DOCSLIB.ORG

Artemis Und Der Weg Der Frauen Von Der Geburt Bis Zur Mutterschaft Am Beispiel Von Kulten Auf Der Peloponnes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Artemis Und Der Weg Der Frauen Von Der Geburt Bis Zur Mutterschaft Am Beispiel Von Kulten Auf Der Peloponnes ARTEMIS UND DER WEG DER FRAUEN VON DER GEBURT BIS ZUR MUTTERSCHAFT AM BEISPIEL VON KULTEN AUF DER PELOPONNES INAUGURAL-DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DER DOKTORWÜRDE DER PHILOSOPHISCHEN FAKULTÄT I DER JULIUS-MAXIMILIANS-UNIVERSITÄT WÜRZBURG VORGELEGT VON MARIA GENNIMATA AUS THESSALONIKI (WÜRZBURG 2006) ERSTGUTACHTER: PROFESSOR DR. U. SINN ZWEITGUTACHTER: PROFESSORIN DR. R. LINDNER (†) TAG DES KOLLOQUIUMS: 18.07.2006 INHALT Vorwort ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Abkürzungsverzeichnis ........................................................................................................... 11 Einleitung – Forschungsstand ................................................................................................. 17 Methodischer Ansatz............................................................................................................... 33 I. BEISTAND DER ARTEMIS VON DER GEBURT BIS ZUR MUTTERSCHAFT: FUNKTIONS- EPIKLESEN JENSEITS DER PELOPONNES 1. GEBURT UND WOCHENBETT 1.1. Chitone, Kithone................................................................................................. 45 1.1.1. Literarische und epigraphische Belege ................................................... 45 1.1.2. Die rituelle Praxis der Kleiderweihe ....................................................... 47 1.2. Dynatera ............................................................................................................. 48 1.3. Eileithyia............................................................................................................. 49 1.3.1. Literarische Belege.................................................................................. 50 1.3.2. Epigraphische Belege.............................................................................. 50 1.3.2.1. Ägäis........................................................................................ 50 1.3.2.1.1. Thasos.................................................................... 50 1.3.2.2. Böotien .................................................................................... 51 1.3.2.2.1. Anthedon ............................................................... 51 1.3.2.2.2. Chaironeia ............................................................. 51 1.3.2.2.3. Orchomenos .......................................................... 52 1.3.2.2.4. Tanagra.................................................................. 52 1.3.2.2.5. Thespiai ................................................................. 52 1.3.2.2.6. Thisbe.................................................................... 54 1.3.2.3. Euböa....................................................................................... 54 1.3.2.3.1. Chalkis................................................................... 54 1.3.2.3.2. Eretria.................................................................... 54 1.3.2.4. Makedonien............................................................................. 54 1.3.2.4.1. Amphipolis............................................................ 55 1.3.2.4.2. Dion....................................................................... 55 1.3.2.4.3. Veroia.................................................................... 55 1.3.2.5. Ostlokris .................................................................................. 55 1.3.2.5.1. Komnina (?)........................................................... 55 1.3.2.6. Phokis...................................................................................... 56 1.3.2.6.1. Antikyra................................................................. 56 1.3.2.7. Thessalien................................................................................ 56 1.3.2.7.1. Gonnoi................................................................... 57 1.3.2.7.2. Larisa..................................................................... 57 1.3.2.7.3. Pythion .................................................................. 57 4 1.4. Euonymos........................................................................................................... 58 1.5. Genetaira, Geneteira........................................................................................... 58 1.6. Hagemone, Hekate ............................................................................................. 58 1.7. Kalliste, Ariste.................................................................................................... 62 1.8. Kolainis Epekoos................................................................................................ 62 1.9. Loch(e)ia, Eulochia, Eulochos ........................................................................... 63 1.9.1. Literarische Belege.................................................................................. 63 1.9.2. Epigraphische Belege.............................................................................. 65 1.9.2.1. Ägäis........................................................................................ 65 1.9.2.1.1. Astypalaia.............................................................. 65 1.9.2.1.2. Kos ........................................................................ 66 1.9.2.2. Attika....................................................................................... 66 1.9.2.2.1. Neu-Phaleron......................................................... 66 1.9.2.3. Böotien .................................................................................... 70 1.9.2.3.1. Thespiai ................................................................. 70 1.9.2.4. Ionien und Mysien................................................................... 70 1.9.2.4.1. Gambreion............................................................. 71 1.9.2.4.2. Milet ...................................................................... 71 1.9.2.4.3. Pergamon............................................................... 71 1.9.2.5. Makedonien............................................................................. 71 1.9.2.5.1. Karyochorion......................................................... 72 1.9.2.5.2. Stobi ...................................................................... 72 1.9.2.6. Phokis...................................................................................... 72 1.9.2.6.1. Delphi.................................................................... 72 1.9.2.7. Thessalien................................................................................ 72 1.9.2.7.1. Gonnoi................................................................... 73 1.9.2.7.2. Halmyros ............................................................... 73 1.9.2.7.3. Larisa..................................................................... 73 1.9.2.7.4. Thebai Phthiotides................................................. 74 1.10. Lysizone, Lysizonos........................................................................................... 74 1.10.1. Die rituelle Praxis der Gürtelweihe......................................................... 74 1.11. Mogostokos ........................................................................................................ 76 1.12. O(u)pis und Opitais ............................................................................................ 77 1.12.1. O(u)pis..................................................................................................... 77 1.12.2. Opitais ..................................................................................................... 78 1.13. Orthosia, Orthia .................................................................................................. 79 1.14. Praeiai................................................................................................................. 82 1.15. Soodina............................................................................................................... 82 1.16. Volosia................................................................................................................ 83 2. VON DEN ERSTEN LEBENSJAHREN BIS ZU DER KINDHEIT UND DEM ERWACHSENWERDEN 2.1. Akraia ................................................................................................................. 84 5 2.2. Aspalis ................................................................................................................ 85 2.3. Epaulie................................................................................................................ 91 2.4. Eukleia................................................................................................................ 93 2.5. Horaia ................................................................................................................. 94 2.6. Kourotrophos, Paidotrophos............................................................................... 98 2.7. Limnatis.............................................................................................................. 99 2.8. Polo..................................................................................................................... 99 2.8.1. Literarische und epigraphische Belege ................................................. 100 2.8.2. Artemis Epaulie Hekate und deren Bezug zu Artemis Polo ................. 104 2.9. Throsia.............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts
    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • Leto As Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C
    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Lavinia Foukara Leto as Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C. aus / from Archäologischer Anzeiger Ausgabe / Issue Seite / Page 63–83 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/2027/6626 • urn:nbn:de:0048-journals.aa-2017-1-p63-83-v6626.5 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion der Zentrale | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition 2510-4713 ISSN der gedruckten Ausgabe / ISSN of the printed edition Verlag / Publisher Ernst Wasmuth Verlag GmbH & Co. Tübingen ©2019 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Mit dem Herunterladen erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen (https://publications.dainst.org/terms-of-use) von iDAI.publications an. Die Nutzung der Inhalte ist ausschließlich privaten Nutzerinnen / Nutzern für den eigenen wissenschaftlichen und sonstigen privaten Gebrauch gestattet. Sämtliche Texte, Bilder und sonstige Inhalte in diesem Dokument unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts gemäß dem Urheberrechtsgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Inhalte können von Ihnen nur dann genutzt und vervielfältigt werden, wenn Ihnen dies im Einzelfall durch den Rechteinhaber oder die Schrankenregelungen des Urheberrechts gestattet ist. Jede Art der Nutzung zu gewerblichen Zwecken ist untersagt. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer Lizensierung von Nutzungsrechten wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die verantwortlichen Herausgeberinnen/Herausgeber der entsprechenden Publikationsorgane oder an die Online-Redaktion des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Scans
    12e JAARGANG 1e KWARTAAL 1947 PHILOSOPHIA R·EFORMATA ORGA,AN VAN DE VEREENIGING VOOR CALVI NISTISCHE W!JSBEGEERTE ONDER REDACTIEVA~J DR J. BOHATEC DR J. H. DIEMER DR H. DO 0 YEW EERD DR H. G. STOKER DR C. VAN TIL DR D. H. TH. VOLLENHOVEN UITGAVE J.H. KOK N.V KAMPEN HOOFOREDACTEUR: Prof. Dr H. DOOYE"\VEERD, Or anje Nassaulaan 13, Al\iSTERDAl\I-ZUID REDACTIELEDEN: Dr J. BOf-IATEC, \VEENEN Dr J. H. DIEMER, GnO?\IXGE:\ Dr H. G. STOKER, POTCIIEFSTTIOO:\1 ­ Dr C. V.A..l~ TIL, PHILADELPHIA - Dr D. H. TIl. 'VOLLENIIO\'EN, Al\ISTETIDAI\1 Secretariaat: Dr .1. P. A. Mekkes, Waalsdorperweg 245, 's Gravenhage INHOUDSOPGAVE pag. OXTWERP ENER AESTHETICA OP GROXDSLAG DER \VIJSBEGEERTE DER \VETSIDEE, II, door H. R. ROOK.l\lAAKER 1 OPVOEDI:"JG, ONDER\VIJS, SCI-lOOLVERBAKD, I, door DR K J. POPMA. .......... 36 CALYIXISME EN VOLKEKRECHT, door DR J R. STEL- LINGA •............ .. 42 ONTWERP ENER AESTHETICA OP GRONDSLAG DER WIJSBEGEERTE DER WETSIDEE DOOR H. R. ROOKMAAKER. § 10. Stijl en schoonheid aan niet-aesthetisch gequalificeerde structuren. Schoonheid aan natuurdingen is een stijlloze schoonheid 53), immers, deze schoonheid is gefundeerd in de leidende functie van het (in één van de natuurzijden gequalificeerde) ding en dus niet in de (historische) beheersende vorming. Aan alle structureel in de historische functie ge- fundeerde objectieve dingstructuren kunnen we echter stijl herkennen; het ding is immers tot stand gekomen in een menselijke vormingsarbeid.. Stijl is dus geen „privilege" voor kunstwerken, voor aesthetisch-gequa- lificeerde dingen. Zo merken we schoonheid, stijl op aan sociaal-ge- qualificeerde structuren als stoelen, glaswerk, wasbakken etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009)
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 25 | 2012 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009) Angelos Chaniotis Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2117 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2117 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 26 October 2012 Number of pages: 185-232 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 », Kernos [Online], 25 | 2012, Online since 20 November 2014, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ kernos/2117 Kernos Kernos 25(2012),p.185-232. Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009) The 22nd issue of the Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion presents a selection of the epigraphicpublicationsof2009andsomeadditionstoearlierissues.Followingthepractice ofthemostrecentissues,emphasiswasplacedonthepresentationofnew corporaand editions of new texts, rather than on summarizing books or articles that use epigraphic material.Duetodemandingresearchandadministrativeduties,thisyearIhavebeenunable tocompletethesurveyofjournalsontime.Inordertoavoiddelaysinthepublicationof Kernos , I could only present part of 2009’s publications. This issue contains several very interestingnewepigraphicfinds.Iwouldliketohighlightthenewfragmentsthathavebeen addedtothephilosophicalinscriptionofDiogenesofOinoanda( 65 ).Theymakepossible thereconstructionofalargepassage,inwhichtheEpicureanphilosopherrejectstheidea
    [Show full text]
  • The Phokikon and the Hero Archegetes (Plate54)
    THE PHOKIKON AND THE HERO ARCHEGETES (PLATE54) A SHORT DISTANCE WEST of the Boiotian town of Chaironeia the Sacred Way I Lcrossed the border into Phokis. The road went past Panopeus and on toward Daulis before turning south toward the Schiste Odos and, eventually, Delphi (Fig. 1). To reach the famous crossroads where Oidipos slew his father, the Sacred Way first had to pass through the valley of the Platanias River. In this valley, on the left side of the road, was the federal meeting place of the Phokians, the Phokikon.1 This is one of the few civic buildings from antiquity whose internal layout is described by an eyewitness.2 Pausanias says, Withrespect to size the buildingis a largeone, and withinit thereare columnsstanding along its length; steps ascend from the columnsto each wall, and on these steps the delegatesof the Phokianssit. At the far end there are neithercolumns nor steps, but a statuegroup of Zeus, Athena, and Hera; the statueof Zeus is enthroned,flanked by the goddesses,with the statueof Athenastanding on the left (1O.5.2).3 Frazersuggested that the interior of the building resembledthe Thersilion at Megalopolis.4 The location of a federal assembly hall so close to the border with Boiotia, an often hostile neighbor, seems puzzling, but given the shape of the entire territory of Phokis, the position of the Phokikonmakes sense (Fig. 2). As Philippson noted, "Die antike Landschaft Phokis ist nicht nattirlichbegrenzt und kein geographisch einheitliches Gebiet."5 Ancient Phokis was dominated by Mount Parnassos, and the Phokians inhabited two distinct 1 An earlier draft of this paper was delivered at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America (San Francisco 1990; abstract, AJA 1991, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiration and Τέχνη: Divination in Plato's
    AARON LANDRY | 85 Inspiration INTRODUCTION and Τέχνη: In Plato’s Ion, inspiration functions in con- Divination in tradistinction to technē.1 Since Ion’s rhapso- dic expertise does not stand up to Socrates’ Plato’s Ion epistemological critique, his performances of Homer cannot stem from knowledge, but from elsewhere, from divine inspiration. The two are presented as a strict disjunction. Yet in both cases there is an appeal to divination. If rhapsody, and poetry by extension, cannot synthesize the two, why does Socrates seem 2 Aaron Landry to think that divination can? This puzzle has Humber College caused quite a bit of consternation about the 3 [email protected] value and subject matter of the dialogue. In particular, it is unclear what Socrates thinks about the nature of poetic and rhapsodic ins- piration. In this essay, I will argue that divi- nation constitutes an alternate, and improved, framework for Ion to model his expertise on. By clarifying the role and scope of divination in the Ion, I aim to show that Socrates’ disjunctive account – inspiration or technē – can actually be integrated. In so doing, I argue that there are in fact positive philosophical theses latent ABSTRACT in the dialogue. In part I, I rehearse the contrasting accoun- In Plato’s Ion, inspiration functions in ts of divination in the dialogue. In the first argumentative exchange, divination is refe- contradistinction to technē. Yet, paradoxically, in both cases, there is an appeal to divination. renced as a paradigmatic technē. The seer is I interrogate this in order to show how these best equipped to speak about the contrasting two disparate accounts can be accommodat- depictions of divination given by Homer and ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions – Writing Rules in the Beginning, the Man Painted to Tell
    Instructions – Writing Rules In the beginning, the man painted to tell his stories. Gradually, with the use of symbols or letters, he began to record them. At other times, he gave three-dimensional form to his thoughts, through different types of art; by shaping the clay, carving the stone, painting with the brush, carving with a sharp tool, he created forms and concepts; he described professions, religions, habits. Every find, the work of an often unknown creator today, is the basis of the story you will create. Maybe every ancient find can help us imagine its creator. Maybe it can help us see through the eyes of the artist. We may even find out how they lived during the time these objects were made. It is time for you to describe these thoughts with your own words. Select the group that fits your age. Select a find and then select one of the literary categories. Your text should be between 200 and 2,000 words. Carefully look at the find you selected. What is your first thought when you see it? There is a hidden story you can discover. There are no right or wrong choices. This is your story. Describe what you feel, what you imagine, try to take your readers back to a distant time, through the corridors of time. In some groups, there are keywords. They are provided to help you, and, in case you want, to use them in your story. You shall not make a simple description. You are creating a new page in the find’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remains of Hesiod the Arcraean, Including the Shield of Hercules
    i'iii»iiiiii^iiii,tii^^^ '^THE REMAINS OF HESIOD THE ASCRiEAN INCLUDING €fjc M)icili of l^erailf^, TRASSLATED INTO ENGLISH RHYME AND BLANK-VERSE; WITH A DISSERTATION ON THE LIFE AND iERA, THE POEMS AND MYTHOLOGY, OF HESIOD, AND COPIOUS NOTES. \ ^ THE SECOND EDITION, ^ BEVISED AND ENLARGED ^ BY CHARLES ABRAHAM ELTON, AOrnOR OF SPECIMENS OF THE CLASSIC POETS FHOM HOMES TO TRTPtHODORUS. 'O wpsV^uf xfl9apotv yivtrdf^iva; "KiBa^mv.—AAKAIOI, LONDON: PUINTED FOR BALDWIN, CRADOCBk, AND JOY, 47 PATERNOSTER.ROW. 1815. pfi UOIO C. Halriwin, Punter, Nffw Briilac'-sircet. London. l:l PREFACE. J. HE remains of Hesiod are not alone interesting to the antiquary, as tracing a picture of the rude arts and manners of the ancient Greeks. His sublime viewa of a retri- philosophic allegories ; his elevated butive Providence and the romantic or ; elegance, daring grandeur, with which he has invested the legends of his mytholog}', offer more solid reasons than the accident of coeval existence for the tradi- tional association of his name with that of Homer. Hesiod has been translated in Latin hexameters by Nicolaus Valla, and by Bernardo Zamagna. A French translation by Jacques le Gras bears date 1586. The earliest essay on his poems by our owni " countrymen appears in the old racy version of Tlie Works and Days," by George Chapman, the trans- lator of Homer, published in 1618. It is so scarce that " " Warton in The History of English Poetry doubts SI 2 IV PREFACE. its existence. Some specimens of a work equally curi- ous fioni its rareness, and interesting as an example of our ancient poetry, are appended to this translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Herakleia Trachinia in the Archidamian War
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1993 Herakleia Trachinia in the Archidamian War Mychal P. Angelos Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Angelos, Mychal P., "Herakleia Trachinia in the Archidamian War" (1993). Dissertations. 3292. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/3292 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1993 Mychal P. Angelos HERAKLEIA TRACHINIA IN THE ARCHIDAMIAN WAR By Mychal P. Angelos A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 1993 For Dorothy ·' ,/ ;~ '\ Copyright, 1993, Mychal P. Angelos, All rights reserved. VITA The author was born in Chicago, Illinois in 1929. He first entered Loyola University of Chicago in 1946 where he followed a liberal arts program. He was admitted to the University of Chicago Law School in 1948 and was awarded the Juris Doctor degree in 1951. He was admitted to the Illinois Bar in the same year and has been in private practice as an attorney in Chicago for 41 years. In September, 1982 he enrolled in the Department of History at Loyola University of Chicago, and in January, 1985 he received the Master of Arts degree in Ancient History.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Passages from Ancient Writers Illustrative of the History of Greek
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES CHARLES W. PEPPLER, DUKE UNIVERSITY BURHAM, N. C. NOV 1 1926 GREEK SCULPTURE SELECT PASSAGES FROM ANCIENT WRITERS ILLUSTRATIVE OF THE HISTORY OF GREEK SCULPTURE EDITED WITH A TRANSLATION AND NOTES BY H. STUART JONES, M.A. FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, OXFORD ; LATE CRAVEN UNIVERSITY FELLOW FORMERLY STUDENT OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS London MACMILLAN AND CO. AND NEW YORK 1895 Ojforb HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY J7/ TO PROFESSOR PERCY GARDNER 476859 i ." PREFACE THE History of Greek Sculpture, 60x3-323 B.C., forms one of the subjects of examination in the classical school at Oxford. The only collection of ancient authorities on this subject available for study is that of Overbeck (Die antiken Schrift- quellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Kunste bei den Griechen, Leipzig, 1868). Since this work aims at completeness, it contains some thousands of passages which are not necessary for such study of Greek sculpture as is required of Uni- versity students, while, on the other hand, it provides neither translation nor commentary. I have, therefore, at the request of Professor Gardner, selected such passages as appeared from their intrinsic interest or difficulty to re- quire special study by those offering the subject for examination, adding some few to which atten- tion has been called since the publication of Overbeck's work. As a rule, the inscriptions of artists (which may be read in Lowy's In- schriften griechischer Bildhawr] have not been included, except in a few cases where the matter x PREFACE or form of the inscription seemed to make this desirable to those which are ; merely signatures reference is made in the discussions of date which follow each heading where necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Τhe Case of the Mycenaean Site of 'Kastrouli' Near Delphi
    Annals of Archaeology Volume 3, Issue 1, 2020, PP 30-40 ISSN 2639-3662 Τhe Case of the Mycenaean Site of ‘Kastrouli’ Near Delphi; Characterization of Pottery and Clay Material: A First Assessment of the Results through XRF and XRD Analyses Tonia Tsourouni* Archaeologist MA, University of Athens, Greece *Corresponding Author: Tonia Tsourouni, Archaeologist MA, University of Athens, Greece ABSTRACT Τhe theme of this prototype research concerns the analysis of selected pottery fragments (K1-K81) derived from the first excavation period of the prehistoric site "Kastrouli" in the neighboring area of Delphi. Analyses were performed on the samples by the methods XRF and XRD (along with Munsell color system) in order to identify the chemical and mineralogical elements that lead to the characterization of the clay used for the manufacture of ceramics. Moreover, analyzes were performed in clay soil samples (DS1-2-3-4), collected from surface survey in the neighboring areas of Agia Irini, Limnos and Meteles in order the local raw material to be examined. In this paper, are presented the results obtained from the analysis that focus on the chemical composition of both the clay and the raw materials. The results concern the characterization and the provenance of the pottery under study, along with the raw materials manufactured. The contribution of this study leads to the identification of the pottery and the long-term interpretation of the technology, applied by the potters at this Mycenaean site, concerning the technical level and the origin of the clay. Keywords: Mycenaean pottery, clays, XRF/XRD methods, Prehistoric site, cluster analysis INTRODUCTION It is notable that it is close to Antikyra (5km to SE) which seems to be directly related to its port The subject of this paper, as well as all the in the prefecture of Fokida in antiquity (Sideris recordings and analyzes for this purpose, were 2014, 24-26, 29-31), as well as to Itea.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucharistic Motifs in the Fantasies of CS Lewis
    Volume 22 Number 2 Article 6 1998 "Miraculous Bread… Miraculous Wine": Eucharistic Motifs in the Fantasies of C.S. Lewis Nancy-Lou Patterson Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Patterson, Nancy-Lou (1998) ""Miraculous Bread… Miraculous Wine": Eucharistic Motifs in the Fantasies of C.S. Lewis," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 22 : No. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol22/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Lewis’s use of food symbolism, and particularly Eucharistic symbolism, in his fantasy novels. Additional Keywords Drinking in C.S. Lewis; Eating and feasting in C.S. Lewis; Eucharist in C.S. Lewis; Food—Religious aspects; Food in literature; Lewis, C.S.—Attitude toward Eucharist; Lewis, C.S.
    [Show full text]