction 1 Environmental Provinces of South Australia 5 Mammals 7 Birds 21 Reptiles & Amphibians 55 Freshwater Fishes 69 Index of Common Names 79 Index of Generic Names 81 SYMBOLS USED Ex =Extinct 2 E = Endangered 2 V = Vulnerable 2 R= Rare 2 I = Indeterminate Status 3 C= Common (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 U= Uncommon (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 O= Occasional (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 * Introduced Species + = Only nominate subspecies in South Australia ()= No specimen in S.A. Museum collections # = Only recorded from artificial habitats (p.69) (Fishes only) ? = Questionable Record 1 This list includes all species of vertebrate animals reliably reported to have occurred in South Australia as free- living forms during the period of European settlement of the State. It has been prepared from a variety of published sources, (the major ones of which are cited in the various sections), and from the specimen collections held by the South Australian Museum, and, in some cases, other Australian museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Australian Snake Venoms on Coagulation: Differential Potency
    Effects of Australian snake venoms on coagulation: Differential potency, biochemistry, and antivenom efficacy Christina N. Zdenek BSc., MPhil A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2020 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Venomous snakes are a valuable bio-resource for potential therapeutic drug design and development yet are also a major health hazard for society. Snakebite is a globally neglected tropical disease which disproportionately affects the poor and can cause debilitation and death. Snake antivenom is the only recommended treatment for snakebite, yet antivenom efficacy is often untested against many species for which it may be prescribed. In lieu of unethical testing in vivo, venom and antivenom tests in vitro can inform clinicians treating human and pet (domestic and livestock) snakebite victims. Australian venomous snakes (family: Elapidae; subfamily Hydrophiinae) are a specious group of some of the most venomous snakes in the world, whose bites can cause life-threatening coagulopathy (ie. disruption of blood haemostasis). This thesis focuses on Australian elapid venom effects on plasma—primarily human plasma—and the efficacy of currently available antivenoms. Chapter 1 introduces the main concepts and coagulotoxic theme and includes some redundancy with the introductions of individual chapters because all data chapters have either been published as papers or are prepared as such. For this same reason, knowledge gaps are identified within each chapter’s introduction, rather than in Chapter 1. Chapter 2 focuses on the two most coagulotoxic genera within Elapidae: taipans (Oxyuranus) and brown snakes (Pseudonaja). The toxins (FXa:FVa) responsible for the exceptional coagulotoxicity of these venoms are a complex of snake venom Factor Xa, and the cofactor Factor Va.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW REPTILE KEEPERS' LICENCE Species Lists 1006
    NSW REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE SPECIES LISTS (2006) The taxonomy in this list follows that used in Wilson, S. and Swan, G. A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia, Reed 2003. Common names generally follow the same text, when common names were used, or have otherwise been lifted from other publications. As well as reading this species list, you will also need to read the “NSW Reptile Keepers’ Licence Information Sheet 2006.” That document has important information about the different types of reptile keeper licenses. It also lists the criteria you need to demonstrate before applying to upgrade to a higher class of licence. THESE REPTILES CAN ONLY BE HELD UNDER A REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE OF CLASS 1 OR HIGHER Code Scientific Name Common Name Code Scientific Name Common Name Turtles Monitors E2018 Chelodina canni Cann’s Snake-necked Turtle G2263 Varanus acanthurus Spiney-tailed Monitor C2017 Chelodina longicollis Snake-necked Turtle Q2268 Varanus gilleni Pygmy Mulga Monitor G2019 Chelodina oblonga Oblong Turtle G2271 Varanus gouldii Sand Monitor Y2028 Elseya dentata Northern Snapping Turtle M2282 Varanus tristis Black-Headed Monitor K2029 Elseya latisternum Saw-shelled Turtle Y2776 Elusor macrurus Mary River Turtle E2034 Emydura macquarii Murray Short-necked Turtle Skinks T2031 Emydura macquarii dharra Macleay River Turtle A2464 Acritoscincus platynotum Red-throated Skink T2039 Emydura macquarii dharuk Sydney Basin Turtle W2331 Cryptoblepharus virgatus Cream-striped Wall Skink T2002 Emydura macquarii emmotti Emmott’s Short-necked Turtle W2375
    [Show full text]