DOCSLIB.ORG

Landsat Continuing to Improve Everyday Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landsat Continuing to Improve Everyday Life How Landsat Helps: BATHYMETRY Avoiding Rock Bottom: How Landsat Aids Nautical Charting | Laura E.P. Rocchio On the most recent nautical chart of territorial waters in the U.S. Exclusive hydrographic surveying capabilities (the Above: Chart inlay of the Dry Tortugas, a grouping of islands Economic Zone (EEZ), a combined area ability to measure and map water depths). Tortugas Harbor which that lies seventy miles west of Key West, of 3.4 million square nautical miles that The job is sizable and expensive. While the Florida, Landsat data provided the extends 200 nautical miles offshore from Army Corps of Engineers is responsible surrounds Garden Key where estimated water depths for areas too the nation’s coastline. The U.S. has the for maintaining the depth of shipping Fort Jefferson is located. shallow and difficult to be reached by the largest EEZ of all nations in the world channels, providing bathymetry everywhere The depth measurements around the key (within National Oceanographic and Atmospheric but, as of 2015, it ranked behind 18 other else in U.S. waters is NOAA’s duty. } Administration’s (NOAA) surveying ships. nations in the number of vessels with the thick purple line) were made using Landsat data. It was sometime between 1840 and 1939 that the sections of water surrounding In-page: The most recent the islands were last formally surveyed. NOAA nautical chart of Since that time, Dry Tortugas National Florida’s Dry Tortugas Park was established and the park—along (Chart 11438). The purple with its hundreds of shipwrecks, pristine polygons, including the area beaches, and clear water—has become around Garden Key where popular with recreational boat cruisers. Fort Jefferson is located, Recent and accurate depth information indicate chart regions is essential for boaters, especially in the that use Landsat-derived shallows. Using bathymetry measurements bathymetry as source data. made from Landsat between 2015 and 2016, NOAA was able to provide sailors updated depth estimates in five locations, Opposite: Recreational including the area around Garden Key boaters anchored off of where the historic Fort Jefferson, a popular Fort Jefferson. The fort, destination, is located. As the National located on Garden Key in Park Service tells visitors to its website, the Dry Tortugas National NOAA’s chart of the area is “indispensable Park, Florida, is a popular for safe boating on these waters.” destination for cruisers. Photo credit: Varina Patel In NOAA’s Office of Coast Survey, the Marine Chart Division is responsible for updating the suite of over 1,000 nautical charts that keep mariners in U.S. waters safe. Their mandate covers all U.S. 15 Landsat can be made by modeling the depth of and mission planning,” said Shachak Above: Close-up of Keeping waterways safe is light penetration based on the amount Pe’eri, Branch Chief of the NOAA Chart Bechevin Bay from NOAA a massive undertaking of reflectance measured by the satellite. Standards Group and a Research Professor Chart 16520: “Unimak The responsibilities of NOAA’s Marine And when multiple visible-wavelength at the Joint Hydrographic Center at and Akutan Passes.” Chart Division are immense. Charged spectral bands are used together, the the University of New Hampshire. with providing accurate charts for effects of seafloor reflectance variability mariners, NOAA cartographers need to and water turbidity are lessened. However, The Joint Hydrographic Center, a know when existing charts are out-of- these modeled depth measurements think-tank of researchers investigating date. To determine if charts are current, typically do not meet hydrographic technology and mapping challenges in they employ lots of tools. They monitor accuracy standards, so in the past NOAA’s Office of Coast Survey, realized navigation hazard reports submitted by SDB measurements were eschewed. that Landsat SDB could be an important mariners; they watch ship traffic patterns reconnaissance tool. A single Landsat using vessel positioning information (via “There’s been a shift in the way we think,” image is about 100 nautical miles across the Automatic Identification System); explained Lieutenant Anthony Klemm, and affords a wide overview of a coastal and, more and more, they are turning to an Operations Officer on the NOAA area. Maps of SDB can be compared satellites like Landsat for information. hydrographic surveying ship Thomas with existing nautical charts. Places Jefferson and a former NOAA Corps where depth patterns do not match are The field of Satellite Derived Bathymetry Officer with the Office of Coast Survey’s more closely examined. Has the seafloor (SDB), has been around for nearly a Marine Chart Division. “In the past, if a changed in this area? If an area looks half century, but the advent of free measurement wasn’t made by the Army shallower than what is presented in Landsat data in 2008 together with Corps or a NOAA survey ship, we didn’t the chart and if there is a reasonable the 2013 launch of the more-advanced want to use it, but now we are opening amount of vessel traffic or corroborating Landsat 8 satellite, and a shift in up to other technologies to evaluate mariners’ reports in the area, the chart thinking about SDB products, have led the health of our current chart suite.” location is tagged as a higher-priority to a reinvigorated use of satellite data candidate for hydrographic mapping— in NOAA’s Marine Chart Division. Because of this sea change in thinking i.e. sending out a hydrographic ship and faced with the daunting job of to make depth measurements using The concept of SDB is that shorter deciding which charts were most in sonar (multi-beam or single-beam). wavelengths of light penetrate water to need of updating, NOAA hydrographers differing degrees. The smaller wavelengths revisited the use of SDB using freely Multi-beam sonar provides very (e.g. blue and green light) penetrate water available satellite data such as Landsat as accurate and comprehensive bathymetry, more than longer wavelengths (e.g. near a viable tool to help them do their jobs. but for the amount of water NOAA infrared, shortwave infrared). When is responsible for charting, these “NOAA has now been using Landsat water is clear and the seafloor bottom is expensive ships are in short supply. } imagery for chart adequacy assessment 16 Landsat bright (e.g. sandy), estimates of depth How Landsat Helps: BATHYMETRY Above: Visiting Fort Jefferson on Garden Key in the Dry Tortugas, a family poses for a photo on top of the nineteenth-century fort, with the shallow turquoise Gulf waters stretching out behind them. Photo credit: Andrzej Sienko, National Park Service A Landsat 8 image showing the location of Massachusetts’ Plymouth Bay (left). The right image shows Satellite Derived Bathymetry measurements overlaid on a chart of Plymouth Bay. The red indicates shallow waters. Here, the SDB indicates that the shoaling of Brown’s Bank has shifted since the chart’s creation. Klemm, who is currently onboard provide “quantifiable information related “These charts are considered a hydrographic vessel, knows well to the amount of change since the last intermediary, but they can be made the amount of time and effort that hydrographic survey,” as Pe’eri wrote, publicly available and used until goes into gathering bathymetry SDB information can figure prominently a proper hydrographic survey can information. He is excited about the into the determination of where new be performed,” Pe’eri explains. prospect of formally incorporating hydrographic surveys are most needed. Landsat SDB into his workflow. Landsat is good at identifying new Pe’eri and Klemm helped to craft NOAA’s shoals and mapping shallow areas “SDB products to evaluate the policy on the use of SDB. They outlined where survey vessels cannot go. NOAA current state of existing bathymetry how to use SDB to prioritize hydrographic thinking is that it is better to amend representation is pretty amazing because surveys using a chart adequacy assessment charts to tell mariners that satellites of the temporal resolution of the satellite procedure they developed. They also indicated a shoal, even though exact data—a little over every two weeks and helped formulate a policy on how to depths cannot be provided until you get a new shot of an area,” Klemm update charts with features found using the next hydrographic survey. } described. Landsat 8’s orbit places it satellite imagery, like the process used back over a given location every sixteen to updated the Dry Tortuga chart. days. Because satellites like Landsat can 17 Landsat Deriving bathymetry with the satellite’s Multispectral Scanner using the ship’s sonic depth finder. In Landsat for 46+ years System and its 100 nm-wide images— this pre-GPS timeframe, LORAN-C radio satellite derived bathymetry was born. measurements were used for locating Uncharted shoals have sunk many ships. the boat position. Divers also plunged In the late 1960s, research groups began In 1975, NASA teamed with famed to the seafloor to take in situ reflectance Above: This circular islet is in oceanographer Jacques Cousteau to a section of Alaska’s Prince to experiment with remote bathymetry measurements with a submarine using multispectral airborne data in conduct an ocean bathymetry experiment photometer. This early experiment proved William Sound known as using Landsat data to measure water depth Dangerous Passage. Accurate an effort to make measurements over the feasibility of mapping shoals in large tracts of coastal waters in search in the Bahamas and off of Florida’s eastern clear water to depths equal to or greater nautical charts are coast. Cousteau’s ship, Calypso, anchored indispensable for safe of navigational hazards and shifting than those needed for safe shipping. bathymetry. With the launch of Landsat 1 over a study site as Landsats 1 and 2 sailing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REPORT on the CONDUCT of the 2021 WORLD HYDROGRAPHY DAY CELEBRATION in NIGERIA-1.Pdf
    Advancements and the Future Outlook of Charting the Nigerian Navigation Channel Chukwuemeka C. Onyebuchi1, Franklin E. Onyeagoro2 and Peter O. Aimah3 1Polaris Integrated and Geosolutions Limited, [email protected] 2Federal University of Technology Owerri, [email protected] 3Polaris Integrated and Geosolutions Limited, [email protected] ABSTRACT The need for achieving safe waterways for navigation, engineering, exploration, security and other marine operations cannot be overemphasized and should be attained using precise methods and equipment. The Hydrographic process still remains the only systematic means through which spatial information about our marine environment (oceans, seas, rivers etc.) are acquired for charting purposes so as to aid analysis and decision making. In Nigeria today, most marine operations and mostly the Nigerian Navy is dependent on the Hydrographic process for smooth operations required for security, trading, engineering etc. therefore maintaining the integrity of the hydrographic process is of uttermost importance. To maintain the integrity of the hydrographic process used for charting our navigational channels, the progressive evolution of this process shall be assessed: from the earliest methods that directly sounded navigational channels using weighted lead lines and graduated poles to provide water depths to Wire Drag methods used to identify physical features on the marine environment, then to the 1930s when acoustic waves were applied in the Echo Sounder to indirectly ascertain seabed profile, and the use of instruments like Multi Beam Echo Sounders, Magnetometer, Side Scan Sonar, etc. for detailed Bathymetric and Geophysical Survey Projects, and presently to the use of Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV) and satellites in space to monitor sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Water Levels and Flow
    253 CHAPTER 5 WATER LEVELS AND FLOW 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to provide the hydrographer and technical reader the fundamental information required to understand and apply water levels, derived water level products and datums, and water currents to carry out field operations in support of hydrographic surveying and mapping activities. The hydrographer is concerned not only with the elevation of the sea surface, which is affected significantly by tides, but also with the elevation of lake and river surfaces, where tidal phenomena may have little effect. The term ‘tide’ is traditionally accepted and widely used by hydrographers in connection with the instrumentation used to measure the elevation of the water surface, though the term ‘water level’ would be more technically correct. The term ‘current’ similarly is accepted in many areas in connection with tidal currents; however water currents are greatly affected by much more than the tide producing forces. The term ‘flow’ is often used instead of currents. Tidal forces play such a significant role in completing most hydrographic surveys that tide producing forces and fundamental tidal variations are only described in general with appropriate technical references in this chapter. It is important for the hydrographer to understand why tide, water level and water current characteristics vary both over time and spatially so that they are taken fully into account for survey planning and operations which will lead to successful production of accurate surveys and charts. Because procedures and approaches to measuring and applying water levels, tides and currents vary depending upon the country, this chapter covers general principles using documented examples as appropriate for illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • Depth Measuring Techniques
    EM 1110-2-1003 1 Jan 02 Chapter 9 Single Beam Acoustic Depth Measurement Techniques 9-1. General Scope and Applications Single beam acoustic depth sounding is by far the most widely used depth measurement technique in USACE for surveying river and harbor navigation projects. Acoustic depth sounding was first used in the Corps back in the 1930s but did not replace reliance on lead line depth measurement until the 1950s or 1960s. A variety of acoustic depth systems are used throughout the Corps, depending on project conditions and depths. These include single beam transducer systems, multiple transducer channel sweep systems, and multibeam sweep systems. Although multibeam systems are increasingly being used for surveys of deep-draft projects, single beam systems are still used by the vast majority of districts. This chapter covers the principles of acoustic depth measurement for traditional vertically mounted, single beam systems. Many of these principles are also applicable to multiple transducer sweep systems and multibeam systems. This chapter especially focuses on the critical calibrations required to maintain quality control in single beam echo sounding equipment. These criteria are summarized in Table 9-6 at the end of this chapter. 9-2. Principles of Acoustic Depth Measurement Reference water surface Transducer Outgoing signal VVeeloclocityty Transmitted and returned acoustic pulse Time Velocity X Time Draft d M e a s ure 2d depth is function of: Indexndex D • pulse travel time (t) • pulse velocity in water (v) D = 1/2 * v * t Reflected signal Figure 9-1. Acoustic depth measurement 9-1 EM 1110-2-1003 1 Jan 02 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Surveys Specifications and Deliverables
    HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS SPECIFICATIONS AND DELIVERABLES March 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Change Management ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Changes from April 2018 ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Hydrographer ................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Navigable Area Survey .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Pre-Survey Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Environmental Compliance .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6 Dangers to Navigation ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Water Level Datum Relative to the Ellipsoid During Hydrographic Survey
    Measuring the Water Level Datum Relative to the Ellipsoid During Hydrographic Survey Glen Rice LTJG / NOAA Corps, Coast Survey Development Laboratory 24 Colovos Road, Durham NH 03824 [email protected] ; 603‐862‐1397 Jack Riley Physical Scientist, NOAA Hydrographic Systems and Technology Program 1315 East West Hwy, SSMC3, Silver Spring MD 20910‐3282 [email protected] ; 301‐713‐2653 x154 Abstract Hydrographic surveys are referenced vertically to a local water level “chart” datum. Conducting a survey relative to the ellipsoid dictates a datum transformation take place before the survey is used for current navigational products. Models that combine estimates for the tide, sea surface topography, the geoid, and the ellipsoid are often used to transform an ellipsoid referenced survey to a local water level datum. Regions covered by these vertical datum transformation models are limited and so would appear to constrain the areas where ellipsoid referenced surveys can be conducted. Because areas not covered by a vertical datum transformation model still must have a tide model to conduct a hydrographic survey, survey‐ time measurements of the ellipsoid to water level datum can be conducted through the vessel reference point. This measured separation is largely a function of the vessel ellipsoid height and the standard survey tide model and thus introduces limited additional uncertainty than is typical in a water level referenced survey. This approach is useful for reducing ellipsoid reference surveys to the water level datum, examining a tide model, or for evaluating a vertical datum transformation model. Prototype tools and a comparison to typical vertical datum transformation models are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Hydrographic Positioning
    HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS SPECIFICATIONS AND DELIVERABLES April 2017 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Change Management ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Changes from March 2016 .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Hydrographer ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Navigable Area Survey .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Pre-Survey Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Environmental Compliance .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.6 Dangers to Navigation ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Hydrography
    INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION MANUAL ON HYDROGRAPHY Publication C-13 1st Edition May 2005 (Corrections to February 2011) PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC BUREAU M O N A C O INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION MANUAL ON HYDROGRAPHY Publication C-13 1st Edition May 2005 (Corrections to February 2011) Published by the International Hydrographic Bureau 4, Quai Antoine 1er B.P. 445 - MC 98011 MONACO Cedex Principauté de Monaco Telefax: (377) 93 10 81 40 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.iho.int © Copyright International Hydrographic Organization [2010] This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted in accordance with the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886), and except in the circumstances described below, no part may be translated, reproduced by any process, adapted, communicated or commercially exploited without prior written permission from the International Hydrographic Bureau (IHB). Copyright in some of the material in this publication may be owned by another party and permission for the translation and/or reproduction of that material must be obtained from the owner. This document or partial material from this document may be translated, reproduced or distributed for general information, on no more than a cost recovery basis. Copies may not be sold or distributed for profit or gain without prior written agreement of the IHB and any other copyright holders. In the event that this document or partial material from this document is reproduced, translated or distributed under the terms described above, the following statements are to be included: “Material from IHO publication *reference to extract: Title, Edition] is reproduced with the permission of the International Hydrographic Bureau (IHB) (Permission No ……./…) acting for the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), which does not accept responsibility for the correctness of the material as reproduced: in case of doubt, the IHO’s authentic text shall prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Survey Using Real Time Kinematic Method for River Deepening
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository Geoinformation Science Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2011, pp: 1-14 HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY USING REAL TIME KINEMATIC METHOD FOR RIVER DEEPENING Nor Aklima Bte Che Awang and En. Rusli Othman Department of Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Geoinformation Science and Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. Email: [email protected],[email protected] ABSTRACT There is many surveys’s method in hydrographic surveying due to development of technologies. The latest development in technologies for example Global Positioning System (GPS) gives new challenges in surveying field. Surveyors use GPS technology for simple tasks or complex tasks. In hydrographic survey, the important data required are position, tidal reading and depth value. Normally, tidal reading is obtained at tidal station established near to survey area by using instrument like automatic or self-recording tide gauge. Depth of seabed is measured by using single beam or multi beam echo sounder without add up tidal value at the same time. The latest technique of getting position and depth simultaneously is by using RTK method. Key words: Real-Time Kinematic GPS, Hydrographic surveys. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Hydrographic is the science of marine surveying that determines the position of points and objects on the globe's surface and also depths of the sea. In the 1920s the technology of hydrographic changed when they found possible way to measure depths. There are many instruments have been designed to achieve better standard of surveying. With that advanced instruments, surveyor able to perform better and simple data acquisition of observation in surveying and at the same time achieve better accuracy in their observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Coast Survey Contributions to a National Ocean Mapping Strategy
    Mapping U.S. Marine and Great Lakes Waters: Office of Coast Survey Contributions to a National Ocean Mapping Strategy July 2020 Office of Coast Survey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR I am pleased to release this Office of the Coast Survey plan for contributions to a National Ocean Mapping Strategy. This timely report articulates our ongoing commitment and approach to meeting our core surveying and nautical charting mission while supporting broader societal needs to fill fundamental gaps in seafloor mapping. This is an exciting and pivotal time to be leading the nation’s primary marine mapping program. National and international interest has never been higher. Leaders are increasingly recognizing the value – indeed the necessity – of understanding the basic contours of the seafloor and marine environment to support the Blue Economy and successfully balance marine resource conservation and uses. This is clearly reflected in the June 2020 National Strategy for Mapping, Exploring, and Characterizing the United States Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).1 One of the most important goals in this Strategy is to map the U.S. EEZ, “larger than the combined land area of all 50 states, … containing 3.4 million square nautical miles of ocean.” With 54 percent of U.S. waters essentially unmapped, we have a great opportunity to conduct regional mapping campaigns, using a mix of survey techniques and technologies above, on and in the water. It is also important to make the resulting data usable and available in standard formats wherever possible. Adding emphasis to global interest in mapping the oceans, the United Nations has proclaimed a Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030), calling for an increase in ocean research to support the sustainable management of marine resources and the Blue Economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Survey Validation and Chart Adequacy Assessment Using Automated Solutions G
    US HYDRO 2019, MARCH 18-21 Hydrographic Survey Validation and Chart Adequacy Assessment Using Automated Solutions G. Masetti1,*, T. Faulkes2, C. Kastrisios1 1 Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping / NOAA-UNH Joint Hydrographic Center - Durham, NH, USA 2 NOAA Office of Coast Survey, Pacific Hydrographic Branch - Seattle, WA, USA Within the HydrOffice framework, NOAA’s Office of Coast Survey and the UNH Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping have jointly developed (and made publicly available) a pair of software solutions - QC Tools for quality control and CA Tools for chart adequacy - that collect algorithmic implementations to automate and standardize a large portion of the quality controls used to analyze hydrographic data. After having described what is Pydro Universe, the community surrounding these tools and the relevant feedback from a recent customer satisfaction survey, this work describes a new chart adequacy algorithm and an experimental approach for bathymetric anomaly detection and classification. Introduction The rising trend in automation is constantly pushing the hydrographic field toward the exploration and the adoption of more effective approaches for each step of the ping-to-public workflow [1-6]. However, the large amount of data collected by modern acquisition systems - especially when paired with the force multiplier factor provided by autonomous vessels - conflicts with the increasing timeliness expected by today’s final users [7-9]. As such, it is not that surprising that both an improved hydrographic data accuracy and a faster throughput from acquisition to publicly-available data (e.g., chart application) are current priorities for any hydrographic office (HO)(e.g., [10]). Such priorities represent a processing challenge for the largely human-centered solutions that are currently available, and the adoption of automated and semi-automated data quality procedures seems the only scalable and long-term solution to the problem [11-13].
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for Hydrographic Surveys (S-44)
    S-44 Edition 6.0.0 International Hydrographic Organization Standards for Hydrographic Surveys International Hydrographic Organization Standards for Hydrographic Surveys Published by the International Hydrographic Organization 4b quai Antoine 1er Principauté de Monaco Tel: (377) 93.10.81.00 Fax: (377) 93.10.81.40 [email protected] www.iho.int ii IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys © Copyright International Hydrographic Organization 2020 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted in accordance with the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886), and except in the circumstances described below, no part may be translated, reproduced by any process, adapted, communicated or commercially exploited without prior written permission from the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO). Copyright in some of the material in this publication may be owned by another party and permission for the translation and/or reproduction of that material must be obtained from the owner. This document or partial material from this document may be translated, reproduced or distributed for general information, on no more than a cost recovery basis. Copies may not be sold or distributed for profit or gain without prior written agreement of the IHO and any other copyright holders. In the event that this document or partial material from this document is reproduced, translated or distributed under the terms described above, the following statements are to be included: “Material from IHO publication [reference to extract: Title, Edition] is reproduced with the permission of the Secretariat of the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (Permission No ……./……) acting for the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), which does not accept responsibility for the correctness of the material as reproduced: in case of doubt, the IHO’s authentic text shall prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About: Underwater Surveys
    FACTS ABOUT An Information Update from the IADC UNDERWATER SURVEYS WHAT IS SURVEYING? related characteristics of a body of water. These Surveying is the science of accurately determining the area of measurements describe features which affect maritime any portion of the Earth’s surface, be it on land or underwater. navigation, marine construction, dredging, offshore oil The general aim of surveying is to measure and fix a position exploration and drilling and related activities. During in three dimensions. Underwater or hydrographic surveys are dredging, hydrographic surveys are used to verify dredging part of the data collection process used during dredging and accuracies and to measure the production performance and maritime infrastructure works to establish the seafloor and efficiency of dredging equipment. subsea conditions and monitor dredging accuracies. Surveying is an essential element and a prerequisite in the WHAT IS A BATHYMETRIC SURVEY? planning and execution of nearly every form of construction Part of hydrographic surveying is bathymetry, which is a project including maritime and dredging projects. Nowadays topographical survey of the seabed. Whilst land surveys are data can be stored on computers and shared, providing crucial relatively static, bathymetric measurements are dynamic as information to dredging contractors and their clients. the surveying vessel is moving through the water. Bathymetric surveys use acoustic sounding to measure water depth by WHY ARE SURVEYS NECESSARY FOR DREDGING? bouncing a sound wave from a transducer (a transmitting and Surveying is indispensable in the modern dredging industry. listening device) mounted on a ship to the seafloor and then Surveys are used to collect data about navigable waters – back to a receiver.
    [Show full text]