2 Line, D Line, F8 and P12 Evaluation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 Line, D Line, F8 and P12 Evaluation WMATA SERVICE EVALUATION STUDY Final Report June 2009 Prepared by: P2D WMATA Service Evaluation Study Final Report Contents GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND TERMS ............................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 4 PROJECT PURPOSE..................................................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT PROCESS..................................................................................................................................... 4 Analysis of Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................4 Public Involvement ...............................................................................................................................5 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 5 Service Planning...................................................................................................................................5 Traffic Operations .................................................................................................................................7 Customer Communications ..................................................................................................................8 Stops and Facilities ..............................................................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 11 PROJECT PURPOSE................................................................................................................................... 11 PROJECT PROCESS................................................................................................................................... 11 Analysis of Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................................11 Public Involvement .............................................................................................................................13 THE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD LINE (2A, 2B, 2C, 2G)...................................................................... 14 TRANSIT SERVICE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 14 Service Performance..........................................................................................................................14 Ridership.............................................................................................................................................16 On-time Performance .........................................................................................................................20 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 20 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS................................................................................................................ 25 September 2008 Comments...............................................................................................................25 February 2009 Comments..................................................................................................................25 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 25 Service Planning.................................................................................................................................25 Traffic Operations ...............................................................................................................................28 Customer Communications ................................................................................................................30 Stops and Facilities ............................................................................................................................30 ROUTES D1, D3, D4, D5, D6, D8 (D-ROUTES) ........................................................................................32 TRANSIT SERVICE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 32 Service Frequency..............................................................................................................................32 Running Times ...................................................................................................................................34 Cost and Subsidy ...............................................................................................................................35 WMATA Service Evaluation Study Fare payment .....................................................................................................................................37 Ridership ............................................................................................................................................37 On-time Performance .........................................................................................................................44 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 46 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS................................................................................................................ 54 September 2008 Comments...............................................................................................................54 January 2009 Comments ...................................................................................................................55 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 57 Service Planning.................................................................................................................................57 Traffic Operations ...............................................................................................................................61 Customer Communications ................................................................................................................64 Stops and Facilities ............................................................................................................................64 ROUTE F8................................................................................................................................................... 66 TRANSIT SERVICE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 66 Service Performance..........................................................................................................................66 Ridership.............................................................................................................................................66 On-time Performance .........................................................................................................................69 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 70 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS................................................................................................................ 74 October 2008 Comments ...................................................................................................................74 February 2009 Comments..................................................................................................................74 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 74 Service Planning.................................................................................................................................74 Traffic Operations ...............................................................................................................................77 Customer Communications ................................................................................................................79 Stops and Facilities ............................................................................................................................80 ROUTE P12 ................................................................................................................................................ 81 TRANSIT SERVICE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 81 Service Performance..........................................................................................................................81 Ridership.............................................................................................................................................81
Recommended publications
  • Ravenel and Barclay 1610 and 1616 16Th Street NW | Washington, D.C
    Ravenel and Barclay 1610 and 1616 16th Street NW | Washington, D.C. CORCORAN STREET NW Q STREET NW 16TH STREET NW OFFERING SUMMARY PROPERTY TOUR Property Visitation: Prospective purchasers will be afforded the opportunity to visit the Property during prescheduled tours. Tours will include access to a representative sample of units as well as common areas. To not disturb the Property’s ongoing operations, visitation requires advance notice and scheduling. Available Tour Dates: To schedule your tour of the Property, please contact Herbert Schwat at 202.618.3419 or [email protected]. Virtual tours are also available upon request. LEGAL DISCLAIMERS This Offering Summary is solely for the use of the purchaser. While the information contained in this Analysis has been compiled from sources we believe to be reliable, neither Greysteel nor its representatives make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Analysis. All financial information and projections are provided for reference only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, market conditions and other factors beyond our control. Purchaser is encouraged to conduct an independent due diligence investigation, prepare independent financial projections, and consult with their legal, tax and other professional advisors before making an investment decision. Greysteel does not have authority to legally bind the owner and no contract or agreement providing for any transaction shall be deemed to exist unless and until a final definitive contract has been executed and delivered by owner. All references to acreage, square footage, distance, and other measurements are approximations and must be independently verified.
    [Show full text]
  • 1025 15Th Street NW
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE * * * HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation X Amendment of a previous designation Please summarize any amendment(s) ______________________ Propertyname~T=h=e~E=th=e=l=h=m=s=t ________________________________________________ Ifan y part ofthe interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. Address 1025 151h Street N.W. Square and lot number(s) -'="S~qu=a=r=e=2-"-16"'--"==L=o!:....t0=0=2=6'--------------------- Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission .!.-'AN:=....:....:C::::....=2~F______________________________ _ Date of construction 1902 Date ofmajor alteration(s)______________ _ Architect(s) T. Franklin Schneider Architectmal style(s) .::::B~ea=u~x!....:Art~~s _________ Original use Residence/Multi-Family Present use Commercial/Office Property owner Honeybee Hospitality LLC Legal address of property owner 1842 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20009 NAME OF APPLICANT(S) Megan Merrifield, Honeybee Hospitality LLC (owner) If the applicant is an organization, it must submit evidence that among its purposes is the promotion of historic preservation in the District of Columbia. A copy of its charter, articles of incorporation, or by-laws, setting forth such purpose, will satisfy this requirement. Address/Telephone ofapplicant(s) 1842 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20009 (757) 553-7906 Name and title of authorized representative Stu.- M AILvalA f'(2.E.SEfl..l{A]ol\/ PLAtv'NE~ 1 ~ _. .. OA. e.ttT"ftz.A<,G~es Signature of representative -vv'?[J & Date AP!1.Jt.. 10, Z.OI'-J Name and telephone of author of application Gray O'Dwyer, EHT Traceries (202) 393-1199 D>te ,~,;,oo ~ l?'J'/ { H.P.O.statf -~ ~~~ '\.1\ Office of Planning, II 00 4'h Street, SW, Suite E650, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation
    A TROPHY TRANSFORMATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 888 16TH STREET, NW 03 A STAR-STUDDED SEQUEL The iconic Motion Picture Association of America Building has been transformed to attain its true potential and to suit its esteemed location at the center of our nation’s capital. Every facet of this trophy office building has been drastically enhanced to align it with today’s contemporary styles, as well as attract a broad cast of prestigious tenants. TRANSFORMATIONAL NEW FEATURES Two-story lobby with glass entry vestibules Floor-to-ceiling glass on every floor Spa-quality fitness center Dramatic rooftop event space and terrace penthouse and rooftop deck Luxurious finishes throughout 888 16TH STREET, NW 05 TIMELESS SOPHISTICATION TROPHY-STANDARD OFFICE BUILDING 888 16th St NW is among the most historic and enduring addresses in Washington, D.C. Reimagined for the 21st century, the newest Directed by architectural firm, Gensler, the stunning transformation of this trophy property occurs both inside and out. version of the building now hosts A-listers and power players in business, law, and lobbying. 121,000 SF Tenants and their clients are enveloped in a feeling of comfort and hospitality. Simple, neutral finishes combined with rich, warm tones and lustrous accents provide an elegant, sophisticated, and timeless look that caters to modern sensibilities. 888 16TH STREET, NW 07 A TROPHY TRANSFORMATION Clad in Portuguese limestone • New two-story lobby with Arabescato Oro marble stone floors and Trimmed with vertical Travertine stone and Mozambique wood
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011
    Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011 Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning August 2011 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning Jim Hamre, Director of Bus Planning Krys Ochia, Branch Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Parsons Brinckerhoff Brian Laverty, AICP, Project Manager Nicholas Schmidt, Task Manager 1401 K Street NW, Suite 701 Washington, DC 20005 Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Existing Conditions ES-1 Policies and Procedures ES-2 Future Demand ES-3 Recommendations ES-4 Introduction 1 Study Process 3 Coordination 3 On-Site Observations 3 Operating Issues 3 Future Demand 4 Permitting and Enforcement 4 Existing Conditions 7 Key Observations 8 Operating Issues 9 Policies and Procedures 17 Permitting 17 Enforcement 19 Future Demand 25 Methodology 25 Results 28 Recommendations 33 Facility Design 34 Demand Management 37 Permitting 39 Enforcement 42 Contents | i Figures Figure ES-1: Future Shuttle Demand Estimate ES-4 Figure 1: Location of Peer U.S. Transit Agencies 4 Figure 2: Study Stations 7 Figure 3: Vehicles in Tight Turning Areas May Block Bus Bay Entrances (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 4: Long Kiss & Ride Queue (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 5: Pedestrian Shortcut (Southern Avenue Station) 11 Figure 6: Shuttle Blocking Kiss & Ride Travel Lane (King Street Station) 12 Figure 7: Shuttle Blocking Bus Stop (Anacostia Station) 13 Figure 8: Typical Signs Prohibiting Non-Authorized Access to Station Bus Bays
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Sm Ithson Ia N WWII VETERANS App
    OPEN MUSEUM LOCATIONS WASHINGTON MONUMENT* AFRICAN AMERICAN JEFFERSON MEMORIAL ROOSEVELT MEMORIAL HISTORY& CULTURE MUSEUM* Federal Triangle Smithsonian Smithsonian Smithsonian 15th St. SW & Jefferson Dr. 15th St. SW & Jefferson Dr. / E. Basin Dr. SW at W. Basin Dr. SW near 15th St. NW & Madison Dr. Jefferson Memorial Independence Ave. Jefferson Dr. & 14th St. SW / Jefferson Dr. & 12th St. SW Jefferson Dr. & 14th St. SW Jefferson Memorial / Ohio Dr. & West Basin Dr. SW Ohio Dr. & West Basin Dr. SW 7Y, H1, L1, N3, X1 11Y, 13Y, 16X, 30N, 30S, 32, 33, 11Y, 13Y, 16X, 30N, 30S, 32, 33, 36, 336, 52, 63, 64, D1, N3, S2, S4, 52, 63, 64, D1, N3, S2, S4, X1, V1 11Y, 13Y, 16X, 52, V1 X1, V1 Travel Like You Live Here *Free timed entry passes required. *Timed entry passes required The District's renowned museums, memorials, and other for tours only. National Mall sites are always top destinations for visitors. AIR & SPACE MUSEUM* LINCOLN MEMORIAL SMITHSONIAN VISITOR Travel smarter, not harder! Skip the traffic and hassles of CENTER parking by taking public transit for the real DC experience. WHITE HOUSE L’Enfant Plaza Foggy Bottom Federal Triangle Use this guide to help you explore the city safely and sustainably. Smithsonian Jefferson Dr. SW & 7th St. Lincoln Memorial Circle SW L’Enfant Plaza Farragut West As a result of COVID-19, please be advised that timed entry Maryland & Independence Lincoln Memorial / 21st St. Archives/Navy Memorial McPherson Square passes and face masks are still required to enter most museums. Ave. SW / 7th & C St. SW & Constitution Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Housing Units.Pdf
    Label Property Name Address Nearest Metro Station Distance Walk A 3471 14th Street NW 3471 14th Street NW Columbia Heights 0.4 mile 8 min B Chapin Street Apts 1474 Chapin Street NW U Street 0.6 mile 11 min C Columbia Road Apts 1475 Columbia Road NW Columbia Heights 0.2 mile 4 min 2335 11th Street NW; D Garfield Terrace (Family) 2337 11th Street NW; U Street 0.5 mile 11 min 2339 11th Street NW; others E Garfield Terrace (Senior) 2301 11th Street NW U Street 0.5 mile 10 min F Harvard Towers 1845 Harvard Street NW Columbia Heights 0.7 mile 15 min 2101 4th Street NW; G Kelly Miller 2103 4th Street NW; Shaw-Howard U 0.5 mile 10 min 2105 4th Street NW; others H Ledroit Apts 2125 4th Street NW Shaw-Howard U 0.5 mile 10 min Meridian Manor Apts (Archbishop I 1424 Chapin Street NW U Street 0.5 mile 10 min Rivera Y Damas) J Ontario Terrace 2422 Ontario Road NW U Street 0.8 mile 16 min K The Avenue (Park Morton) 617 Morton Street NW Georgia Ave-Petworth 0.4 mile 9 min 1500 Meridian Place NW; L Urban Village 1502 Meridian Place NW; Columbia Heights 0.5 mile 9 min 1505 Newton Street NW; others M 1327 Kenyon St Cooperative 1327 Kenyon Street NW Columbia Heights 0.2 mile 4 min N 1820 California St Cooperative 1820 California Street NW U Street 0.7 mile 14 min O Christ House (Kairos House) 2544 17th Street NW Columbia Heights 0.6 mile 11 min 2824 Sherman Ave NW (Coalition P 2824 Sherman Avenue NW Columbia Heights 0.5 mile 11 min For The Homeless) Q 524 Kenyon St NW 524 Kenyon Street NW Georgia Ave-Petworth 0.6 mile 13 min R Champlain Court Cooperative 2201 Champlain Street NW U Street 0.8 mile 16 min S Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites Street Address Index
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES STREET ADDRESS INDEX UPDATED TO JANUARY 31, 2015 NUMBERED STREETS Half Street, SW 1360 ........................................................................................ Syphax School 1st Street, NE between East Capitol Street and Maryland Avenue ................ Supreme Court 100 block ................................................................................. Capitol Hill HD between Constitution Avenue and C Street, west side ............ Senate Office Building and M Street, southeast corner ................................................ Woodward & Lothrop Warehouse 1st Street, NW 320 .......................................................................................... Federal Home Loan Bank Board 2122 ........................................................................................ Samuel Gompers House 2400 ........................................................................................ Fire Alarm Headquarters between Bryant Street and Michigan Avenue ......................... McMillan Park Reservoir 1st Street, SE between East Capitol Street and Independence Avenue .......... Library of Congress between Independence Avenue and C Street, west side .......... House Office Building 300 block, even numbers ......................................................... Capitol Hill HD 400 through 500 blocks ........................................................... Capitol Hill HD 1st Street, SW 734 .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219
    Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Agenda item # 21 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD September 18, 2018 MOTION Made By: Ms. Hynes, Seconded By: Mr. Kasprowicz Action: Motion Carried Title: Approval and Authorization for the Commissioner of Highways to Execute a Letter Agreement with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to provide funding for WMATA’s Reimbursable Costs, and a Project Principles Agreement between WMATA, the Virginia Department of Transportation, I-66 Express Mobility Partners, and FAM Construction, LLC for the Transform 66 Outside the Beltway Project WHEREAS, the Transform 66 Outside the Beltway Project (Project) entails multimodal transportation improvements on the approximately 22-mile corridor on I-66 between U.S. Route 29 near Gainesville in Prince William County and the I-495 Capital Beltway in Fairfax County (Outside the Beltway Component) and is designed to address existing and future transportation challenges in the I-66 Corridor in a cost-effective and timely manner, to improve multimodal mobility by providing diverse travel choices through an efficient network of park-and-ride, HOV, transit, and Express Lane opportunities, and to enhance transportation safety and travel reliability for the public; and WHEREAS, the Project will be designed, built, financed, maintained, and operated by I- 66 Express Mobility Partners LLC (the Concessionaire or Developer), pursuant to a Comprehensive
    [Show full text]
  • Save the Date for In-Person Events National Police Week, October 13 – 17, 2021
    Save The Date for In-Person Events National Police Week, October 13 – 17, 2021 Monday, October 11th Honor Guard Teams / Motors / Support Staff Arrive Tuesday, October 12th Early Arrival Day (Reagan DCA, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM) Colorado Survivor & Peace Officer Reception, 5:00 PM to 8:00 PM (tentatively at Penn Quarter Sports Tavern, 639 Indiana Ave NW) Wednesday, October 13th Official Arrival Day (Reagan DCA, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM) C.O.P.S. 3rd Annual Blue Honor Gala, 6:30 PM 2800 South Potomac Ave Arlington, VA Thursday, October 14th C.O.P.S. Blue Family Brunch, 9:30 AM to 11:30 AM Colorado LEO Group Photo 7th St NW & Indiana Ave NW, 7:00 PM NLEOMF Candlelight Vigil on the National Mall, 8:00 PM Friday, October 15th C.O.P.S. Survivors’ Conference & Kids Programs, 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM C.O.P.S. Picnic on the Patio, 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM Saturday, October 16th National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service, 12:00 PM West Front Lawn of the US Capitol Colorado Peace Officer Remembrance Ceremony at NLEOM, 6:30 PM 450 F Street NW, near the southwest corner of the reflecting pool Sunday, October 17th Travel Home Day Monday, May 24th – Preliminary NPW information ([email protected]) Every year Danny publishes a “Guide To Attend National Police Week” that includes everything you could possibly want to know about travel, lodging, and attending NPW events. This year’s Guide will be available in August 2021 for the In Person NPW events in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph M. Sussman
    Factors Influencing Land Development Around Rail Transit Stations by Jeffrey Jan Sriver B.S., Civil Engineering Purdue University, 1993 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TRANSPORTATION at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology August, 1995 ©1995 Jeffrey Jan Sriver All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. r>" i, Signature of Author . .. ................ i/' : A;IparTnnt of CiIl and EnvironmentalEngineering i. Xa! r 1 August, 1995 Certified by ........... .. ... Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Advisor Accepted By. .. ri~. ..·.... ..Joseph . ...M.Sussman Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies ,.,A;A; UJS[{"rTs IN'i' "U'i'F Or 'fEC!4NOLOGY OCT25 1995 Factors Influencing Land Development Around Rail Transit Stations by Jeffrey Jan Sriver Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on 1 August, 1995, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation Abstract Many of the factors which have influenced development around transit stations over the past thirty years differ from those that shaped the nature of land development at the dawn of rail transit technology, 100 years ago. Rapid transit systems which have been built in the modem era represent investments in a mode of transport that nearly all other political, economic, institutional, and regulatory factors have been aligned to defeat. However, construction of a rail transit network does provide the opportunity to re-orient metropolitan area development in a manner which will take advantage of the travel efficiencies afforded by this transit mode and affect regional travel behavior and quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Responses to Local / Regional Agency Comments on I-66 Corridor Improvements Tier 2 Draft Environmental Assessment
    APPENDIX D RESPONSES TO LOCAL / REGIONAL AGENCY COMMENTS ON I-66 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TIER 2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I-66 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TIER 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT State Project: 0066-96A-297; UPC 105500 From: US 15 To: I-495 Prince William and Fairfax Counties, Virginia Federal Highway Administration Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Except for a few minor editorial corrections, the text in this appendix is unchanged from what was presented in the Tier 2 Revised EA. New substantive comments (i.e., those on the Tier 2 Revised EA) are addressed in Appendix G of the Tier 2 Final EA. This page intentionally left blank. Virginia Railway Express (VRE) – 6/17/15 Responses to Local/Regional Agency Comments D-1 1.) The Preferred Alternatives is indeed a combination of elements that were identified as part of Alternatives 2A and 2B. Recognizing the cost and complexity of the proposed improvements, VDOT has recommended that the project be implemented in phases. The proposed first phase extends the express lanes for 22 of the original 25 miles, from I-495 to Gainesville (University Boulevard), and then transitions to a traditional HOV lane in each direction. Efforts will be made to minimize expansion of VDOT right of way at University Boulevard and other areas in proximity to the B Line railroad corridor so as not to preclude options to expand the railroad corridor at a future time. 2.) In the Tier 2 Draft EA, park-and-ride lots were proposed at University Boulevard in Gainesville and in Haymarket.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Income Job Accessibility to Silver Line Extension (Sle) Job Center, Washington Dc Metro Area
    LOW INCOME JOB ACCESSIBILITY TO SILVER LINE EXTENSION (SLE) JOB CENTER, WASHINGTON DC METRO AREA BY SUNHYEONG SHIN CAPSTONE REPORT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Planning in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Adviser: Dr. Jesus Barajas 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Literature Review .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Job access and unemployment ...................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Accessibility as an indicator of social equity ................................................................................ 5 2.3. Theories about job-housing-transport mode mismatch ................................................................. 6 2.4. Other Example Extensions ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Metrorail in Washington DC Metropolitan Area .......................................................................... 7 3.2. Phase 1 Silver Line Extension (SLE) ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]